0% found this document useful (0 votes)
45 views10 pages

Case N (KN) M V: Position Position Position

1) The document analyzes the design of columns in a steel structure. It provides force results for 5 exterior and 5 interior columns. 2) It then summarizes the design of exterior column 1, which experiences axial force, bending moments, and shear. 3) The column cross-section is classified and its resistance to compression, bending, and other load combinations are calculated and verified to exceed the design requirements.

Uploaded by

Chhengnguon
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
45 views10 pages

Case N (KN) M V: Position Position Position

1) The document analyzes the design of columns in a steel structure. It provides force results for 5 exterior and 5 interior columns. 2) It then summarizes the design of exterior column 1, which experiences axial force, bending moments, and shear. 3) The column cross-section is classified and its resistance to compression, bending, and other load combinations are calculated and verified to exceed the design requirements.

Uploaded by

Chhengnguon
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 10

NORTON UNIVERSITY M_1 STEEL DESIGN

I. Column Design
➢ The Result force of column
Case NEd(KN) MEd VEd
(+) (-) Position (+) (-) Position (+) (-) Position
Co.1 314.08 - A3 27.46 25.32 A3 15.08 A3
Co.2 273.78 - A3 49.86 30.92 A3 27.85 A3
Exterio 5.61
Co.3 248.82 - A3 24.83 14.39 A3 20.72 A3
Co.4 328.62 - A3 34.35 31.83 A3 22.26 A3
Co.5 316.15 - A3 30.49 22.53 A3 19.75 A3
Co.1 609.86 - E3 0.13 0.93 E3 0.05 0.38 E3
Co.2 455.40 - E3 43.62 33.74 E3 19.34 E3
Interio Co.3 461.62 - E3 0.36 0.94 E3 0.05 0.38 E3
Co.4 611.35 - E3 21.82 16.90 E3 9.68 E3
Co.5 614.45 - E3 0.18 0.94 E3 0.05 0.38 E3
➢ 2D Views

➢ 3D Views

Prepared By: UM SOVANAROTH ID: 20120148 Submitted to: Dr. K.V .Sambath 1
NORTON UNIVERSITY M_1 STEEL DESIGN

▪ Column Design HEA: 180 (A3)


- Combination 1 (Exterio column): From Robbot Structural Analysis.

“ MEd” “N Ed” “V Ed”

▪ Structure Modeling : 2D

NEd=314.08KN NEd=314.08KN

MEd,y=27.46KN.m MEd,z=25.32KN.m

L=3500mm L=3500mm

Major (y) Minor(z)

h = 171mm , A = 45.25cm2
b = 180mm , hi = 152mm
tf

h ri y y d
tw = 6mm , d = 122mm
tw t f = 9.5mm , I y = 2510cm4
r = 15mm , I z = 924.6cm4
z
b Wel . y = 293.6.cm3 , W pl . y = 324.9cm4

Prepared By: UM SOVANAROTH ID: 20120148 Submitted to: Dr. K.V .Sambath 2
NORTON UNIVERSITY M_1 STEEL DESIGN

1. Step 1: Steel Grade


• for S275 , HEA 180
- tf =9.5mm< 16mm ⇒ fy =275MPa
- tw=6mm<16mm ⇒ fyw =275Mpa
2. Step2: Classification of cross section
for secton classification the coefficient 
235 235
= = = 0.92
fy 275

➢ Oustand Flange : Flange under Uniform Compression

(b − t w − 2r ) (180mm − 6mm − 2  15mm)


C= =
2 2
C 72mm
 = = 7.57
t f 9.5mm
C
The limiting value for class 1  9
tf
C
 = 7.57  9 = 9  0.92 = 8.28 OK!
tf

Therefore , the flange Outstand in Compression is class 1 !


➢ Oustand Web: Web Under pure bending and compression
C = d = 122 mm
C d 122mm
 = = = 20.33
t w t w 6mm
But,  N Ed = 314.08  103 N
1 N 
 = (1 + Ed )t w = 6mm , c = d = 122mm
2 f y ctw 
 f y = 275N / mm 2
1 314.08  103 N
 = (1 + ) = 1.28  1
2 275N / mm 2  122mm  6mm
 =1
The limiting value for class 1 in bending and compression is

C 396  = 1
 
t w (13 − 1)  = 1
C 396 396  0.92
 = 20.33  = = 30.36
tw (13 − 1) (13 1 − 1)

Therefore , the Web Outstand in bending and Compression is class 1 !

