Effect of Annealing Temperature On The Microstructure, Microhardness, Mechanical Behavior and Impact Toughness of Low Carbon Steel Grade 45
Effect of Annealing Temperature On The Microstructure, Microhardness, Mechanical Behavior and Impact Toughness of Low Carbon Steel Grade 45
Effect of Annealing Temperature On The Microstructure, Microhardness, Mechanical Behavior and Impact Toughness of Low Carbon Steel Grade 45
ABSTRACT
Due to the high usage of low carbon steel in Annealing is heat treatment of steel by heating the steel
multiplications, previous work was focused toward to a temperature above hypoeutectoid SLT (Upper
its mechanical characteristics, this work rely on Critical Temperature). Steel is heated to approximately
studying the effect of multi-régimes of annealing 100F on the SLT program. Then cooled in the furnace
temperatures namely; 820,860, 900, and 940 ˚C on very slowly to room temperature. Formation of
the impact toughness, microstructure, austenite to destroy all existing structures prior to
microhardness and mechanical characteristics. A set heating. Slow cooling produces original phases of
of test specimens for impact, compression test, and ferrite and pearlite Hypereutectoid steel consists of
microstructure test were prepared using CNC pearlite and cementite. Cementite is fragile tissue
machine. It was found that the impact energy is around the pearlite. To improve the machinability of
increased as the annealing temperature increase; the steel annealing hypereutectoid spheroidize applied.
maximum is 22.5 % that achieved at 820˚C. it was This process will produce a round shape or a ball of
found that the microhardness decrease as the carbide in the ferritic matrix which makes the machine
annealing temperature increase except at 940 ˚C it easy. At the high temperature will break perlitik
return back to increase, the maximum decrease was structure and cementite network, this structure is called
31.6 % that achieved at 900 ˚C. spheroidite. This structure is desirable for the violence
acquired a minimum, with maximum ductility and
Keywords : impact energy, microhardness, steel C45, maximum machinability. Low carbon steel
toughness. spheroidized rare for machines, because they are too
soft and sticky in spheoridized conditions. Cutting
1. Introduction tools will tend to push the material rather than cut,
Low carbon steel has carbon content of 0.45%. Low causing excessive heat and wear on the cutting edge.
carbon steel is the most common form of steel as it’s Stress-Relief Annealing sometimes called subcritical
provides material properties that are acceptable for annealing, useful to eliminate residual stress due to
many applications. It is neither externally brittle nor heavy machining or cold-employment benefits. This is
ductile due to its lower carbon content. It has lower usually done at temperatures below the LCT, which is
tensile strength and malleable. Steel with low carbon usually chosen around 1000F. Benefits annealing are
steel has properties similar to iron. As the carbon Improve the ductility, Remove residual stresses that
content increases, the metal becomes harder and result from cold-working or machine and Improve
stronger but less ductile and more difficult to weld. The machinability. And several test we don on this project
process heat treatment is carried out first by heating the which are impact test, microstructure test and
metal and then cooling it in water, oil and brine water. hardening test. In literature it is possible to find many
The purpose of heat treatment is to soften the metal, to works regarding the quenching heat treatment with
change the grain size, to modify the structure of the very encouraging results [1–3]. Current processes
material and relive the stress set up in the material. The leading to carbide spheroidisation rely on diffusion of
various heat treatment processes are annealing, carbon in a workpiece heated to a temperature close to
normalizing, hardening, tempering, and surface or slightly below Ac1 [4]. During annealing, softening
hardening. Annealing to improve ductility and processes are under way in the microstructure and, in
toughness, to reduce hardness and to remove Carbides. some cases, recovery and recrystallization take place as
well. Naturally, the morphology of carbides changes as
well [5].
