Plemic ArchBulg
Plemic ArchBulg
Plemic ArchBulg
net/publication/329987992
CITATIONS READS
0 118
1 author:
Bojana Plemić
Visoka Turisticka Skola
11 PUBLICATIONS 1 CITATION
SEE PROFILE
Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
Романизација, урбанизација и трансформација урбаних центара цивилног, војног и резиденцијалног карактера у римским
провинцијама на тлу Србије (eв. бр. 177007), Министарства просвете и науке Републике Србије. View project
All content following this page was uploaded by Bojana Plemić on 29 December 2018.
1
On the one hand, the monuments of Within the territory of the so called Danubian provinces of the Roman
this cult were found largely in the men- Empire – Dacia, Moesia and Pannonia – there can be found a large
tioned provinces and in lesser numbers
in Dalmatia (12 pcs.), Noricum (1 pc.) number of archaeological artifacts belonging to a syncretistic or mys-
and Thracia (2 pcs.). On the other hand, tical cult1. These are mostly stone reliefs and small lead plaques with-
the results of the most recent research out almost any trace of epigraphic evidence or votive inscriptions that
claim that apart from the Pannonia re- could reveal more information about the deities in question, including
gion, the frequency of the finds is higher
in Upper Moesia, especially in the ar- their names. This, as well as the fact that for most of those artifacts we
eas of Singidunum and Viminacium. have no knowledge about the context of the finds, hampered attempts
See: Поповић 1992; Tudor 1976, 52; to understand their very complex iconographic and theological con-
Зотовић 2001. tent that has intrigued many researchers since the second half of 19th
2
Romanian scholar T. Antonescu
(1889) compiled a corpus of the monu- century (Tudor 1976, 49-51).
ments of the cult, which had been dis- The main element of this complex cult, since among various
covered by his time, linking them to iconographic versions of these monuments it appears as a constant,
the Cabiri. At a later stage E. Nowotny
is the representation of the cult’s central figures, showing one or two
(1896, 206) accepted this reasoning stat-
ing that it was a question of either Cabiri horsemen approaching a goddess. Considering the portraits of these
or Dioscuri. Some critical review of this horsemen, whom some of the relevant authorities denote as Cabiri
interpretation was given in more recent (Dioscuri)2 or Thraco-Mithraic riders (Мladenova 1984; 1958), the
literature by M. Tatcheva (2000).
3
Tudor (1976, 50, 94) based his opin-
cult was finally named the “Danubian horsemen’’. This was based on
ion on the frequency of the finds of the D. Tudor’s belief that the cult had a local character within the territo-
monuments he classified as Class A, ries of the middle and lower Danube basin, originating in the province
images that showed only one horseman of Dacia3. Opposing his view was an interpretation claiming that the
with the goddess and were created ac-
cording to the iconographic patterns of
central deity of this cult was a goddess while the horsemen were her
the Thracian horseman, which he con- subjects. According to that opinion, since her character could be seen
sidered to be chronologically the oldest. as resulting from solar theology, the name of the cult could be changed
They were found in their largest num- to the Cult of the Lunar Goddess4.
bers in the Roman province of Dacia.
4
Lj. Zotović in 1975 for the first time ex- In this paper, however, we shall not delve further into interpreting
pressed her opinion that the goddess could the cult’s name, nor perform the iconographic analysis of the composi-
be a solar deity, Luna, a central figure of the tion of these icons. It is our intention to bring to light one of its rather
cult in which the horsemen were subordi- neglected artistic aspects that, in our opinion, was of significant impor-
nate to her. At a later stage she developed
this hypothesis, suggesting that the new tance for the formation of the iconic imagery. We shall be considering
religion was created under the influence of the portraits of Epona (and Celtic fertility goddesses, in general) whose
Mithraism, i.e. as an expression of the same influence can be found in the monuments that, according to Tudor’s ty-
solar theology. Since in Mithraism women
pology (1976, 94), belong to Class B, showing a goddess surrounded by
were not allowed to participate in mys-
tery rites, the new religion with a central two horsemen. Actually, this idea had been emphasized by some earlier
female deity was to attract, among others, researchers but abandoned at a later stage or treated just as one of the
many women as devotees in the eastern possible analogies in the goddesses’ image, expressing its predominantly
provinces of the Empire, thereby becom-
ing a counterpart to the growing religion
syncretistic character. We, however, believe that its presence was not of
of Christianity (Зотовић 2001, 176-177; an accidental nature but occurred as a consequence of the natural evo-
1998; 1978; 1975, 41). lution of the cult that has accordingly assumed specific iconography.
