Paul A. Haslam Jessica Schafer and Pierr PDF
Paul A. Haslam Jessica Schafer and Pierr PDF
Paul A. Haslam Jessica Schafer and Pierr PDF
Each chapter includes, at the beginning, Learning Objectives, and, at the end, Summary,
Questions for Critical Thought, Suggested Reading, Related Websites, and Bibliography.
CHAPTER 5 Gender and Development: The Struggles of Women in the Global South 86
Andrea Martinez 86
An Obstacle Course 86
The Emergence of the Field ‘Women, Gender, and Development’ 90
Three Lessons 102
Introduction 107
Globalization and Developing Countries 108
Another Globalization? 116
Looking Ahead 120
CHAPTER 7 State of the State: Does the State Have a Role in Development? 127
Anil Hira 127
Overview 159
The Origins of the imf and World Bank 160
The People Strike Back: Contentious Issues in the Community–mnc Relationship 211
Multinationals and Development 212
CHAPTER 13 Poverty and Exclusion: From Basic Needs to the Millennium Development
Goals 237
David R. Morrison 237
Introduction 277
Free Trade and Fair Trade since 1945 280
The Limits of a Trade Perspective 286
The Future of International Trade 287
Introduction 331
Putting the ‘Rural’ in Context 333
Rural Transformations 337
Models 340
Challenges 346
CHAPTER 19 Urban Development: Cities and Slums in the Global South 353
Anne Latendresse and Lisa Bornstein 353
Introduction 491
What Is Culture? 493
The Cultural versus the Material 494
Culture as Domination and Culture as Resistance 497
The Cultural Turn 501
Introduction 511
Contrasting Legacies of the Chinese Revolution 512
The Challenges of Contemporary China 514
Concluding Thoughts: China in the Debate on Development 521
Glossary 536
Index xxx
Boxes
Important Concepts
1.1 President Truman’s Point 4
1.3 How to Judge Right and Wrong: Three Philosophical Approaches to Morality
1.4 The Drowning Child Analogy
1.5 Ethics of Participatory Rural Assessment
2.1 An ‘Oriental Despot’: British Company Rule in South Asia
4.1 Stuart Hall on Representation
6.1 The Washington Consensus
7.1 The Nature of Authority in the State
7.2 The Debate between Keynesians and Free Marketeers
8.1 The Many Uses of Foreign Aid
8.3 The 0.7 Per Cent Aid Target
8.6 What Makes a Good Development Agency?
8.7 Results-Based Management
9.1 The US Aims for Bretton Woods
9.2 IMF: Initial Function
9.3 World Bank: Initial Function
9.4 IMF Quotas and World Bank Subscriptions
9.5 Robert McNamara’s Call for a ‘Basic Needs’ Approach
11.1 C.K Prahalad and The Fortune at the Bottom of the Pyramid
11.2 Global Value Chains and the New International Division of Labour
13.1 The UN Millennium Development Goals
13.2 The Human Poverty Index
16.2 India and Substantive Democracy
17.5 Consumption Patterns and Environmental Justice
18.3 Land Tenure and Inequality
19.2 What Is a Slum?
19.4 Urban Agriculture: A Survival Strategy for Poor Urban Dwellers?
19.5 Participatory Budgets and Local Democracy
23.1 Who Is a Migrant?
23.9 Hometown Associations
23.10 Who Is a Refugee?
24.3 The UN Permanent Forum on Indigenous Issues
25.1 Appropriate Housing Technology: Earthbags
25.6 Implementing Universality: Regulatory Measures to Fund It
26.2 Are Hunter-Gatherers Poor?
Critical Issues
1.2 What Is Development?
2.2 The ‘Scramble for Africa’
2.3 Development Project as White Elephant: The Office du Niger
4.2 Beyond the Hegelian View of Africans
4.3 Post-Development Theory in Practice: Alternatives to Development
4.4 Examples of Alternatives to Development Practices
5.1 Examples of Repressive Practices
5.2 The Case of India
5.3 The Threefold Role of Williche Women
5.4 Does Micro-Credit Help Women?
5.5 Building Solidarity through the World March of Women
6.2 A Global Age?
6.3 Are Things Getting Better?
6.4 Is Globalization Reducing or Increasing Poverty and Inequality?
6.6 Governance
6.7 Shanghai Cooperation Organization
6.8 The Rise of South American Integration
6.9 Humanity Needs Change
6.10 Globalization and Climate Change
7.3 ‘The Chilean Miracle’
7.4 Debates over the East Asian Miracle
7.5 Global Chains of Production
8.2 Foreign Aid Cycles
8.4 Tied Aid
8.5 The Canadian International Development Agency
8.8 How Effective Is Foreign Aid?
9.6 The Bank Reflects on Structural Adjustment
9.7 IFIs Embracing Anti-Poverty
10.1 New World Information and Communication Order
10.2 Slums: A United Nations Alert
11.3 Women and Export Processing Zones
11.5 Investor–State Dispute Settlement
11.6 The Changing Face of FDI: The Third World Multinational
14.1 Congo, Kleptocracy, and the Cold War
14.3 Philippines and Nuclear Power
15.1 Neo-Liberalism and ‘Endogenous’ Development: The Jeans Industry in Pelileo, Ecuador
15.2 Regulating Markets: The International Coffee Agreement
Education, Science, Culture, and Media Internal management failures have sometimes
limited UNESCO’s effectiveness. But external
Established in 1946, the United Nations Educational,
challenges have been more serious. In the 1970s,
Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) is
UNESCO’s relations with Western donor governments
a specialized agency headquartered in Paris, where
xiv Contents previously an intergovernmental forum to promote
turned sour because it sponsored an initiative by
non-Western governments to eliminate biases against
intellectual and cultural life had existed. UNESCO’s
them in the world’s media (see Box 10.1). Meanwhile,
mandate is to promote national systems of education,
the World Bank, which exercises major influence
natural and social science education, and the exchange
over education policy in low-income countries, has
Building on the success of the first edition, CRITICAL ISSUES BOX 10.1 NEW WORLD INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION ORDER
Introduction to International Development continues
In the late 1970s, officials, journalists, and activists, meant democratization of information production
to offer comprehensive coverage of theories and top- mainly from non-Western countries, launched a and consumption by enlarging, diversifying, and
debate about the dominance of Western media in the strengthening media, particularly in non-Western
ics in international development studies in a man- world and the lack of adequate access to unbiased countries. To achieve such democratization, inequalities
information among people around the world. They of access to communication infrastructure and
ner that is sophisticated and yet proven to reach and challenged the way that Western media stereotyped
non-Western societies by simplifying, exaggerating,
technology would have to be redressed.
The US, the UK, and a few other governments,
engage students from various backgrounds at the and generally biasing coverage while crowding
out alternative, non-Western sources of news and
strongly backed by mainstream media and right-wing
think-tanks in the West, argued that the NWICO was
first- and second-year level. analysis. Concentrated in the hands of a small number
of Western corporations, ownership and control over
a stratagem to curb press freedoms and free markets.
The US withdrew from UNESCO in 1984, rejoining only
Organized into three sections—theories and news and information gathering, interpretation, and
dissemination also has drawn criticism.
in 2003. Arguably, this opposition merely deflected
the emergence of a new media order, which has
approaches; actors; and issues in international devel- UNESCO was at the centre of this debate. In
1980, its International Commission for the Study of
seen contrasting developments: the rise of powerful
media corporations, often allied to vested political and
opment—this book is unique in its structure. Whereas Communication Problems, chaired by the Nobel Peace
laureate Seán MacBride, published its report, Many
business interests, together with the rise of Internet-
based and other communication technologies, which
most international development textbooks are anchored Voices, One World. The Commission made the case
for what came to be called a New World Information
are extending and amplifying citizens’ voices across
borders. (For an overview of the NWICO controversy,
primarily in one specific discipline, such as political and Communication Order—NWICO. In essence, this see Brown-Syed, 1993.)
5. The political analyst Jens Martens (see Box 10.3) writes that world politics today faces a choice
between elite multilateralism and a multilateralism of solidarity. What forces have created this
choice? Which kind of multilateralism would you bet on in the long run and why?
6. The UN and its agencies have been criticized for serving unilateral political interests under the From the Publisher xv
guise of multilateral politics. How valid are such criticisms?
7. Given the emergence of new powers in the Global South, to what extent will traditional North–
South fractures continue to dominate multilateral processes?
Lima KONGO
OCEAN Java
97
AMERICA
Mozambique
IL
INCA Potosi
AZ
ATLANTIC MADAGASCAR
ZIMBABWE
BR
EMPIRE 1500
1520
Santiago
Buenos Aires
Rio de Janeiro
OCEAN
Cape of Good Hope
152
2
AUSTRALIA
are often highly popular electives in the first and sec-
ond years of Bachelor of Arts programs. This means
19
15
Strait of
Cape Horn
Megellan
that textbooks in international development need to
Portuguese explorers Spanish explorers
serve a population with diverse disciplinary experi-
0 1,500 3,000 Km.
In this respect, the core mission of this book is flexible. Some programs minimize exposure to theory
to build a conceptual common ground for first- in favour of problem-solving and case studies, while
and second-year undergraduate students with no others introduce students to development theory
prior knowledge of development and with diverse early on. To cover these diverse situations found
academic backgrounds. For this reason the book is across undergraduate development programs, the
structured into three sections, on approaches, actors, three distinct sections of this book offer the instruc-
and issues. The chapters in the first section, ‘Theo- tor considerable flexibility. He or she may follow the
ries and Approaches in International Development’, tripartite structure of the book, which progressively
introduce the student to key concepts, historical builds towards a more sophisticated integration of
contexts of development thinking and action, and concepts, actors, and issues, or may pick and choose,
theoretical approaches. A noteworthy feature of this perhaps preferring to twin only actors and issues, or
section is the accessible account of postmodern and approaches and issues, or even to focus simply on
post-colonial approaches, which is rarely taught at issues. Each chapter has been written to stand alone
this level but constitutes the fundamental epistemol- without requiring the assignment of previous chap-
ogy for much recent work in development. The next ters, although the collection is organized in such a
section, ‘International Development Actors’, com- way as to permit the instructor to draw connections
prising Chapter 7–12, explains various significant between theory, actors, and issues when the student
external and internal forces that attempt to shape moves sequentially from the first chapters to the last.
developmental outcomes. The final section, ‘Issues in At the same time, the breadth and depth of chapters
International Development’, consisting of Chapters make it possible for an instructor to pick and choose
13–27, applies what has been learned in the first two the elements of the text that correspond with his or
sections to a wide variety of issue-areas. The book is her course design.
designed to teach the student by establishing a series In this respect, we hope that Introduction to Inter-
of layers that progressively deepen the student’s national Development: Approaches, Actors, and
knowledge of international development theory and Issues will play an important role in providing stu-
practice. dents from multidisciplinary backgrounds with what
At the end of an introductory course, then, the is required to understand a wide range of develop-
student has not just accumulated knowledge about ment issue-areas and help to launch them into this
development issues but, much more fundamentally, challenging and rewarding discipline that combines
has learned how to approach and study development. values, reflection, and action.
Flexibility For Teaching Paul Alexander Haslam, Jessica Schafer, Pierre Beaudet
In addition to the need to ground a multidisciplinary School of International Development and Global
audience with a common theoretical tool kit, an Studies, University of Ottawa
introductory textbook also needs to be pedagogically June 2011
Erwin A. Alampay is assistant professor in the Cédric Jourde is assistant professor at the School of
National College of Public Administration and Gov- Political Studies, University of Ottawa.
ernance at the University of the Philippines.
Khalid Koser is associate dean and head of the New
Eric Allina is associate professor in the Department Issues in Security Programme at the Geneva Centre
of History at the University of Ottawa. for Security Policy.
Samir Amin is an economist and president of the Anne Latendresse is a professor in the Department
World Forum for Alternatives and the Third-World of Geography at l’Université du Québec à Montréal.
Forum.
Daniel Lavan is a doctoral candidate in the Faculty
Pierre Beaudet is a replacement professor in the of Education at the University of Ottawa.
School of International Development and Global
Studies at the University of Ottawa. Richard Maclure is a professor and former acting dean
at the University of Ottawa’s Faculty of Education.
Lisa Bornstein is assistant professor of urban plan-
ning at McGill University in Montreal. Nissim Mannathukkaren is assistant professor in
the Department of International Development Stud-
Stephen Brown is associate professor of political sci- ies at Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia.
ence at the University of Ottawa.
Andrea Martinez is professor and head of the School
Torunn Wimpelmann Chaudhary is project coordi- of International Development and Global Studies at
nator at the Chr. Michelsen Institute, Norway. the University of Ottawa.
Radhika Desai is professor of political studies in the David R. Morrison is professor emeritus of politics
Department of Political Studies, University of Mani- and international development studies at Trent Uni-
toba, Winnipeg. versity, Peterborough, Ontario.
Gavin Fridell is assistant professor of politics at Trent Joshua Ramisch is associate professor in the School
University, Peterborough, Ontario. of International Development and Global Studies at
the University of Ottawa.
Natacha Gagné is associate professor in the Depart-
ment of Sociology and Anthropology at the Univer- Refaat Sabbah is director general of the Teacher Cre-
sity of Ottawa. ativity Centre, Palestine.
Joseph Hanlon is a senior lecturer in development Eunice N. Sahle is associate professor in the Depart-
and conflict resolution at the International Develop- ment of African and Afro-American Studies and Cur-
ment Centre, Open University, Milton Keynes, Eng- riculum in International Studies at the University of
land, and a visiting senior research fellow at the Crisis North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
States Programme, London School of Economics.
Jessica Schafer is adjunct professor in the School of
Paul A. Haslam is associate professor in the School of International Development and Global Studies at the
International Development and Global Studies at the University of Ottawa.
University of Ottawa.
Ted Schrecker is associate professor of epidemiology
Anil Hira is associate professor of political science and community medicine and principal scientist at
and Latin American studies at Simon Fraser Univer- the Institute of Population Health at the University
sity, Burnaby, British Columbia. of Ottawa.
Deborah Sick is associate professor of anthropology Marcus Taylor is assistant professor in Global Devel-
in the Department of Sociology and Anthropology opment Studies at Queen’s University, Kingston,
and the School of International Development and Ontario.
Global Studies at the University of Ottawa.
Henry Veltmeyer is professor of international devel-
David Sogge is an independent analyst based in opment studies at St Mary’s University, Halifax, Nova
Amsterdam and a fellow of the Transnational Institute. Scotia, and in the Ph.D. Program at the Autonomous
University of Zacatecas.
Astri Suhrke is senior researcher at the Chr. Michelsen
Institute, Norway.
CHAPTER 1
LEARNING OBJECTIVES
• To understand the origins of different labels used to describe the developing world.
• To understand the relationship between national wealth, distribution of income, and poverty.
• To understand why development is considered a multi-dimensional phenomenon and to identify
the major scholars associated with this approach.
• To distinguish the Human Development Index (HDI) from gross domestic product (GDP) as a
measure of development.
• To identify the ethical dilemmas associated with foreign aid and development practice.
WHAT IS THE DEVELOPING packaged breakfast cereals, and pizza. You would
experience home life in many different forms, from
WORLD? nuclear families in suburbia to multi-generational
households, families led by patriarchs with several
If you were a traveller crossing the countries and
wives, single-parent families, and groups of families in
continents of the world, you would immediately
nomadic communities. You would encounter a wide
notice the rich diversity of human experience and
variety of political organizations: kingdoms, duchies,
social organization. You would observe strikingly
and principalities; federal, Islamic, and people’s
different landscapes, from sweeping deserts to
republics; tyrannical, oligarchic, and democratic
lush forests, from scattered farmlands to densely
regimes; commonwealths, unions, and emirates.
populated cities. You would hear up to 7,300 different At the same time, with your traveller’s eyes you
languages (SIL International, 2009). You would see could not fail to notice that certain areas—towns,
a wide range of activities people perform to earn a cities, countries, and regions—exhibit signs of
living, from people driving water buffalo to cultivate material wealth: sumptuously decorated buildings;
rice paddies in peninsular Malaysia to educated abundant consumer goods; energy-intensive
young people sitting at computers in call centres in activities; a highly developed infrastructure of roads,
Bangalore, India, answering customer service queries telecommunications, hospitals, and schools. By
from London. contrast, other regions and locales are devastatingly
When the travelling made you hungry, you would poor: human dwellings do not protect inhabitants
be treated to foods as different as sadza (cornmeal from the elements; infrastructure is lacking for the
porridge) in Mozambique, haggis (savoury pudding movement of people, goods, and information; people
cooked in an animal’s stomach) in Scotland, and live atop garbage dumps with insufficient food and
sushi (raw fish) in Japan. In all of these places, you health care for survival. Similarly, you would begin
might also find soft drinks, fast-food restaurants, to realize that some human beings enjoy a wide
range of opportunities and choices with respect functioning through individual rational action in
to the way they live their lives while others follow impersonal market transactions. Still other theories of
patterns of survival over which they exercise little development hold that the economic logic of capitalism
control. requires that some countries remain poor while others
International development studies aims to explain profit (see Chapter 3). And some theorists reject the
both the diversity evident in the world in relation concept of development altogether, heralding an era
to human well-being and the common patterns of ‘post-development’ (see Chapter 4).
that emerge when comparing people, social groups, But before we get to the theories put forward
nations, economic and political systems, and regions to explain global development, poverty, wealth,
of the world. Some explanations are based on historical and human well-being, we need to understand
evidence, finding the causes of today’s poverty in the some concepts that are central in international
actions (and injustices) of past societies. For example, development. The next section considers the words
it can be argued that colonial conquest and occupation and labels that scholars, practitioners, and the
by European military and political powers caused popular media use in talking about development.
poverty in colonized societies and left them with Following that, we introduce different concepts of
economic structures that made development difficult poverty and measurements of human development.
if not impossible (see Chapter 2). Other explanations The final two sections address global ethics and
for worldwide patterns of wealth and poverty focus on ethical issues for development researchers and
the results of impersonal economic ‘laws’ and their practitioners.
PHOTO 1.1 Diversity of family organization: a chief and his three wives.
Source: Jessica Schafer
the clergy and the nobility. The Third Estate had a and static denotation? Some Eastern European
very diverse membership, from peasants virtually countries with low scores on the Human Development
enslaved under feudal lords to bourgeois merchants Index (discussed below) are not commonly considered
with great wealth, who had little in common part of the Third World, whereas countries of South
apart from exclusion from the nobility and clergy. America may be automatically included even though
Similarly, the Third World to which Sauvy referred in some of them, such as Argentina and Chile, have
the 1950s included countries with diverse economic, achieved high human development scores.
social, and political histories, which were following Finally, many are unhappy with the way the term
widely varied trajectories of development. Gradually, ‘Third World’ seems to imply a world hierarchy and
though, the term ‘Third World’ took on connotations a single path to development success, just as the term
primarily related to poverty at the national level. ‘underdeveloped areas’ did.
The deepening hostilities of the Cold War during In the 1970s, a new term emerged as a result
the 1950s meant increasing political tensions and of economic transformation among a number of
rivalries between the ideologically opposed First and countries formerly considered part of the ‘developing
Second Worlds (respectively, the nations of the North world’: the Newly Industrialized Countries (NICs).
Atlantic Treaty Organization and those of the Warsaw These countries included Hong Kong, South Korea,
Pact or Soviet bloc). The Non-Aligned Movement Singapore, and Taiwan. More recently, Thailand,
(NAM) brought some political unity to the group of India, Mexico, Brazil, China, South Africa, Turkey, and
countries outside the two superpower blocs following Malaysia have been added to the NIC category. They
a conference in 1955 in Bandung, Indonesia, and the are sometimes also referred to as ‘emerging markets’,
first official Non-Aligned Movement summit in 1961 a term that suggests they are perceived by the leaders
in Belgrade, Yugoslavia. In this context, the term of global capitalist enterprises as potential markets to
‘Third World’, like the NAM, suggested a political bloc target for profit but also that once they have shown
that provided an alternative to the ideological power willingness to embrace the rules of market economics,
groupings (see Chapters 3 and 10). Although the they may be admitted into the coveted circle of
First World and Second World designations became acceptable participants in global economic exchange.
irrelevant with the fall of the Berlin Wall in 1989, the Fry and Martin (1991: 51) list four economic criteria
term ‘Third World’ remains. Apart from a wavering by which NIC status is determined: (1) manufactured
degree of political unity provided through the Non- goods contributing 30 per cent of gross domestic
Aligned Movement—which does not include all of product (GDP); (2) manufactured goods as 50 per
the countries often labelled ‘Third World’ and whose cent of total exports; (3) a shift in employment from
membership and political role have fluctuated over agriculture to industry; (4) per capita income of at
the years since its creation—it is difficult to identify least US$2,000. This understanding of development
any enduring similarities among the countries that will be explored further in Chapters 3 and 7.
have been referred to under this category over the The term ‘developing country’ was proposed as a
past 50-plus years. Although ‘Third World’ is still more optimistic term than either ‘underdeveloped’
sometimes used in international development circles, or ‘Third World’. Its opposite is ‘developed countries’,
numerous questions have been raised about its value. those deemed to have reached a certain level of
Is it a sufficiently clear and useful term, given that economic success. A country’s GDP was the standard
there are no precise criteria to identify whether a measure used in the past to classify countries as
given country falls within the category or not? developed or developing, but this classification
Does the label have negative connotations? A produced anomalies. GDP is a measure of the value of
glance at recent public discussions on the Internet goods and services produced in a national economy
about which countries should be considered Third and can be high as a result of natural resource wealth,
World suggests that many people feel it is a pejorative, even when other sectors of its economy and social
patronizing term and therefore prefer their own well-being may not show signs of development such
country not to be included within the category. as industrialization, increased life expectancy, or
Is it ever possible for a country to move out of the higher levels of education. For example, Equatorial
Third World category, or is it a historically determined Guinea, an African country that saw its GDP shoot up
in the mid-1990s with the discovery of oil reserves, to refer to low- and middle-income economies, but it
would have been included in the ‘developed’ category officially recognizes that this terminology should not
simply on the basis of per capita GDP. Yet other key be taken to imply that these economies are making
indicators of human well-being in the country, such ‘progress’ towards development or that those that do
as life expectancy and literacy, remain very low. These not fall into the two groups have already achieved
problems with economic measurement are developed ‘development’. (See the World Bank website for more
further in the next section. detail.)
The World Bank has established its own system of The term Fourth World has come into usage more
classification, partitioning countries into low-, middle-, recently, although it is not yet common or central in
and high-income groups as a basis for determining the the international development lexicon. It has been
loan programs for which a country is eligible to apply. used in two quite distinct ways. One is to denote
It uses a measure of gross national income (GNI), the poorest of the poor countries, often the ‘failed
calculated according to its own formula but basically states’ of recent parlance, which have experienced
similar to GDP or GNP (gross national product).1 The serious setbacks in human well-being and political
wide range of national income levels across the globe governance, typically in connection with armed
is illustrated by Figure 1.1. The World Bank has further conflict, such as Somalia and Afghanistan. The other
subdivided the categories to include lower-middle- and earlier use of ‘Fourth World’, derived from the
income and upper-middle-income groups. There is work in the 1970s of the Canadian Aboriginal leader
also a second category of high-income countries: and writer, George Manuel, is in reference to the
those belonging to the Organization for Economic internal colonization of Aboriginal peoples, whose
Co-operation and Development (OECD). In World status and citizenship rights vary considerably globally
Bank reports, the term ‘developing economies’ is used but who have frequently suffered dispossession and
30,000
10,000
GNI (PPP) Per Capita
1,000
abrogation of political, economic, social, and cultural approaches. Suggesting that large swaths of the
rights within countries where the dominant settler world ‘are inhabited by generic populations, with
group has acted as a colonizer (see Chapter 24). generic characteristics and generic landscapes’, can
Discontent with ‘Third World’ and ‘developing’ or therefore be problematic, not just symbolically but
‘underdeveloped’, for many of the reasons mentioned, also practically (Crush, 1995: 15).
has prompted people to adopt alternative words to Global South has gained favour in the development
refer to the subjects of international development, community more recently and appears better able
such as ‘two-thirds world’ and ‘majority world’. These to incorporate the centrality of historical and
terms highlight the fact that the overwhelming contemporary patterns of wealth and power into a
majority of the world’s population are the targets, loosely geographically defined concept. The phrase
subjects, or objects of development. The idea of may take better account of the fact that poverty and
strength-in-numbers underlies the hopefulness of social conditions formerly identified with the Third
these terms. World are to be found throughout the world and not
The label ‘South’ seems to provide a neutral way simply in one geographical region.
of referring to countries because it emphasizes Examining language and discourses of development
geographical location over other characteristics. Yet helps us to illuminate the deeper ideas and beliefs
using ‘South’ to refer to countries that qualify as the underlying development practice and policies. We
targets for development does imply characteristics need to be aware that how we talk about development
beyond simply location in the southern hemisphere, shapes and is shaped by our culturally informed
since Australia and New Zealand, for example, are assumptions and historical position, as well as by
donor rather than recipient countries in international existing relations of power and knowledge. Words
development, while some countries in the northern or labels, which appear to be non-political, natural,
hemisphere receive aid and exhibit socio-economic or instinctively rational, should be examined for the
characteristics similar to countries of the South. ways they may mask practices of control, regulation,
Grouping countries (which in themselves are and reproduction of particular power configurations
historically constructed conceptual entities rather or policy processes. In addition, by superimposing
than simple geographical facts) under a label such as new labels on existing practices, we run the risk of
the ‘South’ implies a degree of homogeneity that is creating the illusion of reform while leaving power
too simplistic and may justify blueprint managerial relations underlying the labels unchanged (Adams,
1995). Yet, at the same time, we should recognize GDP per capita is an extremely useful way of
the possibility for creativity in discursive practice comparing levels of development. It also gives us
and search for ways in which language can be a force the most widely used measure of how countries
for transformation (Wood, 1985). We should not are improving (or deteriorating) in their level of
assume that concepts or practices of ‘development’ development. GDP growth rates (the percentage
are fully determined by those who believe themselves change in national income between any two years)
to be their architects. Instead, we need to recognize are like the Academy Awards of the developing
the agency exercised by those who have responded world, clearly indicating which economies have been
to, reacted to, and resisted being the objects of performing (in terms of adding wealth) and which
development (Crush, 1995: 8). have not. The top-performing economies in the
developing world may have growth rates exceeding
10 per cent per annum—such as China in the early
GROWTH, INEQUALITY, 2000s—but others may post negative rates, as was the
POVERTY, AND case for much of sub-Saharan Africa during the 1980s
DEVELOPMENT and early 1990s. However, growth rates in developing
countries, where the economy might be based on a
Although vast diversity exists in the standards of living few exported products or resources, are very volatile
between, among, and within developing countries— and may be high one year and low the next. In
and even within the developed world—it remains contrast, developed countries generally have slower
difficult to define concisely what ‘development’ is GDP growth rates, usually between 2 and 3.5 per cent,
and how exactly to measure it. Different approaches but these rates are more stable over time. One of the
to defining ‘development’ reveal different aspects world’s most prominent development economists,
of the problem: distinguishing between levels of Jeffrey Sachs, has argued that the current gulf in wealth
industrialization, considering different segments of between the developed and developing countries is
the population, looking specifically at poverty, and almost entirely caused by small differences in growth
determining whether development is an ‘ideal’ or rates over the period since 1820. In 1820, he argues,
represents aspiration for betterment. the difference in GDP per capita between developed
and developing countries was relatively small (only
Growth
4:1), but two centuries of differential growth rates
Development has most frequently been equated with have led to a twenty-fold gap (Sachs, 2005: 29–31).
growth of the economy over a prolonged period of Rapid growth in GDP is usually caused by rapid
time. This approach was most common during the increases in productivity in agriculture, natural
1950s and 1960s under the influence of theories such resource extraction, or industrialization. When
as Walt Rostow’s in his 1960 book, Stages of Economic GDP per capita reaches the level of a middle-income
Growth (see Chapter 3), but this approach remains developing country, it usually means that a certain
prevalent today. When the World Bank compares the level of industrialization has been reached, including
level of development of different countries, it typically the production of manufactured goods such as
ranks them by their average income per inhabitant— textiles and consumer durables (refrigerators, cars)
or GDP per capita—although the Bank prefers the and of some intermediate goods such as steel and
term ‘gross national income’. GDP per capita figures petrochemicals. It was generally assumed that growth
also are adjusted by purchasing power parities (PPPs), of national wealth (as measured by GDP per capita)
which take into account the different buying power of would ‘trickle down’ to the poorest segments of
a dollar in different economies. This gives an average society in such a way that most people would benefit.
income per person that allows us to compare the In other words, development, viewed through the
annual incomes of, for example, an average American prism of increasing GDP per capita, was about copying
who earns $45,592 to the average Nigerian who earns the industrialization experience of the West.
