3

Name: RONNIE F. TEJANO Office: Curriculuim and Learning Management Division

Designation: EPS-ENGLISH CY: 2019
Date of Preparation January 3, 2019

A. Performance Planning

Review/Findings Comments/Recommendations Agreement/s

KRA Objectives
(to be done by Rater or (to be done by Rater or (to be done by Rater or
(Compendium) (as indicated in IPCRF) committee)
committee) committee)
1.MANAGEMENT 1.a. Designed and utilized Executed oustandingly To check the schedule of M Ratee to confer with the
OF CURRICULUM tools for monitoring meeting compliance with and E to the schedules of calendar of activities
IMPLEMENTATION curriculum implementation quality, timeliness and SDOs to avoid overlapping
and articulation of the k to efficiency. His performance to
12 BEP this objective was carried out
based on the specified
compendium duly suported
by MOVs thus rated O.

1.b. Conducted monitoring Completed and exceeded the A more deep analysis of Ratee agreed to specify
and evaluation and number of target M and E, findings on the result of M and details of concerns and
submitted recommendations submitting compliance with E must be reflected in the recommendations for
towards enhancing the the needed requirements and summary of findings. further study and conduct
management and delivery of findings for policy of technical assistance.
the K to 12 BEP following recommendations and
Key Stage Standards, technical assistance.
ContentStandards,
Performance Standards
and Learning
Competencies.
 1.c. Conducted evaluation of Summary of findings were SDOs to retain copies of Ratee to check the other
SDOs Instructional communicated as an MOV, Supervisory plans to the office documents needed to
Supervision Plan the ratee had submitted copy together with the reports of the support findings.
Implementation and submit of his report for policy school heads.
policy recommendations recommendations dully
toward process approved and recorded.
improvement

2.CURRICULUM 2.a.Led/ worked as a team Actual results and activities A summary of trained and Ratee to submit a three-
DEVELOPMENT, member in the development were asked and the ratee untrained must be specified to year inventory of
ENRICHMENT, and of a training/ writeshop skilfully demonstrated and identify the extent of participants relative to the
LOCALIZATION design to localize/ shared experiences towards the participation by SDOs for training conducted.
writeshops and trainings
indiginize/ contextualize future planning.
conducted. MOVs as to
learning competencies attendance and
accomplishment reports were
availbale.

3.LEARNING 3.a.Conducted evaluation Documents showed that the Consolidation of best practices Ratee to prapare a platform
DELIVERY and published best ratee together with the CLMD from the gathered M and E to where best paractices
practices on learning team had conducted PIR with Data be done on time with can be best published for
delivery and instructional SDOs and gathered and effiency and quality wider circulation
innovations by Schools published best practices to
Divisions for learning and meet requirements for very
adoption satisfactory remark.

4.LEARNING 4.a.Led or worked as a team The ratee had proven the Timeliness must adhere to Ratee to check timeliness
RESOURCE member to develop local conduct and has led the what was being targeted to in the development and
learning materials to development of local learning avoid deduction of points. pilot testing on or before
increase variety of learning materials in English 6 ( First the target date.
resource to support the to Fourth Quarter) following
BEP. standard such as quality
assurance and pilot testing
5.LEARNING 5.a.Gathered result of Result of the National English and ELLN must be Ratee to conduct
OUTCOMES assessment reports and Achievement Test and taken into consideration for intervention activities to
ASSESSMENT analyze performance gaps ELLNA were anayzed and planning and intervention to adress least mastered
for possible interventions. communicated to all schools meet the need mastery level. competencies in Grades 4,
division offices. 10 and 12 and the Key
Recommendations were also Stage 1.
communicated for
intervention.

