The Psychological Functions of Music Listening: Thomas Schäfer, Peter Sedlmeier, Christine Städtler and David Huron
The Psychological Functions of Music Listening: Thomas Schäfer, Peter Sedlmeier, Christine Städtler and David Huron
The Psychological Functions of Music Listening: Thomas Schäfer, Peter Sedlmeier, Christine Städtler and David Huron
Edited by: Why do people listen to music? Over the past several decades, scholars have proposed
Andriy Myachykov, Northumbria numerous functions that listening to music might fulfill. However, different theoretical
University, UK
approaches, different methods, and different samples have left a heterogeneous picture
Reviewed by:
regarding the number and nature of musical functions. Moreover, there remains no
Darya Zabelina, Northwestern
University, USA agreement about the underlying dimensions of these functions. Part one of the paper
Clemens Wöllner, Uni Bremen, reviews the research contributions that have explicitly referred to musical functions. It is
Germany concluded that a comprehensive investigation addressing the basic dimensions underlying
*Correspondence: the plethora of functions of music listening is warranted. Part two of the paper presents
Thomas Schäfer, Department of
an empirical investigation of hundreds of functions that could be extracted from the
Psychology, Chemnitz University of
Technology, 09107 Chemnitz, reviewed contributions. These functions were distilled to 129 non-redundant functions
Germany that were then rated by 834 respondents. Principal component analysis suggested three
e-mail: thomas.schaefer@ distinct underlying dimensions: People listen to music to regulate arousal and mood,
psychologie.tu-chemnitz.de
to achieve self-awareness, and as an expression of social relatedness. The first and
second dimensions were judged to be much more important than the third—a result that
contrasts with the idea that music has evolved primarily as a means for social cohesion
and communication. The implications of these results are discussed in light of theories on
the origin and the functionality of music listening and also for the application of musical
stimuli in all areas of psychology and for research in music cognition.
Keywords: music, functions of music, self-awareness, social relatedness, arousal regulation, mood regulation
students. Consequently, the existing literature is something of a must be strong and healthy. Thus, music would offer an honest
hodgepodge. social signal of physiological fitness.
The aim of the present study is to use the extant literature as Another line of theorizing refers to music as a means of
a point of departure for a fresh re-appraisal of possible musical social and emotional communication. For example, Panksepp
functions. In Part 1 of our study, we summarize the results of an and Bernatzky (2002, p. 139) argued that
extensive literature survey concerning the possible functions of
music. Specifically, we identified and skimmed hundreds of pub- in social creatures like ourselves, whose ancestors lived in arbo-
lications that explicitly suggest various functions, uses, or benefits real environments where sound was one of the most effective ways
for music. We provide separate overviews for the empirical liter- to coordinate cohesive group activities, reinforce social bonds,
atures and the theoretical literatures. This survey resulted in just resolve animosities, and to establish stable hierarchies of submis-
over 500 proposed musical functions. We do not refer to each of sion and dominance, there could have been a premium on being
the identified publications but concentrate on the ones that have able to communicate shades of emotional meaning by the melodic
identified either more than one single function of music listen- character (prosody) of emitted sounds.
ing or a single unique function that is not captured in any other
publication. In Part 2, we present the results of an empirical study A similar idea is that music contributes to social cohesion and
whose purpose was to distill—using principal components anal- thereby increases the effectiveness of group action. Work and war
ysis (PCA)—the many proposed functions of music listening. To songs, lullabies, and national anthems have bound together fam-
anticipate our results, we will see that PCA suggests three main ilies, groups, or whole nations. Relatedly, music may provide a
dimensions that can account for much of the shared variance in means to reduce social stress and temper aggression in others.
the proposed musical functions. The idea that music may function as a social cement has many
proponents (see Huron, 2001; Mithen, 2006; Bicknell, 2007).
REVIEW OF THE RESEARCH ON THE FUNCTIONS OF MUSIC A novel evolutionary theory is offered by Falk (2004a,b)
Discussions and speculations regarding the functions of music who has proposed that music arose from humming or singing
listening can be found in both theoretical literature concerning intended to maintain infant-mother attachment. Falk’s “putting-
music as well as in empirical studies of music. Below, we offer a down-the-baby hypothesis” suggests that mothers would have
review of both literatures. The contents of the reviews are sum- profited from putting down their infants in order to make their
marized in Tables A1, A2. Table A1 provides an overview of the- hands free for other activities. Humming or singing consequently
oretical proposals regarding musical function, whereas Table A2 arose as a consoling signal indicating caretaker proximity in the
provides an overview of empirical studies regarding musical absence of physical touch.
function. Together, the two tables provide a broad inventory of Another interesting conjecture relates music to human anx-
potential functions for music. iety related to death, and the consequent quest for meaning.
Dissanayake (2009), for example, has argued that humans have
THEORETICAL APPROACHES used music to help cope with awareness of life’s transitoriness.
Many scholars have discussed potential functions of music exclu- In a manner similar to religious beliefs about the hereafter or a
sively from a theoretical point of view. The most prominent of higher transcendental purpose, music can help assuage human
these approaches or theories are the ones that make explicit evo- anxiety concerning mortality (see, e.g., Newberg et al., 2001).
lutionary claims. However, there are also other, non-evolutionary Neurophysiological studies regarding music-induced chills can
approaches such as experimental aesthetics or the uses-and- be interpreted as congruent with this conjecture. For example,
gratifications approach. Functions of music were derived deduc- music-induced chills produce reduced activity in brain structures
tively from these approaches and theories. In addition, in the associated with anxiety (Blood and Zatorre, 2001).
literature, one commonly finds lists or collections of functions Related ideas stress the role music plays in feelings of transcen-
that music can have. Most of these lists are the result of litera- dence. For example, (Frith, 1996, p. 275) has noted that: “We all
ture searches; in other cases authors provide no clear explanation hear the music we like as something special, as something that
for how they came up with the functions they list. Given the aim defies the mundane, takes us “out of ourselves,” puts us some-
of assembling a comprehensive list, all works are included in our where else.” Thus, music may provide a means of escape. The
summary. experience of flow states (Nakamura and Csikszentmihalyi, 2009),
peaks (Maslow, 1968), and chills (Panksepp, 1995), which are
Functions of music as they derive from specific approaches or often evoked by music listening, might similarly be interpreted
theories as forms of transcendence or escapism (see also Fachner, 2008).
