What Is Research
What Is Research
A descriptive study is governed by the following rules: subjects are generally measured once; the
intention is to only establish associations between variables; and, the study may include a sample
population of hundreds or thousands of subjects to ensure that a valid estimate of a generalized
relationship between variables has been obtained.
A Descriptive Design seeks to describe the current status of a variable or phenomenon. The
researcher does not begin with a hypothesis, but typically develops one after the data is collected.
Data collection is mostly observational in nature.
An experimental design includes subjects measured before and after a particular treatment, the
sample population may be very small and purposefully chosen, and it is intended to establish
causality between variables. Experimental Designs, often called true experimentation, use the
scientific method to establish cause-effect relationship among a group of variables in a research
study. Researchers make an effort to control for all variables except the one being manipulated QUALITATIVE RESEARCH DESIGN
(the independent variable). The effects of the independent variable on the dependent variable are The Design of a Qualitative Research
collected and analyzed for a relationship. 1. Phenomenological
•Describes the meaning of the lived experience from the perspective of the participant
A Correlational Design explores the relationship between variables using statistical analyses. •Seeks to achieve a deep understanding of the phenomenon by rigorous, systematic examination
However, it does not look for cause and effect and therefore, is also mostly observational in terms of it
of data collection. 2. Grounded Theory
•Goal is to develop a theory about the processes (social behaviour or scene) under investigation in
A Quasi-Experimental Design (often referred to as Causal-Comparative) seeks to establish a cause- a natural setting
effect relationship between two or more variables. The researcher does not assign groups and •Useful in areas where little is known or when a new perspective is needed
does not manipulate the independent variable. Control groups are identified and exposed to the •Tries to identify the core process and subsidiary processes in the situation
variable. Results are compared with results from groups not exposed to the variable. 3. Ethnography
•Aims to understand human behavior in the cultural context in which it is embedded
•Aims to understand the way in which people live from the emic (insider’s) perspective versus the
etic (researcher’s or outsider’s) perspective
4. Historical Research
•Historiography examines events of the past
•Historians believe the greatest value of historical knowledge is an increased self-understanding
RESEARCH DESIGN
Use Qualitative to… Use Quantitative to… VALIDITY AND RELIABILITY OF DATA-GATHERING INSTRUMENTS
Develop an initial understanding of an issue Recommend a final course of action If adopted, NO NEED.
Look for a range of ideas and feelings about Find whether there is consensus on a If original/revised form, HIGHLY NEEDED.
something particular issue
Understand different perspectives between Projects results to a larger population Validity is the degree to which an instrument assesses what the researcher is attempting to
groups and categories of people measure.
Uncover underlying motivations and factors Identify evidence regarding cause-and-effect A research instrument that gives the same results even if conducted twice is reliable.
that influence decision making and opinions relationships
Provide information needed to design a Describe characteristics of relevant groups of TYPES OF DATA GATHERED
quantitative study people For Quantitative: For Qualitative:
Explain findings from a quantitative study Test specific hypotheses and examine specific Specific variables studied Study the whole, not variables
relationships Numbers and statistics Words, images, objects
Precise measurements Reflections
POPULATION AND SAMPLE
Population – totality METHODS OF DATA COLLECTION
Sample – a portion of the population Direct or Interview Method
Indirect or Questionnaire Method
SAMPLING TECHNIQUES Registration
Probability Sampling Techniques Observation
Non-Probability Sampling Techniques Experiment
ANALYSIS OF DATA
For Quantitative:
Data are analyzed through numerical comparisons and statistical inferences.
For Qualitative:
Data are analyzed by themes based on the descriptions of the participants.
Discussion of Findings
Discussion of results/findings shall be guided by the statement of problems or objectives.
There are parts and guidelines that should be observed when answering every problem statement
or objective of the study.
1. Prefatory Information
•Make a one paragraph introduction of the problem. Preface the presentation of results with a
reminder of the research questions (or hypothesis).
