Artificial Intelligence Apply For Predic PDF
Artificial Intelligence Apply For Predic PDF
Abstract: There are many factors effective on performance of the laser cutting process. Identification of more
effective factors requires which will give the significant effect on the cutting quality of materials. In recent years the
researchers have explored the number of ways to improve the quality of cutting in the different lasers. This paper
reviews the research work carried out so far in the area of laser cutting process and artificial intelligence. In artificial
intelligence use for prediction model for given input data of laser cutting operation. Also artificial intelligence
beneficial for the time saving because no next experiments are required for measuring output parameters.
1025 | P a g e
P. S. Chaudhari, Prof. D. M. Patel, Dr. J. L. Juneja / International Journal of Engineering Research
and Applications (IJERA) ISSN: 2248-9622 www.ijera.com
Vol. 2, Issue 4, July-August 2012, pp.1025-1028
Control (air traffic), Dong-Gyu ANN, Gwang-won JUNG,
Design (computer configuration), explained the influence of process parameter on
Medical diagnosis, drilling characteristics of an AI 1050 sheet with a
Instruction/training, thickness of 0.2 mm using a pulsed Nd: YAG laser
Interpretation (speech), through numerical analyses (Software ABAQUS
Monitoring (nuclear plant), V6.5) and experiments. For numerical analyses
Planning (mission planning), parameters condition was Input voltage – 400v,
Factory scheduling, duration time - 1.0 ms and 2.0 ms, frequency 4-12
Prediction (weather), Hz, Nozzle diameter - 0.7 mm and Velocity of
Repair (telephone). assisted gas - 345 m/s. Laser drilling experiments
were performed using a PC-NC controlled laser
Steps for Network Selection process for AI: [6] drilling system with investigate the variation of the
1. Prediction, diameter. The output parameters measured as the
2. Classification, diameter of the drilling hole, shape and the taper
3. Data Association, angle of the drill hole. All those parameters were
4. Data Conceptualization, measured via a Scanning Electron Microscope
5. Data Filtering. (SEM), comparison between numerical analyses and
experiment and find the optimal condition of drilling.
3. Literature Survey: From result, the optimal drilling condition was
Prof D. M. Patel, Dipesh Patel. Parametric determined at a plus duration time of 1 ms and a
Analysis of ytterbium: fiber laser cutting process. In pulse frequency of 12 Hz given the good result of
this report they mainly focus on cut quality and the drilling hole. [9]
cut quality mainly decided by surface roughness, kerf
width, and perpendicularity. The experiment was Nabil Ben Fredj et. al. generated ANN
carried out on 5mm thickness M.S. plate by varying model for prediction of surface roughness in grinding
the parameter like; laser power, gas-pressure, and process using table speed, depth of cut, grinding
cutting speed. The factorial design was used for wheel mesh size, dressing depth and number of
design of experiment and for find out the percentage passes as variables, with lowest calculated deviation
contribution of process parameter used Minitab 15 percentage between the predicted and the actual
software. Surface roughness was measured by values of the training data and the testing data, 2.47%
Surface roughness tester SJ-201 and kerf width was and 4.13% respectively. They stated that the
measured by equipment including digital camera and establishment of the regression models takes into
the UTHSCSA image tool version 3.0 program. [7] account the responses averages and therefore, can
give only an average model, which is not capable to
K. Abdel Ghany, M. Newishy, explained detect a particular tendency corresponding to specific
the cutting stainless steel by pulsed and CW Nd:YAG values or set of inputs. [10]
laser, it was shown that the laser cutting quality
depends mainly on the cutting speed, cutting mode, Ronny Pfeifer, Dirk Herzog, explained in
laser power and pulse frequency and focus position. this paper a suitable method to cut comparable thick
The cutting parameters that provided dross-free and 1mm Shape Memory Alloys sheets using an pulsed
sharp cut surface during pulsed laser mode were: Nd: YAG laser system with a high average power is
frequency = 200–250 Hz, duty cycle = 40%, actual presented. The impact of different laser and process
applied power = 210–250W (i.e., programmed peak parameters on the cut quality and the material
power, Pp = 880–1100W, cutting speed = 1–2 m/min, properties. A small kerf width (k = 150–300 µm) in
focus position = −0.5 to −1mm and nitrogen gas connection with a small angle of taper (θ < 2°) was
pressure = 9–11 bar. For CW mode, speed = 6–8 generated. Compared to short and ultra short-laser
m/min and power = 900–1100W with the same focus processing of SMA, high cutting speeds (v = 2–12
position and gas pressure. Using nitrogen gave mm/s) along with a sufficient cut quality (Rz = 10–30
brighter and smoother cut surface and smaller kerf µm) were achieved, offering the possibility to
than oxygen, although it is not economical. machine macro-SMA components (thickness: mm-
Increasing the frequency and cutting speed decreased range, cut length: cm/dm range) in an economic way.
