Author’s Accepted Manuscript image

Stem Cell Therapy in Necrotizing Enterocolitis:

Current State and Future Directions

Natalie A. Drucker, Christopher J. McCulloh, Bo Li,

Agostino Pierro, Gail E. Besner, Troy A. Markel

www.elsevier.com/locate/bios

PII: S1055-8586(17)30147-6
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1053/j.sempedsurg.2017.11.011
Reference: YSPSU50731
To appear in: Seminars in Pediatric Surgery
Cite this article as: Natalie A. Drucker, Christopher J. McCulloh, Bo Li,
Agostino Pierro, Gail E. Besner and Troy A. Markel, Stem Cell Therapy in
Necrotizing Enterocolitis: Current State and Future Directions, Seminars in
Pediatric Surgery,doi:10.1053/j.sempedsurg.2017.11.011
This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for
publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version
of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and
review of the resulting galley proof before it is published in its final citable
form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered
which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the
journal pertain.
 Stem Cell Therapy in Necrotizing Enterocolitis:
Current State and Future Directions

Natalie A. Drucker MD1, Christopher J. McCulloh MD2, Bo Li PhD3,

Agostino Pierro MD3, Gail E. Besner MD2, and Troy A. Markel MD1
1
Department of Surgery, Section of Pediatric Surgery, Riley Hospital for Children,
Indianapolis, IN
2
Department of Pediatric Surgery, Center for Perinatal Research, Nationwide
Children’s Hospital, Columbus, OH
3
Division of General and Thoracic Surgery, Translational Medicine Program, The
Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada

Disclosures: The authors have no relevant disclosures.

KEY WORDS

necrotizing enterocolitis, stem cell therapy, premature, neonatal, intestine, ischemia

Correspondence:
Troy A. Markel, MD
Assistant Professor of Surgery
Indiana University School of Medicine
Riley Hospital for Children at IU Health
705 Riley Hospital Dr.
RI 2500
Indianapolis, IN 46202
Phone: 317-437-2506
Fax: 317-274-4491
Abstract
Stem cell therapy is a promising treatment modality for necrotizing enterocolitis. Among

the many promising stem cells identified to date, it is likely that mesenchymal stem cells

will be the most useful and practical cell-based therapies for this condition. Using

acellular components such as exosomes or other paracrine mediators are promising as

well. Multiple mechanisms are likely at play in the positive effects provided by these

cells, and further research is underway to further elucidate these effects.

Introduction
 Necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) is a leading cause of death in premature infants,

with mortality remaining as high as 30% [1] . Despite extensive efforts to elucidate the

pathophysiology of the disease, and to identify potential treatments, mortality and

morbidity remain unacceptably high. Survivors are faced with lifelong complications

including short gut syndrome and neurological sequelae. Treatment options for infants

affected by NEC are limited to supportive care at diagnosis, with many babies

progressing to surgical intervention for resection of necrotic bowel. It is important to note

that although breast milk may reduce the incidence of NEC, it does not eliminate it [2].

Despite decades of research, a cure for the disease has still not been found.

The identification of potential treatments for NEC is still hampered by an

incomplete understanding of the precise pathogenesis of the disease. NEC is a disease

that predominantly affects premature infants, occurring most commonly after the

introduction of enteral feeding. Differences exist in microbial colonization of pre-term

infants and term infants, as well as those delivered vaginally and those delivered by

Caesarean-section [3]. The microbiome of infants who go on to develop NEC differs

from that of babies that do not develop the disease [4, 5]. In addition, the inflammatory

response is heightened in infants affected with NEC [6]. This combination of pro-

inflammatory and infectious components certainly contributes to the development of

disease.

Animal models of experimental NEC have been utilized over the decades to

examine different potential therapies for the disease, including stem cell (SC) therapy.

Stem cells have been shown in several disease models to have anti-inflammatory

properties and to lead to improvements in tissue health and function [7-9]. The ability of
SC to self-replicate, differentiate, prevent apoptosis and reduce inflammation has raised

interest in the potential therapeutic value of these cells in NEC.

Types of Stem Cells (Figure 1)

Early stem cell research focused on embryonic stem cells (ESC), totipotent cells

derived from embryos in mice [10]. Subsequent work showed that these same cells

could be derived from human embryos. These human ESC (hESC) were also totipotent,

however ethical concerns limited the research that could be done with hESC and

researchers continued to search for alternative sources of stem cells.

Bone Marrow-derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells (BM-MSC)

Bone marrow-derived cells have been studied extensively in both animals and

humans. They can be readily derived from human donors without being encumbered by

the ethical challenges faced by ESC. The culture process is straight-forward: marrow is

harvested from long bones of donors and placed into culture to select for MSC [11]. As

the cells are cultured, they must be passaged several times in order to minimize

contamination with hematopoietic precursors that are present in the initial marrow

sample. Confirmation of the presence of CD44 and CD90 on cells, and the absence of

cells expressing CD45, helps to confirm that the cell population of interest is composed

of MSC. BM-MSC derived from mice, rats and humans have been shown to be

effective in reducing the incidence and severity of NEC in mouse and rat models [11-

14].

Amniotic Fluid-derived Stem Cells

 The first report of successful culture and expansion of mesenchymal stem cells

from amniotic fluid (AF) was published in 2003 [15]. These cells not only express

surface markers typical of mesenchymal stem cells (MSC) such as CD29, CD44, and

CD90 among others, but they also express stage-specific embryonic antigen (SSEA)-4

and the transcription factor Oct4, both of which are associated with ESCs and not

MSCs, and help to ensure that the cells remain undifferentiated. It appears that AF-

MSCs may be closer to embryonic in nature than other types of MSCs, which may

contribute to their enhanced pluripotency and growth. De Coppi et al isolated human

and rodent amniotic fluid-derived stem (AFS) cells that express both embryonic and

adult stem cell markers [16]. AFS cells can be induced to form cells from all three germ

layers, but have not been demonstrated to be tumorigenic [17, 18].

In addition to their promising properties, collection and culture of AF-MSC is

straight-forward and easily translated to humans. These cells can be cultured from AF

samples collected during routine amniocentesis or at planned caesarean section [17,

18]. After collection, these cells can be cultured in media with few supplements and

grow rapidly and reliably [11]. In comparison to BM-MSC, AF-MSC grow significantly

faster and can be more easily and readily cultured and expanded into clinically useful

cell numbers.