2. Introduce table/chart/figure
•Make a one sentence introduction describing the content of the table, chart, or figure.
Example 1:
Prior to the conduct of the Mathematics Training Series, the respondents’ performances in
terms of various parameters were evaluated by their immediate supervisors using a questionnaire.
After the training, the same questionnaire was administered to their immediate supervisors to
measure the change in the performance of the respondents.
Table 2 shows the performance evaluation of the respondents by their immediate
supervisors before and after the training.
4. Statement of Hypotheses
•Take note that the findings and claim come after the statement of hypotheses. (and
acceptance/rejection of such).
Example:
TEST OF DIFFERENCE IN THE ATTITUDE (BEFORE AND AFTER) OF THE RESPONDENTS TOWARDS the pre-test. The performance of the control group in the pre-test and post-test are almost the
COLLEGE ALGEBRA same.
This finding might have been due to the fact that the control group was taught using the
conventional or traditional mode of instructional delivery which is characterized by chalk and
board, more teacher talk, and less students’ participation or classroom engagement.
This supports the conclusion of Alegria [8] that nothing will change in the performance of
students if innovation is not included in the teaching-learning competencies, especially by the
teachers. According to her, teachers need to use varied instructional methods, techniques, and
•There is no significant difference in the attitude of the control group and the experimental group
approaches to enhance students’ active participation and strengthen their grasp of the important
before and after the experiment.
concepts and skills related to the topic.
INCORRECT: When subjected to t-test analysis, results revealed no significant difference in the
INCORRECT:
attitude towards College Algebra of the control group as indicated by the p-value of 0.195 which is
The study of De Villa (2010) that . . . negates the finding of the current study.
greater than the 0.05 level of significance. Therefore, the null hypothesis which states that there is
CORRECT:
no significant difference in the attitude of the control group before and after the experiment is
The current study negates the findings of De Villa (2010) that …
accepted.
CORRECT: When subjected to t-test analysis, the p-value of 0.000 is lower than the 0.05 level of
significance. Therefore, the null hypothesis which states that there is no significant difference in
the attitude towards College Algebra of the experimental group before and after the experiment is
6. Conclusion
rejected. This result reveals that the attitude of the experimental group before the experiment is
•Draw conclusion.
significantly different to their attitude towards College Algebra after the experiment.
•Make a claim.
•Explain the implication of the finding/ conclusion to the field of study or to concerned/affected
5. Comparison/ Corroboration
groups.
•Compare results with previous findings/theories to make generalizations.
Example 1:
Example 2:
TEST OF DIFFERENCE IN THE ATTITUDE (BEFORE AND AFTER) OF THE RESPONDENTS TOWARDS
COLLEGE ALGEBRA
On the other hand, the numerical observations in Table 5 with the performance of the
control group in the posttest showed no remarkable improvement as compared to their scores in
say. Most of the respondents also read any instructional materials in a loud manner, enough to be
heard by their ears.
The current study supports the findings of Doctolero (2011) that the group of second year
high school students which served as her respondents is composed of learners with different
styles in learning. However, the majority of which are students who learn best through the use of
It can be concluded that the problem-solving approach can help students strengthen their their sense of hearing.
favorable attitude towards College Algebra in particular, and towards any fields in Mathematics, in Because individuals have the tendency to both perceive and process information
general differently, this implies that how much individuals learn has to do with whether the educational
experience is geared toward their particular style of learning. Thus, educators are encouraged to
Discussion of findings/results place emphasis on intuition, feeling, sensing, and imagination, in addition to the traditional skills
•Prefatory Information of analysis, reasoning and sequential problem solving.
