Learning Styles and Teaching Styles in College English Teaching
Learning Styles and Teaching Styles in College English Teaching
Learning Styles and Teaching Styles in College English Teaching
1; February 2011
interact with and respond to the learning environment (Keefe, 1—87). Students learn differently from each other
(Price, 1977). Talmadge and Shearer (1969) have determined that learning styles do exist. Their study shows that the
characteristics of the “content of a learning experience are a critical factor affecting relationships that exist between
learner characteristics and instructional methods. Reiff (1992) claims that styles influence how students learn, how
teachers teach, and how they interact. Each person is born with certain preferences toward particular styles, but these
preferences are influenced by culture, experience and development.
2.2 The classification of learning styles
A learning style is multidimensional (Kinsella, 1996). Its elements can be classified into five stimulus categories:
environmental elements (sound, light, temperatures, design), emotional elements (motivation, persistence,
responsibility), physical elements (perception, intake, time, mobility), sociological elements (self, partner, team,
mentor, varied), and psychological elements (global/analytical, impulsive/reflective) (Reiff. 1992). Clearly, learning
styles include not only the cognitive domain, but also the affective and physiological domains (Oxford, Hollaway.
Horton-Murillo, 1992).
Generally speaking, the learning-styles can be divided into three major categories: cognitive learning styles, sensory
learning styles, and personality learning styles. Cognitive learning styles include field-independent/field-dependent
learning styles, analytic/global learning styles, reflective/impulsive learning styles and Kolb experiential learning
model. Sensory learning styles also fall into the following four sub-styles: auditory learners, visual learners, tactile
learners and kinesthetic learners. Temperament learning styles include Myers-Briggs temperament styles, tolerance
of ambiguity styles, right-and left-hemisphere learners.
2.3 Factors related to learning styles
Research into learning styles have moved through stages of evolutionary development. The first wave of research
was conducted in Sweden using qualitative methods with small samples (Marion &saljo,1976). From these early
beginnings, subsequent researchers developed learning style inventories. Learning style inventories use self-report
instruments that are distributed on mass to students to establish their learning styles. The use of inventories in
establishing learning styles of large groups of students signaled a shift from qualitative to quantitative research
methods. Essentially the shift to qualitative methods allowed researchers to perform data reductions and statistical
examinations of larger sample sets with the view of advancing knowledge. Regardless of methodological approach,
these studies have collectively revealed that learning styles have an impact on learning outcomes, furthermore
background characteristics, such as age, gender, personality, hemispheric dominance, educational background are
known to have an impact on learning style. In order to improve the quality of learning outcomes, it would be
appropriate for educators to devise specific strategies in an effort to enhance learning outcomes for students with
different characteristics.
2.4 Learning styles and learning strategies
The term language learning strategy has been defined by many researchers. Wenden and Rubin (1987:19) define
learning strategies as “... any sets of operations, steps, plans, routines used by the learner to facilitate the obtaining,
storage, retrieval , and use of information,” Richards and Piatt (1992: 209) state that learning strategies are
“intentional behavior and thoughts used by learners during learning so as to better help them understand, learn, or
remember new information, Faerch Claus and Casper (1983:67) stress that a learning strategy is “an attempt to
develop linguistic and sociolinguistic competence in the target language.” According to Stern (1992: 261), “the
concept of learning strategy is dependent on the assumption that learners consciously engage in activities to achieve
certain goals and learning strategies can be regarded as broadly conceived intentional directions and learning
techniques. All language learners use language learning strategies either consciously or unconsciously when
processing new information and performing tasks in the language classroom. Since language classroom is like a
problem-solving environment in which language learners are likely to face new input and difficult tasks given by
their instructors, learners’ attempts to find the quickest or easiest way to do what is required, that is, using language
learning strategies is inescapable. In short, learning strategy is an external skill that learners use, often consciously,
to improve their learning.