60 Bojana PLEMIĆ
Epona, since fish as a symbol, to start with, was not her attribute at A monuments and does not appear in
all. Also, he pointed out that the goddess was never shown as Epona Class B monuments (Tudor 1976, 101).
CONTRIBUTION TO THE STUDY OF THE DANUBIAN HORSEMEN CULT... 61
which the horses are turning their profiles to Epona (Boucher 1990,
# 198-207; Euskirchen 1993, # 212-232, 240-246). Those images depict
her seated on a throne, with horses on both sides and, as for attributes,
she is usually holding a basket with fruit or bread (cakes) in her lap.
The hands can be seen in various positions: holding the basket (fig. 1),
caressing the horses on the muzzle or the neck (fig. 2), or feeding them
(fig. 3), a scene also found on the Danubian icons (fig. 4). In addition,
there are versions showing horses approaching her and eating directly
from the goddess’s skirt, where the offerings are forming a satchel in
her lap (Boucher 1990, # 206-207; Euskirchen 1993, # 217, 218, 221,
222, 225, 231, 241, 242, 244), which is quite similar to the image of the
Danubian goddess with a scarf or apron (fig. 5)8. It is interesting that
this way of holding the offerings can be anticipated from a Metz relief,
showing Epona standing surrounded by horses (fig. 6).
This iconographic type illustrates the functional and artistic depth
of Epona’s cult. The presence of the horses certainly emphasizes that
aspect of the goddess where she acts as a patron of these animals, i.e.
the patron of the noble art of horsemanship, very much respected
in the Celtic world and of paramount importance for transportation
and trading purposes, and an important element of warfare. The ges-
ture of Epona feeding or caressing the horses depicts her protective
aspect while the proportionally smaller images of the horses show
their subordinate position as well as their mortality in comparison to
the divine eternity of the central figure (Green 1992, 22-23). On the
other hand, the goddess on the throne has one universal connotation
explicitly represented by a basket full of fruit in her lap – this fertility
symbol is characteristic of several Celtic goddesses, from the local
ones such as Nehalennia to the nameless fertility or city goddesses in
charge of general health and prosperity (Green 1992, 10-16, 32-39).
From the point of studying the iconography of the Danubian goddess,
it is important to emphasize that these nameless deities were often
represented in the images of enthroned goddesses with a dress draped
over her wings and holding fruit (Green 1992, 34, fig. 12). This may
imply the influence of Celtic ideas on a much wider scale than just in
Epona’s iconography.
The highlighted artistic parallel between different Epona images
and the images of the Danubian goddess, as we have already men-
tioned, are iconographic citations that have assumed even their es-
sential connotations, which are then incorporated into the develop-
8
I owe a deep gratitude to my col-
league Adam Crnobrnja, Chief of the
Archaeological department of Belgrade
City Museum, who kindly provided me
with two illustrations of the Danubian
lead icons published in this work (fig. 4
– # AA 4504; fig. 5 – # AA 4389, Belgrade Fig. 1. Relief of Epona surrounded with horses; Landesmuseum, Stuttgart (after
City Museum). Boucher 1990, 994, # 201)
64 Bojana PLEMIĆ
ment of the this cult’s theology. The size of the horses and the gestures
with which Epona shows her protection and domination have similar
manifestations in the Class B monuments of Danubian horsemen. On
the one hand, the composition in which the goddess is flanked by two
horsemen is used with the aim of emphasizing the superiority of the
goddess, who, by deploying the gesture of feeding and caressing the
horses, demonstrates patronage not only over the animals but over the
people riding them as well, indicating that they are deities of a lower
rank. On the other hand, the offerings basket as a symbol of fertility
in Epona reliefs was altered so that another goddess, with a scarf or a
dress, presents offerings as if in a satchel. It is possible that this was just
an autochthonous artistic expression derived from the local costume,
CONTRIBUTION TO THE STUDY OF THE DANUBIAN HORSEMEN CULT... 65
German limes (Green 1992, 16, map 4). Epona, as the patron of horses
and horse breading and as one of the most important Celtic deities,
was incorporated into the Roman pantheon. This certainly resulted
from the importance that Romans ascribed to their mounted units
mainly of Celtic and to a lesser extent German origin. Many epigraphic
monuments proving this can be found in Roman military camps located
east of the Rhine and along the Danube (Linduff 1979). The popularity
of the goddess was also due to her universal character as the mistress
of life and death, i.e. her bestowal of general wellbeing, prosperity and
regeneration. Therefore, her status was officially confirmed in Rome
where she, of all the Celtic deities, was the only one with a state holiday,
celebrated every year on 18th December (Duval 1976, 50).
