Faq Caf 124-1
Faq Caf 124-1
Faq Caf 124-1
knowledge wherever it may lead, without undue or unreasonable interference.[1] At the minimum,
academic freedom involves the freedom to engage in the entire range of activities involved in the
production of knowledge, including choosing a research focus, determining what to teach in the
classroom, presenting research findings to colleagues, and publishing research findings. [2] Still,
academic freedom has limits. In the United States, for example, according to the widely
recognized "1940 Statement on Academic Freedom and Tenure"[3], teachers should be careful to
avoid controversial matter that is unrelated to the subject. When they speak or write in public,
they are free to express their opinions without fear from institutional censorship or discipline,
but they should show restraint and clearly indicate that they are not speaking for their
institution. Academic tenure protects academic freedom by ensuring that teachers can be fired
only for causes such as gross professional incompetence or behavior that evokes condemnation
from the academic community itself.
Proponents of academic freedom believe that the freedom of inquiry by students and faculty
members is essential to the mission of the academy. They argue that academic communities are
repeatedly targeted for repression due to their ability to shape and control the flow of
information. When scholars attempt to teach or communicate ideas or facts that are inconvenient
to external political groups or to authorities, they may find themselves targeted for public
vilification, job loss, imprisonment, or even death. For example, in North Africa, a professor of
public health discovered that his country's infant mortality rate was higher than government
figures indicated. He lost his job and was imprisoned.[4]
The fate of biology in the Soviet Union is also cited as a reason why society has an interest in
protecting academic freedom. A Soviet biologist named Trofim Lysenko rejected Western
scientific advances and proposed a new, unscientific approach to biology (called Lysenkoism)
that was based on the principles of dialectical materialism. Because of their propaganda value,
Lysenko's ideas proved appealing to the Soviet leadership, and he became the director of the
Soviet Academy of Agricultural Sciences; subsequently, Lysenko directed a purge of scientists
who professed "harmful ideas," resulting in the expulsion, imprisonment, or death of hundreds of
Soviet scientists. Lysenko's unscientific ideas were implemented on collectivized farms in the
Soviet Union and China. Famines that resulted partly from Lysenko's influence are believed to
have killed 30 million people in China alone.[5]
Academic freedom for professors:
In the German tradition, professors are free to try to convert their students to their personal
viewpoint and philosophical system.[14] Nevertheless, professors are discouraged or prohibited
from stating their views, particularly political views, outside the class; in regard to his teaching,
there should be no duties required of the professor, no prescribed syllabus, and no restriction to
a particular subject.
In the United States, academic freedom is generally taken as the notion of academic freedom
defined by the "1940 Statement of Principles on Academic Freedom and Tenure," jointly
authored by the American Association of University Professors (AAUP) and the Association of
American Colleges ("AAC")(now the Association of American Colleges and Universities).[15]
These principles state that "Teachers are entitled to freedom in the classroom in discussing their
subject."[15] The statement also permits institutions to impose "limitations of academic freedom
because of religious or other aims," so long as they are "clearly stated in writing at the time of
the appointment."[15] The six regional accreditors work with American colleges and universities,
including private and religious institutions, to implement this standard. Additionally, the AAUP,
which is not an accrediting body, works with these same institutions. The AAUP does not always
agree with the regional accrediting bodies on the standards of protection of academic freedom
and tenure.. [16]The AAUP lists those colleges and universities which it has found to violate these
principles.[17]