$1,969. This kind of comparison reveals that the But it should not be forgotten that GDP per capita
United States is the world’s ninth richest country and is a measure of the average income in a country.
Nigeria is one of the world’s poorest—158th out of 182. There are numerous problems with GDP per capita,
including that it is an estimate that depends on the and women struggle in abject poverty. But income
quality of information collected by government inequality is also an important constraint on
statistical agencies and that it fails to count the ‘value’ development. It means that growth often comes from
of non-market subsistence activities, which may be the richer segment of the economy and is less likely to
quite important in less-developed rural areas (for a translate into poverty reduction by ‘trickling down’ to
trenchant critique, see Seers, 1979: 14–17). Although a the poor. Poverty is always eliminated more quickly
good indicator of the degree of industrialization, GDP when GDP growth is combined with improvements
tells us relatively little about the extent of poverty— (greater equality) in the distribution of income.
specifically, what proportion of the population Societies in developing countries tend to be much
is extremely poor—or whether growth is in fact more unequal than societies in developed countries.
‘trickling down’ to the poor. It is possible for countries Latin America, although an upper-middle-income
to grow rapidly in GDP per capita but for only the area of the developing world, is also the region with
richest segments of society to benefit. In this respect, the most unequal distribution of income. This means
development cannot be as simple as GDP growth, that the super-rich and the super-poor coexist in the
because growth does not necessarily reduce poverty. same countries. Mexico, for example, has the richest
man on the list of the world’s richest people, India
Inequality has the fourth and fifth richest men, and citizens of
In order to know how many poor people there are the developing world as a whole occupy 27 of the
in a given country and whether they are benefiting top 100 places (Forbes, 2010). Brazil, one of the most
from the overall growth of the economy, we need to unequal countries in the world, has European-trained
include another concept: the distribution of income. elites and a world-class aeronautics industry—but
The distribution of income (also known as income also favelas (Portuguese for ‘slums’) surrounding its
inequality) is a measure of how the wealth of a country major modern and cosmopolitan cities such as São
is distributed among its population: what share of Paulo. The share of national income appropriated
that wealth is owned by the rich, and how much the by the richest 20 per cent and that appropriated
poorest earn in comparison to the wealthiest. Indeed, by the poorest 20 per cent hardly changed over
income inequality is the direct link between GDP per the 1981–2001 period, despite significant growth
capita and the number of people living in poverty. that resulted in the doubling of per capital income.
Income inequality can be measured in two ways: In 2001 the top quintile took home almost 62 per
a comparison of the income earned by different cent of the national income while the bottom
strata of the population and the Gini coefficient. quintile only pocketed 2.5 per cent. The degree
Income inequality is often evaluated by dividing the of inequality between the top 10 per cent and the
population into five or ten equally populous strata, bottom 10 per cent is even more pronounced: 43
known respectively as ‘quintiles’ or ‘deciles’, and per cent and 1.1 per cent of the national income in
comparing the average incomes of these different 2007, respectively. Table 1.1 demonstrates that very
strata to each other. A standard comparison is little changed in regard to income distribution over
between the earnings of the wealthiest 20 per cent the 20-year period from 1981 to 2002, yet it also
of the population and the poorest 40 per cent (the shows reason for hope. In the 2002–7 period (the
ninth and tenth deciles compared to the first to latest date for which there are figures), the Brazilian
fourth deciles). However, the Gini coefficient is the government made a concerted attempt to channel
most commonly used measure of income inequality. resources to the poorest sectors of society, resulting
It is a number between 0 and 1, with relatively equal in some improvement in the distribution of income
societies such as the Scandinavian countries scoring (see Figure 1.2).
around 0.25 while very unequal societies like Brazil The realization that income inequality makes
score around 0.6.2 the task of raising people out of poverty even more
Income inequality is important in part because it difficult has led to the current focus of international
forces us to confront the injustice in most developing organizations and research on ‘growth with equity’,
societies: that a privileged minority lead luxurious which seeks to combine the goal of GDP growth with
lives while the vast majority of their own countrymen the goal of distributing the benefits of that growth to
15% 1998–01
2001–04
2004–07
7.4% 3.4%
2.2%
1.4%
10% 0.7% 0.5%
Average annual growth rate
0.0%
0% –0.6%
–0.6% –0.6%
–0.2% –0.4% –0.3% –1.3% –1.4%
–1.9%
–1.3% –2.8%
–1.6%
–1.6%
–5%
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Income decile
FIGURE 1.2 Average Annual Growth Rate in Per Capita Incomes by Decile, 1998–2007
Source: International Policy Centre for Inclusive Growth, ‘What explains the decline in Brazil’s inequality?’, One Pager, No. 89 (2009), at: www.ipc-undp.
org/pub/IPCOnePager89.pdf.
and the developed world. In other words, although adequate income to cover the needs of basic survival;
GDP per capita is a good indicator of poverty as employment (including any non-paid social role
income deprivation, it does not tell the whole that contributes to self-respect and development of
story. Consequently, alleviating poverty or doing the personality); improvement in the distribution of
development also must be much more complicated income; an education, particularly literacy; political
than simply spurring economic growth or even participation; and national autonomy (belonging to
reducing poverty. Three thinkers in particular have a politically and economically independent nation).
been fundamental in redefining how poverty, and Denis Goulet, writing at about the same time,
therefore development, should be understood. asserted that development should promote ‘life-
The idea that development involved much more sustenance’ (the basic requirements for survival—
than economic growth or an increase in income food, clothing, health, and shelter), self-esteem (or
per capita began to gain ground in the late 1960s, dignity and identity of the individual), and freedom
promoted by development theorists and practitioners (an expanded range of choice and freedom from
such as Dudley Seers and Denis Goulet. The arguments ‘servitudes’) (Goulet, 1971: 87–97; Seers, 1979: 10–13;
of these scholars have led to an understanding of Todaro, 1989).
poverty and development as multi-dimensional. It is evident that those closely involved in
Seers rephrased the question of how to develop by development were beginning to see growth as
asking, ‘What are the necessary conditions for a an inadequate measure of development and even
universally acceptable aim, the realization of the entertained the possibility that rising incomes,
potential of human personality?’ (Seers, 1979: 10). although they improved the ability of individuals
He concluded that six conditions were necessary: to meet basic physical needs, might not contribute
PHOTO 1.3 Inequality: hillside slums and the beachfront, Rio de Janeiro.
Source: Paul Alexander Haslam
to ‘development’ in its more sophisticated and China, Sri Lanka, or Costa Rica despite having much
multi-dimensional aspects. These ideas were higher incomes. Furthermore, male African Americans
further developed in the work of Nobel Prize- from Harlem were even worse off than the average,
winning economist Amartya Sen, who argues that being less likely to reach the age of 40 than men in
development should not be seen simply as rising Bangladesh (ibid., 21–3). In this example, Sen shows
income levels but rather as an increase in individuals’ that African-American men suffered from restrictions
substantive freedoms. His approach is often called on their ‘capabilities’ despite having incomes much
‘development as freedom’, after the title of his higher than people in the other countries cited. It is
popular 1999 book, or the capabilities approach. As important to underline that, for Sen, although freedom
Sen puts it, the real value of wealth and income is (including free markets) has intrinsic value and does not
that ‘they are admirable general-purpose means for have to be justified in terms of outcomes, a significant
having more freedom to lead the kind of lives we part of the expansion of capabilities (ability to access
have reason to value’ (Sen, 1999: 14). In this respect, freedoms) comes through access to government services.