6.SPECIAL 6.a.Conducted special SPJ and SPFL are in The need to increase Ratee to diseminate
CURRICULAR curricular programs and operation as indicative of participation of large schools to memorandum for the
PROGRAMS AND support activities and increased in enrolment and implement the programs. expansion of these special
SUPPORT submitted accomplishment cohort survival rate. Result of programs to the field.
ACTIVITIES reports for appropriate achievements were
management action commendable as perceived
in the result of NSPC and
RFOT.

7.TECHNICAL 7.a.Prepared and submitted Report on Technical Strictly observe quality, effiency Ratee to follow specified
ASSISTANCE reports on the progress of Assistance were evident, and timeliness in the provision date of conducting TAs.
TA being provided to progress of the TAs were of technical assistance to
Schools Divisions communicated. Schools Division Offices

RONNIE F. TEJANO OCTAVIO V. CABASAG, PhD. ARNULFO M. BALANE, CESO V

Ratee Rater Director III/ Assistant Regional Director
A. 1. Performance Monitoring

Variance
KRA No. Objective Targets Accomplishment
Gap (-) or Gain (+)
B. Rewards and Recognition

KRA No.(Indicated Objectives

% Weight per Objective Quality Efficiency
weight per KRA) (as indicated in IPCRF)
, CESO V
onal Director
Remarks
 Rating
TOTAL [(Q+E+T)/3]
(%)

Timeliness
 Feedback and Tracking Form

Name: RONNIE F. TEJANO Office: Curriculuim and Learning Management Division

Designation: EPS- ENGLISH CY: 2019
Date of Preparation April 5, 2019

A. Performance Planning

Review/Findings Comments/Reco Agreement/s

mmendations
KRA Objectives (to be done by (to be done by
(to be done by
(Compendium) (as indicated in IPCRF) Rater or Rater or Rater or
committee) committee) committee)
1.MANAGEMENT 1.a. Designed and utilized Executed To check the Ratee to confer
OF CURRICULUM tools for monitoring oustandingly schedule of M with the
IMPLEMENTATION curriculum implementation meeting compliance and E to the calendar of
and articulation of the k to with quality, schedules of activities
12 BEP timeliness and SDOs to avoid
efficiency. His overlapping
performance to this
objectives was
carried out based on
the specified
compendium
1.b. Conducted monitoring Completed with
and A more deep Ratee agreed
and evaluation and exceeded the analysis of to specify
submitted recommendations number of target M findings on the details of
towards enhancing the and E, submitting result of M and E concerns and
management and delivery of compliance with the must be recommendatio
the K to 12 BEP following needed reflected in the ns for further
Key Stage Standards, requirements and summary of study and
ContentStandards, findings for policy findings. conduct of
Performance Standards recommendations technical
and Learning and technical assistance.
Competencies. assistance.
 1.c. Conducted evaluation of Summary of findings SDOs to retain Ratee to check
SDOs Instructional were communicated copies of the other
Supervision Plan as an MOV, the Supervisory documents
Implementation and submit ratee had submitted plans to the needed to
policy recommendations copy of his report for office together support
toward process policy with the reports findings.
improvement recommendations of the school
dully approved and heads.
2.CURRICULUM 2.a.Led/ worked as a team Actual results and A summary of Ratee to submit
DEVELOPMENT, member in the development activities were asked trained and a three-year
ENRICHMENT, and of a training/ writeshop and the ratee skilfully untrained must inventory of
LOCALIZATION design to localize/ demonstrated and be specified to participants
shared experiences
indiginize/ contextualize identify the relative to the
towards the
learning competencies writeshops and extent of training
trainings conducted. participation by conducted.
MOVs as to SDOs for future
attendance and planning.
accomplishment
3.LEARNING 3.a.Conducted evaluation Documents showed Consolidation of Ratee to
DELIVERY and published best that the ratee best practices prapare a
practices on learning together with the from the platform to
delivery and instructional CLMD team had gathered M and where best
innovations by Schools conducted PIR with E Data be done paractices can
Divisions for learning and SDOs and gathered on time with be best
adoption and published best effiency and published for
practices to meet quality wider
requirements for circulation
4.LEARNING 4.a.Led or worked as a team The ratee had Timeliness must Ratee to check
RESOURCE member to develop local proven the conduct adhere to what timeliness in
learning materials to and has led the was being the
increase variety of learning development of targeted to avoid development
resource to support the local learning deduction of and pilot testing
BEP. materials in English points. on or before the
6 ( First to Fourth target date.
Quarter) following
standard such as
5.LEARNING 5.a.Gathered result of Result of the English and Ratee to
OUTCOMES assessment reports and National ELLN must be conduct
ASSESSMENT analyze performance gaps Achievement Test taken into intervention
for possible interventions. and ELLNA were consideration for activities to
anayzed and planning and adress least
communicated to all intervention to mastered
schools division meet the need competencies
offices. mastery level. in Grades 4, 10
Recommendations and 12 and the
6.SPECIAL 6.a.Conducted special SPJ and SPFL are The need to Ratee to
CURRICULAR curricular programs and in operation as increase diseminate
PROGRAMS AND support activities and indicative of participation of memorandum
SUPPORT submitted accomplishment increased in large schools to for the
ACTIVITIES reports for appropriate enrolment and implement the expansion of
management action cohort survival rate. programs. these special
Result of programs to the
achievements were field.
commendable as
7.TECHNICAL 7.a.Prepared and submitted Report on Technical Strictly observe Ratee to follow
ASSISTANCE reports on the progress of Assistance were quality, effiency specified date
TA being provided to evident, progress of and timeliness in of conducting
Schools Divisions the TAs were the provision of TAs.
communicated. technical
assistance to