Evolutionary approaches. Evolutionary discussions of music can More generally, Schubert (2009) has argued that the fun-
already be found in the writings of Darwin. Darwin discussed damental function of music is its potential to produce plea-
some possibilities but felt there was no satisfactory solution to sure in the listener (and in the performer, as well). All other
music’s origins (Darwin, 1871, 1872). His intellectual heirs have functions may be considered subordinate to music’s pleasure-
been less cautious. Miller (2000), for instance, has argued that producing capacity. Relatedly, music might have emerged as a
music making is a reasonable index of biological fitness, and so safe form of time-passing—analogous to the sleeping behaviors
a manifestation of sexual selection—analogous to the peacock’s found among many predators. As humans became more effec-
tail. Anyone who can afford the biological luxury of making music tive hunters, music might have emerged merely as an entertaining
and innocuous way to pass time during waking hours (see Huron, remained unclear how the author(s) came up with the functions
2001). contained. Some of these works refer to only one single func-
The above theories each stress a single account of music’s tion of music—most often because this functional aspect was
origins. In addition, there are mixed theories that posit a constel- investigated not with the focus on music but with a focus on
lation of several concurrent functions. Anthropological accounts other psychological phenomena. Yet other works list extensive
of music often refer to multiple social and cultural benefits aris- collections of purported musical functions.
ing from music. Merriam (1964) provides a seminal example. In Works that refer to only one single functional aspect of
his book, The anthropology of music, Merriam proposed 10 social music include possible therapeutic functions for music in clini-
functions music can serve (e.g., emotional expression, communi- cal settings (Cook, 1986; Frohne-Hagemann and Pleß-Adamczyk,
cation, and symbolic representation). Merriam’s work has had a 2005), the use of music for symbolic exclusion in political terms
lasting influence among music scholars, but also led many schol- (Bryson, 1996), the syntactic, semantic, and mediatizing use
ars to focus exclusively on the social functions of music. Following of film music (Maas, 1993), and the use of music to manage
in the tradition of Merriam, Dissanayake (2006) proposed six physiological arousal (Bartlett, 1996).
social functions of ritual music (such as display of resources, con- The vast majority of publications identify several possible
trol, and channeling of individual aggression, and the facilitation musical functions, most of which—as stated above—are clearly
of courtship). focused on social aspects. Several comprehensive collections have
been assembled, such as those by Baacke (1984), Gregory (1997),
Non-evolutionary approaches. Many scholars have steered clear Ruud (1997), Roberts and Christenson (2001), Engh (2006), and
of evolutionary speculation about music, and have instead Laiho (2004). Most of these studies identified a very large number
focused on the ways in which people use music in their everyday of potential functions of music.
lives today. A prominent approach is the “uses-and-gratifications” By way of summary, there exists a long tradition of theorizing
approach (e.g., Arnett, 1995). This approach focuses on the needs about the potential functions of music. Although some of these
and concerns of the listeners and tries to explain how people theories have been deduced from a prior theoretical framework,
actively select and use media such as music to serve these needs none was the result of empirical testing or exploratory data-
and concerns. Arnett (1995) provides a list of potential uses gathering. In the ensuing section, we turn to consider empirically-
of music such as entertainment, identity formation, sensation oriented research regarding the number and nature of potential
seeking, or culture identification. musical functions.
Another line of research is “experimental aesthetics” whose
proponents investigate the subjective experience of beauty (both EMPIRICAL INVESTIGATIONS
artificial or natural), and the ensuing experience of pleasure. For A number of studies have approached the functions of music from
example, in discussing the “recent work in experimental aesthet- an empirical perspective. Two main approaches might be dis-
ics,” Bullough (1921) distinguished several types of listeners and tinguished. In the first approach, the research aim is to uncover
pointed to the fact that music can be used to activate associations, or document actual musical functioning. That is, the research
memories, experiences, moods, and emotions. aims to observe or identify one or more ways in which music is
By way of summary, many musical functions have been pro- used in daily life. In the second approach, the research goal is to
posed in the research literature. Evolutionary speculations have infer the structure or pattern underlying the use of music. That
tended to focus on single-source causes such as music as an is, the research aims to uncover potential basic or fundamental
indicator of biological fitness, music as a means for social and dimensions implied by the multiple functions of music. This is
emotional communication, music as social glue, music as a way mostly done using PCA or factor analyses or cluster analyses that
of facilitating caretaker mobility, music as a means of temper- reduce a large number of functions to only a few basic dimen-
ing anxiety about mortality, music as escapism or transcenden- sions. In some cases, the analyses are run exploratively whereas in
tal meaning, music as a source of pleasure, and music as a other cases, they are run in a confirmatory way, that is—with a
means for passing time. Other accounts have posited multiple predefined number of dimensions. The empirical studies can be
concurrent functions such as the plethora of social and cultural categorized according to several criteria (see Table A2). However,
functions of music found in anthropological writings about when discussing some of the most important works here, we will
music. Non-evolutionary approaches are evident in the uses- separate studies where respondents were asked for the functions
and-gratifications approach—which revealed a large number of of music in open surveys from studies where the authors pro-
functions that can be summarized as cognitive, emotional, social, vided their own collections of functions, based on either literature
and physiological functions—and the experimental aesthetics research or face validity.
approach, whose proposed functions can similarly be summa-
rized as cognitive and emotional functions. Surveys about the functions music can have
A number of studies have attempted to chronicle the broad range
Functions of music as they derive from literature research of musical functions. Most of these studies employed surveys in
As noted, many publications posit musical functions without pro- which people were asked to identify the ways in which they make
viding a clear connection to any theory. Most of these works use of music in their lives. In some studies, expert interviews
are just collections of functions of music from the literature. were conducted in order to identify possible functions. Table A2
Not least, there are also accounts of such collections where it provides a summary of all the pertinent studies including their
collections of functions and—where applicable—their derived proposed that music preferences emerge from the successful use
underlying dimensions. We will restrict our ensuing remarks to of music to serve specific functions for the listener, depending
the largest and most comprehensive studies. on the current situation. Lehmann identified 68 ways in which
Chamorro-Premuzic and Furnham (2007) identified 15 func- people use music, from which he was able to reduce them to
tions of music among students and subsequently ran focus groups 15 music reception strategies (Rezeptionsweisen) such as com-
from which they distilled three distinct dimensions: emotional pensation/escapism, relaxation, and identification. Misenhelter
use, rational use, and background use. Some of the largest surveys and Kaiser (2008) adopted Merriam’s (1964) anthropological
have been carried out by Boer (2009). She interviewed more than approach and attempted to identify the functions of music in the
a thousand young people in different countries and assembled context of music education. They surveyed teachers and students
a comprehensive collection of musical functions. Using factor and found six basic functions that were quite similar to the ones
analysis, she found 10 underlying dimensions: emotion, friends, proposed by Merriam (1964). Wells and Hakanen (1997) adopted
family, venting, background, dancing, focus, values, politic, and Zillmann’s (1988a,b) mood management theory and identified
culture. (Lonsdale and North, 2011, Study 1) pursued a uses- four types of users regarding the emotional functions of music:
and-gratifications approach. They identified 30 musical uses that mainstream, music lover, indifferent, and heavy rockers.
could be reduced to six distinct dimensions. In a related study
employing a larger sample, the same authors came up with eight Empirical studies on functions of music emerging from literature
distinct dimensions: identity, positive and negative mood man- research. A number of studies have made use of predefined musi-
agement, reminiscing, diversion, arousal, surveillance, and social cal functions borrowed from the existing research literature. The
interaction (Lonsdale and North, 2011, Study 4). When inter- significance of these functions and/or their potential underlying
viewing older participants, Hays and Minichiello (2005) qual- structure has then been empirically investigated using different
itatively identified six dimensions: linking, life events, sharing samples. As mentioned, not all of those studies tried to assemble
and connecting, wellbeing, therapeutic benefits, escapism, and an exhaustive collection of musical functions in order to pro-
spirituality. duce a comprehensive picture of the functions of music; but many
The various surveys and interview studies clearly diverge with studies were focused on specific aspects such as the emotional,
regard to the number of different musical functions. Similarly, the cognitive, or social functions of music.
various cluster and factor analyses often end up producing differ- Schäfer and Sedlmeier (2009) collected 17 functions of music
ent numbers of distinct dimensions. Nevertheless, the results are from the literature and found functions related to the manage-
often quite similar. On a very broad level, there are four categories ment of mood and arousal as well as self-related functions to be
that appear consistently: social functions, emotional functions, the ones that people highly ascribe to their favorite music. Tarrant
cognitive or self-related functions, and physiological or arousal- et al. (2000) used a collection of 10 functions of music from
related functions (see also Hargreaves and North, 1999; Schäfer the literature and factor analyzed them resulting in three distinct
and Sedlmeier, 2009, 2010). dimensions of music use: self-related, emotional, and social.