Sen sees poverty primarily as kinds of ‘unfreedom’ Therefore, Sen sees the ability to access education,
or deprivation of freedoms that limit the ability of health care, and unemployment insurance as central
individuals to improve their lives. Such unfreedoms elements that expand people’s capabilities. The inverse
may include a lack of access to health and welfare of this observation is that sometimes low income does
services, gender or ethnic discrimination, and not reflect the opportunities people have. This should be
limits on basic political, civic, and economic rights. intrinsically clear to students in a university or college
According to Sen, lack of freedom can be the result of setting where their income (measured by summer
either processes (denial of rights normally considered earnings) would put them below the national poverty
‘procedural’, like political, civic, and human rights) line. In no way does this income level reflect the real
or the opportunities that people have (inability to capabilities and freedoms commanded by students or
feed themselves, receive an education, access health the opportunities before them.
services, avoid premature morbidity) (ibid., 14–17). Sen’s work has been instrumental (together with
The key to Sen’s argument, therefore, is the way in that of Seers and Goulet) in opening the door to
which the expansion of people’s capabilities—that is, more multi-dimensional measures of development
their ability to lay claim to or access various resources that go beyond the ubiquitous GDP per capita. In
(such as civil and political rights and government defence of GDP per capita, it is easily measured,
services)—can improve their ability to make choices and levels of absolute and moderate poverty can be
that they value. At the same time, an increased clearly established according to certain income cut-
ability to make choices feeds back to build their off points. Even one of its most ardent detractors,
‘capabilities’. One can imagine, for example, how the Dudley Seers, referred to GDP per capita as a ‘very
right to vote and participate in political decisions convenient indicator’ (Seers, 1979: 9). However, is it
could lead to governmental decisions that increase possible to measure a multi-dimensional concept like
local educational opportunities, which in turn could Sen’s ‘development as freedom’? Some authors have
expand the choices of those who had participated in criticized such an approach as being impossible to
the political process by voting. Sen writes, ‘Greater quantify (Rist, 1997: 10). Nonetheless, efforts have
freedom enhances the ability of people to help been made to construct measures that better capture
themselves and also to influence the world, and these the multi-dimensional aspects of development. The
matters are central to the process of development’ best known is the Human Development Index, or
(ibid., 18). Sen makes it clear, therefore, that level of HDI, of the United Nations Development Programme
income does not relate directly to ‘development’ and (UNDP), constructed with input from Amartya Sen.
that poverty is better seen as the deprivation of basic The annual Human Development Report, which
capabilities or freedoms. ranks the countries of the world by their HDI
Sen points to a number of compelling examples to score, is the UNDP’s flagship publication and was
illustrate his argument, including the fact that, using developed in 1990 as an alternative and more multi-
data from1993, African Americans (on average) had a dimensional measure of development than GDP per
lower probability of reaching old age than citizens of capita. Many people see it as an intellectual and
philosophical challenge to the World Bank’s annual development (see Chapter 13 for an in-depth discussion
publication, the World Development Report, which of HPI and the MDGs).
continues to use GNI per capita as a measure of
development. The Human Development Index is a
composite measure of three equally weighted factors: GLOBAL ETHICS AND
a long and healthy life, knowledge, and standard of INTERNATIONAL
living. A long and healthy life is measured by life
expectancy at birth; knowledge is a composite of the
DEVELOPMENT
adult literacy rate and the combined gross enrolment You are reading this book because you have an interest
ratio for primary, secondary, and post-secondary in international development and, by extension, in
schools; and standard of living is measured by GDP the global distribution of wealth and power, well-
per capita. In this respect, the index recognizes that being and poverty. It may seem obvious, therefore,
income levels are important but that other factors that the negative consequences of poverty for human
also are significant in human development. One health and well-being are on the whole a bad thing,
may view the education and longevity measures as both within your own country and in other countries
proxies that take account of the various government throughout the world. You probably also believe that
services that Seers, Goulet, and Sen see as crucial it follows logically from this that we should take
to expanding the range of individual choice. action to avoid, mitigate, or reverse poverty wherever
Indeed, the first Human Development Report (1990) possible—and not just within our own country.
was explicit about this link, noting that ‘Human However, while few people would argue that poverty
development is a process of enlarging people’s is not a bad thing, the further belief that we should
choices’ (UNDP, 1990: 10). take action to address poverty is not universally
For the UNDP, countries with a HDI score of 0.8 or shared. In addition, even among those who do accept
more are considered highly developed, while those that action should be taken to address global poverty,
with a score of 0.5 or less are considered to have low there are intense intellectual and political debates over
development. In the 2009 Human Development how we can justify action on global poverty and what
Report, classifications are given for 182 countries in the actions are justified. Several influential approaches to
following categories: very high human development global poverty have had an impact on these debates
(38), high human development (45), medium human within the field of international development and
development (75), and low human development (24), on policy action. Following an examination of these
with HDI values ranging on a scale between 0 and 1. approaches, in this section we will explore dilemmas
The HDI shows that many countries rank much higher that you, as a student of international development,
in ‘human development’ than average per capita might face when assessing your options for action
income would predict. Even Norway, holding the or when taking part in international development
number one spot on the HDI, does not do as well in policy-making or practice.
converting GDP per capita to human development as Central to the international development arena is a
neighbouring Sweden, which holds the number seven simple question: Do our moral duties extend beyond
spot but has slightly higher life expectancy and a GDP our families, neighbours, and fellow citizens?
per capita almost $17,000 less than Norway. Perhaps Over the course of the twentieth century, most
most importantly, the HDI has embedded the idea Western societies developed systems of social
of poverty and development as a multi-dimensional support to ensure that no citizen would be left to
phenomenon in the modern approach to development. die or suffer severe deprivation as a result of poverty.
New indicators such as the UNDP’s Human Poverty The welfare state was justified on both moral and
Index (HPI) show that multi-dimensional approaches pragmatic grounds. Morally, one argument for the
have entered the mainstream. Even the Millennium social security system was a recognition that national
Development Goals (MDGs), the comprehensive economies based on the (relatively) free workings of
framework that is supposed to focus the activities of all the market left many individuals in a position of
bilateral and multilateral aid agencies, can be viewed insecurity and deprivation through no fault of their
as operationalizing a multi-dimensional approach to own (that is, as a result of the system) (see Titmuss,
TABLE 1.2 Countries Ranked by HDI and GNP Per Capita, 2009
HDI Ranking 2009 Country (according HDI Score GDP Per Capita (PPP GDP Per Capita
to World Bank $US) Ranking
categories)
‘Development’ is a contested term. There are debates practice of development call into question the validity
surrounding the meaning of development, contestation of the contemporary development enterprise. They
over the best approach to achieve development, and emphasize the destructive and disciplinary power of
even questions about whether it is worth pursuing development in its interventions in and transformations
at all (see Chapter 3). Today’s dominant usage of of non-Western societies (see Chapter 4). Development
‘development’, in which it is understood as virtually can be seen to have changed societies for the worse,
synonymous with economic growth and modernity, rather than improving people’s lives as development
emerged in the post-World War II period. However, discourse would have us believe (Watts, 1995: 45).
ideas about human progress that undergird this Gilbert Rist (1997, 2007) refers to development
vision of development are rooted in the European as a ‘toxic word’ because it necessarily entails the
Enlightenment. destruction of both the environment and social bonds
With the rise of industrial capitalism in the in the process of transforming natural and human
eighteenth century, many philosophers began to see resources into economic commodities. In fact, Rist
history as linear, as having an ultimate destination, sees ‘development’ as a discourse that legitimates the
a ‘progression to the better’ as German philosopher global expansion of capitalism while simultaneously
Georg Hegel saw it (Leys, 1996: 4). At the same time, obfuscating its negative effects on people.
capitalism’s transformation of society gave rise to new However, development is not a homogeneous
social ills, such as dispossession, unemployment, and project. Development, ‘for all its power to speak
poverty, and many saw the need for an antidote to and to control the terms of speaking, has never
these problems. Ideas of economic progress and social been impervious to challenge and resistance, nor,
transformation were taken up and expressed through in response, to reformulation and change’ (Crush,
the European colonial enterprise, in complex ways and 1995: 8). Just as a body of scholarship has uncovered
diverse forms. In particular, it has been suggested that the interactions and mutual shaping that took place
the idea of development was based on the Eurocentric during the colonial encounter between (multiple)
idea of ‘trusteeship’—those who were already colonizers and (multiple) colonized peoples (see
‘developed’ could act on behalf of those individuals Chapter 2), research is also emerging that explores the
and societies that were yet to realize their potential ways people who are the ‘objects’ of development
(Cowen and Shenton, 1995). policy subvert and in turn transform the people, ideas,
Some thinkers, such as Arturo Escobar (1992), projects, agencies, and societies that are held up as
argue that the colonial roots of the concept and the paradigm of the developed world (Scott, 1990).
1963, 1968). Society charged the state, therefore, defenders of Western capitalism perceived a political
with providing security for all citizens through threat from the socialist alternatives to market
programs such as unemployment insurance, income capitalism proposed by groups within these societies
assistance, universal health care, and education. and pursued by other nations such as the Soviet
From a pragmatic point of view, the welfare state, Union.
by ensuring a minimum standard of living for all, In the mid-twentieth century, anti-colonial
would prevent the proliferation of other social ills, uprisings in Asia and Africa propelled that debate
such as crime, and meant that a healthy, educated to a global level, prompting an ambiguous response
population would result in a stronger economy. At from the Global North. This was the beginning of
the same time, geopolitical interests played a role international development. Although tainted by self-
in the formation of social assistance policies, since interest and geopolitical considerations, development
also was inspired by a perceived moral obligation to regardless of where they happen to live or where
help the poor nations. In the beginning, tremendous they happen to have been born, and regardless of
excitement and enthusiasm accompanied the idea of their race or gender, class or citizenship (O’Neill,
international development in both the North and 2000: 45). National boundaries are therefore of
the South. However, while the welfare state became little or no moral importance in considerations of
ubiquitous among European and North American justice. The majority of cosmopolitans also believe
nations—although the interpretation of basic needs that some common values apply across humanity
and rights of citizens has varied substantially among and some responsibilities exist towards all humanity
these nations (see Esping-Andersen, 1990)—a global (Dower, 1998, cited in Gasper, 2005: 9). Des Gasper’s
institution equivalent to national welfare state typology of global ethics (2007) points out, however,
agencies has not emerged to take responsibility that belief in the low moral importance of national
for guaranteeing security and meeting the basic boundaries does not always entail a further belief that
needs of all people through similar forms of wealth we have extensive responsibilities to promote pan-
redistribution and universal public service provisions. human values and responsibilities. Libertarians, for
Nonetheless, many people believe that the principles example, also accord low value to national boundaries
of basic human rights and security should apply to but do not believe in strong duties towards others
all humans, regardless of where they happen to live individually, nationally, or globally (see below for
in the world. Thus, we have moved from a time when further discussion of libertarianism).
