0% found this document useful (0 votes)
27 views24 pages

The Social Cost of Corporate Irresponsibility: February 3, 2016

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1/ 24

The social cost of

corporate irresponsibility

February 3, 2016
On the virtues of efficient corruption
"Yes, there was corruption.
Yes, he gave favours to his family
and his friends, But there was real
growth and real progress. I think
the people of Indonesia are lucky.”
(Lee Kwan Yew, 2008)

“Rouba mas faz”


Corruption: the “efficient grease” argument
The costs of circumventing regulation

fuelskiller
Corruption the China mine
in China Corruption
Two Charges
men jailed for Hit
disasters
rail crash China’s Food
corruption & Drug
linked to Lotus
Regulator,collapse
Riverside Again
Behind Blast, Shortcuts and Lax Rules

Chinese Report Details Role of Political


Connections in Tianjin Blasts
On the social costs of corruption

“Corruption is one major reason why accidents


happen again and again…It is high time that we
took a careful look at connections between local
coal mine owners, local officials and the safety
watchdog. These links have set up barriers
against strict safety supervision.”

Li Yizhong, China Minister of Production Safety


Worker death rates are three times higher
at politically connected companies

Source: Fisman and Wang, 2015


Despite high fatalities, connected companies
never get preemptive safety audits!

Fraction of company-year observations


where major safety audit occurred

Death=0 Death>0
Unconnected 4.6% 16.0%
Connected 0.0% 15.8%

Source: Fisman and Wang, 2015


Why do companies hire connected execs?
7.00%

6.30%
6.00%

5.10%
Return on Assets

5.00%

4.00%

3.00%

2.00%

1.00%

0.00%
Connected Unconnected
Improving corporate conduct

● If corruption is profitable, can we


expect business to clean up their
own acts?

● How can we push business to


behave more responsibly?
A couple of “simple” fixes

● E-Procurement in Indonesia

● Centralized purchasing in Italy


A couple of “simple” fixes

● E-Procurement in Indonesia
– Introduction of internet contract information
and submission of bids online
– Bidders can submit prequalification
materials etc online
– Result: higher quality provision; broader
(geographically) set of bidders
● Centralized purchasing in Italy
Government purchasing in Italy before
centralized purchasing

Municipality B pays twice


as much for the same printer
as municipality A

A B
Centralized purchasing
● Between 2000 and 2005, goods were
gradually made available via national
purchasing agency (Consip) for a standard
(low) price

● Cities could still buy directly if they wished

● Prices paid fell by over 20 percent!

● Previously high prices were partly


corruption, but a great deal was due to
“passive waste” (i.e., laziness or weak
bargaining)
Fighting bribery: The bigger picture

● There will always be interests pushing


back against anti-corruption reforms,
whatever the public benefits might be.
Technocratic reform: a cautionary tale

● Major source of government expenditure in


India: liquid propane gas subsidies (US$8
billion/year), delivered locally

● Lots of “ghost households” thought to


receive subsidies
Curbing leakage through biometric IDs

● In 2013, India rolled out biometric IDs


required to obtain means-tested subsidies
(food; work; LPG)

● Initial results:
– black market fuel premium
increased by 15% (less
black market fuel supply)
– cost savings over more than US$1 billion
(Barnwal, 2015)
Technology: meet political reality

● “On January 31, 2014, the Cabinet


Committee on Political Affairs
unexpectedly decided to terminate the
UID-based LPG subsidy transfer policy.”

● Common explanation: recipients of false


subsidies lobbied for program’s
termination
Fighting bribery: The bigger picture

● Historically, anti-corruption reforms have


rarely succeeded without active
engagement of the broader citizenry
A vicious cycle: corruption and cynicism
3.6

Venezuela
3.4

Uruguay
Argentina

Chile Brazil Paraguay


3.2

Ecuador

Nicaragua Dominican Rep.

Bolivia
3

Panama
Costa Rica Honduras
Colombia
Peru
Guatemala
El Salvador
2.8

Mexico

2.4 2.6 2.8 3 3.2


How bad is national corruption?

Source: Latinobarometer survey, 2013


Fighting bribery: The bigger picture

● We are all a part of ensuring that


governments work better to keep
promises to their people, especially when
they’ve failed to do so in the past
Reforming a culture of corruption

Super-citizen Mockus
Changing culture in Bogota
On reforming corruption – last word

“Social problems can’t be solved through


better rules or better attitudes – you need both”

You might also like