Purposive Communication
Purposive Communication
Purposive Communication
PURPOSIVE COMMUNICATION
Communicative competence “refers to the tacit knowledge and the ability to use
language effectively” (Nordquist, 2018). The article by Canale and Swain, "Theoretical Bases of
Communicative Approaches to Second Language Teaching and Testing" (Applied Linguistics,
1980) identified four components needed to communicate:
“Learning a language is not just about learning to comprehend the grammatical rules and
its meaning, but also the ability to use and to apply it in real-life situations. Communicative
competence, although may be defined differently by different perspectives, has a bearing on the
way a person reacts and responds to the communication of others which is reflected in the style
of communication” (Richmond and McCroskey, 1985).
Intercultural Communication
1. Demonstrate your willingness to meet others at least halfway by learning a few phrases
in their language.
2. Talk to people who know the culture about common traps and problems.
3. Adapt your behavior, and don’t always expect others to adapt to you.
4. Check your understanding and that of others.
5. Don’t be afraid to apologize.
6. Use local television to learn about behavioral issues and norms.
7. Reflect on your experience.
It is the ability to analyze something based on facts to form judgement. In 1965, Bloom
categorize levels of reasoning skills into six parts now called as “Bloom’s Taxonomy”:
To better understand the three components, here’s a model for the Paul-Elder Framework:
A good critical thinker knows how to separate facts from opinions, how to examine an
issue from all sides, how to make rational inferences and how to withhold personal judgment or
biases. In order to be a critical thinker, one must be able to:
1. Raise vital questions and problems, formulating them clearly and precisely
2. Gather and assess relevant information, using abstract ideas to interpret it effectively
3. Come to well-reasoned conclusions and solutions, testing them against relevant criteria
and standards;
4. Think open-mindedly within alternative systems of thought, recognizing and assessing,
as need be, their assumptions, implications, and practical consequences; and
5. Communicate effectively with others in figuring out solutions to complex problems.
References:
Nur'ain Balqis, Haladin & Ibrahim, Noor & Rajab, Azizah. (2013). Assertiveness Among
Undergraduates in a Malaysian Public University: Implications Towards Improved
Employability. Jurnal Teknologi. 65. 10.11113/jt.v65.2346.
To Analyze Thinking We Must Identify and Question its Elemental Structures. (n.d.). Retrieved
from https://www.criticalthinking.org/ctmodel/logic-model1.htm