3. Teaching College English according to students’ learning styles
3.1 Lesson planning in accordance with learning styles
In all academic classrooms, no matter what the subject matter is, there will be students with multiple learning styles
and students with a variety of major, minor and negative learning styles. An effective means of accommodating
these learning styles is for teachers to change their own styles and strategies and provide a variety of activities to
meet the needs of different learning styles. Then all students will have at least some activities that appeal to them
based on their learning styles, and they are more likely to be successful in these activities, Hinkelman and Pysock
(1992), for example, have demonstrated the effectiveness of a multimedia methodology for vocabulary building with
Japanese students. This approach is effective in tapping a variety of learning modalities. By consciously
accommodating a range of learning styles in the classroom in this way, it is possible to encourage most students to
become successful language learners.
3.2 Altering teaching style to create teacher-student style matching
The prospect of altering language instruction to somehow accommodate different learning styles might seem
forbidding to teachers. This reaction is understandable, Teaching styles are made up of methods and approaches with
which teachers feel most comfortable; if they try to change to completely different approaches, they would be forced
to work entirely with unfamiliar, awkward, and uncomfortable methods. Fortunately, teachers who wish to address a
wide variety of learning styles need not make drastic changes in their instructional approach, Regular use of some of
the instructional techniques given below should suffice to cover some specified learning style categories.
1) Make liberal use of visuals. Use photographs, drawings, sketches, and cartoons to illustrate and reinforce the
meanings of vocabulary words. Show films, videotapes, and live dramatizations to illustrate lessons in text.
2) Assign some repetitive drill exercises to provide practice in basic vocabulary and grammar, but don’t overdo it.
3) Do not fill every minute of class time lecturing and writing on the blackboard. Provide intervals for students to
think about what they have been told; assign brief writing exercises.
4) Provide explicit instruction in syntax and semantics to facilitate formal language learning and develop skill in
written communication and interpretation.
3.3 Fostering guided style-stretching
Learning style is a consistent way of functioning which reflects cultural behavior patterns and, like other behaviors
influenced by cultural experiences, may be revised as a result of training or changes in learning experiences. The
following are examples of teaching activities that guide students to alter their learning behaviors, stretch their
learning styles and enable them to improve their language performance.
1) Groups of four or five learners are given cards, each with a word on it. Each person describes his word in the
foreign language to the others in the group without actually using it. When all students have described their words
successfully, the students take the first letter of each and see what new word the letters spell out. (Puzzle parts might
also depict objects in a room; in this case, when all the words have been guessed, the group decides which room of
the house has been described.)
2) Class members are placed in pairs or in larger groups. Each student has a blank piece of paper. He listens to his
partner or the group leader who has a picture to describe (the teacher can provide the picture or students can choose
their own). As his partner describes the picture, the student tries to draw a rough duplicate according to the
description he hears.
3.4 Providing activities with different grouping
In a class made up of students with various learning styles and strategies, it is always helpful for the teacher to
divide the students into groups by learning styles and give them activities based on their learning styles. This should
appeal to them because they will enjoy them and be successful. For example, the group made up of the extroverted
may need to express some ideas orally in the presence of one or many class members. On the other hand, the group
made up the introverted may need some encouragement to share aloud and may want the safety of jotting down a
few notes first and perhaps sharing with one other person before being invited or expected to participate in a group
discussion.
No matter how students are to be grouped, teachers should make a conscious effort to include various learning styles
in daily lesson plan. One simple way to do this is to code the lesson plans so that a quick look at the completed plan
shows if different learning styles have been included. Putting “A” or “V” beside activities that denote whether they
are primarily appealing to the analytic learner or the visual learner will serve as a reminder that there is a need for
mixture of both kind of activities. Meanwhile, simply designating various parts of the lesson plan with letters (I for
individual, P for pair, SC for small group, LG for large group) and other symbols reminds the teacher to pay
attention to learning styles. If the coding system is used on a regular basis, it becomes very natural to think in terms
of providing the setting and the activities by which all learners can find some portion of the class that particularly
appeals to them.
3.5 Consideration of college English learners
An overwhelming majority of college students are adults, and they have their own characteristics. Adult learners are
self-directed and independent, and they are able to draw on a reservoir of accumulated experience as a rich resource
in learning, are aware of their learning needs and want to apply skills and knowledge to real-life problems and tasks.
