CSE 3013 is an artificial intelligence course. AI is an interdisciplinary field that builds intelligent machines through techniques like natural language processing, knowledge representation, automated reasoning, and machine learning. The goal is to not just understand human intelligence but also to build intelligent systems. There are different approaches to defining and achieving AI like mimicking human behavior, understanding human cognition, or developing rational agents.
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0 ratings0% found this document useful (0 votes)
103 views17 pages
Artificial Intelligence
CSE 3013 is an artificial intelligence course. AI is an interdisciplinary field that builds intelligent machines through techniques like natural language processing, knowledge representation, automated reasoning, and machine learning. The goal is to not just understand human intelligence but also to build intelligent systems. There are different approaches to defining and achieving AI like mimicking human behavior, understanding human cognition, or developing rational agents.
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 17
CSE 3013:
Artificial Intelligence 1
B1 SLOT Artificial Intelligence 25
Homo sapiens-man the wise - our mental capacities
are so important to us. Tried to understand how we think; that is, how a mere handful of stuff can perceive, understand, predict, arid manipulate a world far larger and more complicated than itself. The field of artificial intelligence, or AI, goes further still: it attempts not just to understand but also to build intelligent entities. AI is one of the newest sciences. What is AI? 26
• No clear consensus on the definition of AI
• John McCarthy coined the phrase AI in 1956 http://www.formal.stanford.edu/jmc/whatisai/whatisai. html Q. What is artificial intelligence? A. It is the science and engineering of making intelligent machines, especially intelligent computer programs. It is related to the similar task of using computers to understand human or other intelligence, but AI does not have to confine itself to methods that are biologically observable. 27
• AI is a collection of hard problems which can be
solved by humans and other living things, but for which we don’t have good algorithms for solving. – e. g., understanding spoken natural language, medical diagnosis, circuit design, learning, self-adaptation, reasoning, chess playing, proving math theories, etc. Russsell & Norvig: a program that – Acts like human (Turing test)
– Thinks like human (patterns of thinking steps)
– Acts or thinks rationally (logically, correctly)
AI currently encompasses a huge variety of subfields, ranging from general purpose areas, such as learning and perception to such specific tasks as playing chess, proving mathematical theorems, writing poetry, and diagnosing diseases. AI systematizes and automates intellectual tasks and is therefore potentially relevant to any sphere of human intellectual activity. Definitions of artificial intelligence according to eight textbooks are shown in Figure 1.1. These definitions vary along two main dimensions. Roughly, the ones on top are concerned with thought processes and reasoning, whereas the ones on the bottom address behavior. The definitions on the left measure success in terms of fidelity to human performance, whereas the ones on the right measure against an ideal concept of intelligence, which we will call rationality. A system is rational if it does the "right thing," given what it knows Historically, all four approaches to AI have been followed. As one might expect, a tension exists between approaches centered around humans and approaches centered around rationality.' A human-centered approach must be an empirical science, involving hypothesis and experimental confirmation. A rationalist approach involves a combination of mathematics and engineering Imitation Game / Turing test 34
Uses the "Imitation Game"
Usual method Three people play (man, woman, and interrogator) Interrogator determines which of the other two is a woman by asking questions Example: How long is your hair? Questions and responses are typewritten or repeated by an intermediary Acting humanly: The Turing Test approach
The Turing Test, proposed by Alan Turing (195O), was
designed to provide a satisfactory operational definition of intelligence.
he suggested a test based on indistinguishability from
undeniably intelligent entities-human beings. The computer passes the test if a human interrogator, after posing some written questions, cannot tell whether the written responses come from a person or not. Computer Capabilities
The computer would need to possess the following
capabilities: Natural language processing to enable it to communicate successfully in English. Knowledge representation to store what it knows or hears; Automated reasoning to use the stored information to answer questions and to draw new conclusions; Machine learning to adapt to new circumstances and to detect and extrapolate patterns. Total Turing test
Turing's test deliberately avoided direct physical interaction
between the interrogator and the computer, because physical simulation of a person is unnecessary for intelligence. However, the so-called total Turing Test includes a video signal so that the interrogator can test the subject's perceptual abilities, as well as the opportunity for the interrogator to pass physical objects "through the hatch." To pass the total Turing Test, the computer will need Computer vision to perceive objects, and Robotics to manipulate objects and move about. These six disciplines compose most of AI, and Turing deserves credit for designing a test that remains relevant 50 years later. Thinking humanly: The cognitive modeling approach
If we are going to say that a given program thinks like a
human, we must have some way of determining how humans think. We need to get inside the actual workings of human minds. There are two ways to do this: through introspection trying to catch our own thoughts as they go by-and through psychological experiments. The interdisciplinary field of cognitive science brings together computer models from A1 and experimental techniques from psychology to try to construct precise and testable theories of the workings of the human mind. Thinking rationally: The "laws of thought" approach
The Greek philosopher Aristotle was one of the first
to attempt to codify "right thinking," that is, irrefutable reasoning processes. His syllogisms provided patterns for argument structures that always yielded correct conclusions when given correct premises-for example, "Socrates is a man; all men are mortal; therefore, Socrates is mortal." These laws of thought were supposed to govern the operation of the mind; their study initiated the field called logic. By 1965, programs existed that could, in principle, solve any solvable problem described in logical notation. The so-called logicist tradition within artificial intelligence hopes to build on such programs to create intelligent systems. There are two main obstacles to this approach. First, it is not easy to take informal knowledge and state it in the formal terms required by logical notation, particularly when the knowledge is less than 100% certain. Second, there is a big difference between being able to solve a problem "in principle" and doing so in practice Acting rationally: The rational agent approach
An agent is just something that acts
But computer agents are expected to have other attributes that distinguish them from mere "programs," such as operating under autonomous control, perceiving their environment, persisting over a prolonged time period, adapting to change, and being capable of taking on another's goals. A rational agent is one that acts so as to achieve the best outcome or, when there is uncertainty, the best expected outcome. The study of AI as rational-agent design has at least two advantages. First, it is more general than the "laws of thought" approach, because correct inference is just one of several possible mechanisms for achieving rationality. Second, it is more amenable to scientific development than are approaches based on human behavior or human thought be- cause the standard of rationality is clearly defined and completely general. Human behavior, on the other hand, is well-adapted for one specific environment and is the product, in part, of a complicated and largely unknown evolutionary process that still is far from producing perfection.