Carte
Carte
February 2017
Issue Overview
abreast of advances in the field while simultaneously developing lifelong self-directed learning
skills.
Learning Objectives
Upon completion of this Continuum: Lifelong Learning in Neurology Cerebrovascular Disease
issue, participants will be able to:
Describe the epidemiology of ischemic stroke and its associated risk factors and summarize
the best evidence for managing stroke risk factors for prevention of recurrent stroke
Perform key elements in the bedside evaluation of the patient with acute stroke, including the
focused stroke history, essential aspects of the bedside examination, and initial brain
imaging, and recognize anatomic stroke syndromes and common mimics
Discuss the main indications and contraindications of acute reperfusion therapies for
ischemic stroke
Diagnose and manage transient ischemic attack and minor stroke and distinguish high-risk
transient ischemic attacks from more benign transient events
Discuss common early and late medical complications following acute ischemic stroke
Evaluate and manage patients with large artery atherosclerotic occlusive disease of the head
and neck
Discuss the risk factors, recurrence risk, evaluation, and outcomes of arterial ischemic stroke
in children and young adults
Discuss the natural history of and general management and treatment options for unruptured
intracranial aneurysms and vascular malformations of the brain
List recommended steps for practical conflict mediation in situations in which surrogates of
patients with severe stroke request life-prolonging treatment thatclinicians believe I s
potentially inappropriate
Recognize the usefulness of telestroke and its potential to improve acute stroke care in
underserved communities
Core Competencies
This Continuum: Lifelong Learning in Neurology Cerebrovascular Disease issue covers the
following core competencies:
Patient Care
Medical Knowledge
Practice-Based Learning and Improvement
Interpersonal and Communication Skills
Professionalism
Systems-Based Practice
Disclosures
CONTRIBUTORS
Samir R. Belagaje, MD
Assistant Professor of Neurology and Rehabilitation Medicine, Emory University School of
Medicine; Director of Stroke Rehabilitation, Marcus Stroke and Neuroscience Center, Grady
Memorial Hospital, Atlanta, Georgia
a
Dr Belagaje reports no disclosure.
b
Dr Belagaje discusses the unlabeled/investigational use of fluoxetine for poststroke motor recovery treatment,
cholinesterase inhibitors and memantine for the treatment of aphasia, and dopaminergic agents to aid in the
treatment of poststroke depression.
Kelly D. Flemming, MD
Consultant in Department of Neurology; Associate Professor of Medicine, Mayo Clinic,
Rochester, Minnesota
a
Dr Flemming reports no disclosure.
b
Dr Flemming discusses the unlabeled/investigational use of statins and fasudil for the treatment of cavernous
malformation.
Amy Guzik, MD
Assistant Professor, Neurology, Wakeforest Baptist Medical Center, Winston Salem, North
Carolina
a,b
Dr Guzik reports no disclosures.
Josephine F. Huang, MD
Instructor of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida
a
Dr Huang reports no disclosure.
b
Dr Huang discusses the unlabeled/investigational use of tranexamic acid and ε-aminocaproic acid for intracranial
hemorrhage.
David Y. Hwang, MD
Assistant Professor, Division of Neurocritical Care and Emergency Neurology, Yale School of
Medicine; Neurointensivist, Yale-New Haven Hospital, New Haven, Connecticut
a
Dr Hwang has received personal compensation for speaking engagements for the Mayo Clinic and The
Pennsylvania State University and research/grant support from the American Brain Foundation, the Apple Pickers
Foundation, the Neurocritical Care Society, and the National Institute on Aging, via its Loan Repayment Program.
b
Dr Hwang reports no disclosure.
William Jones, MD
Associate Professor of Neurology; Division Chief, Neurohospitalist and Vascular Neurology,
University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, Department of Neurology, Aurora, Colorado
Pearce J. Korb, MD
Assistant Professor of Neurology, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus,
Department of Neurology, Aurora, Colorado
a,b
Dr Korb reports no disclosures.
Giuseppe Lanzino, MD
Professor of Neurosurgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
a
Dr Lanzino serves as a consultant for Medtronic.
b
Dr Lanzino discusses the unlabeled/investigational use of statins and fasudil for the treatment of cavernous
malformation.
Warren D. Lo, MD
Clinical Professor, Departments of Pediatrics and Neurology, Ohio State University; Pediatric
Neurologist, Nationwide Children’s Hospital, Columbus, Ohio
a
Dr Lo receives research/grant support from the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and
Human Development (5R01HD068345, 1R01HD074574, R01HD083384) and the National Institute of Neurological
Disorders and Stroke (U10NS086484, U54 NS065705) and receives publishing royalties from Springer.
b
Dr Lo discusses the unlabeled/investigational use of antithrombotic and thrombolytic agents in children with
stroke.
Adam Kelly, MD
Associate Professor of Neurology, University of Rochester Medical Center; Chief of Neurology,
Highland Hospital, Rochester, New York
a
Dr Kelly has received research support from the Donald W. Reynolds Foundation.
b
Dr Kelly reports no disclosure.
a
Relationship Disclosure
b
Unlabeled Use of Products/Investigational Use Disclosure
abreast of advances in the field while simultaneously developing lifelong self-directed learning
skills. In Continuum, the process of absorbing, integrating, and applying the material presented is
neurologist in a lively, interactive format; fostering self-assessment and lifelong study skills;
encouraging critical thinking; and, in the final analysis, strengthening and improving patient
care.
Each Continuum issue is prepared by distinguished faculty who are acknowledged leaders in
their respective fields. Six issues are published annually and are composed of review articles,
case-based discussions on ethical and practice issues related to the issue topic, coding
management problem. For detailed instructions regarding Continuum CME and self-assessment
and vignettes are used liberally, as are tables and illustrations. Video material relating to the
The text can be reviewed and digested most effectively by establishing a regular schedule of
study in the office or at home, either alone or in an interactive group. If subscribers use such
regular and perhaps new study habits, Continuum’s goal of establishing lifelong learning patterns
can be met.
Cerebrovascular Disease
Volume 23 Number 1 February 2017
CONTRIBUTORS
Kevin M. Barrett, MD, MSc, Guest Editor
Associate Professor, Vice Chair, Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic Florida,
Jacksonville, Florida
aDr Barrett serves on the editorial board of Neurology, has received research/grant support
from the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke for serving on the executive
committees of the CREST-2 and SHINE clinical trials, and receives publishing royalties from
Wiley Blackwell.
bDr Barrett reports no disclosure.
Samir R. Belagaje, MD
Assistant Professor of Neurology and Rehabilitation Medicine, Emory University
School of Medicine; Director of Stroke Rehabilitation, Marcus Stroke and
Neuroscience Center, Grady Memorial Hospital, Atlanta, Georgia
aDr Belagaje reports no disclosure.
bDr Belagaje discusses the unlabeled/investigational use of fluoxetine for poststroke motor
recovery treatment, cholinesterase inhibitors and memantine for the treatment of aphasia,
and dopaminergic agents to aid in the treatment of poststroke depression.
aRelationship Disclosure
bUnlabeled Use of Products/Investigational Use Disclosure
CONTRIBUTORS continued
Shelagh B. Coutts, MD, MSc, FRCPC
Stroke Neurologist; Associate Professor, Departments of Clinical Neuroscience,
Radiology, Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Hotchkiss Brain
Institute, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
aDr Coutts receives research/grant support from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research,
(CRH-112319), the Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada (G-16-00012585),
and Genome Canada (143TIA-Penn).
bDr Coutts reports no disclosure.
Kelly D. Flemming, MD
Consultant in Department of Neurology; Associate Professor of Medicine,
Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
aDr Flemming reports no disclosure.
bDr Flemming discusses the unlabeled/investigational use of statins and fasudil for the
treatment of cavernous malformation.
Amy Guzik, MD
Assistant Professor, Neurology, Wakeforest Baptist Medical Center,
Winston Salem, North Carolina
a,bDr Guzik reports no disclosures.
Josephine F. Huang, MD
Instructor of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida
aDr Huang reports no disclosure.
bDr Huang discusses the unlabeled/investigational use of tranexamic acid
and ε-aminocaproic acid for intracranial hemorrhage.
aRelationship Disclosure
bUnlabeled Use of Products/Investigational Use Disclosure
CONTRIBUTORS continued
David Y. Hwang, MD
Assistant Professor, Division of Neurocritical Care and Emergency Neurology,
Yale School of Medicine; Neurointensivist, Yale-New Haven Hospital,
New Haven, Connecticut
aDr Hwang has received personal compensation for speaking engagements for the Mayo Clinic
and The Pennsylvania State University and research/grant support from the American Brain
Foundation, the Apple Pickers Foundation, the Neurocritical Care Society, and the National
Institute on Aging, via its Loan Repayment Program.
bDr Hwang reports no disclosure.
William Jones, MD
Associate Professor of Neurology; Division Chief, Neurohospitalist and Vascular
Neurology, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, Department of
Neurology, Aurora, Colorado
a,bDr Jones reports no disclosures.
Pearce J. Korb, MD
Assistant Professor of Neurology, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical
Campus, Department of Neurology, Aurora, Colorado
a,bDr Korb reports no disclosures.
Giuseppe Lanzino, MD
Professor of Neurosurgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
aDr Lanzino serves as a consultant for Medtronic.
bDr Lanzino discusses the unlabeled/investigational use of statins and fasudil for the
treatment of cavernous malformation.
aRelationship Disclosure
bUnlabeled Use of Products/Investigational Use Disclosure
CONTRIBUTORS continued
Warren D. Lo, MD
Clinical Professor, Departments of Pediatrics and Neurology,
Ohio State University; Pediatric Neurologist, Nationwide Children’s Hospital,
Columbus, Ohio
aDr Lo receives research/grant support from the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute
of Child Health and Human Development (5R01HD068345, 1R01HD074574, R01HD083384)
and the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (U10NS086484,
U54 NS065705) and receives publishing royalties from Springer.
bDr Lo discusses the unlabeled/investigational use of antithrombotic and thrombolytic
agents in children with stroke.
aRelationship Disclosure
bUnlabeled Use of Products/Investigational Use Disclosure
Adam Kelly, MD
Associate Professor of Neurology, University of Rochester Medical Center; Chief
of Neurology, Highland Hospital, Rochester, New York
aDr Kelly has received research support from the Donald W. Reynolds Foundation.
bDr Kelly reports no disclosure
aRelationship Disclosure
bUnlabeled Use of Products/Investigational Use Disclosure
In the October 2016 issue of Continuum (Neuroimaging, Vol 22, Issue 5), the following error
occurred:
In “Imaging for Adults With Seizures and Epilepsy” by Samuel LaPalme-Remis, MDCM, MA,
FRCPC, and Gregory D. Cascino, MD, FAAN (Continuum: Lifelong Learning in Neurology
2016;22:1467), the text incorrectly states, “These seizures are difficult to fully resect and can
progress to higher-grade tumors, threatening patient survival.” The sentence should read,
“These tumors are difficult to fully resect and can progress to higher-grade tumors, threatening
patient survival.”
Lapalme-Remis S, Cascino GD. Imaging for Adults With Seizures and Epilepsy. Continuum (Minneap Minn)
2016;22(5 Neuroimaging):1451Y1479.
Editor’s Preface . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
REVIEW ARTICLES
Stroke Epidemiology and Risk Factor Management . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15
Amy Guzik, MD; Cheryl Bushnell, MD, MHS
Clinical Evaluation of the Patient With Acute Stroke . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40
Andrew M. Southerland, MD, MSc
Treatment of Acute Ischemic Stroke . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 62
Alejandro A. Rabinstein, MD, FAAN
Diagnosis and Management of Transient Ischemic Attack . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 82
Shelagh B. Coutts, MD, MSc, FRCPC
Prevention and Management of Poststroke Complications . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 93
Josephine F. Huang, MD
Cardioembolic Stroke . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 111
Cumara B. O’Carroll, MD, MPH; Kevin M. Barrett, MD, MSc
Large Artery Atherosclerotic Occlusive Disease . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 133
John W. Cole, MD, MS
Arterial Ischemic Stroke in Children and Young Adults . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 158
Warren D. Lo, MD; Riten Kumar, MD, MSc
Management of Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms
and Cerebrovascular Malformations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 181
Kelly D. Flemming, MD; Giuseppe Lanzino, MD
Inherited and Uncommon Causes of Stroke . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 211
Jennifer Juhl Majersik, MD, MS
Stroke Rehabilitation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 238
Samir R. Belagaje, MD
PRACTICE ISSUES
Remote Evaluation of the Patient With Acute Stroke . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 259
Bart M. Demaerschalk, MD, MSc, FAHA, FRCPC
Coding in Stroke and Other Cerebrovascular Diseases . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 268
Complete text is available as online-only content in this issue at ContinuumJournal.com
and on the Continuum apps
Pearce J. Korb, MD; William Jones, MD
Index . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 300
List of Abbreviations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Back Cover
ERRATUM
s Describe the epidemiology of ischemic stroke and its associated risk factors
and summarize the best evidence for managing stroke risk factors for prevention
of recurrent stroke
Perform key elements in the bedside evaluation of the patient with acute
s
stroke, including the focused stroke history, essential aspects of the bedside
examination, and initial brain imaging, and recognize anatomic stroke
syndromes and common mimics
Discuss the main indications and contraindications of acute reperfusion therapies
s
ischemic stroke
Discuss the comprehensive evaluation of cardioembolic stroke and outline current
s
management options
Evaluate and manage patients with large artery atherosclerotic occlusive disease of the
s
causes of stroke
Discuss the natural history of stroke as well as established pharmacologic and
s
Core Competencies
This Continuum: Lifelong Learning in Neurology Cerebrovascular Disease
issue covers the following core competencies:
Patient Care
s
Medical Knowledge
s
Professionalism
s
Systems-Based Practice
s
in the Management
of Infarctions
This issue of Continuum emergency treatment of
is devoted to the diag- acute ischemic stroke,
nosis, management, and with particular emphasis
counseling of patients on IV thrombolysis and
with stroke or who are the decision-making pro-
at risk for stroke. To cess with regard to me-
achieve this goal, Guest chanical thrombectomy.
Editor Dr Kevin M. Dr Shelagh B. Coutts next
Barrett, associate pro- discusses the diagnosis
fessor and vice chair of and management of tran-
the department of neu- sient ischemic attacks and
rology at Mayo Clinic the need for, and specifics
Florida, has assembled of, urgent assessment for
an impressive group of etiologic investigation to
This issue of Continuum
experts to update us on inform the optimal pre-
is devoted to the
the cerebrovascular dis- ventive therapy in an in-
diagnosis, management,
eases, including current dividual patient with
and counseling of
information to guide our transient ischemic attack.
patients with stroke
diagnosis and manage- Dr Josephine F. Huang
or who are at risk
ment of patients with provides us with a review
for stroke.
acute ischemic stroke, of the immediate and
for which rapid assess- delayed medical compli-
ment, adherence to protocols, and an cations that can occur after a stroke,
effective multidisciplinary system of emphasizing prevention and manage-
care are essential for optimal outcomes. ment of these complications. Drs Cumara
The issue begins with the article by B. O’Carroll and Kevin M. Barrett next
Drs Amy Guzik and Cheryl Bushnell, discuss cardioembolic stroke, an impor-
who provide an overview of stroke tant potentially preventable cause of
epidemiology and risk factor manage- ischemic stroke, highlight the diverse
ment to inform the preventive manage- underlying mechanisms and their as-
ment of patients at risk for stroke or sessment, and summarize the current
recurrent stroke. Next, Dr Andrew M. options for prevention based on the
Southerland provides an underpinning defined mechanism. Dr John W. Cole
for the rest of the issue with regard to then reviews large artery atherosclerotic
the bedside clinical evaluation of pa- occlusive disease (including asymptom-
tients with acute stroke, advising us to atic and symptomatic extracranial carotid
“Be quick, but don’t hurry,” while also stenosis, intracranial atherosclerosis,
reminding us of relevant neurovascular and extracranial vertebral artery athero-
anatomy and clinical stroke syndromes. sclerotic disease) and the current roles
Dr Alejandro A. Rabinstein then reviews of medical, surgical, and endovascular
the current state of the art in the therapy in each of these scenarios.
Continuum (Minneap Minn) 2017;23(1):13–14 ContinuumJournal.com 13
Drs Warren D. Lo and Riten Kumar Drs Pearce J. Korb and William Jones
review the risk factors, recurrence risk, use an illustrative example of a patient
and evaluation and management of presenting with acute ischemic stroke
arterial ischemic stroke in children and to illustrate the issues involved in
young adults, emphasizing the impor- diagnostic and evaluation and manage-
tance of clinicians recognizing that ment coding of patients with stroke.
patients of these age groups may have As with every issue of Continuum,
particular and potentially remediable several opportunities exist for CME.
impairments in cognition and mood as After reading the issue and taking the
sequelae of their strokes. Drs Kelly D. Postreading Self-Assessment and CME
Flemming and Giuseppe Lanzino next Test written by Drs Douglas J. Gelb
summarize the epidemiology, natural and Adam G. Kelly, you may earn up to
history, and various management strat- 12 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditsTM
egies for unruptured intracranial aneu- toward self-assessment and CME.
rysms, arteriovenous malformations, Readers will note a new format in this
cavernous malformations, developmen- issue’s CME section, where the ques-
tal venous anomalies, and capillary tions are no longer repeated in the
telangiectasias, information that is crit- Preferred Responses section, a move
ical for us to use as we counsel our that will keep our print issues a bit
patients when these lesions are discov- more environmentally friendly. We
ered, often incidentally. welcome readers’ opinions about this
Dr Jennifer Juhl Majersik reviews new format for presenting the answers
many of the inherited monogenic dis- to the multiple-choice questions. The
orders that may cause stroke that clini- Patient Management Problem, written
cians need to be aware of and discusses by Dr Barrett, describes the case of a
the diagnosis and management of other 78-year-old man who presents with an
important but relatively uncommon acute left hemiplegia. By following this
causes of stroke, including moyamoya patient’s case and answering multiple-
disease, cerebral amyloid angiopathy, choice questions corresponding to
and pregnancy-associated stroke. In the diagnostic and management decision
final review article of the issue, Dr Samir points along his course, you will have
R. Belagaje reviews the principles of the opportunity to earn up to 2 AMA
neurorehabilitation that inform the opti- PRA Category 1 CME Credits.
mal poststroke outcomes of our patients. I am indebted to Dr Barrett for his
In this issue’s Ethical and Medicole- insightful leadership and extreme dedi-
gal Issues section, Dr David Y. Hwang cation to this issue throughout the
uses the case example of a patient with process, and I would also like to thank
a devastating posterior circulation infarc- him and each of the expert contributors
tion to discuss the ethical issues involved to this issue for providing us with such
when surrogate decision makers request well-written articles that share their ex-
life-prolonging treatment that members perience and expertise, which we can all
of the care team may believe to be futile. use to inform the timely and accurate
In the Practice Issues article, Dr Bart M. diagnosis and management of our pa-
Demaerschalk provides his state-of-the tients with acute stroke and other cerebro-
art review of the history, principles, and vascular diseases to optimize outcomes.
practice of telestroke for the remote
evaluation of the patient with acute
stroke. In the Coding article (accessible VSteven L. Lewis, MD, FAAN
online and on the Continuum apps), Editor-in-Chief
Stroke Epidemiology
Address correspondence to
Dr Cheryl Bushnell,
Department of Neurology,
Wake Forest Baptist Health,
KEY POINT
h Stroke incidence and
mortality have declined
in recent decades,
correlating with
improved risk factor
management.
33.7% from 2003 to 2013.2 The rate of versus 58.9% decline).2 Differences in
recurrent stroke is declining as well. stroke risk are seen with race and eth-
In control patients pooled from stroke nicity as well. Overall, the stroke in-
prevention trials, the annual rate of cidence was higher in blacks than in
recurrent stroke fell from 8.71% in the whites in the REasons for Geographic
1960s to 4.98% in the 2000s,7 with the And Racial Differences in Stroke
current annual rate estimated to be (REGARDS) cohort, although this dis-
between 3% and 4%.8 Recurrent stroke parity was more prominent in the
is associated with a larger risk factor young, with a black to white incidence
burden,9 and improvements in stroke rate ratio of 4.02 in those 45 to 54 years
prevention over recent decades corre- of age and 0.86 in those over 85 years
spond to improved risk factor manage- of age.13 While a decline in incidence
ment, including higher rates of statin was seen in whites between 1990 and
(4% to 41.4%) and antihypertensive 2005, stroke incidence remained the
(53% to 73.5%) use between 1992 same in blacks.14 The mean age of
and 2008.6 stroke death is younger in blacks than
Unfortunately, disparities in stroke whites,2 and while death rates declined
risk exist, and the decline has not been by about 50% in all racial groups, rates
universal across all subgroups of the remain higher in blacks (65.7% versus
population. While stroke is more com- 46.9% in whites and 39.6% in Asians).2
mon in men than women when young Mexican Americans are also seen to have
and middle-aged,10 women have a a higher stroke incidence in younger
higher lifetime risk of stroke than men age groups and younger age at stroke
(20% to 21% versus 14% to 17%) with death than non-Hispanic whites.2,15
poorer functional outcomes.11,12 A In the United States, perhaps the
greater decline in age-adjusted death most dramatic are the geographic dis-
rate was seen in men than women be- parities. Mortality is 20% higher in the
tween 1981 and 2013 (61.4% decline stroke belt, identified as North Carolina,
FIGURE 1-2 US stroke death rates from 2011 to 2013, adults 35 years of age and older, by county.
Reprinted from Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.16 cdc.gov/dhdsp/maps/national_maps/stroke_all.htm.
KEY POINT
h The recommended condition and are treated, only about 120 mm Hg had significantly reduced
blood pressure targets half have blood pressure that is con- risk of the primary composite end point
are less than trolled.2 Hypertension is particularly (myocardial infarction, acute coronary
140/90 mm Hg in prevalent in blacks, affecting 41% of syndrome, stroke, acute heart failure, or
patients with an men and 44% of women. High blood death from cardiovascular disease
ischemic stroke and pressures occur much earlier in life in events) than those randomly assigned
less than 130/80 mm Hg blacks than whites,2 and the higher sys- to a target less than 140 mm Hg.24 How-
in patients with a small tolic blood pressure explains about 50% ever, patients with prior stroke were ex-
vessel distribution of the excess risk of stroke in this ethnic cluded by design, and no difference was
ischemic stroke. group compared to whites.21 seen in stroke events during follow-up
What is the optimal goal blood pres- between the two treatment groups.24
sure for stroke prevention, and what is The significance of these findings is un-
the threshold for pharmacologic treat- clear for stroke primary prevention.
ment? These questions, which may be Most neurologists will be involved in
most relevant to primary care providers, the care of patients who have already
were addressed in an evidence-based had a stroke, and therefore recommen-
review and guideline recommendations dations from the AHA/American Stroke
from the Eighth Joint National Commit- Association (ASA) Guidelines for the Pre-
tee (JNC 8).22 The panel recommended vention of Stroke in Patients With Stroke
that individuals over 60 years of age or Transient Ischemic Attack8 are the
be treated for blood pressure of most relevant. The recommendations
150/90 mm Hg or more, whereas for are to initiate blood pressure therapy
those under 60 years of age, blood pres- for patients whose blood pressure re-
sure should be treated if greater than mains above 140/90 mm Hg or to re-
140/90 mm Hg (the latter based on ex- sume blood pressureYlowering therapy
pert opinion because of lack of evi- for those with hypertension, both of
dence).22 Those with diabetes mellitus which would be started several days
or chronic kidney disease should have after stroke onset. The specific target is
a goal blood pressure of less than individualized, but a reasonable goal is
140/90 mm Hg. The American Heart less than 140/90 mm Hg and, for those
Association (AHA) published an ad- with lacunar strokes, a target systolic
visory the same year as JNC 8, which blood pressure of less than 130 mm Hg.8
does not distinguish age as a factor in Which blood pressureYlowering strat-
the decision to treat blood pressure, egies are best? Several categories of
rather using the presence of stage 1 blood pressureYlowering medications
hypertension, ie, blood pressure that exist, but those that have been most
is 140 mm Hg to 159 mm Hg systolic extensively tested in the setting of
and 90 mm Hg to 99 mm Hg diastolic.23 secondary prevention of stroke include
What is important from both guidelines angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibi-
is the emphasis on lifestyle change, tors, thiazide diuretics, and calcium
such as exercise and diet, regardless of channel blockers. The AHA/ASA second-
age, diabetes mellitus, chronic kidney ary prevention guideline does not rec-
disease, or stage of hypertension. Of ommend a specific regimen because no
note, the Systolic Blood Pressure Inter- comparative effectiveness trials of these
vention Trial (SPRINT), published after strategies have been conducted. The best
the two guidelines previously de- evidence points toward treatment with
scribed, was stopped early because the diuretics and angiotensin-converting
group randomly assigned to intensive enzyme inhibitors, but consideration
blood pressure treatment to below should also be given to specific patient
18 ContinuumJournal.com February 2017
and should include salt restriction; four groups of individuals deemed likely
weight loss; a diet rich in fruits, to benefit from moderate- or high-
vegetables, and low-fat dairy products potency statins were the following: (1)
(such as the Dietary Approaches to those with clinical atherosclerotic
Stop Hypertension [DASH] diet27 or cardiovascular disease, (2) those with
the Mediterranean diet28); regular aer- LDL-C higher than 190 mg/dL, (3) those
obic physical activity; and limited who are 40 to 75 years of age with dia-
alcohol consumption.8 betes mellitus and LDL-C 70 mg/dL to
189 mg/dL, and (4) those without clini-
Hyperlipidemia cal atherosclerotic cardiovascular dis-
The evaluation and treatment of hy- ease or diabetes mellitus who are 40 to
perlipidemia is such a critical part of 75 years of age with LDL-C 70 mg/dL to
stroke management that it is a quality 189 mg/dL and an estimated 10-year
metric monitored by the Centers for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease
Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) risk of 7.5% or higher. These guide-
as well as The Joint Commission. The lines recommend estimating 10-year
cholesterol management guidelines atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease
published jointly by the American risk using a risk calculator (based on
College of Cardiology and the AHA in pooled cohort equations). The sec-
2013 provided a new perspective on ondary prevention guidelines also rec-
treatment with statins, with a move- ommend intensive statin therapy for
ment away from a specific low-density patients with stroke or transient ische-
lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) target mic attack (TIA) presumed to be of
and toward a focus on treatment with atherosclerotic origin and initiation
statins that are likely to lower choles- of therapy for LDL-C 100 mg/dL or
terol by 50% or more (high-potency higher with or without evidence of
statins) or by 30% to 50% (moderate- clinical atherosclerotic cardiovascu-
potency statins) (Table 1-1).29 The lar disease.8 Secondary prevention
KEY POINT
h Atherosclerotic causes was of atherosclerotic origin and
of ischemic stroke or the TABLE 1-1 Low-, Moderate-, and whether LDL-C is higher than 100 mg/dL.8
High-Potency Statins In addition to statin therapy, both guide-
finding of a low-density
Recommended
lipoprotein level higher lines encourage a heart-healthy diet for
for Atherosclerotic
than 100 mg/dL should Cardiovascular Diseasea lowering cholesterol, which is described
be treated with a in more detail later in this article.
high-potency statin. In routine practice, many patients
b High-Potency Statin Therapy
(Daily dose lowers LDL-C by are reluctant to start statins because of
approximately Q50% on the high risk of myopathy or general
average) muscle pain, which varies from 7% to
Atorvastatin 40Y80 mg 29% in the literature.30 Statin-associated
myopathy is more likely with female
Rosuvastatin 20 or 40 mg
sex, older age, frailty, surgery, and mul-
b Moderate-Potency Statin tiple medications, among other factors,
Therapy (Daily dose lowers
so it is important to consider these risks
LDL-C by approximately 30%
to G50% on average) when initiating statins.31 Focusing on
women, an analysis of pooled patient
Atorvastatin 10 or 20 mg
level data from six statin trials showed
Rosuvastatin 5 or 10 mg that only one (Incremental Decrease in
Simvastatin 20Y40 mg Endpoints Through Aggressive Lipid
Lowering [IDEAL], atorvastatin 80 mg
Pravastatin 40 or 80 mg
versus simvastatin 20 mg to 40 mg) was
Lovastatin 40 mg associated with a significant interaction
Fluvastatin XL 80 mg between sex and rate of adverse effects.
For women on the high-dose atorvastatin,
Fluvastatin 40 mg
2 times a day 15.1% discontinued atorvastatin versus
4.6% on simvastatin, whereas in men,
Pitavastatin 2Y4 mg
8.3% discontinued atorvastatin versus
b Low-Potency Statin Therapy 4.1% on simvastatin. Multivariable
(Daily dose lowers LDL-C by modeling showed that increasing age,
G30% on average)
higher atorvastatin dose, and number
Simvastatin 10 mg of concomitant medications were pre-
Pravastatin 10Y20 mg dictive of statin discontinuation in both
sexes, and diabetes mellitus was predic-
Lovastatin 20 mg
tive of discontinuation in women, but
Fluvastatin 20Y40 mg not men.32
Pitavastatin 1 mg A helpful algorithm for management
of statin-association muscle symptoms
LDL-C = low-density lipoprotein
cholesterol. was published in 2015 30 in light of the
a
Modified with permission from 2013 cholesterol management guide-
Stone NJ, et al, J Am Coll Cardiol.29
B 2014 The Expert Panel Members. lines and high-potency statins for pre-
sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/ vention of cardiovascular disease and
S0735109713060282.
stroke. If patients have muscle symp-
toms and a creatine kinase (CK) that is
greater than 4 times the upper limit
guidelines essentially concur with the of normal with or without rhabdomy-
American College of Cardiology/AHA olysis, then the statin should be dis-
recommendations but include consid- continued for 6 weeks and CK repeated.
eration of whether the stroke or TIA If the CK normalizes and symptoms
22 ContinuumJournal.com February 2017
Case 1-1B
Review of the records of the patient in Case 1-1A from her stroke hospitalization showed that her
carotid ultrasound showed 50% to 60% internal carotid artery stenosis bilaterally. Her high-density
lipoprotein was 40 mg/dL, and her total cholesterol was 240 mg/dL. A statin was not started at
discharge because she had a history of mild muscle aches on atorvastatin without impairment of
mobility. Her creatine kinase was measured by her primary care provider at the time and was normal.
Comment. With clinical atherosclerotic cerebrovascular disease, as demonstrated by her
extracranial carotid disease and small vessel distribution infarct, a moderate- or high-potency statin
is recommended. In addition, her atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease risk in 10 years was 52.8%
and her lifetime risk was 50% (Figure 1-5). Given the new event and risk that is significantly
higher than someone
her age with optimal
risk factors (2.7%), a
high-potency statin
should be reinitiated,
either atorvastatin or
rosuvastatin,
according to the
guidelines presented
in Table 1-1.
If rechallenge with
the statin leads to
recurrence of muscle
symptoms, then low
or intermittent
dosing with a potent
or efficacious statin
should be considered.
Lifestyle modifications, FIGURE 1-5 Risk calculator results for the patient in Case 1-1B based on age, race, sex, total
cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, treatment for high
such as diet and blood pressure, diabetes mellitus, and smoking.
exercise, should be ASCVD = atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease.
discussed as well.
KEY POINTS
h Disorders of glucose on Assessment, Aetiology, and Manage- progress toward a goal of less than 7%
metabolism are highly ment also specifically recommends in most adults.34 Although oral hypo-
prevalent in patients against the use of supplements, such as glycemic drugs are not recommended
with stroke. Patients coenzyme Q10 or vitamin D, to alleviate for secondary prevention, some sup-
with new-onset stroke muscle symptoms since no evidence of port exists for their use for patients with
or transient ischemic their benefits exists.30 In most settings, stroke. For example, the Prospective
attack should be neurologists will be conducting this Pioglitazone Clinical Trial in Macro-
screened for diabetes management in collaboration with the vascular Events (PROactive) showed that
mellitus with hemoglobin patient’s primary care provider or a among patients with a history of stroke,
A1c or an oral glucose highly specialized lipid clinic.
tolerance test.
pioglitazone was associated with a nearly
50% reduction in recurrent stroke
h Diabetes mellitus and Diabetes Mellitus and (hazard ratio 0.53; 95% confidence
metabolic syndrome are
Metabolic Syndrome interval 0.34Y0.85).35 The recently con-
key risk factors for
first-ever and recurrent Disorders of glucose metabolism are cluded Insulin Resistance Intervention
ischemic stroke; major risk factors for stroke, including After Stroke (IRIS) trial specifically fo-
therefore, management type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus and cused on secondary prevention of
for these conditions prediabetes (defined as hemoglobin A1c stroke in patients with insulin resistance
should include lifestyle of 5.7% to 6.4%). These disorders are and showed a 24% reduction of recur-
and pharmacologic highly prevalent in patients with stroke: rent stroke with pioglitazone (hazard
strategies to reduce the ratio 0.76; 95% confidence interval
28% have prediabetes, and 25% to
hemoglobin A1c to 0.62Y0.93; P=.007).36
45% have diabetes mellitus.8 In addi-
less than 7%.
tion, diabetes mellitus is independently Another important condition that
associated with a 60% risk (hazard ratio often includes impaired glucose me-
1.59; 95% confidence interval 1.07Y2.37) tabolism is metabolic syndrome, a risk
for recurrent stroke in the elderly.33 factor for stroke and cardiovascular
Therefore, the AHA/ASA secondary pre- disease that represents multiple com-
vention guideline recommends that ponents. It is diagnosed when three
patients with new-onset stroke or TIA of the following five risk factors are
should be screened for diabetes mel- present: (1) fasting plasma glucose of
litus with hemoglobin A1c or an oral 100 mg/dL or higher or the patient is
glucose tolerance test.8 Despite the prev- undergoing treatment for increased
alence and the major risk for recurrent glucose; (2) high-density lipoprotein
stroke with diabetes mellitus, the ideal cholesterol (HDL-C) of 40 mg/dL or less
targets for glucose control and the in men or 50 mg/dL or less in women or
treatments needed to reach these goals
the patient is undergoing treatment for
are not fully understood. The American
low HDL-C; (3) triglycerides of 150 mg/dL
Diabetes Association recommends that,
or higher or the patient is undergoing
for most patients with diabetes mellitus,
treatment for high triglycerides; (4)
the target hemoglobin A1c is less than
7%.34 It also recommends participation waist circumference 102 cm (40 in) or
in diabetes mellitus self-management higher in men or 88 cm (34.6 in) or
education and support as well as life- higher in women (may differ by ethnic-
style interventions as the first step to ity); (5) blood pressure 130 mm Hg or
management. Metformin, often initiated higher systolic or 85 mm Hg or higher
at a dose of 500 mg 2 times a day, is the diastolic, or the patient is undergoing
preferred initial pharmacologic agent. drug treatment for hypertension or
Repeat hemoglobin A1c is recommended antihypertensive drug treatment in a
after 3 months of treatment to track patient with a history of hypertension.2
even less well understood. While more an independent role in stroke risk
than 400 brands of e-cigarettes exist, reduction. As large-scale nutritional
they all commonly contain a liquid studies are difficult to conduct, data
mixture of propylene glycol and nico- come primarily from observational or
tine housed in a cartridge or refillable cohort studies. Findings from the
tank. The device heats and aerosolizes Nurses’ Health Study and Health Pro-
the liquid, triggered by inhalation.50 fessionals Follow-Up Study have pro-
Because this method does not con- vided examples of dietary patterns
tain smoke, tar, or other chemicals, associated with lower risk of stroke.
e-cigarettes are marketed as a safe form Increased fruit and vegetable intake was
of nicotine delivery. Very little informa- associated with reduced stroke risk,
tion is available on the health effects of with the highest protective effect from
e-cigarettes; with less than 15 years on cruciferous and green leafy vegetables
the market, sufficient data do not exist and citrus fruits and juices.52 Each
to determine the risk of long-term additional one serving per day was
toxicity leading to cerebrovascular or associated with a 6% lower risk of
cardiovascular disease. The AHA policy ischemic stroke (relative risk, 0.94;
statement maintains that e-cigarette 95% confidence interval 0.90Y0.99;
regulation and health care screening P=.01).52 A single serving of caffein-
should be similar to other forms of ated or decaffeinated coffee decreased
tobacco.50 However, insufficient evi- stroke risk by approximately 10%.53
dence exists for counseling patients to However, daily servings of soda appear
use e-cigarettes as a primary form of to increase the risk of ischemic stroke,
smoking cessation (Case 1-1C).50 with 13% increase per serving per day
of sugar-sweetened soda and 7% in-
Diet and Nutrition creased risk of ischemic stroke per daily
Diet and nutrition are important to serving of low-calorie soda.53 An addi-
address in stroke prevention counsel- tional meta-analysis indicates lower
ing. Not only have dietary patterns been stroke risk with two to four or more than
associated with risk factor manage- five servings of fish per week compared
ment, but recent studies have indicated to less than one serving per week.54
Case 1-1C
The patient in Case 1-1A was a former smoker who quit 12 years earlier.
Many of her coworkers were smokers, and she joined them on their smoke
breaks to be social. Her husband continued to smoke but was trying to
quit. He asked about the use of electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes).
Comment. The patient should be commended on smoking cessation and
encouraged to continue abstinence. However, the secondhand smoke she
was exposed to continued to increase her stroke risk. She should be
encouraged to avoid environmental exposure from coworkers, and her
husband should be encouraged to quit smoking or smoke outside the
house. Very little information is available on the long-term health effects of
e-cigarettes. While e-cigarettes may pose less potential stroke risk
compared to traditional cigarettes, insufficient evidence exists to counsel
her husband to use e-cigarettes as a primary form of smoking cessation,
and he should be encouraged to discuss forms of nicotine replacement
therapy, bupropion, or varenicline with his primary care provider.51
TABLE 1-2 Composition of the Healthy Mediterranean-Style and Healthy Vegetarian Eating
Patterns at the 2,000-Calorie Level, With Daily or Weekly Amounts From Food
Groups, Subgroups, and Componentsa
KEY POINTS
h Diet and nutrition can P=.005), but the difference in other sweetened beverages, and red meats.
affect not only risk end points was not significant.28 Lower These recommendations are consis-
factors such as risk of ischemic stroke with adherence tent with the DASH dietary pattern
hypertension and to the Mediterranean diet was confirmed and the AHA Diet.59
hyperlipidemia but also in the REGARDS cohort as well.56 Also of importance in lowering blood
stroke risk specifically. Additional findings show that extra- pressure is reduction of sodium intake.
The Dietary Approaches virgin olive oil in the context of the Lowering of blood pressure was seen
to Stop Hypertension Mediterranean diet may reduce atrial with sodium reduced to 2400 mg/d, with
diet is effective in fibrillation risk,57 and low adherence further improvement with a sodium in-
lowering blood pressure to the Mediterranean diet is associated take of only 1500 mg/d.60 A 1000 mg/d
and low-density
with increased large artery atheroscle- reduction of sodium intake reduces
lipoprotein, with
rotic stroke as well as worse clinical cardiovascular events by approximately
reduction of sodium
intake to 2400 mg/d or
presentation and outcome at dis- 30%, and higher sodium intake is asso-
less recommended for charge (as measured by the modified ciated with a greater risk of fatal and
those with hypertension. Rankin Score).58 nonfatal stroke and cardiovascular
In addition, diet is considered an disease. 59 High salt intake is also
h Obesity is an established
risk factor for ischemic
important strategy for risk factor independently associated with in-
stroke. With every management, in particular for choles- creased risk of stroke (relative risk 1.23,
1-unit increase in body terol and blood pressure lowering. The 95% confidence interval 1.06Y1.43;
mass index (about AHA/American College of Cardiology P=.007) (Case 1-1D).61
7 pounds), the risk for Guideline on Lifestyle Management to
ischemic stroke rises by Reduce Cardiovascular Risk was pub- Obesity
about 5%. lished in 2013. This evidence-based Being overweight or obese is highly
review showed that lowering saturated prevalent in the United States. Overall,
fat or total fat, or replacing saturated data from 2009 to 2012 showed that
fats or trans monounsaturated fats with 69% of US adults were overweight (body
monounsaturated or polyunsaturated mass index [BMI] higher than 25 kg/m2)
fats can successfully lower LDL-C.59 and 35% were obese (BMI of 30 kg/m2
The dietary pattern that is most effec- or higher).2 Obesity is an established
tive for lowering both LDL-C and blood risk factor for ischemic stroke, and epi-
pressure includes intake of vegetables, demiologic studies have shown that
fruits, whole grains, low-fat dairy prod- starting with a BMI of 20 kg/m2, for
ucts, poultry, fish, legumes, nontrop- every 1-unit increase in BMI (about
ical vegetable oils, and nuts while 7 pounds), the risk for ischemic stroke
limiting intake of sweets, sugar- rises by about 5%.62,63
Case 1-1D
The patient in Case 1-1A had been trying to lose weight over the past
5 years, following the Atkins diet. She asked about specific poststroke
dietary restrictions.
Comment. With hypertension, reduction of sodium intake is of
particular importance. To reduce blood pressure, sodium should be
reduced to 2400 mg/d, and the patient should be counseled that further
improvement in blood pressure has been seen with a sodium intake of
only 1500 mg/d. Although the Atkins diet has not been studied extensively
in stroke prevention, the Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension
(DASH) diet or Mediterranean diet (Table 1-2) should be encouraged
for risk factor reduction or stroke prevention, respectively.
hypertension, arterial function, and stroke survivors in both the acute and
insulin response.69 rehabilitation phases are outlined
Evidence-based recommendations in Table 1-3,70 including inpatient
for physical activity and exercise for and outpatient exercise therapy. The
Prescriptive Guidelines:
Setting/Mode of Exercise Goals/Objectives Frequency/Intensity/Time
Hospitalization and early
convalescence (acute phase)
Low-level walking, self-care Prevent deconditioning, hypostatic Approximately 10Y20 beats/min
activities pneumonia, orthostatic increases in resting heart rate (HR);
intolerance, and depression; rate of perceived exertion (RPE)
Intermittent sitting or standing
evaluate cognitive and motor e11 (6Y20 scale); frequency and
Seated activities deficits; stimulate balance duration as tolerated, using an
and coordination interval or work-rest approach
Range-of-motion activities,
motor challenges
Inpatient and outpatient exercise
therapy or rehabilitation
Aerobic Increase walking speed and 40Y70% oxygen uptake (VO2)
efficiency; improve exercise reserve or HR reserve; 55Y80% HR
Large-muscle activities
tolerance (functional capacity); maximum; RPE 11Y14 (6Y20 scale)
(eg, walking, graded
increase independence in
walking, stationary cycle 3Y5 days per week; 20- to
activities of daily living (ADLs);
ergometry, arm ergometry, 60-minute session (or multiple
reduce motor impairment
arm-leg ergometry, functional 10-minute sessions); 5Y10 minutes
and improve cognition; improve
activities with seated of warm-up and cool-down
vascular health and induce
exercises, if appropriate) activities; complement with
other cardioprotective benefits
pedometers to increase lifestyle
(eg, vasomotor reactivity,
physical activity
decrease cardiovascular risk)
Muscular strength/endurance Increase muscle strength and 1Y3 sets of 10Y15 repetitions of
endurance; increase ability to 8Y10 exercises involving the major
Resistance training of upper perform leisure time and muscle groups at 50Y80% of
and lower extremities, occupational activities and 1 repetition maximum; 2Y3 days
trunk using free weights, ADLs; reduce cardiac demands per week; resistance gradually
weight-bearing or partial (ie, rate-pressure product) increased over time as
weight-bearing activities, during lifting or carrying objects tolerance permits
elastic bands, spring by increasing muscular strength,
coils, pulleys thereby decreasing the percentage
Circuit training of maximal voluntary contractions
that a given load now represents
Functional mobility
Continued on page 31
Prescriptive Guidelines:
Setting/Mode of Exercise Goals/Objectives Frequency/Intensity/Time
Neuromuscular Improve balance, skill reacquisition, Use as a complement to aerobic,
quality of life, and mobility; muscular strength/endurance
Balance and coordination decrease fear of falling; improve training, and stretching activities;
activities
level of safety during ADLs 2Y3 days per week
Tai chi
Yoga
Recreational activities
using paddles/sport balls
to challenge hand-eye
coordination
Active-play video gaming
and interactive
computer games
a
Modified from Gordon NF, et al, Circulation.70 B 2004 American Heart Association, Inc. circ.ahajournals.org/content/109/16/2031.long.
b
Reprinted with permission from Billinger SA, et al, Stroke.69 B 2014 American Heart Association, Inc. stroke.ahajournals.org/content/
45/8/2532.long.
recommendations include aerobic, intensity aerobic exercise per week, KEY POINT
muscular strength/endurance, flexibil- with sessions lasting an average of h Patients with stroke
should engage in three
ity, and neuromuscular activities, as 40 minutes. The guideline also recom-
to four sessions of
well as the frequency, intensity, and mends referral to a comprehensive,
moderate- to
duration of activities that can provide behaviorally oriented program for those vigorous-intensity
multiple benefits for stroke survivors willing and able to initiate physical activ- aerobic exercise per
(Case 1-1E).69 The AHA/ASA second- ity, and, for those with disabilities, week, with sessions
ary prevention guideline recommends supervision by a health care professional lasting an average of
that patients engage in three to four such as a physical therapist or cardiac 40 minutes.
sessions of moderate- to vigorous- rehabilitation expert is reasonable.8
Case 1-1E
On neurologic examination, the patient in Case 1-1A had left facial
asymmetry and 5-/5 strength throughout her left hemibody. Her gait was
slow, but not spastic. She had completed a course of physical therapy
and continued to use a cane for long distances. She asked about activity
restrictions or recommendations.
Comment. This stroke survivor has minimal weakness but some
limitations in mobility after reaching her physical therapy goals. She should
be encouraged to pursue safe mobility by increasing her walking in the
community, starting with 10 minutes at a time and increasing to 20 to
60 minutes at a time, 3 to 5 days per week. This aerobic exercise could also
include stationary cycle ergometry, arm ergometry, arm-leg ergometry, or
functional activities with seated exercises (Table 1-3). Other recommended
neuromuscular exercises include tai chi, yoga, or recreational activities using
paddles/sport balls to challenge hand-eye coordination.69
KEY POINT
h In patients without a and various recognized risk Multiple trials have evaluated the
cardioembolic source, factors should have lipoprotein combination of dipyridamole and aspi-
aspirin monotherapy at (a) levels checked and rin in secondary stroke prevention. The
doses of 50 mg to repeatedly monitored if on European Stroke Prevention Study 2
325 mg is an appropriate drug treatment (ESPS-2) compared the combination of
strategy for secondary & Patients with familial hyper- dipyridamole 200 mg and aspirin 25 mg
stroke prevention. cholesterolemia, genetic 2 times a day to placebo, with a 37% risk
dyslipidemia or low HDL-C, or reduction of subsequent stroke and a
genetic defects of hemostasis or 23% risk reduction when compared
homocysteine metabolism should to aspirin 25 mg 2 times a day.89 While
be tested for lipoprotein (a) bleeding is not significantly increased
& Patients without evident with this combination, headache and
cardiovascular disease but gastrointestinal symptoms have limited
elevated cardiovascular disease its use significantly. However, AHA/ASA
risk, such as a greater than guidelines recommend consideration
10% 10-year risk of fatal or of aspirin alone or combination aspi-
nonfatal coronary heart disease rin and dipyridamole for secondary
as per the risk calculator stroke prevention.8
should also be tested Clopidogrel has been compared to
for lipoprotein (a) aspirin alone in the Clopidogrel Versus
Aspirin in Patients at Risk of Ischaemic
ANTIPLATELET THERAPY Events (CAPRIE) trial, which enrolled
In patients without a cardioembolic over 19,000 patients with stroke, myo-
source, antiplatelet therapy is a main- cardial infarction, or peripheral vascular
stay of stroke prevention, consistently disease.90 The combined outcome of
reducing risk of recurrent stroke across ischemic stroke, myocardial infarction,
studies. The cheapest and most widely and vascular death was significantly lower
available option is aspirin, which has with clopidogrel (5.32% versus 5.83%,
been studied for stroke prevention in relative risk reduction 8.7%, 95% confi-
doses ranging from 50 mg to 1500 mg. dence interval 0.3%Y16.5%, P=.043),
Across placebo-controlled trials of aspi- although the study was not designed
rin for secondary stroke prevention, re- to determine effectiveness in secondary
duction of stroke was approximately stroke prevention. Subgroup analysis of
15% (relative risk, 95% confidence inter- patients entering the trial because of
val 6%Y23%).87 Meta-analysis of head- stroke did not show a significant differ-
to-head trials of aspirin dose found no ence in vascular outcomes. Clopidogrel
significant difference in stroke prevention is a reasonable alternative to aspirin
between low-dose aspirin (lower than or combination aspirin/dipyridamole,
75 mg) and higher doses (75 mg or eg, in patients who are allergic to
higher).88 However, pooled results from aspirin or have other indications for
studies without direct comparison of clopidogrel use.8
doses show a smaller effect with a The combination of aspirin and clo-
dose lower than 75 mg/d. Aspirin mono- pidogrel has been compared to clo-
therapy at doses of 50 mg/d to 325 mg/d pidogrel alone in patients with TIA or
is an appropriate strategy for secondary ischemic stroke in the Management of
stroke prevention and is recommended Atherothrombosis With Clopidogrel
by the AHA/ASA guidelines for the in High-Risk Patients With Recent Tran-
Prevention of Stroke in Patients with sient Ischaemic Attack or Ischaemic
Stroke and TIA.8 Stroke (MATCH) trial,91 and to aspirin
34 ContinuumJournal.com February 2017
10. Sealy-Jefferson S, Wing JJ, Sánchez B, et al. and injuries in 188 countries, 1990-2013: a
Age- and ethnic-specific sex differences in systematic analysis for the Global Burden of
stroke risk. Gend Med 2012;9(2):121Y128. Disease Study 2013. Lancet 2015;386(9995):
doi:10.1016/j.genm.2012.02.002. 743Y800. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(15)60692-4.
11. Seshadri S, Beiser A, Kelly-Hayes M, et al. 21. Howard G, Cushman M, Kissela BM, et al.
The lifetime risk of stroke: estimates from Traditional risk factors as the underlying
the Framingham Study. Stroke 2006; cause of racial disparities in stroke: lessons
37(2):345Y350. doi:10.1161/ from the half-full (empty?) glass. Stroke
01.STR.0000199613.38911.b2. 2011;42(12):3369Y3375. doi:10.1161/
12. Reeves MJ, Bushnell CD, Howard G, et al. STROKEAHA.111.625277.
Sex differences in stroke: epidemiology, 22. James PA, Oparil S, Carter BL, et al. 2014
clinical presentation, medical care, and evidence-based guideline for the
outcomes. Lancet Neurol 2008;7(10):915Y926. management of high blood pressure in adults:
doi:10.1016/S1474-4422(08)70193-5. report from the panel members appointed
13. Howard VJ, Kleindorfer DO, Judd SE, et al. to the Eighth Joint National Committee
Disparities in stroke incidence contributing (JNC 8). JAMA 2014;311(5):507Y520.
to disparities in stroke mortality. doi:10.1001/jama.2013.284427.
Ann Neurol 2011;69(4):619Y627. 23. Go AS, Bauman MA, Coleman King SM, et al.
doi:10.1002/ana.22385. An effective approach to high blood pressure
14. Kleindorfer DO, Khoury J, Moomaw CJ, et al. control: a science advisory from the
Stroke incidence is decreasing in whites but American Heart Association, the American
not in blacks: a population-based estimate College of Cardiology, and the Centers
of temporal trends in stroke incidence from for Disease Control and Prevention. J Am
the Greater Cincinnati/Northern Kentucky Coll Cardiol 2014;63(12):1230Y1238.
Stroke Study. Stroke J Cereb Circ 2010; doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2013.11.007.
41(7):1326Y1331. doi:10.1161/
24. SPRINT Research Group, Wright JT Jr,
STROKEAHA.109.575043.
Williamson JD, et al. A randomized trial of
15. Morgenstern LB, Smith MA, Lisabeth LD, intensive versus standard blood-pressure
et al. Excess stroke in Mexican Americans control. N Engl J Med 2015;373(22):
compared with non-Hispanic Whites: the 2103Y2116. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1511939.
Brain Attack Surveillance in Corpus Christi
25. Rothwell PM, Howard SC, Dolan E, et al.
Project. Am J Epidemiol 2004;160(4):
Prognostic significance of visit-to-visit
376Y383. doi:10.1093/aje/kwh225.
variability, maximum systolic blood pressure,
16. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. and episodic hypertension. Lancet
Stroke death rates, total population 35+. 2010;375(9718):895Y905. doi:10.1016/
cdc.gov/dhdsp/maps/national_maps/ S0140-6736(10)60308-X.
stroke_all.htm. Updated June 24, 2015.
26. Rothwell PM, Howard SC, Dolan E, et al.
Accessed November 29, 2016.
Effects of beta blockers and calcium-channel
17. Howard G, Anderson R, Johnson NJ, et al. blockers on within-individual variability in
Evaluation of social status as a contributing blood pressure and risk of stroke. Lancet
factor to the stroke belt region of the Neurol 2010;9(5):469Y480. doi:10.1016/
United States. Stroke 1997;28(5):936Y940. S1474-4422(10)70066-1.
doi:10.1161/01.STR.28.5.936.
27. Appel LJ, Moore TJ, Obarzanek E, et al. A
18. Gillum RF, Kwagyan J, Obisesan TO. Ethnic clinical trial of the effects of dietary patterns
and geographic variation in stroke mortality on blood pressure. DASH Collaborative Research
trends. Stroke 2011;42(11):3294Y3296. Group. N Engl J Med 1997;336(17):1117Y1124.
doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.111.625343. 28. Estruch R, Ros E, Salas-Salvadó J, et al. Primary
prevention of cardiovascular disease with a
19. Krishnamurthi RV, Feigin VL, Forouzanfar
Mediterranean diet. N Engl J Med 2013;368(14):
MH, et al. Global and regional burden of
1279Y1290. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1200303.
first-ever ischaemic and haemorrhagic
stroke during 1990-2010: findings from the 29. Stone NJ, Robinson JG, Lichtenstein AH,
Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. Lancet et al. 2013 ACC/AHA guideline on the
Glob Health 2013;1(5):e259Ye281. treatment of blood cholesterol to reduce
doi:10.1016/S2214-109X(13)70089-5. atherosclerotic cardiovascular risk in adults:
a report of the American College of
20. Global Burden of Disease Study 2013 Cardiology/American Heart Association
Collaborators. Global, regional, and national Task Force on Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll
incidence, prevalence, and years lived with Cardiol 2014;63(25 pt B):2889Y2934.
disability for 301 acute and chronic diseases doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2013.11.002.
40. Nakamura K, Barzi F, Lam TH, et al. 50. Bhatnagar A, Whitsel LP, Ribisl KM, et al.
Cigarette smoking, systolic blood pressure, Electronic cigarettes: a policy statement
and cardiovascular diseases in the Asia-Pacific from the American Heart Association.
region. Stroke 2008;39(6):1694Y1702. Circulation 2014;130(16):1418Y1436.
doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.107.496752. doi:10.1161/CIR.0000000000000107.
Clinical Evaluation
Address correspondence to
Dr Andrew M. Southerland,
University of Virginia,
Department of Neurology,
Box 800394, McKim Hall,
Room 2113, Charlottesville,
VA 22908, [email protected].
of the Patient With
Relationship Disclosure:
Dr. Southerland serves as
deputy editor of the
Acute Stroke
Neurology podcast and
receives research/grant Andrew M. Southerland, MD, MSc
support from the American
Academy of Neurology,
American Board of Psychiatry
and Neurology, Health
ABSTRACT
Resources & Services Purpose of Review: This article reviews the clinical evaluation of the patient with
Administration (HRSA acute stroke, including key questions in the focused stroke history, important aspects
GO1RH27869-01-00), and
the National Institute of of the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale and focused neurologic examination,
Neurological Disorders and and the significance of the basic head CT scan in informing a timely treatment decision.
Stroke (U01 NS069498). Recent Findings: Advances in both stroke treatment and enhanced diagnostics
Unlabeled Use of
Products/Investigational
support an evolving paradigm for acute stroke care, ranging from the prehospital set-
Use Disclosure: ting to the rehabilitative setting. An international emphasis on best practice strategies
Dr Southerland reports promotes efficiency and standardization in stroke systems of care.
no disclosure.
Summary: Despite continual changes and augmentations to the field of acute stroke,
* 2017 American Academy
of Neurology. several fundamentals remain. Central among these is in-depth knowledge of neuro-
vascular anatomy, clinical stroke syndromes, and common mimics, which are
foundational to the bedside evaluation of the patient with acute stroke.
Continued on page 42
KEY POINT
h Establishing time TABLE 2-1 American Heart Association/American aStroke Association
of stroke onset, or Target: Stroke Best Practice Strategies Continued from page 41
last known well time,
starts the clock on b Team-Based Approach
all further decision
The team-based approach based on standardized stroke pathways and
making for the patient
protocols has proven to be effective in enhancing the number of eligible
with acute stroke.
patients treated and reducing time to treatment in stroke.
Confirming last known
well time with the b Prompt Data Feedback
patient or a reliable Accurately measuring and tracking the hospital’s door-to-needle times, IV
witness, or identifying rtPA treatment rates in eligible patients, other time intervals, and performance
an associated event, is on other stroke performance/quality measures equip the stroke team to
key to informing accurate identify areas for improvement and take appropriate action.
treatment decisions CT = computed tomography; IV = intravenous; MRI = magnetic resonance imaging.
a
going forward. Data from Fonarow GC, et al, Stroke,4 stroke.ahajournals.org/content/42/10/2983.long;
Fonarow GC, et al, JAMA,5 jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/1861802; and Xian Y,
et al, Stroke.6 stroke.ahajournals.org/content/45/5/1387.long.
KEY POINTS
h Patients in atrial lowering blood pressure in accordance strokes score approximately 4 points
fibrillation with focal with current treatment guidelines (eg, higher than nondominant (right)
neurologic deficits asking the pharmacist or nurse to hemispheric strokes, reflecting the
should be assumed to prepare IV labetalol or a nicardipine impact of aphasia on the neurologic
have cardioembolic drip to be immediately ready follow- assessment.14 Similarly, for a given
ischemic stroke until ing head CT).10 NIHSS score, the volume of infarction
proven otherwise. In addition to assessing blood pres- is greater for nondominant, right
Inquiring about sure, identifying the cardiac rhythm via hemisphere than dominant left hemi-
anticoagulation and ECG or telemetry informs the acute sphere strokes.15 Additionally, the
medication compliance stroke presentation. Patients present- NIHSS may underestimate posterior
in the acute stroke
ing in atrial fibrillation with focal neuro- circulation stroke deficits compared to
history is essential to
logic deficits should be assumed to be anterior circulation stroke deficits.16
informing an appropriate
treatment decision.
having a cardioembolic stroke until Patients presenting with small brain-
proven otherwise. stem or cerebellar strokes may have a
h The National Institutes low or even 0 NIHSS score, and care-
of Health Stroke Scale The National Institutes of ful vigilance should be employed to
is biased toward left
Health Stroke Scale determine eligibility for acute treatment
hemispheric and
anterior circulation The most important caveat regarding in this population.17
strokes. Therefore, the National Institutes of Health Stroke
careful vigilance should Scale (NIHSS) is to recognize that it is LABORATORY DATA
be employed when not an adequate substitute for a com- In the process of transitioning the
assessing stroke severity prehensive neurologic examination. patient with acute stroke from a
in patients with The NIHSS is, however, a highly reliable focused neurologic examination to an
nondominant, right and valid screening assessment for the initial head CT, the traditional ap-
hemisphere, brainstem, rapid evaluation of a patient with acute proach is to obtain a quick blood draw
or isolated cerebellar stroke.11 The 11-item scale measures for laboratory testing. Importantly,
strokes to guide
consciousness, orientation, visual fields, eligibility criteria for IV rtPA require
treatment.
gaze, language fluency and comprehen- platelet count greater than 100,000/6L,
sion, speech, sensory loss and neglect, prothrombin time less than 15 sec-
motor strength, and limb ataxia. Vali- onds, and partial thromboplastin time
dated for use by neurologists and non- within normal limits. However, the
neurologist providers and nurses, the 2013 AHA/ASA guideline on the early
scale can easily be completed in less management of patients with acute
than 10 minutes and serves as an initial ischemic stroke suggests that only a
measure of stroke severity ranging from finger-stick blood glucose is absolutely
0 (no deficits) to 42 (maximum score). required before initiation of IV rtPA.10
The NIHSS has no minimum score that A prominent exception to this allow-
would exclude eligibility to receive IV ance applies for patients on warfarin
rtPA, and patients with mild but none- or with known hematologic abnormal-
theless disabling symptoms should be ities, for whom pretreatment coagula-
offered therapy.12 Additionally, eligibil- tion profile and complete blood cell
ity for endovascular therapy has re- count is necessary. Other laboratory
cently been established for appropriate tests, such as electrolytes, renal func-
patients with an NIHSS score of 6 or tion, and troponins, are suggested in
higher and the presence of a large the acute stroke evaluation but should
vessel occlusion.13 not delay the transition to head CT or
Of additional note, one should be treatment with IV rtPA. Additionally, ob-
aware of biases within the NIHSS. For taining vascular access for blood draws
instance, dominant (left) hemispheric may delay the transition to head CT;
44 ContinuumJournal.com February 2017
Case 2-1
An independent 73-year-old right-handed man developed the sudden
onset of confusion, slurred speech, and left-sided weakness. His wife called
911, and initial emergency medical services (EMS) assessment revealed
abnormal speech, facial weakness, and left arm drift. He was immediately
transported to the nearest primary stroke center, and the EMS crew
notified the hospital of the last known well time and the estimated time
of arrival. During transport, a point-of-care blood glucose was mildly
elevated, IV access was obtained, and rapid ECG was consistent with
atrial fibrillation (the patient was not on anticoagulation). A prehospital
stroke alert was executed, and upon arrival to the emergency department,
the patient was met by the acute stroke team and triaged directly to
the CT scanner.
His initial blood pressure was 160/80 mm Hg, his heart rate was
90 beats/min (irregularly irregular), and his National Institutes of Health
Stroke Scale score was 13, for disorientation, partial right gaze preference,
left hemianopia, left lower facial weakness, dysarthria, left arm weakness,
left leg drift, sensory loss, and extinction. Noncontrast head CT revealed
a dense artery sign in the distal right M1 trunk and early ischemic changes
in the right insular region. Continued on page 47
paradigm, stroke is indeed a clinical di- cerebral artery (MCA). Anterior circula-
agnosis, with cerebral infarction repre- tion ischemia accounts for the majority
senting the tissue diagnosis and stroke of all strokes.
subtype informing the mechanism. Internal carotid artery. As the in-
These traditional delineations have ternal carotid artery (ICA) enters the
been reevaluated in the age of ad- cerebral circulation, it branches into
vanced imaging, where stroke can the ACA and MCA. Occlusion of the
be diagnosed by the presence of infarc- ICA most often occurs secondary to
tion on brain MRI (ie, restricted dif- atherosclerotic plaque and critical
fusion) even in the absence of a stenosis at the level of the cervical
persistent stroke syndrome. However, bifurcation or as a thromboembolic
according to a 2013 AHA/ASA state- occlusion of the distal carotid, the so-
ment, the definition of ischemic called carotid T lesion. In the scenario
stroke still invokes ‘‘focal cerebral, spi- of a carotid T lesion, the majority of
nal, or retinal infarction’’ in a ‘‘defined the ipsilateral hemisphere becomes
vascular distribution.’’23 ischemic and will result in ACA/MCA
Therefore, the ability to localize a territory infarction with contralateral
defined vascular distribution in the hemiplegia unless rapid reperfusion
patient with acute stroke remains the can be established.
first tool in the black bag of the neu- Symptomatic ICA stenosis at the
rologist and fundamentally requires cervical bifurcation often manifests as
in-depth understanding of neuroana- minor stroke or transient ischemic at-
tomic stroke syndromes, as discussed tack secondary to artery-to-artery em-
here. Common large vessel stroke syn- bolism into the ipsilateral carotid
dromes are listed in Table 2-3.24 territory. In addition to hemispheric
signs and symptoms, carotid stenosis
Anterior Circulation Syndromes may be heralded by transient central
The anterior circulation encompasses retinal artery occlusion resulting in
the distribution of the internal carotid ipsilateral amaurosis fugax, or transient
artery and its major branches, the an- monocular blindness (the so-called
terior cerebral artery (ACA) and middle ‘‘shade coming down over the eye’’),
a,b
TABLE 2-3 Large Vessel Stroke Syndromes (Laterality Assumes Left Hemispheric Dominance)
KEY POINT
h Mild hemispatial a
TABLE 2-4 The Aphasias
neglect from a right
middle cerebral artery Type of Aphasia Fluency Comprehension Repetition
stroke can be
Motor/expressive (Broca) Impaired Normal Impaired
elicited at the bedside
by double simultaneous Sensory/receptive (Wernicke) Normal Impaired Impaired
stimulation, during Conduction Normal Normal Impaired
which the patient
extinguishes the Transcortical motor Impaired Normal Normal
contralateral Transcortical sensory Normal Impaired Normal
sensory stimulus.
Mixed Variable Variable Variable
Global Impaired Impaired Impaired
a 24
Data from Eckerle BJ, Southerland AM, Wiley-Blackwell.
FIGURE 2-1 The graphic aphasia box. Plus symbols indicate intact components of language;
minus symbols indicate impaired components of language.
24
Reprinted with permission from Eckerle BJ, Southerland AM, Wiley-Blackwell. B 2013 John Wiley &
Sons, Ltd.
Case 2-2
A 77-year-old right-handed woman was at breakfast when she suddenly
became confused and fell to the ground with convulsive seizure activity
lasting several minutes. Witnesses reported her eyes and head deviated to
the left during the episode. In the emergency department, her National
Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score was 15, and her examination was
notable for mild somnolence, a right gaze preference, decreased blink to
threat on the left, and left hemiplegia of the arm and leg. When her arm
was presented in her right visual field, she did not recognize it as her own.
Head CT demonstrated no acute hemorrhage, with subtle early ischemic
change in the right insula and a dense artery M1 sign on the right (Figure 2-2).
Continued on page 52
ACA strokes may also result in abulia tion, equating to approximately 70,000
or apathy (lack of will) from ischemia to 100,000 presentations in the United
to the anterior cingulate gyrus or cau- States each year.27,28 Distinguishing
date head (recurrent artery of Heubner). between anterior and posterior circu-
In addition to ischemic ACA stroke, lation syndromes is essential to defin-
this syndrome may also manifest from ing the likely source and mechanism
a ruptured aneurysm of the ACA or of acute stroke and to guide second-
anterior communicating artery, and, in ary stroke prevention. Moreover, while
the extreme form, may result in latent compromise of the anterior circula-
akinetic mutism. A common anatomic tion can produce larger hemispheric
variant, in which the right and left ACAs strokes, strokes involving the posterior
stem from a common A1 trunk, can circulation can be equally devastating
result in infarction to bilateral ACA when involving vital structures in the
territories and present as bilateral leg brainstem and cerebellum (Table 2-5).
weakness. As noted, infarction of the Brainstem syndromes. Stroke syn-
ACA territory most often results from dromes in the brainstem can be tri-
carotid occlusion and in conjunction chotomized into the three anatomic
with infarction of the MCA territory. levels: midbrain, pons, and medulla. The
midbrain receives circulation from the
Posterior Circulation Syndromes top of the basilar artery and the poste-
According to AHA/ASA stroke statistics, rior cerebral artery (PCA) and is often
approximately 20% of incident strokes infarcted via intrinsic perforator (small
per year involve the posterior circula- vessel) occlusion, intrinsic disease in
KEY POINTS
h Bilateral medial nuclei (third nerve palsy) or the medial Classically, lateral medullary stroke pre-
thalamic strokes result longitudinal fasciculus (internuclear sents with components of dysphagia
in a state of depressed ophthalmoplegia), the corticospinal and dysphonia (nucleus ambiguus,
level of consciousness tracts in the cerebral peduncles (con- vagal and glossopharyngeal nerves),
or coma and often tralateral hemiparesis), cerebellar tracts vertigo and disequilibrium (vestibular
occur secondary to in the superior cerebellar peduncles nuclei), ipsilateral oculosympathetic
occlusion of a single (ipsilateral ataxia), or rubral tracts via Horner syndrome (ptosis/miosis, de-
thalamoperforator trunk the red nuclei (ipsilateral tremor). scending sympathetic tracts), ipsilat-
off the top of the basilar Similarly, pontine strokes are often eral face and contralateral body crossed
artery, known as the the result of small vessel perforator oc- sensory loss of pain and temperature
artery of Percheron.
clusion or intrinsic large artery disease sensation (trigeminal and spinotha-
h When examining or thrombus in the midbasilar artery. lamic tracts), and ipsilateral limb ataxia
patients with stroke Pontine syndromes often include dys- (spinocerebellar tract).
who are tetraplegic or arthria, contralateral hemiparesis via Alternatively, a medial medullary syn-
appear to be comatose,
injury to descending corticospinal tracts drome involves ventral structures in the
the examiner must
in the ventral pons, hemianesthesia via lower brainstem with ipsilateral tongue
always ensure they are
not actually ‘‘locked in’’
ascending sensory tracts, ataxic hemipa- weakness (hypoglossal nucleus) and
from bilateral pontine resis via crossing cortico-pontocerebellar contralateral hemiparesis (pyramidal
infarction and able to tracts, or horizontal gaze palsies via tracts rostral to the decussation). Medial
communicate with involvement of cranial nerve VI nucleus medullary strokes often occur from
vertical eye movements and the paramedian pontine reticu- branch occlusion of the anterior spinal
or other subtle signs. lar formation, the so-called lateral artery, with or without parent vertebral
h Alexia without gaze center. artery disease.
agraphia classically Possibly the most devastating stroke Posterior cerebral artery. Stroke
results from a left syndrome, locked-in syndrome, mani- involving the PCA territories is often
posterior cerebral artery fests from bilateral infarction in the ven- the downstream result of thrombo-
territory stroke causing tral pons, disconnecting the midbrain embolism to the posterior circulation
infarction of the and supratentorial structures from the or intrinsic atherosclerotic disease in
splenium of the corpus rest of the lower nervous system, re- the PCA. The typical circulation of
callosum and left sulting in complete tetraplegia with a the PCA supplies the midbrain, thala-
occipital lobe, leading
preserved level of consciousness. Im- mus, and occipital and dorsomedial
to a disconnection
portantly, with an intact midbrain, temporal lobe. The hallmark local-
of visual and
language integration.
patients with locked-in syndrome can izing sign of a PCA territory stroke is a
still communicate via blinking or ver- contralateral homonymous hemianopia
tical eye movements. Therefore, when secondary to occipital lobe infarction,
examining patients with acute stroke absent of hemiparesis or other hemi-
who are apparently comatose, the ex- spheric signs that would localize to
aminer must always ensure they are the MCA territory. Hemianopias ema-
not actually awake and able to com- nating from PCA stroke are said to be
municate with eye movements or other macular sparing, secondary to redun-
subtle signs (Case 2-3). dancy of macular representation in
Medullary stroke syndromes. The the occipital lobe. Another textbook
medullary stroke syndromes are di- syndrome involving the PCA territory is
vided by the medial and lateral me- alexia without agraphia, which clas-
dulla. The lateral medullary syndrome sically manifests from infarction to
(Wallenberg syndrome) results from the splenium of the corpus callosum
infarction in the posterior inferior cere- and left occipital lobe, resulting in a
bellar artery (PICA) territory, often from disconnection of visual and lan-
occlusion of the parent vertebral artery. guage integration.
54 ContinuumJournal.com February 2017
KEY POINTS
h Patients presenting Cerebellar arteries. Of the arteries challenging clinical scenario, even for
with acute-onset supplying the cerebellum, the largest the most seasoned neurologist or
dysequilibrium or gait distribution stems from the PICA. PICA stroke specialist, and can be difficult
ataxia should prompt a territory strokes often involve the lat- to discern from peripheral vestibular
thorough examination eral medulla, as described previously, disorders in the absence of other
of eye movements, or the ipsilateral cerebellar hemisphere. localizing signs, eg, focal limb ataxia
postural stability, Cerebellar hemispheric strokes present or neighborhood signs, such as dysar-
and gait to rule out with ipsilateral limb dysmetria (past- thria, diplopia, dysphagia, or dysphonia.
a paramedian pointing), dyssynergia (incoordination) In these presentations, neuro-
cerebellar stroke. or intention tremor (widened ampli- otologic bedside maneuvers can help
h The HINTS methodology tude at target), impaired check response distinguish central from peripheral
(head impulse test, (rebound with sudden limb decelera- causes of vertigo. One set of methods
pattern of nystagmus, tion), and dysdiadochokinesia (im- is termed HINTS, an acronym for head
and test of skew) paired rapid-alternating movements). impulse test, pattern of nystagmus, and
helps distinguish
Note, cerebellar stroke syndromes in- test for skew. If the head impulse test
central from peripheral
volving the paramedian or flocculono- is normal, the fast phase of nystagmus
vestibulopathy in
patients presenting
dular lobes may be less discrete, apparent changes direction, or a skew devia-
with an acute only as midline signs of titubation (pos- tion is present, it suggests a central
vestibular syndrome. tural instability with sitting upright) or process such as posterior circulation
gait ataxia with ambulating. In this stroke with greater than 90% sensitiv-
scenario, a patient with acute stroke ity.30 In a 2015 study of patients pres-
may actually have an NIHSS score of 0, enting with acute vertigo and either
a reminder that the NIHSS is not a re- nystagmus or imbalance, this testing
placement for a thorough neurologic helped risk stratify patients who went
examination. Patients will often report on to have a confirmed stroke.31 Addi-
listing to the ipsilateral side. tionally, these bedside tests may actu-
While less common than PICA terri- ally have greater sensitivity than brain
tory stroke, occlusion of the anterior MRI for diagnosing small brainstem and
inferior cerebellar artery (AICA) results cerebellar strokes in the hyperacute
in a characteristic syndrome of sudden setting32 and therefore are valuable
vertigo and ipsilateral sensorineural clinical tools to help guide inpatient
hearing loss. This occurs due to ische- versus outpatient management of pa-
mia of the vestibulocochlear nerve and tients presenting with acute dizziness.
inner ear supplied by the labyrinthine Still, these bedside otologic maneuvers
artery. AICA strokes can also include may not capture all central processes
ipsilateral upper and lower facial weak- or causes of stroke in vestibular syn-
ness (cranial nerve VII) due to involve- dromes and should be considered
ment of the pontomedullary junction. supplemental to a dedicated history
The superior cerebellar artery supplies and thorough neurologic examination.
a smaller segment of the rostral cere- Table 2-6 lists red flags that should
bellar hemisphere, and occlusion, from heighten concern for stroke in the dif-
intrinsic arterial disease or thrombo- ferential diagnosis for patients pres-
embolus, also presents with ipsilateral enting with acute vestibular syndrome.
cerebellar signs.
Acute vestibular syndrome. Between Lacunar (Small Vessel) Syndromes
2 million and 4 million emergency de- Distinguishing between large and
partment visits each year are related to small vessel syndromes in acute stroke
dizziness.28,29 Dizziness or vertigo as a has taken on heightened relevance
presenting symptom of stroke is a with the recent evidence in favor of
56 ContinuumJournal.com February 2017
endovascular therapy for patients with able to the anterior spinal artery can
large vessel occlusion. Small vessel (ie, be isolated to penetrating branch
lacunar syndromes) indicate occlusion occlusions (eg, medial medullary syn-
of perforating arteries in the subcortex, drome) or more completely involve
brainstem, or cerebellum, often associ- the anterior two-thirds of the spinal
ated with chronic hypertension and cord (anterior spinal syndrome), spar-
diabetes mellitus (Table 2-7). Lacunar ing only the sensory tracts of the
infarcts may be clinically silent, as seen dorsal columns.
on head CT, or result in stroke syn- Ischemic vulnerability in the spinal
dromes involving densely packed cord is greatest in the midthoracic sec-
white matter tracts with specific local- tions, where a watershed exists be-
ization patterns. The most commonly tween the anterior spinal artery and
described small vessel syndromes in- more robust radicular arteries supply-
clude pure motor, pure sensory, sen- ing the lumbosacral enlargement (eg,
sorimotor, ataxic hemiparesis, and the the artery of Adamkiewicz). In this sce-
so-called dysarthria-clumsy hand syn- nario, a patient often presents with
drome. The various subcortical locali- sudden neck or back pain, followed by
zations of these syndromes include the paraplegia and a spinal sensory loss of
internal capsule, thalamus, basal ganglia, pain and temperature below the level
pons, cerebellum, and subcortical white of infarction. Spinal shock initially
matter (corona radiata). A less com- appears as flaccidity and hyporeflexia,
mon, but striking, small vessel syn- followed within days by upper motor
drome manifests as hemiballism from neuron signs of spastic paraplegia
infarction in the subthalamic nucleus. and hyperreflexia. In addition to ath-
erosclerosis and aortic dissection as
Spinal Vascular Syndromes common etiologies, anterior cord syn-
Like the brain, the spinal cord has a dromes can also result iatrogenically
robust collateral blood supply. The during aortic surgery.
anterior and posterior spinal arteries
supply the ventral and dorsal cord, STROKE MIMICS
respectively, as branches of the extra- In the clinical evaluation of the patient
dural vertebral artery. Strokes refer- with acute stroke, the ability to rule
a
TABLE 2-7 Lacunar Syndromes
2. Ford AL, Williams JA, Spencer M, et al. 12. Demaerschalk BM, Kleindorfer DO,
Reducing door-to-needle times using Adeoye OM, et al. Scientific rationale
Toyota’s lean manufacturing principles for the inclusion and exclusion criteria for
and value stream analysis. Stroke intravenous alteplase in acute ischemic
2012;43(12):3395Y3398. doi:10.1161/ stroke: a statement for healthcare
STROKEAHA.112.670687. professionals from the American Heart
Association/American Stroke Association.
3. Lewis WR, Fonarow GC, LaBresh KA, et al.
Stroke 2016;47(2):581Y641. doi:10.1161/
Differential use of warfarin for secondary
STR.0000000000000086.
stroke prevention in patients with various
types of atrial fibrillation. Am J Cardiol 13. Powers WJ, Derdeyn CP, Biller J, et al.
2009;103(2):227Y231. doi:10.1016/ 2015 American Heart Association/American
j.amjcard.2008.08.062. Stroke Association Focused Update of the
2013 Guidelines for the Early Management
4. Fonarow GC, Smith EE, Saver JL, et al.
of Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke
Improving door-to-needle times in acute
Regarding Endovascular Treatment: A
ischemic stroke: the design and rationale for
Guideline for Healthcare Professionals From
the American Heart Association/American
the American Heart Association/American
Stroke Association’s Target: stroke initiative.
Stroke Association. Stroke
Stroke 2011;42(10):2983Y2989. doi:10.1161/
2015;46(10):3020Y3035. doi:10.1161/
STROKEAHA.111.621342.
STR.0000000000000074.
5. Fonarow GC, Zhao X, Smith EE, et al.
14. Lyden P, Claesson L, Havstad S,
Door-to-needle times for tissue plasminogen
et al. Factor analysis of the National
activator administration and clinical
Institutes of Health Stroke Scale in
outcomes in acute ischemic stroke before
patients with large strokes. Arch Neurol
and after a quality improvement initiative.
2004;61(11):1677Y1680. doi:10.1001/
JAMA 2014;311(16):1632Y1640.
archneur.61.11.1677.
doi:10.1001/jama.2014.3203.
15. Woo D, Broderick JP, Kothari RU, et al.
6. Xian Y, Smith EE, Zhao X, et al.
Does the National Institutes of Health
Strategies used by hospitals to improve
Stroke Scale favor left hemisphere strokes?
speed of tissue-type plasminogen activator
NINDS t-PA Stroke Study Group. Stroke
treatment in acute ischemic stroke. Stroke
1999;30(11):2355Y2359. doi:10.1161/
2014;45(5):1387Y1395. doi:10.1161/
01.STR.30.11.2355.
STROKEAHA.113.003898.
16. Sato S, Toyoda K, Uehara T, et al.
7. Rabinstein AA. Treatment of acute
Baseline NIH Stroke Scale Score predicting
ischemic stroke. Continuum
outcome in anterior and posterior
(Minneap Minn) 2017;
circulation strokes. Neurology 2008;
23(1 Cerebrovascular Disease):62Y81.
70(24 pt 2):2371Y2377. doi:10.1212/
8. McManus M, Liebeskind DS. Blood pressure 01.wnl.0000304346.14354.0b.
in acute ischemic stroke. J Clin Neurol
17. Martin-Schild S, Albright KC, Tanksley J,
2016;12(2):137Y146. doi:10.3988/
et al. Zero on the NIHSS does not
jcn.2016.12.2.137Y146. doi:10.3988/jcn.2016.
equal the absence of stroke. Ann Emerg
9. Qureshi AI, Ezzeddine MA, Nasar A, et al. Med 2011;57(1):42Y45. doi:10.1016/
Prevalence of elevated blood pressure in j.annemergmed.2010.06.564.
563,704 adult patients with stroke
18. Goyal MS, Hoff BG, Williams J,
presenting to the ED in the United States.
et al. Streamlined hyperacute
Am J Emerg Med 2007;25(1):32Y38.
magnetic resonance imaging protocol
doi:10.1016/j.ajem.2006.07.008.
identifies tissue-type plasminogen
10. Jauch EC, Saver JL, Adams HP Jr, et al. activator-eligible stroke patients when
Guidelines for the early management of clinical impression is stroke mimic.
patients with acute ischemic stroke: a Stroke 2016;47(4):1012Y1017.
guideline for healthcare professionals from doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.115.011913.
the American Heart Association/American
19. Wintermark M, Sanelli PC, Albers GW,
Stroke Association. Stroke
et al. Imaging recommendations for acute
2013;44(3):870Y947. doi:10.1161/
stroke and transient ischemic attack
STR.0b013e318284056a.
patients: a joint statement by the American
11. Brott T, Adams HP Jr, Olinger CP, et al. Society of Neuroradiology, the American
Measurements of acute cerebral infarction: College of Radiology, and the Society of
a clinical examination scale. Stroke NeuroInterventional Surgery. AJNR Am J
1989;20(7):864Y870. doi:10.1161/ Neuroradiol 2013;34(11):E117YE127.
01.STR.20.7.864. doi:10.3174/ajnr.A3690.
Treatment of Acute
Address correspondence to
Dr Alejandro Rabinstein, Mayo
Clinic, Department of
Neurology, W8B, 200 First St
SW, Rochester, MN 55905,
[email protected].
Relationship Disclosure:
Ischemic Stroke
Dr Rabinstein serves as an Alejandro A. Rabinstein, MD, FAAN
associate editor for
Neurocritical Care; on the
editorial boards of Continuum:
Lifelong Learning in Neurology, ABSTRACT
the Journal of Stroke and
Cerebrovascular Diseases, Purpose of Review: This article provides an update on the state of the art of the
Neurology, and Stroke; and on emergency treatment of acute ischemic stroke with particular emphasis on the
the scientific advisory board of alternatives for reperfusion therapy.
Portola Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Dr Rabinstein receives research/ Recent Findings: The results of several randomized controlled trials consistently
grant support from DJO Global, and conclusively demonstrating that previously functional patients with disabling
Inc, and royalties from Elsevier, strokes from a proximal intracranial artery occlusion benefit from prompt recanaliza-
Oxford University Press, and
UpToDate, Inc. tion with mechanical thrombectomy using a retrievable stent have changed the
Unlabeled Use of landscape of acute stroke therapy. Mechanical thrombectomy within 6 hours of
Products/Investigational symptom onset should now be considered the preferred treatment for these patients
Use Disclosure:
Dr Rabinstein reports
along with IV thrombolysis with recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rtPA) within
no disclosure. the first 4.5 hours for all patients who do not have contraindications for systemic
* 2017 American Academy thrombolysis. Patients who are ineligible for IV rtPA can also benefit from mechanical
of Neurology. thrombectomy. Collateral status and time to reperfusion are the main determinants
of outcome.
Summary: Timely successful reperfusion is the most effective treatment for patients
with acute ischemic stroke. Systems of care should be optimized to maximize the
number of patients with acute ischemic stroke able to receive reperfusion therapy.
KEY POINTS
h IV thrombolysis with hoped that this trial will answer the stroke onset, but regulatory agencies
rtPA and endovascular question whether tight glycemic control in most other countries (including
thrombectomy with is safe and beneficial after an acute is- those in the European Union) have
a retrievable stent chemic stroke. Fever is associated with approved its administration within
are both solidly worse clinical results; thus, treating fever 4.5 hours of stroke onset.
established treatments may be beneficial.6 The value of hypo- The initial evaluation of a patient
for appropriate thermia continues to be investigated. with a possible acute stroke in the
candidates with acute Preventing infections (which notably emergency department should focus
ischemic stroke. includes dysphagia assessment before on establishing whether the patient is
h Time to reperfusion is a any oral intake) and early recurrent eligible for reperfusion therapy. Nec-
major determinant of strokes are additional priorities in the essary information includes the time
outcome in acute care of the patient with acute stroke. the patient was last known to be well,
ischemic stroke. medical conditions or recent surgery
h Randomized ACUTE REPERFUSION that could contraindicate thrombolysis,
placebo-controlled trials TREATMENTS neurologic examination to calculate the
have demonstrated that There is incontrovertible evidence National Institutes of Health Stroke
IV thrombolysis with that IV thrombolysis with rtPA and Scale (NIHSS) score, a capillary glucose
rtPA is beneficial for endovascular thrombectomy with a level, blood pressure, and brain imaging
patients with acute
retrievable stent improve neurologic (CT scan with or without a CT angio-
ischemic stroke up to
outcomes in patients with acute ische- gram depending on whether endovas-
4.5 hours from
symptom onset.
mic stroke. Both treatments should cular therapy is being considered).
be administered as quickly as possi- Recently, the indications and contra-
h Some previously cited ble after stroke onset, can be com- indications for IV rtPA have been re-
contraindications for IV
bined, and are safe in appropriately visited in a scientific statement of the
thrombolysis have been
revisited, thus expanding
selected candidates. American Heart Association (AHA)12
the pool of patients IV thrombolysis and mechanical and modified by the FDA in the pack-
who can be considered thrombectomy can produce reperfu- age insert for the drug (Table 3-113).
good candidates for sion injury after recanalization. Re- As a result, more patients can be con-
this treatment. perfusion injury can manifest with sidered for IV thrombolysis in clinical
hemorrhage and edema. It is more practice. IV thrombolysis should not be
severe when the area of established withheld because of advanced age, and
infarction is larger. Good patient se- mild but disabling deficits justify treat-
lection (ie, absence of a large ischemic ment. Individualized clinical judgment
core) and prompt treatment are cru- is necessary when deciding whether to
cial to avoid this complication. recommend thrombolysis to patients
with weaker indications (such as non-
Intravenous Thrombolysis disabling deficits) or relative contrain-
IV thrombolysis with rtPA is proven to dications. The safety and efficacy of
be effective in improving functional IV thrombolysis in pediatric patients
outcomes after an ischemic stroke up (younger than 18 years of age) is not
to 4.5 hours after symptom onset.1,7Y9 well established.
Randomized controlled trials8,9 fol- IV rtPA infused within 3 hours of
lowed by large observational studies symptom onset increases the chances
confirming the rates of recovery noted of functional independence at 3 months
in these trials10 and meta-analyses7 by one-third.7,8 The benefit is time de-
support this therapeutic indication pendent and much stronger when the
(Figure 3-111). The US Food and Drug drug is administered within the first
Administration (FDA) has only ap- 90 minutes after symptom onset (esti-
proved rtPA for use within 3 hours of mated number necessary to treat to help
64 ContinuumJournal.com February 2017
FIGURE 3-1 Results of meta-analysis of individual data from major randomized trials of IV
recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rtPA) (alteplase) for acute ischemic
stroke showing that thrombolysis increases the chances of achieving a modified
Rankin Scale score of 0 to 1 (no symptoms or mild symptoms with no disability) at 90 days.
Notice that the benefit is time dependent and no longer significant when the drug is
administered more than 4.5 hours after symptom onset. Treatment is beneficial in patients older
than 80 years, and the benefit is fairly consistent across all degrees of initial stroke severity.
CI = confidence interval; NIHSS = National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale.
Reprinted with permission from Emberson J, et al, Lancet Neurol.11 B 2014 Emberson et al. thelancet.com/journals/
lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(14)60584-5/fulltext.
one more patient achieve functional receive either 0.9 mg/kg or 0.6 mg/kg
independence is 3.6 within the first of IV rtPA within 4.5 hours of stroke
90 minutes and 4.3 between 91 and onset.16 The reduced dose was inferior
180 minutes) 14 (Case 3-1). Older to the standard dose for the end point
patients and those with a very severe of death or any degree of disability at
stroke at presentation have worse 90 days, although it was associated with
prognosis15 but can still benefit from a lower risk of symptomatic intracere-
IV rtPA. The benefit is less robust bral hemorrhage (which was low in
for patients treated between 3 and both treatment groups).
4.5 hours, but rtPA is still beneficial in No other thrombolytic agent has
this extended window (number neces- been approved for use in ischemic
sary to treat 5.9).9,14 stroke. In emergency departments of
The standard dose of IV rtPA for medical centers with more limited
acute ischemic stroke is 0.9 mg/kg, capabilities, patients can receive the
with 10% administered as a bolus and bolus of rtPA and then be transferred
the remainder infused over 1 hour. to a primary stroke center or compre-
The total dose should not exceed hensive stroke center while the rest of
90 mg. The phase 3 Enhanced Control the dose of the drug is being infused
of Hypertension and Thrombolysis (the drip-and-ship strategy).
Stroke Study (ENCHANTED) enrolled Hemorrhage is the most dangerous
3310 predominantly Asian patients to complication after thrombolysis. The
TABLE 3-1 Indications and Contraindications for IV Recombinant Tissue Plasminogen Activator
American Heart Association American Heart Association US Food and Drug Administration
Guideline 20131 Scientific Statement 201512 (FDA) Package Insert 201513
Indications
Diagnosis of ischemic stroke with Same Same
measurable neurologic deficit
Symptom onseta within 4.5 hours Same Within 3 hours
Age Q18 years Same Warning for age 977 years with risk
factors for intracranial hemorrhage
Contraindications
Severe head trauma within Same Contraindicated
3 months
Ischemic stroke within 3 months Risk increased, but degree is unclear Removedb
Arterial puncture at Risk uncertain Not listed
noncompressible site within
7 days
Previous intracranial Same Warning for recent intracranial
hemorrhage hemorrhage (contraindicated if
active intracranial hemorrhage)
Suspected subarachnoid Same Contraindicated
hemorrhage
Intracranial neoplasm, Probably recommended if Contraindicated
arteriovenous malformation extraaxial neoplasm is present; not
(AVM), or aneurysm recommended if intraaxial neoplasm
is present; risk unclear for AVM;
probably recommended if unruptured
unsecured aneurysm G10 mm is
present, but risk unclear if greater size
Recent intracranial or Same Contraindicated
intraspinal surgery
(within 3 months)
Active internal bleeding Same Contraindicated
Systolic blood pressure (BP) Same, but treatment recommended Contraindicated for severe uncontrolled
9185 mm Hg or diastolic BP if BP can be lowered safely hypertension (BP values removedb);
9110 mm Hg warning for BP 9175/110 mm Hg
Bleeding diathesis Consider case by case in patients Contraindicated for bleeding
with history of bleeding diathesis; diathesis (laboratory
International normalized
not recommended if INR 91.7, values removedb)
ratio (INR) 91.7
low-molecular-weight heparinoid
Heparin within 48 hours with within 24 hours, direct thrombin
abnormal activated partial inhibitor or factor Xa inhibitor
thromboplastin time within 48 hours (unless coagulation
3 testsc are normal)
Platelets G100,000/mm
Current use of direct thrombin
inhibitor or factor Xa inhibitor
c
with abnormal coagulation tests Continued on page 67
KEY POINT
h Most cases of
symptomatic intracerebral
Case 3-1
A 54-year-old woman presented with the sudden onset of left-sided
hemorrhage are caused
weakness and dysarthria. Her husband promptly called 911, and the
by reperfusion injury
patient arrived by ambulance to the emergency department 15 minutes
causing hemorrhagic
after symptom onset. Her National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS)
transformation of an
score was 6. Noncontrast CT scan showed no hemorrhage, acute ischemic
already severe stroke.
changes, or hyperdense vessel sign. She had no contraindications for
thrombolysis. IV rtPA was started 32 minutes after symptom onset. Within
the following 2 hours, the patient improved remarkably, and the following
day she had no residual symptoms.
Comment. The benefit from IV thrombolysis for patients with acute
ischemic stroke is highly dependent on time to administration.
Administration of the bolus within 60 to 90 minutes affords maximal
chances of improvement. In order to treat patients within this short time
window, it is essential to optimize the efficiency of early evaluation, CT
scanning, and drug delivery. In the United States, stroke centers are
expected to be able to consistently administer IV rtPA within 60 minutes of
patient arrival to the emergency department.
TABLE 3-2 Summary of the Main Trials Evaluating Mechanical Thrombectomy With
Retrievable Stents for Acute Ischemic Stroke
KEY POINTS
h Careful assessment of pedient method to quantify the extent
brain imaging is TABLE 3-3 Candidates for of early ischemic damage (Figure 3-335).36
Acute Endovascular However, the noncontrast CT scan is
necessary to exclude Stroke Therapy
a large established not sensitive for the visualization of
infarction (core). early ischemia. One of the trials used
b Age Q18 years
h The optimal radiologic multiphase CT angiography to evaluate
method to select
b NIHSS score Q6 collateral vessels,26 and another re-
candidates for b Time from symptom onset quired a CT perfusion showing a
endovascular therapy is to groin puncture G6 hours limited infarct core and evidence of
not yet established, but b Good prestroke functional penumbra before randomization.27
the Alberta Stroke status Furthermore, many patients in trials
Programs Early CT that did not require CT perfusion by
Score, evaluation of b ASPECTS score Q6 on baseline
CT scan protocol had this imaging before in-
collaterals on CT clusion in the study because that was
angiography, and CT b Presence of proximal
the prevailing practice in the enrolling
perfusion or MRI intracranial artery occlusion
center.25,28 CT perfusion can provide
diffusion/perfusion are ASPECTS = Alberta Stroke Program Early
all available options. CT Score; CT = computed tomography; more reliable assessment of the is-
NIHSS = National Institutes of Health chemic region, but its acquisition re-
Stroke Scale.
quires additional time. MRI diffusion/
perfusion is broadly considered the
most accurate method to determine
mechanical thrombectomy for pa- the ischemic core and the extent of the
tients with acute ischemic stroke. In penumbra, but this technique is less
particular, the best imaging modal- available. New software packages
ity to select patients for the inter- promise to accelerate the time re-
vention remains to be determined. quired to obtain perfusion imaging.
All trials excluded patients with an Yet, at this time, it is unclear if the
Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score additional time needed to obtain these
(ASPECTS) lower than 6 on baseline images is justified.37 Figure 3-438 illus-
CT scan. The ASPECTS provides an ex- trates the current work flow in the
Case 3-2
A 62-year-old man without past medical history collapsed in his bathroom. The noise alerted his son,
who found his father on the ground, unable to move the right side of his body and mute. He
immediately called an ambulance. Paramedics in the field noted a blood pressure of 180/100 mm Hg
and an irregularly irregular pulse. In the emergency department, the patient had a fluctuating level of
alertness, forced left gaze deviation, a right visual field deficit, global aphasia with mutism, right
hemiplegia, and severe right hypoesthesia. His National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score
was 22. Noncontrast head CT scan showed a hyperdense left middle cerebral artery sign, but his
Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score (ASPECTS) was 10 (Figure 3-2A). CT angiogram showed a flow
gap in the left middle cerebral artery with good collateral flow distal to it (Figure 3-2B). IV
thrombolysis was started 55 minutes after symptom onset, and the patient was taken to the angiographic
suite for endovascular therapy. Groin puncture took place 67 minutes after symptom onset. Initial
injection of contrast into the left internal carotid artery showed that this vessel was occluded at the top of
its supraclinoid segment (Figure 3-2C). Complete recanalization with full reperfusion was rapidly
achieved with mechanical thrombectomy using a retrievable stent (Figure 3-2D). The patient began
improving on the angiographic table and continued to improve overnight. By the next morning, his
NIHSS score was 3. Repeat CT scan showed a small infarction in the left lenticular nucleus (Figure 3-2E).
At 3 months, the patient had full function and no residual symptoms.
Continued on page 74
FIGURE 3-2 Imaging of the patient in Case 3-2. A, CT scan of the brain showing hyperdensity in the left middle cerebral
artery consistent with acute thrombus (arrow). B, CT angiogram showing a focal area of left middle cerebral
artery occlusion (arrow) with good collateral flow in the vessels distal to the occlusion. C, Digital subtraction
angiogram demonstrating occlusion of the distal segment of the left internal carotid artery as well as intact collaterals
supplying the peripheral middle cerebral artery branches. D, Full recanalization and reperfusion after mechanical
thrombectomy. E, Repeat CT scan showing a small residual infarction in the left basal ganglia (arrow).
evaluation and treatment of acute is- Randomized Clinical Trial of Endovas- KEY POINT
chemic stroke. cular Treatment for Acute Ischemic h Endovascular
A growing body of evidence sug- Stroke in the Netherlands (MR CLEAN) interventions for acute
stroke should be
gests that interventions performed trial.40 It is becoming increasingly clear
performed under
under conscious sedation have better that most interventions can be safely
conscious sedation
outcomes than those performed un- completed using conscious sedation. whenever possible.
der general anesthesia. This finding An appropriately powered large ran-
was first reported in retrospective domized trial will be necessary to
studies39 and subsequently confirmed conclusively determine if conscious
in a subanalysis of the Multicenter sedation should be preferred over
FIGURE 3-4 Graphic illustrating the sequence of steps in contemporary acute stroke therapy. IV thrombolysis should be given to
all patients without contraindications within 60 minutes of their arrival to the emergency department. The use of
perfusion imaging is considered optional at this time. Ideally, the time from the qualifying scan to the groin
puncture in candidates for endovascular therapy should be shorter than 60 minutes.
CT = computed tomography; DSA = digital subtraction angiography; IV = intravenous; rtPA = recombinant tissue plasminogen activator.
Reprinted with permission from Rabinstein AA, Nat Rev Neurol.38 B 2016 Alejandro A. Rabinstein. nature.com/nrneurol/journal/v12/n2/full/nrneurol.2015.241.html.
Case 3-3
A 74-year-old woman with a history of atrial fibrillation on aspirin woke up with speech difficulties
and right-sided weakness. She was feeling well when she had gone to bed the night before. Her
husband called an ambulance, and upon arrival to the emergency department, she had a National
Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score of 15. CT scan of the brain was unremarkable, but CT
angiogram showed occlusion of the left middle cerebral artery with good collateral flow (Figure 3-5A).
CT perfusion demonstrated a large mismatch between the cerebral blood flow (Figure 3-5B) and
the cerebral blood volume (Figure 3-5C) throughout the entire left middle cerebral artery territory.
Consequently, the patient was taken to the angiographic suite and underwent successful recanalization
of the left middle cerebral artery by means of a retrievable stent (Figures 3-5D and 3-5E). She experienced
great clinical improvement over the subsequent 3 days. Follow-up CT scan is shown in Figure 3-5F. At
3 months, she had regained full function.
FIGURE 3-5 Imaging of the patient in Case 3-3. A, CT angiogram showing occlusion of the left middle cerebral artery (arrow);
collateral flow distal to the occlusion was satisfactory. B, Cerebral blood flow image of the CT perfusion
disclosing hypoperfusion throughout the left middle cerebral artery distribution. C, Cerebral blood volume
image of the CT perfusion showing no definite areas of established infarction. D, Digital subtraction angiogram confirming
the presence of an occlusive/subocclusive clot in the proximal left middle cerebral artery. E, Angiographic run after full
reperfusion following treatment with a retrievable stent. F, On follow-up CT scan 24 hours later, a relatively small infarction in
comparison with the initial region of hypoperfusion in the left basal ganglia and internal capsule is seen (arrow).
Comment. Wake-up strokes and strokes of unclear time of onset are particularly problematic because
these cases were not included in the trials supporting IV thrombolysis or mechanical thrombectomy.
Yet, patients with small infarct core and large penumbra can be good candidates for acute reperfusion
therapy. This is one of the situations in which the use of penumbral imaging (CT perfusion or MR
diffusion/perfusion) can be invaluable to identify good candidates for treatment. Ongoing trials should
be able to establish the best strategy for treatment of stroke with uncertain time of onset.
to small case series and one pilot should be given unless a solid contra-
feasibility study.56 Yet, hemodynamic indication exists.
augmentation with vasopressors can At this juncture, efforts should be
occasionally work, in particular in pa- concentrated on refining systems of
tients with proximal vessel occlusions care to allow more patients to have
who are not deemed candidates for access to reperfusion treatment. Ex-
endovascular recanalization or in panding the number of candidates for
whom the recanalization attempt was intervention will require continuous
unsuccessful. Mechanical techniques education of the community to recog-
for collateral recruitment (such as ex- nize signs of stroke, improving the
ternal counterpulsation and intraaortic initial triage of patients with stroke,
inflation devices) have been shown and speeding evaluation and treat-
feasible and safe, but their efficacy ment in the hospital. Ongoing trials
remains to be proven.57 are also evaluating the possibility of
The evolution of emergency treat- extending the therapeutic window by
ment for acute ST-segment elevation using advanced imaging modalities to
myocardial infarction can inform the identify patients in whom good collat-
future of acute stroke therapy from a erals have preserved tissue viability for
proximal artery occlusion. Fibrinolysis a longer time. Collateral augmentation
followed by endovascular therapy was strategies and ultra-early administra-
initially a common practice but was tion of neuroprotective agents may
later abandoned after randomized tri- provide additional treatment venues
als demonstrated that proceeding di- in the future.
rectly to the endovascular intervention
was a superior strategy. Once systems REFERENCES
of care are optimized to guarantee fast 1. Jauch EC, Saver JL, Adams HP Jr, et al.
access to the angiographic suite for Guidelines for the early management of
patients with acute stroke, it will be patients with acute ischemic stroke: a
guideline for healthcare professionals from
necessary to perform a trial comparing the American Heart Association/American
IV thrombolysis followed by mechan- Stroke Association. Stroke 2013;
ical thrombectomy versus primary 44(3):870Y947. doi:10.1161/
mechanical thrombectomy for patients STR.0b013e318284056a.
with severe stroke and proven proximal 2. Donnan GA, Baron JC, Ma H, Davis SM.
Penumbral selection of patients for trials of
artery occlusion. acute stroke therapy. Lancet Neurol
2009;8(3):261Y269. doi:10.1016/
S1474-4422(09)70041-9.
CONCLUSION
3. ClinicalTrials.gov. Head Position in Stroke
Acute ischemic stroke is a medical Trial (HeadPoST). clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/
emergency in which every minute show/NCT02162017?term=head+of+
counts. Achievement of reperfusion bed+and+stroke&rank=2. Accessed
December 1, 2016.
can reverse neurologic deficits, even
if severe, and allow patients to regain 4. Godoy DA, Di Napoli M, Rabinstein AA.
Treating hyperglycemia in neurocritical
function. Two reperfusion strategies patients: benefits and perils. Neurocrit Care
are now proven: IV rtPA and mechan- 2010;13(3):425Y438. doi:10.1007/
ical thrombectomy. They are both safe s12028-010-9404-8.
and effective for the right candidates. 5. ClinicalTrials.gov. Stroke Hyperglycemia
Insulin Network Effort (SHINE) Trial.
Patient selection is crucial to optimize
clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/
outcomes, but the attitude of the NCT01369069?term=NCT01369069&rank=1.
clinician should be that treatment Accessed December 1, 2016.
27. Campbell BC, Mitchell PJ, Kleinig TJ, et al. 38. Rabinstein AA. Stroke in 2015: acute
Endovascular therapy for ischemic stroke endovascular recanalization therapy comes
with perfusion-imaging selection. N Engl J of age. Nat Rev Neurol 2016;12(2):67Y68.
Med 2015;372(11):1009Y1018. doi:10.1056/ doi:10.1038/nrneurol.2015.241.