•Textual presentation (highlight of the tabular presentation of data/results)
•Interpretation Example 2:
•Implication
•Corroboration
•Conclusion/Recommendation
Prior to the implementation of the study, the two groups of respondents were given an
attitudinal questionnaire that gauges their feelings towards College Algebra. The same
questionnaire was administered to them at the end of the duration of the study. The weighted
means of their responses were compared to determine whether or not there is an improvement in
their attitude towards the subject. The results of the comparative analyses of the respondents
attitude using paired sample t-test through the SPSS software were reflected in table 8.
The table reveals that the p-value of 0.000 for the experimental group is lower than 0.05.
This means that the null hypothesis which states that there is no significant difference in the
attitude of the group before and after the conduct of the study is rejected. Therefore, it can be
noted that the experimental group exhibited a significant change in their attitude towards College
A questionnaire on learning style preference was administered to the respondents to Algebra.
identify how they best learn. Items which convey the same learning category were separated from Initially, the experimental group’s attitude towards the subject falls halfway between
one learning style to another for the scoring system as shown in appendix H. The learning style negative and positive acceptance. Their feeling towards College Algebra is a balanced mix of
which has the highest point determines how the respondent’s best learn. positive and negative attitude. However after the study, the weighted mean of the responses of
The table above summarizes the data on the learning styles of the respondents. the experimental group was categorized as favorable. Therefore, it can be noted that their
It can be gleaned from the table that both the experimental and control groups are attitude towards the subject significantly improved.
composed of learners with varying learning styles. However, it can be noted that the two groups This result of the analysis may be attributed to the interactive and collaborative learning
of respondents are dominated by auditory learners. environment that was enabled by the problem solving approach in teaching College Algebra. The
Such findings imply that most respondents of the groups learn best through verbal experimental group was provided with opportunities to discuss important previously learned
lectures, discussions, oral explanations, talking things through and listening to what others have to mathematical concepts integrated in the problem solving activities and to brainstorm on the steps
to be carried out to arrive at the correct solutions.
The approach had helped them gain mathematical power and confidence in performing Significant difference was posted between the attitude of the experimental group towards
problems solving tasks that led to the enhancement and development of a more positive attitude College Algebra before and after the conduct of the study. However, no significant difference was
towards College Algebra. posted between the attitudes towards College Algebra of the control group.
On the other hand, it can also be noted from the table that the computed p-value for the The experimental group gained a more positive attitude towards College Algebra than the
weighted mean of the control group’s responses is equivalent to 0.195 which is higher than the control group.
0.05 level of significance of this study. Therefore, the null hypothesis is accepted. This implies that The problem solving approach is a potential tool in helping students overcome their
the attitude towards College Algebra of the control group did not significantly change. Further, the anxiety towards mathematics subjects. Thus, teachers may consider attending to seminars or
finding indicates that there was no significant improvement in the attitude of the control group review educational materials that focus on the nature and procedures in the effective
towards College Algebra. implementation of the said teaching approach. This will enable them to effectively employ the
Such result may have been caused by the lack of relevant teaching intervention said approach in the delivery of mathematics instruction in the classroom setting.
introduced to the group. The control group was taught using the conventional method of teaching
mathematics where the students serve as receiver of information. Primarily, the teacher discusses Example 3:
the lesson and then provides a set of activities to the respondents at the end of the discussion. As to the final grade in Mathematics IV, 85% of the experimental group obtained a grade
The group was not given opportunities for exploration, interaction, and collaboration. Their of 81 and above, while only 5% had a grade of 76-80.
learning environment was dominated by the teacher. The experimental group and the control group have varied levels of academic
The findings of the current study coincides with the results that Farro (2014) found out in performance in their secondary mathematics subject.
his study that students develop a more favorable attitude towards mathematics when they are Mathematics teachers may consider historical data regarding the performances of their
given the opportunities to work on a given exercise or activity with their peers. students in their previous mathematics subjects to serve as input that will enable them to devise a
Indeed, the problem-solving approach is effective in enhancing and strengthening the learning plan that suit best to their learning characteristics.
positive attitude of the respondents towards the subject College Algebra.
Example 2: