History of Special Education.: January 2008
History of Special Education.: January 2008
History of Special Education.: January 2008
net/publication/234128998
CITATIONS READS
3 28,533
1 author:
Barbara J. Dray
Transforming Practices in Education, LLC
31 PUBLICATIONS 144 CITATIONS
SEE PROFILE
Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
Transforming Practices in Education, LLC for the advancement of multilingual learners View project
All content following this page was uploaded by Barbara J. Dray on 27 May 2014.
Peterson, J. M., & Hittie, M. M. (2003). Inclusive teaching: second-class citizens, and often states took custody,
Creating effective schools for all learners. Boston: Allyn which disempowered families from having rights with
& Bacon.
regard to their child with a disability.
Sands, D. J., Kozleski, E. B., & French, N. K. (2000).
Inclusive education for the 21st century. Belmont,
Because individuals with disabilities were viewed
CA: Wadsworth. as a burden to society and uneducable, the conditions
of institutions were often inhumane, with solitary con-
finement being the norm. It was not until the early
1900s that schools began to open their doors to indi-
SPECIAL EDUCATION, HISTORY OF viduals with disabilities as a result of parent advocacy
groups. However, institutionalization and isolationism
The special education movement can be characterized continued to prevail until the early 1970s. In fact, the
as having three major phases, exclusion and isolation, last institutions were dismantled during the Reagan
access and inclusion, and accountability and administration in the mid-1980s during the deinstitu-
empowerment. Historically, up until the mid-1960s tionalization movement.
and 1970s, disability was viewed as an abnormality or
“freak of nature,” and individuals who had disabilities
were forced into isolation and exclusion. During the Access and Inclusion
civil rights era through the 1980s, parents and The civil rights movement of the 1950s and 1960s had a
advocates pushed to shift this perspective and gain major impact on the treatment of individuals with dis-
rights for individuals with disabilities through access abilities, and its ripple effect took hold through a series
and inclusion. From the 1990s to the present, of court cases. Brown v. Board of Education forever
individuals with disabilities have become empowered changed the treatment of all students in education
and are working toward redefining their role and because of the change in educational law and procedure,
identity in society as a cultural phenomenon rather which had a tremendous effect on school policies and
than inferior to able-bodied, able-minded individuals procedures. The Brown case put desegregation at the
in the dominant mainstream. Additionally, systems forefront of equitable education and outlawed segrega-
such as case law and statutes, public and private tion based on unalterable characteristics such as race
programs, and advocacy organizations have been and disability because it violated equal protections and
created to make schools accountable for providing denied children equal educational opportunity.
equal educational opportunity for all students, The primary contention of the Brown case, that seg-
including individuals with disabilities. This entry regation by race was a denial of equal educational
reviews the political and social aspects that influenced opportunity, became the gateway for the disability
each of these historical phases in special education. movement because children with disabilities were
experiencing total exclusion, at best separate schooling
through institutions, with the norm being no access to
Isolation and Exclusion
schooling at all. In 1972, two landmark cases,
Up until the mid-twentieth century, individuals with Pennsylvania Association for Retarded Citizens
disabilities were excluded from mainstream society, (PARC) v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania and Mills v.
often being housed in institutions that isolated them Board of Education of the District of Columbia,
from the outside world and their families. Individuals became the catalysts for the right-to-education move-
with disabilities were considered abnormal and unable ment in the disability community. The PARC ruling
to function in society. It was said that such individuals stated that individuals with mental retardation between
disrupted and negatively influenced those in the main- the ages of six and twenty-one must be provided with
stream, which caused many families to stow away their a free public education in programs comparable to
family member with a disability in attics or remote their nondisabled peers. The Mills case paved the way
places. Individuals with disabilities were treated as for the right to due process and procedural safeguards
Special Education, History of———745
such as the right to a hearing with representation, a families banded together and affiliated themselves
record, and an impartial officer; the right to appeal; the with national organizations to push local school dis-
right to have access to records; and the requirement of tricts and key personnel as well as lobby state and
written notice during all phases of the process. Almost national politicians. Many of these groups (e.g., Asso-
simultaneously, in 1973, another important act was ciation for Retarded Citizens, The Association for
passed, Public Law (P.L.) 93-112, the Rehabilitation Persons with Severe Handicaps, Council for Excep-
Act. Section 504, as it is often referenced, stated that tional Children) continue to be the largest and most
any agency or activity receiving federal funding could influential lobbying forces today.
not discriminate against or deny benefits to individuals In the 1980s, there was much resistance to inclusion
with disabilities. of individuals with varying disabilities, in part because
In spite of these landmark decisions and the addi- teachers had not been trained or educated in how to pro-
tional forty-six cases filed in twenty-eight states fol- vide inclusive education and resources were limited for
lowing these decisions, school districts continued to implementing appropriate inclusion programming.