A. 1. Performance Monitoring (Quarter 1)

Variance
KRA No. Objective Targets Accomplishment Gap (-) or Gain Remarks
(+)
1.MANAGEMENT 1.a. Designed and utilized
OF CURRICULUM tools for monitoring
IMPLEMENTATION curriculum implementation 0 0 0
and articulation of the k to
12 BEP

1.b. Conducted monitoring

and evaluation and
submitted recommendations
towards enhancing the
management and delivery of
the K to 12 BEP following
Key Stage Standards,
ContentStandards, 1 1 0
Performance Standards
and Learning
Competencies.
Monitored
SDO City of
Ilagan
 1.c. Conducted evaluation of
SDOs Instructional
Supervision Plan
Implementation and submit 1 1 0
policy recommendations
toward process
improvement

2.CURRICULUM 2.a.Led/ worked as a team

DEVELOPMENT, member in the development
ENRICHMENT, and of a training/ writeshop Conducted
LOCALIZATION design to localize/ 1 1 0 Contextualized
indiginize/ contextualize Assessment
learning competencies Tool for Stage
1 English
3.LEARNING 3.a.Conducted evaluation
DELIVERY and published best
practices on learning
delivery and instructional 0 0 0
innovations by Schools
Divisions for learning and
adoption

4.LEARNING 4.a.Led or worked as a team

RESOURCE member to develop local
learning materials to
increase variety of learning 0 0 0
resource to support the
BEP.
5.LEARNING 5.a.Gathered result of Analyzed
OUTCOMES assessment reports and result of
ASSESSMENT analyze performance gaps 1 1 0
English NAT,
for possible interventions. ELLNA
6.SPECIAL 6.a.Conducted special
CURRICULAR curricular programs and
PROGRAMS AND support activities and
SUPPORT submitted accomplishment 6 3 3
ACTIVITIES reports for appropriate Expanded the
management action programs to
SDOs
7.TECHNICAL 7.a.Prepared and submitted
ASSISTANCE reports on the progress of Conducted Tas
TA being provided to 2 2 0 in Nueva
Schools Divisions Vizcaya and
Quirino