Since their discovery, interest in these cells has remained high. Intraperitoneal

(IP) injection of AF derived stem cells has been shown to significantly reduce the

incidence and severity of NEC in a murine model [19]. Subsequent studies confirmed

that IP injection of these cells significantly decreases histologic injury and leads to

improved gut barrier function during experimental NEC [11, 20].

 Beneficial effects of AF have also been identified when experimental models

utilize whole AF without purification of AF-derived cells. Both mice and pigs that

received whole AF via enteral administration have significant protection from

experimental NEC [21, 22] The concentration of stem cells in whole AF is generally low,

on the order of 1-2% of cellular content, however this appears to be enough to have a

positive effect, with the fluid functioning as a modulator of inflammation in the gut [19,

22].

Other Birth-Associated Mesenchymal Stem Cells (U-MSC, P-MSC)

Both the umbilical cord and the placenta have been recently appreciated as

bountiful sources of mesenchymal stem cells. These cells are typically thought to be a

more primitive progenitor population compared to adult tissue-derived MSC [23].

Umbilical cord blood-derived MSC (U-MSC) can be isolated with relatively high

efficiency through cell culture, with best results noted from blood that is less than 15

hours old and with a total volume of over 33 mL [24]. Other groups have demonstrated

success with direct culture of pieces of the umbilical cord [25, 26]. U-MSC have been

shown to be as beneficial as other types of MSC in acute intestinal ischemia [27].

Placental MSC (P-MSC) are also relatively easy to obtain through culture of the

products of placenta tissue digestion. Like AF-MSC, these cells are positive for MSC

markers as well as typical ESC-associated cell markers, indicating their high potential

for differentiation [28]. Both U-MSC and P-MSC have been successful in preventing

injury in animal models of ischemia [29, 30]

 All birth-associated stem cell products represent a unique opportunity for

autologous cell use in at-risk infants. Potentially, these tissues could be harvested

during delivery of any premature infant or infant delivered via C-section for isolation and

preservation in preparation for future administration.

Amniotic Fluid-derived Neural Stem Cells (AF-NSC)

Although much research has focused on the use of MSC in NEC therapy, there

are significant changes to the enteric nervous system (ENS) that occur during the

development of NEC [31]. This has led to the investigation of neural stem cells (NSC)

as a therapy for NEC. NSC can be cultured and isolated from AF and selectively grown.

The culture process is somewhat more complicated than that of AF-MSC, and the cells

do not grow as quickly. In brief, AF is collected in a similar fashion as for AF-MSC. The

culture medium into which the cells are placed is significantly different for AF-NSC – the

presence of epidermal growth factor (EGF) and fibroblast growth factor (FGF) helps to

ensure that NSCs remain in an undifferentiated state [11]. This process also helps to

minimize the likelihood of survival of other SC that are present in AF. As the cells

develop and grow, they begin to aggregate into neurospheres, which contain

predominantly NSC. These neurospheres can be mechanically separated to isolate

individual NSC. These cells tend to grow more slowly than MSC, and it can take several

weeks before usable quantities of cells are available. After culturing, AF-NSC identity

can be confirmed by the expression of nestin, an intermediate filament protein present

in developing NSC but downregulated when the cells become mature neural cells [32].
AF-NSC have been shown to have beneficial effects in animal models of ENS-based

conditions such as Hirschsprung disease, and are also effective at reducing the

incidence and severity of experimental NEC when injected IP [11].

Enteric Neural Stem Cells (E-NSC)

The complexity of the ENS and its interactions with the central nervous system

(CNS) have become better understood in recent years, with a very high concentration of

nerve endings and NSC located within the gut [33]. ENS abnormalities have been

identified in infants diagnosed with NEC [31]. Interestingly, these ENS abnormalities

last long after recovery from the acute NEC event.

E-NSC derived from the gut have similar properties to AF-NSC, and the culture

medium used to support the growth of the cells is of the same composition. E-NSC are

somewhat more challenging to obtain, with current experimental protocols purifying

these cells through a combination of mechanical and enzymatic digestion of the gut to

obtain E-NSC from the muscular layer of the small intestine [11]. After digestion, the

cells are placed into culture to allow NSC to replicate and form neurospheres. These

neurospheres can then be mechanically separated to yield individual NSC, which can

be confirmed positive for nestin expression. E-NSC administered IP have been shown

in several studies to be beneficial in treating experimental NEC and improving gut

barrier function in these animals [11, 20, 31, 34].

Stem Cell Mechanisms of Action (Figure 2)

Migration and Engraftment

Stem cells have the unique ability to migrate and home to injured tissues and

organs. Additionally, because stem cells are multipotent, they are able to differentiate

into multiple cell types, including intestinal epithelia, endothelia, and connective tissue

cells [16, 35, 36]. Therefore, stem cell transplantation may contribute to repair directly

by integrating into the damaged tissue and replacing the injured cells.

Stem cells can travel to a wide variety of tissues with a high level of engraftment,

particularly in the presence of injury or inflammation; however, the mechanism of this

phenomenon is not yet fully understood [37]. It is possible that injured tissues express

specific receptors or ligands that facilitate trafficking, adhesion, and infiltration of stem

cells to the site of injury [38]. The intestine of premature neonates with NEC responds to

injury by activating molecular pathways that increase the release of inflammatory

mediators, tissue chemokines, and chemokine receptors, which may attract stem cells

to the damaged intestine, where they may home and differentiate [39].

In normal rat pups, the intra-peritoneal administration of AFS cells leads to the

migration, homing and integration of AF-MSC into the intestine, kidneys, liver, and

spleen [40]. In the rat pup NEC model, within 48 to 72 hours after intraperitoneal

injection, the AFS cells adhered to the mesentery and migrated to the intestinal serosa,

smooth muscle, submucosal layers, and to the villi. Colonization with AFS cells

occurred almost exclusively in the intestine of the pups with experimental NEC,

indicating that AFS cells preferentially localize to damaged tissue [19]. Similarly, a

previous study in experimental NEC demonstrated that intra-peritoneal administration of

human BM-MSC exhibited high engraftment in the injured intestine resulting in reduced

intestinal damage [13]. Once cells are engrafted, they can either directly differentiate to

replace damaged cells, or interact with native intestinal stem cells (ISC) to upregulate

the Wnt/β-catenin pathway as discussed below, which promotes auto-regeneration of

intestinal epithelium [19].

