Book Recommendations From Nassim Taleb

15/07/2019 Book Recommendations from Nassim Taleb
Book Recommendations from Nassim Taleb

READING TIME: 39 MINUTES
15
Shares
(Jan 2017) Perilous Interventions: The Security Council and the Politics of Chaos
Solid Book on Interventionism, Should be Mandatory Reading in Foreign

Affairs. This is an outstanding book on the side effects of interventionism, written
in extremely elegant prose and with maximal clarity. It documents how people find
arguments couched in moralistic terms to intervene in complex systems they don’t
understand. These interventions trigger endless chains of unintended consequences
–consequences for the victims, but none for the interventionistas, allowing them to
repeat the mistake again and again. Puri, as an insider, outlines the principles and
legal mechanisms, then runs through the events of the past few years since the Iraq
invasion; each one of his chapters are models of concision, presenting the story of
Ukraine, Syria, Lybia, and Yemen, among others, as standalone briefings to the
uninitiated. It was high time that somebody in international affairs has approached
the problem of “iatrogenics”, i.e. harm done by the healer. This book should be
mandatory reading to every student and practitioner of foreign affairs.
https://fs.blog/2012/02/book-recommendations-from-nassim-taleb/ 1/33
(July 2016) Idea Makers: Personal Perspectives on the Lives & Ideas of Some Notable
People
The general public is usually supplied by books on mathematical scientists written

by “science communicators” and other outside observers–the worst by far being the
academic historians of science. Their books are like reviews of comparative squid
ink recipes written by anorexics, or descriptions of the Loire Valley by visually
impaired travel writers. They are well written, which masks the BS. The descriptions
15 focus on “interesting” traits of the personalities; scientists are discussed as if they
Shares
were partaking of spectator sports. This fellow “was the best…”, this fellow “was the
first to…”, “Einstein made a big blunder”, etc. This book, “Idea Makers”, is written
from an insider. It is the real thing on several accounts. Primo, Wolfram deserves to
be in the book as an “idea maker”, in his own right. Secondo, Wolfram is the
developer of a new way to do (useful) mathematics, an entirely new method, which
allows us to tinker with mathematics, something that is an anathema to purists.
Thus he depicts Ramanujan, not with the usual mathematical prism of the theorem
crowds, but as someone who, starting with intuitions, does experiments till a
mathematical identity feels right. As an eyewitness, I spent almost all my career in
quant finance and probability toying with Mathematica (Stephen Wolfram’s
invention), and saw it accumulate special functions and tools. Mathematica allowed
me to be a car mechanic who looked under the hood; such experience makes us look
at the pompous theoretician as a cook would a nerdy chemist. The book is about
this refreshing perspective: theorems were to Ramanujan a thing used by European
mathematicians to convince other European mathematicians. Terso, Wolfram is
fair. He shows a fair –even adulatory– portrait of Mandelbrot, in spite of attacks by
the latter. Indeed, if Mandelbrot hated someone, the person has to be good and
threatening. Otherwise he would not bother mentioning him. Finally, many of the
people involved are actually known either personally (Feynman, Mandelbrot,
Minsky), or like Boole, Ramanujan, Godel, and Lebnitz, “connect” to the author.
(April 2016) The Secret of Fatima (5 Stars)
Masterly! This is the page turner par excellence; every new page brings some
surprise and it was impossible for me to put the book down. I even read some of it
during elevator rides, not being able to resist. And truly sophisticated: Nobody but
Peter Tanous would have imagined to cross James Bond with a Catholic priest.”
(May 2015) Birth of a Theorem: A Mathematical Adventure (5 stars)
A gem: how to go from the abstract to the abstract in a playful way. There is no
book like it.
This book takes us through the formulation of the theorems in “On Landau
damping” by Clément Mouhot and Cédric Villani. Villani is playful in real life, his
research is playful, and the book is playful.
15
Shares
This is a gem for a singular reason. One sees exactly how Villani (or a pure
mathematician) goes from abstract to abstract without ever exiting the world of
pure and symbolic mathematics, even though the subject concerns a very concrete
real-world topic. I kept waiting for him to use simulations or even plots to see how
the equations worked. But he did not … he and Mouhot had recourse to outside help
(a student or an assistant) for the graphs and he camly noted that they “looked”
great. Later in the book he relied on others to do the numerical work… as an
afterthought. Most physicists, quants, and applied mathematicians would have
played with a computer to get the intuition; Villani just worked with mathematical
objects, abstract mathematical objects, and very abstract at that. And this is a big
deal for the subject because it belongs to a certain class of problems that do not
have analytic solutions, usually requiring numerical approaches.
Landau damping is about something many people are indirectly familiar with. Some
history: Fokker–Planck equation, itself the Kolmogorov forward equation, is used
commonly as the law of motion of particles (hence diffusions in finance). We
quants use it in the main partial stochastic differential equation. In plasma physics
it is related to the Boltzman equation, which, by using mean-interraction in place of
every interration (mean-field), leads to the Vlasov equation. Landau damping is
(sort of) about how things don’t blow up because of some exponential decay.
Proving it outside the linear version remained elusive. Villani and Mouhot set to
prove it. They eventually do.
One note. I read it in the English translation (because I was in a hurry to get the
book), but noticed an oddity that may confuse the reader. “Calcul” in French does
not mean “calculation” (in the sense of numerical calculation) but “derivation”, so
the reader might be confused about calculations thinking they were numerical when
Villani stayed at the abstract/symbolic level.
I would have read the book in one sitting. It grips you like a detective novel.
PS- Some UK BS operator, the type of journalist with an attempt at some PhD in
something related to physics who thinks he knows it all and is the representative of
the general public trashed the book in the Spectator. Ignore him: the fellow is
clueless. Look at reviews by PRACTICING quants and mathematicians. I do not
think there is another book like this one.
(November
15 2014) Modern Aramaic-English/English-Modern Aramaic Dictionary &
Shares
Phrasebook: Assyrian/Syriac (5 Stars)
There is no way we Levantines can learn the language of our ancestors in an organic
way except via nerds insisting on 1) grammar, 2) writing in one of the unwieldy
Syriac scripts that one cannot even read on a computer screen without dowloading
strange fonts. But Aramaic is still spoken, let us take advantage of it, and figure out
how to say “I want to eat mjaddara” rather than memorize poetry by some dead
author. Aramaic isn’t a dead language and it is the shame Levantines study Arabic
instead of our own heritage.
This book in the Latin alphabet makes both Swadaya and Turoyo alive and easy to
read, with all manner of real-world expressions. One can use it to supplement
scholarly studies, or just to figure out how modern people speak our ancient
language. There are Arabic influences, but the distance between the spoken
language and, say, Bar Hebraeus is quite narrow.
I would suggest the authors expand the dictionary. It would be the only one in the
latin script.
Most excellent, except for very few and small mistakes. “Debo” in Turoyo is not
wolf, but bear.
(April 2014) The Tyranny of Experts: Economists, Dictators, and the Forgotten Rights
of the Poor (5 Stars)
The point that top-down development methods are great on paper but have not
produced benefits (“so far”) is a point Easterly has made before, heavily influencing
yours truly in the formation his own argument against naive interventionism and
the collection of “humanitarians” fulfilling their personal growth and shielding
themselves from their conscience… This is more powerful: the West has been
putting development ahead of moral issues, patronizingly setting aside the right of
the people to decide their own fate, including whether they want these
“improvements”, hence compounding failure and turning much of development
into an agenda that benefits the careers (and angst) of “humanitarians”, imperial
policies, and, not least, local autocrats *without* any moral contribution. Talking
about a sucker problem.
15 ***
Shares
To put it in an aphorism, they didn’t ask the people if they would rather get respect
and no aid rather than aid and no respect.
(Jan 2014) Modelling Extremal Events: for Insurance and Finance (Stochastic
Modelling and Applied Probability) (5 stars “Indispensable”)
The mathematics of extreme events, or the remote parts of the probability