B. Rewards and Recognition

Rating
KRA No.(Indicated Objectives % Weight per
Quality Efficiency Timeliness TOTAL [(Q+E+T)/3]
weight per KRA) (as indicated in IPCRF) Objective
(%)
1.MANAGEMENT 1.a. Designed and utilized 10%
OF CURRICULUM tools for monitoring
IMPLEMENTATION curriculum implementation
0 0 0 0 0
(30%) and articulation of the k to
12 BEP

1.b. Conducted monitoring 10%

and evaluation and
submitted recommendations
towards enhancing the
management and delivery of
the K to 12 BEP following
Key Stage Standards,
ContentStandards, 0 0 0 0 0
Performance Standards
and Learning
Competencies.
 1.c. Conducted evaluation of 10%
SDOs Instructional
Supervision Plan
Implementation and submit
policy recommendations 0 0 0 0 0
toward process
improvement

2.CURRICULUM 2.a.Led/ worked as a team 15%

DEVELOPMENT, member in the development
ENRICHMENT, and of a training/ writeshop
LOCALIZATION design to localize/
(15%) indiginize/ contextualize 5 5 5 15 0.5
learning competencies

3.LEARNING 3.a.Conducted evaluation 10%

DELIVERY (10%) and published best
practices on learning
delivery and instructional
innovations by Schools 0 0 0 0 0
Divisions for learning and
adoption

4.LEARNING 4.a.Led or worked as a team 10%

RESOURCE (10%) member to develop local
learning materials to
increase variety of learning 0 0 0 0 0
resource to support the
BEP.

5.LEARNING 5.a.Gathered result of 10%

OUTCOMES assessment reports and
ASSESSMENT analyze performance gaps 0 0 0 0 0
(10%) for possible interventions.

6.SPECIAL 6.a.Conducted special 10%

CURRICULAR curricular programs and
PROGRAMS AND support activities and
SUPPORT submitted accomplishment 0 0 0 0 0
ACTIVITIES (10%) reports for appropriate
management action
7.TECHNICAL 7.a.Prepared and submitted 10%
ASSISTANCE (10%) reports on the progress of
TA being provided to 0 0 0 0 0
Schools Divisions

5%
PLUS FACTOR (5%)
TOTAL

RONNIE F. TEJANO OCTAVIO V. CABASAG, PhD. ARNULFO M. BALANE, CESO V

Ratee Rater Director III/ Assistant Regional Director
14 3 3 0
 Feedback and Tracking Form