Paracrine Effects

Although stem cells have a systemic distribution and integration into tissues, the

beneficial effects seen after administration occur within hours of injection at a time when

the amount of stem cells in the intestine is still relatively low. It seems more likely that

the SC secrete anti-inflammatory mediators that enhance the host tissue’s ability to

repair itself [8]. SC may act indirectly via the release of factors that support the

regeneration of damaged cells, suggesting a predominantly paracrine effect [13, 19].

This has been shown in models of NEC and in numerous other disease processes

including neurologic injury, ischemia-reperfusion injury [8, 9].

Most studies of SC efficacy have examined individual cell types in their ability to

protect the intestines from NEC. However, given the observation that these cells appear

to function through reducing inflammation, it is possible that cells harvested from

different tissues may ultimately have similar effects. In ischemia/reperfusion injury, BM-

MSC and umbilical cord U-MSC were shown to have similar effects [27]. When

comparing AF-MSC, BM-MSC, AF-NSC, and E-NSC in a rodent model, all four cell

types equivalently reduced the incidence and severity of experimental NEC [11]. These
studies support the notion that there may be mediators common to multiple SC types

that are responsible for their beneficial effects.

Conditioned media can be generated by placing stem cells into culture for

several days, allowing their extracellular products to accumulate in the media, and then

centrifuging to remove the cells. In animals that received an IP injection of this

conditioned medium, a statistically significant reduction in NEC was observed

equivalent to the reduction seen when animals were treated with the same kind of SC

[19].

Zani et al have shown that AFS cells may act via a paracrine mechanism related

to cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) activity [19]. An increased migration of COX-2+ cells into

the crypts was observed after AFS cell injection, which was inversely correlated with

intestinal damage. Furthermore, COX-2 inhibitors abolished the protective effects of

AFS cells, confirming that AFS cells act in a COX-2-dependant manner to attenuate the

NEC injury [19].

Similarly, BM-MSC produce many soluble mediators such as cytokines, growth

factors, microRNAs, and exosomes [41], which may be responsible for their beneficial

effect of attenuating the NEC related injury. It has been shown that MSCs can increase

intestinal epithelial cell viability and proliferative capacity via the paracrine release of IL-

6, HGF, and VEGF, after hypoxic injury [42].

Stem cell-derived exosomes are nanovesicles 30-100 nm in size that are

released by exocytosis into the extracellular space and can be purified from conditioned

media through commercially available kits or by differential ultracentrifugation [43, 44].

They contain various types of RNA (including microRNAs important in post-translational

gene regulation), DNA, and protein, and are important paracrine factors mediating cell-

cell and cell-environment communication [45, 46]. Recently, Rager et al. isolated

exosomes from BM-MSCs and tested their effects in a neonatal rat model of NEC.

They found a reduction in incidence and severity of NEC as well as preserved gut

barrier function [12]. Stem Cell derived exosomes also function as mediators of

inflammation [44].

Further work is needed to understand the precise mechanisms by which SC and

SC-derived exosomes exert their beneficial effects in NEC. It may be possible to identify

specific components in the extracellular milieu or within the nanovesicles that are the

driving factors in these effects. These components could subsequently be isolated and

purified and used therapeutically without the theoretical risks associated with stem cell

based therapies.

Heterotopic Cell Fusion

Heterotopic cell fusion is a third mechanism by which stem cells may provide

their beneficial effects. It occurs when two cells from different lineages merge into one

cell, transmitting information and mediators in the process [47]. Fusion has been

demonstrated with BM-MSC and hepatocytes, Purkinje neurons, and cardiac myocytes

[48], but the data in intestinal injury have not been convincing. Some studies have

demonstrated fusion events between BM-MSC and intestinal epithelial cells [49],

however others have noted that this is so rare that it is likely not the mechanism by

which these cells are providing protective effects [50].

Beneficial Effects of Stem Cells

Preservation of Intestinal Barrier Function

While the mechanisms are still in question, stem cells certainly provide significant

benefit to the intestine in NEC. The intestinal epithelium is the most important barrier

preventing the passage of foreign antigens and toxins from the external environment

into the systemic circulation [51]. Preterm infants have diminished intestinal barrier

function, leading to increased intestinal permeability. This may allow pathogens to

translocate from the intestinal lumen and trigger the exuberant inflammatory response

that characterizes NEC [52].

One of the potential beneficial effects of stem cell administration in NEC is the

reestablishment of intestinal epithelial integrity. In the rat pup NEC model, all four stem

cell types preserve and maintain intestinal epithelial integrity [20]. Previous studies have

demonstrated that heparin-binding EGF-like growth factor (HB-EGF) promotes neural

stem cell (NSC) proliferation and migration, and that both HB-EGF and NSC reduce

intestinal injury, improve gut barrier function, and enhance intestinal motility in

experimental NEC [34]. In addition, BM-MSC and BM-MSC-derived exosomes preserve

intestinal permeability during NEC induction [12, 13]. MSC administration reduces

bacterial translocation in NEC, indicating the protective role MSCs have in barrier

function [13]. Similarly, AFS cell administration during experimental NEC improves

intestinal barrier function and attenuates intestinal injury [19].

Attenuation of Inflammation

Inflammation is an important contributing factor in the pathogenesis of NEC [53].

TLR4 signalling in the gut is required to maintain intestinal homeostasis and triggers the

immune response to Gram-negative bacterial translocation. Activated TLR4 signalling is

associated with NEC in mice, rats, and premature infants [54, 55]. AFS cells have been

shown to reduce gut inflammation during NEC, however the mechanism of this action is

not fully understood [19]. Stem cells secrete a wide variety of cytokines and

chemokines that have beneficial actions during tissue repair [56, 57], to offset TLR4-

induced intestinal inflammation [58, 59]. MSC also reduce gut inflammation and

epithelium damage during NEC induction [13].

Promotion of Intestinal Regeneration

To maintain the integrity and viability of the epithelial layer, intestinal epithelial

cells are in constant turnover and are replenished by intestinal stem cells (ISC). These

cells, located in the intestinal crypts, are rapidly proliferating and critical for the intestinal

epithelial regeneration that follows injury [60-62]. The ISC population is depleted in NEC

proportionally to the severity of intestinal damage, indicating the crucial role of ISC in

intestinal repair [63, 64]. AFS cells enhance enterocyte proliferation and improve

epithelial regeneration [19], indicating cross-talk between exogenous stem cells and

endogenous ISC.
 NEC is associated with Wnt/β-catenin pathway dysfunction; this pathway is

required for ISC function and gut epithelial maintenance [19, 65]. AFS cell

administration led to upregulation of gene expression of the Wnt/β-catenin pathway,

suggesting that this could be a potential mechanism by which AFS cells contribute to

intestinal regeneration [19]. Similarly, MSCs have been shown to upregulate growth

factors which protect intestinal stem cells, maintain gut epithelial regeneration and

reduce mucosal injury [14, 66].