distributions, is a discipline on its own, more important than any other with respect
to risk and decisions since some domains are dominated by the extremes: for the
class of subexponential (and of course for the subclass of power laws) the tails ARE
the story.
Now this book is the bible for the field. It has been diligently updated. It is
complete, in the sense that there is nothing of relevance that is not mentioned,
treated, or referred to in the text. My business is hidden risk which starts where this
book stops, and I need the most complete text for that.
In spite of the momentous importance of the field, there is a very small number of
mathematicians who deal with tail events; of these there is a smaller group who go
both inside and outside the “Cramer conditions” (intuitively, thin-tailed or
exponential decline).
It is also a book that grows on you. I would have given it a 5 stars when I started
using it; today I give it 6 stars, and certainly 7 next year.
I am buying a second copy for the office. If I had to go on a desert island with 2
probability books, I would take Feller’s two volumes (written >40 years ago) and
this one.
One housecleaning detail: buy the hardcover, not the paperback as the ink quality is
weaker for the latter.
(Dec 1/2013) The Kelly Capital Growth Investment Criterion: Theory and Practice (5
Stars)
15 There are two methods to consider in a risky strategy.

Shares
1) The first is to know all parameters about the future and engage in optimized
portfolio construction, a lunacy unless one has a god-like knowledge of the future.
Let us call it Markowitz-style. In order to implement a full Markowitz- style
optimization, one needs to know the entire joint probability distribution of all
assets for the entire future, plus the exact utility function for wealth at all future
times. And without errors! (I have shown that estimation errors make the system
explode.)
2) Kelly’s method (or, rather, Kelly-Thorpe), developed around the same period,
which requires no joint distribution or utility function. It is very robust. In practice
one needs to estimate the ratio of expected profit to worst- case return–
dynamically adjusted to avoid ruin. In the case of barbell transformations, the worst
case is guaranteed (leave 80% or so of your money in reserves). And model error is
much, much milder under Kelly criterion. So, assuming one has the edge (as a sole
central piece of information), engage in a dynamic strategy of variable betting,
getting more conservative after losses (“cut your losses”) and more aggressive
“with the house’s money”. The entire focus is the avoidance of gambler’s ruin.
The first strategy was only embraced by academic financial economists –empty suits
without skin in the game — because you can make an academic career writing BS
papers with method 1 much better than with method 2. On the other hand EVERY
SURVIVING speculator uses explicitly or implicitly method 2 (evidence: Ray Dalio,
Paul Tudor Jones, Renaissance, even Goldman Sachs!) For the first method, think of
LTCM and the banking failure.
Let me repeat. Method 2 is much, much, much more scientific in the true sense of
the word, that is rigorous and applicable. Method 1 is good for “job market papers” .
Now this book presents all the major papers for the second line of thinking. It is
almost exhaustive; many great thinkers in Information theory and probability (Ed
Thorpe, Leo Breiman, T M Cover, Bill Ziemba) are represented… even the original
paper by Bernouilli.
Buy 2 copies, just in case you lose one. This book has more meat than any other
book in decision theory, economics, finance, etc…
(Sept
15 5/2013) A Few Lessons from Sherlock Holmes (5 Stars)
Shares
We Sherlock Holmes fans, readers, and secret imitators need a map. Here it is. Peter
Bevelin is one of the wisest people on the planet. He went through the books and
pulled out sections from Conan Doyle’s stories that are relevant to us moderns, a
guide to both wisdom and Sherlock Holmes. It makes you both wiser and eager to
reread Sherlock Holmes.
(Ed. I posted on Peter’s Book)
(Aug 31/2013) The Science of Conjecture: Evidence and Probability before Pascal (5
Stars)
Indispensable. As a practitioner of probability, I’ve read many book on the subject.

More are linear combinations of other books and ideas rehashed without real
understanding that the idea of probability harks back the Greek pisteuo (credibility)
and pervaded classical thought. Almost all of these writers made the mistake to
think that the ancients were not into probability. And most books such “Against the
Gods” are not even wrong about the notion of probability: odds on coin flips are a
mere footnote. If the ancients were not into computable probabilities, it was not
because of theology, but because they were not into games. They dealt with complex
decisions, not merely probability. And they were very sophisticated at it.
This book stands above, way above the rest: I’ve never seen a deeper exposition of
the subject, as this text covers, in addition to the mathematical bases, the true
philosophical origin of the notion of probability. In addition Franklin covers matters
related to ethics and contract law, such as the works of the medieval thinker Pierre
de Jean Olivi, that very few people discuss today.
Probability, Random Variables and Stochastic Processes (5 Stars)
When readers and students ask to me for a useable book for nonmathematicians to
get into probability (or a probabilistic approach to statistics), before embarking into
deeper problems, I suggest this book by the Late A. Papoulis. I even recommend it
to mathematicians as their training often tends to make them spend too much time
on limit theorems and very little on the actual “plumbing”.
15 The treatment has no measure theory, cuts to the chase, and can be used as a desk
Shares
reference. If you want measure theory, go spend some time reading Billingsley. A
deep understanding of measure theory is not necessary for scientific and
engineering applications; it is not necessary for those who do not want to work on
theorems and technical proofs.
I’ve notice a few complaints in the comments section by people who felt frustrated
by the treatment: do not pay attention to them. Ignore them. It the subject itself
that is difficult, not this book. The book, in fact, is admirable and comprehensive
given the current state of the art.
I am using this book as a benchmark while writing my own, but more advanced,
textbook (on errors in use of statistical models). Anything derived and presented in
Papoulis, I can skip. And when students ask me what they need as pre-requisite to
attend my class or read my book, my answer is: Papoulis if you are a scientist,
Varadhan if you are more abstract.
Mathematics: Its Content, Methods and Meaning (5 Stars)
There is something admirable about the school of the Russians: they are thinkers
doing math, with remarkable clarity, minimal formalism, and total absence of
unnecessary pedantry one finds in more modern texts (in the post Bourbaki era).
This is of course surprising as one would have expected the exact opposite from the
products of the communist era. Mathematicians should be using this book as a
model for their own composition. You can read it and reread it. Professors should
assign this in addition to modern texts, as readers can get intutions, something alas
absent from modern texts.
Probability Theory (Courant Lecture Notes) (5 Stars)