Sun and Lull (1986) collected 18 functions of music videos
Empirical studies using predefined collections of functions of music and were able to reduce them to four dimensions: social learning,
Apart from the open-ended surveys and interview meth- passing time, escapism/mood, and social interaction. Melton and
ods, a number of studies investigating musical functions Galician (1987) identified 15 functions of radio music and music
begin with researcher-defined collections or even cate- videos; and Greasley and Lamont (2011) collected 15 functions
gories/dimensions. Some of these predefined collections or of music, as well. Ter Bogt et al. (2011) collected 19 functions of
categories/dimensions were simply borrowed from the existing music from the literature and used confirmatory factor analysis to
published research, whereas others were derived from specific group them into five dimensions. In a clinical study with adoles-
theoretical perspectives. cents, Walker Kennedy (2010) found 47 functions of music that
could be reduced to five dimensions.
Empirical studies on functions of music emerging from specific By way of summary, extant empirical studies have used either
theoretical approaches. Some of the above mentioned theoretical an open approach—trying to capture the variety of musical
approaches to the functionality of music have been investigated in functions in the course of surveys or questionnaire studies—or
empirical studies. Boehnke and Münch (2003) developed a model predefined collections of functions as they resulted from specific
of the relationship of adolescents’ development, music, and media theoretical approaches or from literature research. These different
use. They proposed seven functions of music that relate to the approaches have led to quite heterogeneous collections of possible
developmental issues of young people (such as peer group inte- musical functions—from only few functions posited by a spe-
gration, physical maturation, or identity development). In two cific hypothesis, to long lists arising from open surveys. Moreover,
studies with a large number of participants, Lonsdale and North although the many attempts to distill the functions of music to
(2011) applied the model of media gratification (from McQuail fewer dimensions have produced some points of agreement, the
et al., 1972) and used a collection of 30 functions of music they overall picture remains unclear.
assembled from literature research and interviews. In both stud-
ies, they ran factor analyses—reducing the number of functions THE STRUCTURE AMONG THE FUNCTIONS OF MUSIC
to six dimensions and eight dimensions, respectively. Lehmann With each successive study of musical functions, the aggregate
(1994) developed a situations-functions-preference model and list of potential uses has grown longer. Questionnaire studies, in
particular, have led to the proliferation of possible ways in which et al., 2000; Laiho, 2004; Schubert, 2009; Lonsdale and North,
music may be relevant in people’s lives. Even if one sidesteps the 2011), there has been no large-scale empirical study that ana-
question of possible evolutionary origins, the multitude of hun- lyzed the number and nature of distinct dimensions using the
dreds of proposed functions raises the question of whether these broad range of all potential musical functions—known so far—all
might not be distilled to a smaller set of basic dimensions. at once.
As noted earlier, previous research appears to converge on four We sought to remedy this deficiency by assembling an exhaus-
dimensions: social functions (such as the expression of one’s iden- tive list of the functions of music that have been identified in past
tity or personality), emotional functions (such as the induction research and putting them together in one questionnaire study.
of positive feelings), cognitive or self-related functions (such as Based on the research reviewed in the first part of this study, we
escapism), and arousal-related functions (such as calming down identified more than 500 items concerned with musical use or
or passing time). These four dimensions might well account for function. Specifically, we assembled an aggregate list of all the
the basic ways in which people use music in their daily lives. questions and statements encountered in the reviewed research
Notice that cluster analysis and PCA/factor analysis presume that were either theoretically derived or used in empirical studies.
that the research begins with a range of variables that ultimately Of course, many of the items are similar, analogous, or true dupli-
capture all of the factors or dimensions pertaining to the phe- cates. After eliminating or combining redundant items, we settled
nomenon under consideration. The omission of even a single on a list of 129 distinct items. All of the items were phrased as
variable can theoretically lead to incomplete results if that variable statements in the form “I listen to music because . . . ” The com-
proves to share little variance in common with the other variables. plete list of items is given in Table A3, together with their German
For example, in studying the factors that contribute to a person’s versions as used in our study.
height, the failure to include a variable related to developmental
nutrition will led to deceptive results; one might wrongly con- METHOD
clude that only genetic factors are important. The validity of these Participants were asked to rate how strongly they agreed with each
analyses depends, in part, on including a sufficient range of vari- item-statement on a scale from 0 (not at all) to 6 (fully agree).
ables so that all of the pertinent factors or dimensions are likely to When responding to items, participants were instructed to think
emerge. of any style of music and of any situation in which they would lis-
Accordingly, we propose to address the question of musical ten to music. In order to obtain a sample that was heterogeneous
functions anew, starting with the most comprehensive list yet with regard to age and socioeconomic background, we distributed
of potential music-related functions. In addition, we will aim to flyers promoting the Internet link to our study in a local electron-
recruit a sample of participants covering all age groups, a wide ics superstore. Recruitment of participants was further pursued
range of socio-economic backgrounds, and pursue our analysis via some mailing lists of German universities, students from com-
without biasing the materials to any specific theory. prehensive schools, and members of a local choir. As an incentive,
respondents got the chance to win a tablet computer. A total of
FUNDAMENTAL FUNCTIONS OF MUSIC—A 834 people completed the survey. Respondents ranged from 8 to
COMPREHENSIVE EMPIRICAL STUDY 85 years of age (M = 26, SD = 10.4, 57% female).
The large number of functions of music that research has identi- Notice that in carrying out such a survey, we are assuming
fied during the last decades has raised the question of a potential that participants have relatively accurate introspective access to
underlying structure: Are there functions that are more funda- their own motivations in pursuing particular musical behaviors,
mental and are there others that can be subsumed under the and that they are able to accurately recall the appropriate expe-
fundamental ones? And if so, how many fundamental functions riences. Of course, there exists considerable empirical research
are there? As we have outlined above, many scientists have been in casting doubt on the accuracy of motivational introspection in
search of basic distinct dimensions among the functions of music. self-report tasks (e.g., Wilson, 2002; Hirstein, 2005; Fine, 2006).
They have used statistical methods that help uncover such dimen- These caveats notwithstanding, in light of the limited options
sions among a large number of variables: factor analyses or cluster for gathering pertinent empirical data, we nevertheless chose to
analyses. pursue a survey-based approach.