NEJMoa1414792. 39. Brinjikji W, Murad MH, Rabinstein AA,
28. Saver JL, Goyal M, Bonafe A, et al. et al. Conscious sedation versus general
Stent-retriever thrombectomy after anesthesia during endovascular acute
intravenous t-PA vs. t-PA alone in stroke. ischemic stroke treatment: a systematic
N Engl Med 2015;372(24):2285Y2295. review and meta-analysis. AJNR Am J
doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1415061. Neuroradiol 2015;36(6):525Y529.
29. Jovin TG, Chamorro A, Cobo E, et al. doi:10.3174/ajnr.A4159.
Thrombectomy within 8 hours after 40. van den Berg LA, Koelman DL, Berkhemer
symptom onset in ischemic stroke. N Engl J OA, et al. Type of anesthesia and differences
Med 2015;372(24):2296Y2306. doi:10.1056/ in clinical outcome after intra-arterial
NEJMoa1503780. treatment for ischemic stroke. Stroke
30. Bracard S, Ducrocq X, Mas JL. Mechanical 2015;46(5):1257Y1262. doi:10.1161/
thrombectomy after intravenous alteplase STROKEAHA.115.008699.
versus alteplase alone after stroke (THRACE): 41. Manawadu D, Bodla S, Jarosz J, et al. A
a randomized controlled trial. Lancet Neurol case-controlled comparison of thrombolysis
2016;15(11):1138Y1147. doi:10.1016/ outcomes between wake-up and known
S1474-4422(16)30177-6. time of onset ischemic stroke patients.
31. Saver JL, Jahan R, Levy EI, et al. Solitaire flow Stroke 2013;44(8):2226Y2231. doi:10.1161/
restoration device versus the Merci Retriever STROKEAHA.111.000757.
in patients with acute ischaemic stroke 42. Thomalla G, Gerloff C. Treatment concepts
(SWIFT): a randomised, parallel-group, for wake-up stroke and stroke with
non-inferiority trial. Lancet 2012; unknown time of symptom onset. Stroke
380(9849):1241Y1249. doi:10.1016/ 2015;46(9):2707Y2713. doi:10.1161/
S0140-6736(12)61384-1. STROKEAHA.115.009701.
32. Nogueira RG, Lutsep HL, Gupta R, et al. 43. ClinicalTrials.gov. Trevo and Medical
Trevo versus Merci retrievers for Management Versus Medical Management
thrombectomy revascularisation of large Alone in Wake Up and Late Presenting
vessel occlusions in acute ischaemic stroke Strokes (DAWN). clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/
(TREVO 2): a randomised trial. The Lancet NCT02142283?term=NCT02142283&rank=1.
2012;380(9849):1231Y1240. doi:10.1016/ Accessed December 1, 2016.
S0140-6736(12)61299-9.
44. ClinicalTrials.gov. PerfusiOn Imaging
33. Goyal M, Menon BK, van Zwam WH, et al. Selection of Ischemic STroke Patients for
Endovascular thrombectomy after EndoVascular ThErapy (POSITIVE).
large-vessel ischaemic stroke: a clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01852201?term=
meta-analysis of individual patient data NCT01852201&rank=1. Accessed
from five randomised trials. Lancet December 1, 2016.
2016;387(10029):1723Y1731. doi:10.1016/
45. ClinicalTrials.gov. Endovascular Therapy
S0140-6736(16)00163-X.
Following Imaging Evaluation for
34. Grotta JC, Hacke W. Stroke neurologist’s
Ischemic Stroke 3 (DEFUSE 3). clinicaltrials.
perspective on the new endovascular trials.
gov/ct2/show/NCT02586415?term=
Stroke 2015;46(6):1447Y1452. doi:10.1161/
NCT02586415& rank=1. Accessed
STROKEAHA.115.008384.
December 1, 2016.
35. Puetz V, Dzialowski I, Hill MD, Demchuk AM.
46. ClinicalTrials.gov. A Study of Intravenous
The Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score
Thrombolysis With Alteplase in MRI-Selected
in clinical practice: what have we learned?
Patients (MR WITNESS). clinicaltrials.gov/
Int J Stroke 2009;4(5);354Y364. doi:10.1111/
ct2/show/NCT01282242?term=NCT01282242
j.1747-4949.2009.00337.x.
&rank=1. Accessed December 1, 2016.
36. Pexman JH, Barber PA, Hill MD, et al. Use of
the Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score 47. Khatri P, Conaway MR, Johnston KC.
(ASPECTS) for assessing CT scans in patients Ninety-day outcome rates of a prospective
with acute stroke. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol cohort of consecutive patients with mild
2001;22(8):1534Y1542. ischemic stroke. Stroke 2012;43(2):560Y562.
doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.110.593897.
37. Campbell BC, Donnan GA, Lees KR, et al.
Endovascular stent thrombectomy: the 48. ClinicalTrials.gov. A Study of the Efficacy
new standard of care for large vessel and Safety of Activase (Alteplase) in Patients
ischaemic stroke. Lancet Neurol With Mild Stroke (PRISMS). clinicaltrials.gov/
2015;14(8):846Y854. doi:10.1016/ ct2/show/NCT02072226?term=NCT02072226&
S1474-4422(15)00140-4. rank=1. Accessed December 1, 2016.
Diagnosis and
Address correspondence to
Dr Shelagh Coutts, Foothills
Medical Centre, 1403 29th St
NW, C1242, Calgary, AB,
Canada T2N 2T9,
[email protected].
Relationship Disclosure:
Management
Dr Coutts receives
research/grant support from
the Canadian Institutes
of Transient
of Health Research
(CRH-112319), the Heart
and Stroke Foundation of
Canada (G-16-00012585),
Ischemic Attack
and Genome Canada Shelagh B. Coutts, MD, MSc, FRCPC
(143TIA-Penn).
Unlabeled Use of
Products/Investigational
Use Disclosure: ABSTRACT
Dr Coutts reports no disclosure. Purpose of Review: This article reviews the diagnosis, investigation, and recom-
* 2017 American Academy mended management after a transient ischemic attack (TIA) and discusses how to
of Neurology.
make an accurate diagnosis, including the diagnosis of mimics of TIAs.
Recent Findings: Up to a 10% risk of recurrent stroke exists after a TIA, and up to
80% of this risk is preventable with urgent assessment and treatment. Imaging of
the brain and intracranial and extracranial blood vessels using CT, CT angiography,
carotid Doppler ultrasound, and MRI is an important part of the diagnostic assess-
ment. Treatment options include anticoagulation for atrial fibrillation, carotid revas-
cularization for symptomatic carotid artery stenosis, antiplatelet therapy, and vascular
risk factor reduction strategies.
Summary: TIA offers the greatest opportunity to prevent stroke that physicians
encounter. A TIA should be treated as a medical emergency, as up to 80% of strokes
after TIA are preventable.
interchangeably and recorded as such nitions of stroke and TIA is that they
in medical records. Although this article rely on the presumed cause of the symp-
focuses primarily on TIA, a significant toms: ischemia. Symptoms are attrib-
difference in the outcome of TIA com- uted to ischemia based mainly on the
pared to minor ischemic stroke has not time course of the deficits (an acute
been demonstrated by compelling evi- deficit is more consistent with ische-
dence. Treatment to prevent ischemic mia), the distribution of the deficits,
stroke following TIA and treatment to and background risk factors for ische-
prevent recurrent stroke following mia in the patient. Because patients
minor ischemic stroke are also similar. vary in reliability in reporting the events
Very early assessment of these patients they have experienced, even an astute
also makes the distinction between TIA physician may find it challenging to
and minor ischemic stroke difficult. make a certain diagnosis based on the
The diagnosis of TIA depends on history and physical examination alone.
the quality and quantity of information Even experts do not agree about which
available and the time of assessment. clinical events are in fact TIAs.5Y7
The main criteria used are the clinical One of the problems with assessment
history or objective findings on neuro- is that half of all patients presenting to
logic examination consistent with focal emergency departments and physicians’
neurologic dysfunction at some point offices in North America with transient
of the evaluation and imaging of the or mild neurologic deficits have symp-
brain. A limitation of the clinical defi- toms with an uncertain diagnosis or
KEY POINT
h Making the correct prognosis. Some have, indeed, had an Although the proportion of patients
diagnosis of transient ischemic event, but others have had with true ischemia is lower in those
ischemic attack is key, symptoms related to a stroke or TIA without motor or speech symptoms,
as 50% of patients mimic, such as migraine, epilepsy, multi- it is important not to miss patients
assessed for possible ple sclerosis, or peripheral nerve en- with true TIAs and minor ischemic
transient ischemic trapment (Case 4-2). The prevalence strokes.10,11
attack will have an of these mimics is higher among clin-
alternative diagnosis ical presentations without motor and TAKING A HISTORY FROM A
(ie, are a mimic). speech symptoms. Motor and speech PATIENT WITH A POSSIBLE
symptoms may have a higher likeli- TRANSIENT ISCHEMIC ATTACK
hood of brain ischemia as the cause The diagnosis of TIA remains largely
of the symptoms because the differ- clinical and is based on taking an
ential diagnosis for such clinical pre- accurate history. This contributes to
sentations is much narrower, and the variability in the diagnosis of TIA,
patients who present with motor or with high rates of disagreement seen
speech symptoms are known to be at even between neurologists.5 As many
high risk for recurrent stroke.8 However, as 60% of patients referred to a TIA
patients who present with symptoms clinic will not have a final diagnosis
other than motor and speech symp- of TIA.12,13 Identification of possible
toms (eg, sensory symptoms or dizzi- TIA mimics is an important stage in
ness) have a more uncertain etiology.9 the assessment of patients with tran-
This is likely related to the higher sient neurologic symptoms. An accu-
probability of a nonischemic cause of rate diagnosis of a stroke mimic impacts
symptoms in these patients. Posterior treatment decisions and provides reas-
circulation ischemia can pose an ad- surance when the diagnosis is some-
ditional diagnostic challenge as symp- thing more benign than TIA.
toms are more variable than those that The clinical history is most accurate
occur with hemispheric ischemia.10 when taken close to the resolution of
Case 4-2
A 75-year-old man presented to the emergency department after
experiencing a 10-minute episode of right hand weakness 2 hours earlier,
after which he completely returned to normal. He had no significant
past medical history and was on no medications. Neurologic examination
was normal. Urgent brain CT showed a left-sided chronic subdural
hematoma. He was referred for neurosurgical assessment.
Comment. Many different mimics of transient ischemic attack exist, as in
this case. Hemorrhage is a rare, but important, cause of transient neurologic
symptoms. This case highlights the recommendation that all patients with
transient neurologic symptoms should have brain imaging not only to look
for ischemia but also to look for other causes of transient neurologic
symptoms. It also emphasizes the fact that clinically one cannot reliably
diagnose brain hemorrhage; brain imaging is necessary to differentiate
between ischemia and hemorrhage. Subdural hematomas are common in
the elderly and may occur spontaneously without a history of trauma. The
mechanism behind why subdural hematomas can present with transient
neurologic symptoms is not entirely clear, but theories include mechanical
compression of vessels, partial seizures, or spreading cortical depression.
KEY POINT
h All patients with possible oxygen saturation can be useful to iden- rospectively recorded clinical features
transient ischemic attack tify the occasional patient who has of TIA associated with a higher risk of
require structural two concurrent diagnoses, such as TIA stroke are motor or speech symptoms
imaging of the brain to and pulmonary embolus or a myocar- and long duration. The total ABCD2
rule out mimics. dial infarction. score ranges from 0 to 7, with points
After basic investigations are com- given for five clinical factors: (1) age
pleted, brain imaging is key. In many 60 or older (1 point); (2) blood pres-
parts of the world, the first point of sure 140/90 mm Hg or higher (1 point);
assessment for patients with possible (3) clinical features of unilateral weak-
TIA is the emergency department; in ness (2 points) or speech impairment
this setting, a noncontrast CT scan of without weakness (1 point); (4) dura-
the brain is usually the first imaging tion of symptoms 60 minutes or more
study obtained. This is a key investi- (2 points) or 10 to 59 minutes (1 point);
gation as it rules out structural causes and (5) presence of diabetes mellitus
for the symptoms, such as subdural (1 point). The ABCD2 score was well
hematoma (Case 4-2), intracranial hem- validated on independent cohorts
orrhage, or brain tumor. with areas under the curve of 0.62 to
0.83 (0I5 = chance prediction and
PROGNOSIS 1I0 = perfect prediction). More im-
About 10% of patients presenting with portant, this score allowed stratifica-
TIAs or minor strokes will have a stroke tion of patients into high risk (score 6
within the next 90 days,8,15,16 with or 7, 8.1% 2-day risk of stroke), mod-
the highest risk period being the first erate risk (score 4 or 5, 4.1% 2-day risk
24 hours.17 Wide consensus exists that of stroke), and low risk (score 0 to 3, 1%
TIA and minor ischemic stroke are 2-day risk of stroke).
medical emergencies that necessitate The ABCD2 score has emphasized
immediate management.18 that taking a detailed history is impor-
tant, and it has raised awareness
Clinical/Event Features within the general medical community
and Scores that recognizing TIA is an important
Certain clinical features have been as- way of preventing stroke. However,
sociated with recurrent stroke after TIA. the problem with the ABCD2 score is
These include diabetes mellitus,8 hy- that patients in the low-risk category
pertension,19,20 symptom duration, and still have recurrent strokes.22 Also, in
weakness or speech disturbance.8,20 terms of absolute numbers, the majority
Using a combination of factors, clinical of recurrent strokes are in the moderate
risk stratification tools have been de- category. Some patients who are classi-
veloped to help identify patients at fied as having low risk on the ABCD2
high risk of recurrent events, includ- score may have important potentially
ing the California,8 ABCD (age, blood treatable TIA etiologies, such as symp-
pressure, clinical features, duration),20 tomatic carotid artery stenosis or atrial
and ABCD2 (which adds the presence fibrillation, that require urgent treat-
of diabetes mellitus to the factors mea- ment.23 These limitations have pre-
sured in ABCD)21 scores,with the aim vented widespread adoption of the
of determining the need for urgent ABCD2 score to triage patients with TIA.24
hospitalization and investigation. These The Rotterdam Study25 followed
scores were mostly developed with ret- patients with transient neurologic at-
rospective data. From these studies,8,20 tacks for 10 years and found an
it was determined that the major ret- increased risk of stroke not only in
86 ContinuumJournal.com February 2017
KEY POINTS
h Although the presence Many stroke neurologists find MRI tients get the appropriate early assess-
of a lesion seen on particularly helpful in cases in which ment and treatment (Table 4-130).
diffusion-weighted the diagnosis is not 100% clear based
imaging can be helpful on the history. MRI results must TREATMENT
by proving that ischemia always be taken in the appropriate Recognition and management of TIA
occurred, the absence clinical context. Most stroke neurolo- offers the greatest opportunity to pre-
of a lesion does not rule gists would agree that patients who vent disabling stroke. Studies have
out ischemia. have a negative DWI but have truly shown up to an 80% reduction in the
h Finding out why a had TIAs clearly exist, and thus they risk of stroke after TIA with the early
transient ischemic will treat patients for TIA even with a implementation of secondary stroke
attack occurred is the negative DWI. There has been some prevention strategies,11,12 including
key to preventing a discussion over the past few years revascularization of patients with
recurrent stroke. about calling transient symptoms a symptomatic carotid artery stenosis,
h Recognition and clinical TIA, but calling symptoms in anticoagulation of patients with atrial
management of combination with a lesion seen on fibrillation, treatment with anti-
transient ischemic attack DWI a stroke. From a practical per- platelet agent(s), treatment with
offers the greatest spective, it does not matter what it is statins for most patients, manage-
opportunity to prevent called; what is important is that pa- ment of hypertension, and lifestyle
disabling stroke.
TABLE 4-1 Clinical and Imaging Features That Increase the Risk
of a Recurrent Stroke or Symptom Progression After
Transient Ischemic Attack or Minor Strokea
Case 4-3
A 50-year-old man presented to the emergency department with an episode
of left hemiplegia that lasted 5 minutes. He smoked cigarettes but otherwise
had no significant past medical history. His examination was normal, with
blood pressure of 125/75 mm Hg and an ABCD2 (age, blood pressure, clinical
features, duration,
presence of diabetes
mellitus) score of 2.
Head CT was normal,
but CT angiography
showed a high-grade
stenosis of the right
internal carotid artery
(Figure 4-2). He was
started on 81 mg aspirin
and 40 mg of simvastatin
daily. The patient
underwent right carotid
endarterectomy the
next day without
complication.
Comment. This
patient had a transient
ischemic attack and was
at high risk of early FIGURE 4-2 CT angiogram demonstrating
recurrent stroke, although high-grade right internal carotid artery
stenosis (red arrow).
it was not identified as
such by the ABCD2 score.
Carotid artery stenosis is an important cause of a transient ischemic attack
with a high risk of recurrence. Early vascular imaging is required to
identify this treatable cause of stroke. Carotid revascularization should be
performed as soon as reasonably possible if the patient is medically stable.
Ischemic Attack to Prevent Early Re- medical management alone. The study
currence (FASTER) trial compared the results showed aggressive medical man-
effectiveness of 3 months of treat- agement alone was superior to stent-
ment with 81 mg aspirin and 75 mg ing in the prevention of recurrent
clopidogrel commenced within 24 hours stroke. Medical management included
of onset versus aspirin alone in pa- 325 mg aspirin and 75 mg clopidogrel
tients with minor strokes/TIAs.31 This for 90 days, together with intensive
trial was small and ended early because medical management of modifiable
of slow recruitment; however, there was vascular risk factors. Medical manage-
a suggestion that the combination ther- ment was superior to stenting because
apy may reduce recurrent stroke events of a combination of higher than ex-
with a low risk of complications. The pected periprocedural risk and a lower
Clopidogrel in High-risk Patients With recurrence rate in the medical man-
Acute Non-disabling Cerebrovascular agement arm. Both arms received dual
Events (CHANCE) trial32 was performed antiplatelet therapy, so it is not known
in China and randomly assigned 5170 if the combination of aspirin and clo-
high-risk patients with TIA (defined pidogrel reduced the recurrent stroke
as an ABCD2 score of 4 or higher at risk; however, the National Institutes
assignment) and minor stroke to treat- of Health (NIH)-sponsored Platelet-
ment within 24 hours of onset with Oriented Inhibition in New TIA and
either combination therapy with clo- Minor Ischemic Stroke (POINT) trial34
pidogrel and aspirin (clopidogrel is examining this question and is cur-
at an initial dose of 300 mg, followed rently enrolling patients. It is hoped
by 75 mg/d for 90 days, plus aspirin at that this study will provide a definitive
a dose of 75 mg/d for the first 21 days) answer. For now, North American sec-
or placebo plus aspirin (75 mg/d for ondary stroke prevention guidelines
90 days). Recurrent stroke was seen do not recommend dual antiplatelet
in 8.2% of patients in the clopidogrel- agent therapy.29
aspirin group, as compared with 11.7%
of those in the aspirin-only group Outpatient Versus Inpatient
(hazard ratio, 0.68; 95% confidence Assessment
interval, 0.57Y0.81; PG.001). The risk For stroke prevention, the location of
of hemorrhage was not different in treatment matters less than the speed
the two groups. The CHANCE trial has of the assessment. However, in most
issues with generalizability, including parts of the world, assessing patients
the fact that it was a Chinese-only pop- and completing urgent (on the same
ulation, a high proportion of males were day, within a few hours) imaging is most
included, and the proportion of pa- easily done in the emergency depart-
tients treated with antihypertensive and ment given the easy access to imaging.
lipid-lowering medications was less In clinical settings that do not have
than typically seen in North American access to timely outpatient neuroimag-
populations. In the Stenting vs. Aggres- ing, patients are often admitted to the
sive Medical Management for Preven- hospital to complete TIA evaluation and
ting Recurrent Stroke in Intracranial expedite initiation of secondary pre-
Stenosis (SAMMPRIS) study,33 patients vention strategies. Some advantages
with recently symptomatic severe intra- of admitting the patient to the hospital
cranial stenosis were randomly assigned include close neurologic monitoring
to intracranial stenting plus aggressive and early completion of investigations
medical management or aggressive and appropriate treatment.
90 ContinuumJournal.com February 2017
19. Hill MD, Yiannakoulias N, Jeerakathil T, et al. 27. Douglas VC, Johnston CM, Elkins J, et al.
The high risk of stroke immediately after Head computed tomography findings
transient ischemic attack: a population-based predict short-term stroke risk after
study. Neurology 2004;62(11):2015Y2020. transient ischemic attack. Stroke
doi:10.1212/01.WNL.0000129482.70315.2F. 2003;34(12):2894Y2898. doi:10.1161/
01.STR.0000102900.74360.D9.
20. Rothwell PM, Giles MF, Flossmann E,
et al. A simple score (ABCD) to identify 28. Coutts SB, Modi J, Patel SK, et al. CT/CT
individuals at high early risk of stroke angiography and MRI findings predict
after transient ischaemic attack. Lancet recurrent stroke after transient ischemic attack
2005;366(9479):29Y36. doi:10.1016/ and minor stroke: results of the prospective
S0140-6736(05)66702-5. CATCH study. Stroke 2012;43(4):1013Y1017.
doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.111.637421.
21. Johnston SC, Rothwell PM, Nguyen-Huynh
MN, et al. Validation and refinement of 29. Olivot JM, Wolford C, Castle J, et al. Two
scores to predict very early stroke risk after aces: transient ischemic attack work-up as
transient ischaemic attack. Lancet outpatient assessment of clinical evaluation
2007;369(9558):283Y292. doi:10.1016/ and safety. Stroke 2011;42(7):1839Y1843.
S0140-6736(07)60150-0. doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.110.608380.
22. Perry JJ, Sharma M, Sivilotti ML, et al. 30. Couillard P, Poppe AY, Coutts SB. Predicting
Prospective validation of the ABCD2 score recurrent stroke after minor stroke and
for patients in the emergency department transient ischemic attack. Expert Rev
with transient ischemic attack. CMAJ Cardiovasc Ther 2009;7(10):1273Y1281.
2011;183(10):1137Y1145. doi:10.1503/ doi:10.1586/erc.09.105.
cmaj.101668.
31. Kennedy J, Hill MD, Ryckborst KJ, et al. Fast
23. Wardlaw JM, Brazzelli M, Chappell FM, et al. assessment of stroke and transient ischaemic
ABCD2 score and secondary stroke prevention: attack to prevent early recurrence (FASTER):
meta-analysis and effect per 1,000 patients a randomised controlled pilot trial. Lancet
triaged. Neurology 2015;85(4):373Y380. Neurol 2007;6(11):961Y969. doi:10.1056/
doi:10.1212/WNL.0000000000001780. NEJMoa1215340.
24. Coutts SB, Wein TH, Lindsay MP, et al. Canadian 32. Wang Y, Wang Y, Zhao X, et al. Clopidogrel
Stroke Best Practice Recommendations: with aspirin in acute minor stroke or
secondary prevention of stroke guidelines, transient ischemic attack. N Engl J Med
update 2014. Int J Stroke 2015;10(3):282Y291. 2013;369(1):11Y19. doi:10.1056/
doi:10.1111/ijs.12439. NEJMoa1215340.
25. Bos MJ, van Rijn MJ, Witteman JC, et al. 33. Chimowitz MI, Lynn MJ, Derdeyn CP, et al.
Incidence and prognosis of transient Stenting versus aggressive medical therapy
neurological attacks. JAMA 2007;298(24): for intracranial arterial stenosis. N Engl J
2877Y2885. doi:10.1001/jama.298.24.2877. Med 2011;365(11):993Y1003. doi:10.1056/
NEJMoa1105335.
26. Paul NL, Simoni M, Rothwell PM, Oxford
Vascular Study. Transient isolated brainstem 34. Platelet-Oriented Inhibition in New TIA
symptoms preceding posterior circulation and Minor Ischemic Stroke (POINT) Trial
stroke: a population-based study. Lancet (POINT). clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/
Neurol 2013;12(1):65Y71. doi:10.1016/ NCT00991029. Updated July 18, 2016.
S1474-4422(12)70299-5. Accessed December 1, 2016.
Prevention and
Address correspondence to
Dr Josephine F. Huang,
4500 San Pablo Rd,
Department of Neurology,
KEY POINT
h Angioedema resulting have been reported up to 2 hours 2, with more confluent but still hetero-
from use of recombinant following IV rtPA infusion, and swell- geneous petechiae within the infarct;
tissue plasminogen ing can develop gradually over several (3) parenchymal hematoma 1, with a
activator often involves hours. In cases of life-threatening an- homogeneous hematoma involving
the unilateral tongue and gioedema, laryngospasm, and hypo- less than 30% of the infarct volume
lips contralateral to the tension, the infusion should be and with mild space-occupying effect;
side of the infarct. It is stopped immediately and the patient and (4) parenchymal hematoma 2, with
often mild and transient, treated with antihistamines, IV corti- a dense hematoma involving more
but in severe cases, costeroids, epinephrine, and endotra- than 30% of the infarct volume with
IV recombinant tissue cheal intubation for airway protection significant space-occupying effect
plasminogen activator
as clinically indicated. Favored treat- (Table 5-1). Hemorrhagic infarction 1,
should be stopped
ment is 50 mg IV diphenhydramine, hemorrhagic infarction 2, and paren-
immediately and
anaphylaxis
50 mg IV ranitidine, and 10 mg IV chymal hematoma 1 within the first
appropriately treated. dexamethasone. In severe cases or as 36 hours of stroke onset were not
clinically indicated, 0.3 mg IM epi- associated with a higher risk of neu-
nephrine can be added.5 Short-term rologic decline when compared to
maintenance doses of corticosteroids patients without hemorrhagic trans-
and antihistamines can be considered formation. Parenchymal hematoma 2
in cases of severe edema that fail to is associated with a significantly in-
promptly respond to the first doses creased risk of early deterioration and
of medications. 3-month mortality.
In the National Institute of Neuro- Most symptomatic intracranial hem-
logical Disorders and Strokes (NINDS) orrhages occur within the first 24 hours
trial, symptomatic intracranial hemor- following treatment. When intracranial
rhage was defined as hemorrhage seen hemorrhage is suspected, the adminis-
on CT within 36 hours of treatment, tration of thrombolytics should be
and deemed to be temporally related stopped until intracranial hemorrhage
to neurologic decline.6 Symptomatic is excluded. Once intracranial hemor-
intracranial hemorrhage occurred in rhage is confirmed on imaging, an
6.4% of patients treated with IV rtPA. initial dose of 10 units of cryopre-
The European Cooperative Acute cipitate should be transfused.9,10 If
Stroke Study (ECASS) III trial defined cryoprecipitate is contraindicated or
symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage unavailable in a timely fashion, consid-
as evidence of hemorrhage seen on CT eration can be made to use an anti-
or MRI that was felt to be associated fibrinolytic agent, such as IV tranexamic
with an increase in the National In- acid 10 mg/kg to 15 mg/kg over
stitutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) 20 minutes or IV *-aminocaproic acid
score of 4 or more points.7 Symptom- 5 g.10 Fibrinogen levels can be checked
atic intracranial hemorrhage occurred after administering reversal agents; if
in 2.4% of patients treated with IV rtPA the level is less than 150 mg/dL, addi-
in the extended treatment time window tional cryoprecipitate can be given.
of 3 to 4.5 hours. The benefit of using other agents, such
Figure 5-1 demonstrates the sub- as prothrombin complex concen-
types of hemorrhagic transformation trate, fibrinogen, platelets, or fresh
defined by the ECASS I investigators.8 frozen plasma, is unknown, and further
The four subtypes are: (1) hemorrhagic studies are warranted. Surgical inter-
infarction 1, with scattered heteroge- vention can be considered in select
neous petechiae along the margins of patients when the rtPA has been ade-
the infarct; (2) hemorrhagic infarction quately reversed. Case 5-1 provides an
Subtype CT Findings
Hemorrhagic 1 Heterogeneous petechiae along the infarct margins
infarction 2 More confluent heterogeneous petechiae within
the infarct
Parenchymal 1 Homogeneous hematoma involving G30% of the infarct
hematoma volume; mild space-occupying effect
2 Homogeneous hematoma involving 930% of the infarct
volume; significant space-occupying effect
CT = computed tomography.
Case 5-1
A 77-year-old man with hypertension, type 2 diabetes mellitus, and obesity
presented to the emergency department at 10:38 AM with acute onset
of left-sided weakness that occurred at 9:45 AM. Examination revealed
a mild left hemiparesis with severe left-sided sensory loss and neglect, with
a National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score of 9. His wife
reported he was taking a daily aspirin 81 mg and had no history of
anticoagulant use. Head CT showed no evidence of intracranial hemorrhage
or early ischemic changes. His presenting blood pressure was 210/98 mm Hg,
which was controlled and maintained below 180/105 mm Hg with a nicardipine
infusion. IV recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rtPA) was administered
at 11:17 AM. CT angiogram showed occlusion of a distal left M2 branch of
the middle cerebral artery and thrombi in several distal M3 branches, but no
proximal large vessel occlusion was identified that would be amenable to
thrombectomy. After returning from the CT angiogram, the patient began
grimacing and held his head with his right hand. At 11:42 AM , his nurse then
noted that his left facial droop had worsened and the patient seemed more
confused and lethargic. Upon reexamination, he was noted to have a dense
left hemiplegia with right gaze deviation. He was no longer arousable to vocal
stimulus, and his repeat NIHSS score was 20. The IV rtPA infusion was
stopped and a repeat head CT was performed, which demonstrated a 32 mL
intraparenchymal hematoma in the right frontoparietal lobe with mass
effect and midline shift. A complete blood cell count, prothrombin time,
international normalized ratio (INR), activated partial thromboplastin
time, fibrinogen, D-dimer, and type and screen were drawn. The
patient was intubated, cryoprecipitate was started, and neurosurgery
was called.
Comment. In this case, the patient had neurologic deterioration
secondary to suspected intracranial hemorrhage, and the IV rtPA was
stopped immediately. Airway, breathing, and circulation must be continuously
addressed as a patient’s clinical decline can be rapid. Cryoprecipitate is
recommended to restore decreased fibrinogen levels, but no study has been
conducted to establish the optimal way to treat post-rtPA hemorrhage;
further studies are warranted.
Case 5-2
A 62-year-old man with no known medical history was teaching a class when he suddenly became dizzy
and collapsed without loss of consciousness. On arrival to the emergency department, his neurologic
examination revealed right hemiplegia, left gaze deviation, and mutism. His National Institutes
of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score was 26. Head CT within 40 minutes of symptom onset showed
a hyperdense left middle cerebral artery sign and early ischemic changes in the left hemisphere. He was
given IV recombinant tissue plasminogen activator and transferred to a certified stroke center for
potential thrombectomy. Due to local weather conditions, his transfer was delayed, and a repeat head
CT 4 hours after symptom onset demonstrated early ischemic changes in a larger area of the left
hemisphere. Angiography revealed a distal left M1 occlusion. Postthrombectomy, the M1 was recanalized,
but there were multiple M2 branch occlusions. Repeat head CT the following day showed continued
evolution of the infarct without significant midline shift (Figure 5-2A). His wife was updated with the
results, and the possibility of decompressive craniectomy was discussed in detail. The following
morning, the patient was difficult to arouse, and the repeat head CT demonstrated 7 mm of midline
shift with increasing vasogenic edema (Figure 5-2B). He was taken for emergent decompressive
craniectomy. The postoperative head CT showed improvement of the midline shift (Figure 5-2C).
FIGURE 5-2 Imaging of the patient in Case 5-2. A, Head CT 1 day after stroke shows continued evolution of the infarct
without significant midline shift. B, Repeat head CT the following day shows 7 mm of midline shift with increasing
vasogenic edema. C, Head CT following decompressive craniectomy shows improvement of midline shift.
Comment. In this case, the patient had a proximal large vessel occlusion, large infarct volume
greater than one-third of the left middle cerebral artery territory, and an NIHSS score greater than
20. The presence of these factors indicated the possibility of progression toward malignant edema,
and early discussions with his wife helped to define the goals of care before the patient decompensated
the following day.
KEY POINT
h Contraindications to VTE [venous thromboembolism] After leg edema. Aspirin is also reasonable for
unfractionated heparin Acute Ischemic Stroke With LMWH DVT prophylaxis in patients who cannot
or low-molecular-weight [low-molecular-weight heparin] receive heparin or intermittent pneu-
heparin for deep venous Enoxaparin (PREVAIL) study demon- matic compression.9
thrombosis prophylaxis strated a significantly lower rate of Therapeutic anticoagulation is
or therapy for venous thromboembolism without a recommended for patients who are
symptomatic deep significant increase in major hemor- found to have a symptomatic proximal
venous thrombosis or DVT, since pulmonary embolism can
rhagic events in patients treated with
pulmonary embolism occur in 50% of patients if untreated.
include intracranial
40 mg/d enoxaparin versus 5000 IU
unfractionated heparin 2 times a day.34 Untreated acute pulmonary embolism
hemorrhage, recent
A meta-analysis of three randomized has a 30% mortality rate, with most
thrombolytic therapy,
and active extracranial trials demonstrated that low-molecular- deaths occurring within the first few
hemorrhage. Alternatives weight heparin was superior to hours after the initial event due to
include intermittent unfractionated heparin for venous recurrent pulmonary embolism. Risks
pneumatic compression thromboembolism prevention without associated with anticoagulation in-
or aspirin for prophylaxis
a significant difference for rates of in- clude hemorrhagic transformation of
and inferior vena cava ischemic stroke, hematoma expan-
tracranial hemorrhage, overall hemor-
filter or surgical sion or recurrent bleeding in patients
embolectomy for
rhage, or mortality.35
with intracranial hemorrhage, or
symptomatic deep In patients receiving IV rtPA, the
extracranial hemorrhage. These risks
venous thrombosis or initiation of heparin prophylaxis should
must be carefully weighed against
pulmonary embolism. be delayed until 24 hours after throm-
the benefits when considering ther-
bolytic therapy, and the therapy is rec-
apeutic anticoagulation.
ommended to be continued during the In patients who are not suitable
hospitalization or until the patient re- candidates for anticoagulation, inferior
gains mobility.9 vena cava filter placement is an option.
For patients presenting with an in- For large or severe acute pulmonary
tracerebral hemorrhage, intermittent embolism in patients unable to receive
pneumatic compression devices should anticoagulation, catheter or surgical
be used on the day of admission. Once embolectomy is also a treatment op-
the cessation of bleeding is confirmed, tion. For symptomatic distal DVTs,
a low dose of low-molecular-weight anticoagulation can be considered in
heparin or unfractionated heparin can patients who are felt to be at high risk
be considered for patients with re- for proximal extension of the thrombus.
stricted mobility after 1 to 4 days fol- If anticoagulation is not pursued, serial
lowing the event.36 Table 5-2 provides noninvasive vascular imaging can be
examples of DVT prophylaxis in differ- performed to assess for proximal ex-
ent clinical scenarios. tension of the DVT in the first 2 weeks.
For patients with contraindications
for heparin use, intermittent pneumatic Dysphagia and Nutritional
compression devices can be used. The Considerations
use of intermittent pneumatic com- Many patients cannot receive fluids or
pression has been demonstrated to nutrition orally because of dysphagia
be effective in DVT prevention in or impaired mental status. Dysphagia
immobilized patients with stroke. 31 is commonly encountered following
Contraindications to intermittent pneu- stroke, and the risk is increased in
matic compression include peripheral patients who are male; are older than
vascular disease causing leg ischemia, 70 years of age; have had severe
leg ulcerations, dermatitis, and severe stroke; or have impaired pharyngeal
f
through a nasogastric
intermittent pneumatic
tube is associated with
compression devices on
Stroke with IV 1 day after admission until chemical improved survival.
recombinant tissue thrombolytic therapy prophylaxis can be started, then:
plasminogen activator
Unfractionated heparin
5000 IU every 8Y12 hours
OR low-molecular-weight
heparin
Intracranial 1 to 4 days after
hemorrhage bleeding cessation Enoxaparin 40 mg/d SC
is demonstrated
Dalteparin 5000 units/d SC
Fondaparinux 2.5 mg/d SC
Contraindication On admission Mechanical prophylaxis with
to anticoagulation intermittent pneumatic
compression devices and
chemical prophylaxis with
aspirin 325 mg/d orally
IV = intravenous; SC = subcutaneous.
KEY POINTS
h Up to 70% of patients Infection become more apparent following the
with stroke will have a Fever after a stroke should prompt acute hospitalization.
fall, thus all patients evaluation for common sources, in-
with stroke should have cluding pneumonia and urinary tract Falls
a formal fall prevention infection. Prophylactic antibiotic use is All patients with stroke should be
program. not recommended. The most common provided with a formal fall prevention
h Fractures in patients cause of fever in the first 48 hours program during hospitalization.40 A
who are poststroke after acute stroke is pneumonia, which fall prevention program includes iden-
often occur on the is attributed to aspiration in 60% of tifying the patient at high risk for falls,
paretic side and are cases.3 In addition to aspiration, im- counseling the patient and family
secondary to mobility and atelectasis can lead to about the risk, encouraging the pa-
accidental falls. development of pneumonia. Early tient and family to seek assistance if
mobilization and good pulmonary needed, preventing delirium, minimiz-
care should be encouraged in the ing the use of mechanical restraints,
hospital to prevent pneumonia. For using bed and chair alarms, using
patients who are intubated, preven- ceiling lifts to facilitate transfers, and
tive measures include ventilation in effectively communicating the pa-
a semirecumbent position, appro- tient’s care plan with the team with
priate airway positioning, suctioning shift changes. Patients at high risk for
of secretions, and daily assessments falls include those with cognitive im-
for potential extubation. Nausea pairment, neglect, anosognosia, and
should be addressed and treated to polypharmacy. In the acute setting,
prevent vomiting. most falls are observed during the day
Urinary tract infections occur in in the patient’s room or restroom, often
11% to 15% of patients with stroke, associated with transfers or attempts
and are often seen during the first at activities without supervision. Once
5 days of the hospitalization, but they the patient returns to the community,
can occur up to 3 months poststroke. the rate of falls associated with trans-
Urinary tract infection is an indepen- fers decreases, and subsequent falls
dent predictor of worse outcomes and are most commonly associated with
prolonged hospitalizations. 1,39 In- ambulation.41 A retrospective study
dwelling catheters should be avoided showed that 5% of patients with stroke
to reduce the risk of catheter-associated fell during their acute hospitalization,
urinary tract infection. However, they and these falls were associated with
may be required in certain circum- greater stroke severity and history of
stances, such as in cases of acute uri- anxiety.42 In the first 6 months after
nary retention or obstruction or when hospitalization, up to 70% of patients
strict monitoring of urinary output is with stroke will have a fall.43
needed in patients who are critically Most fractures in patients who are
ill. The catheter should be removed as poststroke occur on the paretic side
soon as possible, and intermittent and are secondary to accidental falls.
catheterization can be implemented Of all poststroke fractures, hip frac-
to decrease infection risk. tures represent 45% and are 2 to
4 times more common in the stroke
LATE COMPLICATIONS community when compared with the
Many late complications of stroke age-matched population.44 Patients
can be seen in the acute setting, but who ambulate early after stroke ap-
issues such as falls, seizures, sleep- pear to lose bone mineral density on
disordered breathing, and depression the paretic side only, as opposed to
102 ContinuumJournal.com February 2017
Case 5-3
A 74-year-old woman presented to clinic for follow-up 1 month after a left
middle cerebral artery territory stroke. She had a residual moderate mixed
aphasia and right hemiparesis but was able to ambulate with a walker. During
her hospitalization, she was identified to be at risk for obstructive sleep
apnea; this was confirmed on polysomnography in the sleep clinic. Continuous
positive airway pressure therapy had been initiated, and she noticed
significantly improved sleep and a moderate improvement of her daytime
sleepiness. However, she continued to have difficulty getting out of bed in
the mornings and struggled with persistent daytime fatigue since her
Continued on page 106
absence of depression and can be dif- pression after stroke. Until then, pa-
ficult to treat. However, fatigue asso- tients should be screened for sleep
ciated with depression can potentially apnea and depression in both the hos-
be alleviated when the depression is pital and outpatient settings, as these
treated73; thus, a standard approach to can have implications for their func-
treating depression with nonpharma- tional outcomes. Patients should also
cologic and pharmacologic treatment be regularly assessed for fall risk
options should be offered to patients beginning with their initial hospitaliza-
with poststroke depression. Screening tion and continuing in the clinic set-
tools such as the Center of Epidemio- ting during follow-up visits.
logical Studies-Depression Scale (CES-
D), Hamilton Depression Rating Scale REFERENCES
(HDRS), and Patient Health Question- 1. Ingeman A, Andersen G, Hundborg HH,
naire (PHQ-9) have demonstrated high et al. In-hospital medical complications,
length of stay, and mortality among
sensitivity for detecting depression.74 A stroke unit patients. Stroke 2011;
2016 scientific statement by the American 42(11):3214Y3218. doi:10.1161/
Heart Association/American Stroke STROKEAHA.110.610881.
Association acknowledged that fur- 2. Silver FL, Norris JW, Lewis AJ, Hachinski VC.
ther research is needed to determine Early mortality following stroke: a prospective
review. Stroke 1984;15(3):492Y496.
whether screening and subsequent doi:10.1161/01.STR.15.3.492.
treatment improve outcomes in the
3. Johnston KC, Li JY, Lyden PD, et al.
general stroke population.75 Medical and neurological complications
of ischemic stroke: experience from
CONCLUSION the RANTTAS trial. RANTTAS
Investigators. Stroke 1998;29(2):447Y453.
A heightened awareness of commonly
doi:10.1161/01.STR.29.2.447.
encountered early and late medical
4. Hill MD, Lye T, Moss H, et al.
complications of stroke along with
Hemi-orolingual angioedema and
knowledge of how to prevent and ACE inhibition after alteplase treatment
manage them can help to improve of stroke. Neurology 2003;60(9):
patient outcomes, decrease the length 1525Y1527. doi:10.1212/01.WNL.
0000058840.66596.1A.
of hospital stays and readmission
rates, and decrease overall health care 5. Fugate JE, Kalimullah EA, Wijdicks EF.
Angioedema after tPA: what
costs. Further studies are needed to
neurointensivists should know. Neurocrit
identify patients at risk for seizures, Care 2012;16(3):440Y443. doi:10.1007/
sleep-disordered breathing, and de- s12028-012-9678-0.
14. Hacke W, Schwab S, Horn M. “Malignant” 24. Manno EM, Nichols DA, Fulgham JR,
middle cerebral artery territory infarction: Wijdicks EF. Computed tomographic
clinical course and prognostic signs. Arch determinants of neurologic deterioration
Neurol 1996;53(4):309Y315. doi:10.1001/ in patients with large middle cerebral
archneur.1996.00550040037012. artery infarctions. Mayo Clin Proc
2003;78(2):156Y160. doi:10.4065/78.2.156.
15. Qureshi AI, Suarez JI, Yahia AM, et al.
Timing of neurologic deterioration in 25. Pullicino PM, Alexandrov AV, Shelton JA,
massive middle cerebral artery infarction: et al. Mass effect and death from
a multicenter review. Crit Care Med severe acute stroke. Neurology
2003;31(1):272Y277. doi:10.1097/ 1997;49(4):1090Y1095. doi:10.1212/
01.CCM.0000044503.35843.BD. WNL.49.4.1090.
26. Mlynash M, Lansberg MG, De Silva DA, et al. spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage: a
Refining the definition of the malignant guideline for healthcare professionals from
profile: insights from the DEFUSE-EPITHET the American Heart Association/American
pooled data set. Stroke 2011;42(5):1270Y1275. Stroke Association. Stroke 2015;46(7):2032Y2060.
doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.110.601609. doi:10.1161/STR.0000000000000069.
27. Vahedi K, Hofmeijer J, Jeuttler E, et al. Early 37. Mann G, Hankey GJ. Initial clinical and
decompressive surgery in malignant infarction demographic predictors of swallowing
of the middle cerebral artery: a polled analysis impairment following acute stroke.
of three randomised controlled trials. Lancet Dysphagia 2001;16(3):208Y215. doi:10.1007/
Neurol 2007;6(3):215Y222. doi:10.1016/ s00455-001-0069-5.
S1474-4422(07)70036-4.
38. Hinchey JA, Shephard T, Furie K, et al.
28. Jüttler E, Unterberg A, Woitzik J, et al. Formal dysphagia screening protocols
Hemicraniectomy in older patients with prevent pneumonia. Stroke
extensive middle-cerebral-artery stroke. 2005;36(9):1972Y1976. doi:0.1161/
N Engl J Med 2014;370(12):1091Y1100. 01.STR.0000177529.86868.8d.
doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1311367.
39. Langhorne P, Stott DJ, Robertson L, et al.
29. Pongmoragot J, Rabinstein AA, Nilanont Y, Medical complications after stroke: a
et al Pulmonary embolism in ischemic multicenter study. Stroke 2000;31(6):
stroke: clinical presentation, risk factors, and 1223Y1229. doi:10.1161/01.STR.31.6.1223.
outcome. J Am Heart Assoc 2013;2(6):e000372.
40. Winstein CJ, Stein J, Arena R, et al.
doi:10.1161/JAHA.113.000372.
Guidelines for adult stroke rehabilitation
30. Kelly J, Rudd A, Lewis R, Hunt BJ. Venous and recovery: a guideline for healthcare
thromboembolism after acute stroke. professionals from the American Heart
Stroke 2001;32(1):262Y267. doi:10.1161/ Association/American Stroke Association.
01.STR.32.1.262. Stroke 2016;47(6):e98Ye169. doi:10.1161/
STR.0000000000000098.
31. Dennis M, Mordi N, Graham C, et al.
The timing, extent, progression and 41. Weerdesteyn V, de Niet M, van Duijnhoven
regression of deep vein thrombosis in HJ, Geurts AC. Falls in individuals with
immobile stroke patients: observational stroke. J Rehabil Res Dev 2008;45(8):
data from the CLOTS multicenter randomized 1195Y1214. doi:10.1682/JRRD.2007.09.0145.
trials. J Thromb Haemost 2011;9(11): 42. Schmid AA, Wells CK, Concato J, et al.
2193Y2200. doi:10.1111/j.1538-7836. Prevalence, predictors, and outcomes of
2011.04486.x. poststroke falls in acute hospital
32. Kappelle LJ. Preventing deep vein thrombosis setting. J Rehabil Res Dev
after stroke: strategies and recommendations. 2010;47(6):553Y562. doi:10.1682/
Curr Treat Options Neurol 2011;13(6):629Y635. JRRD.2009.08.0133.
doi:10.1007/s11940-011-0147-4. 43. Batchelor F, Hill K, Mackintosh S, Said C.
33. Kamphuisen PW, Agnelli G. What is the What works in falls prevention after stroke?:
optimal pharmacological prophylaxis for a systematic review and meta-analysis.
the prevention of deep-vein thrombosis Stroke 2010;41(8):1715Y1722. doi:10.1161/
and pulmonary embolism in patients with STROKEAHA.109.570390.
acute ischemic stroke? Thromb Res 44. Ramnemark A, Nyberg L, Borssén B, et al.
2007;119(3):265Y274. doi:10.1016/ Fractures after stroke. Osteoporos Int 1998;
j.thromres.2006.03.010. 8(1):92Y95. doi:10.1007/s001980050053.
34. Muir KW. The PREVAIL trial and 45. Myint PK, Poole KE, Warburton EA. Hip
low-molecular-weight heparin for prevention fractures after stroke and their prevention.
of venous thromboembolism. Stroke QJM 2007;100(9):539Y545. doi:10.1093/
2008;39(7):2174Y2176. doi:10.1161/ qjmed/hcm067.
STROKEAHA.107.509588.
46. Beaupre GS, Lew HL. Bone-density changes
35. Shorr AF, Jackson WL, Sherner JH, Moores LK. after stroke. Am J Phys Med Rehabil
Differences between low-molecular-weight 2006;85(5):464Y472. doi:10.1097/
and unfractionated heparin for venous 01.phm.0000214275.69286.7a.
thromboembolism prevention following
ischemic stroke: a metaanalysis. 47. Jørgensen L, Jacobsen BK, Wilsgaard T,
Magnus JH. Walking after stroke: does
Chest 2008;133(1):149Y155. doi:10.1378/
it matter? Changes in bone mineral density
chest.07-1826.
within the first 12 months after stroke. A
36. Hemphill JC 3rd, Greenberg SM, Anderson CS, longitudinal study. Osteoporos Int 2000;
et al. Guidelines for the management of 11(5):381Y387. doi:10.1007/s001980070103.
54. Graham NS, Crichton S, Koutroumanidis M, 64. Hackett ML, Pickles K. Part I: frequency of
et al. Incidence and associations of depression after stroke: an updated
poststroke epilepsy: the prospective systematic review and meta-analysis of
South London Stroke Register. Stroke observational studies. Int J Stroke
2013;44(3):605Y611. doi:10.1161/ 2014;9(8):1017Y1025. doi:10.1111/ijs.12357.
STROKEAHA.111.000220. 65. Ayerbe L, Ayis S, Crichton S, et al. The
55. Johnson KG, Johnson DC. Frequency of natural history of depression up to 15 years
sleep apnea in stroke and TIA patients: a after stroke: the South London Stroke
meta-analysis. J Clin Sleep Med 2010; Register. Stroke 2013;44(4):1105Y1110.
6(2):131Y137. doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.111.679340.
56. Alexandrov AV, Nguyen HT, Rubiera M, 66. Kessler RC, Chiu WT, Demler O, et al.
et al. Prevalence and risk factors Prevalence, severity, and comorbidity of
associated with reversed Robin Hood 12-month DSM-IV disorders in the
syndrome in acute ischemic stroke. Stroke National Comorbidity Survey Replication.
2009;40(8):2738Y2742. doi:10.1161/ Arch Gen Psychiatry 2005;62(6):617Y627.
STROKEAHA.109.547950. doi:10.1001/archpsyc.62.6.617.
57. Good DC, Henkle JQ, Gelber D, et al. 67. Carson AJ, MacHale S, Allen K, et al.
Sleep-disordered breathing and poor Depression after stroke and lesion location:
functional outcome after stroke. Stroke a systematic review. Lancet 2000;
1996;27(2):252Y259. doi:10.1161/ 356(9224):122Y126.
01.STR.27.2.252.
68. Herrmann N, Black SE, Lawrence J, et al.
58. Bassetti CL, Milanova M, Gugger M. The Sunnybrook Stroke Study: a prospective
Sleep-disordered breathing and acute study of depressive symptoms and functional
ischemic stroke: diagnosis, risk factors, outcome. Stroke 1998;29(3):618Y624.
treatment, evolution, and long-term doi:10.1161/01.STR.29.3.618.
clinical outcome. Stroke 2006;37(4):
69. Chemerinski E, Robinson RG, Kosier JT.
967Y972. doi:10.1161/01.STR.0000208215.
Improved recovery in activities of daily living
49243.c3.
associated with remission of poststroke
59. Martı́nez-Garcı́a MA, Campos-Rodrı́guez F, depression. Stroke 2001;32(1):113Y117.
Soler-Cataluña JJ, et al. Increased incidence doi:0.1161/01.STR.32.1.113.
70. Chollet F, Tardy J, Albucher JF, et al. Fluoxetine Cerebrovasc Dis 2001;12(2):75Y81. doi:10.
for motor recovery after acute ischaemic stroke 1159/000047685.
(FLAME): A randomised placebo-controlled
trial. Lancet Neurol 2011;10(2):123Y130. doi: 74. Meader N, Moe-Byrne T, Llewellyn A,
10.1016/S1474-4422(10)70314-8. Mitchell AJ. Screening for poststroke
depression: a meta-analysis of diagnostic
71. Schmid AA, Kroenke K, Hendrie HC, et al. validity studies. J Neurol Neurosurg
Poststroke depression and treatment effects Psychiatry 2014;85(2):198Y206.
on functional outcomes. Neurology doi:10.1136/jnnp-2012-304194.
2011;76(11):1000Y1005. doi:10.1212/
WNL.0b013e318210435e. 75. Towfighi A, Ovbiagele B, El
Husseini N, et al. Poststroke depression:
72. Chollet F, Acket B, Raposo N, et al. Use of
a scientific statement for healthcare
antidepressant medications to improve outcomes
professionals from the American Heart
after stroke. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep 2013;
Association/American Stroke Association.
13(1):318. doi:10.1007/s11910-012-0318-z.
[published online ahead of print
73. Staub F, Bogousslavsky J. Fatigue after December 8, 2016]. Stroke.
stroke: a major but neglected issue. doi:10.1161/STR.0000000000000113.
Cardioembolic Stroke
Address correspondence to
Dr Cumara B. O’Carroll, Mayo
Clinic Arizona, 13400 E Shea
Blvd, Scottsdale, AZ 85259,
Cumara B. O’Carroll, MD, MPH; Kevin M. Barrett, MD, MSc [email protected].
Relationship Disclosure:
Dr O’Carroll reports no
disclosure. Dr Barrett serves
ABSTRACT on the editorial board of
Purpose of Review: Cardioembolic stroke is common and disproportionately more Neurology, has received
research/grant support from
disabling than nonembolic mechanisms of stroke. Its incidence is expected to rise the National Institute of
because of the age-related incidence of atrial fibrillation and an aging population. Neurological Disorders and
This article summarizes the different causes of cardioembolism and outlines current Stroke for serving on the
executive committees of
management guidelines. the CREST-2 and SHINE
Recent Findings: Since cardioembolic stroke is not a single disease entity, its diagnosis clinical trials, and receives
requires initial clinical suspicion and a comprehensive evaluation, including ECG, publishing royalties from
Wiley Blackwell.
echocardiography, brain imaging, and cardiac monitoring. Atrial fibrillation is the most Unlabeled Use of
common cause of cardioembolic stroke, and anticoagulation is usually recommended. Products/Investigational
This article reviews risk stratification models to assist in the decision-making process Use Disclosure:
Drs O’Carroll and Barrett
and highlights the increased use of novel oral anticoagulants for stroke prevention in report no disclosure.
atrial fibrillation. New data support the importance of prolonged cardiac monitoring * 2017 American Academy
for diagnosing occult atrial fibrillation. Current data on other mechanisms of of Neurology.
cardioembolic stroke, such as prosthetic heart valves and aortic arch atherosclerosis,
are also presented, and the available evidence regarding patent foramen ovale closure
in cryptogenic stroke is summarized.
Summary: Cardioembolism is an important cause of ischemic stroke, with diverse
underlying mechanisms requiring a tailored approach to diagnosis, management,
and prevention.
KEY POINTS
h Cardioembolism DIAGNOSTIC APPROACH TO risk factors. Transthoracic echocardi-
accounts for 20% to 30% CARDIOEMBOLIC STROKE ography (TTE) is essential to cardio-
of all ischemic strokes. The initial clinical evaluation for po- embolic stroke evaluation as it is a
tential cardioembolic stroke should noninvasive way to assess heart struc-
h Multiple cortical infarcts
in different vascular be systematic and thorough, given all ture and function, and, when used in
distributions in an the possible underlying mechanisms combination with an injection of agi-
individual patient and evidence-based recommendations tated saline (bubble study), it allows
should raise suspicion dependent on these mechanisms. Per- for detection of right-to-left shunting
for a proximal source forming a detailed history and physical (eg, patent foramen ovale or atrial septal
of embolus. examination is crucial, as is obtaining defect). While transesophageal echo-
h Transesophageal neuroimaging, ECG, laboratory stud- cardiography (TEE) involves greater
echocardiography is ies, and echocardiography (Table 6-1). procedural risk than TTE, it has been
superior to transthoracic When neuroimaging is performed in shown to be superior for evaluating the
echocardiography in the acute setting, it is usually a noncon- aortic arch, the left atrial appendage, the
assessing the anatomy trast head CT as this is widely available aortic valve, and the atrial septum.11Y13
of the ascending and fast, excludes intracerebral hemor- If TTE does not identify a cardiac source
aorta/aortic arch; rhage (ICH), and assists in determining of embolism and the index of suspi-
evaluating for the
eligibility for thrombolysis.8 MRI can be cion for a proximal source of embo-
presence of thrombus
useful in establishing the presence of lism remains high, then TEE should
in the left atrium; and
both clinically evident and subclinical be performed.14,15
detecting and measuring
an atrial septal defect, strokes, delineating their vascular dis-
tributions, as well as chronic infarcts. It ATRIAL FIBRILLATION
atrial septal aneurysm, or
patent foramen ovale. is more sensitive in detecting smaller AF is the most common significant car-
areas of ischemia, especially in the diac arrhythmia and is a major risk
h Atrial fibrillation is
associated with left posterior fossa, when compared to CT. factor for ischemic stroke, associated
atrial enlargement, The patterns of cardioembolic stroke with a fivefold increase in risk.16 Its
resulting in stasis of seen on neuroimaging are typically incidence increases with age, and it is
blood and increased cortical or cortical-subcortical wedge- estimated to affect between 2.7 and
propensity for clot shaped areas of ischemia, with involve- 6.1 million Americans, with an esti-
formation, with ment of multiple vascular territories, or mated 16 million people affected by
subsequent embolization scattered infarcts.2 Vessel imaging (ca- the year 2050.17Y20 Given the aging
to the brain. rotid ultrasound, CT angiography, or US population, this will have a sub-
MR angiography [MRA]) may serve to stantial impact not only on individuals
discover an alternate mechanism of but on society as a whole as strokes
stroke, such as artery-to-artery embo- from AF tend to be more severe, re-
lism. A baseline ECG should be ob- sulting in greater disability and mor-
tained in patients with new stroke, as tality. Preventing stroke in patients with
well as telemetry when hospitalized, but AF has significant implications on
many patients will require prolonged lowering health care costs attributed
monitoring in the form of Holter or to cardioembolism.
event monitoring to detect occult AF.9,10 AF leads to ineffective contraction
Basic laboratory studies include com- of the atria and is associated with left
plete blood cell count, prothrombin atrial enlargement. This results in stasis
time, activated thromboplastin time, of blood and increased propensity for
thyroid function tests, and troponin clot formation within the left atrium
level.8 Young patients should undergo and atrial appendage, with subsequent
a hypercoagulable workup, especially if embolization to the brain. Both valvu-
they have a family history suggestive lar and nonvalvular AF exist. Valvular
of thrombophilia or have no vascular AF occurs in the setting of a prosthetic
112 ContinuumJournal.com February 2017
b Physical Examination
Vital signs
Neurologic examination
Cardiac examination
Murmurs, arrhythmias, cardiac enlargement
Lung auscultation
Neck examination
Bruits
Peripheral vascular examination
Bruits, peripheral edema, decreased or absent pulses, assessment of
jugular venous pressure
Ophthalmologic examination
Retinal changes (hypertensive, cholesterol crystals, venous-stasis retinopathy);
inflammatory, infectious, and genetic diseases; retinocerebral arteriopathies
Skin examination
Ischemic skin changes, petechiae, angiokeratomas (Fabry disease)
b Imaging Studies
CT/MRI brain
CT: Widely available, fast, excludes intracerebral hemorrhage, assists in
determining eligibility for thrombolysis.
MRI: Useful for clinically evident and subclinical strokes, vascular distributions,
chronic infarcts; more sensitive for detecting ischemia in the posterior fossa.
Vascular imaging
Doppler ultrasound, CTA, MRA
Chest x-ray
b Cardiac Evaluation
Serial ECG
Cardiac telemetry
Extended cardiac monitoring
Many patients require Holter or event monitoring to detect occult atrial fibrillation
Transthoracic echocardiography (TTE)
Noninvasive, evaluates heart structure and function, good for left
ventricular thrombus
Transesophageal echocardiography (TEE)
Superior for evaluating the aortic arch, the left atrial appendage, the
aortic valve, and the atrial septum, but more invasive than TTE
Continued on page 114
KEY POINTS
h Paroxysmal atrial TABLE 6-1 Diagnostic Approach to Suspected Cardioembolic Stroke
fibrillation seems to Continued from page 113
present a similar
risk of stroke as b Laboratory Studies
persistent or permanent
Complete blood cell count
atrial fibrillation.
h For both the CHADS2 Blood cultures
and CHA2DS2VASc Infective endocarditis
scores, a previous
Erythrocyte sedimentation rate, C-reactive protein
history of stroke or
transient ischemic Elevated in infection, vasculitis, malignancy
attack usually confers Prothrombin time, partial thromboplastin time, international normalized ratio
a high enough
annual risk to Detect coagulopathies
warrant anticoagulation. Thyroid function tests
Lipid profile
Hypercoagulable panel
Young patients with family history suggestive of thrombophilia and no
vascular risk factors
CT = computed tomography; CTA = computed tomography angiography; ECG = electrocardiogram;
MRA = magnetic resonance angiography; MRI = magnetic resonance imaging.
valve or rheumatic mitral valve steno- cation tools have been developed to
sis, and nonvalvular AF occurs without estimate whether the embolic risk in
an underlying structural valve defect. an individual patient exceeds the risk
Similarly, different types of AF exist of major bleeding, as illustrated in
(paroxysmal, persistent, permanent),21 Case 6-1. One of the most commonly
but even transient episodes of AF re- used tools is the CHADS2 (congestive
sult in thrombus formation; thus, the heart failure, hypertension, age 75 years
approach to anticoagulation should be or older, diabetes mellitus, and pre-
similar in patients with paroxysmal AF vious stroke/transient ischemic at-
and those with persistent/permanent AF. tack [TIA]) 22,23 risk stratification
scheme (Table 6-224), although in
Risk Stratification in recent years it has been expanded to
Atrial Fibrillation the CHA2DS2VASc (congestive heart
The annual risk of stroke in patients failure, hypertension, age 75 years or
with AF not on thromboprophylaxis is older, diabetes mellitus, stroke, vascular
approximately 5%.18 This risk is highly disease, age 65 to 74 years, sex category
dependent on the other risk factors a [female sex]) score (Table 6-3).23,25
specific patient may have and increases These risk stratification scores incorpo-
as the number of risk factors increases. rate individual clinical factors and
One of the most important decisions provide clinicians with an estimate of
that must be made for patients with annual stroke risk. For both of these
AF is whether or not anticoagulation scoring systems, a previous history of
is indicated to prevent stroke. Since stroke or TIA usually confers a high
anticoagulation itself is associated enough annual risk to warrant anti-
with the risk of bleeding, risk stratifi- coagulation. The CHA2DS2VASc score
has a broader score range and includes serve as a guide for clinical decision
more risk factors than CHADS2 and making and not as the sole reason to
thus is thought to more accurately withhold anticoagulation. A HAS-BLED
estimate stroke risk. score of 3 or higher suggests that a
While several scales are available patient is at high risk for bleeding and
to estimate annual bleeding risk in caution is warranted, with close mon-
patients who are anticoagulated, the itoring for adverse events, tight INR
HAS-BLED (hypertension, abnormal control, and possibly a lower dose
liver or renal function, history of of anticoagulant. 23
stroke or bleeding, labile international
normalized ratios [INRs], elderly, use Antithrombotic Therapy
of drugs that promote bleeding or for Stroke Prevention in
alcohol use) score is the most widely Atrial Fibrillation
used (Table 6-426,27).23,26,28 This score The choice of antithrombotic ther-
assists with quantifying risk of hem- apy for stroke prevention in patients
orrhage and highlights modifiable risk with AF should be individualized. Anti-
factors (ie, alcohol intake, concomitant thrombotic therapy as a category in-
use of antiplatelet drugs or nonsteroidal cludes both antiplatelet agents and
anti-inflammatory drugs), but it should anticoagulants.
KEY POINT
h Warfarin is superior TABLE 6-2 CHADS2 Score to Estimate Stroke Risk in Patients With
to aspirin in preventing Atrial Fibrillationa,b,c
stroke for high-risk
patients with atrial Adjusted Stroke Rate
fibrillation, and thus CHADS2 Score (% per Year) Recommendation
anticoagulation is 0 1.9 No antithrombotic
preferred over
antiplatelet agents 1 2.8 Antiplatelet or anticoagulation
for secondary stroke 2 4.0 Anticoagulation
prevention in
3 5.9 Anticoagulation
these patients.
4 8.5 Anticoagulation
5 12.5 Anticoagulation
6 18.2 Anticoagulation
a
Data from Gage BF, et al, JAMA,22 jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/article-abstract/193912 and
January CT, et al, J Am Coll Cardiol.23 content.onlinejacc.org/article.aspx?articleid=1854231.
b
Modified with permission from Kim A, Continuum (Minneap Minn).24 B 2014 American Academy
of Neurology. journals.lww.com/continuum/Fulltext/2014/04000/Evaluation_and_Prevention_
of_Cardioembolic_Stroke.10.aspx.
c
CHADS2
Congestive heart failure 1 point
Hypertension 1 point
Age Q 75 years 1 point
Diabetes mellitus 1 point
Stroke/transient ischemic attack/thromboembolism 2 points
Maximum score 6 points
per year, PG.001), but this was neutral- Even with its proven efficacy in
ized by a higher rate of major bleeding stroke prevention, limitations are asso-
(2.0% versus 1.3% annual risk; relative ciated with warfarin therapy (Table 6-5).
risk 1.57; PG.001). Additionally, a non- In addition to an increased risk of bleed-
significant increase in the rate of ing, warfarin has a narrow therapeutic
hemorrhagic stroke was seen in the window (INR 2 to 3), requiring fre-
clopidogrel/aspirin group.31 The American quent blood monitoring (weekly ini-
Heart Association/American Stroke As- tially, then monthly).32 As the INR
sociation guidelines state that it “might drops below 2, the risk of stroke rises
be reasonable” to consider adding rapidly. In clinical practice as well as
clopidogrel to aspirin therapy in patients in the most reputable trials, time in
with AF and previous stroke who are the therapeutic range for patients on
unable to take oral anticoagulants.30 Many warfarin is estimated at 55% to 66%.23
patients with AF require medications for Warfarin interacts with other medica-
both rate and rhythm control, but this tions and is affected by fluctuations in
does not preclude the need for antithrom- diet, which poses a challenge for both
botic therapy for stroke prevention. clinicians and patients.
KEY POINTS
h All of the novel oral factor Xa inhibitors (rivaroxaban, api-
anticoagulants were TABLE 6-4 HAS-BLED Score to xaban, and edoxaban)33Y37 and one di-
Estimate the Risk of rect thrombin inhibitor (dabigatran)38,39
found to be noninferior Hemorrhagea,b
to warfarin, with dabi- have been approved by the US Food
gatran (high dose) and and Drug Administration (FDA) for pre-
HAS-BLED Bleeds per
apixaban meeting Score 100 Patient-yearsc vention of stroke in nonvalvular AF
superiority end points. (Table 6-6). The first to be approved
Apixaban also resulted 0 1.13
was dabigatran (Randomized Evaluation
in lower mortality and 1 1.02 of Long-Term Anticoagulant Therapy
less major bleeding. With Dabigatran Etexilate [RE-LY]38),
2 1.88
h Potential benefits of followed by rivaroxaban (Rivaroxaban
3 3.74
the novel oral Once-daily Oral Direct Factor Xa Inhi-
anticoagulants over 4 8.70 bition Compared With Vitamin K Antag-
warfarin include fixed onism for Prevention of Stroke and
Q5 Insufficient data
dosing, rapid onset of a
Data from Pisters R, et al, Chest,26 Embolism Trial in Atrial Fibrillation
action, fewer drug journal.publications.chestnet.org/article. [ROCKET-AF]33), apixaban (Apixaban
interactions, no dietary aspx?articleid=1045174&issueno=5
restrictions, lack of &rss=1&ssource=mfr and Lip GY, Am J Med.27 for the Prevention of Stroke in Subjects
laboratory monitoring,
amjmed.com/article/S0002-9343(10)00452-3/ With Atrial Fibrillation [ARISTOTLE]35),
abstract.
and lower rates of b
HAS-BLED and, most recently, edoxaban (A Phase 3,
intracerebral hemorrhage. Hypertension 1 point Randomized, Double-Blind, Double-
Systolic blood pressure
9160 mm Hg Dummy, Parallel Group, Multi-Center,
Abnormal renal and/or 1 or 2 points Multi-National Study for Evaluation
liver function
Renal: Chronic dialysis or renal transplant
of Efficacy and Safety of Edoxaban
or serum creatinine Q200 2mol/L [DU-176b] Versus Warfarin In Subjects
Liver: Chronic hepatic disease or With Atrial Fibrillation - Effective Anti-
evidence of significant hepatic
derangement (bilirubin 92 upper coagulation With Factor Xa Next Gen-
limit of normal, in association with eration in Atrial Fibrillation [ENGAGE-AF
aspartate transaminase/alanine
transaminase/alanine transaminase TIMI-48]37). All of these novel oral anti-
93 upper limit of normal) coagulants (NOACs) were found to be
Stroke history 1 point
Bleeding history 1 point noninferior to warfarin, with dabigatran
Previous bleed, predisposition to (150 mg) and apixaban meeting superi-
bleeding, anemia
Labile international 1 point ority end points. All NOACs also had
normalized ratio lower rates of ICH when compared to
Time spent in therapeutic range G60% warfarin. However, there was more gas-
Elderly 1 point
Age 965 years trointestinal bleeding with dabigatran,
Drugs or alcohol 1 or 2 points rivaroxaban, and edoxaban. Not only
Drugs: Concomitant use of antiplatelet
agents and nonsteroidal was apixaban superior to warfarin in
anti-inflammatory drugs preventing stroke, it also resulted in
Excess alcohol: Q8 alcoholic units/wk
Maximum score 9 points lower mortality and less bleeding.
c
Based on initial validation cohort The NOACs can be considered as an
published by Pisters R, et al,26 with
insufficient events at HAS-BLED scores Q5.
alternative to warfarin in some patients,
as illustrated in Case 6-2. They have the
benefit of fixed dosing, rapid onset of
Novel oral anticoagulants. In recent action, fewer drug interactions, no
years, considerable effort has been dietary restrictions, and lack of labora-
made in evaluating new oral anticoagu- tory monitoring (Table 6-5). The lower
lant therapies as an alternative to war- rates of ICH are thought to outweigh
farin for preventing stroke in patients the higher rates of gastrointestinal
with AF. As of December 2016, three bleeding. NOACs may not be the best
118 ContinuumJournal.com February 2017
b Advantages
Warfarin
Once-daily dosing
Prothrombin time/international normalized ratio used for monitoring and widely available
Reversal agents widely available: vitamin K, fresh frozen plasma, prothrombin complex concentrate,
recombinant activated factor VIIa
Inexpensive
Longer half-life; better protection in patients who are noncompliant
Safer than novel oral anticoagulants in patients with significant renal dysfunction
Novel Oral Anticoagulants
No dietary restrictions
Can be used in fixed doses; with adjustments for age and renal function
No need for routine blood monitoring
Wide therapeutic window with low interindividual and intraindividual variability
Idarucizumab reverses dabigatran; hemodialysis and activated charcoal can also be used to reverse
this agent
Less risk of intracerebral hemorrhage than warfarin
Rapid onset of action
b Disadvantages
Warfarin
Dietary restrictions; need relatively constant vitamin K intake
Requires frequent blood monitoring, especially with initiation
Time in therapeutic range is approximately 55Y66%
Many drug interactions
Novel Oral Anticoagulants
May require more frequent dosing
Expensive
Renal function affects pharmacokinetics
Factor Xa inhibitors interact with cytochrome P450-3A4 and P-glycoprotein inhibitors; dabigatran
may be affected by P-glycoprotein inducers and/or inhibitors
Noncompliance less apparent since routine blood monitoring not required
No specific reversal agent for factor Xa inhibitors, although prothrombin complex concentrate or plasma
exchange may be used for life-threatening bleeds
Thrombin time, ecarin clotting time, and antifactor Xa assay are not as readily available in the acute setting
Because of short half-lives, strict compliance is crucial; missing even one dose results in diminished protection
a
TABLE 6-6 Summary of Oral Anticoagulant Therapies
KEY POINTS option in patients with a history of non- zumab is now available to reverse
h The selection of compliance, given twice-daily dosing, dabigatran.40 No validated method ex-
an appropriate method short half-lives resulting in a rapid sub- ists for reversing the factor Xa inhibi-
of anticoagulation therapeutic effect, and lack of routine tors. National guidelines suggest that
should be based on the laboratory testing to monitor compli- patients who have taken NOACs with-
individual’s risk factors,
ance. Dosing adjustments must be in the past 48 hours are ineligible for
cost, tolerability,
made in patients with renal dysfunc- thrombolytic therapy in the setting of
potential for drug
interactions, and
tion, and sometimes NOACs should be acute stroke, unless they have normal
patient preference. avoided altogether if renal impairment direct factor Xa activity assays, ecarin
is severe. Dosing adjustments have not clotting time, and thrombin time.41
h Idarucizumab is the
been established for obese individuals. These laboratory tests are not widely
newly approved reversal
agent for dabigatran.
The higher cost of the NOACs and the available in most acute settings.
ability to pay for long-term treatment Anticoagulation in the elderly. AF
must also be taken into account. Until prevalence increases with age, and
recently, no reversal agents were approximately 35% of patients with AF
approved for the NOACs, but idaruci- are over 80 years of age. In general, oral
KEY POINT
h Patients with is unclear and often varies in clinical diagnosed AF during their hospitali-
cryptogenic stroke practice. In higher-risk patients, such zation.23 The higher diagnostic yield
or transient ischemic as those with large territory infarcts, of longer periods of continuous car-
attack should have initial hemorrhagic transformation, diac monitoring posthospitalization has
prolonged cardiac uncontrolled hypertension, and bleed- been shown in the 30-Day Cardiac Event
monitoring within ing tendencies, the initiation of Monitor Belt for Recording Atrial Fibril-
6 months of the initial anticoagulation can be delayed beyond lation After a Cerebral Ischemic Event
vascular event. 2 weeks to closer to 4 weeks.23,30,46 (EMBRACE)47 and Study of Continuous
Large infarcts are usually defined as Cardiac Monitoring to Assess Atrial
more than one-third of the middle Fibrillation After Cryptogenic Stroke
cerebral artery territory or more than (CRYSTAL AF)48 trials and is illustrated
one-half of the posterior cerebral ar- in Case 6-3. In EMBRACE, 572 patients
tery territory. In the meantime, daily with cryptogenic stroke/TIA and no AF
aspirin should be administered. In the captured on 24-hour cardiac monitor-
setting of IV thrombolysis for acute ing were assigned to either 30 days
ischemic stroke, aspirin, as well as of an external loop recorder (inter-
other antiplatelet agents and anticoag- vention) or a 24-hour Holter monitor
ulants should be held for 24 hours. (control). Significantly higher rates
Notably, our knowledge of safety pro- of AF were detected in the external
files of the NOACs in the acute stroke loop recorder group compared with the
setting is limited, as patients with acute Holter group (16.1% versus 3.2%,
stroke 7 to 30 days prior were excluded PG.001), resulting in nearly double the
from the original trials.33,35,37,38 rate of anticoagulant initiation in the
intervention group at 90 days. CRYSTAL
Monitoring for Occult AF looked at a similar patient popu-
Atrial Fibrillation lation (441 patients) but instead ran-
Capturing paroxysmal AF can be chal- domly assigned patients to long-term
lenging as it is frequently asymptomatic monitoring with an insertable cardiac
and often first detected when patients monitor versus conventional follow-up.
present with an acute embolic stroke. The investigators concluded that insert-
A normal ECG in the setting of acute able cardiac monitoring was superior
stroke does not exclude the possibility to conventional follow-up for detect-
of paroxysmal AF preceding the event. ing occult AF in patients with crypto-
Paroxysmal AF may also go undetected genic stroke. At 6 months, AF had
on continuous hospital telemetry and been detected in 8.9% of the interven-
24- to 48-hour Holter monitors. National tion group versus 1.4% of the control
guidelines suggest that all patients with group (PG.001).
cryptogenic stroke or TIA have pro-
longed rhythm monitoring (approxi- VALVULAR DISEASE
mately 30 days) within 6 months of the The risk of cardioembolism in patients
initial vascular event,30 even though with valvular heart disease is depen-
the optimal method of monitoring is dent on many factors, including the lo-
uncertain. Several options exist for ex- cation of the diseased valve, severity of
tended cardiac monitoring, including the disease, and underlying pathology
ambulatory ECG (Holter) monitors, (eg, bacteria, malignancy, inflamma-
event (loop) monitors, and implantable tion). Some high-risk patients may be
loop recorders. candidates for antithrombotic therapy
An estimated 10% of patients with (antiplatelet agents, anticoagulants, or
acute stroke or TIA will have newly both), but the risk of adverse events
122 ContinuumJournal.com February 2017
must be weighed against the risk of (odds ratio 0.21; 95% confidence inter-
thromboembolism. val 0.16 to 0.27).49 The risk of throm-
boembolism is higher for a prosthetic
Prosthetic Mechanical Valves and mechanical valve in the mitral position
Bioprosthetic Valves compared to the aortic position, and
Patients with prosthetic mechanical thus a higher goal INR is recom-
valves are at high risk for thromboem- mended. In patients with a mechanical
bolization and should be treated with aortic valve (current-generation single
lifelong anticoagulation. Not only does tilting disc or bileaflet) and no other
the prosthetic material itself cause risk factors for thromboembolism, the
thrombogenicity, but the mechanical recommended goal INR is 2.5. A goal
valve promotes abnormal flow condi- INR of 3.0 is recommended in patients
tions with areas of low flow and areas with a mechanical mitral valve replace-
of high shear stress causing platelet ac- ment, patients with a mechanical aortic
tivation, which results in possible valve valve replacement who have other risk
thrombosis and subsequent emboliza- factors for thromboembolism (eg,
tion. Anticoagulation with warfarin is hypercoagulable state, AF, history of
protective against valve thrombosis (odds thromboembolism), or patients with an
ratio 0.11; 95% confidence interval 0.07 older-generation mechanical aortic
to 0.2) and thromboembolic events valve replacement (ball-in-cage).49 All
KEY POINTS
h All patients with patients with mechanical valve prosthe- year) when compared to prosthetic
mechanical valve ses should be on daily aspirin therapy mechanical valves, and thus daily aspi-
prostheses should (75 mg to 100 mg) in addition to anti- rin (75 mg to 100 mg) is recommended,
be on daily aspirin coagulation, as it decreases the inci- rather than warfarin therapy, to prevent
therapy in addition to dence of major embolism or death thromboembolism. Among biopros-
anticoagulation as this (1.9% versus 8.5% per year; PG.001) thetic valves, mitral prostheses also have
lowers the risk of stroke. and the risk of stroke (1.3% versus a higher risk of thromboembolism
h Novel oral 4.2% per year; PG.027). Therapy with compared to aortic prostheses, thus
anticoagulants are not low-dose aspirin and warfarin does in- warfarin is recommended for the first
indicated in patients crease the risk of minor bleeding 3 months after bioprosthetic mitral
with mechanical heart (bruising, epistaxis, hematuria) but valve replacement or repair, with a goal
valves, and warfarin not the risk of major bleeding.49 The INR of 2.5 (Table 6-7).49
remains the NOACs should not be used in patients
preferred treatment. with mechanical valve prostheses be- Infective Endocarditis
cause of lack of data on their safety Infective endocarditis is an infection
and effectiveness. involving the endocardial surface of
The risk of thromboembolism is the heart. It will often present with
lower in bioprosthetic valves (0.7% per stroke and has a high mortality rate,
even with aggressive antibiotic therapy monly affects the mitral valve. Multiple
and surgical intervention. It is esti- microorganisms can cause infective en-
mated that the in-hospital mortality docarditis, but the most common are
approaches 20%, while the 1-year Staphylococcus aureus, Streptococcus
mortality is closer to 40%.49 Patients viridans, and Enterococcus.50
with infective endocarditis may pre- All patients with suspected infective
sent with fever, weight loss, new cardi- endocarditis should have at least two
ac murmur, septic pulmonary infarcts, sets of blood cultures, complete blood
conjunctival hemorrhages, embolic cell count, TTE, serial ECGs, and TEE.
strokes, ICH, cerebral abscesses, renal TTE can sometimes detect valvular
infarcts, glomerulonephritis, or osteo- vegetations in infective endocarditis,
myelitis. Commonly associated risk but it will not definitely exclude vegeta-
factors include IV drug use, dental tions or abscesses. TTE can be useful in
infection, chronic hemodialysis, hu- characterizing the hemodynamic sever-
man immunodeficiency virus (HIV) ity of valvular dysfunction, evaluating
infection, prosthetic heart valves, intra- ventricular size and systolic function,
cardiac devices, structural heart dis- and measuring pulmonary pressures.
ease such as valvular disease (eg, However, TEE is superior to TTE in
rheumatic heart disease, mitral valve visualization of vegetations and de-
prolapse, aortic valve disease), and con- tecting perivalvular complications
genital heart lesions (eg, aortic stenosis, (eg, valve perforation, abscesses, peri-
bicuspid aortic valve). In developing cardial effusion, valve regurgitation,
countries, infective endocarditis is intracardiac thrombi) and is a mini-
most often associated with rheumatic mally invasive test for reliably diagnos-
heart disease (a complication of group ing infective endocarditis.49 Patients
A streptococcal infection), which com- should also have a brain MRI when
KEY POINTS
h Patients with infective possible as it is better than a head CT vegetations to embolize and cause ex-
endocarditis often have for showing multifocal infarcts of dif- tensive systemic infarcts. It is impor-
multifocal infarcts of fering ages with superimposed micro- tant to have a high index of suspicion
differing ages with hemorrhages, all characteristics classic to diagnose nonbacterial thrombotic
superimposed for infective endocarditis. endocarditis as many patients are ini-
microhemorrhages Antibiotic therapy is the foundation tially asymptomatic. The diagnosis is
on brain MRI. of treating patients with infective en- made when echocardiography dem-
h Antithrombotic therapy docarditis. The specific antibiotic and onstrates the presence of vegetations
(antiplatelet or duration of treatment depends on the in the absence of systemic infection. In
anticoagulant agents) underlying organism and should be contrast to infective endocarditis, pa-
in patients with infective guided by blood cultures and suscep- tients with nonbacterial thrombotic
endocarditis does not tibility profiles. Antithrombotic therapy endocarditis are routinely anticoagu-
reduce the risk of (antiplatelet or anticoagulant agents)
embolization and is
lated. Full-dose unfractionated heparin
does not reduce the risk of emboliza- or low-molecular-weight heparin is re-
instead associated
tion and is instead associated with a commended over warfarin, and this is
with a higher risk
higher risk of ICH. Patients with infec- usually continued indefinitely, assuming
of intracerebral
hemorrhage.
tive endocarditis classically have septic no serious complications develop.51
emboli, resulting in ischemic strokes While head-to-head trials comparing
h Full-dose with superimposed hemorrhagic trans-
unfractionated heparin heparin to warfarin in patients with
formation. Additionally, they develop nonbacterial thrombotic endocarditis
or low-molecular-weight
heparin is recommended
mycotic aneurysms and septic erosion have not been conducted, some older
over warfarin in patients of arteritic vessels, thus accentuating
studies (especially in cancer patients)
with nonbacterial the bleeding risk if antithrombotics are
have suggested that warfarin is less ef-
thrombotic endocarditis on board. It may be necessary to hold all
fective than heparin in preventing re-
to reduce embolization. antithrombotic therapy, including war-
farin therapy, in patients with AF and current thromboembolism, and this
mechanical valves because of the high has influenced clinical practice.
risk of bleeding in the acute setting.49
PATENT FORAMEN
This is a complex decision and should
OVALE CLOSURE FOR
be evaluated on an individual basis,
CRYPTOGENIC STROKE
weighing the risk of recurrent embo-
lization or valve dysfunction with that A patent foramen ovale (PFO) is an em-
of ICH. bryonic defect (hole) in the interatrial
septum that persists into adulthood in
Nonbacterial Thrombotic approximately 25% of the population.30
Endocarditis PFO is associated with cryptogenic stroke
Nonbacterial thrombotic endocarditis, and is considered a possible source in
or marantic endocarditis, is a some, as it potentially allows for a par-
noninfectious form of endocarditis adoxical embolus originating in the
that involves the deposition of sterile venous circulation to cross over into the
thrombi on heart valves (mostly mitral arterial circulation and reach the brain.
and aortic) and is primarily associated In recent years, percutaneous closure
with advanced malignancy. It is less of PFOs in patients with cryptogenic
commonly associated with inflamma- stroke has received considerable in-
tory conditions such as systemic lupus terest as a way to reduce the risk of
erythematosus and antiphospholipid recurrent stroke. Meta-analysis of three
antibody syndrome. Compared to pa- randomized controlled trials includ-
tients with infective endocarditis, a ing patients 60 years of age or younger
greater tendency exists for the fragile with cryptogenic stroke (A Prospective,
KEY POINTS
h The effectiveness patients without a left ventricular throm- heart failure and sinus rhythm on either
of anticoagulation bus but with anterior apical akinesis or anticoagulation or antiplatelet therapy
compared to dyskinesis. If patients are intolerant to should be individualized.
antiplatelet therapy warfarin therapy, dabigatran, rivaroxaban,
for secondary stroke or apixaban may be an alternative.30 AORTIC ARCH ATHEROSCLEROSIS
prevention in patients Aortic arch atheroma is an important
with heart failure HEART FAILURE risk factor for both cerebral and sys-
and sinus rhythm Patients with heart failure are at in- temic embolism, especially when
is uncertain. creased risk of stroke because of the plaque thickness measures 4 mm or
h Until further relative stasis of blood within the di- more, has mobile components, and is
randomized data are lated heart chambers (predisposing to noncalcified.61,62 Plaque ulceration is
obtained, guidelines thrombus formation) and high risk of thought to promote thrombogenicity,
suggest the use of superimposed AF. Several randomized and mobility suggests an unstable
antiplatelet and statin controlled trials have evaluated anti- plaque with superimposed thrombus.
therapy for patients
thrombotic therapies for use in patients TEE is better than TTE for evaluating
with ischemic stroke or
with heart failure and sinus rhythm, the aortic arch. Aortic arch athero-
transient ischemic
attack and aortic arch
with the largest and most recent being sclerosis shares many of the same risk
atheroma, since the the Warfarin Versus Aspirin in Reduced factors as ischemic stroke (eg, cigarette
effectiveness of Cardiac Ejection Fraction (WARCEF) smoking, hypertension, hyperlipid-
warfarin compared trial.59 WARCEF randomly assigned emia, diabetes mellitus), and most pa-
to antiplatelet therapy 2305 patients with sinus rhythm and tients benefit from aggressive risk
is uncertain. an ejection fraction of 35% or less to factor modification and statin and
receive either aspirin or warfarin and antiplatelet therapy. Since the risk of
followed them for a mean of 3.5 years. recurrent stroke is high (especially if
The rates of the primary outcome (time the atheroma is more than 4 mm in
to the first event in a composite end thickness or mobile), the best anti-
point of ischemic stroke, ICH, or death thrombotic therapy for secondary
from any cause) were 7.47 events per stroke prevention has been the subject
100 patient-years in the warfarin group of debate for many years. The Aortic
and 7.93 per 100 patient-years in the Arch Related Cerebral Hazard Trial
aspirin group, with no statistically sig- (ARCH) randomly assigned patients
nificant difference between the two with recent vascular events and aortic
groups. Warfarin, as compared to aspi- arch plaque measuring 4 mm or more
rin, was associated with a statistically or plaque measuring less than 4 mm but
significant reduction in the rate of is- with mobile elements to receive either
chemic stroke, 0.72 per 100 patient- aspirin plus clopidogrel or warfarin for
years versus 1.36 per 100 patient-years secondary prevention. The trial was
(hazard ratio 0.52; P=.005), with no terminated early for futility after enroll-
difference in the rates of ICH or death ment of 349 patients and was, thus, in-
between groups. The rate of major he- conclusive because of lack of power. A
morrhage (especially gastrointestinal) nonsignificant 24% reduction in rate of
was significantly higher with warfarin. recurrent stroke, myocardial infarction,
The WARCEF findings were confirmed peripheral embolism, and vascular
by a meta-analysis of four trials that death was seen in the aspirin plus
showed that warfarin was associated clopidogrel group, and these results
with a 41% reduction in the risk of may be the catalyst for further hypoth-
stroke and nearly twice the risk of major esis formation. Until further random-
hemorrhage.60 Because of these results, ized data are obtained, guidelines
the decision to place a patient with suggest the use of antiplatelet and statin
128 ContinuumJournal.com February 2017
15. de Abreu TT, Mateus S, Carreteiro C, Correia J. 25. Olesen JB, Lip GY, Hansen ML,
Therapeutic implications of transesophageal et al. Validation of risk stratification
echocardiography after transthoracic schemes for predicting stroke and
echocardiography on acute stroke patients. thromboembolism in patients with atrial
Vasc Health Risk Manag 2008;4(1):167Y172. fibrillation: nationwide cohort study.
16. Wolf PA, Abbott RD, Kannel WB. Atrial BMJ 2011;342:d124. doi:10.1136/bmj.d124.
fibrillation as an independent risk factor for 26. Pisters R, Lane DA, Nieuwlaat R, et al.
stroke: the Framingham Study. Stroke 1991; A novel user-friendly score (HAS-BLED) to
22(8):983Y988. doi:10.1161/01.STR.22.8.983. assess 1-year risk of major bleeding in
17. Go AS, Mozaffarian D, Roger VL, et al. Heart patients with atrial fibrillation: the Euro
disease and stroke statisticsV2014 update: Heart Survey. Chest 2010;138(5):1093Y1100.
a report from the American Heart Association. doi:10.1378/chest.10-0134.
Circulation 2014;129(3):e28Ye292. 27. Lip GY. Implications of the
doi:10.1161/01.cir.0000441139.02102.80. CHA(2)DS(2)-VASc and HAS-BLED Scores
18. You JJ, Singer DE, Howard PA, et al. for thromboprophylaxis in atrial fibrillation.
Antithrombotic therapy for atrial fibrillation: Am J Med 2011;124(2):111Y114.
Antithrombotic Therapy and Prevention of doi:10.1016/j.amjmed.2010.05.007.
Thrombosis, 9th ed; American College of
Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical 28. Lip GY, Frison L, Halperin JL, Lane DA.
Practice Guidelines. Chest 2012;141(2 suppl): Comparative validation of a novel
e531SYe575S. doi:10.1378/chest.11-2304. risk score for predicting bleeding risk in
anticoagulated patients with atrial
19. Lloyd-Jones DM, Wang TJ, Leip EP, et al. fibrillation: the HAS-BLED (Hypertension,
Lifetime risk for development of atrial Abnormal Renal/Liver Function, Stroke,
fibrillation: the Framingham Heart Study. Bleeding History or Predisposition, Labile
Circulation 2004;110(9):1042Y1046. INR, Elderly, Drugs/Alcohol Concomitantly)
doi:10.1161.01.CIR.0000140263.20897.42. score. J Am Coll Cardiol 2011;57(2):173Y180.
20. Miyasaka Y, Barnes ME, Gersh BJ, et al. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2010.09.024.
Secular trends in incidence of atrial
29. Hart RG, Benavente O, McBride R, Pearce LA.
fibrillation in Olmsted County, Minnesota,
Antithrombotic therapy to prevent stroke
1980 to 2000, and implications on the
in patients with atrial fibrillation: a
projections for future prevalence.
meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med 1999;131(7):
Circulation 2006;114(2):119Y125.
doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.595140. 492Y501. doi:10.7326/0003-4819-131-
7-199910050-00003.
21. Fuster V, Rydén LE, Cannom DS, et al. 2011
ACCF/AHA/HRS focused updates incorporated 30. Kernan WN, Ovbiagele B, Black HR,
into the ACC/AHA/ESC 2006 guidelines for the et al. Guidelines for the prevention of
management of patients with atrial fibrillation: stroke in patients with stroke and
a report of the American College of Cardiology transient ischemic attack: a guideline for
Foundation/American Heart Association Task healthcare professionals from the
Force on practice guidelines. Circulation American Heart Association/American
2011;123(10):e269Ye367. doi:10.1161/ Stroke Association. Stroke
CIR.0b013e318214876d. 2014;45(7):2160Y2236. doi:10.1161/
STR.0000000000000024.
22. Gage BF, Waterman AD, Shannon W, et al.
Validation of clinical classification schemes for 31. ACTIVE Investigators, Connolly SJ,
predicting stroke: results from the National Pogue J, et al. Effect of clopidogrel added to
Registry of Atrial Fibrillation. JAMA 2001;285(22): aspirin in patients with atrial fibrillation.
2864Y2870. doi:10.1001/jama.285.22.2864. N Engl J Med 2009;360(20):2066Y2078.
doi:10.1056/NEJMoa0901301.
23. January CT, Wann LS, Alpert JS, et al. 2014
32. American College of Cardiology Foundation;
AHA/ACC/HRS guideline for the management
American Heart Association; European
of patients with atrial fibrillation: a report of
Society of Cardiology; Heart Rhythm
the American College of Cardiology/American
Society, Wann LS, Curtis AB, Ellenbogen KA,
Heart Association Task Force on Practice
et al. Management of patients with
Guidelines and the Heart Rhythm Society. J
atrial fibrillation (compilation of 2006
Am Coll Cardiol 2014;64(21):e1Ye76.
ACCF/AHA/ESC and 2011 ACCF/AHA/HRS
doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2014.03.022.
recommendations): a report of the
24. Kim A. Evaluation and prevention of American College of Cardiology/American
cardioembolic stroke. Continuum Heart Association Task Force on
(Minneap Minn) 2014;20 practice guidelines. Circulation
(2 Cerebrovascular Disease):309Y322. 2013;127(18):1916Y1926.
doi:10.1212/01.CON.0000446103.82420.2d. doi:10.1161/CIR.0b013e318290826d.
39. Diener HC, Connolly SJ, Ezekowitz MD, et al. 49. Nishimura RA, Otto CM, Bonow RO, et al.
Dabigatran compared with warfarin in 2014 AHA/ACC guideline for the management
patients with atrial fibrillation and previous of patients with valvular heart disease: a
transient ischaemic attack or stroke: a report of the American College of Cardiology/
subgroup analysis of the RE-LY trial. Lancet American Heart Association Task Force on
Neurol 2010;9(12):1157Y1163. Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol
doi:10.1016/S1474-4422(10)70274-X. 2014;63(22):e57Ye185. doi:10.1016/
j.jacc.2014.02.536.
40. Pollack CV Jr, Reilly PA, Eikelboom J, et al.
Idarucizumab for Dabigatran Reversal. N 50. Selton-Suty C, Célard M, Le Moing V, et al.
Engl J Med 2015;373(6):511Y520. Preeminence of Staphylococcus aureus in
doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1502000. infective endocarditis: a 1-year
population-based survey. Clin Infect Dis
41. Demaerschalk BM, Kleindorfer DO, Adeoye
2012;54(9):1230Y1239. doi:10.1093/cid/cis199.
OM, et al. Scientific rationale for the
inclusion and exclusion criteria for intravenous 51. Whitlock RP, Sun JC, Fremes SE, et al.
alteplase in acute ischemic stroke: a Antithrombotic and thrombolytic therapy
statement for healthcare professionals from for valvular disease: Antithrombotic Therapy
the American Heart Association/American and Prevention of Thrombosis, 9th ed:
Stroke Association. Stroke American College of Chest Physicians
2016;47(2):581Y641. doi:10.1161/ Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines.
STR.0000000000000086. Chest 2012;141(2 suppl):e576SYe600S.
doi:10.1378/chest.11-2305.
42. Birman-Deych E, Radford MJ, Nilasena DS,
Gage BF. Use and effectiveness of 52. Furlan AJ, Reisman M, Massaro J, et al.
warfarin in Medicare beneficiaries with Closure or medical therapy for cryptogenic
atrial fibrillation. Stroke 2006;37(4): stroke with patent foramen ovale. N Engl J
1070Y1074. doi:10.1161/ Med 2012;366(11):991Y999. doi:10.1056/
01.STR.0000208294.46968.a4. NEJMoa1009639.
53. Meier B, Kalesan B, Mattle HP, et al. 58. Patent Foramen Ovale Closure or
Percutaneous closure of patent foramen Anticoagulants Versus Antiplatelet Therapy
ovale in cryptogenic embolism. N Engl J Med to Prevent Stroke Recurrence (CLOSE).
2013;368(12):1083Y1091. doi:10.1056/ clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT00562289.
NEJMoa1211716. Updated June 16, 2016. Accessed
54. Carroll JD, Saver JL, Thaler DE, et al. Closure November 29, 2016.
of patent foramen ovale versus medical 59. Homma S, Thompson JL, Pullicino PM,
therapy after cryptogenic stroke. N Engl J et al. Warfarin and aspirin in patients
Med 2013;368(12):1092Y1100. doi:10.1056/ with heart failure and sinus rhythm.
NEJMoa1301440.
N Engl J Med 2012;366(20):1859Y1869.
55. Spencer FA, Lopes LC, Kennedy SA, Guyatt doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1202299.
G. Systematic review of percutaneous
closure versus medical therapy in patients 60. Kumar G, Goyal MK. Warfarin versus aspirin
with cryptogenic stroke and patent foramen for prevention of stroke in heart failure:
ovale. BMJ Open 2014;4(3):e004282. a meta-analysis of randomized controlled
doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2013-004282. clinical trials. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis
2013;22:1279Y1287. doi:10.1016/
56. Device Closure Versus Medical Therapy for j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2012.09.015.
Cryptogenic Stroke Patients With High-Risk
Patent Foramen Ovale (DEFENSE-PFO). 61. Amarenco P, Cohen A, Tzourio C, et al.
clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT01550588. Updated Atherosclerotic disease of the aortic arch
August 8, 2012. Accessed November 29, 2016. and the risk of ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med
1994;331(22):1474Y1479.
57. GOREA HELEXA Septal Occluder/GOREA Septal
Occluder for Patent Foramen Ovale (PFO) 62. Amarenco P, Davis S, Jones EF, et al.
Closure in Stroke Patients - The Gore REDUCE Clopidogrel plus aspirin versus warfarin in
Clinical Study (HLX 06-03). clinicaltrials.gov/ patients with stroke and aortic arch
show/NCT00738894. Updated April 21, 2016. plaques. Stroke 2014;45(5):1248Y1257.
Accessed November 29, 2016. doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.113.004251.
Large Artery
Address correspondence
to Dr John Cole, Maryland
Stroke Center, University of
Maryland School of Medicine,
KEY POINTS
h Continuous vascular therapy is critical to prevent stroke in lesion is proximal to a vascular territory
risk factor optimization the setting of large artery atheroscle- that corresponds to the patient’s stroke
via sustained behavioral rosis. In fact, specific to the settings of on imaging or symptoms in the setting
modifications and intracranial and vertebrobasilar ath- of a transient ischemic attack (TIA). To
intensive medical erosclerosis as well as asymptomatic optimize anatomic localization (ante-
therapy is critical to carotid atherosclerosis, risk factor rior versus posterior circulation) in the
prevent stroke in the modification is the primary treatment setting of both stroke and TIA, clini-
setting of large cians must take a detailed history, ask-
option. In patients with symptomatic
artery atherosclerosis. ing about symptoms (eg, weakness,
extracranial carotid atherosclerosis,
h It is important to treatment options also include revas- sensory changes, vision changes, bal-
determine if the ance problems) and whether these oc-
cularization procedures such as carotid
identified large artery curred recently in isolation or multiple
endarterectomy (CEA) and carotid ar-
atherosclerotic lesion times in the past, over both the near
is proximal to a tery stenting, but, again, optimal med-
ical therapy is a critical treatment and long term. All patients with
vascular territory that
modality. Appropriate patient selection stroke and suspected TIA warrant an
corresponds to the
expedited evaluation that can be sim-
patient’s stroke on and timing of such revascularization
imaging or symptoms
ply defined as from heart to head. In
procedures must also be considered.
in the setting of a other words, the heart, proximal aorta,
Across each of these four clinical sce-
transient ischemic attack. and vasculature of the head and neck
narios, the results of numerous ran-
should be evaluated, and clinical and
domized and nonrandomized clinical
laboratory testing related to vascular
trials lead to periodically updated meta-
risk factors should be performed on an
analyses and consensus guidelines that inpatient basis. While it is beyond the
provide evidence-based recommenda- scope of this review to provide detailed
tions for practicing clinicians. While testing recommendations, at a mini-
each of these four clinical scenarios mum, a transthoracic echocardiogram,
could easily be (and often is) the sub- brain imaging via an emergent CT and
ject of independent reviews, this article then MRI, and vessel imaging of the
aims to provide a concise framework head and neck by CT angiography
for clinicians evaluating and treating (CTA) or magnetic resonance angiogra-
patients across all four scenarios, em- phy (MRA) should be performed in all
phasizing key clinical considerations, clin- patients with stroke and TIA. If large
ical trial evidence, and the most recent artery atherosclerotic disease is iden-
professional and societal guidelines. tified, other techniques, such as carotid
Doppler studies, contrast-enhanced
CONSIDERATIONS ACROSS MRA, and even judicious use of cere-
ALL CASES OF LARGE bral angiogram, can be used to better
ARTERY ATHEROSCLEROSIS define stenosis severity. To identify
While the clinical manifestations of patients at the greatest risk for stroke,
large artery atherosclerosis of the head large artery atherosclerotic plaque
and neck differ based upon the lesion stability and emboli potential can be
location, it is important to note that accessed via transcranial Doppler
they all share the same risk factor pro- (TCD) microembolus detection and
files, similar workups, and somewhat other, more research-oriented, tech-
overlapping treatment options. niques, such as plaque echolucency
measurements, that have yet to be
Clinical Presentation and Workup formally defined.1
First, it is important to determine if the Positive imaging demonstrating a
identified large artery atherosclerotic clearly defined infarction can make
134 ContinuumJournal.com February 2017
TABLE 7-1 Key Elements of Intensive Medical Therapy in the Setting of Large Artery
Atherosclerotic Diseasea
KEY POINT
h Hypertension and blood pressure control reduced intra- 2015 Systolic Blood Pressure Interven-
diabetes mellitus cranial hemorrhage to 0.4% of strokes.18 tion Trial (SPRINT) comparing a systolic
remain undertreated, Gastrointestinal hemorrhages could blood pressure target of less than
and personalized theoretically be reduced by the identi- 120 mm Hg (intensive treatment) to a
approaches to fication and treatment of Helicobacter target of less than 140 mm Hg (standard
lifestyle changes and pylori infections prior to the initiation treatment) was stopped early as related
medical therapy are of dual therapy. to a significantly lower rate of vascular
critical for successful In summary, dual antiplatelet therapy events in the intensive-treatment group
stroke prevention. can be considered across most settings than in the standard-treatment group
of large artery atherosclerosis, particu- (1.65% per year versus 2.19% per year;
larly in symptomatic carotid stenosis hazard ratio with intensive treatment,
or if the patient was already on mono- 0.75; 95% confidence interval 0.64Y0.89;
therapy at the time of his or her event. PG.001).20 While lowering blood pres-
The optimal duration of therapy will sure is strongly associated with reduc-
remain a topic of debate until further tion of stroke risk, the reduction of
informed by randomized clinical trials blood pressure to lower targets may
and their subgroup analyses. In the not be beneficial in all groups of
meantime, as consistent with SAMMPRIS, individuals, such as in patients with
3 months of dual antiplatelet therapy is flow-limiting large artery atherosclero-
reasonable while working to optimize sis or diabetes mellitus or the very
vascular risk factors, including healthy elderly. Diabetes mellitus is another
lifestyle decision making. well-established risk factor for stroke
Treatment of vascular risk factors. and large artery atherosclerosis. Opti-
Treatment of vascular risk factors, in- mal glucose control is achieved by
cluding dyslipidemia, hypertension, and reinforcing lifestyle changes (eg, dietary
diabetes mellitus, over both the near changes, regular exercise, weight loss)
and long term is of critical importance and through the faithful use of medica-
in the prevention and treatment of tions. Hypertension and diabetes
atherosclerotic disease. Recent changes mellitus remain undertreated, and per-
to lipid guidelines dramatically alter the sonalized approaches to lifestyle
prior emphasis focusing on specific changes and medical therapy are critical
LDL-C targets.19 Instead, the guide- for successful stroke prevention.
lines now emphasize the 10-year risk for
the development and progression of Other Emerging Risk Factors
atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. Other emerging risk factors for large
As based on an individual’s estimated artery atherosclerosis have been iden-
risk, a statin at low, moderate, or high tified, including elevated homocyste-
potency is now prescribed. Although ine, fibrinogen, lipoprotein (a), and
these new guidelines shift the emphasis C-reactive protein levels. Other lesser-
away from specific lipid targets, total known risk factors implicated include
cholesterol and high-density lipopro- obstructive sleep apnea,21 gout,22 and
tein values are components of the cardio- poor dentition.23 Future studies should
vascular risk calculator previously work to verify the results of these pre-
mentioned.9 Hypertension also con- liminary reports while considering im-
tinues to be a major well-documented plications for preventive strategies.
and modifiable risk factor for stroke, From a genetic standpoint, a recently
with the treatment of hypertension being published study by the National Insti-
the most effective strategy for stroke tutes of Health (NIH)/National Institute
prevention across all populations. The of Neurological Disorders and Stroke
138 ContinuumJournal.com February 2017
drop across the lesion or a flow reduc- arterial segment distal to the stenosis
tion distal to the lesion. Using the where the arterial walls first become
North American measurement method parallel.3 In contrast, the European
(Figure 7-1), the minimal residual lumen method (Figure 7-1) directly estimates
at the level of the stenotic lesion is the stenosis at the internal carotid bulb
compared to the diameter of the more using the formula: stenosis = (1jA/C)
distal internal carotid artery (ICA) 100%, where C is the estimated diameter
where the walls of the artery first be- of the disease-free carotid bulb. Catheter
come parallel using the formula: steno- angiography is considered the gold
sis = (1jA/B) 100%, where A is the standard for assessing stenosis but
diameter at the point of maximum carries a small risk of causing a stroke.
stenosis and B is the diameter of the Duplex ultrasound is the most
commonly used method to screen the
extracranial carotid artery for athero-
sclerotic stenosis and carries the lowest
risks and costs. Of note, duplex ultra-
sound may not accurately differen-
tiate between high-grade stenosis and
complete occlusion, with additional
testing required in such situations.