Name: RONNIE F. TEJANO Office: Curriculuim and Learning Management Division

Designation: EPS- ENGLISH CY: 2019
Date of Preparation July 5, 2019

A. Performance Planning

Review/Findings Comments/Recomm Agreement/s

KRA Objectives (to be done by endations (to be done by
(Compendium) (as indicated in IPCRF) Rater or (to be done by Rater Rater or
or committee)
committee) committee)
1.MANAGEMENT 1.a. Designed and utilized Executed To check the Ratee to confer
OF CURRICULUM tools for monitoring oustandingly schedule of M with the calendar
IMPLEMENTATION curriculum implementation meeting compliance and E to the of activities
and articulation of the k to with quality, schedules of
12 BEP timeliness and SDOs to avoid
efficiency. His overlapping
performance to this
objectives was
carried out based on
the specified
compendium
1.b. Conducted monitoring Completed with
and A more deep Ratee agreed to
and evaluation and exceeded the analysis of specify details of
submitted recommendations number of target M findings on the concerns and
towards enhancing the and E, submitting result of M and recommendations
management and delivery of compliance with the E must be for further study
the K to 12 BEP following needed reflected in the and conduct of
Key Stage Standards, requirements and summary of technical
ContentStandards, findings for policy findings. assistance.
Performance Standards recommendations
and Learning and technical
Competencies. assistance.
 1.c. Conducted evaluation of Summary of findings SDOs to retain Ratee to check the
SDOs Instructional were communicated copies of other documents
Supervision Plan as an MOV, the ratee Supervisory needed to support
Implementation and submit had submitted copy plans to the findings.
policy recommendations of his report for office together
toward process policy with the reports
improvement recommendations of the school
dully approved and heads.
2.CURRICULUM 2.a.Led/ worked as a team Actual results and A summary of Ratee to submit a
DEVELOPMENT, member in the development activities were asked trained and three-year
ENRICHMENT, and of a training/ writeshop and the ratee skilfully untrained must inventory of
LOCALIZATION design to localize/ demonstrated and be specified to participants
shared experiences
indiginize/ contextualize identify the relative to the
towards the writeshops
learning competencies and trainings extent of training conducted.
conducted. MOVs as participation by
to attendance and SDOs for future
accomplishment planning.
reports were availbale.
3.LEARNING 3.a.Conducted evaluation Documents showed Consolidation of Ratee to prapare a
DELIVERY and published best that the ratee best practices platform to where
practices on learning together with the from the best paractices
delivery and instructional CLMD team had gathered M and can be best
innovations by Schools conducted PIR with E Data be done published for wider
Divisions for learning and SDOs and gathered on time with circulation
adoption and published best effiency and
practices to meet quality
requirements for
4.LEARNING 4.a.Led or worked as a team The ratee had Timeliness must Ratee to check
RESOURCE member to develop local proven the conduct adhere to what timeliness in the
learning materials to and has led the was being development and
increase variety of learning development of local targeted to pilot testing on or
resource to support the learning materials in avoid deduction before the target
BEP. English 6 ( First to of points. date.
Fourth Quarter)
following standard
such as quality
5.LEARNING 5.a.Gathered result of Result of the English and Ratee to conduct
OUTCOMES assessment reports and National ELLN must be intervention
ASSESSMENT analyze performance gaps Achievement Test taken into activities to adress
for possible interventions. and ELLNA were consideration for least mastered
anayzed and planning and competencies in
communicated to all intervention to Grades 4, 10 and
schools division meet the need 12 and the Key
offices. mastery level. Stage 1.
Recommendations
6.SPECIAL 6.a.Conducted special SPJ and SPFL are in The need to Ratee to
CURRICULAR curricular programs and operation as increase diseminate
PROGRAMS AND support activities and indicative of participation of memorandum for
SUPPORT submitted accomplishment increased in large schools to the expansion of
ACTIVITIES reports for appropriate enrolment and implement the these special
management action cohort survival rate. programs. programs to the
Result of field.
achievements were
commendable as
7.TECHNICAL 7.a.Prepared and submitted Report on Technical Strictly observe Ratee to follow
ASSISTANCE reports on the progress of Assistance were quality, effiency specified date of
TA being provided to evident, progress of and timeliness in conducting TAs.
Schools Divisions the TAs were the provision of
communicated. technical
assistance to

A. 1. Performance Monitoring (Quarter 2)

Variance
KRA No. Objective Targets Accomplishment Gap (-) or Gain Remarks
(+)
1.MANAGEMENT 1.a. Designed and utilized
OF CURRICULUM tools for monitoring
IMPLEMENTATION curriculum implementation Designed M
1 1 0
and articulation of the k to and E in
12 BEP Special
Programs ( F7)
1.b. Conducted monitoring
and evaluation and
submitted recommendations
towards enhancing the
management and delivery of
the K to 12 BEP following
Key Stage Standards,
ContentStandards, 2 2 0
Performance Standards
and Learning
Competencies. Monitored
SDO Nueva
Vizcaya and
SDO Quirino
 1.c. Conducted evaluation of
SDOs Instructional
Supervision Plan
Implementation and submit 2 2 0
policy recommendations Target met for
toward process the 2nd
improvement quarter
2.CURRICULUM 2.a.Led/ worked as a team
DEVELOPMENT, member in the development
ENRICHMENT, and of a training/ writeshop
LOCALIZATION design to localize/
0 0 0
indiginize/ contextualize
learning competencies
Target met for
the 1st quarter
3.LEARNING 3.a.Conducted evaluation
DELIVERY and published best
practices on learning
delivery and instructional
0 1 -1
innovations by Schools
Divisions for learning and To happen at
adoption the end of the
quarter
4.LEARNING 4.a.Led or worked as a team
RESOURCE member to develop local
learning materials to
increase variety of learning 0 0 0
resource to support the
BEP. met target at
the 1st quarter
5.LEARNING 5.a.Gathered result of
OUTCOMES assessment reports and
ASSESSMENT analyze performance gaps 1 1 0 Gathered
for possible interventions. PHIL-IRI
Results
6.SPECIAL 6.a.Conducted special
CURRICULAR curricular programs and Exceeded
PROGRAMS AND support activities and targets in the
SUPPORT submitted accomplishment 20 10 10 number of
ACTIVITIES reports for appropriate schools
management action applied for
SPJ
7.TECHNICAL 7.a.Prepared and submitted
ASSISTANCE reports on the progress of
TA being provided to 0 0 0
Schools Divisions
met target at
the 1st quarter