However, as we have also seen, the approaches and meth-
ods have been as different as the various functions suggested. RESULTS
For instance, some scholars have focused exclusively on the Principal component analysis revealed three distinct dimensions
social functions of music while others have been interested in behind the 129 items (accounting for about 40% of the vari-
only the emotional ones; some used only adolescent participants ance), based on the scree plot. This solution was consistent over
while others consulted only older people. Thus, these researchers age groups and genders. The first dimension (eigenvalue: 15.2%)
arrived at different categorizations according to their particular includes statements about self-related thoughts (e.g., music helps
approach. To date, there is still no conclusive categorization of the me think about myself), emotions and sentiments (e.g., music
functions of music into distinct dimensions, which makes psy- conveys feelings), absorption (e.g., music distracts my mind from
chological studies that rely on the use of music and its effects on the outside world), escapism (e.g., music makes me forget about
cognition, emotion, and behavior still difficult (see also Stefanija, reality), coping (e.g., music makes me believe I’m better able
2007). Although there exist some theoretically driven claims to cope with my worries), solace (e.g., music gives comfort to
about what fundamental dimensions there might be (Tarrant me when I’m sad), and meaning (e.g., music adds meaning to
As noted earlier, a presumed evolutionary origin for music The results of the present study may be of interest to psycholo-
need not be reflected in modern responses to music. Nevertheless, gists who make use of music as a tool or stimulus in their research.
it is plausible that continuities exist between modern responses The way people usually listen to music outside the laboratory
and possible archaic functions. Hence, the functions apparent will surely influence how they respond to musical stimuli in psy-
in our study may echo possible evolutionary functions. The chological experiments. For those researchers who make use of
three functional dimensions found in our study are compati- music in psychological studies, some attention should be paid to
ble with nearly all of the ideas about the potential evolution- how music is used in everyday life. The three dimensions uncov-
ary origin of music mentioned in the introduction. The idea ered in this study can provide a parsimonious means to identify
that music had evolved as a means for establishing and reg- the value a person sets on each of three different types of music
ulating social cohesion and communication is consistent with use. It is also conceivable that individual patterns of music use
the second dimension. The idea of music satisfying the basic are related to personality traits, a conjecture which may warrant
human concerns of anxiety avoidance and quest for meaning future research.
is consistent with the first dimension. And the notion that the With regard to music cognition, the present results are espe-
basic function of music could have been to produce dissoci- cially relevant to studies about aesthetic preferences, style or genre
ation and pleasure in the listener is consistent with the third preferences, and musical choice. Recent research suggests that
dimension. musical functions play an important role in the formation and
In light of claims that music evolved primarily as a means development of music preferences (e.g., Schäfer and Sedlmeier,
for promoting social cohesion and communication—a position 2009; Rentfrow et al., 2011). It will be one of the future tasks of
favored by many scholars—the results appear noteworthy. music cognition research to investigate the dependence of music
Seemingly, people today hardly listen to music for social rea- preference and music choice on the functional use of music in
sons, but instead use it principally to relieve boredom, maintain people’s lives.
a pleasant mood, and create a comfortable private space. Such a By way of summary, in a self-report study, we found that peo-
private mode of music listening might simply reflect a Western ple appear to listen to music for three major reasons, two of which
emphasis on individuality: self-acknowledgement and well-being are substantially more important than the third: music offers a
appear to be more highly valued than social relationships and valued companion, helps provide a comfortable level of activa-
relatedness (see also Roberts and Foehr, 2008; Heye and Lamont, tion and a positive mood, whereas its social importance may have
2010). been overvalued.
REFERENCES Interaktion, eds E. Keitel, K. of school. J. Res. Music Educ. 55, (New York, NY: Berghahn Books),
Arnett, J. J. (1995). Adolescents’ uses of Boehnke, and K. Wenz (Lengerich: 220–236. 31–56.
media for self-socialisation. J. Youth Pabst Science Publishers), 203–227. Chamorro-Premuzic, T., and Furnham, Dissanayake, E. (2009). “Root, leaf,
Adolesc. 24, 519–533. Boer, D. (2009). Music Makes the People A. (2007). Personality and music: blossom, or bole: concerning
Baacke, D. (1984). “Kommunikations- Come Together: Social Functions of can traits explain how people the origin and adaptive function
kultur der Jugend,” in Music Listening for Young People use music in everyday life. Br. of music,” in Communicative
Medienpädagogik and Kommunika- Across Cultures. Department of J. Psychol. 98, 175–185. doi: Musicality: Exploring the Basis of
tionskultur. Referate und Texte Psychology. Victoria University of 10.1348/000712606X111177 Human Companionship, eds S.
Nach Dem Ersten “Forum Wellington, Wellington. Available Coleman, J. S. (1961). “Psychological Malloch and C. Trevarthen (New
Kommunikationskultur,” ed I. online at: http://researcharchive. effects of the social system,” in York, NY: Oxford University Press),
de Haen (Frankfurt am Main: vuw.ac.nz/bitstream/handle/10063/ The Adolescents Society: The Social 17–30.
GEP), 37–53. 1155/thesis.pdf?sequence=1 Life of the Teenager and its Impact Engh, M. (2006). Popstars als Marke:
Bartlett, D. L. (1996). “Physiological Brown, J. D., Campbell, K., and Fischer, on Education, ed J. S. Coleman Identitätsorientiertes Marken-
responses to music and sound L. (1986). American adolescents and (Oxford: Free Press of Glencoe), management für die Musikindus-
stimuli,” in Handbook of Music music videos: why do they watch. 220–243. trielle Künstlerentwicklung und
Psychology, 2nd Edn, ed D. A. Int. Commun. Gaz. 37, 19–32. doi: Cook, J. D. (1986). Music as an inter- –Vermarktung. Wiesbaden:
Hodges (St. Louis, MO: MMB 10.1177/001654928603700104 vention in the oncology setting. Deutscher Universitäts-Verlag.
Music), 343–385. Brown, S. (2006). “How does music Cancer Nurs. 9, 23–28. Fachner, J. (2008). “Musik und verän-
Bicknell, J. (2007). Explaining strong work? Toward a pragmatics of musi- Darwin, C. (1871). The Descent of Man, derte Bewusstseinszustände [Music
emotional responses to music: cal communication,” in Music and and Selection in Relation to Sex. and altered states of conscious-
sociality and intimacy. J. Conscious. Manipulation: On the Social Uses London: John Murray. ness],” in Musikpsychologie. Das
Stud. 14, 5–23. and Social Control of Music, eds S. Darwin, C. (1872). The Expression of neue Handbuch, eds H. Bruhn,
Blood, A. J., and Zatorre, R. J. (2001). Brown and U. Volgsten (New York, the Emotions in Man and Animals. R. Kopiez, and A. C. Lehmann
Intensely pleasurable responses to NY: Berghahn Books), 1–30. London: John Murray. (Reinbek: Rowohlt), 594–612.
music correlate with activity in Bryson, B. (1996). “Anything but heavy DeNora, T. (1999). Music as a technol- Falk, D. (2004a). Prelinguistic evo-
brain regions implicated in reward metal”: symbolic exclusion and ogy of the self. Poetics 27, 31–56. doi: lution in early hominins: whence
and emotion. Proc. Natl. Acad. musical dislikes. Am. Soc. Rev. 61, 10.1016/S0304-422X(99)00017-0 motherese. Behav. Brain Sci. 27,
Sci. U.S.A 98, 11818–11823. doi: 884–899. doi: 10.2307/2096459 Dissanayake, E. (2006). “Ritual and rit- 491–503. doi: 10.1017/S0140525
10.1073/pnas.191355898 Bullough, E. (1921). Recent work ualization: musical means of con- X04000111
Boehnke, K., and Münch, T. (2003). in experimental aesthetics. Br. J. veying and shaping emotion in Falk, D. (2004b). The “putting the
“Jugendsozialisation und Medien. Psychol. 12, 76–99. humans and other animals,” in baby down” hypothesis: bipedal-
Helfen Medien und Musik beim Campbell, C., Connell, S., and Beegle, Music and Manipulation: On the ism, babbling, and baby slings.