1550 | P a g e
S.M.A. Al-Qawabah, Nabeel Alshabatat, U.F. Al-Qawabeha / International Journal of Engineering
Research and Applications (IJERA) ISSN: 2248-9622 www.ijera.com
Vol. 2, Issue 3, May-Jun 2012, pp.1550-1553
The purpose of impact testing is to measure an object's Table 1. Temperatures and holding times for annealing
ability to resist high-rate loading. It is usually thought process.
of in terms of two objects striking each other at high
relative speeds. A part or material's ability to resist Carbon steel C45 Annealing Holding time
impact often is one of the determining factors in the Temperature (min)
service life of a part, or in the suitability of a (˚C)
designated material for a particular application. Impact A 820 27
resistance can be one of the most difficult properties to B 860 30
quantify. The ability to quantify this property is a great C 900 33
advantage in product liability and safety. The Charpy D 940 36
tests are conducted on instrumented machines capable
of measuring less than 1ft.lb. To 300ft. lbs. at The annealing regimes are shown in Fig. 1.
temperatures ranging from 320° F to over 2000°F.
Specimen types include notch configurations such as
V-Notch, U-Notch, Key-Hole Notch, as well as Un-
notched and ISO (DIN) V-Notch, with capabilities of
testing subsize specimens down to 1/4 size. IZOD
testing can be done up to 240ft.lbs. On standard single
notch and type-X3 specimens [5].
Microhardness Hv
166
microstructure test using microscope type (Nikon 208)
145
at 200x manufacturing using (98% alcohol ethanol +2% 150
nitric acid) as etching solution.
2.2.5 Hardening test 100
A digital microhardness tester model HWDM-3 is
used to investigate the hardness of low carbon steel 50
specimens at 300 gmf load; five readings were taken
from which the average was determined.
0
3. Result and Discussion
3.1 Effect of annealing temperature on the O-Before A-820ْ C B-860ْ C C-900ْ C D-940ْ C
microstructure of low carbon steel C45 Annealing Temperature C
It can be seen from Fig.2 that the grain size becomes
larger as the annealing temperature increase this due to Fig.3: Effect of annealing temperature on the
lower cooling rate. This will resulted in changing the microhardness of low carbon steel C45.
mechanical characteristics of low carbon steel grade
C45 according to hall-pitch equation. 3.3 Effect of upsetting process on the microhardness of
low carbon steel C45
It obviously clear from Fig.4 that the microhardness
affected by the plastic deformation, the microhardness
increased after upsetting process the maximum is 75 %
that attained after 860 ˚C annealed temperature.
239
250
212 212 206
192 193
200 166
145
150
100
50
0
O-Before A-820ْ C B-860ْ C C-900ْ C D-940ْ C
Annealing Temperature C
Fig.2: Photomicroscan of carbon steel C45 before and
after annealing at 200x.
Fig.4: Effect of upsetting process on the microhardness
3.2 Effect of annealing temperature on the of low carbon steel C45 and its regimes.
microhardness of low carbon steel C45
3.4 Effect of annealing temperature on the mechanical
From the histogram of Fig. 3 it can be seen that the behavior of low carbon steel C45
microhardness decrease as the annealing temperature
increase except at 940 ˚C it return back to increase, the It can be seen from Fig.5 that as the annealing
maximum decrease was 31.6 % that achieved at 900 ˚C. temperature increase to 900 ˚C the mechanical behavior
This can be attributed to the coarse grains as shown in decrease, but at 940 ˚C the mechanical characteristics
Fig.2. enhanced, this finding is consistent with the
microhardness results.
1552 | P a g e
S.M.A. Al-Qawabah, Nabeel Alshabatat, U.F. Al-Qawabeha / International Journal of Engineering
Research and Applications (IJERA) ISSN: 2248-9622 www.ijera.com
Vol. 2, Issue 3, May-Jun 2012, pp.1550-1553
800 4. Conclusions
A-820 The following points can be concluded:
700
B-860
600
C-900 1- The impact toughness in general increase as
D-940 the annealing temperature increase, the
maximum is 22.5 % that achieved at 820˚C.
True stress MPa
500 O-Before
400
2- Microhardness is increased after upsetting
300
process the maximum is 75 % that attained at
860 ˚C.
200
3- The microhardness decrease as the annealing
100
temperature increases except at 940 ˚C it
0
returns back to increase, the maximum
decrease was 31.6 % that achieved at 900 ˚C.
02
05
13
19
29
41
53
66
8
08
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
30
Method Heat Fluid Flow 9 (6) (1999) 705–
25 724,MCB University press.
20
1553 | P a g e