Clinical Applications

Premature infants have relatively high levels of circulating hematopoietic stem

cells at birth compared to term infants[67]. Since stem cells protect and heal injured

tissues, those babies with suboptimal cell counts may be at increased risk for

developing NEC. Relative stem cell deficiency could be due to an overall paucity of

stem cells, dysfunctional stem cells, or an inability to mobilize functional stem cells to

areas of injury. Mouse studies have demonstrated an increase in circulating stem cells

after major intestinal resection or injury, indicating that stem cell mobilization is a native

protective response in this patient population [68]. Therefore, it is reasonable to expect

that providing exogenous stem cells to affected patients would promote intestinal

healing and decreased injury during NEC [35, 69].

Route of Administration

Based on previous studies in both NEC and intestinal ischemia-reperfusion

injury, direct application of cellular therapy to injured or at-risk bowel may be more
optimal compared to systemic intravenous or intraarterial administration [70-72]. As

previously discussed, a likely mechanism of action of the stem cells is through the

paracrine release of vital mediators. Thus, applying the stem cells directly to the injured

bowel may be the most effective way to deliver the cell products at the highest local

concentrations and improve recovery in the injured intestine [42].

In previous human studies for other conditions, systemic adverse effects such as

infections and viral reactivation secondary to immune suppression occurred less

frequently with local application of cells as compared to systemic application [73, 74].

Although both IP and intravenous (IV) routes of administration had equivalent efficacy in

an animal model, many cells become entrapped in the lungs after IV injection, leading to

a reduction in the number of cells available for therapeutic purposes [14, 75, 76].

Patient Selection-Therapy

The significant variation in NEC disease course makes decisions regarding

timing of treatment with cellular therapy difficult [77]. Ideally, stem cell therapy would be

provided to infants who have definitive NEC but who have not progressed to the point of

requiring surgical intervention. Currently this would include Bell’s Stages II A, II B, and

IIIA. However, given that many infants with stage IIA NEC recover with observation and

bowel rest alone, the use of stem cell therapy in infants with non-surgical NEC beyond

stage IIA may be considered optimal to limit progression of disease.

Although infants who present with perforation require surgical resection of the

perforated and necrotic segments, they also may be able to be treated with stem cell

therapy for other areas of the intestine that appear marginally ischemic at the time of
surgery. Optimal patients for initial trials would be those with marginally ischemic bowel

who will require reassessment at a second-look operation [35, 77]. Since these infants

already require multiple operations, no additional procedure would be needed to directly

administer stem cells or to monitor their effects. Goals of therapy in this group would be

to mitigate ongoing ischemia and necrosis and avoid the need for further resection at

the second look operation. These patients represent an important subset of the

population who could most benefit from this therapy, and would be an ideal first patient

population to study.

Patient Selection-Prophylaxis

The prophylactic administration of stem cells to extremely premature infants with

high risk for development of NEC could also be considered. A recent systematic review

of prognostic studies identified many risk factors for NEC. Significant prognostic factors

identified in multivariable analysis included low birth weight, early gestational age,

sepsis, ethnicity, hypotension, outborn status, need for assisted ventilation, premature

rupture of membranes, and small size for gestational age. Low birth weight (≤1500g)

was the most commonly reported prognostic factor, which is likely linked to gestational

age (studies varied from <36 weeks to <26 weeks) [78]. If prophylactic or early stage

therapy were to be considered, these risk factors would be useful in determining the

most at-risk population.

Ethically, however, it would be challenging to justify the administration of cellular

therapy to patients without definitive disease due to the perceived risks of tumorigenicity

and immunogenicity as discussed below. Importantly, as discussed previously,

acellular therapy could be administered without risk of these complications associated

with cellular formulations. Because it is very likely that stem cells are acting in a

paracrine fashion, delivery of exosomes or another secreted mediator could be equally

effective, as shown in animal models [12, 44].

Use of Stem cell therapy for treatment of long-term NEC sequelae

Another important use of stem cell therapy would be in preventing or treating

short bowel syndrome (SBS), often a long-term complication of NEC secondary to

extensive bowel resection [69]. Unfortunately, despite surgical techniques such as the

serial transverse enteroplasty and Bianchi procedures, which are aimed at lengthening

the intestine and expanding the functional epithelial surface area, SBS remains a

difficult disease to manage. Rehabilitation of injured bowel and/or integration of new

functional bowel into an SBS patient would be groundbreaking.

Stem cell therapy alone may be able to improve intestinal epithelial absorptive

function and bowel adaption, both of which are extremely important in recovery from

SBS [35, 79]. For more severe cases, a stem cell-engrafted neo-intestine could be

considered to provide length either at the time of initial resection or later in treatment, to

allow the SBS patient to achieve freedom from parenteral nutrition [79]. A promising

study in rats has demonstrated the feasibility of creating decellularized small bowel,

leaving the villus-crypt architecture intact and able to be repopulated with new intestinal

stem cells [80]. Intestinal organoids have been cultured in-vitro and subsequently

administered back to rats, thereby resulting in renewal and repair of the grafted

intestinal epithelium [81].

 The creation of these decellularized grafts led to development of functional

tissue-engineered small intestines which have been anastomosed with native bowel in

piglets. Graft therapy resulted in weight gain and improved recovery after bowel

resection [82]. More recently, a study in dogs demonstrated that intestinal crypt cultures

can grow and differentiate into functional, vascularized bowel on 3D synthetic

tubularized villous structures, and this neo-intestine can integrate into existing intestine

and support native mucosal regeneration [83].

Human cadaver donor intestine has also been decellularized and reconstituted

with BM-MSC. The neo-intestine was found to have epithelial, smooth muscle, and

endothelial cells and morphology similar to normal intestine [84]. While these haven’t

been re-implanted into humans yet, the results are quite promising.