Erwachsenwerden?” in Neue Medien A. P. (2007). Adolescents’ expressed Social Uses and Social Control of Behav. Brain Sci. 27, 526–534. doi:
im Alltag. Nutzung, Vernetzung, meanings of music in and out Music, eds S. Brown and U. Volgsten 10.1017/S0140525X0448011X
Fine, C. (2006). A Mind of Its Own: How Hunter, P. G., and Schellenberg, E. G. the pop music phenomenon: radio model. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 100,
Your Brain Distorts and Deceives. (2010). “Music and emotion,” in and music video utilization for 1139–1157.
New York, NY: W.W. Norton. Music Perception, Vol. 36, eds M. R. expectation, motivation and satis- Roberts, D. F., and Christenson, P.
Fitch, W. T. (2006). The biology Jones, R. R. Fay, and A. N. Popper faction. Pop. Music Soc. 11, 35–46. G. (2001). “Popular music in
and evolution of music: a com- (New York, NY: Springer), 129–164. doi: 10.1080/03007768708591286 childhood and adolescence,” in
parative perspective. Cognition 100, Huron, D. (2001). “Is music an evo- Merriam, A. P. (1964). The Handbook of Children and the
173–215. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition. lutionary adaptation?,’ in The Anthropology of Music. Evanston, Media, eds D. G. Singer and J. L.
2005.11.009 Biological Foundations of Music, eds IL: Northwestern University Press. Singer (Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage
Frith, S. (1996). Performing Rites. On R. J. Zatorre and I. Peretz (New Miller, G. (2000). “Evolution of human Publications, Inc), 395–414.
the Value of Popular Music. Oxford: York, NY: New York Academy of music through sexual selection,” Roberts, D. F., and Foehr, U. G. (2008).
Oxford University Press. Sciences), 43–61. in The Origins of Music, eds N. L. Trends in media use. Future Child.
Frohne-Hagemann, I., and Pleß- Juslin, P. N., Liljeström, S., Västfjäll, D., Wallin, B. Merker, and S. Brown 18, 11–37.
Adamczyk, H. (2005). Indikation Barradas, G., and Silva, A. (2008). (Cambridge: The MIT Press), Roe, K. (1985). Swedish youth and
Musiktherapie bei psychischen An experience sampling study of 329–360. music: listening patterns and moti-
Problemen im Kindes- und emotional reactions to music: lis- Misenhelter, D., and Kaiser, K. (2008). vations. Commun. Res. 12, 353–362.
Jugendalter. Musiktherapeutische tener, music, and situation. Emotion Social functions of music in music doi: 10.1177/009365085012003007
Diagnostik und Manual nach ICD- 8, 668–683. doi: 10.1037/a0013505 education. J. Artistic Creat. Educ. 2, Rösing, H. (1993). “Musik im Alltag,”
10. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck and Kapteina, H. (2010). Was Geschieht, 61–74. in Musikpsychologie. Ein Handbuch,
Ruprecht. Wenn Wir Musik Hören. Mithen, S. (2006). The Singing eds H. Bruhn, R. Oerter, and
Gantz, W., Gartenberg, H. M., Fragmente Zur Psychologie Neanderthals: The Origins of H. Rösing (Reinbek: Rowohlt),
Pearson, M. L., and Schiller, S. Des Hörens. Available online Music, Language, Mind, and Body. 113–130.
O. (1978). Gratifications and at: http://www.musiktherapie. Cambridge: Harvard University Ruud, E. (1997). Music and the quality
expectations associated with uni-siegen.de/kapteina/material/for Press. of life. Nord. J. Music Ther. 6, 86–97.
Pop music among adolescents. schungsgebiete/neu_was_geschieht_ Münch, T., Bommersheim, U., and doi: 10.1080/08098139709477902
Pop. Music Soc. 6, 81–89. doi: wenn_wir_musik_hoeren.pdf Müller-Bachmann, E. (2005). Schäfer, T., and Sedlmeier, P.
10.1080/03007767808591113 Laiho, S. (2004). The psychological “Jugendliches Musikverhalten. Musi- (2009). From the functions
Greasley, A. E., and Lamont, A. functions of music in adolescence. kinvolvement, Nutzungsmotive und of music to music preference.
(2011). Exploring engagement Nord. J. Music Ther. 13, 47–63. doi: Musikpräferenzen,” in Jugend- Psychol. Music 37, 279–300. doi:
with music in everyday life using 10.1080/08098130409478097 sozialisation und Medien, eds K. 10.1177/0305735608097247
experience sampling methodol- Larson, R. (1995). Secrets in the bed- Boehnke and T. Münch (Lengerich: Schäfer, T., and Sedlmeier, P. (2010).
ogy. Music. Sci. 15, 45–71. doi: room: adolescents’ private use of Pabst Science Publishers), What makes us like music.
10.1177/1029864910393417 media. J. Youth Adolesc. 24, 535–550. 167–199. Determinants of music prefer-
Gregory, A. H. (1997). “The roles doi: 10.1007/BF01537055 Nakamura, J., and Csikszentmihalyi, M. ence. Psychol. Aesthe. Creativity Arts
of music in society: the ethno- Laukka, P. (2007). Uses of music (2009). “Flow theory and research,” 4, 223–234. doi: 10.1037/a0018374
musicological perspective,” in The and psychological well- in Oxford Handbook of Positive Schubert, E. (2009). The funda-
Social Psychology of Music, eds D. J. being among the elderly. Psychology, 2nd Edn, eds S. J. Lopez mental function of music.
Hargreaves and A. C. North (New J. Happiness Stud. 8, 215–241. and C. R. Snyder (New York, NY: Music. Sci. 13, 63–81. doi:
York, NY: Oxford University Press), doi: 10.1007/s10902-006-9024-3 Oxford University Press), 195–206. 10.1177/1029864909013002051
123–140. Lehmann, A. C. (1994). Habituelle Newberg, A., D’Aquili, E., and Rause, Steele, J. R., and Brown, J. D. (1995).