I know which books I value when I end up buying a second copy after losing the first
one. This book gives a complete overview of the basis of probability theory with
some grounding in measure theory, and presents the main proofs. It is remarkable
because of its concision and completeness: visibly prof Varadhan lectured from
these notes and kept improving on them until we got this gem. There is not a single
sentence too many, yet nothing is missing.
For those who don’t know who he is, Varadhan stands as one of the greatest
15 probabilists of all time. Learning probability from him is like learning from
Shares
Aristotle.
Varadhan has two other similar volumes one covering stochastic processes the
other into the theory of large deviations (though older than this current text). The
book on Stochastic Processes should be paired with this one.
Models.Behaving.Badly.: Why Confusing Illusion with Reality Can Lead to Disaster, on

Wall Street and in Life (5 Stars)
Here is what I wrote in my endorsement: Emanuel Derman has written my kind of a

book, an elegant combination of memoir, confession, and essay on ethics,
philosophy of science and professional practice. He convincingly establishes the
difference between model and theory and shows why attempts to model financial
markets can never be genuinely scientific. It vindicates those of us who hold that
financial modeling is neither practical nor scientific. Exceedingly readable.
From the remarks here, people seem to be blaming Derman for not having written
the type of books they usually read… They are blaming him for being original! This
is very philistinic. This book is a personal essay; if you don’t like it, don’t read it,
there is no need to blame the author for not delivering your regular science
reporting. Why don’t you go blame Montaigne for discussing his personal habits in
the middle of a meditation on war inspired by Plutarch?
Body by Science: A Research Based Program to Get the Results You Want in 12
Minutes a Week (5 Stars)
I feel guilty for not having posted a review earlier: I owe a lot to this book. I figured
out the value of intensity training and maximizing recovery. I use the ideas but with
minor modifications (my own personal workout is entirely based on free weights
and barbells, but I incur –and accept –a risk of injury). I have been applying the
ideas for more than three years. Just get over the inhibitions (and illusions of
control) and accept the idea of training less.
Gratitude.
The Hour Between Dog and Wolf: Risk Taking, Gut Feelings and the Biology of Boom
and Bust (5 Stars)
15
Shares
I read this book after completing my exposition of overcompensation, how a
stressor or a random event causes an increase in strength, in excess of what is
needed, like a redundancy. I was also looking for evidence of convex reaction to
stressor, or the effect of a mathematical property called Jensen’s inequality in
domains and found it exposed here (in other words, why a combination low dose
(most of the time) and high dose (rarely) beats medium dose all the time. The
authors presents the evidence for the phenomenon in the following: 1) acute
stressors cum recovery beat both absence of stressors and chronic ones; 2) stressors
make one stronger (post traumatic growth); 3) risk management is mediated by the
deep structures in us, not rational decision-making; 4) winning causes an increase
in strength (the latter are more complicated effects of convexity/Jensen’s
Inequality).
Great book. I ignored the connection to financial markets while reading it. But I
learned that when under stress, one should seek the familiar. Bravo!
The Opposing Shore (5 Stars)
Until I read this book, Buzzati’s “Il deserto dei tartari” was my favorite novel,
perhaps my only novel, the only one I cared to keep re-reading through life. This is,
remarkably a very similar story about the antichamber of anticipation (rather than
“the antichamber of hope” as I called Buzzati’s book), but written in a much finer
language, by a real writer (Buzzati was a journalist, which made his prose more
functional) ; the style is lapidary with remarkable precision; it has texture, wealth of
details, and creates a mesmerizing athmosphere. Once you enter it, you are stuck
there. I kept telling myself while reading it: “this is the book”. It suddenly replaced
the “deserto”.
A few caveats/comments. First, I read it in the original French Le Rivage des Syrtes
(French Edition), not in this English translation, but I doubt that the translator can
mess up such a fine style and the imagery. Second, the blurb says Gracq received the
Goncourt prize for it. Julien Gracq REFUSED the Goncourt, he despised the
Parisian literary circles and by 1951 decided to stay in the margin. He stuck to his
publisher José Corti rather than switch to the fancy Gallimard after his success (as
Proust did) (or other publishing houses for the fakes and the selfpromoters). Third,
this book came out a few years after Buzzati’s “deserto”, but before Buzzati was
15 translated into French. I wonder if Gracq had heard of the “deserto”; the
Shares
coincidence is too strong to be ignored.
Bull by the Horns: Fighting to Save Main Street from Wall Street and Wall Street from
Itself (5 Stars)
I don’t have time for a full review for now; all I have to say is that we have the
account of a person who says it the way it was, revealing the types of truths that
don’t fit the New York Times and others pawns. When history is written, this will be
used, not the spin by the bankers’ slaves and soldiers (Geithner, Rubin et al.) Bravo
Sheila!
Information: The New Language of Science (5 stars)
If you want an introduction to information theory, and, in a way, probability theory

from the real front door, this is it. A clearly written book, very intuitive, explains
things, such as the Monty Hall problem in a few lines. I will make it a prerequisite
before more technical great books, such as Cover and Thompson.
Free The Animal: Lose Weight & Fat With The Paleo Diet (5 stars)
A charming primer on the paleo idea, with an illustration through the authors own
life. I read it in one sitting.
Why Everyone (Else) Is a Hypocrite: Evolution and the Modular Mind (5 stars)
This is a great synthesis of the modularity approach to cognitive science. It covers