RONNIE F. TEJANO OCTAVIO V. CABASAG, PhD. ARNULFO M. BALANE, CESO V

Ratee Rater Director III/ Assistant Regional Director
B. Rewards and Recognition

Rating
KRA No.(Indicated Objectives % Weight per
Quality Efficiency Timeliness TOTAL [(Q+E+T)/3]
weight per KRA) (as indicated in IPCRF) Objective
(%)
1.MANAGEMENT 1.a. Designed and utilized
OF CURRICULUM tools for monitoring
IMPLEMENTATION curriculum implementation
10% 5 5 5 15 0.50
(30%) and articulation of the k to
12 BEP

1.b. Conducted monitoring

and evaluation and
submitted recommendations
towards enhancing the
management and delivery of
the K to 12 BEP following
Key Stage Standards,
ContentStandards, 10% 5 5 5 15 0.50
Performance Standards
and Learning
Competencies.
 1.c. Conducted evaluation of
SDOs Instructional
Supervision Plan
Implementation and submit
policy recommendations 10% 5 5 5 15 0.50
toward process
improvement

2.CURRICULUM 2.a.Led/ worked as a team

DEVELOPMENT, member in the development
ENRICHMENT, and of a training/ writeshop
LOCALIZATION design to localize/
(15%) indiginize/ contextualize 15% 0 0 0 0 0.00
learning competencies

3.LEARNING 3.a.Conducted evaluation

DELIVERY (10%) and published best
practices on learning
delivery and instructional
innovations by Schools 10% 0 0 0 0 0.00
Divisions for learning and
adoption

4.LEARNING 4.a.Led or worked as a team

RESOURCE (10%) member to develop local
learning materials to
increase variety of learning 10% 5 5 5 15 0.50
resource to support the
BEP.

5.LEARNING 5.a.Gathered result of

OUTCOMES assessment reports and
ASSESSMENT analyze performance gaps 10% 5 5 5 15 0.50
(10%) for possible interventions.

6.SPECIAL 6.a.Conducted special

CURRICULAR curricular programs and
PROGRAMS AND support activities and
SUPPORT submitted accomplishment 10% 5 5 5 15 0.50
ACTIVITIES (10%) reports for appropriate
management action
7.TECHNICAL 7.a.Prepared and submitted
ASSISTANCE (10%) reports on the progress of
TA being provided to
10% 0 0 0 0 0.00
Schools Divisions

PLUS FACTOR (5%)

5% 0.00

TOTAL 0.00

RONNIE F.TEJANO OCTAVIO V. CABASAG, PhD. ARNULFO M. BALANE, CESO V

Ratee Rater Director III/ Assistant Regional Director
14 3 3 0
 Individual Performance Commitment and Re
Name of Employee: RONNIE F. TEJANO
Position: EDUCATION PROGRAM SUPERVISOR
Review Period: January-December, 2019
Bureau/Center/Service/Division: CLMD
TO BE FILLED IN DURING PLANNING