Safety Considerations

Tumorigenicity is a major concern in stem cell therapy. The same molecular

pathways that allow a cell to be pluripotent are involved in tumorigenicity, and therefore

more differentiated stem cells have a lower risk of this complication. Stem cells with a

capacity for rapid growth but a low incidence of spontaneous differentiation are ideal for

avoiding these complications. Neither AF-MSC nor BM-MSC have been shown to have

high tumor formation potential in animal models [17, 18, 85, 86]. In fact, a recent

systematic review looking at 36 clinical trials found no association between MSC

administration and de novo tumor formation or increased susceptibility to infection [87].

This meta-analysis suggests the potential benefit of MSC therapy outweighs the
potential risk, and that these theoretical risks may be less significant than previously

believed.

Alternatively, recent work has indicated that human pluripotent stem cells have

the capacity to develop loss-of-homozygosity mutations at the p53 locus, potentially

increasing risk of cancer formation and demonstrating that comprehensive genetic

testing may be necessary before cell therapy [88].

Immunogenicity is another potential adverse outcome of stem cell therapy. It can

be reduced by autologous cell transfer or use of stem cells that have low expression of

major histocompatibility complex (MHC) such as MSC [89]. Nevertheless, these risks

cannot be eliminated, and thus the risks and benefits of this therapy need to be carefully

considered.

Lastly, intravenous administration of stem cells has been demonstrated to cause

trapping of cells within the lung parenchyma with sarcoma like lesions in the lungs in

mice [90, 91]. Fortunately, this effect is lessened with intraperitoneal administration,

another factor in favor of direct application.

Future Directions

The collective goal of clinicians and translational researchers in the field of stem

cell therapy for the treatment of NEC is to progress to human clinical trials for stem cell

delivery. There are several limitations to overcome before this can become a reality.

First, regulatory hurdles to ensure safety for an extremely vulnerable population will

need to be carefully addressed.

 Secondly, as discussed earlier, it is challenging to determine which patients will

benefit the most from this therapy. We would propose starting first with the surgical

NEC population, Bell’s stage III – those patients who require one or multiple trips to the

operating room for bowel resection. The stem cell therapy could be delivered directly to

injured bowel intraoperatively and assessed at future operations or by clinical

improvement in the patients. In this population, there is little risk of providing

unnecessary treatment, with great potential for benefit.

A third concern is the long-term implications of cellular therapy as discussed

above. The ability of these cells to transform into malignant cells over time has been a

long-time concern, despite evidence that the therapeutic benefits likely outweigh these

risks [86].

Lastly, we still do not understand the full extent of their mechanisms of action. If

stem cells protect by paracrine mechanisms, which factors are most important? How

many factors need to be present? And most importantly, if paracrine factors are the key

to protection, could an acellular cocktail be made of these factors to avoid the need for a

cellular based therapy altogether? These questions need to be answered before

widespread clinical use.

Conclusions

Stem cell therapy is promising as a treatment for necrotizing enterocolitis. It is

likely that AF derived stem cells or BM-MSC will be the most useful and practical cell-

based therapies for this condition. Acellular therapies such as exosomes or other

paracrine mediators still to be identified are promising as well. Multiple mechanisms are
likely at play in the positive effects provided by these cells, and further research is

underway to fully understand these. Moving to human clinical trials is feasible and

reasonable, and with good patient selection, success is anticipated.

Figure Legends

Figure 1. Different types of stem cells available for NEC treatment. Embryonic, while

able to differentiate into any tissue, are not used due to ethical concerns with their

procurement from the inner mass of the blastocyst of human embryos. Amniotic fluid

can give rise to embryonic stem cells as well. Both mesenchymal stem cells and neural

stem cells have been used with success in animal models of NEC.

Figure 2. Mechanisms by which mesenchymal stem cells work to protect the intestine

against NEC. Beneficial effects provided by stem cells are likely achieved through one

or more of these pathways. A) MSC homing, engraftment and differentiation. B)

Paracrine release of anti-inflammatory mediators, exosomes, microRNA, and/or

cytokines. C) Heterotopic cell fusion with direct transfer of cellular biomaterials.