Hargreaves, D. J., and North, A. Und Situative Rezeptionsweisen V. (2001). Why God Won’t Go Away: Adolescent room culture: studying
C. (1999). The functions of Beim Musikhören. Eine Einstell- Brain Science and the Biology of the media in the context of everyday
music in everyday life: redefining ungstheoretische Untersuchung. Belief. New York, NY: Ballantine life. J. Youth Adolesc. 24, 551–576.
the social in music psychology. Frankfurt: Peter Lang. Books. doi: 10.1007/BF01537056
Psychol. Music 27, 71–83. doi: Levitin, D. J. (2007). Life Soundtrack: North, A. C., Hargreaves, D. J., and Stefanija, L. (2007). Functions of music:
10.1177/0305735699271007 The Uses of Music in Everyday Life. O’Neill, S. A. (2000). The impor- a survey of research vocabularies.
Hays, T., and Minichiello, V. (2005). Montreal, QC: McGill University. tance of music to adolescents. Br. J. Muzikos funkcijos: tyrimø termi-
The meaning of music in the lives Available online at: http://levitin. Educ. Psychol. 70, 255–272. nologijos apžvalga. (Lithuanian)
of older people: a qualitative study. mcgill.ca/pdf/LifeSoundtracks.pdf Packer, J., and Ballantyne, J. (2011). 7, 6–17.
Psychol. Music 33, 437–451. doi: Lonsdale, A. J., and North, A. C. The impact of music festival Sun, S., and Lull, J. (1986). The ado-
10.1177/0305735605056160 (2011). Why do we listen to music. attendance on young people’s lescent audience for music videos
Heister, H.-W. (1993). “Stellenwert a uses and gratifications analysis. psychological and social well-being. and why they watch. J. Commun.
der Musik im gesellschaftlichen Br. J. Psychol. 102, 108–134. doi: Psychol. Music 39, 164–181. doi: 36, 115–125. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-
System,” in Musikpsychologie. Ein 10.1348/000712610X506831 10.1177/0305735610372611 2466.1986.tb03043.x
Handbuch, eds H Bruhn, R. Oerter, Maas, G. (1993). “Filmmusik,” in Panksepp, J. (1995). The emotional Tarrant, M., North, A. C., and
and H. Rösing (Reinbek: Rowohlt), Musikpsychologie. Ein Handbuch, sources of “chills” induced by music. Hargreaves, D. J. (2000). English
103–112. eds H. Bruhn, R. Oerter, and Music Percept. 13, 171–207. and American adolescents’ rea-
Herbert, R. (2011). Everyday Music H. Rösing (Reinbek: Rowohlt), Panksepp, J., and Bernatzky, G. sons for listening to music.
Listening: Absorption, Dissociation 203–207. (2002). Emotional sounds and the Psychol. Music 28, 166–173. doi:
and Trancing. Farnham, Burlington: Maslow, A. H. (1968). Toward a brain: the neuro-affective foun- 10.1177/0305735600282005
Ashgate Publishing Limited. Psychology of Being. 2nd Edn. New dations of musical appreciation. Ter Bogt, T. F. M., Mulder, J.,
Heye, A., and Lamont, A. (2010). York, NY: Van Nostr and Company. Behav. Process. 60, 133–155. doi: Raaijmakers, Q. A. W., and
Mobile listening situations in every- McQuail, D., Blumler, J. G., and Brown, 10.1016/S0376-635700080-3 Gabhainn, S. N. (2011). Moved
day life: the use of MP3 play- J. (1972). “The television audience: Peretz, I. (2006). The nature of by music: a typology of music lis-
ers while travelling. Music. Sci. 14, a revised perspective,” in Sociology music from a biological perspec- teners. Psychol.Music 39, 147–163.
95–120. of Mass Communication, ed D. tive. Cognition 100, 1–32. doi: doi: 10.1177/0305735610370223
Hirstein, W. (2005). Brain Fiction: McQuail (Middlesex: Penguin), 10.1016/j.cognition.2005.11.004 Troldahl, V. C., and Skolnik, R. (1967).
Self-Deception and the Riddle of 135–165. Rentfrow, P. J., Goldberg, L. R., and The meanings people have for radio
Confabulation. Cambridge, MA: Melton, G. W., and Galician, M. Lou. Levitin, D. J. (2011). The structure today. J. Broadcast. 12, 57–67. doi:
MIT Press. (1987). A sociological approach to of musical preferences: a five-factor 10.1080/08838156709386226
Walker Kennedy, S. (2010). An Zatorre, R. J., and Peretz, I. (2001). Conflict of Interest Statement: The This article was submitted to Frontiers
Exploration of Differences in The Biological Foundations of Music. authors declare that the research in Cognition, a specialty of Frontiers in
Response to Music Related to Levels of New York, NY: New York Academy was conducted in the absence of any Psychology.
Psychological Health in Adolescents. of Sciences. commercial or financial relationships Copyright © 2013 Schäfer, Sedlmeier,
Toronto, ON: University of Toronto. Zillmann, D. (1988a). Mood manage- that could be construed as a potential Städtler and Huron. This is an open-
Wells, A., and Hakanen, E. A. (1997). ment through communication conflict of interest. access article distributed under the terms
“The emotional use of popular choices. Am. Behav. Sci. 31, of the Creative Commons Attribution
music by adolescents,” in Mass 327–341. Received: 29 April 2013; paper pending License (CC BY). The use, distribution or
Media and Society, eds A. Wells Zillmann, D. (1988b). “Mood man- published: 24 May 2013; accepted: 18 reproduction in other forums is permit-
and E. A. Hakanen (Greenwich: agement: using entertainment to July 2013; published online: 13 August ted, provided the original author(s) or
Ablex Publishing Corporation), full advantage,” in Communication, 2013. licensor are credited and that the origi-
217–228. Social Cognition, and Affect, eds Citation: Schäfer T, Sedlmeier P, Städtler nal publication in this journal is cited, in
Wilson, T. D. (2002). Strangers to L. Donohew, H. E. Sypher, and C and Huron D (2013) The psy- accordance with accepted academic prac-
Ourselves: Discovering the Adaptive E. T. Higgins (Hillsdale, NJ: chological functions of music listening. tice. No use, distribution or reproduction
Unconscious. Cambridge, MA: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates), Front. Psychol. 4:511. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg. is permitted which does not comply with
Harvard University Press. 147–171. 2013.00511 these terms.
APPENDIX
Table A1 | Overview of theoretical contributions that have derived, proposed, or addressed more than one function or functional aspect of
music listening.