the entire field and has the right footnotes for the patches.
The style is readable, & the author has an attitude (with is a very good thing, but his
jokes are often bland, not aggressive enough). While I strongly disagree with his
treatment of morality (I am deontic), I can safely say, so far, that this is not just one
of the best books in cognitive science, but certainly one of the most readable.
Explaining Social Behavior: More Nuts and Bolts for the Social Sciences (5 stars)
I read this book twice. The first time, I thought that it was excellent, the best
15 compendium of ideas of social science by arguably the best thinker in the field. I
Shares
took copious notes, etc. I agreed with its patchwork-style approach to rational
decision making. I knew that it had huge insights applicable to my refusal of general
theories [they don’t work], rather limit ourselves to nuts and bolts [they work].
Then I started reading it again, as the book tends to locate itself by my bedside and
sneaks itself in my suitcase when I go on a trip. It is as if the book wanted me to
read it. It is what literature does to you when it is at its best. So I realized why: it
had another layer of depth –and the author distilled ideas from the works of Proust,
La Rochefoucault, Tocqueville, Montaigne, people with the kind of insights that
extend beyond the ideas, and that makes you feel that a reductionist academic
treatment of the subject will necessary distort it [& somehow Elster managed to
combine Montaigne and Kahneman-Tversky]. So as an anti-Platonist I finally found
a rigorous treatment of human nature that is not Platonistic –not academic (in the
bad sense of the word).
The Discovery of France: A Historical Geography from the Revolution to the First
World War (5 stars)
This book has wonderful qualities that I am certain will be picked up by other
reviewers. But I would like to add the following. This is the most profound
examination of how nationality is enforced on a group of people, with the internal
colonization process and the stamping out of idiosyncratic traits. As someone
suspicious of government and state control, I was wondering how France did so
well in spite of having a big government. This book gave me the answer: it took a
long time for the government and the “nation” to penetrate the depth of deep
France, “la France profonde”. It was not until recently that French was spoken by
the majority of the citizens. Schools taught French but it was just like Greek or
Latin: people forgot it right after they finished their (short) school life. For a long
time France’s villages were unreachable.
A great book, a great investigation.
Good Calories, Bad Calories: Challenging the Conventional Wisdom on Diet, Weight
Control, and Disease (5 stars)
15 Gary Taubes is a true empiricist. I can’t believe people hold on to the Platonicity of
Shares
the thermodynamic theory of diet (calorie in = calorie out).
Read it twice, once for the diet, once a a rich document in the history of science.
Plato and a Platypus Walk into a Bar: Understanding Philosophy Through Jokes (4
stars)
I read Plato and the Platypus by Umberto Eco, which I found brilliant and was
sucked into buying this book thinking it was about the same problem of categories.
But Philosophy this is not, or if it is, it is not deep enough to give satisfaction. This
is like a brief drink in an airplane lounge with someone funny, smart, witty, but not
too funny. So I would give it my lowest rating: 4 stars (as an author I can’t give
below that –I just would not review).
Would I buy it again? Perhaps, but only for a plane ride. It left me very very hungry
for both jokes and philosophy.
Seeking Wisdom: From Darwin to Munger, 3rd Edition (5 Stars)
A wonderful book on wisdom and decision-making written by a wise decision-

maker. This is the kind of book you read first, then leave by your bedside and re-
read a bit every day, so you can slowly soak up the wisdom. It is sort of Montaigne
but applied to business, with a great investigation of the psychological dimension of
decision-making.
I like the book for many reasons –the main one is that it was written by a
practitioner who knows what he wants, not by an academic.
Enjoy it.
The Doctrine of Deification in the Greek Patristic Tradition (5 stars)
I initially bought this book as I was curious about the differences between Eastern &
Western traditions, particularly with the notion of theosis –the deification of man.
This book goes far deeper, and covers pre-Christian practices (like Stoic thoughts,
the deifications of Kings, Roman Emperors, that of private citizens who committed
15 symbolic acts –such as Antinous, Hadrian’s obsession, who drowned to “save”
Shares
mankind and other sotirologies).
The book was initially Russell’s doctoral thesis, which, as far as I can guess from the
dates, had to have been completed when he was in late middle age. But he made it
very readable, free of the theophilosophical jargon of similar texts. He still has
quotes in the original language and it is a true piece of scholarship.
Statistical Models: Theory and Practice (5 stars)
I spent my life focusing on the errors of statistics and how they sometimes fail us in
real life, because of the misinterpretation of what the techniques can do for you.
This book is outstanding in the following two aspects: 1) It is of immense clarity,
embedding everything in real situations, 2) It uses the real-life situation to critique
the statistical model and show you the limit of statistic. For instance, he shows a
few anecdotes here and there to illustrate how correlation between two variables
might not mean anything causal, or how asymptotic properties may not be relevant
in real life.
This is the first statistics book I’ve seen that cares about presenting statistics as a
tool to GET TO THE TRUTH.
Please buy it.
Happy Accidents: Serendipity in Modern Medical Breakthroughs (5 stars)
The Birth Stochastic Science: Rewriting the History of Medicine
Controlled experiment can easily show absence of design in medical research: you
compare the results of top-down directed research to randomly generated
discoveries. Well, the U.S. government provides us with the perfect experiment for
that: the National Cancer Institute that came out of the Nixon “war on cancer” in
the early 1970s.
“Despite the Herculean effort and enormous expense, only a few drugs for the
treatment of cancer were found through NCI’s centrally directed, targeted program.
Over a twenty-year period of screening more than 144,000 plant extracts,
representing about 15,000 species, not a single plant-based anticancer drug reached
15 approved status. This failure stands in stark contrast to the discovery in the late
Shares
1950s of a major group of plant-derived cancer drugs, the Vinca Alcaloids -a
discovery that came about by chance, not through directed research.”
From Happy Accidents: Serendipity in Modern Medical Breakthroughs, by Morton

Meyers, a book that just came out. It is a MUST read. Please go buy it. Read it twice,
not once. Although the author does not take my drastic “stochastic tinkering”
approach, he provides all kind of empirical evidence for the role of design. He does
not directly discuss the narrative fallacy(q.v.) and the retrospective distortion (q.v.)
but he certainly allows us to rewrite the history of medicine.
We did not realize that cures for cancer had been coming from other brands of
research. You search for noncancer drugs and find something you were not looking
for (and vice versa). But the interesting constant:
a- The discoverer is almost always treated like an idiot by his colleagues. Meyers
describes the vicious side effect of “peer reviewing”.
b- Often people see the result but cannot connect the dots (researchers are autistic
in their own way).
c- The members of the guild gives the researcher a hard time for not coming from
their union. Pasteur was a chemist not a doctor/biologist. The establishment kept
asking him “where is your M.D., monsieur”. Luckily Pasteur had too much
confidence to be deterred.
d- Many of the results are initially discovered by an academic researchers who
neglects the consequences because it is not his job –he has a script to follow. Or he
cannot connect the dots because he is a nerd. Meyers uses Darwin as the ultimate
model: the independent gentleman scholar who does not need anyone and can
follow a lead when he sees it.
e- It seems to me that discoverers are nonnerds.
Now it is depressing to see the works of the late Roy Porter, a man with remarkable
curiosity and a refined intellect, who wrote many charming books on the history of
medicine. Does the narrative fallacy cancels everything he did? I hope not. We
urgently need to rewrite the history of medicine without the ex post explanations.
Meyers started the process: he provides data for modern medicine since, say,
Pasteur. I am more interested in the genesis of the field before the Galenic
nerdification.
Financial Derivatives: Pricing, Applications, and Mathematics (5 stars)