MRA noninvasively provides images of
both the cervical and intracranial vas-
culature. Notably, time-of-flight MRA
without contrast may overestimate the
degree of stenosis; thus, a gadolinium-
enhanced MRA may be useful, partic-
ularly when working to differentiate
high-grade stenosis from total occlu-
sion. Clinicians should be mindful
that nephrogenic systemic fibrosis is a
rare complication among patients with
poor renal function in the setting of
gadolinium use.
CTA is yet another method that can
be used to evaluate both the extra-
cranial and intracranial carotid cir-
culation. CTA disadvantages include
radiation exposure and the need for IV
injection of contrast material, with a
creatinine higher than 1.7 or a glomer-
ular filtration rate less than 45 mL/min/
1.73 m2 being common limiting fac-
Schematic contrasting tors. Additionally, atherosclerotic calci-
FIGURE 7-1
internal carotid artery fications with similar density to the
stenosis measurement
methods. The North American contrast material may confound accu-
measurement method: % stenosis = rate measurements of the stenosis. On
(1jA/B) 100%. The European physical examination, a carotid bruit
method: % stenosis = (1jA/C)
100%. can reflect an underlying carotid steno-
sis; however, sensitivity can be limited.
140 ContinuumJournal.com February 2017
KEY POINT
h Current surgical results that cannot be generalized to the 10.2% with CEA (P=.20) and 5.4% with
best practice restricts community. This is particularly evi- carotid artery stenting at 30 days and
carotid endarterectomy dent when the complications from 21.5% among patients who received
for asymptomatic angiography are removed from the CEA and 9.9% among patients who
carotid stenosis to surgical groups; when this is done, received carotid artery stenting (P=.02)
patients with 70% or the 30-day rate of stroke and death at 1 year. Of note, 3-year outcomes
greater carotid stenosis for CEA in ACAS drops to 1.52%.30 among patients receiving carotid artery
if the surgery can be Study complication rates are often stenting demonstrated a significantly
performed with a 3% lower than what is seen in standard higher death rate (20.0%) than stroke
or less risk of perioperative practice. In general, current surgical rate (10.1%).34 Further, there was no
complications.
best practice restricts CEA for asymp- medically treated control group in
tomatic carotid stenosis to patients with SAPPHIRE. The high complication rates
70% or greater carotid stenosis if the in both treatment groups raised con-
surgery can be performed with a 3% or cerns about the benefit of either inter-
less risk of perioperative complications. vention over medical therapy alone.
Of note, one recent review suggested The Carotid Revascularization Endar-
that for patients who are medically terectomy Versus Stenting Trial (CREST)
stable and have a life expectancy of at enrolled patients with both symptom-
least 5 years and a high-grade (80% or atic and asymptomatic carotid stenosis
greater) asymptomatic carotid stenosis who were eligible for either CEA or
at baseline or have progression to 80% carotid artery stenting.35 Patients with
or greater stenosis despite intensive asymptomatic carotid stenosis could be
medical therapy while under observa- included in the study if their stenosis
tion, CEA is reasonable, provided the was 60% or greater on angiography,
combined perioperative risk of stroke 70% or greater on ultrasound, or 80% or
and death is less than 3%.31 Further greater on CTA or MRA if the stenosis
research regarding this topic is ongo- on ultrasound was 50% to 69%.3,35
ing, with the NINDS-sponsored Carotid Patients were randomly assigned based
Revascularization and Medical Manage- upon symptom status. The primary
ment for Asymptomatic Carotid Stenosis end point was a composite of stroke,
Study (CREST-2) comparing centrally MI, or death resulting from any cause
managed intensive medical therapy during the periprocedural period or
alone to intensive medical therapy with any ipsilateral stroke within 4 years
CEA or carotid artery stenting.32 after randomization.3,35 No statistically
Endovascular treatment for asymp- significant difference was shown in
tomatic carotid stenosis. Carotid an- the 4-year occurrence rates of the
gioplasty and stenting was initially composite primary end point between
evaluated in patients thought to be at carotid artery stenting (7.2%) and CEA
high risk for CEA in the Stenting and (6.8%; hazard ratio, 1.11; 95% confi-
Angioplasty With Protection in Pa- dence interval 0.81Y1.51; P=.51),
tients at High Risk for Endarterectomy without any significant heterogeneity
(SAPPHIRE) trial.33 Using a composite based on symptom status. Notably,
outcome of stroke, MI, or death within the primary end point in CREST
30 days or death resulting from neuro- demonstrated an interaction with
logic cause or ipsilateral stroke between age, with age older than 70 years
31 and 365 days, it was demonstrated showing a significant benefit for CEA
that carotid artery stenting was not in- over carotid artery stenting. There-
ferior (within 3%; P=.004) to CEA. fore, it is important to consider
Rates of stroke, MI, or death were patient age when considering the
142 ContinuumJournal.com February 2017
Case 7-1
A 77-year-old woman presented for a neurologic evaluation after ‘‘some blockage’’ was detected in her
‘‘right neck artery’’ during ultrasound screening at a local mall. She had a history of dyslipidemia and
hypertension and was a former heavy smoker, and her mother had a stroke in her late fifties. She denied
prior stroke or transient ischemic attack symptoms. She was on aspirin 325 mg/d, atorvastatin 20 mg/d,
amlodipine 10 mg/d, and a diuretic. Her blood pressure was 130/80 mm Hg, and her heart rate was
70 beats/min and regular. Neurologic examination was normal, except for the presence of a right carotid
bruit. Carotid duplex ultrasonography was ordered and revealed bilateral plaques, with 70% or greater
stenosis (peak systolic velocity = 242 cm/s) on the right and less than 50% (peak systolic velocity = 72 cm/s)
on the left (Figure 7-2). CT angiography (CTA) was performed and interpreted as showing approximately
70% stenosis on the right and approximately 30% stenosis on the left. Low-density lipoprotein was
77 mg/dL. The patient was counseled regarding the uncertain benefit of revascularization in her age group.
FIGURE 7-2 Carotid duplex ultrasonography of the patient in Case 7-1. A, Right internal carotid artery: greater than
70% stenosis (peak systolic velocity = 242 cm/s). B, Left internal carotid artery: less than 50% stenosis
(peak systolic velocity = 72 cm/s).
Comment. This patient should be placed on intensive medical therapy, including her current agents
and increasing her moderate-intensity statin therapy of atorvastatin to 40 mg/d as based upon her age
and low-density lipoprotein level. This type of patient could be considered for enrollment in a clinical trial
such as the Carotid Revascularization and Medical Management for Asymptomatic Carotid Stenosis Study
(CREST-2), which is comparing outcomes with intensive medical therapy alone versus intensive medical
therapy plus carotid endarterectomy or carotid artery stenting.
KEY POINT
h As consistent with disease, ejection fraction 30% or less, Affairs Cooperative Study Program
recent guidelines, recent MI, severe lung or renal dis- (CSP).37 Patients with symptomatic
patients with ease) and anatomic factors (eg, prior carotid stenosis included those who
asymptomatic carotid neck operation or irradiation, post- had both greater than 70% ipsilateral
stenosis should be CEA restenosis, surgically inaccessible carotid stenosis and TIAs, transient
prescribed a daily aspirin lesions above C2 or below the clavicle, monocular blindness, or nondisabling
and statin and screened contralateral carotid occlusion, contra- strokes. A pooled analysis of these three
for other treatable risk lateral vocal cord palsy, or the presence randomized trials included more than
factors with appropriate of a tracheostomy).4 As consistent 3000 patients with symptomatic carotid
medical therapies with recent guidelines, patients with stenosis and demonstrated a 30-day
and lifestyle changes
asymptomatic carotid stenosis should stroke and death rate of 7.1% in patients
instituted.
be prescribed a daily aspirin and statin who were surgically treated.38 In pa-
and screened for other treatable risk tients with 70% to 99% (severe) steno-
factors with appropriate medical thera- sis, NASCET criteria found that for every
pies and lifestyle changes instituted. It six patients treated, one major stroke
is reasonable to consider performing would be prevented at 2 years (ie, a
CEA in patients who are asymptomatic number needed to treat of 6). Addition-
and have greater than 70% stenosis of ally, all three trials demonstrated that
the ICA if the risk of perioperative for patients with less than 50% (mild)
stroke, MI, and death is low (less than stenoses, surgical intervention did not
3%). In patients with greater than 50% reduce stroke risk. The role of CEA was
stenosis, it is reasonable to perform an- less clear among patients with symp-
nual duplex ultrasonography; however, tomatic stenosis in the 50% to 69%
screening low-risk populations for (moderate) range. Among the 858
asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis is patients who were symptomatic with
not recommended.3,4 50% to 69% stenosis in NASCET, the
5-year rate of any ipsilateral stroke
Symptomatic Extracranial was 15.7% in those surgically treated
Carotid Stenosis versus 22.2% in those medically treated
Over the past half century, numerous (P=.045).18 Therefore, 15 patients
clinical trials have compared CEA plus would have to undergo CEA to prevent
medical therapy to medical therapy one ipsilateral stroke during the 5-year
alone in the setting of symptomatic follow-up period. As such, CEA is only
carotid stenosis. Many of these studies justifiable when the risk-benefit ratio
predate the intensive medical therapy favors the patient when evaluating sur-
now recommended. Further, CEA tech- gical and anesthetic risks. Given that
niques have evolved and carotid artery medical management has improved
stenting has emerged as an alternative since NASCET, current guidelines ad-
preventive treatment. vise proceeding with CEA in the setting
Endarterectomy for symptomatic of symptomatic stenosis only if the
carotid stenosis. Three important surgeon’s rate for perioperative stroke
randomized clinical trials established or death is less than 6%.
the superiority of CEA plus medical In summary, for patients with a
therapy over medical therapy alone in TIA or ischemic stroke within the past
the setting of symptomatic high-grade 6 months and ipsilateral severe (70%
(greater than 70% angiographic steno- to 99%) carotid artery stenosis, CEA
sis) carotid stenosis: the European Ca- is recommended; for those with mod-
rotid Surgery Trial (ECST),36 NASCET,18 erate (50% to 69%) carotid stenosis,
and the US Department of Veterans CEA is recommended depending on
144 ContinuumJournal.com February 2017
KEY POINT
h Carotid artery stenting stroke, MI, or death was 4.8% among 2502 asymptomatic and symptomatic
can be considered as an patients assigned to receive a stent and participants with carotid stenosis (greater
alternative to carotid 9.8% among those assigned to undergo than 50% by angiography or greater
endarterectomy for endarterectomy. One-year rates of the than 70% by ultrasonography).35 No sig-
patients who are primary end point (death, stroke, or nificant difference was demonstrated in
symptomatic with MI at 30 days plus ipsilateral stroke or the composite primary outcome (30-day
greater than 70% death of neurologic causes within rate of stroke, death, and MI and 4-year
stenosis if the 31 days to 1 year) were 12.2% for carotid ipsilateral stroke) among those treated
anticipated rate of artery stenting versus 20.1% for CEA with carotid artery stenting versus CEA
periprocedural stroke or (P=.05) and were primarily driven by (7.2% versus 6.8%; P=.51). Among
death is less than 6%;
differences in the periprocedural MI patients with asymptomatic carotid
age should be
rates. Overall, the primary conclusion stenosis, the 4-year primary outcome
considered when
choosing between
from this trial was that carotid artery rate was 5.6% with carotid artery stent-
carotid endarterectomy stenting was noninferior to CEA in this ing versus 4.9% with CEA (P=.56),
and carotid high-risk cohort. However, outcome and among patients with symptomatic
artery stenting. analyses raised concerns that neither carotid stenosis, the rates were 8.6%
procedure was beneficial as compared with carotid artery stenting versus 8.4%
with medical management in patients with CEA (P=.69). When analyzing all
with asymptomatic carotid stenosis. patients, an interaction between age
Several other randomized controlled and treatment efficacy was shown
trials have compared CEA and carotid (P=.02), demonstrating increased risk
artery stenting for patients with symp- of carotid artery stenting in patients who
tomatic carotid stenosis, including the were older. The risk of MI did not
Carotid and Vertebral Artery Translu- increase with age in either treatment
minal Angioplasty Study (CAVATAS),42 group. The effects of age were primarily
Endarterectomy Versus Angioplasty in driven by stroke risk, which showed
Patients with Symptomatic Severe Carotid greater increase with age in the carotid
Stenosis (EVA-3S), Stent-Supported Per- artery stenting group than in the CEA
cutaneous Angioplasty of the Carotid group. The age at which the hazard
Artery Versus Endarterectomy (SPACE), ratio was 1.0 was approximately 70 years
and the International Carotid Stenting for the primary outcomes and 64 years
Study (ICSS). These trials have been for stroke. No difference in periproce-
analyzed in isolation and the latter three dural events was shown between carotid
in aggregate,43,44 with a preplanned meta- artery stenting and CEA among men, but
analysis demonstrating the rate of stroke a nonstatistically significant trend to-
and death at 120 days after randomiza- ward fewer events was demonstrated
tion to be 8.9% for carotid artery stent- with women and CEA. Periprocedural
ing and 5.8% for CEA (P=.0006). complications were lower in CREST
Notably, in subgroup analyses, among compared with older trials. An analysis
patients 70 years of age or older, the for the type of periprocedural compli-
rate of stroke or death at 120 days was cation identified important distinctions.
12.0% with carotid artery stenting com- Patients who had carotid artery stenting
pared with 5.9% with CEA (P=.0053). had lower rates of MI than patients who
In patients younger than 70 years of had CEA (1.1% versus 2.3%; 95% con-
age, no significant difference in out- fidence interval 0.26Y0.94) but higher
come was shown between carotid rates of stroke (4.1% versus 2.3%; 95%
artery stenting and CEA.44 confidence interval 1.14Y2.82).35
CREST compared the efficacy of ca- In summary and as consistent with
rotid artery stenting versus CEA among published guidelines, carotid artery
146 ContinuumJournal.com February 2017
Case 7-2
A 78-year-old man with a history of diabetes mellitus and current smoking presented to the
emergency department because of several episodes of transient speech difficulty and right hand
weakness occurring over the previous 2 days. He also reported flulike symptoms, including a productive
and persistent cough that had worsened recently. He stated he would not have come in, but
‘‘he couldn’t hold his cigarettes.’’ He was on aspirin 81 mg/d and metformin but was not on a statin. His
blood pressure was 135/75 mm Hg. Examination was notable for coarse breath sounds bilaterally and
decreased fine finger strength in the right hand rated at 3/5, but was otherwise normal. His initial head
CT was read as normal, with a subsequent brain MRI demonstrating a small cortical infarct in the left
frontal lobe on the diffusion sequence. Magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) demonstrated severe left
internal carotid artery (ICA) stenosis just distal to the bulb (Figures 7-3A and 7-3B). Carotid duplex
ultrasonography demonstrated severe left ICA stenosis (80% to 99%) and less than 40% stenosis on the
right side. Catheter-based angiography confirmed a focal high-grade ICA stenosis (Figure 7-3C). Given
the clinical transient ischemic attacks, the small infarct consistent with the proximal large artery
atherosclerosis lesion, and the large amount of brain at risk, he was scheduled for an urgent carotid
endarterectomy (CEA) to occur the following day.
FIGURE 7-3 Imaging of the patient in Case 7-2 with severe atherosclerotic high-grade stenosis
in the left internal carotid artery just distal to the bifurcation as shown on magnetic
resonance angiography (MRA) sequences (A, time-of flight; B, noncontrast arterial
spin labeling); trickle flow seen on conventional catheter angiogram (C).
Comment. Because of this patient’s age and symptoms, urgent carotid revascularization was
recommended, with CEA preferred. Because of the higher complication rate with carotid artery stenting
in patients 70 years of age or older, CEA is preferred over carotid artery stenting. His blood pressure
was normal, lowering his risks associated with reperfusion. He should be counseled to stop smoking
and provided with aggressive medical therapy and close outpatient follow-up.
KEY POINTS
h Current guidelines arm (P=.002). Also, at 1 year, the primary while already being treated with anti-
recommend that in end point rate was significantly higher thrombotic therapy. As such, current
patients with a recent in the PTAS arm (20.0%) versus the guidelines recommend that in patients
stroke or transient medical arm (12.2%; P=.009), primar- with a recent stroke or TIA (within
ischemic attack (within ily driven by the increased 30-day 30 days) attributable to severe stenosis
30 days) attributable to events in the PTAS arm. A subsequent (70% to 99%) of a major intracranial
severe stenosis (70% to analysis of the 30-day events in the artery, it is reasonable to add clopid-
99%) of a major SAMMPRIS PTAS arm revealed that a ogrel 75 mg/d to aspirin for 90 days,
intracranial artery, it is large number of the ischemic strokes along with the initiation of high-
reasonable to add occurred from occlusion of perforators potency statin therapy and a goal sys-
clopidogrel to aspirin for
(basilar perforators to the pons or tolic blood pressure below 140 mm Hg
90 days, along with
lenticulostriate perforators from the (Case 7-3).3 For patients with a stroke
the initiation of
high-potency statin
MCA) with the PTAS occluding the or TIA attributable to stenosis (greater
therapy and a goal perforator takeoffs (ie, ostium). Of than 50%) of a major intracranial artery,
systolic blood pressure the strokes that occurred within 30 days, angioplasty or stenting is not recom-
below 140 mm Hg. 10 of 33 (30.3%) in the PTAS arm and mended given the low rate of stroke
h For patients with a none of 12 (0%) in the medical arm with medical management and the
stroke or transient were symptomatic brain hemorrhages inherent periprocedural risk of endo-
ischemic attack (P=.04). The results of the medical vascular treatment, even among those
attributable to stenosis arm demonstrated better than ex- already taking an antithrombotic agent
(greater than 50%) pected 1-year event rates as compared at the time of the stroke or TIA.3 No-
of a major intracranial with WASID (12.2% observed versus tably, the current guidelines emphasiz-
artery, angioplasty 25% expected) and were thought to be ing maximal medical therapy after a
or stenting is not associated with the intensive medical stroke or TIA also apply to asymptom-
recommended given therapy used in the trial. A key distinc- atic intracranial atherosclerotic disease.
the low rate of tion is that patients in the WASID study One other notable study in the set-
stroke with medical
were treated with aspirin 1300 mg/d, while ting of intracranial stenosis is the previ-
management and the
the SAMMPRIS medical arm used aspi- ously described EC-IC Bypass Study.46
inherent periprocedural
risk of endovascular
rin 325 mg/d (in combination with While the focus of this study was pa-
treatment, even clopidogrel 75 mg/d) while achieving tients who were symptomatic with
among those favorable rates of stroke as compared extracranial carotid occlusion, it also in-
already taking with the intervention arm. Lower doses cluded patients with MCA stenosis and
an antithrombotic of aspirin have also been effective in patients with ICA stenosis above the
agent at the time of other large trials of secondary preven- second cervical vertebra (C2). Specifi-
the stroke or transient tion, many of which enrolled patients cally, 109 patients with 70% or greater
ischemic attack. with more heterogeneous stroke sub- MCA stenosis and 149 patients with 70%
types. Notably, of the 451 patients en- or greater ICA stenosis were randomly
rolled in SAMMPRIS, 284 (63%) had assigned to bypass surgery or medical
their qualifying event while undergoing treatment with aspirin 1300 mg/d and
antithrombotic therapy. In this large followed for a mean of about 4.5 years.
subgroup of the SAMMPRIS cohort, A statistically significant difference was
the rates of the primary end point were demonstrated in the rates of stroke
16.0% and 4.3% at 30 days and 20.9% during follow-up in patients with 70%
and 12.9% at 1 year in the stenting and or greater MCA stenosis, favoring the
medical arms, respectively (P=.03).51 medical arm (23.7%; 14 of 59) as com-
Overall, these results indicate that pared to the bypass arm (44%; 22 of
stenting (with the tested system) is not 50). Among patients with 70% or greater
a safe or effective rescue treatment for ICA stenosis above C2, the stroke rates
patients who experience a TIA or stroke during follow-up were 36.1% (26 of
150 ContinuumJournal.com February 2017
72) in the medical arm and 37.7% (29 intensive medical therapy, endovas-
of 77) in the bypass arm. Given these cular stenting, and, in rare cases, open
results, EC-IC bypass has largely been surgical revascularization; while maxi-
discontinued as a treatment for intra- mal medical therapy is the mainstay of
cranial stenosis. treatment in asymptomatic extracranial
vertebral artery atherosclerotic dis-
EXTRACRANIAL VERTEBRAL ease. Unfortunately, scant randomized
ARTERY ATHEROSCLEROTIC trial results exist specific to this set-
DISEASE ting, although analyses of some par-
Extracranial vertebral artery atheroscle- ticipants in the previously mentioned
rotic disease is a well-established cause CAVATAS trial42 as well as the Oxford
of posterior circulation stroke. Proximal Vascular Study (OXVASC)54 indicate that
vertebral (V1 segment) lesions account treatment should focus on vascular risk
for approximately 9% of all posterior factor reduction. The most relevant
circulation strokes,52 while vertebral study performed on this topic, the
artery ostial lesions may account for 2015 phase 2 Vertebral Artery Stenting
another one-third.53 Consistent with the Trial (VAST), was conducted in the
anterior circulation, the two primary Netherlands and identified patients
stroke mechanisms include plaque with a recent TIA or minor stroke asso-
rupture with subsequent artery-to- ciated with an extracranial (or intracra-
artery thromboembolism and hemody- nial) vertebral artery stenosis of at least
namic insufficiency. Treatment options 50%.55 Patients were randomly as-
for symptomatic extracranial vertebral signed to stenting plus best medical
artery atherosclerotic disease include treatment or best medical treatment
KEY POINT
h Routine preventive alone. All patients received best medical similar condition of recently symptom-
therapy with an treatment at the discretion of the atic large vessel intracranial stenosis, that
emphasis on treating neurologist, including anti- an aggressive medical therapy strategy,
antithrombotic therapy, thrombotic agents, a statin, and rigorous including dual antiplatelet therapy for
lipid lowering, blood control of other vascular risk factors. 3 months, statin therapy, blood pres-
pressure control, and The primary outcome was the compos- sure and glycemic control, and risk
lifestyle optimization ite of vascular death, MI, or any stroke factor modification, is highly effective
is recommended for within 30 days after the start of treat- for secondary prevention of stroke. It
all patients with ment. The trial was stopped after the remains unclear if aggressive medical
recently symptomatic inclusion of 115 patients because of therapy is as effective for patients with
extracranial vertebral
altered regulatory requirements, with symptoms caused by hemodynamic
artery stenosis.
57 patients assigned to stenting and compromise from extracranial vertebral
58 to medical treatment alone. Three artery atherosclerotic disease.
patients in the stenting group experi- In summary and as per current guide-
enced the primary outcome (5%, 95% lines, routine preventive therapy with
confidence interval 0% to 11%) versus an emphasis on antithrombotic therapy,
one patient in the medical treatment lipid lowering, blood pressure control,
group (2%, 95% confidence interval 0% and lifestyle optimization is recom-
to 5%). During the planned 4 years of mended for all patients with asymptom-
follow-up, 60 serious adverse events atic or recently symptomatic extracranial
(eight strokes) occurred in the stenting vertebral artery stenosis (Case 7-4).3
group and 56 serious adverse events Numerous retrospective nonrandom-
(seven strokes) in the medical treat- ized case series specific to stenting in
ment group. The investigators concluded the setting of extracranial vertebral ar-
that stenting of symptomatic vertebral tery atherosclerotic disease have been
artery stenosis was associated with a published. One review including 980
major periprocedural vascular compli- patients from 27 studies demonstrated
cation in about 1 in 20 patients and the a technical success rate of 99%, with a
risk of recurrent vertebrobasilar stroke periprocedural risk of 1.2% for stroke
under best medical treatment alone and 0.9% for TIA.57 In this study, parti-
was low. Based upon these results, a cipants were followed for an average
phase 3 study was deemed unwar- of 21 months perioperatively, with
ranted. Another study that completed vertebrobasilar territory stroke occur-
enrollment in February 2015 is the ring in 1.3% and TIA occurring in 6.5%.
Vertebral Artery Ischaemia Stenting Trial In a different prospectively maintained
(VIST).56 This is a UK multiple-center database of 114 patients undergoing
randomized controlled trial comparing stenting for 127 vertebral ostial lesions,
vertebral artery stenting/angioplasty of which 88% were considered to be
versus the best medical therapy alone either “highly likely” or “probably” the
in patients with symptomatic vertebral cause of the patient’s posterior circula-
artery stenosis greater than 50%. Re- tion symptoms, recurrence of symptoms
cruitment was stopped early at 182 at 1 year was just 2% after stenting.53
patients because of a cessation of In another review of 300 endovascular
funding as related to low recruitment. interventions in symptomatic vertebral
The primary end points are perioper- artery origin stenosis, periprocedural
ative risk and long-term efficacy, not neurologic complications occurred in
further specified; the final results are 5.5%, and the restenosis rate was 26%.58
pending. One can also infer from Based upon these results, current
SAMMPRIS, 8 which evaluated the guidelines3,4 indicate that endovascular
152 ContinuumJournal.com February 2017
stenting of patients with extracranial rate in the bare metal stent group
vertebral stenosis may be considered (33.57%) as compared to the drug-
when patients are having symptoms eluting stent group (15.49%) was
despite optimal medical treatment. identified (P=.001). When compared
Symptomatic restenosis rates in the with the drug-eluting stent group,
setting of extracranial vertebral artery the bare metal stent group also had a
atherosclerotic disease stenting remain significantly higher rate of recurrent
uncertain and are a topic of study. A symptoms (2.76% versus 11.26%; odds
2016 pooled analysis59 of five studies ratio = 3.32, P=.01).
comparing drug-eluting versus bare- Open surgical procedures for re-
metal stents found no significant dif- vascularization of extracranial verte-
ference in the technical success (odds bral artery atherosclerotic disease
ratio = 1.53, P=.62), clinical success include vertebral artery transposition
(odds ratio = 1.92, P=.27), and peri- and vertebral artery endarterectomy.
procedural complications (odds ratio = While such procedures are performed
0.74, P=.61) between the two stent rarely, they can be considered in pa-
types. A significantly higher restenosis tients with persistent symptoms despite
KEY POINT
h While vertebral intensive medical therapy. In one modifications and intensive medical
artery transposition older series of 27 patients, no periop- therapy.
and vertebral artery erative stroke or death was seen and
endarterectomy are two permanent neurologic complica- ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
performed rarely, they tions occurred (one case of Horner This work was supported by grants
can be considered in syndrome and one case of hoarseness); from the American Heart Association
patients with in addition, two patients developed (Cardiovascular Genome Phenome
persistent symptoms posterior circulation neurologic symp-
despite intensive Study ID number 15GPSPG237700000),
toms after the perioperative period.60
medical therapy. the National Institutes of Health
Larger randomized trials are required
(1U01NS069208), and the US Depart-
to better define evidence-based rec-
ment of Veterans Affairs.
ommendations for patients with extra-
cranial vertebral artery atherosclerotic
REFERENCES
disease and to determine if vertebral
1. Gounis MJ, van der Marel K, Marosfoi M, et al.
artery stenting is a viable primary treat- Imaging inflammation in cerebrovascular
ment option for patients with symp- disease. Stroke 2015;46(10):2991Y2997.
tomatic disease. doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.115.008229.
27. US Preventive Services Task Force. Screening stenosis. Veterans Affairs Cooperative
for carotid artery stenosis: US Preventive Studies Program 309 Trialist Group. JAMA
Services Task Force recommendation 1991;266:3289Y3294.
statement. Ann Intern Med 2007;
38. Rothwell PM, Eliasziw M, Gutnikov SA, et al.
147(12):854Y859. doi:10.7326/
Analysis of pooled data from the randomised
0003Y4819Y147Y12Y200712180Y00005
controlled trials of endarterectomy for
28. Endarterectomy for asymptomatic carotid symptomatic carotid stenosis. Lancet 2003;
artery stenosis: Executive Committee for the 361(9352):107Y116. doi:10.1016/
Asymptomatic Carotid Atherosclerosis S0140Y6736(03)12228Y3.
Study. JAMA 1995;273(18):1421Y1428.
39. Hugl B, Oldenburg WA, Neuhauser B,
29. Halliday A, Mansfield A, Marro J, et al. Hakaim AG. Effect of age and gender on
Prevention of disabling and fatal strokes restenosis after carotid endarterectomy.
by successful carotid endarterectomy in Ann Vasc Surg 2006;20(5):602Y608.
patients without recent neurological doi:10.1007/s10016Y006Y9028Y9.
symptoms: randomized controlled trial.
40. Howard VJ, Lutsep HL, Mackey A,
Lancet 2004;363(9420):1491Y1502.
et al. Influence of sex on outcomes of
doi:10.1016/S0140Y6736(04)16146Y1.
stenting versus endarterectomy:
30. Moore WS, Young B, Baker WH, et al. a subgroup analysis of the Carotid
Surgical results: a justification of the Revascularization Endarterectomy
surgeon selection process for the ACAS versus Stenting Trial (CREST).
trial. The ACAS Investigators. J Vasc Surg Lancet Neurol 2011;10(6):530Y537.
1996;23(2):323Y328. doi:10.1016/ doi:10.1016/S1474Y4422(11)70080Y1.
S0741Y5214(96)70277-X.
41. Cohen DJ, Stolker JM, Wang K, et al.
31. Mohler ER, Fairman RM. Management Health-related quality of life after carotid
of asymptomatic carotid atherosclerotic stenting versus carotid endarterectomy:
disease. UpToDate. uptodate.com/contents/ results from CREST (Carotid
management-of-asymptomatic-carotid- Revascularization Endarterectomy Versus
atherosclerotic-disease. Updated Stenting Trial). J Am Coll Cardiol
June 24, 2016. Accessed December 6, 2016. 2011;58(15):1557Y1565. doi:10.1016/
j.jacc.2011.05.054.
32. The carotid revascularization and medical
management for asymptomatic carotid 42. Endovascular versus surgical treatment
stenosis study. crest2trial.org. Accessed in patients with carotid stenosis in the
December 6, 2016. Carotid and Vertebral Artery
Transluminal Angioplasty Study
33. Yadav JS, Wholey MH, Kuntz RE, et al.
(CAVATAS): a randomised trial. Lancet
Protected carotid-artery stenting versus
endarterectomy in high-risk patients. 2001;357(9270):1729Y1737.
N Engl J Med 2004;351(15):1493Y1501. doi:10.1016/S0140Y6736(00)04893Y5.
doi:10.1056/NEJMoa040127. 43. International Carotid Stenting Study
34. Gurm HS, Yadav JS, Fayad P, et al. Investigators, Ederle J, Dobson J, et al.
Long-term results of carotid stenting Carotid artery stenting compared with
versus endarterectomy in high-risk endarterectomy in patients with
patients. 2008;358(15):1572Y1579. symptomatic carotid stenosis (International
doi:10.1056/NEJMoa0708028. Carotid Stenting Study): an interim
analysis of a randomised controlled trial.
35. Brott TG, Hobson RW 2nd, Howard G, Lancet 2010;375(9719):985Y997.
et al. Stenting versus endarterectomy doi:10.1016/S0140Y6736(10)60239Y5.
for treatment of carotid-artery stenosis.
N Engl J Med 2010;363(1):11Y23. 44. Carotid Stenting Trialists’ Collaboration,
doi:10.1056/NEJMoa0912321. Bonati LH, Dobson J, et al. Short-term
outcome after stenting versus endarterectomy
36. MRC European Carotid Surgery Trial: interim for symptomatic carotid stenosis: a preplanned
results for symptomatic patients with severe meta-analysis of individual patient data.
(70Y99%) or with mild (0Y29%) carotid Lancet 2010;376(9746):1062Y1073.
stenosis. European Carotid Surgery Trialists’ doi:10.1016/S0140Y6736(10)61009Y4.
Collaborative Group. Lancet 1991;
337(8752):1235Y1243. doi:10.1016/ 45. Lal BK, Beach KW, Roubin GS, et al.
0140Y6736(91)92916-P. Restenosis after carotid artery stenting and
endarterectomy: a secondary analysis of
37. Mayberg MR, Wilson SE, Yatsu F, et al. CREST, a randomised controlled trial. Lancet
Carotid endarterectomy and prevention of Neurol 2012;11(9):755Y763. doi:10.1016/
cerebral ischemia in symptomatic carotid S1474Y4422(12)70159-X.
KEY POINT
h The striking difference while seizures, sepsis, and toxic/metabolic were misdiagnosed and seven were ini-
between stroke in conditions accounted for much of the tially released from emergency evalua-
children and young remainder.16 Therefore, when an acute tion before stroke was diagnosed. What
adults is the pattern of brain attack is assessed in a child, many can delay stroke diagnosis further is a
identified risk factors more alternative diagnoses must be con- nonlocalizing presentation or if the symp-
and associated diseases. sidered than in an adult. Ideally, some toms are atypical or nonspecific, such as
type of recognition tool would help isolated acute vestibular symptoms.18
distinguish strokes from stroke mimics
in children.15 To date, no such tool has RISK FACTORS AND
been developed. The authors found that RECURRENCE RISK
an adult stroke tool did not distinguish The striking difference between stroke
children who had acute stroke from those in children and young adults is the
who had acute facial or limb weakness pattern of identified risk factors and
due to other causes.17 associated diseases (Table 8-2).19Y21
Young adults who present with strokes In the Vascular Effects of Infection in
may encounter similar delays in diag- Pediatric Stroke (VIPS) study of 355
nosis when stroke is not considered children who had arterial ischemic
because of their age. In one prospective stroke after the neonatal period, 30%
series, 57 individuals 16 to 50 years of had congenital or acquired cardiac dis-
age had acute stroke. Of these, eight ease, 36% had definite vascular disease
TABLE 8-2 Risk Factors and Comorbidities for Stroke in Children and
Young Adultsa
(arteriopathy), 10% had suspected tion, 12% had small vessel occlusion, 9%
arteriopathy, and 18% had acute fever had large-artery atherosclerosis, and
or systemic sepsis.19 The risk factors 9% had other identified causes (not dis-
seen in older adults (hypertension, hy- section), followed by thrombophilias, an-
perlipidemia, smoking, and diabetes tiphospholipid antibody syndrome,
mellitus) were not commonly found in systemic vasculitis, migraine with aura,
this age range. In comparison, in a large and others.22 Young adults have a sub-
European cross-sectional study of 3331 stantial number of potentially modifiable
young adults with first-time ischemic risk factors20,21 that are similar to those
stroke, 17% had cardioembolic dis- common in older adults (Table 8-2).
ease, 13% had cervical artery dissec- The presence of these modifiable risk
factors offers opportunities for second- ciated with an increasing odds ratio for
ary prevention in young adults, while stroke in the infant. Circulating antico-
the opportunities for secondary pre- agulant proteins are normally low in the
vention in children are far more limited. fetus and do not rise to adult levels
The difference in presumed risk fac- until 1 year of age.25 This combination
tors is even more pronounced in neo- of temporary procoagulant states has
nates. The identification of stroke risk been proposed to contribute to neona-
factors in neonates has been limited, tal arterial ischemic stroke (Case 8-1).26
but pregnancy, particularly in the months The risk factor profiles influence the
just before delivery, is a relatively hy- type of stroke mechanistic evaluation
percoagulable state.23 This may con- for different age ranges and the strate-
tribute to clotting in the placenta, which, gies used for secondary prevention. A
in turn, might serve as a source of key question is the rate of stroke recur-
embolus to the fetus/newborn. A 2016 rence for children and young adults. In
case-control study of infants with neo- the VIPS study mentioned previously,
natal arterial ischemic stroke found 278 subjects were followed for at least
that their mothers had experienced 1 year after the incident stroke. Of these
more intrapartum complications when subjects, 40 (14%) had a recurrent stroke
compared with controls.24 Prolonged that occurred at a median of 23 days
rupture of membranes (21% versus 2%), after the incident stroke. The risk factors
fever (14% versus 3%), thick meconium associated with the highest 1-year risk
(25% versus 7%), prolonged second of recurrence were definite arteriopathy
stage (31% versus 13%), and tight nuchal (N = 127), with recurrence risk of 21%;
cord (15% versus 6%) occurred more possible arteriopathy (N = 34), with
frequently in the mothers whose infants recurrence risk of 12%; cardioembolic
had stroke. The presence of more than stroke (N = 65), with a recurrence risk
one intrapartum complication was asso- of 8.1%; and idiopathic stroke (N = 90),
Case 8-1
A 7-year-old girl had 1 week of upper respiratory tract symptoms, then 5 days of high fever. She was
treated with an antibiotic for pharyngitis, but became increasingly sleepy and confused. Reevaluation
determined meningismus and an altered mental state. A blood culture from her initial evaluation
grew Streptococcus pneumoniae. She was given fluids and antibiotics and transferred to the authors’
institution for treatment of sepsis.
On arrival, she was hypotensive and obtunded; she was intubated and given fluids, vasopressors,
and broad-spectrum antibiotics. An echocardiogram identified a large vegetation on the mitral valve.
A lumbar puncture showed bacterial meningitis. Her neurologic examination while sedated and
intubated was remarkable for meningismus, limited arousal to painful stimulation, equal movements
of all limbs, and hyperactive symmetric tendon reflexes.
A brain MRI was obtained on the third hospital day for the mitral valve vegetation, showing
abnormal diffusion in the territory of the left middle cerebral artery (MCA) but no occlusion of the
major cerebral arteries (Figure 8-1). Repeat neurologic examination noted limited pain arousal, no right
arm movement, decreased right face and leg movement, and hyperactive tendon reflexes on her
right. The risk for acute recurrent embolic stroke necessitated emergency replacement of the mitral
valve. She received no anticoagulation until the third postoperative day when warfarin was started.
A follow-up CT scan showed cerebral edema with mild midline shift to the right. The patient’s sepsis
improved so she could be extubated, off sedation, and followed clinically.
Continued on page 163
FIGURE 8-1 Imaging of the patient in Case 8-1. A, Diffusion restriction on brain MRI in the
distribution of the left middle cerebral artery consistent with extensive acute
infarction. B, Intracranial magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) shows
patent proximal segment of the left middle cerebral artery without evidence of large
vessel occlusion.
Comment. Detection of acute stroke may be difficult in patients who are sedated because of severe
acute systemic illness. Although acute revascularization strategies have been proposed in children,
applications may be constrained by clinical events. Acute stroke in children presents with similar issues
as in young adults; large MCA infarcts require close observation for malignant MCA syndrome. From a
rehabilitation perspective, multiple challenges exist in children as they have a much longer lifespan
than an adult who is elderly. How the potential for neural plasticity can best be harnessed in a child,
how long rehabilitation should be pursued for children poststroke, and whether long-term
interventions offer sustained benefits are questions yet to be answered.
with a recurrence risk of 4.5%.27 For with underlying nonatherosclerotic cere- KEY POINT
those children with definite arteriopathy, brovascular disease. In neonatal stroke, h In neonatal stroke, the
those with moyamoya had a 1-year the immediate recurrence risk appears to immediate recurrence
risk appears to be very
recurrence risk of 32% (N = 34), those be very low, unless a congenital heart
low, unless a congenital
with transient cerebral arteriopathy had a lesion associated with cardiogenic embo-
heart lesion associated
25% recurrence risk (N = 25), those with lism or a hypercoagulable disorder asso- with cardiogenic
arterial dissection had a 19% recurrence ciated with systemic thrombosis exists.28 embolism or a
risk (N = 26), and those with vasculitis In young adults, the problems of re- hypercoagulable disorder
secondary to acute infections had a 6.7% currence are very different, for increased associated with systemic
recurrence risk (N = 15). In children, the risk exists not only for recurrent cere- thrombosis exists.
risk of recurrence is most strongly linked bral ischemia but also for myocardial
Continuum (Minneap Minn) 2017;23(1):158–180 ContinuumJournal.com 163
KEY POINT
h Brain imaging is essential ischemia and death. In a Finnish study stenosis are not routinely ordered. Atrial
in children to confirm the of 807 patients, the 5-year cumulative fibrillation is distinctly uncommon in
presence of an ischemic recurrence rate for ischemic stroke or children, so extended cardiac rhythm
stroke and to rule out myocardial infarction (nonfatal and fatal) monitoring is not routinely performed
a hemorrhagic stroke, was 11.5%.29 Predictors of recurrence in children with cryptogenic stroke.
but each modality were type 1 diabetes mellitus, large ar- Brain imaging is essential to confirm
has benefits and tery atherosclerosis, heart failure, pre- the presence of an ischemic stroke and
disadvantages to vious transient ischemic attack (TIA), to rule out a hemorrhagic stroke, but
consider. and increasing age. Similarly, in a Dutch each modality has benefits and disad-
study of 446 patients with ischemic vantages to consider (Table 8-3).31 CT
stroke, the 20-year risk of recurrent is fast and readily available and is sen-
ischemic stroke was 19.4%.30 Patients sitive for hemorrhage but has low sen-
who had atherothrombotic, cardioem- sitivity for acute ischemia within the
bolic, or lacunar stroke had increased first 6 hours of symptom onset. MRI is
risk for recurring stroke. These findings sensitive to acute ischemia but is less
were similar to an Italian study of 1867 readily available, and younger chil-
young adults with first ischemic stroke. dren may not be able to lie still for a
The 10-year cumulative risk for a com- complete study without general anes-
posite end point of ischemic stroke, TIA, thesia. Some pediatric centers have
or myocardial infarction was 14.7%. Fac- developed minimum-sequence MRI pro-
tors that increased the risk of these tocols to reduce the scanning time
events included migraine with aura, fam- when looking for an acute stroke. Such
ily history of stroke, discontinuation of a protocol would include diffusion-
antiplatelet or antihypertensive medica- weighted imaging, a fluid-attenuated
tion, or antiphospholipid antibodies. inversion recovery (FLAIR) sequence,
a gradient recalled echo (GRE) or
EVALUATION susceptibility-weighted imaging (SWI)
The risk factor and recurrence profiles sequence, and time-of-flight MRA of
suggest that the evaluation for a child the head and neck.33 If the patient
should be somewhat different from that does not have a stroke, however, such a
for an adult. In a child, the diagnostic limited protocol may be insufficient to
approach should focus on identification characterize other pathology. Magnetic
of possible factors that might lead to resonance vascular imaging avoids
short-term recurrence, such as a car- radiation exposure, but the resolution
diac source for embolism.31,32 A vascul- limits the ability to look at medium
opathy may lead to further strokes from and small cerebral vessels. CT angiog-
progressive stenosis or thromboembo- raphy can be performed quickly, and
lism, so vascular imaging of the brain the resolution approaches that of
and neck is important to identify intra- catheter angiography, but the amount
cranial and extracranial pathology. ECG of radiation has generated a debate
and echocardiogram (transesophageal about its use in young children, par-
when appropriate) also should be per- ticularly if longitudinal follow-up is
formed when a child has a first-time needed. Catheter angiography is the
arterial ischemic stroke. In contrast, ath- gold standard and is sensitive to small
erosclerosis is not known to play a sig- vessel disease, such as is found in vas-
nificant role in pediatric arterial ischemic culitis, but involves the risks of an in-
stroke, although lipid profiles are not sys- vasive procedure and is less feasible
tematically pursued in children. Doppler for longitudinal follow-up. For children
evaluations looking for carotid artery who have a pattern of venous infarcts,
164 ContinuumJournal.com February 2017
Stroke Imaging Advantages for Infants and Limitations for Infants and
Modalities Young Children Young Children
CT brain Fast; sufficient for hemorrhage; readily Radiation exposure; insensitive to acute
available at all hours ischemic change
MRI brain Sensitive to early ischemic change; higher Not readily available at some hospitals
resolution than CT scan during nights, weekends, holidays;
complete MRI study frequently requires
sedation/anesthesia in younger children;
some hospitals have protocols with limited
sequences specific for stroke; implanted
hardware/devices pose potential restrictions
and safety concerns handled case by case
CT angiography Fast; approaches catheter angiography in Significant radiation burden; requires
resolution postprocessing
CT venography Fast; can localize and grade diseased Significant radiation burden; requires
venous segments postprocessing
CT perfusion Can provide absolute and relative Significant radiation burden; requires
measures of perfusion in local regions postprocessing; negligible pediatric
of hemisphere experience at present
MR angiography Can localize and grade diseased vascular Same limitations as MRI; resolution not as
segments; no radiation exposure so sensitive as CT angiography or catheter
can be used serially angiography; requires postprocessing
MR venography Can localize and grade diseased venous Same limitations as MRI; requires
segments; no radiation exposure so postprocessing; very susceptible to
can be used serially technical artifact; hypoplastic sinuses
may mimic thrombotic occlusion
MR perfusion Can provide measures of perfusion to Same limitations as MRI; requires
identify regions at hemodynamic risk; no postprocessing; emerging experience
radiation exposure so can be used serially in children
SPECT perfusion Acetazolamide challenge can demonstrate Requires radionuclide exposure; younger
areas where perfusion varies with children require sedation/anesthesia;
challenge; can be used to anticipate requires postprocessing; limited
regions at risk for infarction availability at pediatric centers
Catheter angiography Gold standard Invasive; typically requires sedation; does
not provide perfusion data
CT = computed tomography; MR = magnetic resonance; MRI = magnetic resonance imaging; SPECT = single-photon emission computed
tomography.
a
Data from Moharir M, Deveber G, Continuum (Minneap Minn).31 journals.lww.com/continuum/Fulltext/2014/04000/Pediatric_Arterial_
Ischemic_Stroke.14.aspx.
risk of arterial and venous thrombo- in children with arterial ischemic stroke
embolic events. Deficiencies in the end- is estimated to range from 20% to 50%.35
ogenous anticoagulants were described However, given that most pediatric
in the 1960s (antithrombin) and the arterial ischemic strokes occur in the
1980s (protein C and protein S). More setting of multiple risk factors, the
recently, point mutations in the factor exact significance of identifying a
V gene (F5) R506Q and factor II gene, thrombophilia on the eventual neuro-
(F2) G20210A were identified and found logic outcome, treatment selection, and
to be more prevalent than the previ- duration of therapy remains unclear.
ously described deficiencies in natural The association between thrombo-
anticoagulants.34 Other defects, includ- philia and perinatal arterial ischemic
ing dysfibrinogenemia, elevated factor stroke is difficult to estimate given the
VIII activity (FVIII:C), elevated lipoprotein physiologically low levels of endoge-
(a), and hyperhomocysteinemia, have nous anticoagulants in neonates.36 A
since been associated with arterial is- 2010 meta-analysis of six studies esti-
chemic stroke (Table 8-4). The preva- mated a 3.56-fold (95% confidence
lence of an identifiable thrombophilia interval 1.02Y3.99) increased risk of
heterozygosity for F5 R506Q, and a
2.02-fold (95% confidence interval
TABLE 8-4 Common 1.02Y3.99) increased risk of heterozy-
Thrombophilias
Detected During gosity for F2 G20210A in perinatal ar-
Laboratory Testing terial ischemic stroke/cerebral sinus
venous thrombosis.37 The association
b Congenital between thrombophilia and risk of re-
current stroke following perinatal arte-
Deficiency of natural
anticoagulants rial ischemic stroke is unknown.
Two systematic reviews assessed the
Antithrombin deficiency
relationship between thrombophilia and
Protein C deficiency childhood-onset stroke (Table 8-5).37Y39
Protein S deficiency Interestingly, these reviews arrived at
contradictory conclusions. Haywood and
Blocking anticoagulant
effect
colleagues reviewed 18 case-control stud-
ies published between 1996 and 2002
Factor V Leiden (F5) R506Q investigating the association between
mutation
thrombophilia and childhood-onset
Elevated levels of procoagulant stroke (1 month to 18 years of age).
proteins Only protein C deficiency was statisti-
Prothrombin (F2) G20210A cally associated with childhood-onset
mutation stroke (odds ratio 6.5; 95% confidence
Elevated factor FVIII level interval 3Y14.3).38 Kenet and colleagues
performed a more recent meta-analysis
Others
of 22 studies (published between 1970
Hyperhomocysteinemia and 2009) and concluded that all throm-
Elevated lipoprotein (a) bophilias, except for antithrombin and
b Acquired
protein S deficiencies, were statisti-
cally associated with pediatric stroke.37
Antiphospholipid antibody Different inclusion criteria for the two
syndrome
analyses likely explain the different re-
sults. However, these results should be
166 ContinuumJournal.com February 2017
KEY POINT
h The authors offer stroke (hazard ratio 7.89; 95% confi- sickle cell screen/hemoglobin electro-
thrombophilia testing dence interval 1.78Y34.92).40 These phoresis.41 Similarly, the 2008 American
to patients with differing results indicate that large pro- Heart Association guidelines con-
childhood-onset stroke, spective studies are needed to clarify cluded that it was reasonable to test
particularly when other the association between thrombophilia for common prothrombotic conditions
risk factors are not and stroke recurrence in children. in childhood-onset stroke, even when
identified and after other risk factors for stroke are identi-
discussing risks and RELEVANCE OF THROMBOPHILIA fied.42 In contrast, in 2010 the British
benefits of such testing TESTING IN PEDIATRIC ARTERIAL Committee for Standards in Haema-
with the patient and ISCHEMIC STROKE tology suggested that testing for herita-
family. Testing is
Although studies and meta-analyses ble thrombophilia was not indicated in
typically done acutely
have indicated an association between children with stroke.43 Similarly, the
and repeated at
3 months if specific
congenital/acquired thrombophilia and 2012 American College of Chest Physi-
abnormalities pediatric stroke, the exact impact of cians (ACCP) guidelines do not rec-
are identified. thrombophilia on risk of recurrence ommend changing the duration or
and clinical outcome, the economic intensity of anticoagulation based on
effectiveness of testing, and the psy- the presence or absence of an identi-
chological impact of a thrombophilia fiable thrombophilia.44
diagnosis upon patient and family are In the absence of robust evidence
unclear. Except for very specific clinical or consistent guidelines, it is diffi-
scenarios (eg, antiphospholipid anti- cult to make recommendations on
body syndrome), the results of thrombo- thrombophilia testing in pediatric ar-
philia testing rarely impact treatment terial ischemic stroke. At the authors’
selection or duration of therapy. The institution, thrombophilia testing is
proposed potential benefits of testing offered to patients with childhood-
(guidance of testing in family members, onset stroke, particularly when other
informed decisions on future estrogen risk factors are not identified and after
therapy in girls, and guidance of throm- discussing risks and benefits of such
boprophylaxis recommendations for testing with the patient and family.
future high-risk situations) are not evi- Testing is typically done acutely and
dence based and have not been shown repeated at 3 months if specific ab-
to improve outcomes.34 normalities are identified. Given the
Interestingly, the ambiguity surround- low risk of recurrence, acute testing is
ing thrombophilia testing is reflected in rarely offered in cases of perinatal ar-
the divergent recommendations made terial ischemic stroke (with the excep-
by international consensus guidelines. tion of arterial ischemic stroke in the
In 2002, the perinatal/pediatric subcom- setting of neonatal purpura fulminans).
mittee of the International Society on Risks and benefits of thrombophilia
Thrombosis and Haemostasis (ISTH) testing are usually discussed with fam-
recommended that all children with ilies at 1-year follow-up and testing is
arterial or venous thrombosis be tested performed for specific cases, such
for genetic and acquired thrombotic as in patients with a strong family history
states, including complete blood cell of thrombosis or when a patient is
count, antithrombin activity, protein C perceived to be at high risk for recur-
activity, free and total protein S anti- rent thrombotic events (eg, complex
gen, F5 R506Q and F2 G20210A mutation congenital heart disease) in which there
testing, MTHFR T677T and/or fasting might be a role of future thrombopro-
homocysteine, lipoprotein (a), lupus anti- phylaxis during high-risk situations.
coagulant, anticardiolipin antibody, and Standard thrombophilia testing at the
168 ContinuumJournal.com February 2017
Case 8-2
A 7-year-old girl presented with long-standing headaches that became more severe and frequent.
When she developed a headache with right hand numbness, a brain MRI was performed and thought
to show an arteriovenous malformation. Magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) and catheter
angiography showed enlarged vertebral and basilar vessels, right internal carotid artery occlusion, left
middle cerebral artery (MCA) stenosis, and numerous collateral vessels consistent with moyamoya
disease, Suzuki stage III to IV (the Suzuki stages range from I to VI, with the higher score indicating a
greater severity of stenosis) (Figures 8-2A, 8-2B, and 8-2C). Scattered punctate T2 and fluid-attenuated
inversion recovery (FLAIR) positive areas in the deep white matter suggested prior ischemic injury. She
was initially treated with aspirin and soon had a left pial synangiosis; the right side was not addressed
because of the prominent collateral supply from the posterior circulation.
Eighteen months after the pial synangiosis, she developed recurring headaches, nausea, and
vomiting that varied in frequency. Topiramate 1.5 mg/kg/d was prescribed without change in headache
frequency. Two years after her initial
presentation, she reported an episode of right
hand numbness similar to her original
presentation. Her neurologic examination
remained normal. CT angiography showed stable
moyamoya pattern and a stable left external
carotid artery branch supplying the synangiosis
(Figure 8-2D). Magnetic resonance perfusion in
the left hemisphere showed 10% lower
perfusion than the right, but no focal area of
decreased perfusion. The headaches continued
with variable right hand numbness. Adding
clopidogrel yielded no change, so 3 to 4 months
after the headaches and right hand numbness
recurred, topiramate was increased to 5 mg/kg/d
and the headaches promptly decreased. She
remained free of severe headache for the
following 9 months.
Comment. This case illustrates that
moyamoya can occur without any identifiable
risk factors. Monitoring disease progression in
children can be challenging because of the
need for monitoring over many years and the
limited tools to predict which areas at risk will
progress to infarction. Indirect revascularization
(such as a pial synangiosis where the superficial FIGURE 8-2 Imaging of the patient in Case 8-2. A,
Catheter angiogram, left vertebral artery
temporal artery is sutured to the pia mater) is injection. The long arrow identifies
technically more feasible in young children, but moyamoya collateral vessels. The short arrow illustrates that
this is a left vertebral artery injection filling the right middle
to be successful, a pial synangiosis must be cerebral artery and both anterior cerebral arteries via a
performed where sufficient cerebral ischemia large right posterior communicating artery. B, Catheter
exists to promote the proliferation of collateral angiogram, right common carotid artery injection. Absent
flow into the internal carotid artery (short arrow) and
vessels. Patients with moyamoya syndrome may collateral flow via the middle meningeal artery (long arrow)
also have migraine, which can be extremely to the supraclinoid right internal carotid artery are seen. C,
difficult to distinguish from the patient’s Catheter angiogram, left internal carotid artery injection.
Severe stenoocclusive disease and prominent moyamoya
moyamoya symptoms. This child’s response to an collateral vessels are seen. D, CT angiogram. The red arrow
adequate trial of topiramate suggests that her identifies the external carotid artery branch supplying
headaches were more likely to be migraine than the anastomosis. The yellow arrow identifies the
craniotomy defect.
moyamoya-related symptoms.
Case 8-3
A 12-year-old girl presented with a 2-day history of headache. She became difficult to awaken and then
appeared disoriented. She was noted to have left-sided facial droop, drooling, and numbness as well
as weakness in her left arm and leg. Brain MRI showed an acute infarction in the right basal ganglia
(Figure 8-3A). Further history revealed that she had been started on an oral contraceptive 10 days
earlier. Family history was notable for deep venous thrombosis in the paternal grandmother when
she was in her forties; there was no family history of strokes or clotting disorders. Evaluation for
thrombophilia and an echocardiogram were normal. Antinuclear antibody was slightly elevated but
was considered a nonspecific finding. A magnetic resonance angiogram (MRA) showed arterial stenosis
within the proximal M1 segment of the right middle cerebral artery, confirmed by a catheter angiogram
(Figure 8-3B). She was treated with aspirin.
She was readmitted 5 times soon after initial presentation for recurring right frontal headache,
transient unsteadiness, or recurrence of the left-sided face and arm weakness coupled with intermittent
paresthesia and numbness. Each episode cleared within 24 hours, and no new diffusion changes were
noted on subsequent MRIs. In between these episodes, her neurologic examination was notable only for
stable mild weakness of her left foot extensors.
Since clinical suspicion was that the events reflected recurrent hemispheric TIAs, dipyridamole was
added to the aspirin. Angioplasty and bypass were considered but eventually not recommended. A
single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) perfusion scan showed no areas of reversible
hypoperfusion, and her MRA remained stable 5 months after initial presentation. She was treated with
topiramate and the episodes of headache and left-sided sensory symptoms stopped, although mild
headaches continued 3 to 4 times per week and she had a severe activity-limiting headache 2 to 3 times
per month. About 3 years after original presentation, she developed severe depression requiring
treatment but eventually responded to antidepressants and counseling. A follow-up MRA 5 years after
her incident stroke showed complete occlusion of the original focal stenosis at the mid right M1
segment (Figure 8-3C). The distal M1 segment beyond the stenosis was reconstituted by an inferior
collateral loop that had evolved.
Continued on page 174
FIGURE 8-3 Imaging of the patient in Case 8-3. A, Diffusion-weighted MRI sequence
demonstrates the subcortical location of the original infarction in the right basal
ganglia. B, Intracranial magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) demonstrates an
area of focal signal abnormality in the proximal right middle cerebral artery consistent with
focal stenosis (arrow). C, Intracranial MRA demonstrates absence of flow in the proximal right
middle cerebral artery suggestive of complete occlusion with reconstitution of the distal
segments from a collateral vessel (red arrow).
Comment. This case illustrates the focal nonatherosclerotic arteriopathy that can occur in children.
The patient did not have risk factors for moyamoya syndrome. The vasculopathy did not progress to a
moyamoya type, but the focal stenosis eventually progressed to become complete. This case also illustrates
that behavior/mood complications can occur in children and adolescents, just as in young adults.
(ie, idiopathic stroke). The duration of dren who have had stroke due to sickle
antithrombotic treatment in these cell disease, long-term transfusion ther-
children is uncertain, although a small apy is necessary to reduce recurrence;
study found no recurrence after 2 years stopping long-term transfusion therapy
following idiopathic stroke without results in an increased risk of stroke
arteriopathy.57 Children with cardiac recurrence.58 If the stroke occurred in
disease who have potential for further association with an acute provocation,
cardioembolism should be treated with such as central nervous system infec-
an antithrombotic agent until the risk tion, cardiac surgery/catheterization,
for embolism has resolved.44 For chil- or traumatic fat embolism, long-term
KEY POINTS
h Interest is growing in and cognitive outcomes.61 Total IQ for of a poorer mRS score. Poststroke epi-
the outcome of young the entire stroke group was not signif- lepsy occurred in 16% of survivors, and
adults who have had icantly different from population epilepsy was significantly associated
stroke, but the number norms; however, distinct subgroups with a poorer mRS score.65 The inves-
of studies with had significantly lower IQs. Total IQ tigators assessed subjective reports of
long-term follow-up is was significantly lower in children who memory and executive function impair-
relatively small. had more severe neurologic impair- ment in the survivors and compared
h A Dutch study of ment, poorer function as measured by them with objective measures of these
outcomes 9 years after a modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score of cognitive functions.66 Stroke survivors
the incident stroke 2 or more, or acute seizures with the reported subjective memory (86%) and
found that 10% of incident stroke or poststroke epilepsy. executive function (67%) impairments
young adult ischemic In specific cognitive domains, children at rates significantly greater than in
stroke survivors were who had infarcts involving both cortical stroke-free controls, but the magnitude
functioning at a and subcortical regions had signifi- of these self-reported impairments did
modified Rankin Scale
cantly lower verbal IQ and poorer work- not correlate with the magnitude of
score of 3 to 5 and 27%
ing memory and performance speed. objective measures of memory or exec-
were dead. As a group,
stroke survivors
Working memory and processing speed utive function. As a group, however,
performed worse than were significantly poorer in children stroke survivors performed worse than
controls in objective who had more severe neurologic im- controls in objective measures of pro-
measures of processing pairment or poorer mRS scores. cessing speed, working and immediate
speed, working and Our own work is consistent with memory, delayed memory, attention,
immediate memory, this finding.62 In a case-control study and executive function.67 When cog-
delayed memory, of children who had stroke compared nitive impairment was compared with
attention, and executive with controls, most of the children who mRS score, only impaired working
function. Depressive had stroke had mild neurologic deficits. memory was associated with poorer
symptoms were present Greater neurologic impairment corre- mRS scores.68
in 16% of men and
lated with lower total IQ and reduced In this same cohort, depression and
23% of women,
processing speed, adaptive behavior, anxiety occurred in a significant pro-
compared with 6% in
controls. Anxiety was
and social participation. In summary, portion of survivors. Depressive symp-
present in 15% of men while childhood stroke survivors typi- toms were present in 16% of men and
and 29% of women, cally have normal cognitive function, cer- 23% of women, compared with 6% in
compared with 12% tain subgroups will be at risk for greater controls.69 Anxiety was present in 15%
of controls. cognitive impairment, and physicians of men and 29% of women, compared
should anticipate the need for greater with 12% of controls. Lower educa-
assistance in these subgroups.63 tional level and unemployment were
Interest is growing in the outcome significantly associated with depressive
of young adults who have had stroke, symptoms and anxiety. Stroke survivors
but the number of studies with long- reported higher levels of fatigue (41%)
term follow-up is relatively small. One when compared with controls (18%);
large prospective Dutch study exam- fatigue was significantly associated with
ined a number of outcomes 9 years poorer functional outcome on the mRS.70
after the incident stroke in individuals When survivors of ischemic and hem-
aged 18 to 50 years. These investiga- orrhagic stroke (89% were ischemic
tors found that 10% of ischemic stroke strokes) were compared with the gen-
survivors functioned at an mRS score eral Dutch population regarding partial
of 3 to 5 and 27% were dead.64 Greater or full unemployment, 26% to 33% of
age and higher National Institutes of men and women 34 to 54 years of age
Health Stroke Scale scores at stroke were unemployed, compared with 5%
onset were associated with greater odds to 9% of the general population.71
176 ContinuumJournal.com February 2017
13. Mallick AA, Ganesan V, Kirkham FJ, et al. 24. Martinez-Biarge M, Cheong JL,
Childhood arterial ischaemic stroke incidence, Diez-Sebastian J, et al. Risk factors for
presenting features, and risk factors: a neonatal arterial ischemic stroke: the
prospective population-based study. Lancet importance of the intrapartum period.
Neurol 2014;13(1):35Y43. doi:10.1016/ J Pediatr 2016;10(173):62.e1Y68.e1.
S1474-4422(13)70290-4. doi:10.1016/j.jpeds.2016.02.064.
14. Shellhaas RA, Smith SE, O’Tool E, et al. Mimics 25. Andrew ME, Monagle P, deVeber G, Chan AK.
of childhood stroke: characteristics of a Thromboembolic disease and antithrombotic
prospective cohort. Pediatrics 2006;118(2): therapy in newborns. Hematology Am Soc
704Y709. doi:10.1016/S0271-7964(08)70686-4. Hematol Educ Program 2001:358Y374.
15. Mackay MT, Chua ZK, Lee M, et al. Stroke doi:10.1182/asheducation-2001.1.358.
and nonstroke brain attacks in children. 26. Nelson KB. Perinatal ischemic stroke. Stroke
Neurology 2014;82(16):1434Y1440. 2007;38(2 suppl):742Y745. doi:10.1161/
doi:10.1212/WNL.0000000000000343. 01.STR.0000247921.97794.5e.
16. Hand PJ, Kwan J, Lindley RI, et al. 27. Fullerton HJ, Wintermark M, Hills NK, et al.
Distinguishing between stroke and mimic at Risk of recurrent arterial ischemic stroke in
the bedside: the brain attack study. Stroke childhood: a prospective international study.
2006;37(3):769Y775. doi:10.1161/01.STR. Stroke 2016;47(1):53Y59. doi:10.1161/
0000204041.13466.4c. STROKEAHA.115.011173.
17. Neville K, Lo W. Sensitivity and specificity 28. Kirton A, Armstrong-Wells J, Chang T, et al.
of an adult stroke screening tool in Symptomatic neonatal arterial ischemic
childhood ischemic stroke. Pediatr stroke: the International Pediatric Stroke
Neurol 2016;58:53Y56. doi:10.1016/ Study. Pediatrics 2011;128(6):e1402Ye1410.
j.pediatrneurol.2016.02.001. doi:10.1542/peds.2011-1148.
18. Edlow JA, Selim MH. Atypical presentations 29. Putaala J, Haapaniemi E, Metso AJ, et al.
of acute cerebrovascular syndromes. Recurrent ischemic events in young adults
Lancet Neurol 2011;10(6):550Y560. after first-ever ischemic stroke. Ann Neurol
doi:10.1016/S1474-4422(11)70069-2. 2010;68(5):661Y671. doi:10.1002/ana.22091.
19. Wintermark M, Hills NK, deVeber GA, et al. 30. Rutten-Jacobs LC, Arntz RM, Maaijwee NA,
Arteriopathy diagnosis in childhood arterial et al. Long-term mortality after stroke
ischemic stroke: results of the vascular effects among adults aged 18 to 50 years. JAMA
of infection in pediatric stroke study. Stroke 2013;309(11):1136Y1144. doi:10.1001/
2014;45(12):3597Y3605. doi:10.1161/ jama.2013.842.
STROKEAHA.114.007404.
31. Moharir M, Deveber G. Pediatric arterial
20. Olasinska-Wisniewska A, Mularek-Kubzdela T, ischemic stroke. Continuum (Minneap Minn)
Grajek S, et al. Impact of atrial remodeling on 2014;20(2 Cerebrovascular Disease):
heart rhythm after radiofrequency ablation 370Y386. doi:10.1212/01.CON.
and mitral valve operations. Ann Thorac Surg 0000446107.74796.a0.
2012;93(5):1449Y1455. doi:10.1016/ 32. Amlie-Lefond C, Sébire G, Fullerton HJ. Recent
j.athoracsur.2011.12.034. developments in childhood arterial ischaemic
21. von Sarnowski B, Putaala J, Grittner U, et al. stroke. Lancet Neurol 2008;7(5):425Y435.
Lifestyle risk factors for ischemic stroke and doi:10.1016/S1474-4422(08)70086-3.
transient ischemic attack in young adults in 33. Rivkin MJ, Bernard TJ, Dowling MM,
the Stroke in Young Fabry Patients study. Amlie-Lefond C. Guidelines for urgent
Stroke 2013;44(1):119Y125. doi:10.1161/ management of stroke in children. Pediatr
STROKEAHA.112.665190. Neurol 2016;56:8Y17. doi:10.1016/
j.pediatrneurol.2016.01.016.
22. Yesilot Barlas N, Putaala J, Waje-Andreassen U,
et al. Etiology of first-ever ischaemic stroke 34. Raffini L, Thornburg C. Testing children
in European young adults: the 15 cities young for inherited thrombophilia: more
stroke study. Eur J Neurol 2013;20(11): questions than answers. Br J Haematol
1431Y1439. doi:10.1111/ene.12228. 2009;147(3):277Y288. doi:10.1111/
j.1365-2141.2009.07820.x.
23. Raju TN, Nelson KB, Ferriero D, et al.
Ischemic perinatal stroke: summary 35. Chan AK, deVeber G. Prothrombotic
of a workshop sponsored by the disorders and ischemic stroke in children.
National Institute of Child Health and Semin Pediatr Neurol 2000;7(4):301Y308.
Human Development and the doi:10.1053/spen.2000.20075.
National Institute of Neurological Disorders 36. Monagle P, Chan AK. Pediatric edition
and Stroke. Pediatrics 2007;120(3):609Y616. thrombosis research. Thromb Res 2006;118(1):
doi:10.1542/peds.2007-0336. 1Y2. doi:10.1016/j.thromres.2005.09.011.
58. Adams RJ, Brambilla D, Optimizing Primary 65. Arntz R, Rutten-Jacobs L, Maaijwee N, et al.
Stroke Prevention in Sickle Cell Anemia Post-stroke epilepsy in young adults: a
(STOP 2) Trial Investigators. Discontinuing long-term follow-up study. PLoS One
prophylactic transfusions used to prevent 2013;8(2):e55498. doi:10.1371/
stroke in sickle cell disease. N Engl J Med journal.pone.0055498.
2005;353(26):2769Y2778. doi:10.1056/ 66. Maaijwee NA, Schaapsmeerders P,
NEJMoa050460. Rutten-Jacobs LC, et al. Subjective cognitive
59. Ricci D, Mercuri E, Barnett A, et al. Cognitive failures after stroke in young adults:
outcome at early school age in term-born prevalent but not related to cognitive
children with perinatally acquired middle impairment. J Neurol 2014;261(7):1300Y1308.
cerebral artery territory infarction. Stroke doi:10.1007/s00415-014-7346-3.
2008;39(2):403Y410. doi:10.1161/ 67. Schaapsmeerders P, Maaijwee NA,
STROKEAHA.107.489831. van Dijk EJ, et al. Long-term cognitive
60. Goeggel Simonetti B, Cavelti A, Arnold M, et al. impairment after first-ever ischemic
Long-term outcome after arterial ischemic stroke in young adults. Stroke
stroke in children and young adults. 2013;44(6):1621Y1628. doi:10.1161/
Neurology 2015;84(19):1941Y1947. STROKEAHA.111.000792.
doi:10.1212/WNL.0000000000001555. 68. Synhaeve NE, Schaapsmeerders P, Arntz RM,
61. Studer M, Boltshauser E, Capone Mori A, et al. Cognitive performance and poor
et al. Factors affecting cognitive outcome long-term functional outcome after young
in early pediatric stroke. Neurology 2014; stroke. Neurology 2015;85(9):776Y782.
82(9):784Y792. doi:10.1212/WNL. doi:10.1212/WNL.0000000000001882.
0000000000000162. 69. Maaijwee NA, Tendolkar I, Rutten-Jacobs LC,
62. Lo W, Gordon AL, Hajek C, et al. Pediatric et al. Long-term depressive symptoms
stroke outcome measure: predictor of multiple and anxiety after transient ischaemic attack
impairments in childhood stroke. J Child Neurol or ischaemic stroke in young adults.
2014;29(11):1524Y1530. doi:10.1177/ Eur J Neurol 2016;23(8):1262Y1268.
0883073813503186. doi:10.1111/ene.13009.
63. Greenham M, Gordon A, Anderson V, 70. Maaijwee NA, Arntz RM, Rutten-Jacobs LC,
Mackay MT. Outcome in childhood stroke. et al. Post-stroke fatigue and its association
Stroke 2016;47(4):1159Y1164. doi:10.1161/ with poor functional outcome after stroke
STROKEAHA.115.011622. in young adults. J Neurol Neurosurg
64. Synhaeve NE, Arntz RM, Maaijwee NA, et al. Psychiatry 2015;86(10):1120Y1126.
Poor long-term functional outcome after doi:10.1136/jnnp-2014-308784.
stroke among adults aged 18 to 50 years: 71. Maaijwee NA, Rutten-Jacobs LC, Arntz RM,
Follow-Up of Transient Ischemic Attack and et al. Long-term increased risk of
Stroke Patients and Unelucidated Risk Factor unemployment after young stroke: a
Evaluation (FUTURE) study. Stroke 2014; long-term follow-up study. Neurology
45(4):1157Y1160. doi:10.1161/ 2014;83(13):1132Y1138. doi:10.1212/
STROKEAHA.113.004411. WNL.0000000000000817.
Management of
Address correspondence to
Dr Kelly Flemming, Mayo Clinic,
200 First St SW, Rochester,
MN 55905-0001,
Cerebrovascular Products/Investigational
Use Disclosure: Drs Flemming
and Lanzino discuss the
Malformations
unlabeled/investigational
use of statins and fasudil
for the treatment of
cavernous malformation.
Kelly D. Flemming, MD; Giuseppe Lanzino, MD * 2017 American Academy
of Neurology.
ABSTRACT
Purpose of Review: Unruptured intracranial aneurysms and vascular malformations
are detected more frequently because of the increased use and availability of brain
imaging. Management of these entities requires knowledge of which patients are
at high risk for hemorrhage and what treatment options are available. This article
summarizes the epidemiology, natural history, and management strategies for
unruptured intracranial aneurysms, arteriovenous malformations, cavernous
malformations, developmental venous anomalies, and capillary telangiectasias.
Recent Findings: Pooled cohort studies and meta-analyses have improved the ability
to predict hemorrhage for each vascular abnormality. Scores and tools have been
developed to aid the practitioner in predicting hemorrhage risk for unruptured
intracranial aneurysms. Advances in endovascular techniques for unruptured intracra-
nial aneurysms have improved the ability to treat difficult wide-necked aneurysms.
Summary: Unruptured intracranial aneurysms are a common incidental finding. The
PHASES (population, hypertension, age, size of aneurysm, earlier subarachnoid
hemorrhage from another aneurysm, site of aneurysm) score and Unruptured Intra-
cranial Aneurysm Treatment Score may be useful tools for predicting natural history
and treatment recommendations. The overall risk of hemorrhage for both arteriove-
nous malformations and cavernous malformations is about 2% to 4% per year.
With both of these entities, prior hemorrhage predicts future hemorrhage. In addi-
tion, other select patient and radiologic factors influence risk of hemorrhage. The
risk of future hemorrhage should be compared to the risk of treatment. Develop-
mental venous anomalies and capillary telangiectasias are largely benign entities and
rarely symptomatic.
Developmental
Unruptured Arteriovenous Cavernous Venous Capillary
Aneurysm Malformation Malformation Anomaly Telangiectasia
Etiology Acquired Probably acquired Acquired, Congenital Possibly
sporadic (80%) congenital
Familial (20%) Acquired after
(autosomal brain radiation
dominant) (in some)
b Risk Factors
Nonmodifiable
Female sex
Increasing age
Family history of unruptured intracranial aneurysm or subarachnoid
hemorrhage in first-degree relatives
Modifiable
Hypertension
Cigarette smoking
Possibly excess alcohol use
b Rare Diseases/Conditions Associated With Increased Risk of Aneurysm Formation
Autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease
Ehlers-Danlos syndrome type IV
Marfan syndrome
Coarctation of the aorta
Bicuspid aortic valve
Pseudoxanthoma elasticum
Hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia
Neurofibromatosis type 1
!1-Antitrypsin deficiency
Fibromuscular dysplasia
Pheochromocytoma
Klinefelter syndrome
Tuberous sclerosis
Noonan syndrome
!-D-Glucosidase deficiency
Microcephalic osteodysplastic primordial dwarfism
Intracranial arteriovenous malformation
KEY POINT
h Risk factors for unruptured TABLE 9-3 Five-Year Cumulative Rupture Rates According to Size
intracranial aneurysms and Location of Unruptured Aneurysma
include size and location
(posterior circulation, Size
posterior communicating
G7 mm G7 mm
artery, anterior Location Group 1b Group 2c 7Y12 mm 13Y24 mm 25 mm
communicating artery),
Cavernous carotid 0 0 0 3.0% 6.4%
growth, and symptoms
artery (n = 210)
not due to rupture.
AC/MC/IC (n = 1037) 0 1.5% 2.6% 14.5% 40%
Post-P comm (n = 445) 2.5% 3.4% 14.5% 18.4% 50%
AC = anterior communicating or anterior cerebral artery; IC = internal carotid artery (not cavernous
carotid artery); MC = middle cerebral artery; Post-P comm = vertebrobasilar, posterior cerebral
arterial system, or the posterior communicating artery.
a
Reprinted with permission from Wiebers DO, Lancet.4 B 2003 Elsevier. thelancet.com/journals/
lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(03)13860-3/abstract.
b
Patients with no prior history of subarachnoid hemorrhage.
c
Patients with a prior history of subarachnoid hemorrhage from another aneurysm.
suggest size and location as important Putting all the data together, the
factors. The Familial Intracranial Aneu- most impactful risk factors for aneu-
rysm study (FIA) followed 113 patients rysm rupture are size (greater risk with
with 148 familial unruptured intracra- increasing size), location (posterior cir-
nial aneurysms. In this study, the rate culation, posterior communicating, and
of rupture was approximately 1.2 per anterior communicating), and symp-
100 patients, higher than the nonfa- toms not due to rupture (Table 9-4).
milial rates from the ISUIA study.6 Other risk factors that may play a role
Given the small number of patients are also listed in Table 9-4. Aneurysmal
and outcome events as well as a short growth found on surveillance imaging
follow-up length, a definitive conclusion raises a concern for potential future
as to whether family history raises risk rupture as well. Risk factors for aneu-
was not possible. rysm growth include female sex, ciga-
A pooled analysis of individual data rette smoking, younger age, excessive
from six prospective cohort studies alcohol use, aneurysm location, multi-
yielded additional information on rup- plicity of aneurysms, history of stroke,
ture risk and risk factors. In this anal- and history of transient ischemic attack.
ysis, 8382 patients were followed for Emerging aneurysm vessel wall imaging
29,166 person-years.7 The overall 5-year techniques may be a future aid for the
risk of aneurysm rupture was 3.4%. Risk clinician in risk stratification for rupture.8
factors for rupture included age, hyper-
tension, history of SAH, aneurysm size Management and Treatment
and location, and country of origin of Management decisions for unruptured
the patient. Together, these risk factors intracranial aneurysms include: (1)
were modeled into an easy-to-use scor- when to screen a patient for an un-
ing system, the PHASES (population, hy- ruptured intracranial aneurysm; (2)
pertension, age, size of aneurysm, earlier whether a patient undergoes observa-
SAH from another aneurysm, site of tion versus treatment; (3) if treatment is
aneurysm) score, to aid in predicting selected, the type of treatment (surgical
rupture risk in individuals (Figure 9-1). or endovascular); (4) what type of
KEY POINT
follow-up or surveillance is necessary; tomatic intracranial aneurysms, such as h Screening for unruptured
and (5) how to treat concurrent disease those with isolated cranial nerve palsy. intracranial aneurysms is
or comorbidities. Guidelines for the Treatment of an incidental asymptomatic recommended for those
management and treatment of unrup- unruptured intracranial aneurysm re- with two or more
tured intracranial aneurysms were pub- quires careful thought about the natural first-degree relatives
lished by the American Heart/Stroke history of that individual aneurysm com- with unruptured
Association in 2015.1 pared to the risk of treatment of the intracranial aneurysms
Screening. Patients with two or aneurysm.1,9 Patient factors such as age, or aneurysmal
more family members with unruptured medical history, history of SAH, life ex- subarachnoid
intracranial aneurysms or SAHs should pectancy, and family history should be hemorrhages.
be considered for screening with either considered. The size, location, growth,
CTA or MRA. This is especially important and morphologic characteristics of the
if the patient also has a history of hyper- aneurysm and whether the patient has
tension or tobacco use or is female.1 symptoms not due to rupture should
Other rare, but high-risk, groups that may also be considered. Patients selected for
require screening include patients with potential treatment should be seen by a
autosomal dominant polycystic kidney vascular neurosurgeon with expertise
disease, especially if they have a family in unruptured intracranial aneurysms
history of unruptured intracranial aneu- at a high-volume institution. In addition,
rysms, and patients with coarctation of the patient’s preference and concerns
the aorta or microcephalic osteo- should be considered.
dysplastic primordial dwarfism. Since Two scores may be useful for aiding
many unruptured intracranial aneu- the practitioner in decisions regarding
rysms do not need invasive treatment, treatment. One is the PHASES score (dis-
patients should receive counseling cussed previously). This score allows
about this before undergoing screening. prediction of natural history that can be
Determining whether to treat an weighed against the risk of treatment
unruptured intracranial aneurysm. (Case 9-1). The second scoring system
Treatment is generally favored in symp- is the Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysm
KEY POINT
h The natural history of clinical decision making in patients with
the unruptured TABLE 9-4 Risk Factors for unruptured intracranial aneurysms.
Intracranial Aneurysm Using the Delphi Method (a structured
intracranial aneurysm
Growth and Rupture
must be compared to technique in which experts approach
the individual treatment and answer specific well-defined ques-
b Risk Factors for Aneurysm
risk to make a tions in two or more rounds based on
Growth
determination on discussion and presentation of prior
whether treatment is Female sex research), investigators found that
recommended. The Cigarette smoking there was excellent consensus among
Unruptured Intracranial experts using this method.
Aneurysm Treatment Younger age
Treatment of unruptured intra-
Score may aid Excessive alcohol use cranial aneurysms. While treatment
the practitioner.
Aneurysm location recommendations for unruptured in-
Multiplicity of aneurysms tracranial aneurysms are beyond the
scope of this article, a few statements
History of stroke
can be made about the types of treat-
History of transient ischemic ments offered for unruptured intracranial
attack aneurysms. Treatment generally includes
Aneurysm size surgical and endovascular options.
b Risk Factors for Aneurysm
Surgical clipping of aneurysms has
Rupture been the mainstay of aneurysm treat-
ment for decades. In a meta-analysis of
Strongest risk factors
patients undergoing surgery for any
Size unruptured intracranial aneurysm, the
Location major morbidity rate was approximately
4% and the mortality rate was 1%.11 In
Symptoms not due to
rupture data from the ISUIA treated arm, the
morbidity rate, which included cogni-
Additional potential risk
tive impairment, was higher (more than
factors
10%). In that study, age was a key pre-
Younger age (G50 years) dictor of surgical outcome.3,4
Cigarette smoking Endovascular options generally in-
Hypertension
clude standard coiling but also can
include balloon and stent-assisted
Aneurysmal growth coiling and flow diversion, and parent
Morphology artery sacrifice with or without bypass.
Female sex Data on endovascular treatment come
from older studies and suggest a
Prior subarachnoid
combined morbidity/mortality rate of
hemorrhage
8% to 9%. This technology and user
Family history of expertise continues to evolve with
subarachnoid hemorrhage
time. Endovascular flow diversion for
Finnish or Japanese the treatment of aneurysms is a new
heritage and evolving option (Figure 9-3). Low-
porosity stent devices divert blood flow
in the usual direction and away from
Treatment Score (UIATS) (Figure 9-2).10 the aneurysmal wall. Ultimately, the
This scoring system was developed by aneurysm involutes, and the flow diverter
69 experts in the field to quantify provides a scaffold for intimal growth.
188 ContinuumJournal.com February 2017
KEY POINT
Treatment (ISAT) suggest that the Treatment of concurrent disease
h Surveillance magnetic
endovascular procedural risk is less and lifestyle restrictions. Patients with
resonance angiography
than the surgical risk in patients with unruptured intracranial aneurysms or CT angiography is
ruptured intracranial aneurysms in often have other comorbidities that re- recommended for
which either treatment was felt to be quire treatment. Practitioners caring patients with an
a potential option.12 Overall, endovas- for patients with aneurysms may be unruptured intracranial
cular treatment may have lower peri- asked questions by primary care phy- aneurysm undergoing
procedural morbidity or mortality; sicians or obstetricians regarding par- observation.
however, surgical clipping has a lower ticular comorbidities and treatment.
rate of aneurysm remnant or aneu- Most recommendations come from
rysm recurrence. expert opinion as few data may exist
Follow-up surveillance. Surveil- on individual topics. In general, no
lance imaging with MRA or CTA is often evidence exists to indicate that patients
recommended in patients with an with stable unruptured intracranial an-
unruptured intracranial aneurysm who eurysms should restrict their level and
will undergo observation. If frequent type of activity in any way or form. Sim-
surveillance is necessary, MRA may be ilarly, these patients can undergo any
favored to avoid ongoing radiation ex- surgical procedure and take any indi-
posure. Surveillance allows the practi- cated medication without any particu-
tioner to determine if an aneurysm has lar restriction as no evidence exists to
grown, which may prompt consider- the contrary.
ation of treatment. In one study, the Some patients with unruptured in-
rate of growth was 6.9% over 4 years in tracranial aneurysms have a concomi-
patients with aneurysms less 8 mm in tant illness requiring anticoagulation
size, 25% in those with aneurysms (eg, pulmonary embolus, atrial fibrilla-
8 mm to 12 mm in size, and 83% in pa- tion). Anticoagulation does not pre-
tients with aneurysms larger than 12 mm. cipitate hemorrhage of an unruptured
While no exact studies exist to guide the intracranial aneurysm; however, if a
intervals of surveillance, the first repeat patient does have an aneurysmal hem-
image is recommended 6 to 12 months orrhage while on anticoagulation, the
after the initial discovery. Thereafter, morbidity/mortality is higher. Thus,
the interval depends on patient age the risk-benefit ratio needs to be con-
and aneurysm size and location. sidered. If patient had a small (less than
Presentation
AVMs may be an incidental finding or
patients may present with neurologic
FIGURE 9-4 Arteriovenous malformation. symptoms and deficits due to hemor-
T2-weighted MRI of the
brain demonstrates multiple rhagic or nonhemorrhagic etiologies.
flow voids in the right hemisphere, suggestive With the increasing use of MRI, the
of a large arteriovenous malformation.
number of asymptomatic incidentally
discovered AVMs has increased. Ap-
the gold standard for assessing the proximately 10% to 20% of AVMs are
angioarchitecture of these lesions. On discovered as incidental findings.
cerebral arteriography, parenchymal If symptomatic, the most common
AVMs appear as tightly packed masses presentation is that of hemorrhage (ap-
of enlarged feeding arteries and dilated proximately 40% to 60% of patients).
tortuous veins with little or no interven- Most commonly, hemorrhage is within
ing parenchyma within the nidus. Arte- the brain parenchyma; however, sub-
riovenous shunting with abnormal early arachnoid or intraventricular bleeding
filling of veins that drain the lesion is can occur. Patients presenting with
characteristic of AVMs. Cerebral angiog- hemorrhage are more likely to have an
raphy is essential prior to determination AVM that is small (less than 3 cm) and in
of treatment to carefully assess the size a deep location and to have exclusive
of the AVM, determine if any nidal deep venous drainage. Approximately
aneurysms or feeding artery aneurysms 10% to 30% of patients present with
exist, establish eloquent location, and seizures. Patients presenting with sei-
determine feeding and draining vessels. zures have a supratentorial AVM, often
in a frontal or temporal location. Sei-
Epidemiology zures may be simple or partial complex
The estimated prevalence of AVMs is and may or may not generalize.
approximately 0.1% to 0.2%.14 Patients Less commonly, patients will initially
are typically diagnosed between 20 and have transient, permanent, or progres-
40 years of age. Nearly 40% of intra- sive focal neurologic deficits not due to
cerebral hemorrhage in patients 15 to hemorrhage or seizure. Mechanisms for
45 years of age is due to an AVM. Most this type of presentation may include
studies report an equal or slight male steal phenomena (ischemia due to a
preponderance in patients with AVMs. high-flow AVM “stealing” blood away
Although AVMs have been tradi- from local tissue), recurrent small
Continuum (Minneap Minn) 2017;23(1):181–210 ContinuumJournal.com 193
KEY POINTS
h Prior hemorrhage hemorrhages, local pressure or mass tion is often used as an adjunct treatment
increases the risk for effect from the AVM, or hydrocephalus. with either surgical resection or radio-
recurrent hemorrhage surgery. In some selected cases (often
Natural History small AVMs with a single draining vein),
in patients with
arteriovenous Hemorrhage due to AVM carries high embolization may be curative. Rec-
malformation. morbidity and mortality. Several natu- ommendations for management come
h Treatment for ral history studies, meta-analyses, and from natural history cohorts, a single
arteriovenous a single clinical trial have attempted to clinical trial, surgical series, and the
malformation depends estimate the risk of bleeding in AVMs American Heart Association Guide-
on patient factors to aid in management decisions about lines.18 Medical management for pa-
(presence of symptoms/ which patients require treatment. The tients with AVMs includes counseling
hemorrhage, age of overall risk of hemorrhage in patients regarding the natural history risk, treat-
patient, comorbidities) with AVMs has been estimated to be ing seizures associated with the AVM,
and angiographic factors 2% to 4% per year.15,16 and managing comorbidities and other
(location of feeding and An individual’s risk of rupture de- health conditions.
draining vessels, pends on several factors; prior hemor- Surgery can definitively remove
eloquence of the brain,
rhage is the most consistent risk factor AVMs and thereby eliminate the risk of
presence of feeding
for future hemorrhage.16 In patients future hemorrhage. When technically
artery or nidal aneurysms,
size of nidus). with a prior history of hemorrhage, possible, this technique is preferred in
the risk of ever-recurrent hemorrhage patients who have hemorrhaged, given
h Options for treating
is up to 44%. Furthermore, in these pa- their risk of subsequent hemorrhage.
an arteriovenous
malformation to reduce
tients, the risk of subsequent hemor- The Spetzler-Martin AVM grading system
hemorrhage risk or rhage is highest in the first year after is commonly used to assess surgical risk
seizures include surgery initial hemorrhage. One study found (Table 9-5 and Table 9-6).19 Surgical
or stereotactic that the bleeding rate in those who risk increases with higher Spetzler-
radiosurgery. presented with hemorrhage initially was Martin grade. In patients in whom
Endovascular higher in the first year (15.4%), falling surgery is performed because of intrac-
embolization is a to 5.3% in the next 4 years and 1.7% table seizures, up to 60% to 80% of
common adjunctive after 5 years.17 Radiologic risk factors patients may become seizure free 2 to
procedure. include deep location, exclusive deep 3 years postsurgery.
h The Spetzler-Martin venous drainage, and the presence of Stereotactic radiosurgery is also a con-
arteriovenous an associated aneurysm. sideration for the treatment of AVMs. It
malformation grading takes approximately 2 to 3 years for an
system can aid in Management and Treatment AVM to involute and obliterate by this
determining surgical risk. The natural history for an individual technique, thus the patient remains at
must be carefully weighed against the risk for hemorrhage during that time
risk of intervention. Consultations with frame. For this reason, surgery is gen-
cerebrovascular neurologists, vascular erally preferred if a patient has already
neurosurgeons, and interventionalists hemorrhaged. Although heavily de-
and radiosurgeons with expertise in bated, best evidence suggests that
AVM management should be sought. stereotactic radiosurgery neither in-
Patient preference, clinical factors, radio- creases nor decreases the risk of
logic factors, and neurosurgical exper- hemorrhage during the latency period
tise play a role in selecting the most between treatment and obliteration.
appropriate treatment for an individual. The Pollock-Flickinger score was
In general, treatment options to reduce developed to aid the practitioner in
the risk of hemorrhage from an AVM selecting patients with AVMs for stereo-
include surgical resection or stereotac- tactic radiosurgery (Table 9-7).20 Ste-
tic radiosurgery. Endovascular emboliza- reotactic radiosurgery is most successful
194 ContinuumJournal.com February 2017
in patients with small lesions. In patients radiosurgery (to reduce the size of the
with AVMs smaller than 3 cm, approxi- AVM); no evidence exists that this ap-
mately 80% of patients will have com- proach is effective, and many studies
plete obliteration of the AVM with have actually demonstrated worse out-
radiosurgery after 2 to 3 years. Larger comes after radiosurgery with previ-
AVMs may have lower obliteration rates ously embolized AVMs. Embolization is
or require staged radiosurgery. Patients best performed by an interventionalist
with a large and diffuse AVM nidus are or surgeon with expertise in AVM treat-
less favorable candidates for stereotac- ment as careful selection of feeding
tic radiosurgery. Risk of subsequent branches is necessary to avoid occluding
radiation necrosis is approximately 1% branches that also feed normal brain.
to 3% and depends on the dose deliv- Only one clinical trial has been
ered and the volume treated. In patients performed to evaluate the safety and
who undergo radiosurgery and have had effectiveness of treating unruptured
seizures, seizure freedom is achieved in AVMs.21 This study was halted early
50% to 60%, depending on the size of for safety concerns. A Randomized
the AVM and other characteristics. Trial of Unruptured Brain Arteriovenous
Endovascular embolization is a com- Malformations (ARUBA) randomly
mon adjunct to surgical treatment of assigned patients with unruptured AVMs
AVMs and may be curative in isolation in to medical versus interventional (sur-
less than 5% of patients. Embolization gery, radiation therapy, or endovascular
reduces the nidus size and vascularity therapy) treatment. A total of 223
of the AVM, potentially decreasing sur- patients were followed for a mean
gical complications in complex AVMs. 33 months. The primary end point of
Preoperative embolization is rarely used death or symptomatic stroke was
in many centers prior to stereotactic higher in the intervention group as
Neurologic Outcome
Worse or Dead Improved or Unchanged
N % N %
Spetzler-Martin Grade
I 5 8.9 51 91.1
II 30 24.4 93 75.6
III 27 30.0 63 70.0
IV 9 31.0 20 69.0
V 2 100.0 0 0.0
Supplemental Grade
I 1 3.7 26 96.3
II 8 11.9 59 88.1
III 25 22.1 88 77.9
IV 32 40.5 47 59.5
V 7 50.0 7 50.0
Combined Grade
1 0 0.0 0 0.0
2 0 0.0 7 100.0
3 0 0.0 21 100.0
4 5 9.1 50 90.9
5 19 21.1 71 78.9
6 19 27.1 51 72.9
7 24 54.5 20 45.5
8 4 50.0 4 50.0
9 2 40.0 3 60.0
10 0 0.0 0 0.0
a
Reprinted with permission from Kim H, et al, Neurosurgery.19 B 2015 Congress of Neurological Surgeons.
journals.lww.com/neurosurgery/pages/articleviewer.aspx?year=2015&issue=01000&article=
00003&type=abstract.
Where:
Volume: in mL
Age: in years
Location: superficial (hemispheric/corpus
callosum/cerebellar) = 0; deep (basal
ganglia/thalamus/brainstem) = 1
Chance (%) of excellent AVM score e1.00: 89 (79Y94)
outcome with 95%
AVM score 1.01Y1.50: 70 (59Y79)
confidence interval
AVM score 1.51Y2.00: 64 (51Y75)
AVM score 92.00: 46 (33Y60)
Chance (%) of modified AVM score e1.00: 0 (0Y8)
Rankin Scale decline with
AVM score 1.01Y1.50: 13 (7Y22)
95% confidence interval
AVM score 1.51Y2.00: 20 (12Y32)
AVM score 92.00: 36 (24Y50)
a
Data from Pollock BE, Flickinger JC, Neurosurgery.20 journals.lww.com/neurosurgery/pages/
articleviewer.aspx?year=2008&issue=08000&article=00014&type=abstract.
FIGURE 9-5 Cavernous malformation. T2-weighted MRI of the brain (A) demonstrates a
right midbrain-thalamic cavernous malformation of the brain. Note the
reticulated popcorn appearance. The associated susceptibility-weighted
sequence (B) demonstrates the large midbrain-thalamic lesion but also shows numerous
hypointensities. This patient had the familial form of cavernous malformation.
78/9/632.short.
b
This table notes the risk as stratified by initial presenting symptoms and combined as a whole group during the specified yearly intervals.
KEY POINTS
h Surgical treatment is and down to 2% to 3% per year in lactic antiepileptic drug (AED) is
generally indicated in years 3 to 10.15 This temporal clustering recommended, even if the cavernous
patients with a of hemorrhages has been noted by malformation is in the temporal lobe.
symptomatic cavernous others. The declining rate of hemor- If, however, a patient has had a single
malformation in a rhage is important when comparing seizure, it is generally recommended
noneloquent area to the natural history of cavernous malfor- that the patient start an AED since the
reduce the risk of mations to that of treatment, includ- risk of a second seizure may be as high
hemorrhage or seizure ing radiation therapy. However, this as 94%. Approximately 60% of patients
due to the cavernous clustering effect has not been noted respond to a first AED. Early surgery
malformation. in all studies. may be considered to reduce the
h In patients with cavernous If patients have no seizures at diag- hemorrhage risk if the seizure was
malformations in nosis, the risk of future seizures is ap- actually caused by a hemorrhage or if
eloquent regions, proximately 1.5% to 3% per year.25 The it is felt that the patient may be poorly
surgery may be only established risk factors predict- compliant with medications.25 If a pa-
considered for a patient
ing development of seizures were mul- tient has breakthrough seizures despite
who has repeated
tiple cavernous malformations and adequate trials of AEDs, then surgery
hemorrhages and
increasing morbidity.
supratentorial location. could be considered to reduce the risk
of seizure and future hemorrhage.
Management and Treatment Surgery is generally considered in
Management of patients with cavern- patients with symptomatic surgically
ous malformations includes medical accessible lesions.31 If a cavernous mal-
management and surgical evaluation, formation is in an eloquent or deep
thus requiring a multidisciplinary team area (eg, thalamus, basal ganglia), sur-
of neurologists, neurosurgeons, and, gery would be considered in the setting
in some cases, geneticists. Management of recurrent hemorrhages or significant
is based on general recommenda- morbidity. The latter rationale is also
tions and expert opinion, as no clinical considered for brainstem cavernous
trials and few guidelines exist.27,28 The malformations. Some controversy exists
Cavernoma Alliance United Kingdom about this, and practice may vary. Some
published guidelines for the manage- brainstem cavernous malformations
ment of cavernous malformations in adjacent to the pial surface could be
adults in 2008. The ILAE has published removed after an initial hemorrhage.
a review and recommendations for man- In each individual, careful comparison
agement summary for seizures associ- of the risks of surgery versus the natural
ated with cavernous malformation. At history must be weighed (Case 9-2).
the time of this writing, the Angioma The risk of surgery depends on the
Alliance is updating guidelines pub- location of the cavernous malformation
lished previously in 2008.29 and the experience of the surgeon. In
Medical management for patients patients undergoing surgery for sei-
with cavernous malformations may in- zure, approximately 60% to 80% will
clude genetic counseling, managing sei- be seizure free at 1 to 2 years.25
zures if present, counseling on lifestyle Stereotactic radiosurgery is com-
and environmental risk factor modifica- monly used for dural arteriovenous
tion, managing comorbidities (eg, preg- fistulas and AVMs, but it is uncommonly
nancy, use of antithrombotics), and used for cavernous malformations. In
discussing natural history and individual many radiosurgery studies, none of
risks with the patient (Table 9-11). which have had a control arm, the risk
In patients with cavernous malfor- of hemorrhage is reduced at 2 to 3 years.
mations and no seizures, no prophy- However, a similar reduction in
202 ContinuumJournal.com February 2017
Components of
Management Comments
Patient Management Issues
Genetic counseling Consider in patients with multiple cavernous
malformations or a family history of cavernous
malformations
Genetic testing available for CCM1, CCM2, and CCM3a
Lifestyle modification Patients with cavernous malformations and seizures
should avoid lifestyle activities that may reduce seizure
threshold or potentially result in injury if a seizure occurs.
For example, lack of sleep, medication noncompliance,
or alcohol use may precipitate seizures. In addition,
caution in water activities is recommended.
Very limited data may suggest intense exercise or
binge alcohol use may increase risk of hemorrhage30;
other data do not support limiting activity
Medications While data do not suggest antithrombotics increase
the risk of hemorrhage, in general, they should be
avoided unless the risk outweighs the benefit
(compare the natural history to the risk of
condition requiring antithrombotic)
Avoid medications that lower seizure threshold if a
history of seizure disorder exists
Pregnancy Provide prepregnancy counseling
If seizure disorder is present, consider antiepileptic
drugs (AEDs) with lower teratogenic potential
Advise folate supplementation if patient is on seizure
medication during pregnancy
MRI, if needed, during pregnancy
Vaginal delivery is an acceptable mode of delivery unless
recent hemorrhage or neurologic deficits preclude it
Seizure disorder AED treatment is warranted after a single seizure
in the presence of a cavernous malformation
Interventional Therapy
Surgery Surgery should be considered in symptomatic patients
to reduce future hemorrhage rate and seizure risk
if in a noneloquent area
Surgery may be considered in symptomatic patients
in eloquent or deep areas if repeated hemorrhages
occur or if there is significant morbidity
Observation is generally recommended for
asymptomatic patients with cavernous malformations
Continued on page 204
Components of
Management Comments
Radiosurgery Radiosurgery is reserved for patients with
repeated hemorrhages in surgically inaccessible
areas if the risk of radiosurgery is less than
the expected morbidity from the cavernous
malformation
Emerging Therapies/Techniques
Medical Animal and in vitro models have explored
use of simvastatin, fasudil, vitamin D, and
sulindac in reducing leakiness of cavernous
malformations
Radiologic Quantitative susceptibility mapping and
dynamic contrast-enhanced quantitative
perfusion to assess leakiness of cavernous
malformation
MRI = magnetic resonance imaging.
a
Genetests.org; search term: cavernous malformation.
Case 9-2
A 34-year-old man presented with acute left hemiplegia and hemisensory
loss. CT and subsequent MRI of the brain demonstrated a cavernous
malformation in the right thalamocapsular region that had acutely
hemorrhaged.
Comment. The 5-year risk of recurrent hemorrhage in this patient may
be estimated to be close to 20%, which must be weighed against the risk
of surgery. In general, the risk of a persistent or worse deficit with surgery
of a cavernous malformation in the deep structures (eg, basal ganglia,
thalamus) is about 20% to 30%. Thus, in this situation, it is common to
observe and, if a second bleed occurs with increasing morbidity, again
consider the risks and benefits. While no guidelines exist on when to
reimage, a follow-up image could be considered in 1 to 3 months to ensure
the correct diagnosis and to determine if any change has occurred.
Annual surveillance can be considered, although if the patient remains
asymptomatic, no change in management would occur at that time. In this
particular case, observation was recommended due to the morbidity of
surgery with a cavernous malformation in this location. Physical and
occupational therapy were initiated.
KEY POINTS
h Developmental venous radiologically or surgically no other anomaly is causative. For example, is
anomalies rarely cause cause is identified. 32 a primary seizure disorder or other
symptoms, and Patients with developmental venous lesion responsible? Developmental ve-
surveillance imaging is anomalies may rarely be seen initially nous anomalies may cause seizure if
generally not indicated. with focal neurologic deficits or seizure. an associated cavernous malformation
h Capillary telangiectasias Focal neurologic deficits may be due is present or if the developmental
are rare congenital to hemorrhage, venous thrombosis/ venous anomaly has thrombosed. In
vascular malformations infarction, or, very rarely, compressive these patients, appropriate evaluation
that rarely cause symptoms such as hemifacial spasm. of the seizure disorder and AED
symptoms. When hemorrhage is encountered, other therapy are recommended. If a patient
h Large capillary pathology (ie, an associated cavernous with a developmental venous anomaly
telangiectasias may malformation) should be sought (eg, presents with hemorrhage, the pos-
require the addition of by obtaining hemosiderin-sensitive sibility of an associated cavernous
hemosiderin-sensitive MRI sequences) before attributing signs malformation that bled should be
MRI sequences and and symptoms to a developmental considered. Consultation with a cere-
follow-up MRI to venous anomaly. brovascular neurosurgeon and a vas-
distinguish them from cular neurologist is recommended to
neoplasms. Natural History assess appropriate therapy in these
Few natural history studies assessing rare individual cases.
the risk of hemorrhage from a devel-
opmental venous anomaly exist. The CAPILLARY TELANGIECTASIA
studies suffer from small numbers, lack Capillary telangiectasias typically are
of long-term follow-up, and other meth- found incidentally on brain imaging.
odologic issues. With those caveats, the While occasionally mistaken for a
estimated rate of hemorrhage related to brain tumor because of the gadolini-
a developmental venous anomaly is be- um enhancement, these lesions have a
tween 0.15% and 0.61% per year.14,34 distinct appearance on hemosiderin-
This may be an overestimate because sensitive sequences. Thus, neurologists
of tertiary care referral bias. can be useful in assessing the relation-
ship of presenting symptoms to the
Management and Treatment capillary telangiectasia and aiding in the
Developmental venous anomalies correct diagnosis of the lesion by
drain normal brain. Attempting to assessing whether appropriate MRI se-
surgically remove them may result quences have been performed.
in venous infarction or hemorrhage.
Thus, in most cases, no treatment is Definition and Radiologic
indicated as developmental venous Appearance
anomalies are usually asymptomatic Capillary telangiectasias are angiograph-
and have a relatively benign natural ically occult vascular malformations
history.32 Surveillance imaging in pa- composed of dilated capillaries with
tients who are asymptomatic is gener- normal intervening neural tissue. These
ally not warranted since it would not vascular malformations are typically
alter management. visualized only on a contrast-enhanced
If a patient with a developmental MRI. A combination of a postcontrast
venous anomaly presents with seizure, T1-weighted MRI sequence with a
imaging should be conducted to as- hemosiderin-sensitive image (GRE or
sess whether a more common cause SWI) (Figure 9-7) is ideal for diagno-
of seizure is present before consider- sis.35 A telangiectasia often appears
ing that the developmental venous as a blushlike area of enhancement
206 ContinuumJournal.com February 2017
on the postcontrast sequence with a cor- solitary lesions and located in the pons,
responding hypointense region on the but they may occur elsewhere in the
hemosiderin-sensitive sequence. Most central nervous system. These lesions
telangiectasias are punctate and smaller may be sporadic or part of a syndrome
than 1 cm; however, some are larger or such as Rendu-Osler-Weber syndrome
more diffuse. The latter can sometimes (hereditary hemorrhagic telangiecta-
be mistaken for neoplasm, subacute sia), ataxia-telangiectasia, or Wyburn-
infarction, or demyelinating or inflam- Mason syndrome.
matory disease. The lack of mass effect,
the stability over time, and the finding of Presentation
a hypointensity on SWI in association Capillary telangiectasias are common
with a contrast-enhancing lesion is incidental findings at autopsy and are
highly specific for capillary telangi- rarely symptomatic. 14 Vague non-
ectasia and can reassure the clinician specific neurologic symptoms often
about the benign nature of the lesion. lead to the incidental discovery of
capillary telangiectasia. Rare reports
Epidemiology of all types of neurologic symptoms
Capillary telangiectasias are rare. These have been described, including focal
lesions may be congenital, but they neurologic deficit due to hemor-
have also been described after radiation rhage, seizures, cranial nerve palsies,
to the brain; some feel they may be extrapyramidal disorders, and focal
on a continuum with other vascular hemispheric syndromes. Symptoms
malformations such as cavernous mal- may be episodic, persistent, and
formations. Most commonly, they are rarely progressive.
features. First, it is important to deter- 6. Broderick JP, Brown RD Jr, Sauerbeck L, et al.
Greater rupture risk for familial as
mine the relationship of the symptom compared to sporadic unruptured
to the lesion. A symptomatic lesion is intracranial aneurysms. Stroke 2009;
of higher concern than an asymptom- 40(6):1952Y1957. doi:10.1161/
STROKEAHA.108.542571.
atic one. Next, estimate the natural
history of the lesion based on informa- 7. Greving JP, Wermer MJ, Brown RD Jr, et al.
Development of the PHASES score for
tion provided. This must be weighed prediction of risk of rupture of intracranial
against the surgical or interventional aneurysms: a pooled analysis of six
risk. Together the team (patient, neu- prospective cohort studies. Lancet Neurol
rologist, neurosurgeon, interven- 2014;13(1):59Y66. doi:10.1016/S1474-
4422(13)70263-1.
tionalist) can then make a decision
regarding treatment. Practitioners also 8. Bhogal P, Uff C, Makalanda HL. Vessel
wall MRI and intracranial aneurysms.
must manage comorbid conditions,
J Neurointervent Surg
such as seizures and headaches, and 2016;8(11):1160Y1162. doi:10.1136/
counsel patients about lifestyle re- neurintsurg-2015-012130.
strictions. Finally, it is important to
9. Brown RD Jr, Broderick JP. Unruptured
determine the mode and timing of intracranial aneurysms: epidemiology,
surveillance imaging. natural history, management options,
and familial screening. Lancet Neurol
2014;13(4):393Y404. doi:10.1016/
REFERENCES S1474-4422(14)70015-8.
1. Thompson BG, Brown RD Jr, Amin-Hanjani S,
et al. Guidelines for the management 10. Etminan N, Brown RD Jr, Beseoglu K, et al.
of patients with unruptured The unruptured intracranial aneurysm
intracranial aneurysms: a guideline for treatment score: a multidisciplinary
healthcare professionals from the consensus. Neurology 2015;85(10):881Y889.
American Heart Association/American doi:10.1212/WNL.0000000000001891.
30. Li D, Hao SY, Jia GJ, et al. Hemorrhage risks malformations: pathophysiological, diagnostic,
and functional outcomes of untreated and surgical considerations. Neurosurg Focus
brainstem cavernous malformations. 2006;21(1):e5.
J Neurosurg 2014;121(1):32Y41. doi:10.3171/ 34. Garner TB, Del Curling O Jr, Kelly DL Jr,
2014.3.JNS132537. Laster DW. The natural history of
31. D’Angelo VA, De Bonis C, Amoroso R, et al. intracranial venous angiomas. J Neurosurg
Supratentorial cerebral cavernous 1991;75(5):715Y722.
malformations: clinical, surgical, and genetic
35. El-Koussy M, Schroth G, Gralla J, et al.
involvement. Neurosurg Focus 2006;21(1):e9. Susceptibility-weighted MR imaging for
32. Rammos SK, Maina R, Lanzino G. Developmental diagnosis of capillary telangiectasia of the
venous anomalies: current concepts brain. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2012;33(4):
and implications for management. 715Y720. doi:10.3174/ajnr.A2893.
Neurosurgery 2009;65(1):20Y29; discussion
36. Gross BA, Puri AS, Popp AJ, Du R. Cerebral
29Y30. doi:10.1227/01.NEU.0000347091
capillary telangiectasias: a meta-analysis
.06694.3E.
and review of the literature. Neurosurg Rev
33. Perrini P, Lanzino G. The association of venous 2013;36(2):187Y193; discussion 194.
developmental anomalies and cavernous doi:10.1007/s10143-012-0435-9.
Inherited and
Address correspondence to
Dr Jennifer Juhl Majersik,
University of Utah,
175 N Medical Center
KEY POINT
h Fabry disease is most
easily diagnosed by
a readily available
and standardized
enzymatic test that
measures leukocyte
!-galactosidase A
activity. However,
women may require
molecular genetic
testing or skin biopsy
because of normal to
low enzymatic testing.
than in the general population; how- severe form of migraine, can be severe
ever, migraine with aura is typically enough to require hospitalization in
reported to occur in 20% to 40% of up to 11% of symptomatic patients with
patients,15 with one large 2016 series CADASIL (Case 10-1).17 This consists
reporting migraine with aura in 75% of prolonged (median of 8 days, range
of patients who were symptomatic,17 3 to 17 days) but ultimately reversible
a markedly high prevalence compared reduced consciousness without other
to the general population. Hemiplegic cause. CADASIL encephalopathy typi-
migraine occurs in 16% of patients cally begins with a migraine headache
with CADASIL and migraine,17 and and is often accompanied by nausea/
CADASIL encephalopathy, also called vomiting, seizures, fever, and even hal-
CADASIL coma, a particularly disabling lucinations.17 MR-based arterial spin
Case 10-1
A 46-year-old man presented to the emergency department with the
gradual onset of confusion and partial left hemiparesis following a severe
migraine that began the day before. He had a prior history of migraine
with aura, a family history of early-onset stroke, and a recent MRI with
leukoaraiosis, including anterior temporal lobe T2 hyperintensities but no
lacunes. These characteristics had led to molecular genetic testing 2 years
before the current presentation, which revealed a DNA sequence variation
in the NOTCH3 gene causing an odd number of cysteine residues within an
epidermal growth factor repeat, and the diagnosis of cerebral autosomal
dominant arteriopathy with subcortical infarcts and leukoencephalopathy
(CADASIL). He vomited in the emergency department, and his examination
showed confusion and mild weakness on the left side. He was admitted,
and a brain MRI showed no acute ischemia or hemorrhage. Over the next
few days, his headache fluctuated and he continued to worsen, developing
visual hallucinations, mild fever to 38 -C (100.5 -F), and a fluctuating but
downward-trending neurologic examination, eventually becoming mute
and akinetic. His EEG showed slowing but no seizures. He was treated with
multiple nonergot, nontriptan acute migraine therapies, and after 3 days,
his mentation started to improve. He was discharged home on day 7 with
improved cognition, speech, and gait. He later reported in clinic that he was
back to his normal baseline 10 days after initial onset.
Comment. A severe form of CADASIL migraine, termed CADASIL
encephalopathy or CADASIL coma, consists of prolonged but ultimately
reversible reduced consciousness without other cause and without brain
ischemia. It typically evolves from a migraine headache; is commonly
accompanied by seizures, fever, hallucinations, or nausea/vomiting; and
lasts a median of 8 days (range 3 to 17 days).17 Magnetic resonanceYbased
arterial spin labeling in patients with CADASIL encephalopathy has
revealed reversible global and regional cerebral hyperperfusion.18
Although it has been hypothesized that patients with CADASIL with
migraine may represent a more severe phenotype, one study found that
patients with CADASIL without migraine had a higher cumulative
incidence of stroke and hypothesized that, through preconditioning,
cortical spreading depression in CADASIL may protect the brain against
subsequent ischemia.17
KEY POINT
h Molecular genetic hemorrhage [ICH]), with microbleeds a false-negative genetic result. In this
testing is the gold being present in the majority of pub- instance, if the neurologist remains
standard for the lished ICH cases.25 The MRI findings highly suspicious of CADASIL, he or
diagnosis of CADASIL, that best correlate with clinical impair- she should consider ordering a skin
with 100% specificity ment in CADASIL are the number of biopsy that includes vascular basal lam-
and nearly 100% lacunes and brain volume.20 Athero- ina to evaluate for granular osmophilic
sensitivity when sclerotic changes in the medium and material, a highly specific finding for
screening the 23 exons large cervicocephalic vessels are typ- CADASIL. A genetic test that finds a
for a mutation leading ically minimal or absent. sequence variant of unknown signifi-
to an odd number of The NOTCH3 gene encodes a trans-
cysteine residues within
cance not involving a cysteine residue
membrane receptor that contains 34 should also prompt skin biopsy. Given
an epidermal growth
epidermal growth factor repeats (EGFR), the clinical and radiographic overlap
factor repeat. For
patients in whom a high
a large transmembrane protein neces- between CADASIL and other disor-
suspicion of CADASIL sary for vascular smooth muscle differ- ders, a CADASIL scale has been devel-
exists but who have a entiation and development. Each EGFR oped to predict which patients should
negative genetic test, normally has six cysteine residues. Over undergo genetic testing for CADASIL.27
skin biopsy may reveal 150 causal mutations have been re- Although the initial study showed high
granular osmophilic ported, the vast majority of which are sensitivity (97%) and specificity (74%)
material in the vascular missense mutations and all of which in an Italian population, this predictive
basal lamina, which is lead to an odd number of cysteine res-
highly diagnostic
accuracy was not replicated in a Chinese
idues within a given EGFR. Although population.28 The decision to test
of CADASIL. the NOTCH3 gene has 33 exons,
asymptomatic individuals within a
more than 90% of CADASIL mutations
family with CADASIL is a very individ-
are found in exons 2 to 24, with more
ualized one that should be made with
than 70% of families harboring muta-
care and after patient education, pos-
tions in exons 3 and 4.15 New causa-
sibly with the assistance of a genetic
tive mutations continue to be regularly
counselor.29 Since CADASIL has no
discovered, and de novo mutations are
known treatment or prevention strategy,
not uncommon but of unknown fre-
quency. Much interfamilial phenotypic genetic testing is not recommended
heterogeneity exists despite sharing in asymptomatic children.
the same mutation, suggesting environ- Unfortunately, because of similarities
mental or epigenetic modifying factors. in clinical presentation and neuroimag-
Patients who are homozygous for the ing, CADASIL is often misdiagnosed as
NOTCH3 mutation have been shown multiple sclerosis and treated with im-
to have a slightly more severe clinical munomodulatory medications that con-
and radiologic phenotype with earlier fer risk without benefit (Figure 10-3).
onset as compared to their heterozy- This highlights the importance of
gous family members.26 performing a detailed family history
Molecular genetic testing is the focused on stroke, migraine, depression/
gold standard for the diagnosis of anxiety, and cognitive decline as well
CADASIL, with 100% specificity and as correct interpretation of CSF find-
nearly 100% sensitivity when screen- ings. In a study of CSF examination in
ing the 23 exons for a mutation leading 87 patients with CADASIL who were
to an odd number of cysteine residues genetically diagnosed, 29% had mildly
within an EGFR. Because of the large elevated protein (mean 40.4 mg/dL,
number of mutations, some of which range 12 mg/dL to 75 mg/dL), only
are located outside of the usually one had oligoclonal bands (1.1%), and
screened exons, it is possible to have none had pleocytosis.30
FIGURE 10-3 MRI findings in cerebral autosomal dominant arteriopathy with subcortical
infarcts and leukoencephalopathy (CADASIL) resembling multiple sclerosis. A,
Sagittal fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) MRI showing white matter
hyperintensities perpendicular to the ventricles, similar to those typically seen in multiple
sclerosis. B, Sagittal FLAIR MRI at the midline shows no hyperintensities in the corpus
callosum. C, Axial FLAIR MRI at the level of the lateral ventricles showing subcortical and
periventricular white matter changes. D, Axial FLAIR MRI at the level of the temporal lobes,
showing only minimal leukoaraiosis in the left anterior temporal lobe (arrow).
KEY POINT
h Patients with cerebral disability in patients with CADASIL.31 overall cognitive function as measured
autosomal recessive Antiplatelet therapy is often provided by the Vascular Dementia Assessment
arteriopathy with by vascular neurologists, although with Scale cognitive subscale (VADAS-cog)
subcortical infarcts and the recognition that its benefit has not score but did improve executive func-
leukoencephalopathy been rigorously studied and such use tion, so it is sometimes prescribed.36
(CARASIL) experience could increase the risk of microbleeds
early-onset lacunar or even ICH.32 One common but un- Cerebral Autosomal
stroke (onset in the third tested stroke prevention strategy is to Recessive Arteriopathy With
decade) in the absence prescribe aspirin only in patients with- Subcortical Infarcts and
of hypertension, out microbleeds on MRI. Short-term Leukoencephalopathy
progressive dementia
treatment with atorvastatin does not Cerebral autosomal recessive arteriop-
(onset in the third
improve hemodynamic parameters in athy with subcortical infarcts and leuko-
through fifth decades),
premature alopecia
patients with CADASIL but has not been encephalopathy (CARASIL) causes
(onset in the teen years), tested against the outcome of stroke symptoms similar to CADASIL but ear-
and spondylosis prevention or with long-term use.33 It is lier in life, without migraine, and with
deformans (disk also not known whether IV recombinant the addition of alopecia and low back
degeneration) (onset tissue plasminogen activator (rtPA) is pain. Patients with CARASIL experience
in the second and efficacious in patients with CADASIL, early-onset lacunar stroke (onset in the
third decades). and some controversy exists among third decade) in the absence of hyper-
experts regarding the safety of IV rtPA tension, progressive dementia (onset in
in this population, with fear of in- the third through fifth decades), pre-
creased risk of hemorrhagic transfor- mature alopecia (onset in the teen years),
mation, particularly in those with and spondylosis deformans (disk de-
microbleeds. However, at least one generation) (onset in the second and
case report exists of successful IV rtPA third decades). Early MRI findings are
treatment,25 and it is not unusual for similar to CADASIL: microbleeds as well
patients to be considered for IV rtPA as progressive leukoaraiosis with early
if presenting within the usual rtPA involvement of the external capsule,
window for an acute ischemic stroke. pons, and the frontal white matter.37
For migraine prevention, standard In late stages, a characteristic MRI fea-
medications are typically tried, with no ture of CARASIL is involvement of the
one medication preferred over another.17 pontocerebellar tract, called the arc
However, observational reports of par- sign since it appears as an arc-shaped
ticular benefit from acetazolamide exist, hyperintense lesion from the pons to
possibly because of the hypoperfusion the middle cerebellar peduncles.37
seen in CADASIL.34,35 For migraine treat- CARASIL is caused by mutations in
ment, serotonin (5-hydroxytryptamine 1 the HtrA serine peptidase 1 (HTRA1)
[5-HT1]) receptor agonists (triptans) gene on chromosome 10q.38 HTRA1
are not routinely used because of a pre- binds and cleaves the prodomain of
sumed potential to increase stroke risk, proYtransforming growth factor "1
particularly in patients with complicated (pro-TGF-"1), and the cleaved product
migraine. However, one observational is degraded by the endoplasmic retic-
study of migraine treatments in patients ulum. This mechanism regulates the
with CADASIL reported that 11% of pa- amount of mature TGF-"1.39 Originally
tients had tried triptans, with about a 50% found in Japanese patients, CARASIL is
response rate and no adverse events.17 now known to be present in multiple
In a randomized controlled trial of populations.40 Although CARASIL is
patients with CADASIL with cognitive considered an autosomal recessive con-
impairment, donepezil did not improve dition and quite rare, heterozygotes of
220 ContinuumJournal.com February 2017
KEY POINT
h Moyamoya disease avoidance of even mild head trauma, between the external carotid artery
is a nonatherosclerotic, particularly women of childbearing age and ICA, with eventual disappearance
noninflammatory, since cesarean delivery is strongly rec- of both the moyamoya vessels and
progressive vasculopathy ommended for an affected fetus to the intracranial portion of the ICA.47
that causes narrowing avoid ICH from birth trauma. Moyamoya disease was initially thought
of the distal internal to be always bilateral but is now known
carotid artery and MOYAMOYA DISEASE to sometimes be unilateral. There can
development of small Moyamoya disease is a progressive also be development of posterior
collateral vessels at the occlusive vasculopathy consisting of circulation disease. Histopatholog-
base of the brain that stenosis or occlusion of the terminal ically, arteries in moyamoya disease
look like a puff of smoke
internal carotid artery (ICA), proximal reveal intimal hyperplasia, internal
on an angiogram. It is
anterior cerebral artery, or proximal elastic lamina interruption, and pro-
typically bilateral but can
be unilateral and include
middle cerebral artery, with the subse- liferation of smooth muscle cells.
the posterior circulation. quent development of abnormal vascu- Importantly, atherosclerosis and in-
lar networks at the site of stenosis/ flammation are absent.48 The term
occlusion that feed the basal ganglia moyamoya syndrome is used to de-
(Figure 10-4). In late stages, the so-called note moyamoya vascular changes oc-
internal carotid artery-external carotid curring secondary to atherosclerosis,
artery conversion develops, a compen- thyroid disease, radiation, sickle cell
satory development of anastomosis anemia, or other causes.
KEY POINTS
h Diseases of CEREBRAL AMYLOID crobleeds, cortical superficial siderosis,
small vessels in the ANGIOPATHY and even brain atrophy.56
brain clinically cause Approximately one-third of symptom- Sporadic small vessel disease is
both lacunar strokes atic strokes are due to diseases of the typically classified into two main types:
and intraparenchymal small vessels, defined as parenchymal cerebral amyloid angiopathy and hy-
hemorrhage and, on or leptomeningeal vessels 5 2m to pertensive arteriopathy. Because the
imaging, white matter 2 mm in diameter (1 mm is the typical latter is not always associated with
hyperintensities, limit of visualization on cerebral an- hypertension, some prefer the more
microbleeds, and giogram).55 These vessels either pen- descriptive but somewhat bulky term
atrophy. Very little sporadic nonamyloid microangiopathy.
etrate the cortex via short and long
evidenced-based
penetrating arterioles that supply the Both types can cause microhemor-
treatment exists for
cortex and subcortical white matter or rhages and macrohemorrhages, but
small vessel disease,
with treatment arise from deep perforators that sup- etiologic clues can be taken from lo-
complicated by the ply the base of the brain (basal ganglia, cation; sporadic nonamyloid micro-
need to prevent thalami, and brainstem). Small vessels angiopathy hemorrhages are located
both hemorrhage are end arterioles with their main col- deep (basal ganglia, internal capsule,
and infarct. lateral flow found in the capillary bed, thalamus, brainstem), while cerebral
h Cerebral amyloid not in adjacent arterioles. Thus, when amyloid angiopathyYrelated ICH is
angiopathy is these arteries fail, no vascular backup lobar (cortical-subcortical) and found
characterized system is in place. Additionally, these primarily in posterior cortical regions,
histologically by arteriolar systems do not interconnect followed by frontotemporal and parietal
amyloid-" fibril but meet in the junctional zone around lobes, and, more rarely, the cerebellum.
deposition in the the lateral ventricles, not coincidentally Cerebral amyloid angiopathyYrelated
media of primarily where leukoaraiosis is most prevalent. ICH makes up only 5% to 10% of deep
small to medium Charidimou55 provides an excellent ICH but 50% of lobar ICH.57
blood vessels. summary of the anatomy and patho- Cerebral amyloid angiopathy is char-
physiology of small vessel disease. acterized histologically by amyloid-"
Although evidence-based treatments fibril deposition in the media of primar-
exist for large artery atherosclerotic neu- ily small to medium blood vessels. De-
rovascular diseases, how best to pre- generative changes follow the amyloid
vent or treat diseases of small vessels is deposition, with fibrous thickening,
not yet known. Unlike most large artery necrosis, and wall thinning with possi-
disorders, diseases of the small vessels ble formation of microaneurysms. Un-
can cause both ischemia and hemor- like other forms of ICH, traditional
rhage, which complicates treatment. vascular risk factors other than increased
Clinically, small vessel disease is the age do not increase the risk of cerebral
primary cause of two main stroke types: amyloid angiopathyYrelated ICH. The
lacunar infarcts and intraparenchymal vast majority of cerebral amyloid angio-
hemorrhages. Small vessel diseases also pathy is sporadic, with only exceed-
cause nearly half of dementias and sub- ingly rare cases being monogenic.
stantially contribute to functional im- Future predictive models of cerebral
pairments in the elderly, including amyloid angiopathyYrelated ICH risk
cortical gait disorders, cognitive impair- may include results of genetic analy-
ment, and urinary symptoms.55 Imag- sis of specific risk-conferring variants,
ing sequelae of small vessel disease such as those in the CR1,58 ACE,59 and
include not only the well-studied white APOE genes,60 which predict risk of
matter hyperintensities of presumed cerebral amyloid angiopathyYrelated
vascular origin, but also enlargement ICH and recurrent cerebral amyloid
of perivascular spaces, cerebral mi- angiopathyYrelated ICH.
224 ContinuumJournal.com February 2017
KEY POINT
h To prevent patients with cerebral amyloid angio- the cardiovascular benefits for both pri-
recurrent intracerebral pathy in particular is as of yet unknown. mary and secondary cardiovascular pre-
hemorrhage, most It is even less clear whether antiplatelet vention.69 It is not known if statins are
experts withhold agents are safe in patients with an in- contraindicated in patients with arterio-
anticoagulation and dication for such therapy (eg, myocar- losclerotic lobar ICH, which has differ-
statins in patients with dial infarction, ischemic stroke from ent pathophysiologic mechanisms. To
cerebral amyloid large artery atherosclerosis) but who also date, studies are mixed as to whether or
angiopathyYrelated have cerebral amyloid angiopathyY not cerebral microhemorrhages on pre-
intracerebral hemorrhage. related microhemorrhages without his- treatment MRI increase the risk of symp-
tory of lobar hemorrhage. tomatic ICH after rtPA in acute ischemic
Hypercholesterolemia is also associ- stroke, and experts do not currently rec-
ated with increased ICH risk, possibly ommend withholding rtPA in such
mediated by low triglyceride levels.57 patients if they are otherwise eligible,
The effects of statins on ICH risk re- but rather to include the presence of
main controversial, with some second- microhemorrhages as an additional
ary prevention trials showing increased piece of evidence in weighing potential
ICH risk in those on statins with prior risk versus benefit of thrombolysis.70
history of ICH67 but meta-analyses
refuting increased ICH rates in unse- PREGNANCY-ASSOCIATED
lected populations on statins.68 A deci- STROKE
sion analysis analyzed ICH rates in Pregnancy and the peripartum period
cerebral amyloid angiopathyYrelated are associated with an increased risk of
lobar ICH and found that statin avoidance both ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke.
was the preferred treatment strategy, A US-based study using nationwide
since statin therapy was predicted to sampling determined the overall prev-
increase the baseline annual probability alence of pregnancy-related stroke
of ICH recurrence from approximately hospitalizations as 71 per 100,000 deliv-
14% to approximately 22%, offsetting ery hospitalizations,71 nearly triple the
Case 10-2
A 75-year-old man without prior neurologic history began having episodes of right upper extremity
numbness, decreased coordination, and weakness that lasted 5 minutes and self-resolved. He was
diagnosed with transient ischemic attacks (TIAs) in an emergency department and started on aspirin.
However, the episodes increased in frequency and duration (lasting 15 to 30 minutes) and began to be
accompanied by right facial droop and dysarthria, but always with complete resolution of symptoms.
He again sought medical care and received multiple head CTs, brain MRIs, neck and head vessel
imaging, and an echocardiogram, all reported as normal. He was advanced to aspirin/extended-release
dipyridamole and begun on a statin. However, the episodes continued, and he presented to another
emergency department where review of prior imaging revealed subtle left central sulcus hemorrhage;
repeat brain MRI confirmed bilateral central sulcal subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) and showed
scattered areas of chronic microhemorrhage without acute ischemia or prior infarct (Figure 10-5A).
He was diagnosed with amyloid spells due to cortical superficial siderosis from cerebral amyloid
angiopathy. Antiplatelet agents were stopped, and an antiepileptic drug was started, with resolution
of his spells. He subsequently did well without further spells but with a slowly progressive cognitive
decline. He presented to the emergency department again at age 82 for several days of increasing
confusion, including walking into walls. A head CT revealed occipital lobar ICH as well as increased
microhemorrhages and superficial siderosis (Figures 10-5B and 10-5C). He received conservative
management, including tight blood pressure control, and was discharged to a skilled nursing facility.
Continued on page 227
FIGURE 10-5 Imaging of the patient in Case 10-2. A, Axial gradient recalled echo (GRE) MRI (left and middle) and
susceptibility-weighted imaging (SWI) (right) images at age 75 reveal bilateral central sulcus subarachnoid
hemorrhage, more prominent on the left (long arrows). Additionally, multiple punctate areas of greater
susceptibility artifact are seen diffusely, most of which are centered at the gray-white interface (short arrows). There was
associated reactive pial enhancement and neither acute ischemia nor prior infarct (not shown). B, Same patient at age 82 after
several days of confusion. Axial noncontrast head CT shows right occipital hemorrhage. C, Same patient. Comparison of axial
SWI MRI sequences at age 75 (left of each of the pairs) to those at the same level at age 82 (right of each of the pairs). In addition
to the new occipital ICH, at every level new microhemorrhages and increased superficial siderosis in the convexities are seen.
Comment. Up to 20% of patients with cerebral amyloid angiopathy have transient spells, often termed
amyloid spells, particularly in patients with cortical superficial siderosis. Amyloid spells last up to 30 minutes
and consist of either positive or negative symptoms, with a classic presentation being stereotypic slowly
progressive paresthesia. Amyloid spells can be easily misdiagnosed as TIA or migraine equivalent unless
hemorrhage-sensitive magnetic resonanceYbased imaging is done. Such misdiagnosis can result in
inappropriate antithrombotic treatments and worsening of cerebral amyloid angiopathy hemorrhage.
KEY POINT
h New-onset seizures prevalence of stroke in nonpregnant, cardioembolic stroke from peripartum
in a woman in the nonYhormone-using young women cardiomyopathy.
latter half of pregnancy (24 per 100,000 person-years).72 Al- Eclampsia is thought to be due to
should not be assumed though overall age-adjusted stroke abnormal placental implantation that
to be eclampsia incidence is declining in the United causes placental hypoxia and subse-
but should prompt a States, the prevalence among preg- quent release of vascular mediators
complete evaluation for nant women has increased by 54% such as vascular endothelial growth
noneclamptic causes. compared to the decade prior, which factor, leading to endothelial cell injury
is at least partially explained by the and widespread vasospasm, which is
simultaneous increase in hyperten- considered central to the condition.
sive disorders.71 Vasoconstriction leads to increased resis-
The highest-risk time period for tance to blood flow with resultant
pregnancy-related stroke is during the hypertension and generalized endothe-
third trimester, delivery, and postpar- lial disruption. The endotheliopathy
tum period, with over half of strokes may also be partially responsible for
occurring postpartum and approxi- the lack of autoregulation in the pres-
mately two-thirds of antenatal strokes ence of hypertension, which could lead,
occurring in the third trimester.73,74 A in particular, to ischemic and hemor-
2014 study examined the postpartum rhagic stroke.76
thrombotic risk for 1 year postpartum Sudden focal neurologic deficits in a
and found that thrombotic risk, includ- pregnant woman should prompt rapid
ing stroke, is elevated 6 weeks post- evaluation. Although new-onset seizures
partum (odds ratio 10.8, 95% confidence are necessary for the diagnosis of
interval, 7.8Y15.1) with continued in- eclampsia, new seizures in a woman in
creased risk up to 12 weeks postpartum the latter half of pregnancy should not
(odds ratio 7 to 12 weeks postpartum of exclude evaluation for alternative expla-
2.2; 95% confidence interval, 1.5Y3.1) nations, with one study finding that
with return to baseline thrombotic risk presumption of eclampsia in pregnant
at 16 weeks postpartum.75 patients with seizure delayed correct
Hemorrhagic stroke is more com- diagnosis in 42%, of which ultimately
mon during pregnancy than in the non- only 20% met diagnostic criteria of
pregnant state: hemorrhagic stroke eclampsia.77 Thus rapid neuroimaging
accounts for 16% of antenatal strokes, is critical for proper evaluation of a preg-
11% of strokes during delivery, and 36% nant woman with new-onset neurologic
of postpartum stroke hospitalizations.71 symptoms, including vessel imaging,
Cerebral venous thrombosis is also more given the wide differential of stroke
common in pregnancy-associated stroke, causes in pregnancy.
accounting for 31%, 43%, and 24% of Although head CTs use ionizing
antenatal, delivery, and postpartum radiation, fetal exposure is very low.
stroke hospitalizations, respectively.71 CT-based angiograms and perfusion
Although pregnant women may have studies result in higher exposures. Pelvic
conventional causes of stroke, they are and abdominal shielding are typically
particularly at risk for stroke from un- required during CT, such as in the sit-
usual causes, including eclampsia (the uation of rapid evaluation for IV tissue
major contributor to stroke in preg- plasminogen activator, although fetal
nancy), posterior reversible encepha- exposure is actually due to internal
lopathy syndrome (PRES), reversible scatter within the mother that is not
cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome, reduced by external shielding. MRI is
cerebral venous sinus thrombosis, and far superior to CT to visualize the
228 ContinuumJournal.com February 2017
Case 10-3
A 25-year-old woman in her third trimester of pregnancy presented to
the emergency department after a day of increasing headache and blurry
vision. Upon arrival, her blood pressure was 150/100 mm Hg and she was
confused. Her visual acuity was 20/20 and her pupils were reactive, but
she had difficulty reaching for objects (optic apraxia). She then had a
generalized tonic-clonic seizure. An immediately obtained head CT showed
no intracerebral hemorrhage, and CT angiography of the head and neck
revealed no arterial or venous abnormalities. However, a subsequent
noncontrast brain MRI revealed posterior occipital edema without infarct.
She was diagnosed with posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome
(PRES) and given IV magnesium for seizure control, IV fluid hydration, and
IV labetalol for tight blood pressure control. She was admitted to the
neurocritical care unit for further management.
Comment. Seizures and any other sudden focal neurologic changes in a
pregnant woman require rapid evaluation, including imaging of the brain
parenchyma and head and neck vessels, to allow diagnosis of reversible
cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome, PRES, cerebral venous thrombosis, and
the usual considerations in nonpregnant patients, such as brain tumor.
Head CTs in a pregnant woman subject the fetus to low radiation levels
and are acceptable when necessary for the life of the mother. Brain MRIs
do not subject the fetus to any radiation or other risk and are the
preferred imaging modality if time allows due to their safety profile and
better diagnostic discrimination. However, gadolinium, the standard
contrast agent with MRI, is contraindicated in pregnancy since it crosses
the placenta and deposits in fetal tissue.
KEY POINT
h Despite a lack of with a 24.7 times elevated risk of fits outweigh the anticipated increased
randomized trial data, hemorrhagic stroke and a 91.1 times risks of uterine bleeding, noting that
expert opinion suggests elevated risk of ischemic stroke in urgent consultation with obstetrics is
that IV recombinant women with preeclampsia/eclampsia highly recommended.84
tissue plasminogen compared to those without.79 Endovascular treatment has been de-
activator should not be Treatment of stroke in pregnancy finitively shown to be efficacious in pa-
withheld from a focuses on preserving the health of the tients with acute ischemic stroke from
pregnant woman who mother. Although pregnancy is listed as ICA or proximal middle cerebral artery
is otherwise eligible for a relative contraindication for IV rtPA,80 occlusions and in whom treatment can
the therapy. rtPA is too large to cross the placenta be initiated within 6 hours of symptom
and no maternal or fetal toxicity is ap- onset.85 Although the recommenda-
parent when dosed at 0.9 mg/kg, the tions are silent on eligibility of pregnant
standard dose in ischemic stroke.81 IV women, a handful of case reports have
rtPA risk in pregnancy is predominantly shown benefit to the pregnant woman
due to uterine hemorrhage, but IV rtPA with stroke.86 Fetal risk is increased
has been used successfully in many case mainly because of the procedural re-
reports, and expert opinion is clear that quirement of ionizing radiation. Endo-
it should not be withheld from a preg- vascular treatment is generally viewed
nant woman who is otherwise eligible as appropriate for the pregnant woman
for the therapy (Case 10-4).81Y83 The when chosen carefully according to
2016 updated American Heart Associ- guidelines laid out for patients who are
ation (AHA)/American Stroke Associa- not pregnant and may even be prefer-
tion (ASA) recommendations for rtPA in able if immediately available, as it can
ischemic stroke, which provide scien- avoid the risk of extracranial hemor-
tific rationale for each inclusion and ex- rhage from systemic thrombolysis.
clusion criterion including pregnancy, However, systemic rtPA should be
affirm that IV rtPA may be considered given if endovascular treatment will be
for use in disabling ischemic stroke in delayed more than 30 to 60 minutes
pregnancy when the anticipated bene- (eg, if waiting for the arrival of the
Case 10-4
A 30-year-old previously healthy woman who was 28 weeks
pregnant and recently diagnosed with preeclampsia presented to the
emergency department after the sudden onset of left-sided weakness
and vision loss. Her initial National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale
score was 10 for left homonymous hemianopia and left-sided hemiparesis
and partial sensory loss. Immediate noncontrast head CT revealed a
hyperdense right middle cerebral artery. As she was within 3 hours of
onset, she was given IV recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rtPA) at
standard dosing of 0.9 mg/kg. During the infusion, she was transported to
a comprehensive stroke center for consideration of endovascular therapy.
Comment. Although it was initially unclear as to whether rtPA is
safe in pregnancy, expert opinion and the American Heart
Association/American Stroke Association now agree that rtPA should not
be withheld in disabling ischemic stroke in pregnancy if no other
contraindications exist. Endovascular therapy is also considered appropriate
in pregnant patients, using the same criteria as is standard for the
nonpregnant patient.
26. Abou Al-Shaar H, Qadi N, Al-Hamed MH, 37. Nozaki H, Sekine Y, Fukutake T, et al.
et al. Phenotypic comparison of individuals Characteristic features and progression of
with homozygous or heterozygous mutation abnormalities on MRI for CARASIL. Neurology
of NOTCH3 in a large CADASIL family. J 2015;85(5):459Y463. doi:10.1212/
Neurol Sci 2016;367:239-243. doi:10.1016/ WNL.0000000000001803.
j.jns.2016.05.061.
38. Hara K, Shiga A, Fukutake T, et al. Association
27. Pescini F, Nannucci S, Bertaccini B, et al. of HTRA1 mutations and familial ischemic
The Cerebral Autosomal-Dominant cerebral small-vessel disease. N Engl J Med
Arteriopathy With Subcortical Infarcts and 2009;360(17):1729-1739. doi:10.1056/
Leukoencephalopathy (CADASIL) Scale: NEJMoa0801560.
a screening tool to select patients for
39. Shiga A, Nozaki H, Yokoseki A, et al. Cerebral
NOTCH3 gene analysis. Stroke
small-vessel disease protein HTRA1 controls
2012;43(11):2871-2876. doi:10.1161/
the amount of TGF-"1 via cleavage of
STROKEAHA.112.665927.
proTGF-"1. Hum Mol Genet 2011;20(9):
28. Liu X, Zuo Y, Sun W, et al. The genetic 1800-1810. doi:10.1093/hmg/ddr063.
spectrum and the evaluation of CADASIL
40. Roeben B, Uhrig S, Bender B, Synofzik M.
screening scale in Chinese patients with
Teaching NeuroImages: when alopecia and
NOTCH3 mutations. J Neurol Sci 2015;
354(1-2):63-69. doi:10.1016/j.jns.2015.04.047. disk herniations meet vascular
leukoencephalopathy: CARASIL. Neurology
29. Reyes S, Kurtz A, Hervé D, et al. 2016;86(15):e166-e167. doi:10.1212/
Presymptomatic genetic testing in CADASIL. WNL.0000000000002572.
J Neurol 2012;259(10):2131Y2136.
doi:10.1007/s00415-012-6468-8. 41. Nozaki H, Kato T, Nihonmatsu M, et al.
Distinct molecular mechanisms of HTRA1
30. Dichgans M, Wick M, Gasser T. Cerebrospinal mutants in manifesting heterozygotes with
fluid findings in CADASIL. Neurology CARASIL. Neurology 2016;86(21):1964-1974.
1999;53(1):233. doi:10.1212/WNL.53.1.233. doi:10.1212/WNL.0000000000002694.
31. Ciolli L, Pescini F, Salvadori E, et al. 42. Dhamija R, Schiff D, Lopes MB, et al.
Influence of vascular risk factors and Evolution of brain lesions in a patient with
neuropsychological profile on functional TREX1 cerebroretinal vasculopathy.
performances in CADASIL: results from the Neurology 2015;85(18):1633-1634.
MIcrovascular LEukoencephalopathy Study doi:10.1212/WNL.0000000000002092.
(MILES). Eur J Neurol 2014;21(1):65-71.
doi:10.1111/ene.12241. 43. Richards A, van den Maagdenberg AM,
Jen JC, et al. C-terminal truncations in
32. Oh JH, Lee JS, Kang SY, et al. Aspirin-associated human 3’-5’ DNA exonuclease TREX1 cause
intracerebral hemorrhage in a patient with autosomal dominant retinal vasculopathy
CADASIL. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 2008; with cerebral leukodystrophy. Nat Genet
110(4):384-386. doi:10.1016/j.clineuro. 2007;39(9):1068-1070. doi:10.1002/acr.21689.
2007.12.001.
44. Kernt M, Gschwendtner A, Neubauer AS,
33. Peters N, Freilinger T, Opherk C, et al. et al. Effects of intravitreal bevacizumab
Effects of short term atorvastatin treatment treatment on proliferative retinopathy in
on cerebral hemodynamics in CADASIL. a patient with cerebroretinal vasculopathy.
J Neurol Sci 2007;260(1-2):100-105. J Neurol 2010;257(7):1213-1214.
doi:10.1016/j.jns.2007.04.015. doi:10.1007/s00415-010-5500-0.
34. Donnini I, Nannucci S, Valenti R, et al. 45. Lanfranconi S, Markus HS. COL4A1
Acetazolamide for the prophylaxis of mutations as a monogenic cause of cerebral
migraine in CADASIL: a preliminary experience. small vessel disease: a systematic review. Stroke
J Headache Pain 2012;13(4):299-302. 2010;41(8):e513-e518. doi:10.1161/
doi:10.1007/s10194-012-0426-9. STROKEAHA.110.581918.
35. Forteza AM, Brozman B, Rabinstein AA, et al. 46. Vahedi K, Kubis N, Boukobza M, et al.
Acetazolamide for the treatment of migraine COL4A1 mutation in a patient with sporadic,
with aura in CADASIL. Neurology 2001;57(11): recurrent intracerebral hemorrhage. Stroke
2144-2145. doi:10.1212/WNL.57.11.2144. 2007;38(5):1461Y1464. doi:10.1161/
STROKEAHA.106.475194.
36. Dichgans M, Markus HS, Salloway S, et al.
Donepezil in patients with subcortical 47. Fujimura M, Tominaga T. Diagnosis of
vascular cognitive impairment: a randomised moyamoya disease: international standard
double-blind trial in CADASIL. Lancet and regional differences. Neurol Med Chir
Neurol 2008;7(4):310-318. doi:10.1016/ (Tokyo) 2015;55(3):189Y193. doi:10.2176/
S1474-4422(08)70046-2. nmc.ra.2014-0307.
70. Barrett KM, Spengos K. Cerebral microbleeds a guideline for healthcare professionals
and tissue plasminogen activator: does from the American Heart Association/American
blood beget blood? Neurology 2015;85(11): Stroke Association. Stroke 2013;44(3):870-947.
925-926. doi:10.1212/WNL.0000000000001934. doi:10.1161/STR.0b013e318284056a.
71. Kuklina EV, Tong X, Bansil P, et al. Trends 81. Selim MH, Molina CA. The use of
in pregnancy hospitalizations that included tissue plasminogen-activator in pregnancy:
a stroke in the United States from 1994 a taboo treatment or a time to think
to 2007: reasons for concern? Stroke out of the box. Stroke 2013;44(3):868-869.
2011;42(9):2564-2570. doi:10.1161/ doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.111.000677.
STROKEAHA.110.610592.
82. Demchuk AM. Yes, intravenous thrombolysis
72. Lidegaard K, Løkkegaard E, Jensen A, should be administered in pregnancy when
et al. Thrombotic stroke and myocardial other clinical and imaging factors are
infarction with hormonal contraception. favorable. Stroke 2013;44(3):864-865.
N Engl J Med 2012;366(24):2257-2266. doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.111.000134.
doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1111840.
83. Broderick JP. Should intravenous thrombolysis
73. Kittner SJ, Stern BJ, Feeser BR, et al. be considered the first option in pregnant
Pregnancy and the risk of stroke. N Engl women? Stroke 2013;44(3):866Y867.
J Med 1996;335(11):768Y774. doi:10.1056/ doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.112.658070.
NEJM199609123351102.
84. Demaerschalk BM, Kleindorfer DO,
74. Scott CA, Bewley S, Rudd A, et al. Adeoye OM, et al. Scientific rationale for
Incidence, risk factors, management, the inclusion and exclusion criteria for
and outcomes of stroke in pregnancy. intravenous alteplase in acute ischemic
Obstet Gynecol 2012;120(2 pt 1):318-324. stroke: a statement for healthcare
doi:10.1097/AOG.0b013e31825f287c. professionals from the American Heart
Association/American Stroke Association.
75. Kamel H, Navi BB, Sriram N, et al. Risk Stroke 2016;47(2):581-641. doi:10.1161/
of a thrombotic event after the 6-week STR.0000000000000086.
postpartum period. N Engl J Med 2014;
370(14):1307-1315. doi:10.1056/ 85. Powers WJ, Derdeyn CP, Biller J, et al. 2015
NEJMoa1311485. American Heart Association/American Stroke
Association Focused Update of the 2013
76. Bushnell CD, Hurn P, Colton C, et al. Guidelines for the Early Management of
Advancing the study of stroke in women: Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke Regarding
summary and recommendations for Endovascular Treatment: a guideline for
future research from an NINDS-Sponsored healthcare professionals from the American
Multidisciplinary Working Group. Heart Association/American Stroke Association.
Stroke 2006;37(9):2387-2399. doi:10.1161/ Stroke 2015;46(10):3020-3035. doi:10.1161/
01.STR.0000236053.37695.15. STR.0000000000000074.
77. Witlin AG, Friedman SA, Egerman RS, 86. Ishii A, Miyamoto S. Endovascular treatment
et al. Cerebrovascular disorders in pregnancy. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo)
complicating pregnancyVbeyond 2013;53(8):541-548. doi:10.2176/nmc.53.541.
eclampsia. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1997;176(6):
1139-1145; discussion 1145Y1138. 87. Abou-Chebl A, Lin R, Hussain MS, et al.
doi:10.1016/S0002-9378(97)70327-2. Conscious sedation versus general
anesthesia during endovascular therapy for
78. American College of Obstetricians and acute anterior circulation stroke: preliminary
Gynecologists; Task Force on Hypertension results from a retrospective, multicenter
in Pregnancy. Hypertension in pregnancy. study. Stroke 2010;41(6):1175-1179.
Report of the American College of doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.109.574129.
Obstetricians and Gynecologists’ Task Force
on Hypertension in Pregnancy. Obstet 88. Smith GN, Pudwell J, Walker M, Wen SW.
Gynecol 2013;122(5):1122-1131. doi:10.1097/ Ten-year, thirty-year, and lifetime
01.AOG.0000437382.03963.88. cardiovascular disease risk estimates
following a pregnancy complicated by
79. Tang CH, Wu CS, Lee TH, et al. preeclampsia. J Obstet Gynaecol Can
Preeclampsia-eclampsia and the risk of 2012;34(9):830-835. doi:10.1016/
stroke among peripartum in Taiwan. S1701-2163(16)35381-6.
Stroke 2009;40(4):1162-1168.
doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.108.540880. 89. McDonald SD, Malinowski A, Zhou Q, et al.
Cardiovascular sequelae of preeclampsia/
80. Jauch EC, Saver JL, Adams HP Jr, et al. eclampsia: a systematic review and
Guidelines for the early management meta-analyses. Am Heart J 2008;156(5):
of patients with acute ischemic stroke: 918-930. doi:10.1016/j.ahj.2008.06.042.
Stroke Rehabilitation
Address correspondence to
Dr Samir R. Belagaje, Emory
University, 80 Jesse Hill Jr Dr
SE, Faculty Office Bldg, Room
375, Atlanta, GA 30303, Samir R. Belagaje, MD
[email protected].
Relationship Disclosure:
Dr Belagaje reports
no disclosure. ABSTRACT
Unlabeled Use of Purpose of Review: Rehabilitation is an important aspect of the continuum of care
Products/Investigational
Use Disclosure:
in stroke. With advances in the acute treatment of stroke, more patients will survive
Dr Belagaje discusses the stroke with varying degrees of disability. Research in the past decade has expanded
unlabeled/investigational use our understanding of the mechanisms underlying stroke recovery and has led to the
of fluoxetine for poststroke
motor recovery treatment,
development of new treatment modalities. This article reviews and summarizes the
cholinesterase inhibitors and key concepts related to poststroke recovery.
memantine for the treatment Recent Findings: Good data now exist by which one can predict recovery, especially
of aphasia, and dopaminergic
agents to aid in the treatment
motor recovery, very soon after stroke onset. Recent trials have not demonstrated a
of poststroke depression. clear benefit associated with very early initiation of rehabilitative therapy after stroke in
* 2017 American Academy terms of improvement in poststroke outcomes. However, growing evidence suggests
of Neurology. that shorter and more frequent sessions of therapy can be safely started in the first
24 to 48 hours after a stroke. The optimal amount or dose of therapy for stroke
remains undetermined, as more intensive treatments have not been associated with
better outcomes compared to standard intensities of therapy. Poststroke depression
adversely affects recovery across a variety of measures and is an important target for
therapy. Additionally, the use of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs)
appears to benefit motor recovery through pleiotropic mechanisms beyond their
antidepressant effect. Other pharmacologic approaches also appear to have a benefit
in stroke rehabilitation.
Summary: A comprehensive rehabilitation program is essential to optimize poststroke
outcomes. Rehabilitation is a process that uses three major principles of recovery:
adaptation, restitution, and neuroplasticity. Based on these principles, multiple
different approaches, both pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic, exist to enhance
rehabilitation. In addition to neurologists, a variety of health care professionals are
involved in stroke rehabilitation. Successful rehabilitation involves understanding the
natural history of stroke recovery and a multidisciplinary approach with judicious use of
resources to identify and treat common poststroke sequelae.