Weight
MFOs KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINE
per KRA

MANAGEMENT OF
CURRICULUM 30%
IMPLEMENTATION
Development of M & E 1. Designed and utilized tools for
Tools for K to 12 BEP monitoring curriculum implementation
May-September
Implementation and articulation of the k to 12 BEP 10%
2019

M & E of the K to 12 2. Conducted monitoring and

BEP Implementation evaluation and submit
recommendation towards enhancing
the management and delivery of the K
to 12 BEP following Key Stage
Standards, ContentStandards, June -
10%
Performance Standards December 2019
and Learning Competencies.
Evaluation of the SDO 3. Conducted evaluation of SDOs
Instructional Instructional Supervision Plan
Supervision Plan Implementation and submit policy June-December
10%
Implementation recommendations toward process 2019
improvement

CURRICULUM
DEVELOPMENT,
15%
ENRICHMENT, and
LOCALIZATION
Local Materials Led/ worked as a team member in the
Development development of a training/ writeshop
design to localize/ indiginize/ April -
contextualize learning competencies December 2019 15%
 LEARNING
10%
DELIVERY
Gathering and Conducted evaluation and published
Publishing of Best best practices on learning delivery
Practices on and instructional innovations by June-
10%
Instructional Schools Divisions for learning and December 2019
Innovations adoption

LEARNING
10%
RESOURCE
Development of Local Led or worked as a team member to
Learning Materials develop local learning materials to
increase variety of learning resource April-December
10%
to support the BEP. 2019
 LEARNING
OUTCOMES 10%
ASSESSMENT
Recommendation of Gathered result of assessment reports
interventions and analyze performance gaps for
possible interventions. July-December
10%
2019

SPECIAL
CURRICULAR
PROGRAMS AND 10%
SUPPORT
ACTIVITIES
Conduct of special Conducted special curricular
curricular programs programs and support activities and
and support activities submitted accomplishment reports for June-
10%
appropriate management action December 2019

TECHNICAL
10%
ASSISTANCE
 Prepared and submitted reports on
the progress of TA being provided to
Schools Divisions June-December
10%
2019

PLUS FACTOR 5%

* To get the score, the rating is multiplied by the weight assigned

ISAGANI R. DURUIN, PhD. OCTAVIO V. CABASAG, PhD. ARNULFO M. BALANE, CESO

Ratee Rater Assistant Regional Director
Approving Authority
erformance Commitment and Review Form
Name of Rater: OCTAVIO V. CABASAG, PhD.
Position: Chief, CLMD
Date of Review: December, 2019

G TO BE FILLED DURING EVALUATION

PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ACTUAL RESULTS RATING SCORE*

(Quality, Efficiency, Timeliness)
Q E T Ave

5- Designed and implemented M & E Tools for

the implementation and articulation of the K to
12 BEP by the end of May 2019 0.00 0.00 0.00

4- Designed and utilized M & E Tools for the

implementation and articulation of the k to 12
BEP by the end of June 2019

3- Designed and utilized M & E Tools for the

implementation and articulation of the BEP by
the end of July 2019

2 -Designed and utilized M & E Tools for the

implementation and articulation of the BEP by
the end of August 2019

1- Designed M & E Tools for the

implementation and articulation of the BEP by
the end of September 2019
5- Conducted 1 M & E and submitted
recommendation towards the enhancement of
the Curriculum by cycle and completed 3 M &
E by the end of December 2019

0 0 0

4- Conducted 2 M & E and submitted

recommendation towards the enhancement of
the Curriculum by the end of December 2019
3- Conducted 1 M & E and submitted
recommendation towards the enhancement of
the Curriculum by the end of December 2019