15
Shares
One of the author, Baz, gave me a copy of this book when it came out and it went to
sleep in my library as I was not in a finance mood. I forgot about it until this week as
I was stuck on a problem related to risk-neutral pricing and the Girsanov theorem
concerning changes in probability measure. I looked at every passage on the the
subject until I hit on it. Then I realized that I should have read it before: it is a
condensed, but extremely deep , and complete exposition of the subject of
theoretical finance.
No financial book has the clarity of this text.
Other quant books do not have such notions as “pricing kernel” and economic
theoretical matters. I would recommend it as a necessary piece of the “quant”
toolkit. Every quant should have it as a background tool as the usual quant literature
is standalone and devoid of these concepts.
Thinking and Deciding (5 stars)
People vote with their wallet –particularly when they do it a second time, when they
REpurchase. Those who believe in the “revelation of preferences” should note that
there are books one buys again when a copy is lost –particularly when they are read
cover to cover.
I am buying another copy of this book as mine was lost or misplaced. That should
speak volumes.
Critical Phenomena in Natural Sciences: Chaos, Fractals, Selforganization and

Disorder: Concepts and Tools (Springer Series in Synergetics) (5 stars)
As I am teaching the statistical mechanics part of a graduate class in mathematics,I

was looking for a textbook on complex systems & statistical physics with
derivations, intuitions, and some physical examples. I did not realize that I was
looking too far –Sornette, with hom I correspond regularly, is well known for his
contributions and his prolific output (actually some physicists make fun of the
quantity of papers he writes). So his book did not come to mind. I once stumbled on
a problem with the derivation of preferential attachments;he recommended his
book, which I took with a grain a salt. After spending some time working the
15 derivations on scalable laws, extreme value theory, renormalization groups in this
Shares
book, I elected to use it as my textbook. There is no equivalent. I have a dozen such
yellow manuals; this one is complete and ultimately clearest.
I do not know of a better textbook.
The Wisdom Paradox: How Your Mind Can Grow Stronger As Your Brain Grows Older
(5 stars)
If you like the thinker’s prose, the so-called “romantic science”,a style attributed to
the Russian neuroscientist A. R. Luria,which consists in publishing original research
in literary form, you would love this book. Clearly intellectual scientists are
vanishing under the weight of the commoditization of the discipline. But once in a
while someone emerges to reverse such setbacks.
Goldberg, who was the great Luria’s student and collaborator, is even more colorful
and fun to read than the master. He is egocentric, abrasive, opinionated, and
colorful. He is also disdainful of the conventional beliefs in neurosciences –for
instance he is suspicious of the assignment of specific functions, such as language,
to anatomical regions. He is also skeptical of the journalistic “triune” brain. His
theory is that the hemispheric specialization is principally along pattern matching
and information processing lines:the left side stores patterns, while the right one
processes novel tasks. It is convincing to see that children suffer more from a right
brain injury, while adults have the opposite effect.
There is a little bit of open plugging of Goldberg’s for-profit institute;he would have
gotten better results by being subtle. A fre minor points. I did not understand why
Goldberg discusses “modularity”, of which he is critical, as if it were the same thing
in both neurobiology and in cognitive science. In neurobiology, modularity implies
regional localization, while cognitive scientists (Marr, Fodor, etc.) make no such
assumption: for them it is entirely functional and they would be in great agreement
with Goldberg. Also I did not understand why he attributes the language instinct to
Pinker, not Chomsky, and why he makes snide remarks about behavioral scientists
like Kahneman and Tversky. But these are very minor details that do not weaken the
message (I still gave the book 5 stars). I am now spoiled; I need more essays by
opinionated, original,and intellectual, contemporary scientists.
The
15 Sunday Philosophy Club : An Isabel Dalhousie Mystery (5 stars)
Shares
If your interests are limited to mystery books, nothing else, this book is not for you.
I initially bought this book because of the title, thinking that we would have a
female version of Her Professor Dr Dr (Hon.) Moritz-Maria von Igenfeld, the
Pninish uberscholar philologist who wrote the seminal Portugese Irregular Verbs
(“after which there was nothing left to discuss about the subject, Nothing.”). I was
curious to see how he would present a female version of such scholar.
He did not. Nor was it a detective story, although there is an element of suspense.
This book is about Applied Ethics, a subject about which the author seems to know
a bit. It also makes you feel like leading a quite thinking life in Edinburgh.
I don’t want to spoil the story but I felt that I was reading a detective story until I
realized what it was…
How Nature Works: The Science of Self-organized Criticality (5 stars)
This book is a great attempt at finding some universality based on systems in a

“critical” state, with departures from such state taking place in a manner that
follows power laws. The sandpile is a great baby model for that.
Some people are critical of Bak’s approach, some even suggesting that we may not
get power laws in these “sandpile” effects, but something less scalable in the tails.
The point is :so what? The man has vision.
I looked at the reviews of this book. Clearly a few narrow-minded scientists do not
seem to like it (many did not like Per Bak’s ego). But the book is remarkably
intuitive and the presentation is so clear that he takes you by the hand. It is even
entertaining. If you are looking to find flaws in his argument his pedagogy allows it
(it is immediately obvious to us who dabble with simulations of these processes
that you need an infinite sandpile to get a pure power law).
Another problem. I have been ordering the book on Amazon for ages. Copernicus
books does not respond to emails. I got my copy at the NYU library. Bak passed
away 2 years ago and nobody seems to be pushing for his interest and that of us his
15 readers (for used books to sell for 99 implies some demand). This convinces me
Shares
NEVER to publish with Springer.
Social Cognition: Making Sense of People (5 stars)
I spent some time looking for a simple bedside aggregation of the various topics
associated with the psychology of decision making and the various perceptual
biases, without finding much. Most of the books are excellent; but, aside from this
one (and Jon Baron’s) they are usually compilation of original research. I like to
have a readable consolidation of the material not far from my figertips. I was lucky
to have found this book, which provides a wonderful and comprehensive coverage
of the topics.
It is limpid, precise, illustrative, showing a wonderful clarity of mind.
Now the bad news. The author passed away recently at the age of 48.
The (Mis)behavior of Markets (5 stars)
I have been involved in the professional practice of uncertainty for almost all of my
adult life. I’ve seen and read books and papers on the subject of deviations, with
“this is interesting” here and there. I closed this book feeling that it was the first
book in economics that spoke directly to me. Not only that, but this astonishing
simplicity, realism, and relevance of the subject makes it the only work in finance
I’ve read that seemed to make sense.
I cannot make justice to the book other than say 1) MAKES SENSE, 2) EASY TO
UNDERSTAND, 3) PRESENT SUCH EMPIRICAL VALIDY that it will make financial
economists (charlatans) have to hide deeper from the common man with their
complicated “mathematics”.
Mandelbrot brought fractals into mathematics by going to the general public. He is

doing the same here: pleading to the regular man unburnded with knowledge of
economics.
The Status Syndrome: How Social Standing Affects Our Health and Longevity (5 stars)
15
Shares
You are a hot shot in a company, though not the boss. You are paid extremely well,
but, again you have plenty of bosses above you (say the partners of an investment
firm). Is it better than deriving a modest income being your own boss? The
counterintuive answer is NO. You will live longer in the second situation, even
controlling for diet, lifestyle, and genetic predispositions.
Marmot spent years poring over data; he left no stone unturned and is well read in
the general literature on human nature. This idea of people living longer when they
exert control over their lives has not spread yet. That people lead longer lives when
they trust their neighbors and feel part of a community is far reaching. Just think of
the implications on social justice etc. Also think that everything you learn on human
preferences and well-being in both economics and medicine is either incomplete
(medicine) or bogus (economics).
The book is well written, humorous at times, and rigorous –it reads like a well-
translated scientific paper. But it feels that it is just the introduction to a topic.
Please, write the continuation.
The Paradox of Choice: Why More Is Less (5 stars)
I find it clear in its exposition of the problems of modern psychology. In addition to

the ideas of “satisficing”, it displays the major ideas in the psychology of happiness
(hedonic treadmill), along with the theories of choice & decision making.
Clearly this is not for scholars as it is extremely diluted and slow at times; this is a
popular science book. Still, I could not put it down.
The Dream of Reason: A History of Philosophy from the Greeks to the Renaissance (5
stars)
I could not put it down. It hit me at some point that I was at the intersection of
readability and scholarship. Clearly the value of this book lies beyond its readability:
Gottlieb is both a philosopher and a journalist (in the good sense), not a journalist
who writes about philosophy. He investigates and provides a fresh look at the
material: For instance what we bemoan as the flaws of Aristotelianism during the
15 scholastic period came 2000 years after his work. Aristotle had an empirical bent –
Shares
his followers are the ones to blame.
I liked his constant questioning of the labels put on philosophers and philosophies
by the second hand readers.
Clearly he missed a few authors who deserve real coverage like Algazali, but I take
what I can get.
The only other readable history of philosophy is Russell’s. This one was less
hurriedly put together.
Someone should bug the author to hurry with the sequel on Locke, Hume, etc.
Intellectuals in the Middle Ages (5 stars)
Excellent, be it only for the presentation of the difference between the pompous
scholastic thinker laboring in the academy and the other nonacademic humanist
laboring in the the “luxe calme et volupte” of his study.
Another of the attributes is the readability of the work Le Goff is a gifted writer.
Kant and the Platypus: Essays on Language and Cognition (5 stars)
I read the review of Simon Blackburn trashing the book: Eco made a few mistakes
concerning the two dogmas of empiricism (he confused Davidson’s work with
Quine’s first dogma). So I am sure many readers hesitated after a review by such a
rigorous big gun thinker as Blackburn.
When I started reading the book I was taken aback by the combination of depth and
the vividness of the style. Eco is sprightly and alive, something that cannot be said
of many philosophers dealing with the subject of categories.
The notion of categories is not trivial: you need a simple conditional prior to
identify an object; it is a simple mathematical fact. You need to know what a table is
to see it in the background separated from its surroundings. You need to know what
a face is so when it rotates you know it is still the same face. Computers have had a
15 hard time with such pattern recognition. A PRIOR category is a necessity. This was
Shares
Kant’s intuition (the so-called “rationalism”). This is also the field of semiotics as
initially conceived. Eco took it to greater levels with his notion of what I would call
in scientific language a compression, a “simplifation”. This leads to the major
problem we face today: what if the act of compressing is arbitrary?
Not just very deep but it is a breath of fresh air to see such a philosophical
discussion nondull, nondry, alive!
Confessions of a Philosopher: A Personal Journey Through Western Philosophy from

Plato to Popper (5 stars)
This is not a polularization /adult-education style presentation. Magee sees things

form the inside; it is his own formation of philosophical ideas & techniques that we
witness.
Magee was close enough to Popper to present us with his ideas first-hand (nobody
reads Popper; people read about him). He also debunks a few idiotic myths about
Wittgenstein as an atomist (Magee read W and realized that people read
commentary on him rarely the original).
Magee writes with the remarkable clarity of the English philosophers/thinkers.
Invariances: The Structure of the Objective World (5 stars)
Philosophy has been under severe challenge from science, literally eating up its
provinces: philosophy of mind went to neuroscience; philosophy of language to
Artificial Intelligence and Computer Science,etc. This book shows that there is a
need for someone to just specialize in the TRUTH, its scructure, its accessibility, its
INVARIANCE.
Aside from the purely philosophical answers that scientists were grappling with, the
book is like a manual for a new regimen in philosophy. It reviews everything from
epistemology to the logic of contingency, with insights here and there about such
topics as the observer biases (about computing probabilities when our existence has
been linked to a particular realization of the process).
15
Shares
I am not a philosopher but a probabilist; I found that this book just spoke to me. It
certainly rid me of my prejudice against modern philosophers.
A History of the Mind: Evolution and the Birth of Consciousness (5 stars)
Humphreys is the only person I know of who can work on nonhuman primates,
write philosophy, and edit a literary magazine.
The latter shows in this writing: I read this book in a single sitting. You may not
agree with the ideas on consciousness (I don’t) but you get a clear exposition of all
the work from Descartes to McGinn. Also if you want to figure out what Dennett is
saying it helps to read this book first.
Bull! : A History of the Boom, 1982-1999: What drove the Breakneck Market–and What
Every Investor Needs to Know About Financial Cycles (5 stars)
Maggie Mahar had the courage to take a look at what was behind all of this religious
belief in markets. Clearly I do not understand how she was able to work as a
journalist when she has the attitude and mindset of a truth-seeker. I spent some
time looking at the difference between her book and Lowenstein’s: not even
possible to start comparing. One needs to be a trader to value her work.
Read this book now; wait a while then read it again.
I Think, Therefore I Laugh (5 stars)
I found this copy last week at Waterstone in London . It made me feel the plane ride
was very short! I should have bought a couple. This is a great book for a refresher in
analytical philosophy: pleasant, clear. Great training for people who tend to forget
elementary relationships.
I did not know that JAP was a logician. Go buy this book!
The only competition is “Think” by Blackburn (rather boring).
The Making of a Philosopher: My Journey Through Twentieth-Century Philosophy (4

stars)
15
Shares
This is a great book but I felt something cold inside of me while reading it. I don’t
know if it is cultural (the modern English philosopher’s fear of displaying passion)
but I had the feeling to talk to a plumber who developed expertise in abstract
concepts and their relationships just as if they were small plumbing problems fitting
together under a generalized plumbing theory. Perhaps philosophy needs to be
treated like that, just like engineering –but not for me. At least I give myself the
illusion of doing something more…literary.
Colin McGINN teaches us that we need nevertheless to master the art of clarity of
both thought and exposition. He write with perfect clarity: a clear, unburdened,
unaffected, UnFrench UnGerman philosophical prose.
The book has a presentation of the Kripke idea of naming as necessity of such
clarity that I felt actually smart reading it.
Other than that there is the feeling of drabness in part of the book of the type I got
once at a conference in an industrial city West of London.
Straw Dogs: Thoughts on Humans and Other Animals (4 stars)
I became interested in this book while reading a review panning it in The Nation by
one Danny Postell (thanks to Arts & Letters Daily). Clearly it was visible that John
Gray was after a definition of humans that integrates our discoveries from cognitive
science, that we are just animals who are curse with intelligence, sufficient
intelligence to figure out things but insufficient to control our actions –what I call
the ability to rationalize (“much of the difference between us and other primates
lies in our being considerably better than them at explaining our behavior”). Postel
(I have no clue who he is and what kind of training he has in modern scientific
thought but I am sure that he is sufficiently burdened with a knowledge of
humanities verbiage to get the book wrong); Postel was panning Gray exactly for the
reasons that would make this book insightful. So I BOUGHT THIS BOOK
BECAUSE OF A BAD REVIEW!
What struck me with this book is that Gray converges in opinion to the discoveries
of the New Science of Man –without quoting from neurobiology, cognitive science,
15 evolutionary psychology, the Kahneman-Tversky Heuristics & Biases Tradition. It is
Shares
remarkable that he identified the ills of the so-called humanist tradition without
assistance from the works on rationality posited by Kahneman and his peers.
This book is worth 4 stars because here we have a literary intellectual who manages
to break through the mud in his knowledge. It would have been worth 5 stars had
Gray read a few more works in scientific thought beyond Darwin. Anyway I am very
impressed with a literary intellectual capable of this empirical and realistic view of
man.
Mapping the Mind (5 stars)
I started my interest in neurobiology in December 1998 after reading a discussion by

Rita Carter in the FT showing that rational behavior under uncertainty and rational
decision making can come from a defect in the amygdala. Since then I’ve had five
years of reading more technical material (Gazzaniga et al is perhaps the most
complete reference on cognitive neuroscience) and thought that I transcended this
book.
But it was not so. I picked up this book again last weekend and was both astonished
at a) the ease of reading , b) the clarity of the text and c) the breadth of the
approach! I was looking for a refresher as I am trying to capture a general idea of the
functioning of that black box and found exactly what I needed without the excess
burden of prominent textbooks.
Very pedagogical.
I read here and there comments by neuroscientists dissing the book over small
details perhaps invisible even to experts. I just realize that Carter should keep
updating it, as it is invaluable in my suitcase when I travel! I do not conceal my

suspicion of “science writers” and journalists more trained in communicating than
understanding and usually shallow babblers but Carter is an exception. Perhaps the
science of the mind requires breadth of knowledge that she has. She is a thinker in
her own right not just a “medical journalist”.
The Mind Doesn’t Work That Way (5 stars)
15 This critique of the computational theory of mind and the pan-adaptionist tradition
Shares
is clearly so honest that it goes after the ideas promoted by Fodor’s own 1983
watershed book “The Modularity of Mind”. In brief the essay is an attack on massive
modularity by saying that there are things after all that escape the programming
(encapsulation and opacity are key: how can we talk about something OPAQUE? We
know nothing about a few critical things…).
Granted the book is horribly written (that is Fodor’s charm after all) but his
argumentation is so ferocious that he ends up loud & clear.
The man is critical of his own ideas, and of the current in thought that he he helped
create –one may use Fodor-1 against Fodor-2. Perhaps persons I hold in highest
respect are those who go after their own ideas!
Bravo Fodor. Even if I do not agree I can’t help admiring the man.
Consciousness: An Introduction (5 stars)
I am glad to find a complete book dealing with all aspects of consciousness in

CLEARLY written format, with graphs and tables to facilitate comprehension. The
book covers everything I had seen before from Artificial Intelligence to Philosophy
to Neurology to Evolutionary Biology.
Say one wants to get an idea of Dan Dennett’s theory of consciousness (without
having to get through Dennett’s circuitous, unfocused and evasive prose) or Searle’s
Chinese room argument or Turing’s test or Chalmer’s position or Churchland’s
neurophilosophy or a presentation of research on the neural correlates of
consciousness…Everything I could think about is there.
Mean Genes: From Sex to Money to Food: Taming Our Primal Instincts (5 stars)
I read the book once when it came out. Since then I’ve had the chance to reread it a
few times, discovering more and more layers as my interests take me in new
directions(for instance the discussion on the happiness treadmill goes to the core of
the current discussions in the economics of happiness). I now carry a copy on my
trips as I can kill time in airports by perusing random sections.
15 The book is so readable as to perhaps set a standard. Yet it is complete in the sense
Shares
that it covers more of the evolutionary thinking than meets the eye. I didn’t realize
it until I went to the site www.meangenes.org and got into the more technical
research material.
Reread it.
Why Stock Markets Crash: Critical Events in Complex Financial Systems (5 stars)
The author aside from the problem of crashes presents an insightful exposition of
tipping points. I don’t know why his approach makes it clearer and deeper than
those of Watts and Barabasi –is it due to his using financial markets as a base? or his
being an expert at fat-tailed dynamics?
His work builds on the “abyssus abyssum invocat” (panic begets panics) and the
dynamics of compounding disequilibria. In addition the notion of “CRITICAL
POINT” is made very clear.
Honestly I don’t care for the idea of crashes; the same concepts can apply to sudden
and unexpected euphorias.
I learned more from this book than any other on disequilibrium.
The New Financial Order: Risk in the 21st Century (5 stars)
Robert Shiller has the remarkable ability to think independently and the courage to
propose ideas that to middlebrow thinkers may sound speculative.
Think of what your reaction would have been had someone discussed risk sharing
(insurance) before it became popular. A lunacy people would have thought. Most
risk management is like that: we think backwards with the benefit of past history
and find these ideas obvious. They were not at the time.
Throughout his career Shiller stood for unpopular ideas and was proven right (his
1981 paper on volatility, his 2000 discussion of the bubble). I would read and re-
read this book.
Strangers to Ourselves: Discovering the Adaptive Unconscious (5 stars)

15
Shares
The book that carried the most influence on my thinking this year (I went back to it
half a dozen times).
This is a clearly written presentation of our inability to forecast our own behavior
and to predict our emotional reactions to positive and negative events. One would
think that the repetition of experiences with consistent forecasting biases would
lead to some correction but this is not the case.
We are more resilient than we think (“immune neglect”). The book also discusses
the reversion to baseline happiness after what we thought would bring a permanent
improvement in our moods (yet we never learn from it).
The most important part covers the “hindsight bias” how we see past misfortunes
as deterministic –and how we can confront negative emotions by making them even
more so (by creating a narrative that make the events appear unavoidable).
The Blank Slate: The Modern Denial of Human Nature (4 stars)
The book is a great exposition of modern scientific thinking and understanding of

the nature of man–but it spends some time on topics that are entirely obvious
outside of the humanities academia. Indeed Pinker gives them too much respect by
honoring them with such a lengthy reply.
His other two books are much better.
No Bull: My Life In and Out of Markets (5 stars)
As a speculator I learned to take the best from books and ideas without arguments
(many readers seem to be training to be shallow critics)–good insights are hard to
come by. One does not find these in the writings of a journalist. There are some
things personal to the author that might be uninteresting to some, but I take the
package. The man is one of the greatest traders in history. There are a few jewels in
there.
The man did it. I’d rather listen to him than read better written but hollow prose
from some journalist-writer.
The
15 Statistical Mechanics of Financial Markets (5 stars)
Shares
Very useful book, particularly in what concerns alternative L-Stable distributions.