2: literature research,
Number of proposed
Source of functions
Proposed functions
(1: face validity,
Were functions
Arnett (1995) 1 1 functions
5 Uses of media: 0
Entertainment
Identity formation
High sensation
Youth culture identification
Coping
(Continued)
Table A1 | Continued
2: literature research,
Number of proposed
Source of functions
Proposed functions
(1: face validity,
Were functions
functions
Engh (2006) 2 4 3 Rational/cognitive benefits 1 Personal functions
Emotional benefits Social functions
Social benefits
(Continued)
Table A1 | Continued
2: literature research,
Number of proposed
Source of functions
Proposed functions
(1: face validity,
Were functions
functions
Emotional work
Diversion
Joy
Self-regulation
Emotional resource
Dealing with stress
Coping
Pumping up
Hedonic motive
Mood management
Affective awareness
Youth culture identification
Social utility
Withdrawal
Interpersonal relationships
Unity and isolation
Renegotiating relationship with parents
Background for courting
Autonomy
Importance of peers
Discussion topic
Develop relationships
Social motive
Belonging
Feeling of mastery
Self-determination
Resist authority
Achievement motives
Agency
Identity formation
Construction of self-identity
Personal identity
Self-identity
Conception of self
Cultivate private self
Assert personality
Identity formation
(Continued)
Table A1 | Continued
2: literature research,
Number of proposed
Source of functions
Proposed functions
(1: face validity,
Were functions
functions
Merriam (1964) 2 1 10 Socio-cultural functions: 0
Emotional expression
Aesthetic enjoyment
Entertainment
Communication
Symbolic representation
Physical response
Enforcing conformity to social norms
Validating social institutions and religious rituals
Enforcing continuity and stability of culture
Integration of society
Source
(1: journal article,
2: book or book section)
Total N
M
SD
Kind of study
(1: in lab or university,
2: internet,
3: secondary,
4: field,
5: qualitative)
Selection of functions
(1: by face validity,
2: by literature research,
3: by survey, 4: n/a)
Number of functions
identified
Functions identified
Were functions reduced
to factors or dimensions?
(0: no, 1: based on theory,
2: based on factor/cluster
analysis)
Dimensions
www.frontiersin.org
Source
(1: journal article,
2: book or book section)
Total N
M
SD
Kind of study
(1: in lab or university,
2: internet,
3: secondary,
4: field,
5: qualitative)
Selection of functions
(1: by face validity,
2: by literature research,
3: by survey, 4: n/a)
Number of functions
identified
Functions identified
Were functions reduced
to factors or dimensions?
(0: no, 1: based on theory,
2: based on factor/cluster
analysis)
Dimensions
Music videos fill the silence when I’m with other people
and no one is talking
To have something to talk about with m friends
Remind me of things happening in my own life
They show how other people deal with the same
problems I have
They help me to learn things about myself
I like to think about the meaning of the words in the song
They allow me to daydream
They make me wish I were some of the characters
They make me feel sexy
Campbell et al. 1 1155 13–18 – 5 3 – – Qualitatively
(2007) derived
dimensions:
Music-specific
benefits
Emotional benefits
Life benefits
Social benefits
Chamorro- 1 341 19.9 2.90 1 3 15 Listening to music really affects my mood 1 Emotional use
Premuzic and I am not very nostalgic when I listen to old songs I used Rational/cognitive
Furnham (2007) to listen to use
Whenever I want to feel happy I listen to a happy song Background use
When I listen to sad songs I feel very emotional
Almost every memory I have is associated with a
particular song
I often enjoy analysing complex musical compositions
I seldom like a song unless I admire the technique of the
musicians
I don’t enjoy listening to pop music because it’s very
primitive
Rather than relaxing, when I listen to music I like to
concentrate on it
(Continued)
The psychological functions of music listening
Source
(1: journal article,
2: book or book section)
Total N
M
SD
Kind of study
(1: in lab or university,
2: internet,
3: secondary,
4: field,
5: qualitative)
Selection of functions
(1: by face validity,
2: by literature research,
3: by survey, 4: n/a)
Number of functions
identified
Functions identified
Were functions reduced
to factors or dimensions?
(0: no, 1: based on theory,
2: based on factor/cluster
analysis)
Dimensions
www.frontiersin.org
Source
(1: journal article.
2: book or book section)
Total N
M
SD
Kind of study
(1: in lab or university,
2: internet,
3: secondary,
4: field,
5: qualitative)
Selection of functions
(1: by face validity,
2: by literature research,
3: by survey, 4: n/a)
Number of functions
identified
Functions identified
Were functions reduced
to factors or dimensions?
(0: no, 1: based on theory,
2: based on factor/cluster
analysis)
Dimensions
Gantz et al. 1 468 – – 4 1 6 It relieves my tension or takes my mind off things that are 0
(1978) bothering me
It gets me in or keeps me in a mood I want to be in
It helps me pass time or relieve boredom when I’m doing
other things
It makes me feel less alone when I’m with myself
I think about the meaning of the lyrics
It fills the silence when I’m with other people and no one is
talking
Greasley and 1 25 20.2 2.96 1 2 15 I chose the music 0
Lamont (2011) To help me concentrate/think
To distract me
To help me relax
To help me carry out activity
To help me create right atmosphere
To bring back certain memories
To create an emotion/mood
To accentuate an emotion/mood
To change an existing emotion/mood
Because i really like listening to it
Thought person(s) i was with would like
To help me pass the time
To help me feel less alone
To listen to the lyrics
Out of habit
Hays and 1 38 71.5 7.1 5 3 – – Qualitatively
Minichiello derived
(2005) dimensions:
Linking life events
Sharing and
connecting
Music and
wellbeing
The therapeutic
benefits of music
Time, reality and
escape
Spirituality
The psychological functions of music listening
Source
(1: journal article,
2: book or book section)
Total N
M
SD
Kind of study
(1: in lab or university,
2: internet,
3: secondary,
4: field,
5: qualitative)
Selection of functions
(1: by face validity,
2: by literature research,
3: by survey, 4: n/a)
Number of functions
identified
Functions identified
Were functions reduced
to factors or dimensions?
(0: no, 1: based on theory,
2: based on factor/cluster
analysis)
Dimensions
(Continued)
www.frontiersin.org
Source
(1: journal article,
2: book or book section)
Total N
M
SD
Kind of study
(1: in lab or university,
2: internet,
3: secondary,
4: field,
5: qualitative)
Selection of functions
(1: by face validity,
2: by literature research,
3: by survey, 4: n/a)
Number of functions
identified
Functions identified
Were functions reduced
to factors or dimensions?
(0: no, 1: based on theory,
2: based on factor/cluster
analysis)
Dimensions
To stir up energy
To relax and calm down
It helps me to concentrate
It is beautiful
To vent emotions
To reflect on my life
It strengthens my self image
To express my personality
To feel akin to others
To reduce feelings of loneliness
To express my feelings
To shield out the world around me
To strengthen self esteem
It makes me feel competent
To gain control of sounds in my surroundings
To master new skills
Lehmann (1994) 2 505 27.5 19.5 4 2 68 Ten exemplary items: 2 Types of music
Music can calm me down reception:
I feel secure Expression
Music makes me think about myself Compensation/
I want to dance escapism
Music puts me in another mood Motoric
Music can make me aggressive reproduction
I start dreaming Structure
I don’t feel alone Identification
Music makes time go faster Relaxation
I would line to change the world Sentimentality
Emotions/moods
Sensualism
Regression
Aspects of
performance
Background
Experience of
time
Activation
Coping
(Continued)
The psychological functions of music listening
Source
(1: journal article,
2: book or book section)
Total N
M
SD
Kind of study
(1: in lab or university,
2: internet,
3: secondary,
4: field,
5: qualitative)
Selection of functions
(1: by face validity,
2: by literature research,
3: by survey, 4: n/a)
Number of functions
identified
Functions identified
Were functions reduced
to factors or dimensions?
