Land Acquisition and Resettlement Action Plan (LARAP) For Waesano Geothermal Exploration Project Manggarai Barat Regency, Nusa Tenggara Timur Province, Indonesia

Land Acquisition and Resettlement Action
Plan (LARAP)
for Waesano Geothermal Exploration
Project
Manggarai Barat Regency, Nusa Tenggara
Timur Province, Indonesia
MARET 2019
GEUDP-WS-RPT-HSE-005-1 Waesano LARAP
Funded by: World Bank Group and New Zealand Foreign Affairs & Trade Aid Programme
Table of Contents
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .......................................................................................................................IX
1. INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................... 1
1.1. BACKGROUND .............................................................................................................................. 1
1.2. SCOPE OF LARAP ....................................................................................................................... 1
1.3. REPORT STRUCTURE .................................................................................................................... 2
2. DESCRIPTION OF THE PROJECT ............................................................................................. 3
2.1. PROJECT STATUS ......................................................................................................................... 3
2.2. PROJECT LOCATION...................................................................................................................... 3
3. POTENTIAL IMPACTS ................................................................................................................. 6
3.1. PROJECT COMPONENTS REQUIRE LAND ........................................................................................ 6
3.2. SCOPE OF IMPACTS ...................................................................................................................... 9
3.3. VULNERABLE PEOPLE ................................................................................................................. 10
3.4. SEVERELY PAPS ........................................................................................................................ 10
3.5. SHARECROPPERS ....................................................................................................................... 10
4. SOCIO ECONOMICHOUSEHOLD SURVEY OF THE PROJECT AFFECTED PERSONS ...... 17
4.1. Stakeholder Interview and Households Socio Economic Survey of the PAPs ..................... 17
4.2. Overviewon the Result of Households Socio Economic Survey .......................................... 18
4.3. Demographic Characteristic of PAPs.................................................................................... 19
4.3.1. Age and Gender Distribution ............................................................................................. 19
4.3.2. Education ........................................................................................................................... 19
4.4. Economic Condition and Livelihoods .................................................................................... 20
4.4.1. Livelihoods of the PAPs ..................................................................................................... 20
4.4.2. Land Tenure and Land Use ............................................................................................... 22
4.4.3. Level of Welfare ................................................................................................................. 23
4.5. HOUSING CONDITION..................................................................................................................25
4.6. COMMUNITY PERCEPTION ........................................................................................................... 26
4.6.1. Participation in Socialization .............................................................................................. 26
4.6.2. Knowledge of the Project ................................................................................................... 27
4.6.3. Concern toward the Project Land Acquisition ................................................................... 27
4.6.4. Willingness for Land Acquisition ........................................................................................ 28
4.6.5. Knowledge of the Project Grievance Process ................................................................... 29
5. LEGAL ANALYSIS...................................................................................................................... 30
5.1. INDONESIA LAW AND REGULATIONS ............................................................................................. 30
5.1.1. Land Acquisition ................................................................................................................ 30
5.1.2. Forestry Land Use ............................................................................................................. 32
5.1.3. Other Related Regulations6 .............................................................................................. 33
5.2. W ORLD BANK SAFEGUARDS POLICY ON LAND ACQUISITION ......................................................... 34
5.3. W ORLD BANK POLICY ON GENDER .............................................................................................. 35
5.4. SMI GEUDP ESMF ON RESETTLEMENT POLICY ......................................................................... 36
6. PROJECT ENTITLEMENT, ASSISTANCE AND BENEFICIAL MEASURES ............................ 43
6.1. GENERAL APPROACH.................................................................................................................. 43
6.2. LAND ACQUISITION AND RESETTLEMENT SCHEMES ...................................................................... 43
6.2.1. Resettlement of Individually-OwnedLand and Assets ....................................................... 44
6.2.2. Land Acquisition of Access Road Widening Area.............................................................. 44
6.2.3. Non-Individually Owned Asset ........................................................................................... 45
6.3. ELIGIBILITY, CUT-OFF DATE, AND ENTITLEMENT OF COMPENSATION .............................................. 45
LARAP
ii
7. VALUATION OF ASSETS AND CALCULATION OF COMPENSATION FOR LOSSES .......... 49
7.1. VALUATION OF ASSETS ............................................................................................................... 49
7.1.1. Compensation for Land Lease .......................................................................................... 50
7.1.2. Compensation of Non-Individually Owned Asset .............................................................. 50
7.1.3. Entitlement to Vulnerable and Severely PAPs................................................................... 50
7.2. CALCULATION OF COMPENSATION ............................................................................................... 51
8. CONSULTATION, PARTICIPATION AND INFORMATION DISCLOSURE ............................... 52
8.1. CONSULTATION AT PRIOR TO PREPARATION OF LARAP DOCUMENT .............................................. 52
8.2. CONSULTATION/SOCIALIZATION DURING PREPARATION OF LARAP DOCUMENT ............................. 53
8.3. DISCLOSURE .............................................................................................................................. 55
9. ORGANISATIONAL ARRANGEMENT AND RESPONSIBILITIES ........................................... 56
10. IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE ................................................................................................ 58
11. COST AND BUDGET.................................................................................................................. 61
11.1. COMPENSATION COST ............................................................................................................. 61
11.1.1. Estimated Compensation for Land ................................................................................. 61
11.1.2. Estimated Compensation for Affected Secondary Structure .......................................... 61
11.1.3. Estimated Compensation for Affected Plants/Trees....................................................... 61
11.1.4. Estimated Compensation for Forestry Land................................................................... 61
11.1.5. Livelihood Restoration Budget ....................................................................................... 62
11.1.6. Budget for Land Certification .......................................................................................... 62
11.2. TOTAL BUDGET FOR IMPLEMENTATION OF LARAP ......................................................................... 62
12. GRIEVANCE REDRESS MECHANISM...................................................................................... 64
13. MONITORING AND REPORTING .............................................................................................. 67
14. BIBLIOGRAPHY ......................................................................................................................... 68
APPENDIX A QUESTIONNAIRE FORM .............................................................................................. 69
Figures
Figure 2-1 Proposed Waesano Project Exploration Facilities.................................................................................. 5
Figure 3-1 Waesano Exploration Project Area of Interest (AOI) and Social Impact Zone........................................ 8
Figure 9-1 Project Management Unit (Jakarta Based) .......................................................................................... 57
Figure 9-2 Exploration Site Team .......................................................................................................................... 57
Figure 12-1Grievance Redress Mechanism .......................................................................................................... 66
Tables
Table 3-1 Land Requirement ................................................................................................................................... 6
Table 3-2 Scope of Impacts ..................................................................................................................................... 9
Table 3-3 Vulnerable and Severelly PAPs...............................................................................................................11
Table 3-4. List of Project Affected Peoples (PAPs)................................................................................................13
Table 4-1 Stakeholders Interview during LARAP Study ........................................................................................ 17
Table 4-2 Age ofProject Affected Peoples (PAPs)…...............................................................................................19
Table 4-3 Gender of PAPs ..................................................................................................................................... 19
LARAP
iii
Table 4-4. Education Level per Gender Category ................................................................................................. 19
Table 4-5. Occupation of the PAPs ........................................................................................................................ 20
Table 4-6 Education and Occupation of the PAPs Affected by Well Pad and Main Facilities ................................ 21
Table 4-7 Education and Occupation of the PAPs Affected by Access Road Widening ........................................ 21
Table 4-8. Livelihood of the Affected Household ................................................................................................... 21
Table 4-9 Average Land Ownership Area .............................................................................................................. 23
Table 4-10 Average Land Ownership .................................................................................................................... 23
Table 4-11. Expenses per Capita .......................................................................................................................... 24
Table 4-12. Income per Capita .............................................................................................................................. 24
Table 4-13 Social Assistance Programs ................................................................................................................ 24
Table 4-14 Land Status ......................................................................................................................................... 25
Table 4-15 House Building Condition .................................................................................................................... 26
Table 4-16. PAPs Participation in Project Socialization ......................................................................................... 26
Table 4-17. PAPs Knowledge of Planned Project and Land Acquisition Plan ........................................................ 27
Table 4-18 PAPs Concern toward the Land Acquisition Plan ................................................................................ 28
Table 4-19.PAPs Willingness for Land Acquisition ................................................................................................ 28
Table 4-20 Knowledge of Project Grievance Mechanism ...................................................................................... 29
Table 5-1 Gap Analysis ......................................................................................................................................... 37
Table 6-1 Entitlement for the Project PAPs............................................................................................................ 46
Table 7-1. Replacement COst Assessment Using Indonesia's Valuation Approaches .......................................... 49
Table 8-1 Consultation Prior to Preparation of LARAP Document ..................................................................... 532
Table 8-2 Consultation /Socialization During Preparation of LARAP Document ............................................... 533
Table 9-1 Roles and Responsibility of the Project Land Acquisition Process ........................................................ 56
Table 10-1 Land Acquisition Schedule .................................................................................................................. 58
Table 11-1 Total Budget for Implementation of LARAP ......................................................................................... 62
LARAP
iv
Abbreviation
AMDAL Analisis Mengenai Dampak Lingkunganor Environmental Impact Assessment

AOI Area of Interest
BG Badan Geologior Geological Unit
BPN Badan Pertanahan Nasionalor National Land Agency
BPS Badan Pusat Statistikor Central Bureau of Statistics
CDP Community Development Program
CSR Corporate Social Responsibility
Ditjen EBTKE Direktorat Jenderal Energi Baru Terbarukan dan Konservasi Energior Directorate-General of New
Renewable Energy and Energy Conservation
ESIA Environmental and Social Impact Assessment
ESMF Environmental and Social Management Framework
ESMP Environmental and Social Management Plan
EST Exploration Site Team
FGD Focus Group Discussion
GEUDP Geothermal Energy Upstream Development Project
GIS Geographical Information System
GRM Grievance Redress Mechanism
HR Human Resource
IDR Indonesian Rupiah
IPPKH Ijin Pinjam Pakai Kawasan Hutanor Borrow and Use Permit of Forestry Area
KJPP Kantor Jasa Penilai Publik or certified public appraisal
LARAP Land Acquisition and Resettlement Action Plan
LAT Land Acquisition Team
LRP Livelihood Restoration Program
MAPPI Masyarkat Profesi Penilai Indonesiaor Indonesian Society of Appraisers
MEMR Ministry of Energy and Mineral Resources
NJOP Nilai Jual Objek Pajakor Sale Value of Taxation Object
OP / BP Operational Policy / Bank Procedures
PAPs Project Affected People
PIB Project Information Booklet
PMU Project Management Unit
PNPB Penerimaan Negara Bukan Pajakor Non-Tax Government Income
PR Presidential Regulation
SEP Stakeholder Engagement Plan
SKBPT Surat Keterangan Bukti Kepemilikan Tanah or Letter of Land Ownership Reference
SKT Surat Keterangan Tanahor Reference Letter for Land Ownership
SMI Sarana Multi Infrastruktur
SPPT PBB Surat Pemberitahuan Pajak Terhutang Pajak Bumi dan Bangunanor Notification of Tax Liability for
Land and Building Tax
LARAP
v
SPI 204 Indonesia Valuation Standards 204
UKL Upaya Pengelolaan Lingkunganor Environmental Management Effort
UPL Upaya Pemantauan Lingkunganor Environmental Monitoring Effort
USD United Stated Dollar
LARAP
vi
Definition of Terms
Project Affected persons Refers to any person or persons, customary or local community, private or public
(PAPs)/ Community/ institution who are displaced (physical or economic) as result of temporary
Households (AHs) impacts during construction, restriction on land use or on access to legally
designated parks and protected areas. The affected community/ households/
person is those who utilize, control, or possess the affected land or non-land
objects.
Compensation Payment in cash or in kind (e.g. land-for-land) to replace losses of land, housing,
income and other assets caused by the Project. All compensation is based on
the principle of replacement cost, which is the method of valuing assets to
replace the loss at current market value, and any transaction costs such as
administrative charges, taxes, registration and titling costs. In the absence of
functioning markets, a compensation structure is required that enables affected
people to restore their livelihoods to level at least equivalent to those maintained
at the time of dispossession, displacement, or restricted access.
Cut-off date Cut-off date is the date the census begins. The cut-off date could also be the
date the project area was delineated, prior to the census, provided that there
has been an effective public dissemination of information on the area
delineated, and systematic and continuous dissemination subsequent to the
delineation to prevent further population influx.
Eligibility Refers to any person who has settled in the subproject area before the cut-off
date that suffers from (i) loss of shelter, (ii) loss of assets (land, space above
and below the surface of the land, buildings, plant, and objects related to the
land) and/or or ability to access such assets, permanently or temporarily, or (iii)
other losses that can be appraised. such as transaction costs, interest, on loss
of residual land, loss of income sources or livelihood regardless of relocation,
profession shift, and other types of loss stated by the assignor, will be entitled
to compensation and/or assistance).
Entitlement A range of measures comprising compensation, income restoration support,
transfer assistance, income substitution, relocation support, etc. which are due
to the AHs, depending on the type and severity of their losses, to restore their
economic and social base.
Livelihood Restoration This involves re-establishing productive livelihood of the displaced persons to
Program enable income generation equal to or, if possible, better than that earned by the
displaced persons before the resettlement.
This is a program designed with various activities that aim to support affected
persons to recover their income / livelihood to pre-subproject levels. The
program is designed to address the specific needs of the affected persons
based on the socio-economic survey and consultations.
Involuntary resettlement Refers to physical and economic displacement as a result of (i) involuntary
acquisition of land, or (ii) involuntary restrictions on land use or on access to
legally designated parks and protected areas. Such displacement can be full or
partial, permanent or temporary.
When the displaced persons have no right to refuse the land acquisition by the
state that result in their displacement. This occurs when land is acquired through
(i) expropriation by invoking the eminent domain power of the state, or (ii) land
is acquired through negotiated settlement when the pricing is negotiated in a
LARAP
vii
process where expropriation will be the consequence of a failure in the
negotiation.
Land acquisition The process where an individual, household, firm or private institution is
compelled by an agency needing land for public interest to alienate all or part of
the land it owns or possesses to the ownership and possession of that agency
in return for compensation at replacement costs.
Meaningful Consultation A process that (i) begins early in the project preparation stage and is carried out
on an on-going basis throughout the project cycle; (ii) provides timely disclosure
of relevant and adequate information that is understandable and readily
accessible to affected people; (iii) is undertaken in an atmosphere free of
intimidation or coercion; (iv) is gender inclusive and responsive, and tailored to
the needs of disadvantaged and vulnerable groups; and (v) enables the
incorporation of all relevant views of affected people and other stakeholders into
decision making, such as project design, mitigation measures, the sharing of
development benefits and opportunities, and implementation issues.
Negotiated Land The agency in need of land can carry out land acquisition directly with the
Acquisition respective owners through negotiation based on the result of appraisal by an
Appraiser or a Public Appraiser for the sake of efficiency.1
Rehabilitation Assistance provided in cash or in kind to project APs (especially the vulnerable)
due to the loss of productive assets, incomes, employment or sources of living,
to supplement payment of compensation for acquired assets, in order to
achieve, at a minimum, full restoration of living standards and quality of life.
Relocation The physical displacement of an AP from her/his pre-project place of residence
and/or business.
Severely impacted Those who experience significant/major impacts due to (i) losses of 10% or
persons more of their total productive land, assets and/or income sources due to the
project; and/or (ii) relocation due to insufficient remaining residential land to
rebuild.
Vulnerable groups Distinct groups of people who might suffer disproportionately or face the risk of
being marginalized by the effects of resettlement and specifically include: (i)
households headed by women, elderly, or disabled, (ii) households falling under
the generally accepted indicator for poverty, (iii) landless households, and (iv)
ethnic minorities.
1
Per Regulation No. 6 of 2015 of the National Land Agency (Peraturan Menteri Agraria dan Tata Ruang/Kepala Badan
Pertanahan Nasional Nomor 6 Tahun 2015 tentang Perubahan atas Peraturan Kepala Badan Pertanahan Nasional Nomor 5
Tahun 2012 tentang Petunjuk Teknis Pelaksanaan Pengadaan Tanah) paragraph 53, and Presidential Decree of the Republic
of Indonesia Number 4 Year 2016 Concerning the Acceleration of Development of Electricity Infrastructures Article 34
LARAP
viii
Executive Summary
1. PT Sarana Multi Infrastruktur (SMI) is appointed by the Ministry of Finance (MoF) of Indonesia as the
implementing agency for Waesano Geothermal Exploration Project, located in Waesano Village, at Manggarai
Barat Regency of Nusa Tenggara Timur Province (hereafter referred as “the Project”). The Project is part of
government-sponsored exploration-drilling program in partnership with the World Bank under the Geothermal
Energy Upstream Development Project (GEUDP).
2. This Land Acquisition and Resettlement Action Plan (LARAP) is prepared as part of PT SMI commitment to
meet the GEUDP Environmental and Social Management Framework (ESMF) for sub-projects require
involuntary land acquisition. The objective of this LARAP is to assess the scope of impacts from the Project
land requirements, while providing guidance on the approach to land acquisition implementation for the
Project. Description of the Project land acquisition and resettlement scheme will be discussed in terms of how
it will be managed, either through land leases of individually-owned land, or borrow and use, and how this
should be implemented to adhere to GoI laws and regulations, as well as GEUDP ESMF, with reference to the
World Bank Operational Policy 4.12 on Involuntary Resettlement.
3. Summary of the Project land acquisition and resettlement scope of impacts as follow:
 Land lease of 88 land parcels of approximately 170,872 m2 large area affecting 62 people/ household for
the main exploration area of the Project (including well pad and its supportingfacilities);
 Compensation of 35 parcels of approximately 6,685 m2 to 20 PAPs will be affected by the access road
widening;
 A total of five(5) land parcels of the non-individually owned asset of forestry, village government, and
community of Nunang; and
 About 23,479 of plants and trees above the land, as well as six (6) units of plantation hut will be affected.
4. Household Socio Economic Survey is conducted to gather socio-economic baseline information of the Project
affected people (PAPs) and their household’s data. It was conducted to 68 of 82 (83%) of PAPs, while
remaining 14 PAPs were not available to interview during the time of survey was conducted. Detailed
measurement survey (DMS) will be conducted by West Manggarai District Land Office (Kantor ATR/BPN
Kabupaten Manggarai Barat) in order to verify measurement result from cadastral survey of affected land,
identification and inventory of non-land asset affected and ensure all was free from any ownership dispute the
owners. The owners of the land and other affected assets will be involved during DMS.The DMS results will
be used as final reference for payment of compensation and leasing.
5. Among others, this report also identifies 63 PAPs categorized as vulnerable and severely impacted including
as follow:
 42 people of women head of household, elderly head of household, and those living below the regional
poverty land are identified as vulnerable group; and
 58 people experience severely impacts including 10% or above of loss of land and income.
6. For the implementation of the Project land acquisition process, a set of regulatory requirements and best
practices standards are also presented to provide guidance of the Project minimum obligation for
compensation of land at full replacement values, as presented in Section 5 of this report. Meanwhile large part
of entitlement and calculation of land compensation will be conducted under the MAPPI’s SPI 204, which
defines provision of compensation for both, physical and non-physical objects that reflects the replacement
cost as required by the PRF (ESMF).
7. Eligibility, cut-off date, and entitlement for each of the affected people are summarised as follow:
LARAP
ix
 PAPs eligible for compensation including persons with formal legal rights to the loss land in its entirety or
in part; those who have no formal ownership rights to such land, but who have claims to such lands that
are recognized or recognizable under national laws e.g. through tax payment; persons cultivated the lands
of over 10 years and planted the loss land; however do not have claims to the land; andinstitutions have
rights over the loss land under Indonesia Law;
 The cut off date refers to the date when cadastral measurement is completed, which is at 31 August2018
whichhas been disseminated to PAPs during socialization of land acquisition.. This step is necessary to
anticipate issues related to compensation, potential opportunistic behaviour and other potential negative
impacts. After the cut-off date, those who encroach into the project area, or any of its subprojects, will not
be entitled to compensation or any other assistance;
 Compensation, Valuation, and Assistance. An entitlement matrix has been prepared to cover any losses
and compensation as well as assistance to be provided for the PAPs. Compensation, leasing and
assistance will be provided in cash or other forms as agreed by the PAPs and PT SMI for affected
farmlands, secondary structures, and trees, and crops at replacement cost, as determined by an
independent appraiser, without depreciation. Assistance is continuously ongoing, extended through PT
SMI’sCorporate Social Responsibility unit to cover livelihood/income restoration activities.
8. Implementation budget will cost approximately IDR 10, 615,584,753,-.or USD 758,256,- including for land lease
with compensation of affected structure and plants above the land, also livelihood restoration program planning
and operational cost of the land acquisition implementation.
9. Participationand Disclosure. Seriesof consultations were held with all affected communities and PAPs, district
and subdistrict local governments and down to the village level as coursed through community leaders (tua
golo). Issues, concerns and suggestions raised by the communities were noted and incorporated into the
development of this LARAP document. Following approval from the World Bank, the LARAP document will be
generated and produced in a timely manner, and posted in both World Bank’s and PT SMI’s websites, and at
any locally accessible place in a form and language understandable to the affected communities and other
stakeholders. The project information will be made available to affected communities as leaflets or brochure in
Bahasa Indonesia.
10. The implementation of this LARAPwill involve across units in the internal PT SMI and the Project’s Team,
including PMU Safeguard Team, Social Specialist, Exploration Site Team (EST) – in particular Site Manager
and Community Relations Officer. Externally, in collaboration of SMI PMU Safeguard Team and the EST will
liaise with the government of Manggarai Barat Regency throughout the whole land acquisition process within
the proposed schedule presented in Section 10 of the report.
11. As part of stakeholder engagement strategy a grievance redress mechanism (GRM) which can be accessed
by PAPs has been developed and disclosed to PAPs during socialization. In the field level, an agrieved people
can be lodged their complaints or grievance through drop box ( which availablein each sub-village and
subdistrict office) and /or through specific mobile number managed by PMU. This GRM will be further
disseminate to communities through distribution of booklet and put on the publicfacilities in each sub village.
Regular grievance management reports will be produced and included in the periodic environmental and social
management and monitoring implementation report.
12. .PMU Safeguards Team will undertake periodic monitoring of the implementation of the LARAP implementation
components. Independent monitoring to review and evaluate the implementation of land acquisition will be
conducted if deemed necessary. Implementation report will be developed at the final end of the land acquisition
process which will be submitted to the ministry of Finance and World Bank.
LARAP
x
1. Introduction
1.1. Background
1. With the identified potential for geothermal energy in Indonesia, the Government of Indonesia has set up a
government-sponsored exploration-drilling program in partnership with the World Bank under the Geothermal
Energy Upstream Development Project (GEUDP), to manage barriers of geothermal power development due
to large risk and prohibitive costs associated with exploring the resource. PT Sarana Multi Infrastruktur
(Persero) (“SMI”) will be one of the implementing agencies for the program based on the assignment from the
Ministry of Finance of Indonesia. From a technical point of view, the Ministry of Energy and Mineral Resources
(MEMR) under the Directorate General of Renewable Energy and Energy Conservation (Ditjen EBTKE) and
the Geological Unit (Badan Geologi – BG) will take part actively in the program. The program will be focused
on green field areas in the eastern part of Indonesia.
2. Based on a recommendation from the MEMR, SMI proposes the first geothermal exploration site at Waesano
Village on Manggarai Barat Regency, Flores Island (hereafter referred as “the Project”). The Waesano
Geothermal Exploration Project is one of several projects planned by the Government to facilitate the
exploration phase and deliver data to the market on exploitable geothermal resources. The activities would be
carried out to accelerate renewable energy development in Indonesia and to promote sustainable development
in the energy sector.
3. Following the Project plan to seek funding from the World Bank, AECOM was previously commissioned to
develop an Abbreviated (Preliminary) Land Acquisition and Resettlement Action Plan (LARAP) to meet the
World Bank requirements for managing land acquisition and involuntary resettlement, as has been adopted
by SMI in its GEUDP Environmental and Social Management Framework (ESMF) for Geothermal Energy
Upstream Development Project, which includes Resettlement Policy Framework (RPF). Since during that time
the Project is still at the design stage and detailed information regarding the required land for its development
was not yet available, the Preliminary LARAP as part of the ESIA document was developed as an initial
assessment based on general information without directly consulting with the project affected people. It was
agreed with the World Bank that the LARAP would be updated at a later stage of the Project once the
requirements of land and location for each of the Project facilities had been confirmed.
4. In July 2018 the Project conducted a cadastral survey and land ownership boundary assessment on the
confirmed Project location. Cadastral mesurement was conducted by cencus involving the owners of affected
assets and accompanied by village staff, measuring boundary of land to be used for project and inventory non-
land assets on the affected land. AECOM was recommissioned to undertake the update LARAP, the inventory
of losses refer to cadastral measurement result and a socio-economic household survey to the affected
households. Further discussion on this report’s objectives, scope of land acquisition and resettlement, as well
as approach and study limitations are provided in the following sections.
1.2. Scope of LARAP
5. This LARAP is prepared by referring to the final design for:

 Project area (well pad and supporting facilities: base camp, drilling water treatment facility, contractor
camp and spoil d
 isposal area)
 Widening of the district road to project area, in which there will be widening in 23 spots of the road for
the mobilization of the heavy vehicles and materials.
Specifically, this LARAP ensures that the land acquisition will be avoided, minimized, mitigated or compensated
through the process of social assessment as part of the environmental and social impact assessment. PT SMI
will refer to the requirements of the GoI regulation and World Bank OP 4.12 on Involuntary Resettlement as set
up in the RPF (of the ESMF) to avoid, remedy or mitigate the impacts as part of this process
LARAP
1
1.3. Report Structure
6. This LARAP is structured as follows:
 Section 1: Introduction of the report, background; objectives and report structure;
 Section 2: Description of the Project and overview of the land requirements as part of project description
for the current exploration stage;
 Section 3: Potential Impacts identified the scope of area and land required for the Project development;
 Section 4: Census of the Project Affected Persons (Project Affected People) discusses the general
approach and desktop review and household census for undertaking the LARAP study, including activities
conducted when developing the Preliminary report, baseline information of the affected people, including
their household characteristics, economic situation and livelihood, land status and land tenure system,
and perception;
 Section 5: Legal Analysis provides the regulatory framework and applicable standards used for the Project
to procure land for the current exploration stage;
 Section 6: Project Entitlement, Assistance and Beneficial Measures describes the confirmed scope and
process of land acquisition and resettlement specific for the current exploration stage of the Project;
 Section 7: description of procedure and mechanism followed for the valuation of assets and calculation of
compensation;
 Section 8: Consultation, Participation and Information Disclosure describes historical stakeholder

engagement undertaken to date, and recommendation for future and ongoing stakeholder engagement of
theLARAP implementation;
 Section 9: Organisational Arrangement and Responsibilities presents organisational arrangement and

responsibilities for different schemes of land acquisition and resettlement processes on main facilities and
road widening;
 Section 10: Implementation Schedule provides indicated time schedule for the LARAP implementation;
 Section 11: Cost and Budget reports on the estimated cost and budget to procure the land as well as to
implement livelihood restoration;
 Section 12: Grievance Redress Mechanism includes the Project grievance mechanism to handle
grievances associated with the land acquisition implementation; and
 Section 13: Monitoring and Reporting describes the Project plan for undertaking regular monitoring of the
land acquisition process and livelihood restoration of the affected people.
LARAP
2
2. Description of the Project
2.1. Project Status
7. The Waesano Geothermal Exploration Project is intended to facilitate investments in geothermal energy and
to provide technical assistance and capacity building for geothermal exploration. The focus of the Project will
be on the geothermal power development market on Flores Island, where electrification rates are lowest,
poverty rates are highest and electricity generation is heavily reliant on diesel. Investing in geothermal power
is expected to have long-term benefits for Indonesia’s sustainable development, electricity generation
diversification and energy security.
8. To utilise geothermal energy, production wells are drilled down into the heated water contained within the
Earth's crust - the geothermal reservoir. Once these geothermal reservoirs are tapped into, the heated water
and steam rise to the surface where the steam is separated and used to power steam turbines, which then
generate mechanical energy that can be harnessed as electricity. Brine and condensate are returned via
reinjection wells back to the geothermal reservoir.
9. The Project’s name under some reports is referenced as The Waesano Geothermal Exploration Project2, while
the Sano Nggoang name is used in other documents such as the Spatial Planning of Manggarai Barat Regency
as well as some segments of the Screening Report. The name of Waesano3refers to the name of the village
where the project was first initiated, while Sano Nggoang is the name of the lake, which is also used as the
name of the village and sub-district. Although both “Waesano” and “Sano Nggoang” are used interchangeably
in the references, this document will use “Waesano” as the name of the project.
10. The Waesano Project will cover the exploration phase of geothermal development, including permitting and
field survey, land acquisition, workforce recruitment, land clearing and preparation, equipment and material
mobilization, access road improvement, infrastructure and well pad development, exploration drilling, well
testing, site closure, and site restoration and revegetation. The Project is still in the planning phase and layouts
and operations may change according to the ongoing evaluation. Currently, the exploration activities will be
carried out within a maximum area of 1.5 ha for the slimhole drilling well pad and 2.5 ha for a standard drilling
well pad, with the depth of each well reaching 1,500 – 2,500 meters. The exploration activities will be divided
into Phase 1 and Phase 2. Phase 1 will include three slimhole drillings selected at Well Pad A, B, or E. The
scope of activities in Phase 2 will include one standard hole drilling at any selected well pad after Phase 1 is
completed. Alternative locations for well pads have been prepared to anticipate potential Project change. The
estimated total land requirement for project development is presented in Section 2.3.2.
11. It is understood that geothermal exploitation is a separate development phase that will not be part of the
Waesano Geothermal Exploration project. The nature and scale of the exploitation phase is not well
understood at the time of the preparation of this LARAP. If the drilling concludes that the geothermal resource
is sufficient for energy production, and there is sufficient demand for additional electricity generation on Flores,
the resource could be developed. This development will occur beyond the life of the Waesano Geothermal
Exploration project. Land acquisition is included as one of project activities for the exploitation phase.
2.2. Project Location

12. The Waesano Geothermal Exploration Project is primarily located in Waesano Village in Sano Nggoang Sub-
district, Manggarai Barat Regency of East Nusa Tenggara Province, Indonesia. This includes the proposed 4
well pads areas of WS-A, B, D, and E, and main facilities. The total size of the proposed geothermal exploration
activity is approximately 10 km2 situated in the area surrounding Lake Sano Nggoang, a 2.5 km diameter
sulfuric crater lake in the center of Mount Waesano, on the southwest corner of Flores Island. The
2
Terms of Reference for Waesano Project, RFP, 2016; GEUDP Social and Environmental Safeguards Screening of Potential
Sites for Geothermal Development in Eastern Indonesia – Screening Report for Waesano, March 2016
3
According to Central Bureau of Statistics (Badan Pusat Statistik), the written form of the village name uses 2 words –
“Waesano”. The name of the geothermal project will use “Waesano” as one word.
LARAP
3
Projectlocation map is shown in Figure 2-1 below.
13. Although the location is only about 35 km east of Labuan Bajo, the capital of Manggarai Barat Regency,
because of poor road conditions in the last 23 km to the site, it takes around two to three hours to reach the
project location. The asphalt road from Labuan Bajo to Wae Lolos, the entry point to Werang, which is the
capital of Sano Nggoang Sub-district, is in good condition, though there are some potholes found on the road
from Wae Lolos to Werang. The road from Werang to the lake is in poor condition.
14. Waesano Village is connected by Trans Flores Road from Labuan Bajo Port to the main Manggarai Barat
district road, and local village access road. The main road (Trans Flores Highway) is an asphalt road that is
38 km and 6m wide; the existing local access road connecting main road and project site is also an asphalt
road at 23 km and 2 m wide. Some upgrading and road widening work is planned along these roads to allow
transporting drilling rig and its supporting equipment.
LARAP
4
Figure 2-1Proposed Waesano Project Exploration Facilities
LARAP
5
3. Potential Impacts
3.1. Project Components Require Land
15. The footprints for the well pads, base camp, drilling water treatment facility, contractor camp and spoil disposal
area for the Project are located in Lempe, Nunang and Dasak Sub-villages of Waesano Village, Sano Nggoang
Sub-district, Manggarai Barat Regency. In addition, since the local roads cannot accommodate project traffic
without substantial upgrades and due to the fact that project traffic has the potential to impact community
amenities and safety, the project will involve road improvement and construction of several bridges, a new
district road bypass as well as several districtroads widening efforts.
16. The list of the Project exploration facilities that require land area acquisition is as follows, as reported in the
Final Cadastral Survey (Land Ownership Survey, conducted by Jacobs) Report (also seen in Figure 3-1):
 Well pad WS-A (slim hole) and WS-A (standard hole), including Laydown Area, Civil Contractor Camp,
Spoil Disposal Area No. 3, and Drilling Water Treatment Area 1;
 Well pad WS-B (slim hole) and WS-B (standard hole), including Construction Laydown Area;
 Well pad WS-D (slim hole) and WS-D (standard hole), including Spoil Disposal Area No. 1, and New
Bypass of District Road to Well pad WS-D (slim hole);
 Well pad WS-E (slim hole) and WS-E (standard hole), including Spoil Disposal Area No. 2 and District
Road to Well Pad WS-D;
 Drilling Base Camp Area (slim hole) and Drilling Base Camp Area (standard hole), include Drilling Water
Treatment Area 2 and Road Junction to Well pad WS-D and Drilling Water Treatment Area 2;
 Spoil Disposal Area No. 4, Spoil Disposal No. 5, and Spoil Disposal No. 6;
 Cut and filled at Km 27.4 Trans Flores Public Road; and
 Existing District Road widening at STA 0+740, STA 1+300, STA 2+050, STA 2+450, STA 3+820, STA
5+500, STA 5+580, STA 6+590, STA 6+730, STA 7+080 to STA 7+280, STA 7+370, STA 10+430, STA
12+640, STA 12+690, STA 17+420, STA 17+660, STA 18+830, STA 19+000, and STA 21+350.
17. The total area for the proposed well pads and supporting facilities is approximately 17.76 hectares, with a total
of 123 affected land parcels. The details of each area are provided in Table 3-1.
Table 3-1Land Requirement
Estimated Area of Affected

Project Facilities Land Requirement Land Parcels
(m2)*
Well pad WS-A (slim hole and standard hole), Laydown Area, Civil 44,253.923 27
Contractors Camp, and Spoil Disposal Area No. 3
Drilling Water Treatment Area 1 2,165.547 3
Well pad WS-B (slim hole and standard hole) and Laydown Area 28,446.089 27
Well pad WS-D (slim hole and standard hole) 23,909.36 1
Spoil Disposal Area No. 1 11,239.86 2
New Bypass Road to WS-D (STA 1+100) 1,738.66 1
Well pad WS-E (slim hole and standard hole) and Spoil Disposal Area 33,460.45 8
No. 2
Drilling Base Camp Area (slim hole and standard hole) 8,351.914 6
Drilling Water Treatment Area 2 2,415.165 1
LARAP
6
Estimated Area of Affected
Project Facilities Land Requirement Land Parcels
(m2)*
Road Junction to Drilling Water Treatment Area 2 and to Well pad WS-D 820.237 3
Public Road upgraded to WS-D (STA 0+330) 266.983 1
Public Road upgraded to WS-D (STA 0+700) 667.187 1
Existing Trans Flores Public Road widening at KM 27.4 317.690 1
Existing Public Road widening at STA 0+740 112.063 1
Existing Public Roads widening at STA 1+300 495.381 2
Existing Public Roads widening at STA 7+080 to STA 7+280 617.838 5
TOTAL 177,558.43 123
Source: Final Land Ownership Survey Report (Jacobs, September 2018)
*The estimated area is taken from cadastral survey drawings based on current landownership status. The West Manggarai
Land Office (BPN Kabupaten Manggarai Barat) will conduct detailed measurement of affected assets to be used as final
reference for payment.
18. For the next stage, the exploitation phase, the geothermal power plant operation will require land acquisition
for the main facility including the power house, operation control room, cooling tower, steam pipelines, access
road and supporting facilities including a switchyard, transmission line, etc. The power plant will require a
maximum of 1 ha, irrespective of the generation technology selected (binary plant normally has a larger
footprint than condensing steam plant, but either should fit within this 1 ha area). It is most likely that access
will be by extension from an existing well pad and, given the rugged topography, this will require approximately
3 km of new road to be constructed. This, however, will only be confirmed once the Project exploration phase
is completed. A separate LARAP will be prepared for any acquired land or other assets needed if exploitation
is proposed.
LARAP
7
Figure 3-1Waesano Exploration Project Area of Interest (AOI) and Social Impact Zone
LARAP
8
3.2. Scope of Impacts
19. Data of PAPs and their losses mentioned in this LARAP refer to cadastral measurement result. The cadastral
mesurement was carried out to determine boundary of area needed for project area, including access road.
The cadastral survev was conducted by cencus involved the owner of affected assets and accompanied by
village staff, measured boundary of land to be used for project and inventory of non-land asset on the affected
land. Measurement of land by cadastral will be verified by District National Land Office (BPN) of West Manggarai
District, an agency who has authority to issue formal land measurement result. Verificarion by BPN also carried
out to ensure that the affected land is free from any ownership dispute.The verification result by BPN will be
used as a reference for eligibility for payment of compensation of the affected land for road widening and leasing
for the affected land in main project area.
20. An socio economic households survey was carried out by AECOM in September 2018 to get information on the
land ownership status and socio economic condition of PAPs in order to determine severity and vulnerability of
PAPs. Socio economic household survey was conducted to 68 of 82 (83%) of PAPs, the other 14 PAPs were
not available during the time of survey.
21. According to the cadastral measurement and socio economic households survey it was identified a total of 82
project affected peoples who owned 123 parcel of land, 1 communal land and 4 village land will be affected by
project. Of 62 PAPs from the total 82 PAPs will be temporary affected by well pad and project facilities, while
remaining 20 PAPs will be permanently affected or acquired for widening of access road. Table 3-2providesthe
summary of scope of impacts.
Table 3-2 Scope of Impacts
Quantityfor Each Activity
Loss of Asset/PAPs Unit
Well pad and supporting Road Widening
facilities
Total affected land (temporary loss) parcels 88 35
m2 170,872.88 6,685.55
Project Affected Peoples Male HH 55 20

Female HH 7 0
Forestry Land parcels 3 0
m2 26,315.21 0
Communal Land parcels 1 0
m2 909.76
Village Government Land parcels 3 1
m2 531.07 237,90
Sharecroppers Male HH 3 2
Female HH 0 0
Affected secondary structures (i.e. hut)

Male HH 6 0
- Affected PAPs Female HH 0
0
- Affected structures hut unit 6 0
- Affected large area m2 38 0
Affected plants:
Trees/Timbers tree/plant number 4,460 39
Fruit Trees tree/plant number 1,291 43
Annual harvested plantation tree/plant number 9,645 13
Crops tree/plant number 7,986 2
Vulnerable PAPs*:
- Women people/ HH 6 1
- Elderly people/ HH 10 0
- Women head of household people/ HH 5 0
LARAP
9
- Elderly head of household people/ HH 7 2
- Poor people/ HH 31 3
Severely impacted PAPs*:
- 10% or above loss of land people/ HH 43 0
- 10% or above loss of income people/ HH 43 3
Source: Final Land Ownership Survey Report (Jacobs, September 2018)
3.3. Vulnerable People

22. Some parties, identified as vulnerable parties, will be more affected by the Project land acquisition due to their
current circumstances. The following categories of vulnerability were assessed according to cadastral
measurement and socio economic household survey.
 Women head of household – among the identified female land owners, 5 women are head of household;
 Elderly head of household – among the identified elderly, 9 people are head of household; and
 Poverty identified from low welfare level –34 of PAPs living below the regional poverty line.
3.4. Severely PAPs

23. Severely PAPs refer to affected persons who will (i) lose 10% or more of their total productive assets, (ii) have
to relocate, and/or (iii) lose 10% or more of their total income sources due to the project. According to cadastral
cencus and socio economic households survey, it was identified severely PAPs are as follow :
 43 people experience 10% or above loss of land – this is defined through comparing the total household
land ownership with the loss of land affected by the Project; and
 46 people experience 10% or above loss of income – this is defined through comparing the income
generated from the affected productive agricultural land against the total household income. Of note,
not all of the affected land is planted with productive plants therefore some generated income less than
the others, while some PAPs depend on the affected land for their household income, resulting to
significant loss of income i.e. 10% or above.
Table 3-3 below are presented detailed vulnerable and severly PAPs, while detailed name of PAPs and their losses
are presented in table 3-4.
3.5. Sharecroppers
24. The LARAP study identified five affected PAPs who cultivate their fields with the help of sharecroppers, as
follows:
 Land owned by Serpatius Senaman, whose land will be affected by well pad WS-B;
 Land owned by Paulus Din, whose land will be affected by well pad WS-B;
 Land owned by Flavianus Wely Daud, whose land will be affected by well pad WS-E;
 Land owned by Antonius Suhardi, whose land will be affected by road widening; and
 Land owned by Damianus Ndalung, whose land will be affected by road widening.
However, of note as identified from the ESIA and Preliminary LARAP, generally sharecroppers work on multiple
land areas to meet their household needs. Therefore, the temporary land and income loss is not likely to
significantly impact them. Confirmation of sharecroppers’ data will need to be conducted during the ATR/BPN
Verification PAPs data, which is planned to be conducted prior to land compensation payment
LARAP
10
Table 3-3.Vulnerable and Severely PAPs
Vulnerable Category Severely Impacted Category

No Name Women Elderly 10% or above
10% or above
Head of Head of Poor loss of
loss of land
Household Household income
Fianus Daud (Flavianus Wely √
1. √
Daud)
2. Petrus Lapur √
3. Yohanes Krisostomus Purnama √ √ √
4. Yusup Usma √ √ √
5. Florianus Sonjo √ √
6. Sisilia Nawun √ √ √ √
7. Stefanus Rabu √ √ √
8. Usman Sidik √ √
9. Hendrikus Habur √ √
10. Arnoldus Viktor Terang √ √
11. Siprianus Sudarti √ √
12. Anastasia Anu √ √ √ √
13. Donatus Hana √ √ √
14. Ismail Sion √ √ √

Kristina Keros (a/n Petrus √
15. √
Samat)
16. Martinus Madur √ √ √
17. Yohanes Bechemans Pedo √ √
18. Maksimus Mal √
19. Tinus Baru √ √ √
20. Marhaul √ √ √
21. Eduardus F.H.W. Medang √
22. Yohanes (Ian) Harung √ √
23. Nikolaus Olen √ √ √
24. Martinus Maksi √ √
25. Fransiskus Toka Mose √
Maria Margarita Muen √

26. (Martianus Madur in Jacob √
Report)
27. Afentinus Swardi √ √ √
28. Marselus Sambul √ √
29. Frederikus Janu √ √ √
30. Damasius Daman √ √
31. Alosyus Huladarma √ √
32. Mateus Aku √ √ √
33. Yusup Saban √ √
34. Andreas Jebarus √ √
35. Mustami √ √
LARAP
11
Vulnerable Category Severely Impacted Category
No Name Women Elderly 10% or above
10% or above
Head of Head of Poor loss of
loss of land
Household Household income
36. Maksimus Hambur √ √
37. Aloysius Datut √ √ √
38. Markus Masi √ √ √
39. Nico Gego √ √ √
40. Damianus Daud (Damidau) √ √
41. Yosep Ance √ √ √
42. Belasius Sijaga √ √
43. Serpatius Senaman √
44. Siprianus Jalu √ √
45. Raimundus Rabu √ √
46. Maria Mia √
47. Valentinus Emang √ √
48. Yoseph Erwin Rahmat √ √
49. Kanis Hola √
50. Sisi Nalus √ √
51. Tomas Turuk √ √ √
52. Adrianus Handu √ √ √
53. Andrianus Stefani √
54. Yosep Subi √ √
55. Nikolaus Ambuk √ √
56. Damianus Ndalung √ √
57. Yohanes Aben √ √
58. Aloysius Sahu √ √
59. Maria Mia √ √ √
60. Paulus Din √
61. Petrus Samat √
62. Sirilus Hamsi √
63. Bernadus Jemalu √
Source: LARAP Study, 2018
LARAP
12
Table 3-4 List ofProject Affected Peoples (PAPs)
Total % of
No Affected Land % of
Land Affected for Development Household Affected Affected
ID Land Owner Land Ownership Affected
of Project Facilities Large Area Structure Income*
Data (m2) Status Land*
(m2)*
WS-A/Laydown Area/Civil 35.48
1 Tadius Tahun (a/n Anastasia Anu) 2,939.77 SKBPT 5,600.00 - 52.50
Contractor
2 Eduardus F.H.W. Medang 1,370.79 SKBPT 1,371.00 - 99.98
Contractor
3 Fransiskus Toka Mose 1,858.00 SKBPT 3,600.00 - 51.61
Contractor
4 Nico Gego 4,112.00 SKBPT 11,480.00 - 35.82
Contractor
WS-A/Laydown Area/Civil
5 Alosyus Huladarma Contractor, Water Treatment 1, 13,321.11 SKBPT 22,810.00 - 58.40 5.05
Drilling Camp
Water Treatment 1 & Drilling 0.01
6 Frans Ama 348.23 SKBPT 65,000.00 - 0.54
Camp
7 Yohanes (Ian) Harung Water Treatment 1 3,335.07 SKBPT 3,335.00 - 100.00 44.57
8 Yoseph Erwin Rahmat Drilling Camp 953.09 SKBPT 13,680.00 - 6.97 88.53
- 41.59
9 Donatus Hana Drilling Camp 3,454.29 SKBPT 11,455.00 30.16
10 Yohanes Bechemans Pedo Drilling Camp 1,915.93 SKBPT 10,526.44 - 18.20 22.20
- 52.00
11 Kanis Hola Drilling Camp 152.70 SKBPT 2,000.00 7.64
12 Tinus Baru Drilling Camp 323.27 SKBPT 1,188.25 - 27.21 25.54
13 Marhaul Drilling Camp 1,662.64 SKBPT 3,912.00 - 42.50 72.07
14 Nikolaus Olen Drilling Camp 1,864.00 No doc 1,864.00 - 100.00 90.57
15 Afentinus Swardi Drilling Camp 1,866.27 SKBPT 1,866.00 - 100.00 89.35
- 26.06
16 Adrianus Handu Drilling Camp 247.01 SKBPT 7,100.00 3.48
17 Marselus Sambul Drilling Camp 437.12 SKBPT 437.12 - 100.00 100.00
LARAP
13
Total % of
(m2)*
18 Frederikus Janu Drilling Camp 4,003.51 SKBPT 10,000.00 - 40.04 93.02
19 Mateus Aku Drilling Camp 375.18 SKBPT 525.00 - 71.46 56.02
20 Damianus Daud (Damidau) Drilling Camp 2,389.35 SKBPT 20,000.00 - 11.95 8.74
- 14.96
21 Yosep Ance Drilling Camp 2,848.26 SKBPT 8,500.00 33.51
22 Belasius Sijaga Drilling Camp 1,423.38 SKBPT 5,720.00 - 24.88 27.05
- 0.57
23 Aleksander Lambut WS-B 47.32 No doc 2,100.00 2.25
11,625.00 - 76.56
24 Siprianus Jalu WS-B 912.38 SKBPT 7.85
1,954.00
1,954.00 - 0.00
25 Petrus Lapur WS-B 1,094.69 SKBPT 56.02
3,800.00
3,800.00 - 76.86
26 Yohanes Krisostomus Purnama WS-B 1,890.71 SKBPT 49.76
14,300.00
27 Raimundus Rabu WS-B 410.00 SKBPT 14,300.00 - 2.87 16.87
28 Paulus Din WS-B 77.00 SKBPT 4,600.00 - 1.67 48.90
- 53.83
29 Hendrikus Habur WS-B 829.77 SKBPT 3,900.00 21.28
30 Arnoldus Viktor Terang WS-B 3,000.80 SKBPT 7,360.00 - 40.77 47.34
No -
31 Maria Mia WS-B 331.11 documentati 10,900.00 3.04 53.66
on
- 12.27
32 Valentinus Emang WS-B 378.92 SKBPT 4,600.00 8.24
- 52.13
33 Kristina Keros (a/n Petrus Samat) WS-B 7,999.00 SKBPT 12,003.24 66.64
34 Martinus Madur WS-B 926.42 SKBPT 1,301.42 - 71.19 21.19
35 Maksimus Mal WS-B 5,222.00 SKBPT 8,220.00 - 63.53 2.76
LARAP
14
Total % of
(m2)*
36 Agus Jamu WS-B 104.73 SKBPT 5,101.48 - 2.05 0.00
Maria Margarita Muen (Martianus - 81.82

37 WS-B 1,130.87 SKBPT 1,630.92 69.34
Madur in Jacob Report)
- 23.97
38 Tomas Turuk WS-B 132.82 SKBPT 3,034.00 4.38
39 Sisi Nalus WS-B 265.08 No doc 3,200.00 - 8.28 49.08
- 8.68
40 Martinus Maksi WS-B 4,049.69 No doc 21,800.00 18.58
41 Damasius Daman WS-B 868.13 SKBPT 3,900.00 - 22.26 9.24
42 Bene Banu WS-B 592.71 SKBPT 23,500.00 - 2.52 4.12
- 0.00
43 Serpatius Senaman WS-B 8,311.84 SKBPT 46,570.00 17.85
1 unit of
Fianus Daud (Flavianus Wely 0.00
44 WS-E & Spoil Disposal 2 3,435.48 SKBPT 4,000.00 plantation 85.89
Daud)
hut (6 m2)
1 unit of
85.34
45 Yusup Usma WS-E & Spoil Disposal 2 10,549.13 No doc 15,001.75 plantation 70.32
hut (8 m2)
1 unit of
plantation 94.02
46 Usman Sidik WS-E & Spoil Disposal 2 6,357.15 SKBPT 6,357.00 100.00
hut
(.6..m2)
1 unit of
47 Siprianus Sudarti WS-E & Spoil Disposal 2 4,071.94 SKBPT 12,071.94 plantation 33.73 25.46
hut(.6 m2)
6.64
48 Ismail Sion WS-E & Spoil Disposal 2 3,453.98 SKBPT 19,943.00 - 17.32
1 unit of
WS-E & Spoil Disposal 2, Road 89.41
49 Florianus Sonjo 5,859.75 SKBPT 5,958.24 plantation 98.35
STA 0+330
hut (6 m2)
1 unit of
50 Stefanus Rabu Water Treatment 2 2,704.33 No doc 2,705.16 plantation 99.97 16.87
hut (6 m2)
LARAP
15
Total % of
(m2)*
51 Sirilus Hamsi Water Treatment 2 531.07 SKBPT 8,000.00 - 6.64 3.45
52 Yusup Saban Spoil Disposal 4 1,724.54 SKBPT 6,000.00 - 28.74 6.11
53 Andreas Jebarus Spoil Disposal 4 928.59 SKBPT 4,920.00 - 18.87 59.59
54 Mustami Spoil Disposal 4 1,142.83 SKBPT 2,550.00 - 44.82 87.73
55 Maksimus Hambur Spoil Disposal 4 1,321.37 SKBPT 12,430.00 - 10.63 61.87
56 Selerinus Sedan Endon Spoil Disposal 4 178.93 SKBPT 10,850.00 - 1.65 6.15
57 Aloysius Datut Spoil Disposal 5 1,076.81 SKBPT 4,000.00 - 26.92 27.83
58 Markus Masi Spoil Disposal 5 2,339.51 SKBPT 8,750.00 - 26.74 80.71
59 Andrianus Stefani Spoil Disposal 5 295.00 SKBPT 7,416.00 - 3.98 83.63
60 Sisilia Nawun Spoil Disposal 6 5,064.25 SKBPT 17,118.95 - 29.58 57.35
61 Yosep Subi Road Widening 48.86 SKBPT 11,650.00 - 0.42 27.54
62 Antonius Hardi Road Widening 295.32 SKBPT 12,750.00 - 2.32 8.54
63 Bernadus Jemalu Road Widening 114.47 SKBPT 16,500.00 - 0.69 0.27
64 Nikolaus Ambuk Road Widening 105.85 SKBPT 7,376.00 - 1.44 18.38
65 Damianus Ndalung Road Widening 114.34 SKBPT 34,050.00 - 0.34 32.84
66 Yohanes Aben Road Widening 95.16 SKBPT 15,000.00 - 0.63 42.38
67 Aloysius Sahu Road Widening 409.13 SKBPT 38,125.00 - 1.07 29.13
68 Ali Saedun Road Widening 112.06 SKBPT 20,000.00 - 0.56 2.09
Source: Final Land Ownership Survey Report (Jacob, September 2018) and Socio Economic Household Survey conducted during preparation of LARAP, excluded 14 PAPs which could not be interviewed
LARAP
16
4. Socio EconomicHousehold Survey of the
Project Affected Persons
25. As mentioned in the previous chapter, socio economic household survey baseline information gathering
pertaining to the use of the affected land through questionnaire interviews to the affected households,
undertaken from 19 – 29 August 2018 (questionnaire form is attached in Appendix A).The current survey was
focusing more on socio economic survey for each affected household to seek out recent perceptions and
acceptance toward the planned land acquisition, as well as identifying some potential problems with
overlapping land ownership issues.
26. Some study limitations were experienced during the development of this report:
 Socio-economic survey of the affected people was undertaken on 19 – 29 August 2018 based on land
ownership information provided by SMI in the Draft Land Ownership Survey Report of 16 August 2018.
Land ownership data for some of the facilities (including for WS-E, drilling camp, soil disposal 5, and road
widening) were not confirmed yet prior to the site visit, and therefore there are some differences in the
final number of affected people. The Final Report of Land Ownership was received on 3 September 2018;
 In the case where the affected people were not at home during the census period, one of the household
members present at home (e.g. wife or adult son (age 18 years or more)) was interviewed instead – there
were five (5) cases of this; and
 One (1) person (i.e. Serpatius Senaman whose land will be affected for Well Pad WS-B) was travelling
out of town, so was interviewed through a phone call, and therefore could only provide limited information
27. Considering that limitation, socio economic survey was conducted to 68 of 82 (83%) of PAPs, while remaining
14 PAPs was not available to interview during the time of survey was conducted. Detailed measurement
survey (DMS) will be conducted by West Manggarai District Land Office (Kantor ATR/BPN Kabupaten
Manggarai Barat) in order to verify measurement of affected land, identification and inventory of non-land asset
affected and ensure that each plot of land is free from any ownership dispute.The owners of the land and other
affected assets will be involved during DMS.The DMS results will be used as final reference for compensation
and leasing payment.
4.1. Stakeholder Interview and Households Socio Economic Surveyof the PAPs
28. Most of the stakeholder consultations have been conducted during the Preliminary LARAP Study. Results of
the consultation has been included in the Preliminary LARAP Report (March 2018), and Stakeholder
Engagement Plan/ SEP (June 2018). The additional stakeholder interviews was undertaken with the Head of
Sano Nggoang Sub-district, Head of Waesano Village, and customary leaders (see Table 4-1) below
Table 4-1Stakeholders Interview during LARAP Study
Date of
No Stakeholders Key Discussion Notes
Interview
Discussion on the planned land acquisition which has been

1 Tu’a Golo Lempe 21 August 2018 acknowledged by the affected people in Ta’al and
communication with Tu’a Golo.
Discussion on the planned land acquisition which has

2 Tu’a Golo Ta’al 25 August 2018 been acknowledged by the affected people in Ta’al and
communication with Tu’a Golo.
3 Confirming land ownership status of one of the affected

Tu’a Golo Nunang 26 August 2018 land parcels under the name of Martianus Madur,
however originally owned by Marita Muen (his cousin),
LARAP
17
Date of
No Stakeholders Key Discussion Notes
Interview
and historical patrilineal land inheritance system in

Waesano that has been faded.
Discussion regarding objection from some of the
community members toward the Project activities due to
e.g. increased presence of non-locals with different
culture and belief.
Tu’a Golo stated that for the matter of land acquisition,
the Village Head had no authority because land
ownership was an individual right. The authority of the
village head is only about administration, while for matters
related to customary matters is the authority of Tu’a Golo.
Tu’a Golo expressed his support for this Project and
requested that each stage of the activities carried out to
be coordinated with Tu’a Golo.
Concern on the Project as planned, including

4 Head of Waesano Village 26 August 2018 environmental impacts from the well pads’ activities to
nearby communities.
Discussion on community’s concerns about different

information perceived by local communities from different
5 Head of Lempe Sub-Village 27 August 2018 sources regarding the Project impacts. There is further
the expectation for future village development with the
Project presence.
Understanding of the common process that is normally

conducted to procure land for public interest development
Head of Sano Nggoang such as road widening and improvement, and suggestion
6 27 August 2018
District for the Project to as soon as possible conduct a
socialization meeting to explain the road widening plan to
the affected people to obtain their approval.
4.2. Overview on the Result of Households Socio Economic Survey

29. The Project area of interest includes land that is owned individually by the local community, who are of
Manggaraian ethnicity. Specifically, in Waesano Village, the locals identify themselves as the Mata Wae
community, a sub-ethnic group of the Manggarai people, with a clear territory (hamente) within the Sano
Nggoang region and its surroundings. They generally have the same identity and traditions as other sub-ethnic
groups in Manggarai. What distinguishes them is that they have dialects and some unique traditions. In
particular they recognize themselves as Mata Wae people, which is a different identity from the larger
Manggarai community. This indicates that the identity of local community of Waesano Village as Mata Wae is
very strong part of their identity. For example, they acknowledge that as Mata Wae they have a special area
called hamente Mata Wae, with is their ancestor or old village (kampong) areas. In some local stories they
have mentioned that they never left Sano Nggoang lake areas and its surrounding vicinity. Thus, the area of
Mata Wae people is special within the area of Lake Sano Nggoang. Despite of this story, there is no specific
different between this Mata Wae people with the rest of the community in the project area and are integrated
well as Manggaraian people. The Project will also impact communities outside Waesano Village, especially
landowners along the main road where road widening locations will require a land acquisition process. In
general, the characteristics of the community are similar to those in the Waesano community.
30. Of note, according to the Final Land Ownership Survey (received on 3 September 2018) most of the land
ownership status is based on Letter of Land Ownership Reference (SKBPT) acknowledged by Head of Village.
However, the LARAP survey also identified that most of land owners paid tax over their land; therefore, has
the evidence of tax payment letter (SPPT) as another evidence of their ownership right toward the land
LARAP
18
4.3. .Demographic Characteristic of PAPs
4.3.1. Age and Gender Distribution

31. Of the 68 PAPs censused, about 83.33% of PAPswho’s affected of Wellpad and Main Facilities are in a
productive age group of 15 – 64 years old and about 16.67% are above 64 years old (non-productive age
group) (Table 4-2). A productive age indicates that landowners still have the potential to be employed by the
project as compensation for the loss of land caused by the project.
Table 4-2Age of PAPs
PAPs
No Age Category Well pads and main Road Widening %
%
facilities
1 <15 0 0.00 0 0.00
2 15 – 64 50 83.33 6 75.00
3 >64 10 16.67 2 25.00

Source: LARAPField Survey, 2018
Table 4-3. Gender of PAPs
PAPs
No Gender Well pads and Road %
%
main facilities Widening
1 Male 52 86.67 8 100
2 Female 8 13.33 0 0
Source: LARAPField Survey, 2018
32. About 86.67% of PAPs who are affected by the wellpads and/or main facilities are male (Table 4-3). While
there are few female PAPs, they will also have a voice to negotiate for land compensation, with careful attention
paid to vulnerable peoples. All those affected people by road widening aremale.
4.3.2. Education
33. The education background of the PAPs is summarised in Table 4-4. Of all the landowners who have been
interviewed, only 1 person had never attended school and the majority were elementary school graduates.
This means that almost all PAPs can read, indicating they are able to be directly involved in the process of
land acquisition, specifically related to the articles in the agreement letter between the project owner
(government) and the affected landowner.
Table 4-4Education Level per Gender Category

PAPs
Well pads and main facilities Road widening
No Education Level
Grand Grand
Male Female % Male Female %
Total Total
1 Elementary school 25 7 32 53.33 4 0 4 50.00
2 Junior high school 10 0 10 16.67 1 0 1 12.50
3 Senior high school 11 0 11 18.33 2 0 2 25.00
4 University 6 0 6 10.00 1 0 1 12.50

Not graduating/ not
5 0 1 1 1.67 0 0 0 0.00
going to school
LARAP
19
4.4. Economic Condition and Livelihoods
34. Most people in Waesano Village work in the agricultural sector with more women than men working in this
field. The description of economic condition and livelihoods of landowners is presented in the following sub-
sections.
4.4.1. Livelihoods of the PAPs

35. Observation and interviews with local communities during the LARAPcensus identified that the majority of the
interviewed households are working as farmers as their primary livelihood (81.67% affected by wellpad and
75% affected by road widening). Only a few of them are working as private employees, government officials,
teachers, carpentersand entrepreneurs as the household’s main income source.This indicates that the
community has a strong livelihood connection to agricultural (plantation) land. However, the census also
identified that these community plantations are considered small-scale undeveloped plantations, still managed
traditionally within the family (i.e. minimum use of migrant laborers).
36. Further details regarding the PAPs livelihoods are presented in the following table:
Table 4-5 Occupation of the PAPs
PAPs
No Occupation Well pads and main Road
% %
facilities widening
1 Farmer 49 81.67 6 75
2 Private Employee 2 3.33 1 12.5
3 Government Official 3 5.00 0 0
4 Teacher 2 3.33 0 0
5 Retiree 2 3.33 0 0
6 Unemployed 1 1.67 0 0
7 Carpenter 1 1.67 0 0
8 Entrepreneur 0 0.00 1 12.5
Grand Total 60 100 8 100
37. As shown in Table 4-6, a total of 69% of land-owningfarmers who are affected by wellpad and/or main facilities
have primary education (53.33%) and junior high school (16.67%). Landowners withsenior high school and
university education levels work as farmers as well as other jobs, such as teachers, civil servants, retirees and
entrepreneurs. This is the same forpeople who are affected by the road widening.
38. From this data it can be assumed that the level of education influences the type of landowner's work.
The higher the level of education, the greater the opportunity to find a job other than farming. The long-term
plantation system also allows them to be able to work in other fields to meet the daily needs of the household.
LARAP
20
Table 4-6Education and Occupation of the PAPs Affected by Well Pad and Main Facilities
Occupation
Unemployed/
Entrepreneur
Not Working
Government
Employee/
Carpenter
Farmers
Teacher
Retiree
Official
Labour
Private
No Education Level Total %
1 Elementary school 31 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 32 53.33
2 Junior high school 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 16.67
3 Senior high school 7 1 2 0 0 0 1 0 11 18.33
4 University 0 0 1 2 2 0 0 0 5 8.33
Not graduating/ not

5 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 2 3.33
going to school
Total 49 2 3 2 2 1 1 0 60 100.00
Table 4-7. Education and Occupation of the PAPs Affected by Access Road Widening
Occupation
Unemployed/
Entrepreneur
Not Working
Government
Employee/
Carpenter
Farmers
Teacher
Retiree
Labour
Official
Private
No Education Level Total %
1 Elementary school 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 50
2 Junior high school 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 12.5
3 Senior high school 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 25
4 University 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 12.5
Not graduating/ not

5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
going to school
Total 6 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 8 100
39. In addition to landowners, other family members in the household also work to meet their daily needs.
The majority are still dependent on farming. Other jobs include private employees, teachers and civil servants.
Table 4-8. Livelihood of the Affected Household
PAPs
Livelihood of the Affected
No Well pads and main Road
Household % %
facilities widening
1 Farmer 111 64.53 14 60.87
2 Housewife 20 11.63 3 13.04
3 Private Employees 18 10.47 1 4.35
4 Unemployed 9 5.23 3 13.04
5 Teacher 4 2.33 1 4.35
LARAP
21
PAPs
Livelihood of the Affected
Household % %
facilities widening
Government Official (civil
6 5 2.91 0 0.00
servants)
7 Retiree 2 1.16 0 0.00
8 Lawyer 1 0.58 0 0.00
9 Driver 1 0.58 0 0.00
10 Carpenter 1 0.58 0 0.00
11 Entrepreneur 0 0.00 1 4.35
Grand Total 172 100 23 100
4.4.2. Land Tenure and Land Use

4.4.2.1. Land Tenure
40. In general, the social systems of the Manggarai community or Mata Wae people are deeply tied to their cultural
landscape. Land for Manggaraian, including the Mata Wae community, historically and culturally was very
important and considered part of their individual and communal identity, as the mother of the community and
source of life, and as a precondition for a village to exist. It is not only the land, but a cohesive system
comprised of settlement, communities, the natural environment, and the values that support it.
41. The land tenure system of Waesano communities is summarized as follow, while further detailed has been
provided in the Final ESIA Report (June, 2018) and Abbreviated (Preliminary) LARAP (March, 2018):
 Land ownership in Manggarai is generally known as Lodok, where the land and cultivation system are
integral to the neighborhood and settlement system called Golo (kampong), while each village has a
tenure system named Lingko, which is a communal land management system of each Golo.
 In the Lingko system, the land is divided equally by the Tu’a Golo (customary leader) to families who are
deemed capable of managing and cultivating the land. The division of each plot of land to the families will
form a spider web pattern.
 The land inheritance system is carried out based on a patrilineal pattern (the lineage comes from the
father) which is inherited by a son. But if there is only a single daughter, then the land is passed on to the
girl.
42. However, this traditional land tenure system has faded, and land is now owned by households on an
individual/private basis, particularly since the 1980s when national government encouraged land ownership to
be divided on a permanent ownership and cultivated land use. Therefore, the land rights are now permanently
owned by individuals. Formal land status is shown through a Village Head Reference Letter for Land
Ownership (Surat Keterangan Tanah or SKT) or tax letter indicates the Sale Value of Taxation Object (Nilai
Jual Obyek Pajak or NJOP) of the land.
43. The majority (65%) of affected landowners by well pad and main facilities have land area between
500 – 10,242 m2 (average land area), while 87.5% of people who are affected by road widening have more
than 10,454 m2(see table below). Only one landowner has land area under 500 m2. Ownership of land under
500 m2 is one of the poverty indicators issued by BPS (Central Bureau of Statistics).
LARAP
22
Table 4-9. Average Land Ownership Area
PAPs
Total area of agricultural and plantation
No land per household Well pads and main Road
(m2) % %
facilities widening
1 <500 m2 1 1.67 0 0.00

2 2
2 500 m - < 10,454 m (average land area) 39 65.00 1 12.50
3 > 10,454 m2 (average land area) 20 33.33 7 87.50
Grand Total 60 100.00 8 100.00
4.4.2.2. Land Use

44. The general overview of land use within the proposed Project footprint for each facility has been detailed in
the previousAbbreviated (Preliminary) LARAP (March 2018). This section will discuss land use information
specific for each of the affected land parcels.
45. Of note, community land use is for plantations because land contours and water sources do not support rice
farming. Most of the affected agricultural land uses within Waesano Village use rain fed systems; only a few
rice fields use irrigation systems, such as in the village of Wae Lolos which will be traversed by the road
widening. The average area of land ownership for each of these uses is presented in the following table.
Table 4-10. Average Land Ownership
Average Area of Land Ownership per each household (m2)

No Land Use
Well pads and main facilities Road widening
1 Paddy Field and Wet Land 748.66 2,359.38

2 Plantation land 8,508.68 17,072
Total land area per household 9,257.35 19,431.38
46. The land use within the proposed Project AOIis dominated by commercial crops such as candlenut, areca nut,
coffee, as well as various food crops that are grown locally and used for domestic household consumption
such as coconut, palm sugar, cacao, rice, corn, peanuts, soybean, and common vegetables such as chilli,
tomatoes, sweet potato, bananas, and cassava.
4.4.3. Level of Welfare

47. According to BPS (Central Bureau of Statistics of Manggarai Barat Regency, 2017), poor people are those
who have an average expenditure per capita per month below the poverty line. The level of welfare is assessed
by identifying income and expense.
48. The personal consumption expenses are shown in Table 4-11. The ranges of expense are divided by the
lowest, middle low, middle high and the highest expense. As identified by the Central Bureau of Statistics
(BPS), the lowest expense level based on the 2017 poverty line in Manggarai Barat Regency is IDR
304,277per capita, and the middle high range is IDR 1,481,772 per the 2014-2017 is the decent Standard of
Living in Manggarai Barat Regency by BPS.
49. The 2018 LARAP census results found that 50% of PAP personal expenses were less than IDR 304,277 per
capita per month; 75% of PAPs affected by road widening have expenses less than IDR 304,277 (Table 4-11).
Their monthly expenses are more than the basic standard of living in Manggarai Barat Regency. The largest
expenses are for education and social activities, such as traditional celebrations. Traditional wedding
celebrations commonly take a large portion of expenses. If a family holds a wedding celebration, then the
expenditure for the celebration is the obligation of their extended family (both rich and poor) and the amount
of donation is determined to be the same for all families.
LARAP
23
Table 4-11. Expenses per Capita
Personal Expenses PAP

No Well pads and Road
(IDR per months) % %
main facilities widening
1 < 304,277* 30 50 2 25
2 304,277 – 1,481,772** 30 50 6 75
3 >1,481,772 0 0 0 0
Grand Total 60 100 8 100

Notes:
* 2017 Poverty line of Manggarai Barat Regency
** 2014-2017 Decent Standard of Living (Kebutuhan Hidup Layak) of Manggarai Barat Regency
50. Income directly influences the allocation of family expenditure. Low income families will use most of their
income for food as a basic necessity (Suhardjo, 1989). According to Table 4-12, the majority of PAPs (about
90%) have personal income of less than the 2018 Provincial Minimum Wage of Nusa Tenggara Timur, i.e. IDR
1,660,000. About 70% of PAP households have income less that the 2017 poverty line of The World Bank
(about US$1.9 per day or approximately IDR 28,324.9 per day based on a rate of 1 dollar equals IDR14,908
as per 26th September 2018).
51. For personal income, most household’s income is less than IDR 849,747 per month per family member; thus,
most personal income is below the poverty line of The World Bank. A small number of household memberswho
are affected by the wellpads and/or main facilities (about 10%) have income that exceeds the 2018 Provincial
Minimum Wage of East Nusa Tenggara (see Table 4-12).
Table 4-12. Income per Capita
Personal Income PAPs

(IDR per months) % %
facilities widening
1 < 849,747* 42 70 5 62.50
2 849,747 – 1,660,000** 12 20 3 37.50
3 > 1,660,000 6 10 0 0.00
Grand Total 60 100 8 100.00

Notes:
* World Bank Poverty Line US$1.9/day in a month
** 2018 Provincial Minimum Wage of Nusa Tenggara Timur
52. In order to help the poor families, various social assistance programs have been implemented in the
community. Social assistance programs that have beengranted are described in the following table, per the
results from interviews and census with landowners.
Table 4-13Social Assistance Programs
PAP Average Total

Well pads Assistance per Assistance
No Assistance Program Road
and main % % Year (IDR) per Year
widening /per household (IDR)
facilities
Program Keluarga Harapan
1 23 30.67 2 20 1,716,000 42,900,000
(Family Hope Program)
LARAP
24
Prosperous Rice Program
2 16 21.33 2 20 897.222 16,150,000
(Rastra)
Personal Assistance/aid from

3 1 1.33 0 0 9,600,000 9,600,000
their children
Badan Penyelenggara
Jaminan Sosial 1.33
4 1 0 0 1,728,000 1,728,000
(National Social Security
Program)
Kartu Indonesia Pintar

5 1 1.33 0 0 1,200,000 1,200,000
(Indonesia Smart Cards)
6 No Assistance 33 44.00 6 60 - -
Grand Total 75 100.00 10 100 15,141,222 71,578,000

53. Of the 68 PAPs surveyed, some PAPs have some social assistance benefits; while about 44% of PAPs affected
by the wellpads and 60% PAPs affected by road widening have no assistance. According to regulations, the
PAPs who did not get any social assistance programs are categorized as prosperous because their household
income is more than IDR 849,747 (poverty line of The World Bank), thus they do not need any social assistance
programs from the government.
4.5. Housing Condition

54. Based on the 2018 LARAP census, land status is primarily SPPT PBB (Notification of Tax Liability for Land
and Building Tax) for 85% PAPs affected by wellpads and 62% PAPs affected by road widening. However,
SPPT PBB is not proof of tax ownership; it only determines the amount of debt that the subject needs to pay
for the tax object. This can happen because the owner does not return the name of the SPPT PBB after the
transfer of rights occurs or the name of the certificate is returned on land and buildings.
55. The proof of legitimate land and building rights is a freehold title. Only about 10% of landowners have freehold
titles for their land. Table 4-14 presents the status of land in the project area.
Table 4-14. Land Status
PAP
No Status of Land Well pads and main Road
% %
facilities widening
SPPT PBB (Notification of Tax Liability
1 51 85.00 5 62.50
for Land and Building Tax)
2 Freehold Title 5 8.33 2 25.00
3 Right to Use Title 1 1.67 1 12.50
4 Deed of Sale and Purchase / Grant 1 1.67 0 0.00
5 Others 2 3.33 0 0.00
Grand Total 60 100.00 8 100.00
56. The most common type of roof used by PAPs affected by wellpads and/or main facilities for their homes is a
zinc roof, while the most common type of wall is bamboo (46.67%) and cement (23.33%). The most common
type of floor is cement at 68.33%, the rest have no floor/soil (18.33%), wooden (5%), ceramic (5%), and
bamboo (2%).Table 4-15 presents the percentage of house building condition by building materialfrom all
PAPs, both those affected by the wellpads and the road widening.
LARAP
25
Table 4-15House Building Condition
PAP
No Building Material Well pads and main Road
% %
facilities widening
1 Roof
Zinc 60 100 8 100
2 Floor
Cement 41 68.33 7 87.50
No floor / soil 11 18.33 1 12.50
Wooden 3 5.00 0 0.00
Ceramic 3 5.00 0 0.00
Bamboo 2 3.33 0 0.00
3 Wall
Bamboo 28 46.67 3 37.50
Concrete brick 1 1.67 1 12.50
Wooden 5 8.33 1 12.50
Plywood 3 5.00 0 0.00
Wooden Board 7 11.67 0 0.00
Cement 14 23.33 2 25.00
Zinc 2 3.33 1 12.50

TOTAL 60 100 8 100
4.6. Community Perception

57. Attitudes and perceptions are largely determined by knowledge and understanding. In addition, cultural
backgrounds and environmental conditions (both physical environment and social environment) of a
community can also determine the attitude and perception towards a project. The following sub-sections
discuss the dissemination of information and the community’s perception of the project.
4.6.1. Participation in Socialization

58. Based on interviews and census, more than a half of PAPs were not involved in the project socialization (Table
4-16), thus only a small number of PAPs were aware of the land acquisition scheme, i.e. land lease. About
63% of PAPs affected by wellpad development stated that land acquisition information could be found from
the land survey team, neighbours, relatives, Tu’a Golo, and the Village Head. This indicates that a series of
community meetings (socialization) should be taken into account before the commencement of land acquisition
to gain community consent to the land acquisition process and approval of the project.
Table 4-16 PAPs Participation in Project Socialization
PAPs
No Participation Well pads and Road
% %
main facilities widening
1 Presence in the project socialization
Yes 29 48.33 1 12.50
No 31 51.67 7 87.50
LARAP
26
2 How is the land acquisition scheme?
Land lease 13 21.67 4 50
Other 1 1.67 0 0
Don’t have the knowledge 46 76.67 4 50

In addition to socialization, how to find out
3
the land acquisition information?
Through the survey team 22 36.67 4 50.00
Through neighbors 5 8.33 3 37.50
Through relatives 5 8.33 0 0.00
Through Tu’a golo 6 10.00 0 0.00
Through Village Head 1 1.67 0 0.00
No answer 21 35.00 1 12.50
60 100 8 100
4.6.2. Knowledge of the Project

59. Most of the PAPs are already known within the planned Project land acquisition area. However, many still do
not understand the scheme and details of land acquisition that will be carried out; thus, the Project should
provide more detailed information about the land acquisition to the PAPs.
Table 4-17PAPs Knowledge of Planned Project and Land Acquisition Plan
PAP
No Knowledge Yes No
Well pads and Road Well pads and Road
main facilities widening main facilities widening
Know about the planned
1 95.00 62.50 5.00 37.50
Waesano Project
Know about the land

2 86.67 87.50 13.33 12.50
acquisition plan
4.6.3. Concern toward the Project Land Acquisition

60. Of note, about 63.33% of PAPs affected by wellpadshave concerns about the land acquisition plan. Many
concerns (26.47%) are regarding clarity around the land acquisition mechanism, as most PAPs were not
involved in previous project socialization. Other concerns are about determining the selling / lease price
(2.94%), some worry about the project impacts to their livelihoods (10.29%), there are concerns about whether
the project will reduce their income, concerns with the project affecting ancestral history, and concerns about
the project not being implemented. Meanwhile for PAPs who are affected by road widening, half of them have
concerns about land acquisition plan. Many concerns (33.33%) are related to selling/ lease price of affected
land.
61. The Project should conduct further community meetings and socialization in order to ensure that all
stakeholders are given sufficient opportunity to voice their opinions and concerns as well as to garner a
resolution on their concerns. These opinions and concerns have been addressed in the LARAP document,
including on the worriness of the projet impacts, mechanism of land compensation and lease, impacts to
ancestralhistory and others.
LARAP
27
Table 4-18 PAPs Concerns toward the Land Acquisition Plan
PAP
No Concern Well pads and main
Road widening
facilities
1 Are there concerns?
Yes 63.33 50.00
No 36.67 50.00
2 What are the concerns?
Clarity of the land acquisition mechanism 26.47 11.11

Do not have other land for farming 5.88 0.00
Related to selling / lease price 2.94 33.33
Worry on the project impacts 10.29 0.00
Reduced income 5.88 0.00
Project affecting ancestral history 1.47 0.00
If the project will not be implemented 1.47 0.00
Others 7.35 11.11
No concern 38.24 44.44
Total 100 100

4.6.4. Willingness for Land Acquisition

62. Almost all PAPs are willing to be involved in the land acquisition process and want to attend the negotiation
process with the LAT. Table 4-19 shows the willingness of PAPs to adhere to the land acquisition process.
Table 4-19. PAPs Willingness for Land Acquisition
PAP
No PAPs Willingness Well pads and main
Road widening
facilities
PAPs willingness for the land to be used
1
for the Project
Yes 91.67 87.50
No 6.67 12.50
Abstain 1.67 0
Not answer 0.00 0
2 Willing to attend negotiations
Yes 100 87.50
No 0 12.50
63. In summary, the following concerns toward the Project resettlement plan may increase the community
sensitivity to potential disputes with the Project:
 Although about 87% have received some information regarding the Project land acquisition plan,
approximately 56% of the censuses affected people stated that they haven not been fully socialized with
regards to the detailed of the plan, and 74% are not yet aware of the land acquisition scheme;
LARAP
28
 62% have some concerns with regards to the land acquisition process – among the most prominent
concern was related to clarity of the land acquisition mechanism;
 Over 50% of the surveyed affected people are not aware of where to file a complaint or share their
concerns. Those who have raised concerns have filed complaints with the village government; and
 Among those who have limited/ no knowledge on the Project land acquisition plan, are those who will be
affected by the road widening plan. Socialization with the directly affected people had not yet been
conducted at the time this LARAP study was conducted.
64. However, of note, majority of the censuses PAPs (i.e. about 92%) have stated their willingness to comply with
land acquisition.
4.6.5. Knowledge of the Project Grievance Process

65. No PAPs who are affected by road widening have knowledge of the grievance mechanism. Most of the PAPs
affected by wellpad construction also do not have knowledge of the grievance mechanism, and most of them
do not know how to file a complaint to the Project (78.33%). Some of them stated that they will go to the
government if they have a complaint, and a few of them will see the Tu’a Golo, the Project Team, or other local
community figures (i.e. youth leader) if they have any complaints. This indicates that the Project still needs
socialization on the project grievance mechanism process to the PAPs.
Table 4-20. Knowledge of Project Grievance Mechanism
PAP
No Grievance Mechanism Well pads and main Road
facilities widening
1 Have Knowledge about Grievance Mechanism
Yes 21.67 0
No 78.33 100
2 Where to file a complaint
Government 13.33 0
Tu’a Golo 3.33 0

Community figure (i.e. youth leader) 1.67 0
Project Team 1.67 0
Written agreement at the project location 1.67 0
No answer 78.33 0
LARAP
29
5. Legal Analysis
5.1. Indonesia Law and Regulations
66. Geothermal exploration is important for energy infrastructure development, and under the national system it is
categorized as a public interest development. Land acquisition for development of public interest in Indonesia
is regulated under a number of laws and regulations.
67. The following are applicable for the Project.
5.1.1. Land Acquisition

68. Law Number 5 of 1960 is a basic Agrarian Law in Indonesia can be referred for land lease and rentals. The
land lease agreements must comply with the standard legal drafting according to the terms and conditions
which each party has agreed upon.
69. Law number 2 of 2012 on Land Acquisition for Development in the Public Interest (Land Acquisition Law) for
acquiring land for public use activities, with the implementing regulations, including(a) Presidential
Regulationnumber 71 of 2012, which has been amended by Presidential Regulation number 40 of 2014,
Presidential Regulation number 99 of 2014, Presidential Regulation number 30 of 2015 and the most updated
one, Presidential Regulation number 148 of 2015; and (b) Head of Land AgencyRegulation 5 of 2012 and its
amendment number 6 of 2015.
70. The Law 2 of 2012 Article 10 (e) clearly states that geothermal energy infrastructure is included as activities
for public interest. Meanwhile the Article 7 (2) states: “Where Acquisition of Land is made for geothermal
energy infrastructure, the acquisitionshallbeperformedwithreferenceto the Strategic Plan and the Working Plan
of the Agencies needing land as intended by section (1) point (c) – the Strategic Plan and point (d) – the
Working Plan of each agency needing land.
The Presidential Regulation number 71 of 2012 has been amended few times. The key changes are:
 Presidential Regulation number 40 of 2014 (...Land acquisition up to 5 hectares can be directly conducted
by the agency needing land with holders of land right through a business transaction or other way agreed
by both parties...), changed the threshold of small-scale land acquisition from 1 to 5 hectares, the small-
scale land acquisition can be done directly by the institution requiring land through normal land purchase,
land exchange or other scheme agreed by both parties (article 121);
 Presidential Regulation number 99 of 2014 (...Head of Land Acquisition Implementation issues

compensation value resulted from appraiser or public appraiser);
 Presidential Regulation number 30 of 2015 (...Finance for land acquisition can be sourced from a business
entity as Agency acquiring the land has been given the right to act on behalf of the state, ministerial, non-
ministerial government agency, or provincial or district government), it allows private company assigned
by the government to develop public infrastructures to use the Law; and
 Presidential Regulation number 148 of 2015 includes revisions of the process for handling objections and
few additional clauses on the requirement for land acquisition for public interest up to 5 ha, as follow:
- Land acquisition for public interest development purpose up to 5 hectares has to be suitable with the
regional spatial planning (RTRW);
- The process does not require location determination letter; and
- The agency that requires land must use a public land appraiser for land valuation appraisal.
- Land acquisition for public interest with size not less than 5 hectares can be implemented directly by
the agency requiring land with the land rights holders, by way of sale or exchange or other means
agreed upon by both parties.
LARAP
30
71. Government Mechanism for Objections to Land Acquisition and Project Development.
As in accordance to the Presidential Regulation 71/2012 (and minor amendment in the Presidential Regulation
148/2015, objections from the public and PAPs against land acquisition for public interest will be channelled
through a formal mechanism. Objections can be proposed in different stages of the government land
acquisition process. Summary of the process is presented as follow (these can be exempted for land
acquisition of public interest requires land up to 5 ha):
 During the public consultation, if any objections raised of the proposed location for project development,
public consultation should be redone, at the latest 30 working days since the minutes of consultation meeting
has been signed. Should objections be still raised after the second round of public consultation, the Project
proponent could then propose objections to the local administrative leader (i.e. Nusa Tenggara Timur
Province).
 Grievance will be assessed by an Appraisal Team (who will be formed by the Governor) to undertake further
assessment on the objections, record the objections, conduct clarification meeting with objected party, and
propose recommendation to receive or reject the grievances. Should it confirm that objection is received;
the Governor has no later than 3 working days to resolve the issue. Depend on the Governor decision, the
Project might be asked to relocate the planned development to other area, or to decide the Location Permit
latest 7 working days from the decision making/ agreement with the objected party.
 Post disclosure of the land appraisal result, should any objection on the inventory and identification of
affected land and assets, community can file for an objection within 14 working days since the
announcement of the result. The land acquisition team would then undertake verification and revision of the
land inventory and inform the verification result, at the latest 14 working days since the received on the
grievance.
 Objection of compensation, if no agreement is reached on the form and/or amount of compensation, the
PAPs can file a complaint with the Province National Administrative Court no later than 14 working days
after the appraisal; the court will decide the form and/or the amount of compensation within a period of
30 working days after the submission of objections. If the complainants object to the decision of the Court,
he/ she may then appeal to the Supreme Court within a period of 14 working days after the decision of the
District Court is issued. The Supreme Court will issue a decision within 30 working days after the appeal is
received. The court decision will be the basis of payment of compensation to the complainants.
72. Presidential Regulation No. 62 Year 2018 regarding the management of social impact in the procurement of
land for national development (both national and non-national strategic project) was recently issued. It
regulates the provision of compensation in the form of money or relocation to non-titled land users. This
regulation requires that compensation should consider the cost of mobilization, cost for moving, house rent
during the transition period, and loss of income. It also requires the proponentto produce documents on the
Social Impact Management Plan in the event that affected government land has been physically used/
controlled by the community consecutively for a minimum of 10 years. The Social Impact Management Plan
shall be proposed to the Governor, which subsequently forms an Integrated Team to undertake inventory data,
compensation appraisal, and facilitate the grievance management.
73. The Minister for Agrarian and the Head of the National Land Agency Regulation 3 of 1997 specifies the
implementation procedures for Government Regulation number 24 of 1997 on the Registration of Land. It
specifies all the procedures and requirements for the land registration and acquisition process. The initial
part/step(s) of the process includes scaling and other requirements for maps, plotting coordinate projections;
regulations pertaining to boundary markets; legitimate census procedures; prescriptions for necessary
documentation; official publication of claim and title processes; objection processes; land title verification and
administrative procedures; and the issuance of land certificates.
74. The transfer of land title is also specified in the Degree of the Minister for Agrarian and the Head of the National
Land Agency Number 21 of 1999 regarding procedure for obtaining land by capital investment companies,
which include:
 The agreement for sale and transfer of control over land;
LARAP
31
 Applications for change of land status or right over land;
 Application forms for particular land use permits; and
 The appropriate forms registering transfer of right over land.
75. Ministry of Home Affairs Regulation Number 1 of 2016 regarding Village Asset Management defines different
types of village asset, and mechanism to lease or borrow and use village asset as alternative of its
management. Head of village is appointed as the authorised right holder of village asset, responsible for its
management. The regulation also requires evidence of ownership status of the asset. For leasing the asset,
maximum length of lease period is three (3) years with optional extension. This regulation will be used to lease
some of the potentially affected government land.
76. Referring to the Law 2 of 2012 and its implementing regulations, the valuation of asset loss is to be done by
certified public land appraisal. The valuation will be carried out based on the MAPPI4 Standards as specified
in the MAPPI Guidelines on Land Acquisition Assessment for Development of Land for Public Interest, defined
in the Indonesia Valuation Standards (SPI) 204 (MAPPI, 2018). The Standard follows the same principles as
the Law number 2 of 2012, in which the determination of the compensation amount is based on the “fair
replacement value” which consider the principles of humanity, fairness, usefulness, certainty, transparency,
agreement, participation, welfare, harmony and sustainability. Approach for appraisal will be conducted for
physical and non-physical objects.
5.1.2. Forestry Land Use