References

[1] Neu J, Walker WA. Necrotizing enterocolitis. The New England journal of medicine
2011;364(3):255-64.
[2] Herrmann K, Carroll K. An exclusively human milk diet reduces necrotizing enterocolitis.
Breastfeed Med 2014;9(4):184-90.
[3] Li QY, An Y, Liu L, Wang XQ, Chen S, Wang ZL, et al. Differences in the Clinical Characteristics of
Early- and Late-Onset Necrotizing Enterocolitis in Full-Term Infants: A Retrospective Case-
Control Study. Scientific reports 2017;7:43042.
[4] Coggins SA, Wynn JL, Weitkamp JH. Infectious causes of necrotizing enterocolitis. Clinics in
perinatology 2015;42(1):133-54, ix.
[5] Warner BB, Deych E, Zhou Y, Hall-Moore C, Weinstock GM, Sodergren E, et al. Gut bacteria
dysbiosis and necrotising enterocolitis in very low birthweight infants: a prospective case-
control study. Lancet 2016;387(10031):1928-36.
[6] Sharma R, Tepas JJ, 3rd, Hudak ML, Mollitt DL, Wludyka PS, Teng RJ, et al. Neonatal gut barrier
and multiple organ failure: role of endotoxin and proinflammatory cytokines in sepsis and
necrotizing enterocolitis. Journal of pediatric surgery 2007;42(3):454-61.
[7] Diaco N, Diamandis Z, Borlongan C. Amniotic fluid-derived stem cells as an effective cell source
for transplantation therapy in stroke. Brain Circ 2015;1(2):119.
[8] Galindo LT, Filippo TR, Semedo P, Ariza CB, Moreira CM, Camara NO, et al. Mesenchymal stem
cell therapy modulates the inflammatory response in experimental traumatic brain injury.
Neurol Res Int 2011;2011:564089.
[9] Rowart P, Erpicum P, Detry O, Weekers L, Gregoire C, Lechanteur C, et al. Mesenchymal Stromal
Cell Therapy in Ischemia/Reperfusion Injury. J Immunol Res 2015;2015:602597.
[10] Bongso A, Richards M. History and perspective of stem cell research. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet
Gynaecol 2004;18(6):827-42.
[11] McCulloh CJ, Olson JK, Zhou Y, Wang Y, Besner GE. Stem cells and necrotizing enterocolitis: A
direct comparison of the efficacy of multiple types of stem cells. Journal of pediatric surgery
2017;52(6):999-1005.
[12] Rager TM, Olson JK, Zhou Y, Wang Y, Besner GE. Exosomes secreted from bone marrow-derived
mesenchymal stem cells protect the intestines from experimental necrotizing enterocolitis.
Journal of pediatric surgery 2016;51(6):942-7.
[13] Tayman C, Uckan D, Kilic E, Ulus AT, Tonbul A, Murat Hirfanoglu I, et al. Mesenchymal stem cell
therapy in necrotizing enterocolitis: a rat study. Pediatr Res 2011;70(5):489-94.
[14] Yang J, Watkins D, Chen CL, Bhushan B, Zhou Y, Besner GE. Heparin-binding epidermal growth
factor-like growth factor and mesenchymal stem cells act synergistically to prevent experimental
necrotizing enterocolitis. J Am Coll Surg 2012;215(4):534-45.
[15] PS. itA. Amniotic fluid as a novel source of mesenchymal stem cells for therapeutic
transplantation. Blood 2003;102(4):1548-9.
[16] De Coppi P, Bartsch G, Jr., Siddiqui MM, Xu T, Santos CC, Perin L, et al. Isolation of amniotic stem
cell lines with potential for therapy. Nat Biotechnol 2007;25(1):100-6.
[17] Bottai D, Cigognini D, Nicora E, Moro M, Grimoldi MG, Adami R, et al. Third trimester amniotic
fluid cells with the capacity to develop neural phenotypes and with heterogeneity among sub-
populations. Restor Neurol Neurosci 2012;30(1):55-68.
[18] Murphy SV, Atala A. Amniotic fluid and placental membranes: unexpected sources of highly
multipotent cells. Semin Reprod Med 2013;31(1):62-8.
[19] Zani A, Cananzi M, Fascetti-Leon F, Lauriti G, Smith VV, Bollini S, et al. Amniotic fluid stem cells
improve survival and enhance repair of damaged intestine in necrotising enterocolitis via a COX-
2 dependent mechanism. Gut 2014;63(2):300-9.
[20] McCulloh CJ, Olson JK, Wang Y, Vu J, Gartner S, Besner GE. Evaluating the efficacy of different
types of stem cells in preserving gut barrier function in necrotizing enterocolitis. The Journal of
surgical research 2017;214:278-85.
[21] Good M, Siggers RH, Sodhi CP, Afrazi A, Alkhudari F, Egan CE, et al. Amniotic fluid inhibits Toll-
like receptor 4 signaling in the fetal and neonatal intestinal epithelium. Proceedings of the
National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 2012;109(28):11330-5.
[22] Siggers J, Ostergaard MV, Siggers RH, Skovgaard K, Molbak L, Thymann T, et al. Postnatal
amniotic fluid intake reduces gut inflammatory responses and necrotizing enterocolitis in
preterm neonates. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 2013;304(10):G864-75.
[23] Broxmeyer HE, Douglas GW, Hangoc G, Cooper S, Bard J, English D, et al. Human umbilical cord
blood as a potential source of transplantable hematopoietic stem/progenitor cells. Proceedings
of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 1989;86(10):3828-32.
[24] Bieback K, Kern S, Kluter H, Eichler H. Critical parameters for the isolation of mesenchymal stem
cells from umbilical cord blood. Stem cells 2004;22(4):625-34.
[25] Dehkordi MB, Madjd Z, Chaleshtori MH, Meshkani R, Nikfarjam L, Kajbafzadeh AM. A Simple,
Rapid, and Efficient Method for Isolating Mesenchymal Stem Cells from the Entire Umbilical
Cord. Cell Transplant 2016;25(7):1287-97.
[26] Hassan G, Kasem I, Soukkarieh C, Aljamali M. A Simple Method to Isolate and Expand Human
Umbilical Cord Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells: Using Explant Method and Umbilical Cord
Blood Serum. Int J Stem Cells 2017.
[27] Jensen AR, Manning MM, Khaneki S, Drucker NA, Markel TA. Harvest tissue source does not
alter the protective power of stromal cell therapy after intestinal ischemia and reperfusion
injury. The Journal of surgical research 2016;204(2):361-70.
[28] Yen BL, Huang HI, Chien CC, Jui HY, Ko BS, Yao M, et al. Isolation of multipotent cells from
human term placenta. Stem cells 2005;23(1):3-9.
[29] Watkins DJ, Yang J, Matthews MA, Besner GE. Synergistic effects of HB-EGF and mesenchymal
stem cells in a murine model of intestinal ischemia/reperfusion injury. Journal of pediatric
surgery 2013;48(6):1323-9.
[30] Koponen JK, Kekarainen T, S EH, Laitinen A, Nystedt J, Laine J, et al. Umbilical cord blood-derived