most discussions about distributive justice were Nonetheless, the majority of cosmopolitan theorists
concerned primarily with distribution within states believe that national boundaries are not of overriding
to a time when many are considering arguments ethical importance and that global justice entails a
surrounding distributive justice globally, or what has substantial set of responsibilities to people throughout
become known as global ethics. the world. Within this body of cosmopolitan
thinking, Charles Jones (1999) identifies three main
types of justification for global redistributive justice:
Cosmopolitan Arguments for Global
a consequentialist ethic (as exemplified in the works
Redistribution of Peter Singer); a contractarian ethic (as in the works
Those who argue that principles of justice imply a of Charles Beitz and Thomas Pogge); and a rights-
moral obligation to address the needs of the poor based ethic (Jones’s own position and that of Henry
not only within national boundaries but beyond Shue). These three views are outlined in Box 1.3.
these borders largely fall within the philosophical Peter Singer’s argument is that if we can take action
category referred to as cosmopolitanism. According to prevent people from dying of starvation without
to cosmopolitanism, justice is owed to all people compromising anything else of equal moral value, an
impartial view of justice would clearly say that we are give a portion of his/her income towards preventing
morally bound to take that action. Box 1.4 presents starvation, other serious suffering, and preventable
an example he offers readers to persuade them of the causes of death.
moral correctness of this position. Thomas Pogge (2002, 2005) argues for the moral
If Singer’s position is correct, we can draw the duty to address world poverty using different
conclusion that we should be giving away all of the justifications. He suggests that one of the main reasons
‘surplus’ income we have as long as it does not cause we have a moral duty to alleviate global poverty is
us to give up something of greater moral value than because we are causally responsible for the current
the lives of people facing starvation anywhere in the situation. He supports this argument in several ways.
world. One might characterize this as the ‘Mother First, he argues that the current situation of radical
Teresa’ approach (Doyle, 2006) or radical sacrifice global inequality emerged as a result of the way
(Gasper, 1986: 141), since it seems to require that we today’s wealthy countries ruled over poor countries
give up everything we have until we are in a similar during the colonial era: ‘trading their people like
position of poverty and have nothing left to give cattle, destroying their political institutions and
that would prevent another person from dying of cultures, taking their lands and natural resources,
starvation. and forcing products and customs upon them’ (Pogge,
One objection to this position is that it is too 2005: 2). Even if today’s citizens of the world’s rich
idealistic. Surely it is not a good policy to argue in countries are not responsible for what their ancestors
favour of a morality that seems so difficult to follow did in the past, they equally have no claim to the
and is so unlikely to be taken up by the majority of fruits of their ancestors’ actions—that is, the greater
people. Singer therefore proposes that although we wealth they have inherited. Similar premises underlie
should accept the stringent moral duty as required by the argument by Walter Rodney (1972), an influential
principles of justice, we could promote a more feasible Guyanese writer, that international development and
policy for people actually to follow. For example, assistance are simply a way to give back what already
everyone could be encouraged (perhaps required) to had been taken from the Global South.
Another argument Pogge provides takes a They are the most basic interests we have, because
contractarian approach (see Box 1.3). He holds that ‘without food, shelter, and a reasonable level of health
an economic order should be considered unjust if it maintenance, human lives are simply not possible’
causes massive and severe human rights deficits that (Jones, 1999: 58). Furthermore, without the basic
could be avoided under a different and practically right to subsistence, a person cannot exercise any
possible institutional arrangement. He argues other rights, including those that have often been
that this is clearly the case with the current global taken as fundamental in Western liberal democratic
economic order, which preserves the advantages societies, such as freedom of expression or other
of the wealthy and allows serious and avoidable political rights.
deprivation among the poor, despite there being a To say that a right exists also implies corresponding
‘feasible institutional alternative under which such duties: not to contravene the right, to protect the
severe and extensive poverty would not persist’ right from being contravened by others, and to aid
(Pogge, 2005: 4). By preserving the current system, the rights-bearer to attain the right. Not all states,
we (including citizens of wealthy nations, our however, are currently in a position to ensure the
governments, the corporations they run or support, right to subsistence for all of their citizens because
and their participation in international institutions) some lack sufficient resources. This means that states
are contributing to the causes of global poverty. Thus, with more than they need to ensure the fulfillment
according to Pogge, our obligation to address world of the right to subsistence should redistribute wealth
poverty is based at least in part on our duty not to and resources to states unable either to provide
harm others. subsistence rights to their citizens or to protect those
What about the argument that national factors rights (ibid., 70). Hence, a rights-based approach to
within poor countries also are responsible for justice also can provide moral justification for global
problems of poverty, such as the greed of ruling redistribution of wealth in order to protect and aid all
elites, corruption, and poor planning? Pogge argues peoples in achieving the right to subsistence.
that these internal causes of poverty do not negate
the fact that global institutions are implicated in the
persistence of serious poverty and therefore bear some
Arguments against Global
responsibility for it. He points to the asymmetrical Redistributive Justice
rules of the World Trade Organization (WTO) that The two main ethical positions opposed to
benefit wealthy countries and disadvantage poorer cosmopolitan approaches to redistributive global
ones (ibid., 6). In addition, global institutions and/ justice are communitarianism and libertarianism.
or Western governments frequently enable bad rulers Communitarianism (exemplified in the works of
to remain in power in poor countries by supplying Michael Walzer, Alasdair MacIntyre, Michael Sandel,
money, weapons, or payments for resource exports. and Charles Taylor) takes issue with the cosmopolitan
This support for bad rulers makes it difficult for assumption that national borders have no moral
citizens of those countries to address the national importance. Instead, communitarians believe that
causes of poverty themselves by removing their political and social community is morally relevant—
corrupt leaders from power. in fact, some feel that moral discussions about what
Rights-based approaches to global justice and the is right and wrong can only be understood among
problem of poverty take the idea of human rights people sharing a common culture, language, history,
as implying duties for individuals, states, and other and so on. In addition, some communitarians suggest
institutions to protect and aid those whose basic that we are justified in giving (moral) preference to
needs are not being met through contemporary the needs of our fellow citizens, because membership
global market economies (see Chapter 13). in the nation creates special bonds, a kind of extended
Charles Jones argues that the right to subsistence version of kinship. If we recognize that we can
(principally food, shelter, and a level of health legitimately treat our family and close relationships
required for basic human functioning) is based on with special care and attention and we believe that
the recognition that these are universally shared citizenship is a similar kind of kinship relation,
human needs and, therefore, are morally important. then it is only right that we treat national borders as
entailing specific rights and duties not extended to just. Individuals should be free to give donations
those outside the boundaries. to poorer people if they so choose, but there is no
Another argument for the special moral importance moral obligation to do so, and there should be no
of national boundaries is that citizens are taking part corresponding demand on the part of a state or other
in a collective enterprise and therefore have a body.
relationship of reciprocity among them that justifies We conclude this consideration of the various
special treatment of fellow citizens over foreigners moral positions on justice and global poverty by
(Callan, 1997, and Feinberg, 1998, cited in Singer, 2002: examining briefly their implications for international
168–9; see also Miller, 1998). In non-philosophical development. If we look at statements by actors and
language, communitarian positions are sometimes institutions in national and international arenas,
referred to as nationalist (Gasper, 1986: 138). In many suggest a widespread belief in universal human
international relations theory, the skeptical realist rights and transnational duties to protect and assist
or international skeptic positions also argue for the people regardless of where they live in the world.
pre-eminent importance of nation-states and their For example, the United Nations refers to common
actions in the international sphere. According to this fundamental values and respect for all human rights as
view, ‘countries (nation states/national States/. . .) important justifications for adopting the Millennium
overwhelmingly do and should pursue their own Development Goals (UN General Assembly, 2005);
(long-term) interests, even when that involves breaking Jeffrey Sachs (2005) refers to poverty as an obstacle
agreements’ (Dower, 1998, cited in Gasper, 2007: 9). to people fulfilling their most basic human rights and
A state would only pursue global redistribution if it achieving their individual potentials; the G8 posits
were in its own interests, without consideration of any that ‘fighting poverty is both a moral imperative
impartial moral obligation. and a necessity for a stable world’ (G8, 2000). These
Libertarian philosophy is best exemplified in the statements suggest a wide acceptance of a rights-
work of Robert Nozick, Anarchy, State and Utopia based and morally principled approach to global
(1974), and it has been influential among a number of justice. ‘Rights talk’ is fashionable, and it would be
development theorists (for example, Deepak Lal and virtually unthinkable for a political leader to deny
Peter Bauer) in the formulation of what is now known the principle underlying universal human rights—
as neo-liberalism (see Gasper, 1986; see also Chapter that all human life is of equal worth.
3 for discussion of neo-liberal development theory). In 1970, the United Nations set a goal for the world’s
Nozick argues for the primacy of the individual wealthiest countries to dedicate 0.7 per cent of their
right to freedom and non-interference, and he places GNP each year to development assistance by 1975,
particular value on the right of individuals to acquire a goal still held up as a benchmark for countries to
and retain private property. He famously characterized achieve. This goal reflects a belief in the obligation
taxation as ‘forced labour’, and it is clear why this to redistribute wealth globally and hence suggests an
position would lead libertarians to oppose any form acceptance of the idea of global redistributive justice.
of obligatory redistribution of wealth, whether within In contrast, much of the actual practice of Western
one country or among countries. aid allocation and broader approaches to global
Another aspect of Nozick’s argument on justice institutions seems to imply a far less consistent view of
is that we should not assess whether the current the moral obligation to address global poverty. A look
state of affairs is just on the basis of outcomes—i.e., at aid figures over the past few decades seems to provide
wealth and poverty—but rather on the basis of just evidence that ‘despite the lip-service most people pay to
procedures (Gasper, 1986: 143). If people obtain their human equality, their circle of concern barely extends
wealth through free action in a market economy— beyond the boundaries of their country’ (Singer, 2002:
rather than through brute force, for example—they 182). Development assistance is frequently allocated
have a right to that wealth and to dispose of it as if it were simply a matter for voluntary individual
precisely as they wish. Thus, the simple existence (or national) conscience and goodwill (if not purely a
of (even extreme) inequality of wealth and poverty matter of self-interest) rather than a moral obligation.
does not indicate injustice; as long as the wealth was (Chapter 8 explores these issues in more detail.) The
obtained legitimately, the situation should be deemed growth of the non-governmental sector relying
on individual donations also can be interpreted as Above all, being ethical as a development worker or
reflecting the principle that addressing global poverty researcher suggests a kind of permanent self-critique
is a matter of voluntary charitable action. We may and evaluation of one’s actions and their effects,
think that it is a good thing to do but not that it is taking care to identify, privilege, and respect the
a duty to address the needs and rights of poor people rights of others over one’s more narrow professional
internationally. objectives (Adams and Megaw, 1997). In other words,
It is clear, then, that moral justifications are highly development ethics subordinates the goals (what we
relevant to principles and practices of international want to do) to the means of development (how we
development. It is equally clear that we, as individuals do it). In the rest of this chapter, we turn to ethical
and as nations, appear to act in ways that are not dilemmas related to positionality and lifestyle that
always consistent with what we profess to believe is development practitioners and researchers may
morally just. As you read this book, you should find expect to face in the field.
yourself reflecting on what might be needed to bring
our beliefs about justice and our actions in the global
sphere more in line with each other.
Power and Positionality
We are always aware when we do not have the power
in a relationship, but well-meaning people—like
ETHICAL BEHAVIOUR the typical development worker—are not always
AND THE DEVELOPMENT aware when they do! As Western middle-class
citizens working for middle-class organizations in
PRACTITIONER largely middle-class societies, many development
Development ethics also addresses the issue of how practitioners are unprepared for the ‘class shift’ that
each of us should behave as development practitioners occurs upon arrival in the Third World—suddenly
and researchers working in the developing world. As they have cars with drivers, accommodation with
Des Gasper (1996: 6) puts it, those who work on the servants and cooks, and people at their beck and
front line ‘need ethical frames by which they can call (ibid., 3). Beyond the novelty, these changes
better understand their situation, structure their also indicate that because of education, country of
choices, avoid debilitating degrees of doubt and guilt, origin, the agency represented, and perhaps ethnic
and move forward.’ background, practitioners are viewed differently by
Although there are differences between the the locals with whom they interact and have more
ethical responsibilities of researchers and those of authority and power than they are used to having at
practitioners, important commonalities between home.
them are required for work in developing countries. This situation is captured by the idea of positionality,
Researchers tend to be principally concerned with the which suggests that researchers or development
issues of informed consent and respect for the privacy practitioners must be aware of and reflect upon the
and confidentiality of those who participate in their social and power relationships in which they are
studies, the implications of relationships of reciprocity embedded, particularly their position relative to
with key local informants (what researchers owe the local people with whom they interact (Binns,
them, if anything), and the benefits of the research for 2006: 19). However, the development practitioner’s
the community (including how to share the findings positionality is not always easy to assess, since all
with them) (Marchall, 1992: 1–3). An overriding projects are ‘riddled and crosscut by relationships
injunction at all times is to ‘do no harm’—to ensure of power’, including funder/employer to researcher/
that the vulnerable are not put at risk as a result of their practitioner and researcher to researched, as well
participation in the research or project (Adams and as power disparities within the local community
Megaw, 1997; Jacobsen and Landau, 2003: 193). These (based on class, literacy, ethnicity, gender, and so
ethical responsibilities are salient for practitioners as on) (Brydon, 2006: 27). Choices made by researchers
well, although informed consent usually translates as and practitioners—such as the social and political
ensuring that participation is willing and voluntary background of principal assistants and translators, the
in the development project at hand. non-governmental organizations (NGOs) they work
1998: 9–10). How a project is carried out will affect More Listening and Less Talking
the local balance of power in ways that are difficult
The personal modesty noted above also applies
to foresee. Taking positionality seriously, therefore,
to the broader issue of how development actors
means that the development practitioner needs to
engage with local people and communities.
reflect on the implications of his or her power position
The ethical guidelines adopted by development
vis-à-vis local power structures and individuals’ self-
NGOs increasingly point to the need to do more
help strategies.
listening and less talking. The code of ethics of
Lifestyle Abroad one prominent NGO asserts: ‘development should
enable people, especially the poor, the oppressed,
Lifestyle, dress, and behaviour abroad are important
and the marginalized, to organize and to improve
to local perceptions. In general, development workers
their political, social, and economic situation’
are expected to live modestly with the people they
(CCIC, 2004: 2.2 [c]). In other words, aid works
are supposed to assist. Professionalism and advanced
when people work with other people as equals.
technical capacity should go hand in hand with high
Although such attitudes may appear self-evident,
moral and ethical standards based on transparency and
there are too many examples of development
democratic accountability. Most development experts
mission staff lecturing politicians from the Global
see hiring and buying locally as an ethical obligation
South ‘like schoolboys’ in a (deliberate?) attempt
to spread the wealth. Likewise, participating in local
to leave them powerless (Klitgaard, 1991, cited in
cultural events, observing local standards of dress and
Gasper, 1999: 24).
modesty, and learning the local language are essential
Today, anyone who wishes to be involved in
elements in building a healthy relationship with local
international development cannot but experience a
partners (Apentiik and Parpart, 2006: 39–40). Tony
great sense of modesty as compared to the kind of
Binns offers some words of advice that apply equally
intellectual arrogance that was prevalent in the past.
to the researcher and the practitioner:
Modesty can mean many things, including a sense
that the ‘Western’ way is not the only way, that the
you are a guest in that community, and how achievements of richer countries are not necessarily
you relate to individuals and groups will be replicable or even desirable in poor countries, that
likely to affect the responses you receive and can Western science and techniques are not always
ultimately determine the success of your entire value-neutral, and that there are other narratives
research project. Above all, you should respect to explain reality and to change it in a pro-people
local customs and make a determined effort to way. Development agencies and practitioners should
be unobtrusive, polite, and deferential. At the not assume they can solve local problems from the
end of your fieldwork you should report back outside when solutions exist at the local level, which
on your findings to the community, explaining is frequently the case. This growing self-critical
how you intend to follow up the fieldwork after attitude among contemporary researchers and
you have left. (Binns, 2006: 20) practitioners in what we may term the post-naive era
of development represents a welcome break from the
Nonetheless, some development practitioners simplistic interpretations of the past.
earn the derisory moniker development tourists as In lieu of conclusion, we may ask future development
they jet in and out of poor countries dispensing practitioners and researchers to reflect upon the words
advice with little understanding of local conditions of Mahatma Ghandi: ‘Recall the face of the poorest and
(Adams and Megaw, 1997, citing Chambers, 1997a). the weakest man whom you may have seen, and ask
The generous per diems received by UN and national yourself if the step you contemplate is going to be of
development ‘experts’ that compensate them for all any use to him. Will he gain anything by it? Will it
the foreseeable risks and inconveniences of visiting restore him to a control over his own life and destiny?
a developing country are viewed by many as morally In other words, will it lead to Swaraj [self-rule] for the
objectionable when contrasted with the poverty hungry and spiritually starving millions?’ (Kerala,
outside the consultant’s five-star hotel (Gasper, 2003: 12).
1999: 20).
SUMMARY
In this chapter we have considered important concepts into the Human Development Index. We also explored
and ideas in the study of international development. We the ethics and morality of international development,
began by discussing the birth, evolution, and implications and looked at various arguments for and against global
of the term ‘development’ and related nomenclature redistributive justice by asking whether development
used by academics, practitioners, and international assistance should be considered a moral obligation for
organizations, such as ‘developing countries’, ‘Third rich countries and their citizens, or little more than an
World’, and ‘Global South’, We then turned to a critical individual choice akin to a charitable donation. The
examination of growth, inequality, and absolute and chapter concluded by introducing the personal ethical
moderate poverty. This led to discussion of ‘development’ dilemmas experienced by development practitioners and
as a contested concept. Multi-dimensional approaches researchers, including the need to be attentive to power
to development were considered in detail, articularly and positionality, as well as local norms of ethical and
Amartya Sen’s capabilities approach and its translation culturally sensitive behaviour.
SUGGESTED READING
Allen, Tim, and Alan Thomas, eds. 2000. Poverty and Development into the 21st Century. Oxford: Oxford University
Press and The Open University.
Bell, Daniel A., and Jean-Marc Coicaud, eds. 2007. Ethics in Action: The Ethical Challenges of International Human
Rights Nongovernmental Organizations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Desai, Vandana, and Robert B. Potter, eds. 2006. Doing Development Research. London: Sage.
Gasper, Des. 2006. ‘Introduction: Working in Development Ethics—A Tribute to Denis Goulet’, Ethics and Economics
4, 2: 1–24.
Mohan, Giles. 2007. ‘Developing Differences: Post-Structuralism and Political Economy in Contemporary
Development Studies’, Review of African Political Economy 73: 311–28.
Sachs, Jeffrey D. 2005. The End of Poverty: Economic Possibilities for Our Time. New York: Penguin.
Todaro, Michael P., and Stephen C. Smith. 2006. Economic Development in the Third World, 9th edn. Boston:
Addison Wesley.
RELATED WEBSITES
World Bank country classification
www.worldbank.org/data/countryclass/classgroups.htm
World Bank’s World Development Report
www.worldbank.org/wdr
United Nations Development Program’s Human Development Report
hdr.undp.org
United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD)
www.unctad.org
International Development Ethics Association
www.development-ethics.org
NOTES
1. Gross domestic product is a measure of the market production, than is GNP/GNI, which better reflects
value, in monetary terms, of all goods and services national wealth.
produced within a country over a specific time period 2. The Gini coefficient is based on the Lorenz curve,
(usually a year, hence, annual GDP). Gross national which plots the proportion of national income
product and gross national income are measures that accruing to each segment of the population. The Gini
include GDP plus net income from abroad, such as coefficient is a ratio of the area between the curve and
investments. Thus, GDP is a better measure of the a line representing total equality to the total area under
activity of a national economy, that is, of domestic the line of equality.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Adams, W.M. 1995. ‘Green development theory? fight against poverty’, Policy Research Working Paper
Environmentalism and sustainable development’, in No. 4703. Washington: World Bank.
J. Crush, ed., Power of Development. London and New Cowen, M., and R.W. Shenton. 1995. ‘The invention of
York: Routledge, 87–99. development’, in J. Crush, ed., Power of Development.
———. and C.C. Megaw. 1997. ‘Researchers and the rural London and New York: Routledge, 27–43.
poor: Asking questions in the Third World’, Journal of ———. and ———. 1996. Doctrines of Development.
Geography in Higher Education 21, 2: 215–29. London and New York: Routledge.
Apentiik, C.R.A., and J.L. Parpart. 2006. ‘Working in Crush, J. 1995. ‘Introduction: Imagining development’, in
different cultures: Issues of race, ethnicity and identity’, J. Crush, ed., Power of Development. London and New
in Desai and Potter (2006: 34–43). York: Routledge, 1–23.
Binns, T. 2006. ‘Doing fieldwork in developing countries: Desai, V., and R.B. Potter, eds. 2006. Doing Development
Planning and logistics’, in Desai and Potter (2006: 13–24). Research. London: Sage.
Brydon, L. 2006. ‘Ethical practices in doing development Doyle, Michael W. 2006. ‘One world, many peoples:
research’, in Desai and Potter (2006: 25–33). International justice in John Rawls’s The Law of Peoples’,
Canadian Council for International Cooperation (CCIC). Perspectives on Politics 4, 1: 109–20.
2004. Code of Ethics. At: www. ccic.ca/e/docs/002_ Escobar, Arturo. 1992. ‘Reflections on “development”’,
ethics_code.pdf. Futures 24, 5: 411–36.
Chambers, R. 1997. ‘Responsible well-being: A personal Esping-Andersen, Gøsta. 1990. The Three Worlds of Welfare
agenda for development’, World Development 25, 11: Capitalism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
1743–54. Forbes. 2010. ‘Special report: The world’s billionaires’. At:
Chen, S., and M. Ravallion. 2009. ‘The developing world www.forbes.com/lists/2010/10/billionaires-2010_The-
is poorer than we thought, but no less successful in the Worlds-Billionaires_Rank.html. (6 Mar. 2011)
Fry, G., and G.R. Martin, eds. 1991. The International et de recherches internationales (CERI) Working
Development Dictionary. Santa Barbara, Calif.: ABC-CLIO. Paper, 25 fév., Université de SciencesPo, Paris. At:
Fukuyama, F. 1995. Trust: The Social Virtues and the www.ceri-sciences-po.org/ cherlist/pouligny/huma.
Creation of Prosperity. New York: Free Press. pdf.
Fuller, B. 1991. Growing Up Modern: The Western State Putnam, R.D. 1993. Making Democracy Work. Princeton,
Builds Third World Schools. New York and London: NJ: Princeton University Press.
Routledge. Rist, G. 1997. The History of Development: From Western
G8. 2000. Global Poverty Report. Okinawa Summit, Origins to Global Faith. London: Zed Books.
July. At: www.worldbank.org/html/ extdr/extme/G8_ ———. 2007. ‘Development as a buzzword’, Development
poverty2000.pdf. in Practice 17, 4 and 5: 485–91.
Gasper, Des. 1986. ‘Distribution and development ethics: Rodney, Walter. 1972. How Europe Underdeveloped Africa.
A tour’, in R. Apthorpe and A. Krahl, eds, Development London: Bogle-L’Ouverture Publications.
Studies: Critique and Renewal. Leiden, Netherlands: Sachs, Jeffrey D. 2005. The End of Poverty: Economic
E.J. Brill, 136–203. Possibilities for Our Time. New York: Penguin.
———. 1999. ‘Ethics and the conduct of international Sachs, Wolfgang. 1993. The Development Dictionary.
development aid: Charity and obligation’, Institute of London: Zed Books.
Social Studies Working Paper Series no. 297. The Hague: Scott, J.C. 1990. Dominations and the Arts of Resistance.
Institute of Social Studies. New Haven: Yale University Press.
———. 2005. ‘Beyond the international relations Seers, D. 1972. ‘What are we trying to measure?’, Journal
framework: An essay in descriptive global ethics’, of Development Studies 8, 3: 21–36.
Journal of Global Ethics 1, 1: 5–23. ———. 1979. ‘The meaning of development, with a
Goulet, Denis. 1971. The Cruel Choice: A New Concept in postscript’, in D. Lehmann, ed., Development Theory:
the Theory of Development. New York: Atheneum. Four Critical Studies. London: Frank Cass, 9–30.
Inaugural Addresses of the Presidents of the United States. Sen, Amartya. 1999. Development as Freedom. New York:
1989. Washington: US Government Printing Office. Anchor Books.
At: www.bartleby.com/124. (11 June 2007) SIL International. 2009. ‘Ethnologue: Languages of the
Jacobsen, K., and L.B. Landau. 2003. ‘The dual imperative world’. At: www.ethnologue.com/. (13 Aug. 2010)
in refugee research: Some methodological and ethical Singer, Peter. 2002. One World: The Ethics of Globalization.
considerations in social science research on forced New Haven: Yale University Press.
migration’, Disasters 27, 3: 195–206. Thomas, A. 2000. ‘Poverty and the “end of development”’,
Jones, Charles. 1999. Global Justice: Defending in T. Allen and A. Thomas, eds, Poverty and Development
Cosmopolitanism. Oxford: Oxford University Press. into the 21st Century. Oxford: Oxford University Press
Kerala. 2003. ‘India marches ahead . . . Kerala calling’ (Aug.): and The Open University, 3–22.
12. At: www.kerala.gov.in/kerala_ callingaug/p12-13.pdf. Titmuss, Richard. 1963. Essays on the Welfare State, 2nd
Klitgaard, R. 1991. Tropical Gangsters. London: I.B. Taurus. edn. London: Allen and Unwin.
Leys, C. 1996. The Rise and Fall of Development Theory. ———. 1968. Commitment to Welfare. London: Allen and
Oxford: James Currey. Unwin.
Marchall, P.A. 1992. ‘Research ethics in applied Todaro, M.P. 1989. Economic Development in the Third
anthropology’, IRB: A Review of Human Subjects World, 4th edn. New York: Longman.
Research 14, 6: 1–5. United Nations Development Programme (UNDP). 1990.
Miller, Richard. 1998. ‘Cosmopolitan respect and patriotic Human Development Report 1990: Concept and
concern’, Philosophy and Public Affairs 27, 3: 202–24. Measurement of Human Development. Geneva: United
Nozick, Robert. 1974. Anarchy, State and Utopia. Oxford: Nations. At: hdr.undp.org/reports/ global/ 1990/en.
Blackwell. United Nations General Assembly. 2005. Resolution
O’Neill, Onora. 2000. ‘Bounded and cosmopolitan justice’, adopted at the outcome of the World Summit. At:
Review of International Studies 26, 5: 45–60. daccessdds.un.org/ doc/UNDOC/GEN/N05/487/60/
Pink, S. 1998. ‘The white “helpers”: Anthropologists, PDF/N0548760. pdf?OpenElement.
development workers and local imaginations’, Watts, M. 1995. ‘“A New Deal in emotions”: Theory and
Anthropology Today 14, 6: 9–16. practice and the crisis of development’, in J. Crush,
Pogge, Thomas. 2002. World Poverty and Human Rights: ed., Power of Development. London and New York:
Cosmopolitan Responsibilities and Reforms. Cambridge: Routledge, 44–62.
Polity Press. Wood, G.D. 1985. ‘The politics of development
———. 2005. ‘World poverty and human rights’, Ethics policy labelling’, in G.D. Wood, ed., Labelling in
and International Affairs 19, 1: 1–7. Development Policy: Essays in Honour of Bernard
Pouligny, B. 2001. ‘L’humanitaire non gouvernemental Schaffer. London: Sage; The Hague: Institute of Social
face a la guerre: Évolutions et enjeux’, Centre d’études Studies, 5–31.