Prepared By: UM SOVANAROTH ID: 20120148 Submitted to: Dr. K.V .Sambath 3
NORTON UNIVERSITY M_1 STEEL DESIGN

▪ Step3: Design Cross Section Resistance


- Compression Resistance
Af y
N c. Rd = ( for class 1 Section)
M 0

A = 45.25cm 2 = 4525mm 2
f y = 275 N / mm 2
 M =1
0

(4525mm 2 )  (275 N / mm 2 )
N c. Rd = = 1244375N
1
N c. Rd = 1244.375.015KN
the design requirement is
N Ed  N Ed = 314.08KN
 1. 0 
N C . Rd  N C . Rd = 1244.375KN
314.08KN
 = 0.25  1
1244.375KN

Therefore, The design Compression resistance is ok Satisfied !

- Bending Resistance about (y-y) axis


W ply f y
 M c. Rd = M ply. Rd = ( for class1 sec tion)
 M0
W ply = 324.9cm3 = 324.9  103 mm 3
f y = 275 N / mm 2
 M = 1.0
0

(324.9  103 mm 3 )  (275N / mm 2 )


M c. Rd =
1
M c. Rd = 89347500 N .mm
M c. Rd = 89.34 KN .m
the design requirement is
M Ed  M = 27.46 KN .m
 1.0 Ed
M C .Rd M C .Rd = 89.34 KN .m
27.46 KN .m
 = 0.30  1
89.34 KN .m
Therefore, The design Bending resistance about (y-y) is ok Satisfied !

Prepared By: UM SOVANAROTH ID: 20120148 Submitted to: Dr. K.V .Sambath 4
NORTON UNIVERSITY M_1 STEEL DESIGN

- Bending Resistance about (z-z) axis


W pl . z f y
 M c. Rd = M ply. Rd = ( for class1 sec tion)
 M0
W pl . z = 156.5cm3 = 156.5  10 3 mm 3
f y = 275 N / mm 2
 M = 1.0
0

(156.5  10 3 mm 3 )  (275 N / mm 2 )
M c. Rd =
1
M c. Rd = 43037500 N .mm
M c. Rd = 43.037 KN .m
the design requirement is
M Ed  M = 25.32 KN .m
 1.0 Ed
M C .Rd M C .Rd = 43.037.KN .m
25.32 KN .m
 = 0.58  1
43.037 KN .m
Therefore, The design Bending resistance about (z-z) is Satisfied !

- Bending and Axial force Resistance

The requirement resistance is


N Ed  0.25 N pl , Rd
0.5hw t w f y
N Ed 
M 0

But, N Ed = 314.08KN  0.25 N pl .Rd = 311.09 KN Not Satisfy !


0.5  152  6  275
0.5hw t w f y
N Ed = 314.08KN  =
= 125.4 KN NOT Satisfy !
 M0 1
So, The effect of the axial force on the plastic resistance moment about the (y-y) axis

M pl , y , Rd (1 − n)
M N , y , Rd = , M N , y , Rd  M pl , y , Rd
(1 − 0.5 )
 N Ed = 314.08KN
N Ed
Where , n = 
 N pl , Rd = 1244.375KN
N pl , Rd
314.08KN
n= = 0.252
1244.375KN
( A − 2bt f ) (45.25  10 2 − 2  180  9.5)
= = = 0.24  0.5 ok !
A 45.25  10 2
89.34 KN .m(1 − 0.252)
 M N , y , Rd = = 75.939KN .m  M pl , y , Rd = 89.34 KN .m Ok !
(1 − 0.5  0.24)
  n −  2    0.252 − 0.24  2 
 M N , z , Rd = M pl , z , Rd 1 −    = 43.037 1 −    = 43.026KN .m
  1 −      1 − 0.24  

Prepared By: UM SOVANAROTH ID: 20120148 Submitted to: Dr. K.V .Sambath 5
NORTON UNIVERSITY M_1 STEEL DESIGN

- Shear Resistance
 fy 
AVz    AVz = 14.47cm2 = 14.47  10 2 mm 2
 V pl , Rd =  3   f = 275 MPa = 275 N / mm 2

M0  y
 M0 =1
 275 N / mm 2 
(14.47  10 mm )2 2

V pl , Rd =  3  = 229.74 KN
1
- The basic design requirement is

VEd  VEd = 15.08KN


 1 .0 
Vc , Rd Vc , Rd = 229.74.KN
15.08KN
 = 0.065  1
229.74 KN
Therefore, The design Shear resistance is Satisfied OK !