77. The Environmental and Forestry Minister (MoEF) Regulation Number P.27/Menlhk/Setjen/Kum.1/7/2018
provides guidance in the borrow use of forestry area and regulates the application of borrow and use permit
of forestry area (IPPKH/Ijin Pinjam Pakai Kawasan Hutan) required for any activities in the forest area.
Geothermal activities in the forest area will need to obtain the permit before the geothermal license is granted.
78. Few key points of the regulation in association with the Project:
a. The main objective of this regulation is to manage the utilization of forest land for other or non-forestry
purposes (Article 2).
b. The IPPKH is only applicable for the utilization of Production Forest and Protected Forest (Article 3 Verse
1). The forest land utilization should not change the main purposes of the forest land (Article 3 Verse 2).
c. The utilization of forest land for other or non-forestry purposes is allowed to address the strategic activity
with the main objective that could not be avoided (Article 4 Verse 1) where geothermal is one of them
(Article 4 Verse 2 Point “d”).
d. MoEFRegulation No. 27 Year 2018 clause 5 (2c) regarding Guideline on Borrow and Use Permit of
Forestry Area, it is stated that Borrow-Use Permit of Forestry Area for Exploration Activity has no
obligation for land compensation nor revegetation and watershed rehabilitation. But related to this
exploration activity, the project has committment to rehabilitate the land as per condition before use for
project or better.
e. Procedures for IPPKH application (Section II):
 Application for geothermal will be processed in ministry office (Article 14 Verse 3);
 Application process as per Article 14 Verse 3 (non-commercial purposes) will be transferred to

Governor if: (1) Site location as applied for permitting is maximum 5 ha – this is case for Wellpad
WS-D with total area is approximately 2.4 ha; (2) Pertambangan rakyat (local people’s mining);
 Application for geothermal will be processed in ministry office when the permitting is applied by the
ministry – Directorate General of EBTKE for Waesano case;
4
Indonesian Society of Appraisers or ISA
LARAP
32
 Application letter for geothermal exploration send to Ministry via drop box officer (Petugas Loket) at
ministry office attached with technical requirements including: (1) Base map scale 1:50,000 in Shape
File using UTM Datum WGS-84; (2) AMDAL or UKL/UPL document; (3) Recommendation letter from
Governor; (4) Environmental Permit; and (5) Commitment Letter (to fulfil all requirements for IPPKH
application process);
 Application letter and its attachments will be reviewed and verified by Director of Forestry Planning
(Direktur Planologi) within 24 working days in maximum;
 Results of review and verification will be submitting the application letter to Dirjen Bina Usaha
Kehutanan (for Production Forest) or Dirjen Pelindungan Hutan dan Konservasi Alam (for Protected
Forest) for his/her review – if the application comply with the requirement (if no the application will
be returned to the applicant);
 Relevant Dirjen will do technical review. The results will be submitted to Secretary General – if the
application comply with the requirement (if no the application will be returned to the applicant);
 Secretary General will do legal aspect review and prepare draft IPPKH including relevant maps prior
to submitting the documents to Minister within 7 working days;
 Minster will issue IPPKH including relevant maps within 3 working days; and
 The designated timeline is not applicable in case of any technical or legal issues need to verification
on site (site visit).
f. The applicant could not do any activity within the proposed forest land before obtaining the IPPKH, except
for site preparation.
5.1.3. Other Related Regulations

79. Severely affected people are identified as early as possible through the social impact assessment of AMDAL
as referred to in the Environmental Law no. 32/2009 on Environmental Protection and Management, which
includes impacts from the Project land acquisition process.
80. Act No 39 Year 1999 concerning Human Rights identifies and protects a range of human rights. The Act
includes specific protection for the rights of the elderly, children, the poor, pregnant women, and people with
disabilities. These groups are considered as vulnerable people. It also recognizes the differences in and
the needs of, adat law communities that have to be observed and protected by the law of society and
Government” as well as the “Cultural identity of adat law communities, including rights to ulayat land that need
protection.” It espouses that the acquisition of ulayat land by government must be done through due process
of law following the free, prior and informed consent of adat communities.
81. Law No. 11/2009 on Social Welfare and its implementing regulation Ministry of Social Welfare Decree
No. 39/2012 on Delivery of Welfare indicates the poor or those in poverty as part of vulnerable group.
82. Law No. 40 Year 2007 Concerning Limited Company Article 74 (1) observed all companies having its business
activities in the field of and/or related to natural resources, shall be obliged to perform its Social and
Environmental Responsibility. Implementing regulation is provided in the Presidential Regulation Number
47 of 2012, which include the following components:
 Social and environmental responsibilities to be implemented based on the company annual work plan;
 Budget allocation will be accounted as the company’s cost, and to be determined in an appropriate
amount;
 Program implementation should be included in the annual company report to shareholders;
 Sanction will apply for negligence of implementation of the responsibility; and
LARAP
33
 Appreciation may be provided by relevant institution for companies manage to implement the
responsibility according to the regulation.
83. President Instruction No. 9/2000 regarding Gender Mainstreaming in the National Development which give
instruction to apply gender mainstreaming in all of development phases, since planning, implementation,
monitoring and evaluation .
84. Ministry of Home Affairs Regulation No 15/2008aboutGuideline in Implementing Gender Mainstreaming. This
regulation issued to give guideline for all government institution in implementing gendermaintreaming.
5.2. World Bank Safeguards Policy on Land Acquisition

85. The World Bank safeguard policies and procedures triggered for the proposed Waesano Project with respect
to land acquisition include OP 4.12 on Involuntary Resettlement. While the land acquisition process will
prioritize and prefers a willing buyer – willing seller basis, there may be some involuntary land purchases for
road alignments, or future restrictions on access to forest resources, in the exploitation phase.
86. The “involuntary resettlement” refers both to physical displacement (relocation or loss of shelter) and economic
displacement (loss of assets or access to assets that leads to loss of income sources or other means of
livelihood) as a result of the project activities. Resettlement is considered involuntary when affected persons
or communities do not have the right to refuse land acquisition or restrictions on land use that result in physical
or economic displacement. This occurs in cases of: (i) lawful expropriation, or temporary or permanent
restrictions on land use, and (ii) negotiated settlements in which the buyer can resort to expropriation or impose
legal restrictions on land use if negotiations with the seller failed.
87. The World Bank's policies on involuntary resettlement are:
 Involuntary resettlement should be avoided where feasible, or minimized, exploring all viable alternative
project designs;
 Where it is not feasible to avoid resettlement, resettlement activities should be designed and executed
as part of a sustainable development program, e.g., providing sufficient resources to enable the persons
displaced by the project to share in project benefits. Persons displaced by the project should be
meaningfully consulted and be given the opportunity to participate in the planning and implementation of
resettlement programs; and
 Displaced persons should receive assistance in their efforts to improve their livelihoods and living
standards, or at least to restore them, in real terms, to pre-displacement levels or to levels prevailing
prior to the project commencement, whichever is higher.
88. The policy aims to avoid involuntary resettlement if possible, as well as the requirements for participation in
resettlement planning, compensation provision that improves, or at least restores, incomes and living
standards if an involuntary resettlement could not be avoided. The Bank's experience with geothermal projects
in Indonesia with regard to involuntary resettlement indicates that land is acquired through commercial
transactions rather than expropriation, and involuntary resettlement does not occur.
89. The eligibility to compensation includes (i) those who have formal legal rights to land (including customary and
traditional right recognized under the laws of the country) (ii) those who do not have formal legal rights to land
at the time the cencus begins but have a claim to such land or assets-provided that such claims are recognized
under the laws of the country or become recognized through a process identified in the resettlement plan, and;
(iii) those who have no recognizable legal right or claim to the land that they are occupying (entitled to
compensation not for the land, but for assets owned on the affected land). Persons who encroach on the area
after cut off date
90. As a condition of appraisal of project involving resettlement, the borrower provides the Bank with the relevant
draft resettlement instrument which conforms to this policy, and makes it available at a places accessible to
displaced person and local NGOs, in a form,manner and language that are understandable to them. Once the
Bank accepts this instrument as providing and adequate basis for project appraisal, the Bank makes it available
to the public through its Info Shop. After the Bank has approved the final resettlement instrument, the Bank
LARAP
34
and the borrower disclose it again in the same manner.
91. The World Bank OP 4.12 does not apply to resettlement resulting from voluntary land transactions (i.e., market
transactions in which the seller is not obliged to sell, and the buyer cannot resort to expropriation or other
compulsory procedures sanctioned by the legal system of the host country if negotiations fail). It also does not
apply to impacts on livelihoods where the project is not changing the land use of the affected groups or
communities.
92. Land acquisition for the Waesano Geothermal Exploration Project’s drilling activities will be conducted through
voluntary land transaction mechanisms of land lease or willing seller-willing buyer5. In cases of any adverse
economic, social, or environmental impacts from the project activities (exploration drilling) other than land
acquisition (e.g., loss of access to assets or resources or restrictions on land use), the Project aims to avoid,
minimize, mitigate or compensate. However, if significant impacts from voluntary land acquisition are occurred,
the project will apply the requirements of the World Bank OP 4.12 on Involuntary Resettlement to avoid, remedy
or mitigate the impacts.
93. Establish a grievance redress mechanism to receive and facilitate resolution of the affected persons’ concerns.
The GRM should be approriate and accessible for PAPs.
94. Prior to implementation of land acquisition and resettlement activities of the Project, the following processes
are required by World Bank OP 4.12 requirements (detailed applicability for the Project is discussed in Section
6):
 Avoid involuntary resettlement and, if unavoidable, minimize its potential impacts;
 Assess the potential economic and social impacts of involuntary land acquisition and resettlement on the
project affected peoples (PAPs) and their livelihoods;
 Identify categories of affected persons and their respective entitlements;
 Set out clear process of consultation with and participation of PAPs in the preparation and planning of
involuntary land acquisition and resettlement, if any, as well as information dissemination to the PAPs;
 Compensate for lost assets at full replacement cost;
 Compensate informal/illegal land users for lost assets and provide assistance in relocating, if needed;
 Compensate and obtain legal access to expropriated land before starting construction;
 Provide information and prepare special assistance programs for vulnerable groups including the
persons without any immovable property; and
 Provide and prepare plans for grievance redress and monitoring.
5.3. World Bank Policy on Gender

 OP 4.20 Gender and Development
The objectives is to assist members countries to reduce povery and enhance economic growth, human well
being, and development effectiveness by adressing the gender disparities and inequalities that are barriers to
development, and by assisting member countries in formulating and implementing their gender development
goals.
 WB Group Gender Strategy (FY 16-23) Gender Equality, Poverty Reduction, and Inclusive Growth
Within this framework, the World Bank Group Gender Strategy focuses on four objectives
a. Improving human endowments (health, education and social protection). Closing that remaining sticky “first
generation” gaps, while starting to tackle emerging issues, is fundamental to poverty reduction and shared
5
This means market transactions in which the seller is not obliged to sell, and the buyer cannot resort to expropriation or other
compulsory procedures if negotiations fail
LARAP
35
prosperity. Fisrt generation issues include further decreasing maternal mortality, improving women’s access
to health services, closing the remaining gender gaps in education, and expanding social safety nets. Among
emerging, or “second generation” issues are ensuring health care for an aging population and for
noncommunicable diseases;improving early childhood development; breaking down gender stereotypes in
teacher training and curriculum development; increasing girls enrolments in science, technology, engineering,
and mathematics (STEM); facilitating school to work transitions; and developing innovations to promote
womens economic empowerment in social safety net intervensions.
b. Removing constrains for more and better jobs.Increasing women participation in the labor force, their income
earning opportunities and their access to productive assets are central to the achievement of the World Bank
Groups goals, yet remain a frontier are. Parthnership with the private sectof are critical to advancing economic
opportunities for women-one such partnership. The strategy will focus on the determinants for women to
access more and better jobs, including developing policy frameworks for care services., reducing deficits in
infratsructure that prevent women’s participation in paid employment, promoting the conditions for women
entrepreneurship and reducing segregation.
c. Removing barriers to women’s ownershio of control over assets. The strategy will focus on key productive
assets such as land (individual ownership and female access to community owned land); housing, and
technology. Access to financial and insurance services are key enablers of asset ownership, and the WB
Group has committed to push Universal Financial Inclusion to help close the persistent gap between man and
women, notably in access to account. Another important prerequisite is access to identification, which still
eludes the role. The WB Group will assist clients in analyzing data on gender gaps in these areas, and using
evidence to infom policy making, improve business practicess, promote universal identification, and prioritize
financial inclusion in ways that close gender gaps.
d. Enhancing women’s voice and agenc and engaging men and boys. The WB Group will promote and enhance
women’s participation and decision making in service delivery and support the reduction of gender based
violence and mitigate its impact in conflict situations. The WB Group will conitune to support the collection of
evidence about legal gender differences building the base for changing adverse masculinity norms and
promoting positive behaviours and the effective representations, participation and decision making of women
in local service delivery governance structures, notably water, energy, school ,health centre management
committees and local development committees.
5.4. SMI GEUDP ESMF on Resettlement Policy

95. SMI has developed a high-level Environmental and Social Management Framework (ESMF) which provide
guidance and principles to avoid, minimize, and mitigate any adverse environmental or social impacts of all of
its geothermal energy upstream development projects, including resettlement process for the Waesano
Geothermal Exploration Project.
96. The ESMF policy framework for resettlement observes the following process as in accordance to the World
Bank OP/BP 4.12 on Involuntary Resettlement, applicable for the Project:
 Preparation and approval of LARAP, which include:
- Provision ofdocumentation regarding land acquisition needs (including the land that will be needed
for the project in the future, where, and what the existing land ownership and land uses);
- Determine cut-off date and eligibility criteria for all affected persons;
- Collection of evidence as proof of eligibility; and

- Development of an entitlement matrix to ensure that compensation will be paid at replacement value
in addition to transitional assistance; that land is replaced with that of equal value and amenities; that
livelihood assets are replaced with those of equal value; and that benefit sharing is assured through
additional support mechanisms where possible.
 Application of negotiated land compensation which includes meaningful consultations, offer of a fair price,
and transparency in negotiation.
97. The activities in the Project need to comply with both Indonesian laws and regulations and the World Bank
policies. Table 5.1 below presents the comparison of key features between the GOI’s Laws and Regulations
pertaining Land Acquisition and Resettlement, and how they are addressed.Specifically, for the Waesano
Geothermal Exploration Project, land acquisition processes will be conducted to comply with Indonesian law
and regulation, as well as the GEUDP ESMF.
LARAP
36
Table 5.1. Gap Analysis
Scope/Topic Bank Policy Government of Indonesia Gaps Identified Addressed in the ESMF
Regulation
OP 4.12 Involuntary Resettlement
Direct Impacts. Covers provision of benefits to Relates to compensation for loss of No gaps identified. Covered by the valuation methods
address direct social and economic land and assets also other losses as specified in the MAPPI Standards
impacts caused by loss of land, that can be accounted caused by
assets and income. taking of land for a project.
Indirect impacts. States that indirect social and Not covered, however indirect Indirect impacts are not covered in It will be covered in the ESIA, ESMP
economic impacts caused by project impact regulated in Ministry of the land acquisition law. and UKL/UPL
should be addressed under OP 4.01 Environment Regulation No. 16 of
2012 on Compilation of
Environmental Document (AMDAL)
Related activities. Covers impacts that result from other Not covered Related activities are not covered. It is addressed in the RPF and will
activities is if they are (i) directly and be considered in the LARAP process
significantly related to the proposed for each subproject.
project; (ii) necessary to achieve its
objectives; and (iii) carried out or
planned to be carried out
contemporaneously with the project
Host Communities. Impacts on host communities need to Not covered since option of Host communities are not This will be addressed in the LARAP
be considered, and host communities resettlement/relocation is not explicitly covered in the GOI for each subproject
need to be consulted. sufficiently elaborated. regulations.
Resettlement as Resettlement activities should be Resettlement (relocation) is an Lack of non-cash support RPF provides options for
Sustainable conceived as sustainable option of compensation but not compensation consistent with
Development development programs, providing sufficiently elaborated; focuses more OP4.12
Program. sufficient resources to enable on cash compensation.
persons displaced to share in project
benefits.
LARAP
37
Regulation
Vulnerable Groups. Pay particular attention to the needs Project Affected People are not No specific separation by The LARAP will include information
of vulnerable groups among those differentiated by vulnerability or vulnerability or by gender. on the vulnerable groups (women,
displaced, especially those below the gender. very poor, disable, etc.), particularly
poverty line, the landless, the elderly, during the census survey.
women and children, Indigenous
Peoples, ethnic minorities, or other
displaced persons who may not be
protected through national land
compensation legislation.
Resettlement Different planning instruments must Land acquisition plan6 based on a Not equivalent with the Requirement to prepare a LARAP
Planning Instruments. be prepared to achieve the objectives feasibility study, the project development plan in LARAP when subprojects involves
of the policy (resettlement plan, suitability7 to the spatial plan involuntary land acquisition and
resettlement policy framework or resettlement
process framework) and must cover
all aspects of the proposed
resettlement.
Eligibility for No For those without formal legal rights Does not cover squatters (unless in Does not cover squatters The RPF specifies that licensed
Formal Legal Rights. to lands or claims to such land that good faith on public land), appraisers compensation criteria
could be recognized under the laws encroachers and renters on private include among others, assistance
of the country, provide resettlement land. and livelihood
assistance in lieu of compensation for  Landless and laborers are not
land to help improve or at least expected to be compensated
restore their livelihoods. Will covers and provided rehabilitation
measured; it is the
squatters and encroachers responsibility of the landowner
to compensate them.
6
Not the same as World Bank LARAP/RP, here is more implementation procedure than development plan.
7
At present the spatial-planning zoning could accommodate the function that proposed by the project. If not the project has to move to other place or revision of zoning should be issued by
the local parliament proposed by the relevant government institution
LARAP
38
Regulation
Eligibility for IPs are covered when screening Indigenous Peoples are covered by Different ways to identify IPPF specifies that if a subproject
Indigenous Peoples. identifies the presence of IPs as per the land acquisition and resettlement Indigenous People. needs to acquire land, RPF applies.
characteristics in OP4.10 policy legislation once they have been
(which does not require any legal legally recognized8
recognition).
Land for Land Preference given to land based No time allocation and detail The compensation does not RPF provides options for
(Resettlement). resettlement strategies for displaced procedures to implement this prioritize land to land mechanism compensation
people whose livelihoods are land resettlement scheme
based.
Benefits Package. Provide technically and economically Mainly cash; in MAPPI guideline No gaps identified RPF provides requirements for
feasible resettlement alternatives and compensation is market price plus compensation options, and licensed
needed assistance, including (a) transaction and other costs, plus appraisers assess physical assets,
prompt compensation at full premium (to cover beyond valuation cost and loss of non-physical assets
replacement cost for loss of assets cost such as emotional lost). and premium
attributable to the project; (b) if there  Real Property (Physical Assets)
is relocation, assistance during  Land
relocation, and residential housing, or  Buildings & Facilities
 Plants
housing sites, or agricultural sites of  Other things related to the
equivalent productive potential, as land required to restore to
required; (c) transitional support and the owner a property of at
development assistance, such as least the same quality as that
land preparation, credit facilities, owned prior to the land
training or job opportunities as acquisition.
 Cost & Loss (Non-Physical
required, in addition to compensation
Losses)
measures; (d) cash compensation for  Transaction costs
8
In BPN and Forestry Regulations IP institution should be recognized by local government, while institutions that in favor of IPs prefer that the recognition comes from independent IPs
Committee.
LARAP
39
Regulation
land when the impact of land  Moving costs

acquisition on livelihoods is minor;  Loss of on-going business
(business interruption)
and (e) provision of civic
 Other losses of special
infrastructure and community nature, subjective and
services as required. difficult to calculate
 Premium
Full Replacement Requirement for compensation for “Fair and reasonable”, based on No gaps identified Criteria used by licensed appraisers
Cost. land and asset to be at full value assessment made by the as specified in the RPF included
replacement cost licensed appraisers. compensation for physical, non-
physical and premium.
Livelihood The resettlement plan or resettlement Once fair compensation given Impact mitigation not elaborated. RPF included resettlement
Restoration. policy framework also include further consideration and impact assistance and livelihood
measures to ensure that displaced mitigation are not elaborated.
persons are:
(i) Offered support after
displacement, for a transition period,
based on a reasonable estimate of
the time likely to be needed to restore
their livelihood and standards of living
such support could take the form of
short-term jobs, subsistence support,
salary maintenance or similar
arrangements; and
(ii) Provided with development
assistance in addition to
compensation measures described in
paragraph 6 (a) (iii), such as land
LARAP
40
Regulation
preparation, credit facilities, training,

or job opportunities.
Indigenous Peoples. Land of indigenous people is Land of indigenous people is treated WB policy requires specific RPF applies of a subproject involve
addressed in both OP 4.12 and OP in the same way as other, if land engagement and broad land acquisition and/or resettlement,
4.10. If land of IPs is to be taken, rights are recognized by relevant community support by Indigenous regardless of who own the land.
requires broad community support local government Peoples. Consultation as specified in the RPF
and free, prior and informed and LARAP should be consistent
consultation. with the IPPF (free, prior and
informed consultation, broad
community support), specifically
tailored to the local context and the
characteristics of the affected
persons.9
Resettlement Cost. The full costs of resettlement Budget plan is part of land Budget plan does not prioritize RPF and LARAP require that costs
activities necessary to achieve the acquisition plan but tend not resettlement cost. for land acquisition and resettlement
objectives of the project are included considering the resettlement cost. is budgeted
in the total costs of the project. [20]
Consultation and Displaced persons should be Consultation to the Project Affected Consultationis limited and RPF and LARAP require
Complaint Procedure. meaningfully consulted and should People needed to get permit for the grievance redress mechanism is consultation and implementation of
have opportunities to participate in proposed location of the project. limited to the court system. GRM.
planning and implementing There is no prior consultation before
resettlement programs (2.b) negotiation on option of
Grievance mechanism should take compensation. The grievance
into account availability of judicial redress mechanism is clearly
recourses and community and described and within the court it will
traditional dispute settlement follows the court procedure.
mechanism (17) Understanding the limitation and
9Refer to the definition of Indigenous Peoples, the legal framework and to the consultation methods, in the IPPF, Section 7.
LARAP
41
Regulation
over burden of the court system, the

effectiveness of the implementation
still in question
Monitoring of Requirement to carry out adequate Monitoring and evaluation covers the No mechanism for enforcing LARAP specify the requirement of
outcomes. monitoring and evaluation of all occupation, ownership, utilization corrective measures. monitoring of land acquisition and
activities set out in the resettlement and benefit of the result of land resettlement activities. Overall, the
plan acquisition without clear on when, project is required to monitor and
Assess whether the objectives of the how and what correction measure report the preparation and
resettlement instrument have been could be enforced. implementation of LARAP (and
achieved, upon completion of the EMPs and IPPs as well)
project, taking account of the
baseline conditions and the results of
resettlement monitoring
LARAP
42
6. Project Entitlement, Assistance and
Beneficial Measures
6.1. General Approach
98. Land acquisition process for development of public interest is based upon Law Number 2/2012 and it’s
implementing regulations (see Section 5.1.1) and WB Policy on Involuntary Resettlement which have been
adopted in the Resettlement Policy Framework (RPF) of the ESMF GEUDP.The RPF will be used as guidance
for planning and implementation of land acquisition. Implementation of land acquisition will follow the
stages/steps in GoI regulations, but still adhere to the principles of the WB policy.
99. For land acquisition of land above 5 ha, planning stage will be followed by three stages, to be conducted by
the Government agency that needs the land (Ministry of Energy and Mineral Resource / MEMR), i.e. the
Preparation Stage, Implementing Stage and Submission stage. Preparation stage will be initiated once the
Land Acquisition Plan document (prepared in the planning stage) is handed over and approved by the
Governor. However, since the Project will only acquire less than 5 ha land area for each of the road widening
locations, while land for well pads and main facilities will not be purchased, referring to the Presidential
Regulation number 148 of 2015, the process can be directly conducted with holders of land right through a
business transaction or other way agreed by both parties.
100. The following key points are observed in the GEUDP ESMF to be implemented in undertaking voluntary
negotiation:
 Negotiations as to which site is selected based on land-owners’ willingness to sell or lease land;
 Negotiations process will apply the following principles:
- Meaningful consultations with PAP, including those without legal title to land (i.e. those will be affected
by road widening);
- Offer of fair price for land and other assets at replacement cost, as per result of land appraisal to be
conducted by the public land appraisal; and
- Transparency in negotiation with Project Affected People to reduce risks of asymmetry of information
and bargaining power of the parties. An independent external party will be engaged to document and
validate the negotiation and settlement process. Verification (for example, notarized or witnessed
statements) of the voluntary nature of land donations must be obtained from each person selling or
leasing land.
101. Consultation with the entitled parties will be conducted by providing clear, factual and accurate information in
a transparent manner on an on-going basis with no coercion. Providing opportunities for entitled parties to
raise issues, make suggestions and voice their concerns and expectations with regard to the Project.
6.2. Land Acquisition and Resettlement Schemes

102. The Project will procure the proposed land areas for: (a) well pads and main facilities; and (b) road widening,
in different scheme. Well pads area will only be used temporarily during exploration of the Project, while road
widening will be permanent.
103. The following sections discuss the planned schemes for acquiring the land for the Project exploration stage.
For all these schemes, the Project will apply voluntarily negotiations, as in accordance with the GEUDP ESMF.
104. Descriptions of these potential schemes are provided in the following Section 6.2.1 – 6.2.3, while for the next
Project exploitation phase, a separate LARAP will be prepared for the required land, subject to completion of
exploration phase of the Project.
105. Of note, a land acquisition implementation report will be developed at the end of the whole land acquisition
LARAP
43
process to be submitted to the Ministry of Finance and World Bank.
6.2.1. Resettlement of Individually-Owned Land and Assets

106. At the current phase of exploration, the Project will use a land lease to acquire most of the proposed land
required for development of well pads and main supporting facilities (e.g. water treatment, drilling camp).
The agreement will adhere to the local customs for leasing land and based on voluntary negotiations with the
affected people.
107. The Land Lease Agreement must also comply with the terms and conditions that each party has agreed on
and have it in writing; this shall also be acknowledged by the customary leaders. Land lease scheme can refer
to the Basic Agrarian Law Number 5 of 1960, Government Regulation Number 40 of 1996 on Land Use Rights,
and Law Number 2 of 2012 regarding Land Acquisition for Development in the Public Interest. Mainly will
involve the following steps:
 Socialization of the land acquisition plan and proposed scheme to all affected people;
 Preparation of map for each land parcel and confirming boundary with the adjacent land owners;
 Independent appraisal of compensation value refers to SPI 204 for the affected asset, including plants
and structures on land;
 Verification of PAPs data gathered during the current LARAP census and confirm the level of losses for
each PAP, including those that could not be met during the current survey;
 Disclosure of the result of land appraisal and inventory, as well as verification report of PAPs data in the
Village Board;
 Negotiation to get agreement on the amount of land leasing cost and compensation of affected land and
plant;
 Preparation of land lease agreement and documentation for compensation, and verification of legal status
of land to ensure the land not subject to any other claims; and
 Compensation payment and documentation of leasing agreement.
108. Although the Project will only temporary use the proposed land area, and therefore land lease scheme is
preferred, however as part of mitigation measures to manage the potential temporary livelihood loss from the
affected agricultural land, as has been included in the ESIA and also identified in the current LARAP study,
compensation for plants on the land is required. This is aligned with the GEUDP ESMF which observes
adequate compensation of loss of income sources and livelihoods from the Project land acquisition and
resettlement process.
109. Steps for compensation for plants on the affected land will refer to the Law number 2 of 2012 on Land
Acquisition for Development in the Public Interest (Land Acquisition Law) for acquiring land for public use
activities, and its implementing regulations (see Section 5.1) which observed that the appraisal of plants to be
conducted by a public appraisal.
6.2.2. Land Acquisition of Access Road Widening Area

110. Access road use to the perect area are district road along approxmately 23 km, wih the 10 m of existing ROW.. Of note,
SMI has obtained a confirmation letter from District LG about the ROW was 10m wide and their support to the
land acquisition process, dated June 2018.
111. Along those 23 km, of access road, road widening is needed at 23 spots for material and equipment
mobilization.. SMI will give compensation to the land owners for affected land and other assets at replacement
cost, while land owners will release the land to the local government. .
LARAP
44
6.2.3. Non-Individually Owned Asset
112. For the forestry land, mechanism to procure forestry land will refer to the Environmental and Forestry Minister
Regulation Number P.27/Menlhk/Setjen/Kum.1/7/2018 (see Section 5.1.2).
113. In summary, the following steps will be undertaken for the application of IPPKH:
 Submission of permit application to Minister of Environmental and Forestry;
 Evaluation of administrative and technical requirements by the General Director of Forest Planning;
 Coordination with the General Director of Forest Protection and Natural Conservation for application of
permit on Protected Forest area;
 Issuance of permit recommendation, with the permit location map;
 Assessment by the General Secretary and submission of a concept document of the IPPKH permitting
approval, with the permit location map, to the Minister; and
 Issuance of the IPPKH.
114. For village government assets (including land), the transfer process of land assets belonging to the village
(government assets) will follow the procedure set up in the Minsitry of Home Affairs Regulation No. 1/2016,
which states thatto release the assets have to get approval from the governor. To obtain the approval of the
governor, the village head must file a letter to the bupati (head of district) who will then forward it to the
governor. Leasing procedure also regulated in that regulation. Village land can be leased fora period of three
(3) years, with optional extension. Lease agreement should include (i) Clarity of leased objects (type, large
area or unit number and period of lease); (ii). Responsibility over operational and maintenance cost trhoughout
the lease period, (iii). Right and responsibility of each party, and (iv) Force majeure conditions.
115. Meanwhilefor the affected communal land in Dusun Nunang, the Project will initially undertake consultation to
get agreement of compensation form or leasing cost that will be conducted with all community members and
customary leader witnessed by village government and/or district official. Ceremonial rites of land transfer will
be conducted as per requested.
6.3. Eligibility, Cut-off Date, and Entitlement of Compensation

116. The PAPs eligible for compensation consisted of the following types:
 Persons with formal legal rights to the loss land in its entirety or in part;
 Persons who loss the land they occupy in its entirety or in part who have no formal ownership rights to
such land, but who have claims to such lands that are recognized or recognizable under national laws
e.g. through tax payment;
 Persons cultivated the lands of over 10 years and planted the loss land; however, do not have claims to
the land; and
 Institutions have rights over the loss land under Indonesia Law.
117. The cut-off-date of eligibility refers to date when cadastral measurement is completed, which was .31 August
2018. The date has been disseminated to PAPs and that all PAPs have been aware of it. The cut-off date sets
the time limits to determine eligibility of persons living and/or with assets or interests inside the project areas.
Should they be adversely affected, they will be entitled to compensation for their affected assets, including
rehabilitation measures, as needed, sufficient to assist them to improve or at least maintain their pre-project
living standards, income-earning capacity and production levels. After the cut-off date, those who encroach
into the project areawill not be entitled to compensation or any other assistance.
118. Essentially, adherence to World Bank Safeguard policy and GEUDP ESMF require the inclusion of more
informal owners in the corridor in some form of compensation or resettlement plan. It requires that the project
can clearly demonstrate that the lifestyles and livelihoods of all affected parties are maintained or enhanced.
LARAP
45
Adoption of the World Bank and GEUDP ESMF process are expected to reduce or mitigate the social impacts
of the project and are likely to derive tangible longer-term benefits in community acceptance of the project.
119. Entitlements matrix10 (Table 6-1) has been prepared to define the Project strategy to ensure adequate
compensation for all affected people. This Entitlements Matrix is developed based on the types of loss that a
PAP may suffer from, the criteria for eligibility (who will be entitled to value compensation, rehabilitation, and
resettlement support), and a range of entitlements (forms of compensation for each different impact which are
not always financial). In principle, the compensation value will be assessed by an independent and certified
public appraisal referring to the SPI 204, as well as additional consideration of entitlement based upon
international standards as defined by the World Bank Safeguard and GEUDP ESMF on Resettlement.
Table 6-1Entitlement for the Project PAPs
No Type of Losses Entitled Person Project entitlement Implementation Issues

A. Land Loss
1 Permanent Person / group  Compensation at replacement  Valuation of replacement cost
agricultural land with legal cost as per valuation of will be conducted by
loss (for access title/registration of independent appraisal result; independent public appraisal
 Certification of the remaining
road ) land ownership
land will not use for road  Negotiation for leasing cost will
improvement. be conducted in transparent
manner with no coercion.
Village  Transfer of village land  Valuation of replacement

government land mechanism referring to cost will be conducted by
Ministry of Home Affairs independent public
Regulation No. 1 Year 2016 appraisal;
Sharecroppers  Annual crops: cash  Valuation of affected plant

compensation will be paid and secondary structure will
based on prevailing market be conducted by
rates; independent appraisal;
 Perennial crops:
 Advance notice to harvest
compensation at replacement
tree /crops products.
cost taking into account their
productivity and age;
 Timbers/trees: compensation
at current market rate based
on age, type of trees and
diameter of trunk at breast
height;
 Secondary structure will be
compensated at replacement
cost
2 Temporary land Person / group  Leasing land compensation  Valuation of leasing cost will
losses (for well with legal for 5 to 7 years; be conducted by
pads and project title/registration of independent public
 Certification of all land areas
facilities) land ownership appraisal;
affected by the Project
facilities (including the well  Negotiation for leasing cost
pads, its main and supporting will be conducted in
facilities); transparent manner with no
coercion.
 Land will be restored to pre-
Project condition or even
better.
10
This entitlements matrix is based on the current understanding of the project, it will be updated with more specific information
as more research is undertaken on the specific land affected by the project, and the parties affected by its change of use.
LARAP
46
Village  Leasing mechanism refer to  Valuation of leasing cost will
government land referring to Ministry of Home be conducted by
Affairs Regulation No. 1 Year independent public
2016 appraisal;
Sharecroppers  Annual crops: cash

compensation will be paid
based on prevailing market
rates;
 Perennial crops:
compensation at replacement
cost taking into account their
productivity and age;
height
3 Loss of communal Member of Cash compensation at  For communal land,
land communal replacement cost or other types all consultation to get agreement
owners of communal land as per of compensation or leasing
provisions compensation for loss cost will be conducted with all
of land above and ceremonial rites community member and
customary leader witnessed by
of land transfer;
Village Government and/or
Sub District Official.
 Observe ceremonial rites prior
to construction if upheld by
customary communities.
4 Plant or trees  Annual crops: cash  Valuation of affected plant will

compensation will be paid be conducted by independent
based on prevailing market appraisal;
rates;
 Advance notice to harvest
 Perennial crops: compensation
tree /crops products
at replacement cost taking into
account their productivity and
age;
height
5 Secondary structure Owner of the Cash compensation for structure Valuation of affected asset will be
assets with at replacement value based on conducted by independent
registration or who market price free
appraisal.
is identified in ofdepreciation/transaction costs
and salvaged materials .
census
6 Community Owner of public or  Reconstruction of lost
structures or public community structure in consultation with
Infrastructure losses infrastructure community. They will be fully
(such as: replaced or rehabilitated so as
PAMSIMAS water to satisfy their pre-project
treatment) functions taking intoaccount
any recognised new needs
LARAP
47
that could increase use or
service levels
8 Loss of resource Vulnerable and  Certification of all land areas
bases severely PAPs that affected/leased by the
Project facilities (including the
well pads,its main and
supporting facilities), and the
remaining land;
 For the land affected by road
widening, certification for the
remaining land;
 Provision and prioritize of
employment opportunities for
the affected people or its
household members in project-
related job opportunities (list of
PAPs will be informed to
contractor); and/or
 Participate in community
development program (for
vulnerable and severelly PAPs
of project area) which are
already initiated as part of the
PT. SMI’s CSR/CDP program
Source: PT SMI (Persero), December2018
LARAP
48
7. Valuation of Assets and Calculation of
Compensation for Losses
7.1. Valuation of Assets
120. Valuation of asset will be based on replacement cost principles as regulated in the OP 4.12 and adopted in the
ESMF GEUDP. To ensure compensation fulfill that principles, the valuation / appraisal of affected land and
other assets will be conducted by accredited independent evaluators following standards established by the
Indonesian Association of Professional Evaluators (Masyarakat Profesi Penilai Indonesia, MAPPI)11.
121. The basis of assessment are: (i) Fair Replacement Value - This value can be understood as a value based on
the interests of the owner (the value to the owner)12; (ii) market value equivalence13; (iii) non-physical losses
caused by the compulsory right relinquishment of property owner14; (iv) property ownership is not limited to
ownership rights, but can be interpreted as control, management and use of property in accordance with
applicable laws and regulations or according to the agreed scope of assignment; (v) valuation date is the
announcement date, and the date of site determination for development for public interest in accordance with
the applicable legislations; (vi) value adding should be calculated based on the risks incurred from owner’s
potential losses. The adequate replacement value must be higher than Property Market Value or at least equal
to the compensation transaction value of similar property (if the comparator is similar property from a
compensation transaction).
122. Compensation assessment in this standard includes but not limited to: i) the construction of resettlement; ii)
education and motivation programs; iii) provision of working facilities; and iv) business facilities compensation.
Assessment approach is specified in the detailed SPI 204(Table 7.1).
Table 7.1Replacement Cost Assessment Using Indonesia’s Valuation Approaches

Valuation object Calculation basis Approach Remark
Physical: Land or land & Market and Non-Market Market &
structures Income
Structure &/or New replacement cost Cost In principle, valuation standard set
Complementary Facility with adjustments by Independent appraisers’
association does not apply
depreciation for physical condition
of the affected building.
Crops Markets & reasonable Income With the Discounted Cash Flow
cultivation calculation method for one cycle
norms
Market For non-commercial plant, using
references from relevant agencies.
Cost Immature crops

Non-Physical: Adequate Market and non-market Income Based on applicable laws and
replacement of the loss on regulations
right relinquishment from Cost Losses due to termination or
landowners who will be closure of business premises.
given a premium
11
See Indonesia Valuation Standards (SPI) 204, Land Acquisition Assessment for Development of Land for the Public Interest,
Code of Ethics Indonesia Appraisers and Indonesia Standard, 2018
12
Value to the owner is defined as the economic benefits derived from the possession or ownership of a property.
13
The market value is one of the basis for value determination by taking into account limited or entirely absent data market. This
market value can be compared with the value based on the potential use (without looking at the benefit of land acquisition plan
for the public interest).
14
Non-physical loss is other losses, as referred to in Law No. 2/2012, Article 33 f and its elucidation, applicable or according to
the agreed scope of Tenure.
LARAP
49
Valuation object Calculation basis Approach Remark
Loss of job or loss of Additional compensation e.g.: fish farmers, small restaurant - if
business, including calculated based on: no other provisions, can be
profession shift. - potential income15 considered for an average 3 months
- income for the last for business & 6 months for the
month16 professional shift.
-
Emotional losses e.g.: 5% - 30% from the market value
(solatium) of homes (land & building) as
stipulated in these guidelines with the
agreement of the assignor.
Transaction cost Based on socio-economic Cost  Cost of moving

study conducted by expert  Cost of clearing
consultant or applicable  Tax associated costs
laws & regulations  Cost of Certificate of Land Deed
Official (PPAT)
Waiting period Based on the risk-free rate, Based on applicable laws and
Compensation (interest) or the government bank regulations
deposits interest
Loss of residual land Market Market data

Other physical losses Reparation cost Cost
7.1.1. Compensation for Land Lease

123. Compensation for land lease will be based on voluntary negotiations with the holders of land rights. The
followings will be considered in the determination of the value of land lease:
 Result of public appraisal (Kantor Jasa Penilai Publik or KJPP) on the value of affected land and plants;
 Historical income value generated or potentially generated by the affected land in the future (as identified
from this LARAP study); and
 Market value for land lease in other adjacent area e.g. in other sub-districts in Manggarai Barat (land lease
is uncommon scheme for locals therefore no benchmark value at local level was found during the study
period.
7.1.2. Compensation of Non-Individually Owned Asset

124. As discussed in earlier Section 6, for village government asset (including land), lease of asset and transfer of
assets mechanism refering to Ministry Home Affairs Regulation No.1 Year 2016. It should include operational
and maintenance cost of the land.
7.1.3. Entitlement to Vulnerable and Severely PAPs

125. In addition to government requirements, GEUDP ESMFrequires full compensation to be paid at replacement
value. Livelihood assets are to be replaced with those of equal value. Benefit sharing is assured through
additional support mechanisms where possible.
126. The provision of compensation for both government valuation and loss of income sources from the affected
assets for each affected people category, as specified in an entitlements matrix (see Section 6.4) that includes
the range of measures for compensation that includes cash or in kind compensation, income rehabilitation
assistance, income substitution/business restoration. The type of compensation depends upon the affected
peoples’ losses, including the type; extent and nature of their losses, and which will suffice to restore their
social and economic base. As per socio-economic baseline of the PAPs and impacts significance identified in
15
For business - net income plus the liabilities of business costs need to be paid for the transfer, such as the cost of
permanent employees
16
For shift in profession
LARAP
50
this LARAP report, the following will be provided for the severely and vulnerable PAPs:
 Entitle to participate in the livelihood restoration program as part of PT SMI CDP program
 Priority for a household family member in project-related jobs; and
 Certification of land which will be leased for the well pads and main facilities. This will be included as part
of lease agreement, to be provided at the end of lease term.
127. Gender Strategy . Based on the section under WB Gender Policy, the following specific actions seek to
address gender issues as well as for other vulnerable sectors in the Project:
 Women, the elderly, and disabled will be invited to/represented in consultations LARAP implementation;
 In conducting the Detailed Measurement Survey and consultations on resettlement activities, both women
and men will participate in the discussions – to include the elderly and disabled (maybe by representation);
 Both husband and wife will be invited to be present to receive the compensation and other allowances
due to the household for affected assets.
 Women will be given equal chance in getting hired for unskilled works and receive equal remuneration for
the same work by the men.
 Women, the elderly, and disabled will be prioritized in Livelihood Restoration Program to be provided
during LARAP implementation specifically as vulnerable/ severely AH heads.
 Disaggregated monitoring indicators by sex, ethnicity, and vulnerable groups will be developed for
monitoring social benefits, economic opportunities, livelihood, and resettlement activities.
7.2. Calculation of Compensation

128. Calculation of land price and other compensation for crops, trees, structure, and other affected assets shall be
provided based on the land census through the independent and certified public appraisal office (KJPP).
The estimated budget is presented in Section 11.1.
LARAP
51
8. Consultation, Participation and Information
Disclosure
129. With regard to WB’s disclosure policy, it is a requirement that key information on LARAP will be
disclosed.Consultations and discussions will be continued with the affected people, SMI, Land Acquisition
Committee and other stakeholders to inform various stakeholders about the land acquisition preparation and
implementation toidentify concerns and to seek feedback from the affected people and concerned groups.
Methods to be used during the consultations will include: public meetings, individual interviews, group
interviews, and field level observations. All minutes of meetings, photos, attendance sheets will be prepared
and recorded.
8.1. Consultation Prior to Preparation of LARAP Document

130. A Stakeholder Engagement Plan (SEP) has been developed specifically for the Waesano Geothermal
Exploration Project consisting of stakeholder engagement programs and a proposed grievance mechanism
(see Final SEP Report, June 2018). The SEP has included a stakeholder analysis and proposed planning for
on-going stakeholder engagement; which will be a supporting activity in line with the implementation of
environmental and social management plan (ESMP), UKL-UPL monitoring, as well as continued engagement
during the land acquisition process. The SEP will be function as a living document which will need to be revised
along with the Project development or changes. Moreover, the implementation of SEP will require a
coordinated program for community engagement. It has included record of consultation associated with the
Project plan for land acquisition.
131. Detailed descriptions of engagement and consultation undertaken for the Project prior to the recent study for
this LARAP and key issues identified associated with land acquisition issues have been reported in the Final
ESIA and SEP Report (June 2018) and Preliminary LARAP (March 2018). With respect to historical land
acquisition activities, the following stakeholder engagement has occurred:
Table 8.1. Consultation Prior to Preparation of LARAP Document
Approach and
Time and Location Stakeholders Issue Raised
Methodology
March 2017 at Head of Village,  Participatory mapping Identification of some sacred area
Waesano Village Community Leader (Tua and potentially cultural heriitage in
Golo), Communities the propose project location
March 2018 Customary head (Tu’a  Key informant interview There were several key issues
(preparation of Golo), Head of Village, raised during these community
 Interview to land
Preliminary LARAP).at Head of Sub-district, and engagement activities, including
owners
Waesano Village and landowners concerns on land acquisition and
Villages affected by expectations for local community
road access widening involvement during the Project
development;
November 2016 Head of Subdistrict, Head  Public Consultation  Expectation for local employment
(during ESIA Study) at of Village, Community and provision of business
Waesano Village Leader (Tua Golo), partnership opportunities to
support project operation e.g. for
Communities food and lodging;
 Expectation for community
May 2018 (finalization Head of Village,  Consultation
development program in the form
of ESIA document) at Community Leader (Tua of socio-economic empowerment
 Walktrough
Waesano Village Golo), Communities for local people and infrastructure
development such as road repairs
to support tourism development in
the village;
LARAP
52
Approach and
Methodology
 Fears of mud flow (as occurred in
the ‘Lapindo case’);
 Concern toward potential impacts
on natural preserve and physical
cultural resources e.g. Sano
Nggoang Lake, spring water, old
historical villages; and
 Worried about the unclear scheme
of land acquisition and
compensation plan.
8.2. Consultation/Socialization during Preparation of LARAP Document

132. To address potential issues associated with the project land acquisition, series ofsocialization regarding land
acquisition process was conducted on 6-7 December 2018 in Waesano Village and sub-district office.
Information delivered during the socialization were about description of project and impact to the community
assets, estimation number of PAPs and their losses, mechanism and scheme of compensation, grievance
redress mechanism dan tentative schedule for land acquisition and project implementation. Unfortunately
socialization on 6December 2018was taken by object community to express their objection, so the material
about land acquisition has not been conveyed properly. Additional consultation was conducted on 19 and 20
December 2018regarding project planning as requested by LG and some community leader. Summary of
the said consultation and socialization are as follow.
Table 8.2. Consultation/Socialization During Preparation of LARAP Document
Approach and
Methodology
August 2018 at Customary head (Tu’a Golo),  Interview of land Get further information about land
Village of Head of Village, Head of Sub- owners ownership status and basic
Waesano, Wae district, and landowners information of land owners and their
Lolos, Golo Mbu perception to the project plan
and Golo
6 December 2018  Owners of land and  Socialization  Object people said their reason of
at WaeSano non-land assets of /consultation objection was because they
project area worries about negative impacts
Village Office meeting
due to exploration activities to
 Manggarai Barat their livelihood and farming
LG (Vice activities. Objection specifically
Bupati,Secretary of raised by some people from
Bupati, Assistant II Nunang sub villagge who live
of the Bupati, Head close to the drilling point.
of Sano Nggoang
Sub District, Head  Further dialog with the Nunang
of Waesano Village villagers who still reject the project
will be conducted by PT SMI.
 Tu’a Golo Manggarai BaratLG will facilitate
(customary leader) the dialog;
and religious leader
The attended
participants were not
only affected land
owners, but also Nunang
Villagers who expressed
their rejection to the
project plan, with some
following reasons:
LARAP
53
Approach and
Methodology
7 December 2018  PAPs who owned  Socialization  Some affected land owners from
at Sano Nggoang land and non land /consultation Nunang and Lempe attended
Sub District Office assets affected by meeting socialization because they want to
exploration area. get more information about land
acquisition;
 Land Acquisition
 PAPs agreed their land use for road
Committee (Vice
improvement; they aware about the
Bupati, Assistant
mechanism of land acquisition,
of Bupati, other
entitlement and tentative scheduled;
related
 Customary leader from Nunang
Institutions, Head
requested PT SMI to conduct
of Subdistrict,
specific consultation invited rejected
Head of Vilages
peoples in order to have further
and Tu’a Golo.
dicussion on the reason of rejection
 PT SMI
and provided clarification regarding
negative impacts geothermal
project.
19 December  Nunangs Sub Village Socialisation/  The agenda initially was
2018 at people who object to Consultation meeting to disseminate information
Sanonggiang project regarding geothermal and benefit,
Subdistrict Office  Land Acquisition Team potential enviromental impact and
from the District mitigation and dialogue with object
 Head of Subdistrict people.Unfortunately no body was
 Head of Community (Tua came, eventough the LAT, Central
Golo) Government and SMI then came to
 Central Government Nunang Sub Village
(National Geological
Agency, MoF, MEMR)
 PT SMI
20 December  Communities surrounding Consultation meeting  Keynote speaker from National
2018 at project area Geological Agency
Sanonggiang  Land Acquisition Team disseminated information
Subdistrict Office from the District regarding geothermal and the
 Head of Subdistrict benefit, potential enviromental
 Head of Community (Tua impact and mitigation.
Golo)  Some participants said that the
 Central Government objection indicated information
(National Geological have not properly understand
Agency, MoF, MEMR) by communitiy.Their missed
PT SMI undertanding become worse
due to distribution of video
about negative impact of
Mataloko geothermal
exploration activities.
 Requested transparancy for all
phases of project activity
process
 Suggest material for
socialization include information
regarding impact of geothermal
to community farm, since
farming is main
communitysource of income
LARAP
54
133. Future and on-going stakeholder engagement and consultations are proposed for each stage of the land
acquisition process.The following approaches will be used throughout the land acquisition process as part of
the project stakeholder engagement program:
 Inform, consult, and involve all PAPs in the decision-making process of the land acquisition and
compensation;
 Collaboration and empowerment/development with the PAPs, vulnerable and significantly affected people
in particular, including consideration of gender strategy to ensure appropriate consultation strategy with
women holders of land rights;
 Consultation with stakeholders involved in the Project land acquisition process and significant
figures/leaders that have a strategic role in the community. Further consultation with each of the
ccustomary leader/family clan as the owners of the proposed land will be conducted to enable the land
release, along with appropriate disclosure and consultation to all affected persons regarding the Project
land acquisition process.
8.3. Disclosure
134. Upon approval of from the World Bank, LARAP document will be generated and produced in a timely manner,
and posted in both World Bank and PT SMI websites, and at any locally accessible place in a form and
language understandable to the affected communities and other stakeholders. The project information will be
made available to affected communities as leaflets or brochure in Bahasa Indonesia.
LARAP
55
9. Organisational Arrangement and
Responsibilities
135. In the general organizational structure of the Project Management Unit (PMU) and Exploration Site Team
(EST), the responsibilities related to the implementation of this LARAP fall under the Social Specialist and
Community Relations (seethe followingFigure 9-1 and Figure 9-2).
136. Main personnel will be responsible or involved in the implementation of land acquisition and resettlement for
the Project as well as of this LARAP:
Table 9-1Roles and Responsibility of the Project Land Acquisition Process
No Unit/ Personnel Key Roles and Responsibility
1 PMU Safeguard  Responsible for the whole land acquisition and resettlement process and ensure full
Team compensation/ replacement value
 Leading engagement and liaison with government team and other related parties
(e.g. the Public Appraisal Office/ KJPP) during the land acquisition and resettlement
process
 Ensure proper GRM in place and accesable by PAPs and communities in project
area
 Conduct internal monitoring of the land acquisition process, including evaluation
toward the livelihood restoration of the Project affected people/ households
2 EST –  In coordination with PMU Safeguard Team support Land Acquisition Team
SiteManager and (established by LG) inthe implementation of land acquisition process, includes
team socialization, negotiation and handling complaints.
3. Land Acquisition  In collaboration of SMI PMU Safeguard Team and the EST (including Site Manager)
Team (Ad Hoc liaisewith the government of Manggarai Barat Regency throughout the whole land
Team consist of acquisition and resettlement process
several institutions
 Socialization of the proposed land acquisition and resettlement scheme as well as
within Manggarai
disclosure/ negotiation of the compensation and payment process.
Barat LG,
established by  During socialization process, explains the process of land acquisition and
Bupati Decree) resettlement, framework to determine the value of the change of profit, the form of
loss and the rights and obligations of the party entitled, also to inventory any
problems or objections and to classify the objection (type and reason for objections,
objections and suggestions of the opposing parties).
 Assist the independent appraisal during inventory and identification of affected land
 Assist in handling any complaints related to project impact and land acquisition
process
LARAP
56
Source: PT SMI (Persero), September 2018
Figure 9-1 Project Management Unit (Jakarta Based)
Source: PT SMI (Persero), September 2018
Figure 9-2Exploration Site Team
LARAP
57
10.Implementation Schedule
137. The schedule for land acquisition is in accordance with the updated schedule of Waesano Exploration Project as shown in the following table.
Table 10-1Land Acquisition Schedule
No Activities Timeframe 2018 2019 2020

Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb March April May June July Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec Jan to
March
1 Preparation of LARAP
a Cadastral Measurement and August to November
Socio Economic Households 2018
Survey
b LARAP finalization August to December
2018, March 2019
c World Bank review and April 2019
approval on LARAP
d LARAP disclosure April 2019
2 LARAP Implementation
a Socialization of detailed land December 2018,
acquisition plan April to May 2019
b Independent appraisal of June 2019
compensation value for all
affected asset, and report
completion
c Measurement of project December 2018 to
boundary by BPN January 2019, and
May 2019
LARAP
58
March
d Disclosure of the result of land June 2019
appraisal and inventory, as well
as verification report of PAPs
data in the Village Board
e Negotiation to get agreement on July tp Aug 2019
the amount of land leasing cost
and compensation of affected
land and plant
g Compensation/Lease
Payment
 Compensation September to
payment October 2019
 Implementation of October 2019 to
Livelihood March 2020
Restoration Program
to 63 vulnerable and
severely PAPs.
LRP will be part of PT
SMI Community
Development
Program, in the form
of improving of fabric
crafts, processing of
honey and cashew
nuts (non timber
forest product ) and
carbonizing of
candlenut waste
 Land certification Dec 2019
LARAP
59
March
h Monitoring
 Internal monitoring On going during
(submission of implementation
quarterly reports)
 External monitoring 6 month after

(if needec) compensation
completed
LARAP
60
11.Cost and Budget
11.1. Compensation Cost
138. The appraisal of land and other affected assets have not been conducted by the time this report is developed.
Therefore, confirmed budget could not be obtained. The following estimation using general market and NJOP
rate is based on information obtained during the development of Preliminary LARAP study (June, 2018).
Information ony from land owners might be bias to be used in estimating actual budget. The estimated budget
here isto be updated once the land appraisal survey by a certified public land appraisal is completed.However,
PT. SMI has allocated the budget for land acquisition implementation using the highest estimation.
139. Summary of budget for compensation of affected asset is provided in the Error! Reference source not f
ound..
11.1.1. Estimated Compensation for Land

140. Based on interviews with stakeholders during the Abbreviated (Preliminary) LARAP study, it was identified that
the range of land price based on NJOP and market price is IDR 10,000 to 15,000 per m2 or IDR 100 million to
150 million per Ha. Differences in land price will depend on the location of land. For this LARAP purposes
estimation unit rate for purchase land will refer to maximum marketrate, while for leasing will refer to Bupati
Manggarai Barat Decree No.16/2015 on the Amount of Rent Use for Land and Building belong to Manggarai
Barat District LG, which stated leasing cost for land was 15% of land purchased per year. Following are
estimation budget for lease and compensate the land for project
 Estimation budget for land leasing for 5 years is = 15%x(170,872.88 m2 x 15,000 x 5 years) =
IDR 1,922,319,900
 Estimation budget for replacement cost of land (for widening road access) is = 6,685.55 x 15,000
= IDR 100,283,250
11.1.2. Estimated Compensation for Affected Secondary Structure

141. A total of 38 m2 of as resting place in the area - made of temporary materials that serve as resting place while
working on the farmowned by 5PAPs will be affected by the project. Estimation unit rate for affected secondary
structure will be base on the valuation by licensed appraisal. For estimation budget in the LARAP was refer to
highest rate of affected secondary structure appraised by licensed appraisal forone of PLN Project in West
Kupang District, i.e IDR 600,000 per m2 or IDR. 600,000 x 38 = IDR22,800,000.
11.1.3. Estimated Compensation for Affected Plants/Trees

142. The following assumptions are used to estimate budget for compensation of affected plants above the land –
it is calculated based on average harvest value of different type of plants, obtained during the household
census:
 Timbers e.g. Mahoni, local wood – approximately IDR 600,000 to 1,000,000;

 Fruit trees e.g. Mango, Avocado, Coconut – range quite broad from 25,000 to 500,000;
 Annual harvested plantation e.g. Coffee, Clove, Candlenut – about IDR 15,000 to 90,000; and
 Crops e.g. paddy chilli, vegetables) – IDR 10,000 to 15,000.
11.1.4. Estimated Compensation for Forestry Land

143. Potentially forestry land affected area for well pad WS-D, disposal area and access road to well pad WS-D will
not be any compensation such as non-tax government payment (PNPB) and compensating land according to
MoEF number P.27/Menlhk/Setjen/Kum.1/7/2018 regarding IPPKH.
LARAP
61
11.1.5. Livelihood Restoration Budget
144. GEUDP ESMFrequires compensation to consider the livelihood restoration of the affected people. Should this
not cover the calculation of the rental or purchase value by the government team, additional measures may
be applied such as through the provision of a livelihood restoration program as part of PT SMI CDP program17.
The implementation of the program can be implemented as aligned with the social and environmental
responsibility program of the Project. This is observed by Indonesia Law 40 or 2007 for all companies having
its business activities in the field of and/or related to natural resources shall be obliged to perform its Social
and Environmental Responsibility.
145. Estimation bugdet for the LRP program refer to PT SMI CDP Program was IDR 1,761,800,000.
11.1.6. Budget for Land Certification

146. Budget for land certification was refer to the Government Regulation No. 128 year 2015 on the Type and Tariff
on Non-Tax Revenue Applicable to the Ministry of Agricultural and Spatial Planning / National Land Agency .
Estimation cost for certification of land per parcel was IDR 750,000
11.2Total Budget for Implementation of LARAP

147. The following cost will be applied for the implementation of land acquisition and resettlement for the whole
Project facilities, with approximate total budget of IDR 10, 615,584,753,-.or USD 758,25618
Table 11-1Total Budget for Implementation of LARAP

Large Area/Unit Budget Estimation
No Activities
(IDR)
1 Compensation
a. Land Leasing 1,922,319,900

b. Replacement cost for land affected by road
100,283,250
access
c.Non-individually owned asset/ land
o Forestry land (IPPKH application
26,315.21 N/A
and approval)
o Village government land 768.97 11,534,550
o Communal Land (lease) 909.76 2,046,960
c. Compensation for Affected Trees 6,155,040,000

o Trees/Timbers 4,499 4,499,000,000
o Fruit Trees 1,334 667,000,000
o Annual harvested plantation 9,658 869,220,000
o Crops 7,988 119,820,000

e. Compensation for affected secondary
22,800,000
structure
17
A community development program called Desa Bakti untuk Negeri II (DBUN II) was developed by PT SMI in order to manage
environmental and social impact due to Waesano geothermal exploration activities. According to assessment conducted by
Yayasan Dian Desa (YDD – and NGO assigned by PT SMI in implementing the program), DBUN II devided to two program,
which are Catagory A which will provided in the form of improvement of education facilities and revitalizing of water supply facilities
which have been started in 2 October 2018.
Catagory B was consist of four component, i,e improving of fabric crafts, processing of honey and cashew nuts (non timber forest
product ) and carbonizing of candlenut waste. Program improving of fabric craft just started in early of October 2018, while other
components will be start next year.
18
exchange rate 1 USD = IDR 14,000
LARAP
62
Large Area/Unit Budget Estimation
No Activities
(IDR)
f. Livelihood Restoration Program 63 vulnerble AHs 1,761,800,000.
e Land certification (for all land areas affected 82 parcel of land
by the Project facilities (including the well
61,500,000
pads,its main and supporting facilities, and
access road widening)*
Sub-Total Compensation 9,311,916,450
2 Operational Cost (4% x total compensation) 372,476,658
Overal Total 9,684,393,108
Contingensies (10 of total compensation) 931,191, 645
TOTAL Budget 10,615,584,753
LARAP
63
12.Grievance Redress Mechanism
148. Management of grievances has been proposed in the SEP (see Final SEP Report, June 2018); it has an
important role in managing social issues and risks. The grievance redress mechanism (GRM) is a way for the
community to be able to provide hopes/goals, feedback or submit a grievance related to all project activities,
both orally and in writing, in order to garner support for the implementation of project activities, including land
acquisition activities. Generally, the Project grievance mechanism will be in line with GEUDP ESMF, which
states that "the grievance mechanism establishes a procedure to receive and facilitate resolution of Affected
Communities' concerns and grievances about the client's environmental and social performance".
149. Specifically, for land acquisition matters, the Project will adopt the government process for handling objections
(see Section 5), along with the general grievance mechanism for all Project activities. The following principles
will be applied in the implementation of the Project GRM:
 No cost shall be borne to the APs in relation with the grievance redress mechanism;
 GRM will be disclosed in accessible location e.g. head of village office or church; and
 Community leaders (e.g. Head of village, Tu’a Golo, and Head of Sub-district will be consulted (e.g.
through workshop or group discussion) to better understand the Project GRM and could support and
facilitate placement of complaints. In addition, it will help the Project to ensure the GRM is well
communicated to the rest of community members.
 The type of grievances to be entertained under the LARAP was related to inventory of affected assets,
land ownership disputes, compensation, additional affected assets impacted duringexploration activities.
150. Grievance Redress Mechanism principle is accessible by local communities. “Sekretariat Bersama” will be
established by LG in order to assist PT SMI/project in handling any environmental and social complaints raised
during land acquisition and exploration phase. Following are detailed of the mechanism :
i. An aggrieved PAP may bring any complaint either directly to PT SMI project office (Site Manager and
Comrel) or to the customary leader in the village/sub-village levelor to head of village or head subdistrict
level who will facilitate/bring the grievance to PT SMI project office, in the first instance to seek resolution.
The Project office/customary leaders/head of village/head of subdistrict have5working days from receipt
of grievance to settle the complaints. In this level aggrieved PAP could be put their complaints to the “drop
box” which will put in each sub village and head of subdistrict office ; or send to mobile phone or PT SMI
email.
ii. If the grievance cannot be resolved, the PAP may convey the grievance to the PMU or to the district
rRelated institutional agencies such as Environmental Agency (BLH Kabupaten) and public works agency
who will bring to the PMU for resolution. The Project has 10 working days to settle the complaint. In this
level aggrieved PAP could send their complaint to mobile phone or PT SMI email. The mechanism shown
in the Figure 12-1.
iii. Should the grievances be in larger scale could not be directly resolved by the local community relations
Team, it will go the division of environment, social and advisory service or related divisions in PT. SMI;
 Grievance resolution action plan will include:
- Statement letter of clarification;

- Engagement with complainants and relevant stakeholders;
- Responses via phone; and

- Establishment of memo of approval regarding the proposed grievance mechanism action plan.
 Community Relations Team with the Corporate Secretary will responsible to monitor the way in which
grievances are being handled and ensure they are properly addressed, as well as proper
documentation of the process; and
LARAP
64
 Regular grievance management reports will be produced and included in the periodic environmental
and social management and monitoring implementation report of PMU GEUDP.
LARAP
65
Figure 12-1Grievance Redress Mechanism
LARAP
66
13.Monitoring and Reporting
151. The extent of monitoring activities will be commensurate with the project’s risks and impacts. The purpose of
monitoring and reporting is to: (a) Comply with national regulation and World Bank’s OP 4.12 which has been
adopted in the GEUDP ESMF; (b) Determine effectiveness of institutional arrangements; (c) Identify problems
and remedial actions if any; (d) Identify methods of responding immediately to resolve or mitigate problems;
(e) Verify if the standard of living of displaced persons are restored or improved; (f) Assess sustainability of
income restoration program; and (g) Determine if human and financial resources allocated are adequate and
effective.
152. In addition to recording the progress in compensation payment and other resettlement activities, the Project
will be required to prepare monitoring reports to ensure that the implementation of the resettlement plan has
produced the desired outcomes. The following process will be implemented for monitoring and reporting of
this LARAP:
 PMU Safeguards Team will undertake periodic monitoring of the implementation of the LARAP
implementation components. It will be part of an overall project monitoring and reporting system outlined
in the GEUDP Project Implementation Manual. This will look into the following concerns:
- The number of entitled parties by category of impact per component, progress of land acquisition
implementation including the status of compensation payment, income restoration program and
status of provision of other entitlements. The amount of funds allocated for operations, time
frame, compensation and other entitlements
- Levels of affected person’s satisfaction toward the livelihood restoration program, particularly the
vulnerable and severely PAPs;
- Consultations through various meetings and special meetings with vulnerable groups and
women, level of participation.
- Complaints/grievances that may include consultations organized for LARAP activities,

knowledge of LARAP and entitlements by the PAPs, information and use of grievance redress
mechanism, and any outstanding issues requiring action from the management.
- Affected public facilities and infrastructure are restored promptly; and

- Implementation problems encountered and solutions.
 As deemed necessary by the World Bank and PT. SMI, PMU safeguards team will engage an independent
monitoring agencyto review and evaluate the involuntary land acquisition, and livelihood restoration
processes.
 Development of a land acquisition implementation report at the end of the whole land acquisition process
to be submitted to the Ministry of Finance and World Bank.
LARAP
67
14.Bibliography
Central Bureau of Statistics of Manggarai Barat Regency. (2017). Manggarai Barat Regency in Figures 2017.
Manggarai Barat Regency: Central Bureau of Statistics of Manggarai Barat Regency.
PT Sarana Multi Infrastrutur. (2016). Geothermal Energy Upstream Development Project, Environmental and
Social Management Framework .
Suhardjo. (1989). Socio-Cultural Nutrition. Bogor: Bogor Agricultural University.
LARAP
68
Appendix A Questionnaire Form
LARAP
69
No. PAP (Project Affected People)
LAND ACQUISITIONSURVEY QUESTIONNAIRE

Wae Sano Geothermal Exploration Project
PT Sarana Multi Infrastruktur
2018
Terima kasih telah menyetujui untuk wawancara dengan saya hari ini tentang klaim lahan Anda dan situasi rumah
tangga Anda. Untuk lebih memahami bagaimana pembebasan lahan Proyek akan memengaruhi Anda dan rumah
tangga Anda, kami telah menyiapkan sejumlah pertanyaan tentang keanggotaan rumah tangga Anda, pendapatan
dan pengeluaran rumah tangga Anda, dan kondisi sosial ekonomi Anda.
Semua jawaban dan informasi akan kami rahasiakan dan tidak dibagikan secara publik. Ini akan digunakan untuk
memungkinkan Proyek agar lebih memahami situasi Anda sehingga langkah-langkah yang tepat dapat dibuat
sesuai kebutuhan bagi masyarakat untuk menyesuaikan dengan perubahan yang diakibatkan oleh Proyek.
Setelah selesaiwawancara, kami akan meminta Anda untuk menandatangani Form Survei untuk menunjukkan
bahwa Anda telah secara sukarela berpartisipasi dalam Survei ini dan menyatakan bahwa semua informasi yang
Anda berikan akurat, sejauh yang dapat Anda sampaikan.
I Nama Responden
II Alamat (Dusun/RT/RW)
No KTP dan/ atau KK

III
(foto)
IV Pewawancara
V Hari/Tanggal wawancara
VI Tanda tangan Responden
VII Pewawancara VIII Supervisor IX Data Entry

Nama: Name: Name:
Tanda tangan: Tanda tangan: Tanda tangan:
LARAP
70
A KARAKTERISTIK RESPONDEN
1. Nama Responden:
2. Jenis kelamin responden:

Status responden di rumah tangga tersebut: a) suami d) menantu
b) istri e) saudara
3.
c) anak f) lainnya, sebutkan: ………..
4. Nama Kepala Keluarga:

5. Jumlah Anggota Keluarga (satu rumah):
6. Umur ……………..... Tahun
No Telp Seluler ……..……................................................................
Alamat (Dusun/RT/RW) ……..……................................................................
7.
Desa.................................. Kecamatan .............................................................
Kabupaten .............................................................
Agama /Kepercayaan
9. a. Islam b. Kristen Protestan c. Hindu
d. Budha d. Kristen Katolik e. Lainnya, sebutkan
................
Status Perkawinan
10.
a. Menikah b. Tidak Menikah c. Janda/Duda
Pendidikan Terakhir
11. a.SD b. SMP/sederajat c. SMU/sederajat
d. PT/ sederajat / Akademi e. Lainnya, sebutkan .......................................
13. Lama Tinggal di wilayah ini .......................... tahun
14. Kesukuan: ……..……................................................................
B. ANGGOTA KELUARGA (sesuai KK)
Jenis Umu Hubungan Status

No Nama Pendidikan Pekerjaan
Kelamin r Keluarga Pernikahan
1
LARAP
71
C.KEPEMILIKAN ASET
1. Aset Bergerak
Kepemilikan
No Aset Bergerak Jumlah Nilai (Rp)
Sejak Tahun
a Motor
b Mobil
c Generator Listrik
Lainnya, sebutkan:
d
------------------------
2. Aset Tidak Bergerak

Material Material
Status MaterialDinding
No BANGUNAN Total Atap Lantai
Kepemilikan* Rumah
Area(m2) Rumah Rumah
a Rumah
Gudang/
tempat
penyimpanan
b hasil
pertanian dan
sejenisnya
c Kios/Warung
Tempat
Usaha lain,
d
sebutkan**
-------------------
Bangunan
lain,
e
sebutkan**
-------------------
*Status Kepemilikan:
a. Sertifikat hak milik
b. Keterangan kepala desa
c. Sertifikat HGB
d. Hak Pinjam Pakai
e. Akta Jual Beli/Hibah
f. Tanpa surat-surat
g. Lainnya, sebutkan
**Misalnya penginapan untuk turis, apabila memiliki rumah kedua, dsb
LARAP
72
D.INVENTARIS ASET LAHAN
Perkebunan (buah-buahan atau

Pertanian (sawah atau ladang)
Apakah lahan tanaman keras lain)
berada di
Persil Sebutkan tanaman Sebutkan tanaman Total Nilai NJOP Sejak tah
rencana
(Sebutkan di atas di atas kebun yang Luas Lahan atau berapa
lokasi proyek/
No lokasi persil sawah/ladang yang masih produktif Pertanian dan Harga Beli memiliki a
sudah Luas Lahan
tanah: Desa dan Luas Lahan masih produktif (menghasilkan Perkebunan Lahan mengol
disurvei (m2)
(a) Dusun) (m2) (menghasilkan pendapatan dalam (m2) (Rp/m2) lahan
proyek
pendapatan dalam 1-5 tahun
(Y/T)* (f)
(b) (d) 1-5 tahun terakhir)** terakhir)*** (h) (i) (j)
(c)
(e) (g)
1 Lokasi 1
2 Lokasi 2
3 Lokasi 3
4 Lokasi 4
5 Lokasi 5
6 Lokasi 6
7 Lokasi 7
8 Lokasi 8
Total Luasan
*Tanyakan dan didata terlebih dahulu lokasi persil tanah yang sudah disurvei proyek
**a. padi; b. jagung; c. lainnya (sebutkan)
***a. kopi; b. pinang; c. kemiri; d. nangka; e. alpukat; f. vanili; g. bambu; h. lainnya (sebutkan)
** ,*** Jawaban bisa lebih dari 1
LARAP
73
E. PENDAPATAN
1. Sumber penghidupan rumah tangga*

(termasuk sumber pendapatan/ pekerjaan dari kepala rumah tangga, ibu rumah tangga, dan anggota rumah
tangga lainnya)
a. Pertanian sawah atau ladang
b. Perkebunan
c. Peternakan
d. Pedagang (termasuk toko)
e. Usaha sektor wisata
f. Buruh atau tukang (termasuk buruh lepas perkebunan/pertanian)
g. Pegawai (termasuk pegawai pemerintah, karyawan lain)
h. Pengambilan hasil hutan
i. Bantuan dari pihak lain (misalnya bantuan untuk KK miskin dari pemerintah atau bantuan keluarga
di luar KK)
j. Lainnya, sebutkan: ______________________
*Jawaban bisa lebih dari 1
2. Apabila ada pendapatan di sektor pertanian sawah/ladang dan perkebunan (Pilihan a – b pada No 1 di
atas)
No Sebutkan nama tanaman Tanaman Tanaman Tanaman Tanaman Tanaman

yang masih produktif dalam ____ ____ ____ ____ ____
1-5 tahun terakhir*
a Lokasi tanaman di atas Lokasi
Tanah Persil ke**
b Area tanam(m2) /Jumlah
tanaman(batang)
c Frekuensi panen(dalam 1
tahun)
d Produksi Per sekali panen
e hasil
panen Per tahun
(unit/kg)
f Perkiraan rata-rata pendapatan
kotor sekali musim panen (Rp)
g Perkiraan biaya produksi untuk
sekali musim tanam/musim
panen (Rp)
h Total pendapatan bersih per
musim panen***
i Total pendapatan bersih per
tahun
*Rincian tanaman, baik itu tanaman pertanian sawah/ladang dan perkebunan harus sesuai dengan isian di Tabel
D: tanaman di atas tanah yang masih produktif (menghasilkan pendapatan dalam 1 tahun terakhir)
**Sesuai urutan lokasi persil tanah pada Tabel D
***h = f – g
Catatan: rata-rata pendapatan dan biaya produksi, berdasarkan 1-5 tahun terakhir
LARAP
74
1-5 tahun terakhir*
Tanah Persil ke**
tanaman(batang)
tahun)
e hasil
panen Per tahun
(unit/kg)
panen (Rp)
musim panen***
tahun

1-5 tahun terakhir*
Tanah Persil ke**
tanaman(batang)
tahun)
e hasil
panen Per tahun
(unit/kg)
panen (Rp)
musim panen***
tahun
3. Apabila ada lahan yang tidak dikerjakan sendiri: disewakan atau digarap orang lain
(Sesuai jawaban pada Tabel D Kolom (k))
a. Bagaimana mekanisme sewa/ bagi hasil dengan pemilik lahan? Jelaskan

a.1 pembagian hasil panen
a.2dengan pembayaran sewa tanah per tahun
a.3sebutkan lainnya: ___________________________________________
b. Berapa pendapatan dari lahan yang disewakan atau digarap orang lain, dalam 1-5 tahun terakhir?
LARAP
75
Lokasi Persil* Pendapatan per Musim Panen (Rp) Pendapatan per Tahun (Rp)
1
2
3
4
5
TOTAL (Rp)
*sesuai urutan pada Tabel D
4. Apabila ada pendapatan dari peternakan(Pilihan c pada No 1 di atas)
Lainnya Lainnya
Kerbau Babi Ayam Bebek _____ _____
Jumlah ternak
Ternak untuk:
(a). Jual; atau
(b) Konsumsi RT
Sudah berapa lama dipelihara
(berapa bulan)
Harga jual/ beli (Rp/hewan)
5. Apabila ada pendapatan di luar pertanian(Pilihan d – g pada No 1 di atas)
Pendapatan per Bulan Pendapatan per Tahun

No Sumber Pendapatan*
(Rp) (Rp)
TOTAL (Rp)
*Sesuai jawaban No 1 di atas
LARAP
76
6. Apabila ada sumber penghidupan rumah tangga dari pengambilan hasil hutan(Pilihan h pada No 1 di
atas)
Rata-rata Rata-rata
Kebiasaan pendapatan dari pendapatan dari
Mengambil hasil
No Hasil Hutan* pengambilan menjual hasil menjual hasil
hutan untuk***
hasil hutan** hutan – sekali hutan dalam 1
pergi (Rp) tahun (Rp)
a
b
c
d
e
*Sebutkan, bisa berupa tanaman hewan
**Pengambilan: (a) setiap hari; (b) setiap bulan; (c) berapa kali dalam 1 bulan, sebutkan: ___; (d) berapa kali
dalam 1 tahun, sebutkan
***Tujuan: (a) dijual; (b) konsumsi, misalnya berburu hewan; (c) untuk kebutuhan rumah tangga, misalnya
memasak; (d) ambil kayu untuk buat rumah; (e) untuk obat-obatan
7. Apabila mendapat bantuan dari pihak lain(Pilihan i pada No 1 di atas)
a. Jelaskan bantuan apa saja dari pihak lain yang menjadi sumber penghidupan rumah tangga
a.1 Bantuan untuk KK miskin atau sejenisnya dari pemerintah

a.2 Bantuan dari anggota rumah tangga yang tinggal di lokasi lain (sudah tidak lagi 1 rumah/ 1 KK)
a.3 sebutkan lainnya: ____________________________________________________

b. Besar bantuan yang didapat
Rata-rata besar
Rata-rata besar
Jenis Bantuan dari Frekuensi bantuan sekali dapat
bantuan sekali dapat
No Pihak Lain (seperti di mendapatkan (berdasarkan -5
dalam 1 tahun
Point 7.a di atas) bantuan* tahun terakhir)
(Rp)
(Rp)
1
2
3
4
5
*Frekuensi: (a) setiap bulan; (b) setahun sekali; (c) setahun lebih dari satu kali; (d) hanya pernah
mendapatkan 1 kali; (e) sebutkan lainnya
LARAP
77
F. PENGELUARAN RUMAH TANGGA
Pengeluaran
No Komponen Pengeluara
Per bulan (Rp) Per tahun (Rp)
1 Pengeluaran utama
a Belanja untuk konsumsi bulanan
b Biaya sekolah
c Lainnya
2 Pengeluaran khusus
a Sebutkan:
b Sebutkan:
Total Pengeluaran
G. PENGETAHUAN DAN PERSEPSI MENGENAI PENGADAAN LAHAN PROYEK
1. Apakah Anda mengetahui tentang rencana pembangunan proyek?

(a) Ya(b) Tidak
2. Apakah anda mengetahui rencana pengadaan lahan untuk pembangunan proyek?

(a) Ya(b) Tidak
3. Apakah Anda menghadiri sosialisasi/konsultasi proyek yang dilakukan proyek terkait rencana pengadaan
lahan?
(a) Ya, berapa kali? _____ (b) Tidak
4. Jika tidak hadir sosialisasi, darimana Anda mengetahui tentang rencana pengadaan lahan untuk proyek?
(a) Tetangga/ obrolan masyarakat di desa
(b) Kepala Desa
(c) Dari Tim Survey yang mendata lahan
(d) Sebutkan lainnya: _________________
5. Apabila mengetahui tentang rencana pengadaan lahan (Menjawab Ya pada pertanyaan No.2), apakah Anda
mengetahui skema pengadaan lahan untuk proyek?
(a) Ya, sebutkan: (i) Jual Beli (ii) Sewa (iii) Sebutkan lainnya _____________
(b) Tidak
6. Apakah anda memiliki kekhawatiran dengan adanya rencana pengadaan lahan?

(a) Ya(b) Tidak
7. Jika Ya (pada pertanyaan No.6), sebutkan satu-satu pilihan di bawah untuk dijawab: (i) Ya atau (ii) Tidak
(a) Terkait kejelasan mekanisme pengadaan lahan
(b) Kesesuaian dengan mekanisme pengadaan lahan yang diinginkan
(c) Terkait harga jual/sewa
(d) Apabila sewa, berapa lama waktu sewa
(e) TIdak memiliki lahan lain untuk bertani/ berusaha
(f) Khawatir dampak proyek, sebutkan _____________
(g) Sebutkan apa bila ada kekhawatiran lainnya: _______________
8. Jika Ya (pada pertanyaan No.6), Apakah anda bersedia lahan digunakan untuk pembangunan proyek?
LARAP
78
(a) Ya(b) Tidak
9. Jika Ya (pada pertanyaan No.8 di atas), Apakah anda bersedia menghadiri pertemuan negosiasi dengan
Tim Proyek?
(a) Ya(b) Tidak
10. Apabila ada kekhawatiran (ada jawaban Ya pada No.7), Apakah Anda mengetahui kemana harus
menyampaikan kekhawatiran kepada Tim Proyek?
(a) Ya, sebutkan ke mana jalur penyampaikan keluhan menurut masyarakat ___________
(b) Tidak
H. CLOSING
1. Apakah ada hal lain yang ingin Anda sampaikan sekarang?
______________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________
LARAP
79
LARAP
80

Land Acquisition and Resettlement Action Plan (LARAP) For Waesano Geothermal Exploration Project Manggarai Barat Regency, Nusa Tenggara Timur Province, Indonesia

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Land Acquisition and Resettlement Action Plan (LARAP) For Waesano Geothermal Exploration Project Manggarai Barat Regency, Nusa Tenggara Timur Province, Indonesia

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Land Acquisition and Resettlement Action Plan (LARAP) For Waesano Geothermal Exploration Project Manggarai Barat Regency, Nusa Tenggara Timur Province, Indonesia

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Land Acquisition and Resettlement Action

AMDAL Analisis Mengenai Dampak Lingkunganor Environmental Impact Assessment

1.2. Scope of LARAP

5. This LARAP is prepared by referring to the final design for:

 Section 1: Introduction of the report, background; objectives and report structure;

 Section 8: Consultation, Participation and Information Disclosure describes historical stakeholder

 Section 9: Organisational Arrangement and Responsibilities presents organisational arrangement and

2.2. Project Location

 Cut and filled at Km 27.4 Trans Flores Public Road; and

Table 3-1Land Requirement

Estimated Area of Affected

Project Affected Peoples Male HH 55 20

Affected secondary structures (i.e. hut)

3.3. Vulnerable People

3.4. Severely PAPs

Vulnerable Category Severely Impacted Category

10. Arnoldus Viktor Terang √ √

11. Siprianus Sudarti √ √

12. Anastasia Anu √ √ √ √

13. Donatus Hana √ √ √

14. Ismail Sion √ √ √

17. Yohanes Bechemans Pedo √ √

18. Maksimus Mal √

19. Tinus Baru √ √ √

21. Eduardus F.H.W. Medang √

22. Yohanes (Ian) Harung √ √

23. Nikolaus Olen √ √ √

24. Martinus Maksi √ √

25. Fransiskus Toka Mose √

Maria Margarita Muen √

28. Marselus Sambul √ √

29. Frederikus Janu √ √ √

30. Damasius Daman √ √

31. Alosyus Huladarma √ √

32. Mateus Aku √ √ √

33. Yusup Saban √ √

34. Andreas Jebarus √ √

37. Aloysius Datut √ √ √

38. Markus Masi √ √ √

39. Nico Gego √ √ √

40. Damianus Daud (Damidau) √ √

41. Yosep Ance √ √ √

42. Belasius Sijaga √ √

43. Serpatius Senaman √

44. Siprianus Jalu √ √

45. Raimundus Rabu √ √

46. Maria Mia √

47. Valentinus Emang √ √

48. Yoseph Erwin Rahmat √ √

49. Kanis Hola √

50. Sisi Nalus √ √

51. Tomas Turuk √ √ √

52. Adrianus Handu √ √ √

53. Andrianus Stefani √

54. Yosep Subi √ √

55. Nikolaus Ambuk √ √

56. Damianus Ndalung √ √

57. Yohanes Aben √ √