progenitor cells enhance muscle regeneration in mouse hindlimb ischemia model. Molecular
therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy 2007;15(12):2172-7.
[31] Zhou Y, Yang J, Watkins DJ, Boomer LA, Matthews MA, Su Y, et al. Enteric nervous system
abnormalities are present in human necrotizing enterocolitis: potential neurotransplantation
therapy. Stem Cell Res Ther 2013;4(6):157.
[32] Lendahl U, Zimmerman LB, McKay RD. CNS stem cells express a new class of intermediate
filament protein. Cell 1990;60(4):585-95.
[33] Mayer EA. Gut feelings: the emerging biology of gut-brain communication. Nat Rev Neurosci
2011;12(8):453-66.
[34] Wei J, Zhou Y, Besner GE. Heparin-binding EGF-like growth factor and enteric neural stem cell
transplantation in the prevention of experimental necrotizing enterocolitis in mice. Pediatr Res
2015;78(1):29-37.
[35] Markel TA, Crisostomo PR, Lahm T, Novotny NM, Rescorla FJ, Tector J, et al. Stem cells as a
potential future treatment of pediatric intestinal disorders. Journal of pediatric surgery
2008;43(11):1953-63.
[36] Matsumoto T, Okamoto R, Yajima T, Mori T, Okamoto S, Ikeda Y, et al. Increase of bone marrow-
derived secretory lineage epithelial cells during regeneration in the human intestine.
Gastroenterology 2005;128(7):1851-67.
[37] Allers C, Sierralta WD, Neubauer S, Rivera F, Minguell JJ, Conget PA. Dynamic of distribution of
human bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells after transplantation into adult
unconditioned mice. Transplantation 2004;78(4):503-8.
[38] Sordi V. Mesenchymal stem cell homing capacity. Transplantation 2009;87(9 Suppl):S42-5.
[39] Lin PW, Nasr TR, Stoll BJ. Necrotizing enterocolitis: recent scientific advances in pathophysiology
and prevention. Semin Perinatol 2008;32(2):70-82.
[40] Ghionzoli M, Cananzi M, Zani A, Rossi CA, Leon FF, Pierro A, et al. Amniotic fluid stem cell
migration after intraperitoneal injection in pup rats: implication for therapy. Pediatric surgery
international 2010;26(1):79-84.
[41] Bruno S, Collino F, Tetta C, Camussi G. Dissecting paracrine effectors for mesenchymal stem
cells. Adv Biochem Eng Biotechnol 2013;129:137-52.
[42] Weil BR, Markel TA, Herrmann JL, Abarbanell AM, Meldrum DR. Mesenchymal stem cells
enhance the viability and proliferation of human fetal intestinal epithelial cells following hypoxic
injury via paracrine mechanisms. Surgery 2009;146(2):190-7.
[43] Lasser C. Exosomal RNA as biomarkers and the therapeutic potential of exosome vectors. Expert
Opin Biol Ther 2012;12 Suppl 1:S189-97.
[44] Lo Sicco C, Reverberi D, Balbi C, Ulivi V, Principi E, Pascucci L, et al. Mesenchymal Stem Cell-
Derived Extracellular Vesicles as Mediators of Anti-Inflammatory Effects: Endorsement of
Macrophage Polarization. Stem cells translational medicine 2017;6(3):1018-28.
[45] Pegtel DM, Cosmopoulos K, Thorley-Lawson DA, van Eijndhoven MA, Hopmans ES, Lindenberg
JL, et al. Functional delivery of viral miRNAs via exosomes. Proceedings of the National Academy
of Sciences of the United States of America 2010;107(14):6328-33.
[46] Thery C. Exosomes: secreted vesicles and intercellular communications. F1000 Biol Rep
2011;3:15.
[47] Doster DL, Jensen AR, Khaneki S, Markel TA. Mesenchymal stromal cell therapy for the
treatment of intestinal ischemia: Defining the optimal cell isolate for maximum therapeutic
benefit. Cytotherapy 2016;18(12):1457-70.
[48] Alvarez-Dolado M, Pardal R, Garcia-Verdugo JM, Fike JR, Lee HO, Pfeffer K, et al. Fusion of bone-
marrow-derived cells with Purkinje neurons, cardiomyocytes and hepatocytes. Nature
2003;425(6961):968-73.
[49] Davies PS, Powell AE, Swain JR, Wong MH. Inflammation and proliferation act together to
mediate intestinal cell fusion. PLoS One 2009;4(8):e6530.
[50] de Jong JH, Rodermond HM, Zimberlin CD, Lascano V, De Sousa EMF, Richel DJ, et al. Fusion of
intestinal epithelial cells with bone marrow derived cells is dispensable for tissue homeostasis.
Scientific reports 2012;2:271.
[51] Groschwitz KR, Hogan SP. Intestinal barrier function: molecular regulation and disease
pathogenesis. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2009;124(1):3-20; quiz 1-2.
[52] Halpern MD, Denning PW. The role of intestinal epithelial barrier function in the development of
NEC. Tissue Barriers 2015;3(1-2):e1000707.
[53] Kandasamy J, Huda S, Ambalavanan N, Jilling T. Inflammatory signals that regulate intestinal
epithelial renewal, differentiation, migration and cell death: Implications for necrotizing
enterocolitis. Pathophysiology 2014;21(1):67-80.
[54] Lu P, Sodhi CP, Hackam DJ. Toll-like receptor regulation of intestinal development and
inflammation in the pathogenesis of necrotizing enterocolitis. Pathophysiology 2014;21(1):81-
93.
[55] Arciero J, Bard Ermentrout G, Siggers R, Afrazi A, Hackam D, Vodovotz Y, et al. Modeling the
interactions of bacteria and Toll-like receptor-mediated inflammation in necrotizing
enterocolitis. Journal of theoretical biology 2013;321:83-99.
[56] Gnecchi M, Melo LG. Bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells: isolation, expansion,
characterization, viral transduction, and production of conditioned medium. Methods Mol Biol
2009;482:281-94.
[57] Haynesworth SE, Baber MA, Caplan AI. Cytokine expression by human marrow-derived
mesenchymal progenitor cells in vitro: effects of dexamethasone and IL-1 alpha. J Cell Physiol
1996;166(3):585-92.
[58] Spees JL, Lee RH, Gregory CA. Mechanisms of mesenchymal stem/stromal cell function. Stem
Cell Res Ther 2016;7(1):125.
[59] Prockop DJ. Concise review: two negative feedback loops place mesenchymal stem/stromal cells
at the center of early regulators of inflammation. Stem cells 2013;31(10):2042-6.
[60] Barker N, van Es JH, Kuipers J, Kujala P, van den Born M, Cozijnsen M, et al. Identification of
stem cells in small intestine and colon by marker gene Lgr5. Nature 2007;449(7165):1003-7.
[61] Metcalfe C, Kljavin NM, Ybarra R, de Sauvage FJ. Lgr5+ stem cells are indispensable for radiation-
induced intestinal regeneration. Cell Stem Cell 2014;14(2):149-59.
