Running Head: Abortion: Two Sides of A Coins 1
Running Head: Abortion: Two Sides of A Coins 1
Running Head: Abortion: Two Sides of A Coins 1
A Pilot Research
Name
University Affiliation
PROBLEM OF PRACTICE 2
Introduction
Abortion is one of the most talked about and controversial issues today. Whether abortion
is a crime or not is still a matter of personal opinions. Millions of fetuses are expelled from the
womb every year. An abortion can occur accidentally during pregnancy or it can be induced by
doctors. Many women lose their lives or develop subsequent pregnancy complications whenever
and abortion is carried out. Undergoing an abortion also leaves the mothers with psychological
problems and a lot of pain from reproductive organs despite the use of painkillers.
According to UNICEF, 250,000 women lose their lives every year because of abortions.
To some extent and in some countries, abortion is legally practiced. The aim of this study is to
prove that even though abortion might be permitted in some cases its disadvantages and harm it
Research Questions
By answering the following questions, the research results will be considered reliable and
valid.
1. What is the difference – with respect to mortality rate – between illegal and legal
abortion?
2. What is the relationship between abortion and the rate of death in mothers?
The following are the variable that were studied: age, level of income, level of education,
level of income, race, ethnicity, abortion, mortality, legal and illegal. Below are the null
hypotheses.
1. There is no difference – with respect to mortality rate – between illegal and legal
abortion?
Research Design
The research designs that will be used are descriptive and correlational research design.
Descriptive statistics such as mean, mode, and standard deviation will be used to analyze
demographic variables such as age, religion, nationality, race, level of education, level of
correlation, or negative correlation between variables. A positive correlation will mean that one
variable leads to the occurrence of another variable. In other words, when one variable increases,
the other variable also increases. A negative correlation means that when one variable increases,
qualify as a participant, the researcher considered the age of the respondent. The other
demographic variables came after the age. Participant must be between the age of 18 – 50. To
ensure that there was random sample, researchers randomly selected participants. Researchers
considered using random sampling because there is equal chance of selection and equal chance
The sample size was calculated at 95% confidence interval and a 5% margin of error
and the resulting sample was 285. Therefore, the results will be based on a sample of 285
participants. Because this is quantitative research study, data was collected using questionnaires,
surveys, and interviews. Out of 1100 participants, 996 completed questionnaires, therefore, the
sample size is based on the number of participants who completed the questionnaires and sat
The data collection took place within a period of 5 weeks. The questionnaires were then
fed into Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) for results and analysis. First, a reliability
test was carried out using Cronbach’s alpha. A reliability test ensures that the internal
consistency of a research study is on point. The Cronbach’s Alpha test of reliability confirmed
that the questionnaires produced similar results under the consistently applied conditions.
Even though the sample was randomly selected, the internal consistency test confirmed
that the scores were not as a result of randomly occurring events. Reliability and validity go hand
PROBLEM OF PRACTICE 5
in hand. A study results cannot be reliable unless it is valid and also there is no scenario that is
superior to the other. Validity refers to the reasonableness of the results. Are the results
reasonable or believable?
however, this pilot research yielded a value of .811 which means that the questionnaires were
highly consistent internally. After the internal consistency test, the data was subjected to
Limitations
Limitations are the factors that the researcher could not control. They are conditions,
shortcomings, and influences that the researchers had no power over. Some of the limitations
were finding study participants, getting institutions to participate, limited prior research topics on
the topic, language barriers, confidentiality issues, limited resources, and inability to control the
environment.
Finding study participants that were willing to participate in the study was not easy.
Many qualified participants failed or refused to participate because of the psychological trauma
caused by abortion and others also decided not to participate citing personal reasons. Getting
non-governmental organizations and other welfare groups to participate in the research was also
a challenge because they were not willing to release any information they have on the state of
abortion in their respective regions. There are a number of previous research works conducted
with respect to abortion, however, there are limited resources talking about the legality and
illegalities of abortion. Many studies have concentrated on the situations that might lead to an
regardless of their tribe and ethnicity. This resulted into a situation of language barrier. Some
participants could not respond to questions in English and also were semi-illiterate and resorted
to explaining themselves using signs. This was a limitation to the study because such people
could not complete questionnaires and respond to interview questions. Other potential
participants cited confidentiality issues. They asked to sign a confidentiality agreement before
participating in the research. Because we did not draft a confidentiality agreement before-hand
The research team was also working on limited resources. Our resources could not allow
us to cover a larger region. The data collection process was time consuming, expensive, and
tedious. We could not work on the budget that was earlier stipulated. Inability to control the
environment limited our abilities to obtain responses from participants. In some places, people