True, not too versed in financial theory but I’d rather see the author erring on the
side of more physics than mathematical economics. As an author I don’t ask much
from books, just to deliver what they indend. This one does.
Clear historical description of Einstein/Bachelier. Hopefully one day we will call

derivatives pricing the Bachelier valuation.
The book in short provides an excellent perspective on the statistical approach to

asset price dynamics. Very clear and to the point.
Tartar Steppe (Verba Mundi) (5 stars)
I never understood why the book never made it in the Anglo-Saxon world. Il deserto
is one of the 20th century’s masterpieces.
A Guide to Econometrics – 4th Edition (5 stars)
The best intuition builder in both statitics and econometrics. I have been reading
the various editions throught my career. Please, keep updating it, Peter Kennedy!
TAGGED: BOOK RECOMMENDATIONS, BOOKS, NASSIM TALEB, READING LISTS
 Master of Influence Robert Cialdini Recommends Five Books
Owning up to Your Ignorance by Saying “I Don’t Know” 
15
Shares
Suggested Reading
The Best of Farnam Street 2018

READING TIME | 3 MINUTES
We read for the same reasons we have conversations — to enrich our lives.
Reading helps us to think, feel, and reflect — not only upon ourselves and others
but upon our ideas, and our relationship with the world. Reading deepens our
understanding and helps us live consciously. Of the 46 articles we published on
FS this […]
CONTINUE READING 
Winner Takes it All: How Markets Favor the

Few at the Expense of the Many
Markets tend to favor unequal distributions of market share and profits, with a
few leaders emerging in any industry. Winner-take-all markets are hard to
disrupt and suppress the entry of new players by locking in market share for
leading players. *** In almost any market, crowds of competitors fight for
business within their niche. But […]
15
Shares
Thought Experiment: How Einstein Solved

Difficult Problems
The Basics of Thought Experiment Imagine a small town with a hard-working

barber. The barber shaves everyone in the town who does not shave themselves.
He does not shave anyone who shaves themselves. So, who shaves the barber?
The ‘impossible barber’ is one classic example of a thought experiment — a
means of exploring a […]
JOIN OVER 232,197 SUBSCRIBERS
Upgrade Yourself
Email Address
SUBSCRIBE
FARNAM STREET
Newsletter
Podcast
15
Shares
Learning Community
Speaking
About
CATEGORIES
Mental Models
Learning
Reading
Leadership
Decision Making
PARTNER
Sponsorship
Workshops
CONNECT
    
 2019 Farnam Street Media Inc. All Rights Reserved.

Hosted by Pressable. See our Privacy Policy.
We're Syrus Partners. We buy amazing businesses.
15
Shares

Book Recommendations From Nassim Taleb

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Book Recommendations From Nassim Taleb

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Book Recommendations From Nassim Taleb

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

15/07/2019 Book Recommendations from Nassim Taleb

Book Recommendations from Nassim Taleb

Solid Book on Interventionism, Should be Mandatory Reading in Foreign

The general public is usually supplied by books on mathematical scientists written

(April 2016) The Secret of Fatima (5 Stars)

(May 2015) Birth of a Theorem: A Mathematical Adventure (5 stars)

The mathematics of extreme events, or the remote parts of the probability

15 There are two methods to consider in a risky strategy.

(Ed. I posted on Peter’s Book)

Indispensable. As a practitioner of probability, I’ve read many book on the subject.

Probability, Random Variables and Stochastic Processes (5 Stars)

Mathematics: Its Content, Methods and Meaning (5 Stars)

Probability Theory (Courant Lecture Notes) (5 Stars)

Models.Behaving.Badly.: Why Confusing Illusion with Reality Can Lead to Disaster, on

Here is what I wrote in my endorsement: Emanuel Derman has written my kind of a

The Opposing Shore (5 Stars)

Information: The New Language of Science (5 stars)

If you want an introduction to information theory, and, in a way, probability theory

This is a great synthesis of the modularity approach to cognitive science. It covers

A great book, a great investigation.

Seeking Wisdom: From Darwin to Munger, 3rd Edition (5 Stars)

A wonderful book on wisdom and decision-making written by a wise decision-

The Doctrine of Deiﬁcation in the Greek Patristic Tradition (5 stars)

Statistical Models: Theory and Practice (5 stars)

Happy Accidents: Serendipity in Modern Medical Breakthroughs (5 stars)

The Birth Stochastic Science: Rewriting the History of Medicine

From Happy Accidents: Serendipity in Modern Medical Breakthroughs, by Morton

Financial Derivatives: Pricing, Applications, and Mathematics (5 stars)

No ﬁnancial book has the clarity of this text.

Thinking and Deciding (5 stars)

Critical Phenomena in Natural Sciences: Chaos, Fractals, Selforganization and

As I am teaching the statistical mechanics part of a graduate class in mathematics,I

I do not know of a better textbook.

How Nature Works: The Science of Self-organized Criticality (5 stars)

This book is a great attempt at ﬁnding some universality based on systems in a

Social Cognition: Making Sense of People (5 stars)

It is limpid, precise, illustrative, showing a wonderful clarity of mind.

The (Mis)behavior of Markets (5 stars)

Mandelbrot brought fractals into mathematics by going to the general public. He is

The Paradox of Choice: Why More Is Less (5 stars)

I ﬁnd it clear in its exposition of the problems of modern psychology. In addition to

Intellectuals in the Middle Ages (5 stars)

Kant and the Platypus: Essays on Language and Cognition (5 stars)

Confessions of a Philosopher: A Personal Journey Through Western Philosophy from

This is not a polularization /adult-education style presentation. Magee sees things

Magee writes with the remarkable clarity of the English philosophers/thinkers.

Invariances: The Structure of the Objective World (5 stars)

A History of the Mind: Evolution and the Birth of Consciousness (5 stars)

Read this book now; wait a while then read it again.

I Think, Therefore I Laugh (5 stars)

The only competition is “Think” by Blackburn (rather boring).

The Making of a Philosopher: My Journey Through Twentieth-Century Philosophy (4

Straw Dogs: Thoughts on Humans and Other Animals (4 stars)

Mapping the Mind (5 stars)

I started my interest in neurobiology in December 1998 after reading a discussion by

updating it, as it is invaluable in my suitcase when I travel! I do not conceal my

The Mind Doesn’t Work That Way (5 stars)

Consciousness: An Introduction (5 stars)

I am glad to ﬁnd a complete book dealing with all aspects of consciousness in