(0: no, 1: based on theory,
2: based on factor/cluster
analysis)
Dimensions
(Continued)
www.frontiersin.org
Source
(1: journal article,
2: book or book section)
Total N
M
SD
Kind of study
(1: in lab or university,
2: internet,
3: secondary,
4: field,
5: qualitative)
Selection of functions
(1: by face validity,
2: by literature research,
3: by survey, 4: n/a)
Number of functions
identified
Functions identified
Were functions reduced
to factors or dimensions?
(0: no, 1: based on theory,
2: based on factor/cluster
analysis)
Dimensions
(Lonsdale and 1 700 ≥16 – 1 2/3 48 Eighteen additional functions: 2 Personal identity
North, 2011, To reflect how I feel Negative mood
Study 4) To cheer me up management
To enjoy the music Positive mood
To brighten up my day management
To create an atmosphere Reminiscing
To reminisce about the past Diversion
To bring back certain memories Arousal
To remind me of happy times Surveillance
To remind me of someone Social interaction
To distract me
To help me concentrate on work
To help me get to sleep at night
To help me exercise
To dance to
To give me energy
To sing along to
To wake me up in the mornings
To socialize with friends
Melton and 1 414 >16 – 1 2 15 Ways of music use: 0
Galician (1987) I turn to popular music to feel less alone
I turn to popular music to change my mood
I turn to pop music to find out latest trends
I turn to pop music to relax
I turn to pop music to pass the time
I turn to pop music to sing along with artists
I turn to pop music for background noise
I turn to pop music to relieve boredom
I turn to pop music to forget my problems
I turn to pop music to get energized
I turn to pop music to hear my favorite artists
Radio stimulates my imagination
Radio portrays women favorably
Radio gives me violent feelings
Radio makes drug use attractive
(Continued)
The psychological functions of music listening
Source
(1: journal article,
2: book or book section)
Total N
M
SD
Kind of study
(1: in lab or university,
2: internet,
3: secondary,
4: field,
5: qualitative)
Selection of functions
(1: by face validity,
2: by literature research,
3: by survey, 4: n/a)
Number of functions
identified
Functions identified
Were functions reduced
to factors or dimensions?
(0: no, 1: based on theory,
2: based on factor/cluster
analysis)
Dimensions
(Continued)
www.frontiersin.org
Source
(1: journal article,
2: book or book section)
Total N
M
SD
Kind of study
(1: in lab or university,
2: internet,
3: secondary,
4: field,
5: qualitative)
Selection of functions
(1: by face validity,
2: by literature research,
3: by survey, 4: n/a)
Number of functions
identified
Functions identified
Were functions reduced
to factors or dimensions?
(0: no, 1: based on theory,
2: based on factor/cluster
analysis)
Dimensions
(Continued)
The psychological functions of music listening
Source
(1: journal article,
2: book or book section)
Total N
M
SD
Kind of study
(1: in lab or university,
2: internet,
3: secondary,
4: field,
5: qualitative)
Selection of functions
(1: by face validity,
2: by literature research,
3: by survey, 4: n/a)
Number of functions
identified
Functions identified
Were functions reduced
to factors or dimensions?
(0: no, 1: based on theory,
2: based on factor/cluster
analysis)
Dimensions
Sun and Lull 1 587 – – – 2 22 Motivations for viewing music videos: 2 Information/social
(1986) Information/social learning learning
Learn about self/others Passing time
Learn about future Escape/mood
Understand the world Social interaction
Supports my ideas
Learn how to do things
Factual information
Show me how to act
Passing time
Passes time when I am bored
Nothing better to do
Escape/mood
Relieves tension
Take my mind off things
Gets me in/keeps me in a mood
Get away from family
(Continued)
www.frontiersin.org
Source
(1: journal article,
2: book or book section)
Total N
M
SD
Kind of study
(1: in lab or university,
2: internet,
3: secondary,
4: field,
5: qualitative)
Selection of functions
(1: by face validity,
2: by literature research,
3: by survey, 4: n/a)
Number of functions
identified
Functions identified
Were functions reduced
to factors or dimensions?
(0: no, 1: based on theory,
2: based on factor/cluster
analysis)
Dimensions
Tarrant et al. 1 245 15.27 0.47 1 2 10 Enjoy the music 2 Self actualizing
(2000) Be creative/use imagination Fulfilling emotional
Relieve boredom needs
Help get trough difficult times Fulfilling social
Be popular with others needs
Relieve tension/stress
Create an image for self
Express feelings/emotions
Please friends
Reduce loneliness
Ter Bogt et al. 1 997 20.74 3.94 2 2 19 I am always looking for new music 1 Music importance
(2011) I know more than peers about music Mood
I influence my friends with my music taste enhancement
Can’t live without music Coping
Music makes other things less boring Identity
Music helps against boredom Social identity
Music creates a good atmosphere when with others
Music helps me to relax and stop thinking about things
Music helps me get through my life
With music I feel less lonely when alone
I always play music when I feel sad
With music I can vent aggression
I recognize myself in the lyrics of my favorite artists
Lyrics of my music often express how I feel
My favorite artists have ideas that appeal to me
(Continued)
The psychological functions of music listening
Source
(1: journal article,
2: book or book section)
Total N
M
SD
Kind of study
(1: in lab or university,
2: internet,
3: secondary,
4: field,
5: qualitative)
Selection of functions
(1: by face validity,
2: by literature research,
3: by survey, 4: n/a)
Number of functions
identified
Functions identified
Were functions reduced
to factors or dimensions?
(0: no, 1: based on theory,
2: based on factor/cluster
analysis)
Dimensions
Walker Kennedy 2 126 12–20 – 1 2 47 Forty-seven heterogeneous questions about music listening 2 Introspection
(2010) Identity-music
Discerning music
identity
Fantasy-rebellion
Identity-self
In some places, we could only provide exemplary functions because either the total number of functions was too large to be displayed here or not all functions were given in the original publications.
Table A3 | The 129 statements referring to the functions of music exhaustively derived from past research, together with their means,
standard deviations, and factor loadings (varimax rotated).
(Continued)
Table A3 | Continued
Because I like the bodily changes it evokes (changes of heartbeat, prickling, etc.)
[weil ich die körperlichen Wirkungen mag (Veränderung des Herzschlags, 3.33 2.02 0.483
Kribbeln auf der Haut usw.), die sie auslöst.]
Table A3 | Continued
Because it helps me show that I belong to a given social group. 1.30 1.62 0.726
[weil ich damit zeigen kann, dass ich einer bestimmten sozialen Gruppe angehöre.]
Because it makes me feel connected to all people who like the same kind of music.
[weil ich mich dann allen Leuten zugehörig fühle, die solche Musik hören.] 1.68 1.71 0.686
Because it helps me form friendships with people who have similar musical taste.
[weil sie mir hilft, Freundschaften mit Personen zu schließen, die einen 2.17 1.82 0.660
ähnlichen Musikgeschmack haben wie ich.]
(Continued)
Table A3 | Continued
Because when listening, I can imagine how the music would sound in a concert.
[weil ich mir dabei vorstellen kann, wie die Musik wohl im Konzert wäre.] 2.54 1.97 0.496
(Continued)
Table A3 | Continued
(Continued)
Table A3 | Continued
(Continued)
Table A3 | Continued
Dimension 1, self-awareness; Dimension 2, social relatedness; Dimension 3, arousal and mood regulation.