- Shear , Bending and axis force Resistance


Where , Reduced Moment resistance
(1 −  ) f y is the reduced Moment resistance
2VEd  VEd = 15.08KN
 =( − 1) 2 
V pl . Rd V pl . Rd = 229.74 KN
2  15.08
 =( − 1) 2 = 0.75
229.74
VEd = 15 .08 KN  0.5V pl . Rd = 0.5  229
- .74 KN = 114 .85 KN
so, the effect of the shear force on the bending resistance may be neglected, except where
shear buckling reduces the section resistance .
- Biaxial bending Interection Resistance
 
 M y , Ed   M z . Ed 
  +  1
 M N , y , Rd   M N , z , Rd 
In which 
and  are constants, which for I and H Section may be taken as follos =2 
and =5n

 =5x0.252=1.26>1 2
 27.46   25.32 
1.26

 89.34  +  43.026  = 0.60  1

Therefore, The design Biaxial bending Interection is Satisfied OK !

Prepared By: UM SOVANAROTH ID: 20120148 Submitted to: Dr. K.V .Sambath 6
NORTON UNIVERSITY M_1 STEEL DESIGN

▪ Step4: Design Buckling Resistance to Compression


-Effective length of column about axes is given by Lcr=Lcr.y=nL (n=1.0)
Lcr = Lcr . y = 1.0  3500 mm = 3.5m
-The Column will buckle about the weak (z-z) axis slenderness Value to determine
relative slenderness 1 is given by

E 210  10 3
1 =  = = 86.8
fy 275
Slenderness ratio about (y-y) axis is

Af y Lcr 1
= =  (for class 1 section)
N cr i 1
 Lcr = 3.5m
Lcr 1 
=   i y = 7.45cm = 0.0745m
i y 1 
 1 = 86.8
3.5m 1
= 
0.0745m 86.8
 = 0.541
Selection of flexural buckling curve for a cross-section (y-y) axis for S275 and
h
= 0.95  1.2 , t f = 9.5mm  100mm  Buckling curveis b  imperfection factor is  = 0.34
b

Prepared By: UM SOVANAROTH ID: 20120148 Submitted to: Dr. K.V .Sambath 7
NORTON UNIVERSITY M_1 STEEL DESIGN


  = 0.5 1 +  ( − 0.2) + 2 
 = 0.51 + 0.34(0.541 − 0.2) + 0.541  2

 = 0.704
1  = 0.704 1
=  =
 +  2 − 2  = 0.541 0.704 + 0.7042 − 0.5412
 = 0.86  1
  = 0.86

Af y  A = 4525mm
2

 N b , Rd = 
 M 0  f y = 275 N / mm
2

  M0 = 1

N b , Rd = 1070162N = 1070.16 KN
the design requirement is
N Ed  N Ed = 314.08KN
 1. 0 
N b. Rd  N b. Rd = 1070.116 KN
314.08KN
 = 0.29  1 Ok Satisfy !
1070.116 KN

Therefore, The design Buckling resistance about (y-y) axis is ok Satisfy !

- Design Buckling resistance about (z-z) axis

 Lcr = 3.5m
Lcr 1 
=   iz = 4.52cm = 0.0452m
iz 1 
 1 = 86.8
3.5m 1
= 
0.0452m 86.8
 = 0.89
Selection of flexural buckling curve for a cross-section (z-z) axis for S275 and
h
= 0.95  1.2 , t f = 9.5mm  100mm  Buckling curveis b  imperfection factor is  = 0.34
b

Prepared By: UM SOVANAROTH ID: 20120148 Submitted to: Dr. K.V .Sambath 8
NORTON UNIVERSITY M_1 STEEL DESIGN


  = 0.5 1 +  ( − 0.2) + 2 
 = 0.51 + 0.34(0.89 − 0.2) + 0.89  2

 =1
1   =1 1
=  =
 +  2 − 2  = 0.89 1 + 12 − 0.892
 = 0.68  1
  = 0.68

Af y  A = 4525mm
2

 N b , Rd = 
 M 0  f y = 275N / mm
2

  M0 = 1

N b , Rd = 846175N = 846.175KN

the design requirement is


N Ed  N = 314.08KN
 1.0 Ed
N b.Rd  N b.Rd = 846.175KN
314.08KN
 = 0.37  1
846.175KN

Therefore, The design Buckling resistance about (z-z) axis is ok Satisfy !

Prepared By: UM SOVANAROTH ID: 20120148 Submitted to: Dr. K.V .Sambath 9
NORTON UNIVERSITY M_1 STEEL DESIGN

Prepared By: UM SOVANAROTH ID: 20120148 Submitted to: Dr. K.V .Sambath 10

You might also like