2- Conducted 1 M & E but did not submit

recommendation towards the enhancement of
the Curriculum by the end of December 2019
1 - Failed to conduct M & E
5 - Conducted evaluation of SDOs
Instructional Supervision Plan Implementation
and submitted policy recommendations toward 0 0 0
process improvement by the end of August
2019
4 - Conducted evaluation of SDOs
Instructional Supervision Plan Implementation
and submitted policy recommendations toward
process improvement by the end of
September 2019

3- Conducted evaluation of SDOs

Instructional Supervision Plan Implementation
but did not submit policy recommendations
toward process improvement by the end of
October 2019
2- Conducted evaluation of SDO Instructional
Supervision Plan Implementation but failed to
submit policy recommendations toward
process improvement by the end of
December 2019
1- Failed to conduct evaluation of the SDO's
Instructional Supervision Plan

5 - Led in the development of a training/

writeshop design to localize, indigenize and
contextualize learning competencies by the
end of April 2019 0 0 0.00

4 - Led in the development of a training/

writeshop design to localize, indigenize and
contextualize learning competencies by the
end of June 2019

3- Led in the development of a training/

writeshop design to localize, indigenize, and
contextualize learning competencies by the
end of August 2019
2- Led in the development of a training/
writeshop design to localize, indigenize, and
contextualize learning competencies by the
end of October 2019

1 - No training/ writeshop design

drafted/developed

5 -Gathered and conducted evaluation and

published best practices on learning delivery
and instructional innovations by the end of July 0 0 0
2019

4 -Gathered and conducted evaluation and

published best practices on learning delivery
and instructional innovations by the end of
August 2019

3 -Gathered and conducted evaluation and

published best practices on learning delivery
and instructional innovations by the end of
September 2019

2 -Gathered and conducted evaluation and

published best practices on learning delivery
and instructional innovations by the end of
October 2019

1 - No evaluation conducted and best

practices published on learning delivery and
instructional innovations of Schools Divisions

5 - Led in the Development of Local Learning

Materials in the assigned subject area by the
end of April 2019 0.00 0.00 0.00

4 - Led in the Development of Local Learning

Materials in the assigned subject area by the
end of June 2019

3 - Led in the Development of Local Learning

Materials in the assigned subject area by the
end of August 2019

2 - Led in the Development of Local Learning

Materials in the assigned subject area by the
end of October 2019
1 - Led in the Development of Local Learning
Materials in the assigned subject area by the
end of December 2019

5 - Analyzed assessment reports and

determined causes of the performance gaps
and recommended interventions in SDOs by 0.00 0 0.00
the end of July 2019

4 - Analyzed assessment reports and

determined causes of the performance gaps
in SDOs by the end of August 2019

3 - Analyzed assessment reports and

determined causes of the performance gaps
in SDOs by the end of October 2019

2 - Analyzed assessment reports and failed to

submit accomplishment report by the end of
December 2019
1 - Failed to analyze assessment reports

5 -Conducted 2 special curricular programs

and support activities with complete
accomplishment report by the end of 0.00 0.00 0.00
December 2019

4 -Conducted 2 special curricular programs

and support activities with one (1)
accomplishment report by the end of
December 2019
3 -Conducted 1 special curricular program/
support activity with accomplishment report
by the end of December 2019

2 -Conducted 1 special curricular program/

support activity without accomplishment
report by the end of December 2019

1- No special curricular program/ support

activity conducted
 5 -Prepared and submitted 1 report on the TA
provided to Schools Divisions by cycle and
completed 3 TA by the end of December 2019 0.00 0 0.00

4 -Prepared and submitted two (2) TA reports

by the end of December 2019

3 -Prepared and submitted one (1) report on

the TA provided to Schools Divisions by the
end of the year

2 -Provided one (1) TA but did not submit a

report
1 -Failed to conduct TA
0

Overall Rating
0.00
for Accomplish-
ments
DEPED RPMS Form

ARNULFO M. BALANE, CESO V

Assistant Regional Director
Approving Authority