Assignment

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 2

31/07/2019 Page Title

Due date: Friday 2 August 2019

Weighting: 20%

Submission: Via CloudDeakin (as a Word or PDF file)

Word count: 1600

Assignment Instructions
Research that underpins public relations campaigns is crucial to success and cannot be achieved without it.

Pre-campaign research must be undertaken in order to:

determine the organisation's background, current position and future direction aspirations
understand the environment in which the organisation operates
establish the organisation's past and current public relations efforts
identify and understand the organisation's target publics, both potential and existing.

The individual assessment task asks you to research the potential client organisation that will be the subject of Assignment 2 and 3. Research widely, going beyond
client interviews and 'googling' to gain the required information.

Now:

1. Define and describe the research you have undertaken in order to understand the organisation using the correct research terminology (see Class 2). Ensure you
cite your sources using the Harvard referencing system.
2. Summarise the findings of your research - you may use a table format or bullet points to present your findings in a concise manner if you so choose. Conclude
this section by presenting correctly formatted Problem and/or Opportunity statements that will underpin the forthcoming public relations campaign proposal.
Avoid identifying too many statements.

Review Smith's steps 1, 2 and 3 from your text to guide your approach your formative research by analysing the situation, organisation and publics:

a) Research the public relations situation:

What is the situation facing the organisation?


What is the background of the situation?
What is the significance or importance of the situation?

b) Research the organisation:

Internal environment, public perception and external environment.

c) Research the publics for the organisation:

Who are the publics? Who are the key publics? How can you categorise them?

The findings of your research will form the basis of your Situation Analysis section of Assessment Task 3, the Public Relations Campaign Proposal. The process of
the research approach will form the basis of the Research section of Assessment Task 3, the Public Relations Campaign Proposal.

Important: Whilst Assessment Task 1 is an individual task, please conduct any 'client contact' with your participating organisation as a group, respecting the
organisation's time, whether in-person, by phone or email.  Any organisation contact should be fully prepared prior in order to minimise imposing on the
organisational contact. Professionalism and normal business protocols must be adhered to at all times when dealing with the organisation. You are reminded to Deakin
University's Student Code of Conduct.

Marking criteria

In this assessment marking will be based on the following criteria:

Describing and defining the research undertaken by your group in preparation for your Public Relations Campaign Proposal (30%)
Summary of research findings - Organisation; Situation; Publics (30%)
Identifying research-driven Problem and/or Opportunity statements (20%)
Professionalism in approach and presentation (20%)

file:///Users/anoossadayo/Desktop/Bachelor /Year 3/T2/ALR300 Public Relation Campaign /Assignments /Assignment 1/Assessment Task 1 Instructions.html/Assess… 1/2
31/07/2019 Page Title
Rubric

Criteria Excellent Very good Good Satisfactory Unsatisfactory

30 points 22.5 points 19.5 points 16.5 points 12 points


Define and describe the
research undertaken by (24 - 30 points) (21 - 23.5 points) (18 - 20.5 points) (15 - 17.5 points) (0 - 14.5 points)
your group in preparation
for your Public Relations Reflects a very strong Reflects a good Reflects an adequate Reflects some Reflects little
Campaign Proposal. (30 understanding of the task understanding of the task understanding of the task understanding of the task understanding of the task
points) at hand, key research at hand, key research at hand, key research at hand, key research at hand, key research
methods and terminology. methods and terminology. methods and terminology. methods and terminology. methods and terminology.

30 points 22.5 points


19.5 points 16.5 points
(24 - 30 points) (21 - 23.5 points) 12 points
(18 - 20.5 points) (15 - 17.5 points)
A highly logical approach. A well-addressed (0 - 14.5 points)
A solid response in terms Some attention to key
Excellent presentation of response. Good
of attention to key information, necessary Lacks a logical approach.
key information in order to presentation of key
Summary of research information, included detail and clarity of Inadequate attention to key
provide context for the information in order to
findings - Organisation; detail and clarity of thought. information. Lack of detail
public relations function provide context for the
Situation; Publics. (30 thought. and clarity of thought.
and direction. public relations function Shows some
points)
and direction. Shows adequate understanding of the Shows little understanding
Shows superior
understanding of the issues, key problems and of the issues, key problems
understanding of the Shows good understanding
issues, key problems and the organisation’s present and the organisation’s
issues, key problems and of the issues, key problems
the organisation’s present situation and strategic present situation and
the organisation’s present and the organisation’s
situation and strategic issues. But would benefit strategic issues.
situation and strategic present situation and
issues. from refinement.
issues. strategic issues.

13 points 11 points
20 points 7 points
15 points
(12 - 13 points) (10 - 11 points)
Problem and/or (16 - 20 points) (0 - 9 points)
(14 - 15 points)
Opportunity statements. P/O statements are P/O statements are
(20 points) P/O statements are highly P/O statements are poorly
P/O statements are well generally approached in a acceptable but would
logical, strategic and very posed and inappropriately
posed and formatted. logical fashion and are benefit from further
well formatted. formatted.
appropriately formatted. refinement.

20 points

(16 - 20 points) 15 points 13 points 11 points 7 points

Excellent approach to (14 - 15 points) (12 - 13 points) (10 - 11 points) (0 - 9 points)


Professional presentation. grammar, spelling, Good approach to Adequate approach to Grammar, spelling, Grammar, spelling,
(20 points) punctuation, professional
grammar, spelling, grammar, spelling, punctuation, professional punctuation, professional
writing and syntax.
punctuation, professional punctuation, professional writing, syntax and writing, syntax and
Response reflects an
writing, syntax and writing, syntax and referencing needs some referencing needs
excellent understanding of
referencing. referencing. improvement. significant improvement.
required referencing
protocols.

HD D C P N
Overall Score
80 or more 70 or more 60 or more 50 or more 0 or more

file:///Users/anoossadayo/Desktop/Bachelor /Year 3/T2/ALR300 Public Relation Campaign /Assignments /Assignment 1/Assessment Task 1 Instructions.html/Assess… 2/2

You might also like