plead that they did not have the financial, program- Because parent advocacy groups had already begun to
matic, and staffing resources to provide adequate equal organize in the 1970s, these groups continued to apply
educational opportunity. As a result, the federal gov- pressure on the local school districts and practiced their
ernment increased its role in special education through right to due process. In 1986, the Handicapped
the Education of All Handicapped Children Action Children’s Protection Act was passed, which afforded
(EAHCA) or P.L. 94-142, which was passed into law in courts the authority to award attorney’s fees to parents
1975. The primary purpose of this bill was to provide or guardians who were in litigation.
not only an educational bill of rights but also financial In addition, during the Reagan administration, early
incentives to assist schools in providing equal educa- childhood intervention became of interest as reports
tional opportunity. This bill marked the beginning of an demonstrated the long-term success of early interven-
era of disability rights and inclusion. In the next twenty tion programs from the 1960s and 1970s. As a result,
years, public education went through major growing the Infants and Toddlers with Disabilities Act (ITDA)
pains to accommodate individuals with disabilities and was passed in 1986, which is now a subchapter under
shift its perspective toward the inclusion of all individ- the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA).
uals with disabilities, ranging from those who are med- Through ITDA, parents and families receive compre-
ically fragile with multiple disabilities to those with hensive services for their child from the onset of diag-
mild learning disabilities. nosis through school-age, typically birth through age
Simultaneously, society at large went through major five. These services differ from what is provided in the
shifts in perspective as individuals with disabilities public education system because they are developmen-
became more visible in the educational system and tal in nature. Thus, a heavy emphasis is placed on work-
participated in everyday activities within their neigh- ing with families to promote the development of the
borhood communities. As a result of educational oppor- physical, cognitive, communicative, social/emotional,
tunity, individuals with disabilities were not only and adaptive abilities of the child.
attending public schools and general education classes, At the end of the 1980s, the Americans with
but also graduating from high school and going on to Disabilities Act (ADA), which afforded antidiscrimi-
college. This was a big shift in consciousness from the nation protection, was introduced in Congress. This
early part of the century when isolationism and exclu- was a momentous time for the disability community as
sion were not only the norm but encouraged. Many dis- many came together to educate and advocate for the
ability advocacy groups gained popularity during this civil rights of individuals with disabilities. Each day,
era, even though their roots began well before 1975. the disability community shared stories, both with
Without the dedication and mobilization of parents politicians and the American people, of discrimination
and families, many believe that the disability rights that excluded and segregated individuals with disabili-
movement would not have succeeded. Parents and ties from being full participants in society. As a result
746———Special Education, History of
of this consciousness raising, people-first language the general education classroom to provide services,
became popularized. The use of people-first language including consultation, collaboration, and co-teaching,
was a concrete way of demonstrating the ideology that and assist the general education teacher in developing
individuals with disabilities should be viewed as modifications and accommodations of the curriculum
people first, with their disability as secondary. Thus, for students with special needs.
when referring to an individual with a disability, it is Also in the 1997 reauthorization, the age for transi-
proper etiquette to note the individual first and the dis- tion services was lowered to fourteen to ensure appro-
ability second (e.g., a student who uses a wheelchair priate planning for successful transition into adulthood;
instead of the wheelchair-bound student, a student the language of free and appropriate education was
with a learning disability instead of the learning dis- added to signify the ideology of education as a right;
abled student, etc.). and nondiscriminatory assessment and inclusion in
state assessments were added to ratchet up accountabil-
ity of special education placement, services, and pro-
Empowerment
grams. As a result, the 1990s marked the beginning of
ADA and people-first language greatly impacted the the era of accountability and empowerment as the con-
reauthorization of IDEA in the 1990s. In the 1990 sciousness of the American people shifted with the use
reauthorization, the word handicap was replaced with of people-first language, education as a right ideology,
disability, people-first language was used, and a transi- and the mandate for accountability.
tion component for students sixteen years and older The reauthorization of IDEA in 2004 continued to
was added. Transition services provide a plan to ensure move the agenda of accountability and empowerment
successful transition into adulthood for students leav- forward by emphasizing the implementation of a stan-
ing high school. This can include housing and services dards-based curriculum and scientifically based
in the community, employment opportunities through instruction, ensuring and defining highly qualified
job skills training, and college readiness through finan- teachers, and mandating the use of the response to
cial and counseling assistance. instruction model to determine appropriate interven-
The 1997 reauthorization had a drastic impact on tions and referral to special education. Response to
how students with disabilities were treated and edu- instruction examines the parameters in teaching and
cated in the public education system by affording more learning that affect how a student learns and uses data
rights and access to a free and appropriate education. to change instructional practices so that students with
Prior to this reauthorization, services for individuals disabilities can access content from the general educa-
with disabilities were still primarily provided through tion curriculum. This approach serves to empower
a pull-out or resource-room model in which students students with disabilities by raising expectations and
were provided services outside of the general educa- outcomes for learning and positioning educators and
tion classroom, either by being pulled from their gen- schools to be more accountable in doing so. There is
eral education classroom or by attending a separate, no longer a question as to whether accessing the gen-
segregated class often called a resource room. These eral education curriculum is appropriate, but rather a
separate services often used a different curriculum critical examination of how we create interventions
with lower standards than that provided in the general and adaptations so that students with disabilities can
education setting. access this knowledge.
As a result of the reauthorization of IDEA in 1997,
schools were mandated to provide services in the least Barbara J. Dray
restrictive environment, and the model for special edu-
cation services began to change whereby schools were See also Disabilities and the Politics of Schooling; Disability
shifting their primary mode of services from a segre- Studies; Special Education, Contemporary Issues
gated model to an inclusionary model. Through an
inclusionary model, special education teachers enter See Visual History Chapter 21, Students With Special Needs
Spelman College———747