In respect to Epona cult reliefs depicting the goddess on a throne
surrounded by horses, even though Tudor (1976, 144) claimed that
such representations were not known in Dacia, there is one monu-
ment kept now in the Museum of Fine Arts in Budapest (fig. 2), which
likely originates from this province (Boucher 1990, # 207). Beside the
absence of such Epona’s representations in Dacia, Tudor also noted
that they were rare to the south of the Danube; in his time only two
monuments were registered, from Plovdiv and Abrit (Tudor 1976,
143, ref. # 135). However, in light of the more recent corpus of Epona’s
monuments, we should also add the reliefs from Gigen and Harletz
in nowadays Bulgaria i.e. province Lower Moesia (Euskirchen 1993,
CONTRIBUTION TO THE STUDY OF THE DANUBIAN HORSEMEN CULT... 67
# 219, 241). From our point of view, most interesting are the analogous
reliefs from Plovdiv and Harletz (fig. 7), which show the standing god-
dess surrounded by horses and caressing them in a quite similar man-
ner to the gesture of the Danubian goddess, so we believe that these
could have served as a model for her evolved iconography.
It is interesting to note that all these Epona’s reliefs were executed
in a kind of shallow rectangular niche which ends in a form that resem-
bles an aedicule. This shape was widely used by the Danubian horse-
men monuments that Tudor classified as type III. Icons of this type
were equally present in the neighboring regions of Dacia and Lower
Moesia, where 5 pieces were found in each of the regions, while one
example comes from Viminacium in Upper Moesia. It is interesting
that all these samples, except that from Viminacium, and the one from
the region of Montana in Lower Moesia, were made from lead and are
considered to have come from the same workshop (Tudor 1976, 66,
69; 1969, # 55, 77). Likewise, in 6 out of 9 of them there can be seen
identical goddess iconography, she outstretches her hands towards the
horses’ muzzle or head, using the gesture of caressing (Tudor 1969,
# 35, 42, 43, 72, 81, 99), similar to the above mentioned Epona re-
liefs. Keeping in mind that such finds were concentrated mostly in
the bordering region of Dacia and Lower Moesia (three of them are
from Romula, Sucidava, Orlea in the Romanian district of Olt and one
is from Gigen (Oescus) in the Bulgarian district of Pleven) and that
the nearest Epona reliefs of appropriate iconographic type were found
in Harletz/Augustae (Vratsa district in Bulgaria) and Gigen, we shall
dare to suppose that it is possible that this bordering territory was the
place where contact with the image of the Celtic goddess in question
occurred. In particular, the original area from which spread the use of
68 Bojana PLEMIĆ
similar one comes from Enns in Austria, i.e. former Roman military
camp Lauriacum, in the province of Noricum (Boucher 1990, # 203;
Euskirchen 1993, # 223). These monuments also could easily have in-
fluenced the iconography of the goddess of the Danubian horsemen
cult whose icons were found in larger numbers in Carnuntum (Tudor
1969, # 147-151) and Poetovio (Tudor 1969, # 155-159), where their
artistic influences could have intertwined, since they were the centers
of both cults.
Returning to our original hypothesis, and keeping in mind that
among the Pannonian icons there were none registered as class A
(Tudor 1976, 94), we believe that the growing complexity of the cen-
tral scene in which we have recognized Celtic influence, could have
had its beginnings in the northwest area of Lower Moesia i.e. bor-
dering regions with Dacia. This influence spread along the Danube
towards Upper Moesia where there were notable workshops for the
production of the Danubian horsemen icons in Viminacium/Kostolac
and Singidunum/Belgrade, and continued towards Sirmium in Lower
Pannonia, yet another important center of the cult (Ochsenschlager
1971; Поповић 1988; 1986). The existence of Epona’s cult in Upper
Pannonia and Noricum, especially bearing in mind the iconography
we have examined here (the image of the goddess surrounded by hors-
es), also could strongly support the defining process of the final icono-
graphic and theological contents of the Danubian votive images.
It is our hope that with this analysis we have managed to point out
again the importance of the iconographic influence Epona’s cult had
in the conception of the image and identity of the Danubian horse-
men cult’s goddess. We believe that it was wrongfully neglected by be-
ing so closely linked to the image of fish, an attribute uncommon to
the Celtic cult. This, unfortunately, led to erroneous interpretations of
their individual as well as combined connotations. The assimilation
of the elements found in the Danubian icons was most probably guid-
ed by what the artist could have seen in the surrounding area, which
was then taken as material that was adapted in order to be further
incorporated in the functional development of the cult. We feel free,
therefore, to propose a detailed iconographic analysis of the individual
motifs as a methodological approach for the additional explanation
of the mysterious contents of these icons. The presence of a Celtic in-
fluence in their formation, apart from the official solar theology, has
been just another important manifestation of syncretism typical for
the Late Roman period. At the time when an undefined line separat-
ing different religions became analogous to the declining identity of
Roman Empire, the assimilation of iconographic patterns and their
specific combinations served the purpose of installing a new ideol-
ogy, not unlike the phenomenon noted for the early development of
Christian art.
70 Bojana PLEMIĆ
Зотовић, Љ. 2001. Оловне иконе Црнобрња, A. 2007. Две иконе Nowotny, E. 1896. Ein römisches
са територије Виминацијума. In: подунавског коњаника из Уроваца. Mysterienrelief im bosnisch-
Лазић, М. (ed.). Vestigatio Vetustatis – Гласник Српског археолошког hercegovinischen Landesmuseum.
Александрини Цермановић- друштва 23, 279-287. – Wissenschaftliche Mitteilungen aus
Кузмановић од пријатеља, Bosnien und Herzegowina 4, 296-302.
сарадника и ученика. Београд. 165- Antonescu, T. 1889. Cultul Cabirilor in
179. Dacia. Bucureşti. Ochsenschlager, E. L. 1971. Lead Plaques
of the Danubian Horsemen Type at
Зотовић, Љ. 1975. Три оловне иконе Boucher, S. 1990. Epona. In: Kahil, Sirmium. – Sirmium 2, 51-68.
из збирке Музеја града Београда. – L. (ed.). Lexicon Iconographicum
Старинар 24-25, 33-42. Mythologiae Classicae V/1. Zürich / Šašel-Kos, M. 2008. Celtic Divinities
München. 985-998. from Celeia and Its Territory: Who
Јовановић, A. 2007. Огледи из античког Were the Dedicators? In: Sartori, A.
култа и иконографије. Београд. Campbell, L. 1968. Mithraic (ed.). Dedicanti e cultores nelle religioni
Iconography and Ideology. Leiden. celtiche. Milano. 275-303.
Jовановић, A. 1987. Прилози
проучавању античких култова у Duval, P. M. 1976. Les dieux de la Gaule Šašel-Kos, M. 1999. Pre-Roman
Горњој Мезији. – Зборник Народног (2nd ed.). Paris. Divinities of the Eastern Alps and
музеја (Ниш) 3-4, 79-87. Adriatic. Ljubljana.
Dušanić, S. 1976. Le nord-ouest de
Mладенова, Я. 1958. Бележки върху la Mésie Supérieure. In Papazoglu, F. Šiša-Vivek, M. / Leleković, Т. / Kalafatić,
изображенията на Дунавските (ed.). Singidunum et le nord-ouest de H. 2005. Ostava rimskog novca i srebr-
конници. In: Изcледвания в чест на la prоvince. Inscriptions de la Mésie nog posuđa iz Petrijanca. – Opuscula
академик Д. Дечев. София. 545-555. Supérieure I. Beograd. 93-162. Archaeologica 29, 231-245.
Поповић, И. 1995. Почеци локалне Euskirchen, M. 1993. Epona. – Tatcheva, M. 2000. Le syncrétisme reli-
производње сребрног посуђа у Berichte der Römisch-Germanischen gieux dans les provinces balkaniques de
Горњој Мезији. In: Поповић, И. / Kommission 74, 607-838. l’Empire romain. Les reliefs des soi-dis-
Цвјетићанин, Т. / Борић-Брешковић, ants cavaliers danubiens. – Živa antika
Б. (eds.). Радионице и ковнице Green, M. 1992. Symbol and Image in 50, 231-245.