Their previous learning experience does have impact on their learning styles. Students usually make contrasts and
comparisons between their former English teachers’ teaching practice and the new one’s. Even if the new one’s
teaching is more reasonable and appealing, their former teacher’s teaching impact still lasts. In China, college
students have no or little real-life experience, therefore, they don’t have a clear picture of their needs required by
their future career. English teachers are expected to inform their students of what to learn and the language
requirements by the society.
3.6 Teaching techniques involved in learning styles
Traditionally, the teaching of EFL in China is dominated by a teacher-centered, book-centered, grammar-translation
method and an emphasis on mechanical memory. These traditional language teaching approaches have resulted in a
number of typical learning styles, with visual learning being one of them. A teacher must design her lesson plan
around her students. After you know the students learning styles, you should set goals for your teaching strategies.
This requires you to differentiate instruction through use of the learning styles. Ideally you want to incorporate all of
the learning styles so that each student may learn in a way that suits them best for the day.
Studies show that matching teaching styles to learning styles can significantly enhance academic achievements,
student attitude and student behavior at the college level. This is not to say that the best thing one can do for one’s
students is to use their preferred modes of instructions exclusively. A point no educational psychologist would
dispute is that students learn more when information is presented in a variety of modes than when only a single
mode is used. The point is supported by a research study carried out several decades ago, which concluded that
students retain 10% of what they read, 26% of what they hear, 30% of what they see, 50% of what they see and hear,
70% of what they say and 90% of what they say as they do something (Stice,1987). The following are some
techniques employed in my teaching practice:
1) Provide a balance of concrete information (data, facts, experiments and results) and abstract concepts (principles,
theories).
2) Balance material that emphasizes practical problem-solving methods with material that emphasizes fundamental
understanding.
3) Use pictures, graphs and simple sketches liberally, during and after the presentation of verbal material. Show
films or provide demonstrations, if possible.
iv. Don’t fill every minute of class time lecturing and writing on the blackboard. Set aside intervals—however
brief—for students to learn what have been told on their own. Raise questions and problems to be worked on by
students in a small group,
5) Talk to students about learning styles, both in advising and in class. Students are reassured to find their academic
difficulties may not all be due to personal inadequacies. Explaining to students how they learn most efficiently may
be an important step in helping them reshape their learning experiences so that they can be successful.
6) Try to design some activities which involve students, senses as many as possible, using all the senses to help
improve English learning. For example, relatively long passage dictations, and games, which require students to
write down what they are told by their classmates, who already have learnt that by heart.
7) Encourage students to learn English online, such as, post writing assignments through e-mail, read materials
given online (the students in the experimental class use the new horizon college English book, a web-assisted
textbook).
8) Motivate learning. As much as possible, teach new material in the context of situation to which students can relate
in terms of their personal experiences, rather than simply as more material to memorize.
Teachers confronted with this list of techniques might feel that is impossible to do all that in the English Class and
still cover the syllabus and requirements. The idea, however, is not to adopt all the techniques at once but rather to
pick several that look feasible and try them on an occasional basis; and try one or two more later in class. In this way
a teaching style that is both effective for students and comfortable for teachers will evolve naturally, with a
potentially dramatic effect on the quality of learning.
4. Conclusion
Mismatching may be appropriate so that students’ experiences help them to learn in new ways and to bring into play
ways of thinking and aspects of the self not previously developed. Any mismatching. however, should be done with
sensitivity and consideration for students, because the experience of discontinuity can be very threatening,
particularly when students are weak in these areas. Knowledge of learning style can thus help faculty design
experiences appropriate for students in terms of matching or mismatching and enable them to do so thoughtfully and
systematically.
Learning a foreign language without guidance is similar to sailing without a good map. When teachers are aware of
the importance of learning styles, they can provide a good map to their students. It’s time for teachers to seek a
reasonable way to teach English so that students can swim in open seas.
References
Feng Zhiwei. (1999). Applied Linguistics Overview. Guangzhou: Guangdong Educational Press. pp.45-46.
Gui Shichun. (1992). Psychology of English Learners in China. Changsha: Hunan Educational Press. pp.21-30.
Reid . J. (2002). Learning styles in the ESL-EFL Classroom. Beijing: Foreign Language Teaching and Research
Press. pp. 81-84.
Stern, H. H. (1983). Fundamental Concepts of Language Teaching. London: Oxford University Press. pp13-14.