[62] Li B, Lee C, Filler T, Hock A, Wu RY, Li Q, et al. Inhibition of corticotropin-releasing hormone
receptor 1 and activation of receptor 2 protect against colonic injury and promote epithelium
repair. Scientific reports 2017;7:46616.
[63] Afrazi A, Branca MF, Sodhi CP, Good M, Yamaguchi Y, Egan CE, et al. Toll-like receptor 4-
mediated endoplasmic reticulum stress in intestinal crypts induces necrotizing enterocolitis. J
Biol Chem 2014;289(14):9584-99.
[64] Neal MD, Richardson WM, Sodhi CP, Russo A, Hackam DJ. Intestinal stem cells and their roles
during mucosal injury and repair. The Journal of surgical research 2011;167(1):1-8.
[65] Sodhi CP, Shi XH, Richardson WM, Grant ZS, Shapiro RA, Prindle T, Jr., et al. Toll-like receptor-4
inhibits enterocyte proliferation via impaired beta-catenin signaling in necrotizing enterocolitis.
Gastroenterology 2010;138(1):185-96.
[66] Chen CL, Yu X, James IO, Zhang HY, Yang J, Radulescu A, et al. Heparin-binding EGF-like growth
factor protects intestinal stem cells from injury in a rat model of necrotizing enterocolitis. Lab
Invest 2012;92(3):331-44.
[67] Bizzarro MJ, Bhandari V, Krause DS, Smith BR, Gross I. Circulating stem cells in extremely
preterm neonates. Acta paediatrica 2007;96(4):521-5.
[68] Dekaney CM, Fong JJ, Rigby RJ, Lund PK, Henning SJ, Helmrath MA. Expansion of intestinal stem
cells associated with long-term adaptation following ileocecal resection in mice. Am J Physiol
Gastrointest Liver Physiol 2007;293(5):G1013-22.
[69] Zani A, De Coppi P. Stem cell therapy as an option for pediatric surgical conditions. European
journal of pediatric surgery : official journal of Austrian Association of Pediatric Surgery [et al] =
Zeitschrift fur Kinderchirurgie 2014;24(3):219-26.
[70] McCulloh CJ, Olson JK, Zhou Y, Wang Y, Besner GE. Stem cells and necrotizing enterocolitis: A
direct comparison of the efficacy of multiple types of stem cells. Journal of pediatric surgery
2017.
[71] Jensen AR, Manning MM, Khaneki S, Drucker NA, Markel TA. Harvest tissue source does not
alter the protective power of stromal cell therapy after intestinal ischemia and reperfusion
injury. The Journal of surgical research 2016;204(2):361-70.
[72] Jensen AR, Doster DL, Hunsberger EB, Manning MM, Stokes SM, Barwinska D, et al. Human
Adipose Stromal Cells Increase Survival and Mesenteric Perfusion Following Intestinal Ischemia
and Reperfusion Injury. Shock 2016;46(1):75-82.
[73] Hawkey CJ. Stem cells as treatment in inflammatory bowel disease. Dig Dis 2012;30 Suppl 3:134-
9.
[74] Ryska O, Serclova Z, Mestak O, Matouskova E, Vesely P, Mrazova I. Local application of adipose-
derived mesenchymal stem cells supports the healing of fistula: prospective randomised study
on rat model of fistulising Crohn's disease. Scand J Gastroenterol 2017;52(5):543-50.
[75] Furlani D, Ugurlucan M, Ong L, Bieback K, Pittermann E, Westien I, et al. Is the intravascular
administration of mesenchymal stem cells safe? Mesenchymal stem cells and intravital
microscopy. Microvasc Res 2009;77(3):370-6.
[76] Schrepfer S, Deuse T, Reichenspurner H, Fischbein MP, Robbins RC, Pelletier MP. Stem cell
transplantation: the lung barrier. Transplant Proc 2007;39(2):573-6.
[77] Eaton S, Zani A, Pierro A, De Coppi P. Stem cells as a potential therapy for necrotizing
enterocolitis. Expert Opin Biol Ther 2013;13(12):1683-9.
[78] Samuels N, van de Graaf RA, de Jonge RCJ, Reiss IKM, Vermeulen MJ. Risk factors for necrotizing
enterocolitis in neonates: a systematic review of prognostic studies. BMC pediatrics
2017;17(1):105.
[79] Grant CN, Grikscheit TC. Tissue engineering: a promising therapeutic approach to necrotizing
enterocolitis. Semin Pediatr Surg 2013;22(2):112-6.
[80] Totonelli G, Maghsoudlou P, Garriboli M, Riegler J, Orlando G, Burns AJ, et al. A rat
decellularized small bowel scaffold that preserves villus-crypt architecture for intestinal
regeneration. Biomaterials 2012;33(12):3401-10.
[81] Yui S, Nakamura T, Sato T, Nemoto Y, Mizutani T, Zheng X, et al. Functional engraftment of colon
epithelium expanded in vitro from a single adult Lgr5(+) stem cell. Nat Med 2012;18(4):618-23.
[82] Sala FG, Kunisaki SM, Ochoa ER, Vacanti J, Grikscheit TC. Tissue-engineered small intestine and
stomach form from autologous tissue in a preclinical large animal model. The Journal of surgical
research 2009;156(2):205-12.
[83] Shaffiey SA, Jia H, Keane T, Costello C, Wasserman D, Quidgley M, et al. Intestinal stem cell
growth and differentiation on a tubular scaffold with evaluation in small and large animals.
Regen Med 2016;11(1):45-61.
[84] Patil PB, Chougule PB, Kumar VK, Almstrom S, Backdahl H, Banerjee D, et al. Recellularization of
acellular human small intestine using bone marrow stem cells. Stem cells translational medicine
2013;2(4):307-15.
[85] Lalu MM, McIntyre L, Pugliese C, Fergusson D, Winston BW, Marshall JC, et al. Safety of cell
therapy with mesenchymal stromal cells (SafeCell): a systematic review and meta-analysis of
clinical trials. PLoS One 2012;7(10):e47559.
[86] Prockop DJ, Brenner M, Fibbe WE, Horwitz E, Le Blanc K, Phinney DG, et al. Defining the risks of
mesenchymal stromal cell therapy. Cytotherapy 2010;12(5):576-8.
[87] Lalu MM, McIntyre L, Pugliese C, Fergusson D, Winston BW, Marshall JC, et al. Safety of Cell
Therapy with Mesenchymal Stromal Cells (SafeCell): A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of
Clinical Trials. PLoS ONE 2012;7(10):e47559.
[88] Merkle FT, Ghosh S, Kamitaki N, Mitchell J, Avior Y, Mello C, et al. Human pluripotent stem cells
recurrently acquire and expand dominant negative P53 mutations. Nature 2017;545(7653):229-
33.
[89] Mousavinejad M, Andrews PW, Shoraki EK. Current Biosafety Considerations in Stem Cell
Therapy. Cell J 2016;18(2):281-7.
[90] Aguilar S, Nye E, Chan J, Loebinger M, Spencer-Dene B, Fisk N, et al. Murine but not human
mesenchymal stem cells generate osteosarcoma-like lesions in the lung. Stem cells
2007;25(6):1586-94.
[91] Tolar J, Nauta AJ, Osborn MJ, Panoskaltsis Mortari A, McElmurry RT, Bell S, et al. Sarcoma
derived from cultured mesenchymal stem cells. Stem cells 2007;25(2):371-9.