the kerf width and the roughness of cut surface, while Compared to cw-laser machining a lower surface
increasing the power and gas pressure increased the roughness can be achieved. In comparison to short-
kerf width and roughness. Best cut quality was found and ultra short-laser processing of SMA the
at CW mode at speed from 6 to 8 m/min. Then, pulse drawbacks can be seen in the higher thermal impact
mode at low speed was 1–2 m/min. [8] of the laser–material processing on the SMA,
1026 | P a g e
P. S. Chaudhari, Prof. D. M. Patel, Dr. J. L. Juneja / International Journal of Engineering Research
and Applications (IJERA) ISSN: 2248-9622 www.ijera.com
Vol. 2, Issue 4, July-August 2012, pp.1025-1028
resulting in a HAZ (dimension: 6–30 µm) which
again affects the material properties and the reduced
accuracy of the cutting process. [11]
1027 | P a g e
P. S. Chaudhari, Prof. D. M. Patel, Dr. J. L. Juneja / International Journal of Engineering Research
and Applications (IJERA) ISSN: 2248-9622 www.ijera.com
Vol. 2, Issue 4, July-August 2012, pp.1025-1028
[6] James A. Freeman and David M. Skapura, [10] Nabil Ben Fredj, Ridha Amamou, Mohamed
Neural Networks, Algorithms, Applications Ali Rezgui, Surface Roughness Prediction
and Programming Techniques, Addison- Based Upon Experimental Design and
Wesley Publishing Company Inc., USA, pp. Neural Network Models, IEEE, SMC, TPIL2,
1- 4, 1991. 2002.
[7] Dipesh Patel, Prof. D.M.Patel. “Parametric [11] Ronny Pfeifer, Dirk Herzog, 2010, “Pulsed
Analysis of Ytterbium: fiber laser cutting Nd:YAG laser cutting of NiTi shape memory
process” - Ganpat university, kherva, alloys-Influence of process parameters”
Mehsana, Gujarat, India August-2010. Journal of Materials Processing Technology
[8] “Cutting of 1.2 mm thick austenitic stainless 210 (2010) 1918–1925.
steel sheet using pulsed and CW Nd:YAG [12] Luke Huang & Dr. Joseph C. Chen, “A
laser” by K. Abdel Ghany, M Newishy/2005, Multiple Regression Model to Predict In-
Journal of material processing and process Surface Roughness in Turning
technology, Vol-168, Page (438-447) 2005. Operation Via Accelerometer”, Journal of
[9] Dong-Gyu AHN, Gwang-won JUNG, 2009, Industrial Technology, Volume 17, No.- 2,
“Explained the influence of process 2001.
parameter on drilling characteristics of an AI [13] Avanish Kumar Dubey,Vinod Yadava,
1050 sheet with a thickness of 0.2 mm using “Optimization of kerf quality during pulsed
a pulsed Nd:YAG laser”, Transaction of laser cutting of aluminium alloy sheet”,
Nonferrous Met. Soc. China, s157-s163. journal of materials processing technology
204 ( 2 0 0 8 ) 412–418.
1028 | P a g e