сребра. Београд. 145-161. Celtic Religious Art (2nd ed.). London /
New York. Tudor, D. 1976. Corpus monumentorum
Поповић, И. (ed.). 1994. Античко religionis equitum Danuvinorum II:
сребро у Србији. Београд. Iskra-Janošić, I. 1966. Rimske votivne The Analysis and Interpretations of the
pločice od olova u Jugoslaviji (Prilog Monuments. Leiden.
Поповић, И. 1992. Радионица за tipologiji i rasprostiranju). – Opuscula
израду оловних предмета или Archaeologica 6, 49-68. Tudor, D. 1969. Corpus monumentorum
светилиште култа дунавских religionis equitum Danuvinorum I: The
коњаника у Виминацијуму. – Linduff, K. 1979. Epona: a Celt among Monuments. Leiden.
Viminacium 7, 29-47. the Romans. – Collection Latomus 38,
817-837. Zotović, Lj. 1998. The Cult of Lunar
Поповић, И. 1988. Нове оловне иконе Goddess or the Cult of Danubian
култа подунавских коњаника из Mladenova, J. 1984. Nouvelles notes Horseman. – Starinar 49, 63-75.
Сирмијума. – Старинар 39, 105-116. sur les monuments des Cavaliers
Danubiens. In Fol, A. / Buchner, Zotović, Lj. 1978. Les éléments orientaux
Поповић, И. 1986. Један E. / Danov, Ch. (eds.). Dritter dans le culte des cavaliers danubiens. In:
доњопанонски центар за израду Internationaler Thrakologischer De Boer, M. B. / Edridge, T. A. (eds.).
оловних икона подунавских Kongress zu Ehren W. Tomascheks, Hommages à Maarten J. Vermaseren III.
коњаника. – Зборник Народног 2-6. Juni 1980, Wien, vol. II. Sofia. Leiden. 1350-1378.
CONTRIBUTION TO THE STUDY OF THE DANUBIAN HORSEMEN CULT... 71
(резюме)
Основна задача на статията е да привлече внимание върху
пренебрегвано художествено влияние, съдействало значително
за оформяне на изображението на богинята в култа към
Дунавските конници. Образите на Епона на трон и заобиколена
от коне повлияват силно както върху Дунавските релефи от клас
В, представящи богинята в движение и докосваща конските
муцуни или хранеща ги с ръка, така и върху сцени, в които тя
повдига краищата на дрехата си, за да образува нещо като торба,
в която предлага фураж на коня, и накрая влияят и на редките
примери, където богинята е на трон. Тази идея е погрешно
изоставена от ранните изследователи, защото те приписвали на
богинята риба като неин атрибут, който е непознат в келтския
култ. Обаче изображенията на Епона от споменатия тип най-
вероятно отразяват промени в естественото развитие на култа
като подчертаване на превъзходството на богинята – нейният
жест на хранене и милване на конете показва патронаж не само
върху животните, но и върху хората, които ги яздят, като така се
отбелязва тяхната по-ниска позиция.
Имайки предвид най-новите публикации върху изображе-
нията на Дунавските конници, може да се приеме, че растящото
усложняване на централната сцена върху Дунавските плочки,
в което разпознаваме келтско влияние, вероятно се оформя в
граничните райони на Дакия и Долна Мизия. По-конкретно
тази зона е северозападната част на провинция Долна Мизия,
където са отбелязани важни находки от подходящ за насто-
ящата научна теза иконографски тип на Епона – от района на
римската крепост Августе край село Хърлец, Врачанско и от
римската колония Ескус край село Гиген, Плевенско. Именно
тази територия е най-вероятно първоначалната контактна зона
между паметници на двата култа – към Епона и към Дунавските
конници. Това синкретизиращо художествено влияние се раз-
пространило западно по реката и северно от нея – съответно
към Горна Мизия и Дакия. В Горна Мизия работели значими
работилници за производство на плочки на Дунавските ко-
нници – във Виминациум / Костолац и Сингидунум / Белград.
Въпросното влияние достигнало на запад до провинция Долна
Панония, където Сирмиум / Сремска Митровица бил друг ва-
жен център на този култ. Иконографски доказателства за на-
72 Bojana PLEMIĆ