KEY POINTS
h The human brain develop a rehabilitation plan to reach questions, and regeneration holds
recovers from a stroke the defined recovery goals. hope for the future.
through adaptation, A human brain recovers from stroke Neuroplasticity, generally defined
regeneration, and in three main ways: adaptation, regen- as changes or a rewiring in the neural
neuroplasticity. eration, and neuroplasticity. Most network, is considered to be the main
h Neuroplasticity is driven successful rehabilitation techniques recovery process. Soon after a stroke,
by principles of task incorporate at least one of these activation is decreased in cortical areas
specificity, repetition, processes. Adaptation is the reliance directly affected by the stroke. This
and challenge. on alternative physical movements or reduced activity is associated with a
devices to compensate for poststroke change in the localization of certain
deficits. An example would be the use tasks such as movement. As time
of the nondominant hand to feed progresses through the acute and
oneself after hemiplegia affecting subacute period, the neural networks
dominant hand function. Assistive de- that had been disrupted by the
vices include a walker for poststroke stroke reconnect in areas adjacent to
gait and balance dysfunction and the area of stroke and coincide with
prisms in glasses to compensate for clinical recovery. For example, func-
visual field deficits. While adaptation tional neuroimaging techniques show
is helpful, it may also be harmful to the that as hand function improves, cor-
recovery process because of learned tical representation that once sub-
disuse. This phenomenon occurs served the hand moves toward the
when individuals do not use their cortical face area (Figure 11-15).6 This,
affected limb because they have de- in turn, causes an activation in the peri-
veloped habits to complete actions ischemic area/ischemic area with return
and tasks bypassing use of the limb, of laterality to functions and alteration
even though they have the capacity to of representative cortical maps. Fur-
use it. Limiting use of the limb can also thermore, the amount of recovery
limit its recovery. correlates with the degree of activation
Regeneration is the growth of neu- in the peri-infarct areas. In general, less
rons and associated cells and circuity functional poststroke recovery is seen
to replace those damaged from a in neural networks that have activation
stroke. This approach has historically in areas more widely distributed be-
been considered least useful in stroke yond the peri-infarct territory.
rehabilitation as it was believed that Research studies have demonstrated
central nervous system tissue did not that neuroplasticity is driven by sev-
have the capacity for regrowth after eral key principles. For plasticity to
injury. However, regeneration has fully occur, rehabilitation interven-
been the focus of attention in recent tions must be task specific and goal
years because of research advances in directed rather than general and
stem cell and growth factor interven- nonspecific movements. Furthermore,
tions. At this time, it is not con- the goal-directed tasks must be chal-
sidered a standard clinical aspect of lenging and interesting enough to
stroke recovery. Questions still exist maintain an individual’s attention,
regarding the type of stem cell to and the task should allow for repeti-
use, how to deliver it (intravenously, tion through multiple attempts.7Y9
via surgical resection, or endovas-
cularly), dosing, and long-term safety NATURAL HISTORY OF STROKE
effects. Nevertheless, ongoing clinical Most stroke deficits will see the
trials are attempting to answer these highest rate of recovery during the
240 ContinuumJournal.com February 2017
KEY POINTS
h Different functions in the cortex as part of their normal TIMING AND INTENSITY OF
recover differently. functional anatomy.10,11 On the other REHABILITATION
Swallowing, facial hand, cortical functions, such as lan- Uncertainty remains as to the optimal
movement, and gait guage and spatial attention as well as timing and intensity of rehabilitation.
tend to have better dominant hand movement, are more In a study examining differences in
recovery than language lateralized in functional anatomy and outcomes for patients for whom ther-
and dominant hand consequently recover more slowly.10 apy was initiated 20 days apart, a
function. In addition to the limitations of spon- strong inverse relationship between
h Upper extremity motor taneous recovery, multiple factors play the start date and functional outcome
recovery can be predicted a role in the plateau of recovery. Limited was observed, albeit with wide confi-
very early at the bedside therapy or absence of therapy often dence intervals.15 In other words,
through the presence/ leads to learned disuse and hinders those who initiated therapy soon after
absence of voluntary improvement.12 Poststroke depression stroke onset exhibited significantly
finger extension and has been shown to impede recovery higher effectiveness of treatment than
shoulder abduction.
across a variety of measures such as did the medium- or late-initiating groups.
cognitive deficits and mortality. Other Treatment initiated within the first
factors that can hinder recovery include 20 days was associated with a signifi-
side effects of medications, such as cantly higher probability of excellent
excessive benzodiazepine use, and phys- therapeutic response compared to treat-
ical comorbidities, such as cervical ment beginning at 20 or 40 days. These
spine disorders. Neurologists manag- findings should not be surprising given
ing the patient with stroke in the acute, the natural history of stroke recovery
subacute, and chronic settings should as previously discussed.
attempt to ensure that patients are re- Consensus is lacking as to when to
ceiving appropriate therapy and are start rehabilitation after stroke as
periodically screened for depression. specific guidelines for early mobiliza-
Good data exist to predict recovery tion do not exist. Patients with stroke
very soon after stroke onset. Motor who receive thrombolytic therapy are
recovery tends to begin in the proxi- often immobilized for at least 24 hours
mal musculature of the upper and to minimize complications from re-
lower extremities and progresses. combinant tissue plasminogen activa-
The Early Prediction of Functional tor. One reason is that strict blood
Outcome After Stroke (EPOS) study pressure guidelines are placed on
found that recovery of upper extrem- patients after thrombolysis to reduce
ity function at 6 months could be the risk of hemorrhage. Therefore,
accurately predicted if voluntary finger clinicians may be hesitant to increase
extension and shoulder abduction physical activity in these patients for
were present at 48 hours poststroke.13 fear that an elevation in blood pres-
In fact, if these movements were sure may result. In addition, patients
present, the probability of a good treated with endovascular arterial re-
outcome was 98%; if finger extension perfusion are often confined to bedrest
was not present within 48 hours, the to minimize the risk of complications
probability of a good outcome was 25%. related to femoral access. However,
If the movements did not improve prolonged bedrest increases the risk
by day 9 poststroke, the likelihood of of complications related to immobility,
complete upper extremity recovery including pressure sores, aspiration
decreased to 14%.13 Similar predictive pneumonia, and deep vein thrombosis.
models are being developed for recov- In the A Very Early Rehabilitation
ery of lower extremity deficits.14 Trial (AVERT), 2104 patients who were
KEY POINT
h Based on current for those who can tolerate it, increas- unfortunately, many stroke survivors
guidelines, inpatient ing the intensity of rehabilitation in who are uninsured or underinsured,
rehabilitation facilities the rehabilitation/outpatient setting. despite being good candidates for inpa-
are appropriate tient rehabilitation facilities, are dis-
posthospital discharge THERAPY APPROACHES TO charged to a skilled nursing facility.
locations for patients REHABILITATION The importance of posthospital dis-
who are able to actively A goal of stroke rehabilitation should charge disposition on outcomes is
participate in two be to facilitate relearning of skills that discussed later in this article.
disciplines of therapy for were possible before the stroke, but in Rehabilitation is often provided in a
3 hours per day, have some cases the focus of rehabilitation team-based approach and involves
medical issues requiring
must be adaptation and compensation various disciplines, such as physical
physician supervision,
for deficits. This process begins while therapy, occupational therapy, and
and have a reasonable
expectation of resuming
the patient is hospitalized for stroke speech and language therapy. The
community living. and involves motor skill retraining, role of the team involves setting goals,
preventing complications, and teach- reevaluating these goals on a regular
ing adaptive techniques using a com- basis, and making adjustments to the
prehensive approach. In the US health rehabilitation plan as needed. In addi-
care system, stroke survivors in need tion to improving the function of the
of further rehabilitation following the patient, caregiver training is an impor-
acute hospitalization have three pos- tant aspect of rehabilitation.
sible posthospital dispositions: (1) Physical therapists perform evalua-
home with outpatient therapy, (2) tions to detect problems with move-
home with home health therapy, or ment and balance. They work with the
(3) inpatient rehabilitation facility or patient and the rehabilitation team to
skilled nursing facility placement. The perform exercises to strengthen mus-
disposition is based on the nature and cles for walking, standing, and other
severity of deficits, comorbidities, and activities. Occupational therapists help
insurance/reimbursement. For exam- stroke survivors learn strategies to
ple, inpatient rehabilitation facilities manage daily activities such as eating,
are available to patients who are able bathing, dressing, writing, and cook-
to actively participate in at least two ing. One simple way to differentiate
disciplines of therapy (physical ther- between physical and occupational
apy, occupational therapy, or speech therapy is that the focus of physical
and language therapy) for 3 hours therapy is on the lower extremities,
per day, have medical issues requir- while occupational therapy focuses on
ing physician supervision, and have a upper extremity impairments, but it is
reasonable expectation of resuming important to note that this is a gener-
community living. The length of stay alization and there are exceptions and
in these settings is dependent on a nuances in this difference.
variety of factors, including the sever- Speech and language pathologists
ity of neurologic deficits, medical (ie, speech therapists) help stroke
comorbidities, and rehabilitation prog- survivors learn strategies to overcome
ress; on average, the length of stay is swallowing and language deficits. In
about 2 weeks. It is important to note the acute setting, they are involved
that in many areas of the United States, with dysphagia and swallowing evalu-
the presence and type of third-party ations and may make recommenda-
insurance will determine where pa- tions for alternative methods of oral
tients continue rehabilitation following intake, such as nasogastric tubes or
acute hospital discharge. Consequently, percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy
244 ContinuumJournal.com February 2017
KEY POINT
h When patients with inpatient rehabilitation facility have oxetine for Motor Recovery After
stroke are unable to improved outcomes following endo- Acute Ischaemic Stroke (FLAME) trial
return home following vascular therapy compared to those in was a randomized double-blind
their acute hospitalization, a subacute or skilled nursing facility.29 placebo-controlled trial comparing
discharge to an inpatient In a cohort with no significant differ- fluoxetine 20 mg/d and placebo be-
rehabilitation facility ences in age, comorbidities, infarct ginning 5 to 10 days after stroke on-
will likely result in volume, or recanalization rates, pa- set in patients with hemiplegia or
a better outcome. tients who went to a skilled nursing hemiparesis.31 In the intervention
facility had significantly worse out- group, the change in motor func-
comes than those patients who went tion, as measured by the Fugl-Meyer
to an inpatient rehabilitation facility.30 Assessment of Sensorimotor Recov-
These points are important for clini- ery After Stroke score, was significant-
cians to remember when deciding on ly higher than in the placebo group.31
appropriate postacute care and dis- The study results suggest that, rather
charge disposition for patients with than just treating poststroke depres-
stroke as there may be confounders sion (which was addressed in the
and the appropriate destination may trial), selective serotonin reuptake
not be immediately clear. These inhibitors (SSRIs) may also impact
points are illustrated in Case 11-1. motor recovery, likely through neu-
roplastic mechanisms. Other antide-
PHARMACOLOGIC APPROACHES pressant or neuro-modulating agents
TO STROKE REHABILITATION have also been examined with posi-
Medications can also play a role in tive benefits. For example, clinical trials
promoting stroke recovery. The Flu- using cholinesterase inhibitors and
Case 11-1
An 80-year-old woman presented with a right middle cerebral artery
distribution acute ischemic stroke. She received both IV recombinant tissue
plasminogen activator and mechanical thrombectomy. She was admitted
to the hospital for further testing and close monitoring. Despite the acute
therapy she still had deficits from her stroke. On hospital day 3, she was
evaluated by the therapy team and found to be lethargic and participating
poorly in therapy. Because of her lethargy, the therapy team determined
that she was unable to participate in her 3 hours of therapy per day and
recommended skilled nursing facility placement. Evaluation by the primary
team revealed that she had a low-grade fever and leukocytosis and a
urinalysis suggestive of a urinary tract infection. Antibiotics were started,
and she improved over the next 2 days. Her ability to participate in therapy
sessions improved, and the discharge recommendation was upgraded to
an inpatient rehabilitation facility.
Comment. This case is an example of how neurologic status can be
confounded by infection-induced encephalopathy, a condition that is
reversible with appropriate treatment, and illustrates the potential
mutability of posthospital discharge recommendations in a short period
of time. Had the primary team just proceeded with the initial discharge
recommendations and not addressed and treated her confounders to
participation in therapy, and had not pursued a repeat evaluation by
the therapy team, it is likely that her poststroke recovery would have
been compromised.
KEY POINT
h Depression is a common soft tissues. Proper positioning that counteract them. Studies show that
sequela after a stroke includes supporting the distal forearm higher rates of mortality and morbid-
and adversely affects from the elbow down to reduce strain ity are seen in stroke patients diag-
outcomes. Medications at the shoulder reduces the tension nosed with poststroke depression,43,44
such as selective serotonin on the shoulder; slings can be used to while treatment of depression leads to
reuptake inhibitors can provide additional support. Strapping improved functional recovery after
be effectively used in or taping of the upper arm to the stroke. Moreover, by restoring the
the treatment of shoulder and clavicle has been used balance of central neurotransmitters,
poststroke depression. routinely in the management of sub- improving motivation to work with re-
luxation. An intraarticular cortisone habilitation therapists, and increasing
injection (1 mg to 5 mg) into the gle- compliance with medications, treat-
nohumeral joint can be used to treat ment of depression leads to improved
pain in patients with adhesive capsulitis. functional recovery after stroke.
Functional electrostimulation can be SSRIs are the most studied agents
used for muscle contraction and pain for the treatment of poststroke de-
relief. The management of spasticity is pression. Evidence exists for the use
discussed later in this article. of citalopram (20 mg/d), sertraline
(50 mg/d to 100 mg/d), and fluoxetine
Depression (20 mg/d), which are superior to
Poststroke depression is increasingly placebo in treating poststroke depres-
recognized as a common sequela sion and producing improvement in
of stroke. The prevalence of clini- quality-of-life measures.45Y47 Evidence
cally diagnosed poststroke depression also supports the efficacy of tricyclic
ranges from 20% to 40%, and it is antidepressants for the treatment of
likely underdiagnosed.40Y42 The inter- poststroke depression.48 Case 11-2
action between depression and stroke is a clinical example of how post-
recovery is complex, but when de- stroke depression affects recovery and
pression is untreated or undertreated its treatment.
in patients, poststroke recovery is not
optimized. Depression symptoms (eg, Spasticity
fatigue, reduced motivation, loss of Spasticity is a motor disorder generally
confidence, and attention and con- defined as a velocity-dependent in-
centration difficulties) limit the bene- crease in tonic stretch reflexes leading
fits of rehabilitation and can even to increased tone. It is often identified
Case 11-2
A 45-year-old man was admitted to the hospital with a basal ganglia lacunar
stroke. Despite having a small stroke with minimal comorbidities and mild
to moderate deficits, the patient was not improving. His therapists reported
decreased participation and minimal functional gains in therapy sessions.
The patient reported increased fatigue and somnolence, and his family noted
poor engagement and a change in personality. Poststroke depression was
diagnosed. He was started on citalopram 20 mg/d, with gradual improvement
in his mood and other symptoms.
Comment. This case illustrates the importance of screening for poststroke
depression and having a low threshold to treat it. It is important to note
that the effect of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) may not be
seen for 1 to 2 weeks.
KEY POINT
h A formal driving driving ability and that seizure control is CONCLUSION
assessment is helpful compliant with local laws. The medical Stroke rehabilitation is a complex
in determining a clearance evaluation should also assess process that involves multiple health
stroke survivor’s other medical comorbidities, such as care specialties and multiple ap-
ability to drive. cardiac conditions, that could poten- proaches, depending on the nature
tially affect the patient’s driving and of the patient’s deficits. While the
lead to harm for the patient or others timing and dosing of therapy and
on the road. However, more complex novel approaches have not been fully
aspects of driving, such as planning, validated and established, it is clear
motor coordination, and reaction that successful rehabilitation can make
times, are difficult to ascertain in the a positive impact on the outcome of
office. A formal driving assessment stroke survivors. Neurologists can play
can be helpful to evaluate these skills a role in rehabilitation by advising
and can be conducted on a driving sim- patients on the natural history of
ulator or by in-car evaluation by a stroke, ensuring that the appropriate
specialist assessor. therapy and therapy location are
provided, screening for poststroke
EMERGING TECHNIQUES IN depression, and recognizing and man-
STROKE REHABILITATION aging specific issues in stroke rehabil-
Further advances in stroke recovery itation. Stroke rehabilitation is the
and rehabilitation will likely occur in next frontier in stroke care, and phy-
the next decade. On a systems of care sicians involved in this field will have
level, telemedicine is currently playing more knowledge and many more tools
a role in the acute management of at their disposal in the coming years.
stroke but will likely expand to the
recovery phase of stroke (telereha- REFERENCES
bilitation). Telemedicine networks can 1. Ovbiagele B, Goldstein LB, Higashida RT, et al.
be applied to assess and evaluate the Forecasting the future of stroke in the United
rehabilitation needs of patients at home States: a policy statement from the American
Heart Association and American Stroke
or in rural areas where rehabilitation Association. Stroke 2013;44(8):2361Y2375.
resources and expertise may not be doi:10.1161/STR.0b013e31829734f2.
readily available. For patients with re- 2. Dewey HM, Sherry LJ, Collier JM. Stroke
sidual deficits who have exhausted rehabilitation 2007: what should it be? Int J
insurance, telemedicine avenues may Stroke 2007;2(3):191Y200. doi:10.1111/
j.1747-4949.2007.00146.x.
be developed to focus on wellness and
self-training. In a health care system 3. Cumberland Consensus Working Group,
Cheeran B, Cohen L, et al. The future of
that stresses evidence-based medicine, restorative neurosciences in stroke: driving
quality metrics, and cost-containment, the translational research pipeline from basic
rehabilitation strategies that are not only science to rehabilitation of people after
stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2009;23(2):
more clinically effective but also more 97Y107. doi:10.1177/1545968308326636.
cost-effective and efficient are needed.
4. Duncan PW, Lai SM, Keighley J. Defining
Research studies are ongoing to post-stroke recovery: implications for
test the viability of interventions such design and interpretation of drug trials.
as novel pharmacologic agents, stem Neuropharmacology 2000;39(5):835Y841.
cells, brain stimulation, and virtual doi:10.1016/S0028-3908(00)00003-4.
16. Carlsson GE, MPller A, Blomstrand C. A 27. Xu B, Yan T, Yang Y, et al. Effect of
qualitative study of the consequences of normal-walking-pattern-based functional
‘hidden dysfunctions’ one year after a mild electrical stimulation on gait of the lower
stroke in persons G75 years. Disabil Rehabil extremity in subjects with ischemic stroke:
2004;26(23):1373Y1380. doi:10.1080/ a self-controlled study. NeuroRehabilitation
09638280400000211. 2016;38(2):163Y169. doi:10.3233/NRE-161306.
28. Alon G, Levitt AF, McCarthy PA. Functional and characteristics during inpatient stroke
electrical stimulation enhancement of upper rehabilitation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil
extremity functional recovery during stroke 2008;89(8):1589Y1593. doi:10.1016/
rehabilitation: a pilot study. Neurorehabil j.apmr.2007.10.051.
Neural Repair 2007;21(3):207Y215.
40. Robinson RG. Poststroke depression:
doi:10.1177/1545968306297871.
prevalence, diagnosis, treatment, and
29. Deutsch A, Granger CV, Heinemann AW, disease progression. Biol Psychiatry
et al. Poststroke rehabilitation: outcomes 2003;54(3):376Y387. doi:10.1016/
and reimbursement of inpatient rehabilitation S0006-3223(03)00423-2.
facilities and subacute rehabilitation programs.
41. Hackett ML, Yapa C, Parag V, Anderson CS.
Stroke 2006;37(6):1477Y1482. doi:10.1161/
Frequency of depression after stroke: a
01.STR.0000221172.99375.5a.
systematic review of observational studies.
30. Belagaje SR, Sun CH, Nogueira RG, et al. Stroke 2005;36(6):1330Y1340. doi:10.1161/
Discharge disposition to skilled nursing 01.STR.0000165928.19135.35.
facility after endovascular reperfusion therapy
42. de Man-van Ginkel JM, Gooskens F,
predicts a poor prognosis. J Neurointerv
Schuurmans MJ, et al. A systematic review
Surg 2015;7(2):99Y103. doi:10.1136/
of therapeutic interventions for poststroke
neurintsurg-2013-011045.
depression and the role of nurses. J Clin Nurs
31. Chollet F, Tardy J, Albucher JF, et al. 19(23Y24):3274Y3290. doi:10.1111/
Fluoxetine for motor recovery after acute j.1365-2702.2010.03402.x.
ischaemic stroke (FLAME): a randomised
43. Robinson RG, Bolduc PL, Price TR. Two-year
placebo-controlled trial. Lancet Neurol
2011;10(2):123Y130. doi:10.1016/ longitudinal study of poststroke mood
S1474-4422(10)70314-8. disorders: diagnosis and outcome at one
and two years. Stroke 1987;18(5):837Y843.
32. Hong JM, Shin DH, Lim TS, et al. doi:10.1161/01.STR.18.5.837.
Galantamine administration in chronic
post-stroke aphasia. J Neurol Neurosurg 44. Herrmann N, Black SE, Lawrence J, et al.
Psychiatry 2012;83(7):675Y680. doi:10.1136/ The Sunnybrook Stroke Study: a prospective
study of depressive symptoms and functional
jnnp-2012-302268.
outcome. Stroke 1998;29(3):618Y624.
33. Berthier M, Green C, Higueras C, et al. doi:10.1161/01.STR.29.3.618.
A randomized, placebo-controlled study of
donepezil in poststroke aphasia. Neurology 45. Andersen G, Vestergaard K, Lauritzen L.
2006;67(9):1687Y1689. doi:10.1212/ Effective treatment of poststroke depression
01.wnl.0000242626.69666.e2. with the selective serotonin reuptake
inhibitor citalopram. Stroke 1994;25(6):
34. Berthier ML, Green C, Lara JP, et al. Memantine
1099Y1104. doi:10.1161/01.STR.25.6.1099.
and constraint-induced aphasia therapy in
chronic poststroke aphasia. Ann Neurol 46. Rasmussen A, Lunde M, Poulsen DL, et al.
2009;65(5):577Y585. doi:10.1002/ana.21597. A double-blind, placebo-controlled study of
sertraline in the prevention of depression in
35. Gorgoraptis N, Mah YH, Machner B, et al.
stroke patients. Psychosomatics 2003;44(3):
The effects of the dopamine agonist
216Y221. doi:10.1176/appi.psy.44.3.216.
rotigotine on hemispatial neglect following
stroke. Brain 2012;135(pt 8):2478Y2491. 47. Fruehwald S, Gatterbauer E, Rehak P,
doi:10.1093/brain/aws154. Baumhackl U. Early fluoxetine treatment of
post-stroke depressionVa three-month
36. Kohno N, Abe S, Toyoda G, et al. Successful
double-blind placebo-controlled study with
treatment of post-stroke apathy by the
an open-label long-term follow up. J Neurol
dopamine receptor agonist ropinirole. J Clin
2003;250(3):347Y351. doi:10.1007/
Neurosci 2010;17(6):804Y806. doi:10.1016/
s00415-003-1014-3.
j.jocn.2009.09.043.
48. Lauritzen L, Bendsen BB, Vilmar T, et al.
37. Goldstein LB. Potential effects of common
Post-stroke depression: combined treatment
drugs on stroke recovery. Arch Neurol
with imipramine or desipramine and
1998;55(4):454Y456. doi:10.1001/
mianserin. A controlled clinical study.
archneur.55.4.454.
Psychopharmacology (Berl) 1994;114(1):
38. Chang M, Saito H, Abe K. Cimetidine inhibits 119Y122. doi:10.1007/BF02245452.
the induction of long-term potentiation in
49. Welmer AK, von Arbin M, Widén Holmqvist L,
the dentate gyrus of rats in vivo. Jpn J Pharmacol
Sommerfeld DK. Spasticity and its association
1997;74(3):281Y283. doi:10.1254/jjp.74.281.
with functioning and health-related quality
39. Dromerick AW, Edwards DF, Kumar A. of life 18 months after stroke. Cerebrovasc
Hemiplegic shoulder pain syndrome: frequency Dis 2006;21(4):247Y253. doi:10.1159/000091222.
Abstract
Purpose of Review:
Death from stroke has decreased over the past decade, with stroke now the fifth leading cause
of death in the United States. In addition, the incidence of new and recurrent stroke is
declining, likely because of the increased use of specific prevention medications, such as statins
and antihypertensives. Despite these positive trends in incidence and mortality, many strokes
remain preventable. The major modifiable risk factors are hypertension, diabetes mellitus,
tobacco smoking, and hyperlipidemia, as well as lifestyle factors, such as obesity, poor
diet/nutrition, and physical inactivity. This article reviews the current recommendations for
the management of each of these modifiable risk factors.
Recent Findings:
It has been documented that some blood pressure medications may increase variability of
blood pressure and ultimately increase the risk for stroke. Stroke prevention typically includes
antiplatelet therapy (unless an indication for anticoagulation exists), so the most recent
evidence supporting use of these drugs is reviewed. In addition, emerging risk factors, such
as obstructive sleep apnea, electronic cigarettes, and elevated lipoprotein (a), are discussed.
Summary:
Overall, secondary stroke prevention includes a multifactorial approach. This article incorporates
evidence from guidelines and published studies and uses an illustrative case study throughout the
article to provide examples of secondary prevention management of stroke risk factors.
Key Points
& Stroke incidence and mortality have declined in recent decades, correlating with
improved risk factor management.
Key Points
& Establishing time of stroke onset, or last known well time, starts the clock on all further
decision making for the patient with acute stroke. Confirming last known well time
with the patient or a reliable witness, or identifying an associated event, is key to
informing accurate treatment decisions going forward.
& Symptom chronology is an important feature to help distinguish acute stroke from
common stroke mimics. Stroke tends to be abrupt and maximal at onset, with the
exception of stuttering transient ischemic attacks or small vessel strokes that may
fluctuate in intensity in the acute period.
& Patients with acute stroke with decreased level of consciousness or respiratory distress
may require rapid intubation. Prior to sedation, rapid assessment of pupillary
function, gaze deviation, blink to threat, motor tone, and purposeful movements can
help formulate the neurologic syndrome.
& Patients in atrial fibrillation with focal neurologic deficits should be assumed to have
cardioembolic ischemic stroke until proven otherwise. Inquiring about anticoagulation
and medication compliance in the acute stroke history is essential to informing an
appropriate treatment decision.
& The National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale is biased toward left hemispheric and
anterior circulation strokes. Therefore, careful vigilance should be employed when
assessing stroke severity in patients with nondominant, right hemisphere, brainstem,
or isolated cerebellar strokes to guide treatment.
& Evidence-based guidelines suggest the only laboratory test absolutely required prior
to initiation of IV recombinant tissue plasminogen activator is a finger-stick blood
glucose. Other laboratory tests, such as complete blood cell count and metabolic
panel, should not delay head CT or initiation of IV recombinant tissue plasminogen
activator. Exceptions include patients taking warfarin or with known hematologic
abnormalities, for whom rapid coagulation profiling is warranted. Obtaining proper
vascular access in the emergency department may also delay door-to-CT time, so using
prehospital access or point-of-care testing may be beneficial.
& Strokes involving the frontal eye fields create a conjugate deviation of the eyes to the
ipsilateral ischemic hemisphere, ie, ‘‘looking at your stroke.’’
& The classic left middle cerebral artery syndrome presents with left gaze preference, right
visual field cut, aphasia, and right hemiparesis/hemianesthesia.
& Determining handedness in patients with stroke is key to defining hemispheric dominance
and characterizing stroke syndromes. Only a minority of primarily left-handed
individuals are right hemisphere dominant for language.
& Listening intently for phonemic or semantic paraphasic errors is important to recognize
subtle aphasia in the patient with acute stroke.
& Diagnosing aphasia from other forms of encephalopathy may be distinguished by a
patient’s level of attentiveness.
Abstract
Purpose of Review:
This article provides an update on the state of the art of the emergency treatment of acute ischemic
stroke with particular emphasis on the alternatives for reperfusion therapy.
Recent Findings:
The results of several randomized controlled trials consistently and conclusively demonstrating
that previously functional patients with disabling strokes from a proximal intracranial artery
occlusion benefit from prompt recanalization with mechanical thrombectomy using a retrievable
stent have changed the landscape of acute stroke therapy. Mechanical thrombectomy within
6 hours of symptom onset should now be considered the preferred treatment for these patients
along with IV thrombolysis with recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rtPA) within the
first 4.5 hours for all patients who do not have contraindications for systemic thrombolysis.
Patients who are ineligible for IV rtPA can also benefit from mechanical thrombectomy.
Collateral status and time to reperfusion are the main determinants of outcome.
Summary:
Timely successful reperfusion is the most effective treatment for patients with acute ischemic
stroke. Systems of care should be optimized to maximize the number of patients with acute
ischemic stroke able to receive reperfusion therapy.
& Prompt reperfusion is the most effective treatment for patients with acute ischemic stroke.
& The three principles of acute stroke therapy are to achieve recanalization of the occluded
vessel (and reperfusion of the ischemic tissue), to optimize collateral flow, and to
avoid secondary brain injury.
& The ischemic penumbra is the region of hypoperfused brain that can still be viable with
prompt recanalization of the occluded artery.
& Collateral flow is responsible for the temporary preservation of the ischemic penumbra.
& No neuroprotective agent has been proven to be beneficial for acute ischemic stroke
in clinical trials.
& IV thrombolysis with rtPA and endovascular thrombectomy with a retrievable stent are both
solidly established treatments for appropriate candidates with acute ischemic stroke.
& Time to reperfusion is a major determinant of outcome in acute ischemic stroke.
& Randomized placebo-controlled trials have demonstrated that IV thrombolysis with rtPA is
beneficial for patients with acute ischemic stroke up to 4.5 hours from symptom onset.
& Some previously cited contraindications for IV thrombolysis have been revisited, thus
expanding the pool of patients who can be considered good candidates for this treatment.
& Benefit from IV thrombolysis is much greater in the first 90 minutes from symptom onset.
& Most cases of symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage are caused by reperfusion injury
causing hemorrhagic transformation of an already severe stroke.
& Six recent randomized controlled trials have conclusively proven that endovascular
therapy with mechanical thrombectomy improves functional outcomes in patients with
acute stroke from a proximal intracranial artery occlusion (internal carotid artery, M1 or
M2 segments) when the intervention is performed within 6 hours of symptom onset.
& Candidates for endovascular stroke therapy are patients with severe neurologic
symptoms, no major ischemic changes on the baseline CT scan, good prestroke functional
status, and early presentation.
& Mechanical thrombectomy can be attempted when IV thrombolysis does not result in
rapid clinical improvement and also in patients who are ineligible for IV rtPA.
& Careful assessment of brain imaging is necessary to exclude a large established
infarction (core).
& The optimal radiologic method to select candidates for endovascular therapy is not yet
established, but the Alberta Stroke Programs Early CT Score, evaluation of collaterals on
CT angiography, and CT perfusion or MRI diffusion/perfusion are all available options.
& Endovascular interventions for acute stroke should be performed under conscious
sedation whenever possible.
& Patients with wake-up strokes and those with stroke of unknown time of onset might
benefit from acute reperfusion if a large infarct core can be reliably excluded.
& It is prudent not to administer IV thrombolysis in patients taking the novel oral
anticoagulants (dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban, edoxaban) because readily available
tests in the emergency department cannot quantify the degree of active anticoagulation.
& Patients with mild or rapidly improving strokes who present within the time window
for IV thrombolysis and still have disabling symptoms at the time of the evaluation should
probably be offered treatment with rtPA.
& Although patients with basilar artery occlusion were not included in the randomized
controlled trials of IV thrombolysis or mechanical thrombectomy, these patients should
be treated with acute reperfusion therapies because of their dismal prognosis if
recanalization cannot be achieved.
Abstract
Purpose of Review:
This article reviews the diagnosis, investigation, and recommended management after a
transient ischemic attack (TIA) and discusses how to make an accurate diagnosis, including
the diagnosis of mimics of TIAs.
Recent Findings:
Up to a 10% risk of recurrent stroke exists after a TIA, and up to 80% of this risk is preventable
with urgent assessment and treatment. Imaging of the brain and intracranial and extracranial
blood vessels using CT, CT angiography, carotid Doppler ultrasound, and MRI is an important
part of the diagnostic assessment. Treatment options include anticoagulation for atrial fibrillation,
carotid revascularization for symptomatic carotid artery stenosis, antiplatelet therapy, and
vascular risk factor reduction strategies.
Summary:
TIA offers the greatest opportunity to prevent stroke that physicians encounter. A TIA should be
treated as a medical emergency, as up to 80% of strokes after TIA are preventable.
Key Points
& Minor ischemic stroke and transient ischemic attack should be managed similarly.
& Making the correct diagnosis of transient ischemic attack is key, as 50% of patients
assessed for possible transient ischemic attack will have an alternative diagnosis
(ie, are a mimic).
& Atrial fibrillation is a common cause of transient ischemic attack and ischemic stroke.
& All patients with possible transient ischemic attack require structural imaging of the brain
to rule out mimics.
& Urgent imaging using CT/CT angiography can identify patients at high risk for recurrent
stroke.
& Although the presence of a lesion seen on diffusion-weighted imaging can be helpful by
proving that ischemia occurred, the absence of a lesion does not rule out ischemia.
& Finding out why a transient ischemic attack occurred is the key to preventing a
recurrent stroke.
& Recognition and management of transient ischemic attack offers the greatest opportunity
to prevent disabling stroke.
Abstract
Purpose of Review:
This article provides a synopsis of the immediate and delayed medical complications of stroke,
with an emphasis on prevention and management of these complications.
Recent Findings:
Meta-analysis of the trials for endovascular treatment of acute stroke shows no significant
increase in hemorrhagic events. Rehabilitation guidelines published by the American Heart
Association and American Stroke Association in 2016 aid in providing the best clinical practice
for patients with stroke, from the time of their initial hospitalization to their return to
the community.
Summary:
Medical complications from stroke are common and are associated with poor clinical outcomes,
increased length of hospital stays and higher rates of readmission, increased cost of care, delayed
time to rehabilitation, and increased mortality. Being cognizant of the common complications
encountered, taking appropriate measures to prevent them, and knowing how to manage them
when they do occur are essential to the continued care of patients with stroke.
Key Points
& Angioedema resulting from use of recombinant tissue plasminogen activator often
involves the unilateral tongue and lips contralateral to the side of the infarct. It is often
mild and transient, but in severe cases, IV recombinant tissue plasminogen activator
should be stopped immediately and anaphylaxis appropriately treated.
& The peak incidence of deep venous thrombosis formation is in the first week after stroke,
while pulmonary embolism is most commonly seen in weeks 2 to 4. Prevention of deep
venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism starts with early initiation of venous
thromboembolism prophylaxis.
& Patients with stroke who are at high risk of developing deep venous thrombosis and
pulmonary embolism include those who are immobilized, dehydrated, or elderly
and those who have a history of malignancy, previous deep venous thrombosis, or
clotting disorders.
& Contraindications to unfractionated heparin or low-molecular-weight heparin for deep
venous thrombosis prophylaxis or therapy for symptomatic deep venous thrombosis
or pulmonary embolism include intracranial hemorrhage, recent thrombolytic therapy,
and active extracranial hemorrhage. Alternatives include intermittent pneumatic
compression or aspirin for prophylaxis and inferior vena cava filter or surgical
embolectomy for symptomatic deep venous thrombosis or pulmonary embolism.
Cardioembolic Stroke
Cumara B. O’Carroll, MD, MPH; Kevin M. Barrett, MD, MSc. Continuum (Minneap Minn).
February 2017; 23 (1 Cerebrovascular Disease):111Y132.
Abstract
Purpose of Review:
Cardioembolic stroke is common and disproportionately more disabling than nonembolic
mechanisms of stroke. Its incidence is expected to rise because of the age-related incidence of
atrial fibrillation and an aging population. This article summarizes the different causes of
cardioembolism and outlines current management guidelines.
Recent Findings:
Since cardioembolic stroke is not a single disease entity, its diagnosis requires initial clinical
suspicion and a comprehensive evaluation, including ECG, echocardiography, brain imaging,
and cardiac monitoring. Atrial fibrillation is the most common cause of cardioembolic stroke, and
anticoagulation is usually recommended. This article reviews risk stratification models to assist in
the decision-making process and highlights the increased use of novel oral anticoagulants for
stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation. New data support the importance of prolonged cardiac
monitoring for diagnosing occult atrial fibrillation. Current data on other mechanisms of
cardioembolic stroke, such as prosthetic heart valves and aortic arch atherosclerosis, are also
presented, and the available evidence regarding patent foramen ovale closure in cryptogenic
stroke is summarized.
Summary:
Cardioembolism is an important cause of ischemic stroke, with diverse underlying mechanisms
requiring a tailored approach to diagnosis, management, and prevention.
Abstract
Purpose of Review:
Extracranial or intracranial large artery atherosclerosis is often identified as a potential etiologic
cause for ischemic stroke and transient ischemic attack. Given the high prevalence of large
artery atherosclerosis in the general population, determining whether an identified atherosclerotic
lesion is truly the cause of a patient’s symptomatology can be difficult. In all cases, optimally
treating each patient to minimize future stroke risk is paramount. Extracranial or intracranial large
artery atherosclerosis can be broadly compartmentalized into four distinct clinical scenarios
based upon the individual patient’s history, examination, and anatomic imaging findings:
asymptomatic and symptomatic extracranial carotid stenosis, intracranial atherosclerosis, and
extracranial vertebral artery atherosclerotic disease. This review provides a framework for
clinicians evaluating and treating such patients.
Recent Findings:
Intensive medical therapy achieves low rates of stroke and death in asymptomatic carotid
stenosis. Evidence indicates that patients with severe symptomatic carotid stenosis should
undergo carotid revascularization sooner rather than later and that the risk of stroke or death
is lower using carotid endarterectomy than with carotid stenting. Specific to stenting, the risk
of stroke or death is greatest among older patients and women. Continuous vascular risk
factor optimization via sustained behavioral modifications and intensive medical therapy is
the mainstay for stroke prevention in the setting of intracranial and vertebral artery
origin atherosclerosis.
Key Points
& Continuous vascular risk factor optimization via sustained behavioral modifications
and intensive medical therapy is critical to prevent stroke in the setting of large artery
atherosclerosis.
& It is important to determine if the identified large artery atherosclerotic lesion is proximal
to a vascular territory that corresponds to the patient’s stroke on imaging or symptoms
in the setting of a transient ischemic attack.
& Population-wide improved control of hypertension, dyslipidemia, and diabetes mellitus,
coupled with a reduction in tobacco use, has resulted in a decline in stroke mortality
from the third to the fifth leading cause of death in the United States.
& Hypertension and diabetes mellitus remain undertreated, and personalized approaches
to lifestyle changes and medical therapy are critical for successful stroke prevention.
& Physicians should consider each patient on an individual basis, working to optimize
their risk factor profile over the long term while inferring upon the most recent
professional society statement recommendations.
& Current surgical best practice restricts carotid endarterectomy for asymptomatic
carotid stenosis to patients with 70% or greater carotid stenosis if the surgery can be
performed with a 3% or less risk of perioperative complications.
& As consistent with recent guidelines, patients with asymptomatic carotid stenosis should
be prescribed a daily aspirin and statin and screened for other treatable risk factors
with appropriate medical therapies and lifestyle changes instituted.
& For patients with a transient ischemic attack or ischemic stroke within the past 6 months
and ipsilateral severe (70% to 99%) carotid artery stenosis, carotid endarterectomy is
recommended; for those with moderate (50% to 69%) carotid stenosis, carotid
endarterectomy is recommended depending on patient-specific factors, such as age, sex,
and comorbidities; and for those with a degree of stenosis of less than 50%, carotid
endarterectomy and carotid artery stenting are not recommended.
& The optimal timing of carotid revascularization via carotid endarterectomy after
a completed nondisabling stroke has been defined to be within 2 weeks if no
contraindications exist.
& Carotid artery stenting can be considered as an alternative to carotid endarterectomy
for patients who are symptomatic with greater than 70% stenosis if the anticipated rate
of periprocedural stroke or death is less than 6%; age should be considered when
choosing between carotid endarterectomy and carotid artery stenting.
& For patients who are older (70 years of age or older), carotid endarterectomy may be
associated with improved outcome compared with carotid artery stenting, in particular
when arterial anatomy is unfavorable for endovascular intervention. For patients who
are younger, carotid artery stenting is equivalent to carotid endarterectomy in terms of risk
for periprocedural complications (eg, stroke, myocardial infarction, or death) and
long-term risk for ipsilateral stroke.
Abstract
Purpose of Review:
This article reviews risk factors, recurrence risk, evaluation, management, and outcomes
of arterial ischemic stroke in children and young adults.
Recent Findings:
The risk for recurrence and mortality appear to be low for neonatal and childhood stroke.
Most children have relatively mild deficits, but those who have greater neurologic deficits,
poststroke epilepsy, or strokes early in life are at risk for lower overall cognitive function. Stroke
recurrence and long-termmortality after stroke in young adults are greater than originally thought.
Cognitive impairments, depression, and anxiety are associated with higher levels of poststroke
unemployment and represent targets for improved poststroke care. Poststroke care in young
adults involves more than medical management. Self-reported memory and executive function
impairments may be more severe than what is detected by objective measures. Assessment of
possible cognitive impairments and appropriate management of psychological comorbidities are
key to maximizing the long-term functional outcome of stroke survivors.
Summary:
Childhood and young adult stroke survivors survive for many more years than older patients
with stroke. To ensure that these survivors maximize the productivity of their lives, neurologists
must not only optimize medical management but also recognize that impairments in
cognition and mood may be remediable barriers to long-term functional independence.
& In children, the group with the highest incidence of ischemic stroke is neonates, where
the estimated incidence ranges from 1 in 4400 to 1 in 7700 live births.
& Strokes also occur in utero. While the incidence is unknown, the US prevalence of
cerebral palsy is 3.1 per 1000 children at eight years of age. Unilateral spasticity accounts
for 19% to 35% of the total, and many of these cases are due to in utero stroke.
& The relative rarity of ischemic stroke in children and young adults contributes to delays
in diagnosis.
& The striking difference between stroke in children and young adults is the pattern of
identified risk factors and associated diseases.
& In neonatal stroke, the immediate recurrence risk appears to be very low, unless a
congenital heart lesion associated with cardiogenic embolism or a hypercoagulable
disorder associated with systemic thrombosis exists.
& Brain imaging is essential in children to confirm the presence of an ischemic stroke and
to rule out a hemorrhagic stroke, but each modality has benefits and disadvantages
to consider.
& The authors offer thrombophilia testing to patients with childhood-onset stroke,
particularly when other risk factors are not identified and after discussing risks and
benefits of such testing with the patient and family. Testing is typically done acutely and
repeated at 3 months if specific abnormalities are identified.
& Since the recurrence risk formost neonatal arterial ischemic stroke appears to be low,
neonates are not typically treated with antithrombotic agents.
& In children who sustained a stroke after the neonatal period, treatment to prevent recurrent
stroke varies with the associated condition.
& Secondary stroke prevention in young adults involves encouraging the same lifestyle
changes as in older adults: avoiding smoking, increasing physical activity, making
dietary modifications to achieve weight loss, and avoiding recreational drugs,
especially cocaine. Aggressive treatment of hypertension, dyslipidemias, and diabetes
mellitus are also obvious targets. These secondary prevention measures are particularly
important in young adults because of their longer potential lifespan and the significant
risk of recurring vascular events over that longer lifespan.
& Similar to neonates, few studies of long-term outcome after stroke have been conducted in
older children.
& In a prospective cohort study of 7 years of follow-up data for children after a stroke,
mortality was 14% overall, and 6% had a recurrent stroke. Fifty-five percent had a
hemiparesis, although most (49% of those affected) were mild in severity, and
21% had speech impairments, but again, most (59% of those affected) were mild.
Parents reported that 15% of the children had some type of psychological or
psychiatric disorder.
& Interest is growing in the outcome of young adults who have had stroke, but the number of
studies with long-term follow-up is relatively small.
& A Dutch study of outcomes 9 years after the incident stroke found that 10% of young
adult ischemic stroke survivors were functioning at a modified Rankin Scale score of
3 to 5 and 27% were dead. As a group, stroke survivors performed worse than controls in
objective measures of processing speed, working and immediate memory, delayed
memory, attention, and executive function. Depressive symptoms were present in 16%
of men and 23% of women, compared with 6% in controls. Anxiety was present in 15% of
men and 29% of women, compared with 12% of controls.
Abstract
Purpose of Review:
Unruptured intracranial aneurysms and vascular malformations are detected more frequently
because of the increased use and availability of brain imaging. Management of these entities
requires knowledge of which patients are at high risk for hemorrhage and what treatment options
are available. This article summarizes the epidemiology, natural history, and management
strategies for unruptured intracranial aneurysms, arteriovenous malformations, cavernous
malformations, developmental venous anomalies, and capillary telangiectasias.
Recent Findings:
Pooled cohort studies and meta-analyses have improved the ability to predict hemorrhage for
each vascular abnormality. Scores and tools have been developed to aid the practitioner in
predicting hemorrhage risk for unruptured intracranial aneurysms. Advances in endovascular
techniques for unruptured intracranial aneurysms have improved the ability to treat difficult
wide-necked aneurysms.
Summary:
Unruptured intracranial aneurysms are a common incidental finding. The PHASES (population,
hypertension, age, size of aneurysm, earlier subarachnoid hemorrhage from another aneurysm,
site of aneurysm) score and Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysm Treatment Score may be
useful tools for predicting natural history and treatment recommendations. The overall risk of
hemorrhage for both arteriovenous malformations and cavernous malformations is about 2%
to 4% per year. With both of these entities, prior hemorrhage predicts future hemorrhage. In
addition, other select patient and radiologic factors influence risk of hemorrhage. The risk of future
hemorrhage should be compared to the risk of treatment. Developmental venous anomalies and
capillary telangiectasias are largely benign entities and rarely symptomatic.
Key Points
& Rare disorders such as polycystic kidney disease and coarctation of the aorta may
predispose patients to unruptured intracranial aneurysm formation.
& Unruptured intracranial aneurysms are more common in women, tobacco users, and
patients with hypertension.
& In the United States, the prevalence of unruptured intracranial aneurysms is
3000 per 100,000, and the prevalence of subarachnoid hemorrhage is 10 per 100,000.
Thus, themajority of unruptured intracranial aneurysms do not rupture.
Abstract
Purpose of Review:
This article is a practical guide to identifying uncommon causes of stroke and offers guidance
for evaluation and management, even when large controlled trials are lacking in these rarer
forms of stroke.
Recent Findings:
Fabry disease causes early-onset stroke, particularly of the vertebrobasilar system; enzyme
replacement therapy should be considered in affected patients. Cerebral autosomal dominant
arteriopathy with subcortical infarcts and leukoencephalopathy (CADASIL), often misdiagnosed
as multiple sclerosis, causes migraines, early-onset lacunar strokes, and dementia. Moyamoya
disease can cause either ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke; revascularization is recommended in
some patients. Cerebral amyloid angiopathy causes both microhemorrhages and
macrohemorrhages, resulting in typical stroke symptoms and progressive dementia. Pregnancy
raises the risk of both ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke, particularly in women with preeclampsia/
eclampsia. Pregnant women are also at risk for posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome
(PRES), reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome, and cerebral venous sinus thrombosis.
Experts recommend that pregnant women with acute ischemic stroke not be systematically denied
the potential benefits of IV recombinant tissue plasminogen activator.
Summary:
Neurologists should become familiar with these uncommon causes of stroke to provide future risk
assessment and family counseling and to implement appropriate treatment plans to prevent
recurrence.
Key Points
& Fabry disease is an X-linked lysosomal storage disease with neurovascular manifestations
of early-onset ischemic stroke, often in the posterior circulation; dilatation of the
vertebrobasilar vessels up to extensive dolichoectasia; and leukoaraiosis.
& Fabry disease is a multisystemic disorder, causing acroparesthesia, angiokeratomas,
corneal dystrophy, hypohidrosis, renal impairment, cardiac conduction disturbances,
and cardiomyopathy.
& Fabry disease is most easily diagnosed by a readily available and standardized enzymatic
test that measures leukocyte >-galactosidase A activity. However, women may require
molecular genetic testing or skin biopsy because of normal to low enzymatic testing.
& Recombinant >-galactosidase A is available as enzyme replacement therapy for Fabry
disease and is recommended by experts for all patients with Fabry disease with affected
Stroke Rehabilitation
Samir R. Belagaje, MD. Continuum (Minneap Minn). February 2017;23(1 Cerebrovascular
Disease):238Y253.
Abstract
Purpose of Review:
Rehabilitation is an important aspect of the continuum of care in stroke. With advances in the
acute treatment of stroke, more patients will survive stroke with varying degrees of disability.
Research in the past decade has expanded our understanding of the mechanisms underlying
stroke recovery and has led to the development of new treatment modalities. This article reviews
and summarizes the key concepts related to poststroke recovery.
Recent Findings:
Good data now exist by which one can predict recovery, especially motor recovery, very
soon after stroke onset. Recent trials have not demonstrated a clear benefit associated with
very early initiation of rehabilitative therapy after stroke in terms of improvement in
poststroke outcomes. However, growing evidence suggests that shorter and more frequent
sessions of therapy can be safely started in the first 24 to 48 hours after a stroke. The optimal
amount or dose of therapy for stroke remains undetermined, as more intensive treatments
have not been associated with better outcomes compared to standard intensities of therapy.
Poststroke depression adversely affects recovery across a variety of measures and is an
Summary:
A comprehensive rehabilitation programis essential to optimize poststroke outcomes.
Rehabilitation is a process that uses three major principles of recovery: adaptation, restitution, and
neuroplasticity. Based on these principles, multiple different approaches, both pharmacologic
and nonpharmacologic, exist to enhance rehabilitation. In addition to neurologists, a variety of
health care professionals are involved in stroke rehabilitation. Successful rehabilitation involves
understanding the natural history of stroke recovery and amultidisciplinary approach with
judicious use of resources to identify and treat common poststroke sequelae.
Key Points
& Rehabilitation is a process of stroke care that reduces disability and improves
participation in therapy. Recovery is defined as improvements across a variety
of outcomes.
& The human brain recovers from a stroke through adaptation, regeneration, and
neuroplasticity.
& Neuroplasticity is driven by principles of task specificity, repetition, and challenge.
& Different functions recover differently. Swallowing, facial movement, and gait tend
to have better recovery than language and dominant hand function.
& Upper extremity motor recovery can be predicted very early at the bedside through
the presence/absence of voluntary finger extension and shoulder abduction.
& The generally accepted practice for stroke rehabilitation at this time involves using less
intense therapy in the acute/hyperacute setting and increasing the intensity for those
who can tolerate it in the rehabilitation/outpatient setting.
& Based on current guidelines, inpatient rehabilitation facilities are appropriate
posthospital discharge locations for patients who are able to actively participate in
two disciplines of therapy for 3 hours per day, have medical issues requiring physician
supervision, and have a reasonable expectation of resuming community living.
& Constraint-induced movement therapy is an alternative motor rehabilitation therapy
technique for the upper extremity in which the unaffected extremity is constrained
with a mitt, thereby forcing use of the affected hand.
& Melodic intonation therapy is an alternative therapy technique that has been shown to
enhance recovery of poststroke aphasia. It involves the use of musical elements,
including melody and rhythm, to improve language production.
& When patients with stroke are unable to return home following their acute
hospitalization, discharge to an inpatient rehabilitation facility will likely result in a
better outcome.
& Caution and careful consideration must be used when prescribing antiepileptic
medications and antihistaminergic medications as they may adversely affect
stroke recovery.
& Shoulder pain is a common sequela after a stroke and may be caused by a variety
of conditions.
Discussing
Address correspondence to
Dr David Y. Hwang, Division
of Neurocritical Care and
Emergency Neurology,
Department of Neurology, Yale
School of Medicine, PO Box
208018, New Haven, CT 06520,
Life-sustaining Therapy
[email protected].
Relationship Disclosure:
Dr Hwang has received
With Surrogate
personal compensation for
speaking engagements for the
Mayo Clinic and The
Pennsylvania State University
Decision Makers
and research/grant support David Y. Hwang, MD
from the American Brain
Foundation, the Apple Pickers
Foundation, the Neurocritical
Care Society, and the National ABSTRACT
Institute on Aging, via its Loan Clinicians caring for patients with severe stroke in intensive care units often grapple with
Repayment Program.
Unlabeled Use of
requests from surrogate decision makers for life-prolonging treatment that members of
Products/Investigational the care team may believe to be futile. An example is a surrogate decision maker’s request
Use Disclosure: Dr Hwang to place a tracheostomy and feeding tube in a patient who, in the clinical judgment
reports no disclosure.
of the neurocritical care team, is very unlikely to recover interactive capacity. This article
B 2017 American Academy
of Neurology. presents a case, discusses definitions of medical futility, and summarizes recommended
steps for mediating conflict regarding potentially inappropriate treatment.
Case
A 46-year-old man with an extensive past medical history, including
insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus, chronic kidney disease, severe coronary
artery disease status postYcoronary artery bypass grafting, peripheral
vascular disease, and prior hypertensive cerebellar hemorrhage that required
decompressive craniectomy 10 years previously, sustained a devastating
occlusion of the basilar artery that could not be revascularized. He was
admitted to the neurocritical care unit in a coma and on mechanical
ventilation, with an MRI of the brain revealing restricted diffusion not only in
the majority of the midbrain and bilateral posterior cerebral artery vascular
territories but also in scattered areas of both middle cerebral artery
territories, indicative of an embolic shower likely of cardioembolic origin.
The neurocritical care team held several meetings with the patient’s
wife, during which the team told her that the patient’s prognosis for a
meaningful neurologic recovery was poor and introduced options for
limitations of life-sustaining therapy. The patient’s wife repeatedly told
the neurocritical care unit team that she wanted ‘‘everything done’’ and
was unwilling even to consider a do-not-resuscitate order. The patient had
no advance directive.
During the second week of hospitalization, the patient developed
worsening acute renal failure and gradually became more oliguric. A
consulting nephrologist told the neurocritical care team he was unwilling
to offer dialysis to the patient because his medical situation was ‘‘futile.’’
The neurocritical care team had further meetings with the patient’s
wife, who not only repeated her desire to have ‘‘everything done’’ but
Continued on page 255
DISCUSSION
Clinicians who care for patients with severe stroke in neurocritical care units will
inevitably encounter surrogate decision makers who request aggressive care
that the clinicians believe should not be offered.1 An awareness of professional
consensus for best practices in such situations is critical for an ethical resolu-
tion to the conflict. The American Thoracic Society recently released a statement
of updated recommendations for clinicians involved in such disputes.2 This
policy statement, which was released after input and approval from the American
Association for Critical Care Nurses (AACN), the American College of Chest
Physicians (ACCP), the European Society for Intensive Care Medicine (ESICM),
and the Society of Critical Care Medicine (SCCM), is the framework for the
discussion that follows.
Definitions
Futile care has had multiple formal definitions in the medical literature, rang-
ing from interventions for which ‘‘reasoning and experience indicate that the
intervention[s] would be highly unlikely to result in meaningful survival,’’3 to
those that ‘‘will not accomplish their intended goal, ie, treatments that have no
beneficial physiologic effect.’’4 This case is an example of the first definition,
which some may label as quality-of-life futility. A concrete example of the second
narrower definition of futility would be a situation in which the wife in this case
requests that the medical team administer antibiotics to cure her husband of
his stroke. Drawing a distinction between the two definitions is important, as it
is generally agreed that clinicians should neither offer nor provide strictly
futile care under any circumstances. For situations in which medical interventions
requested by a surrogate may indeed prolong a patient’s life but which clinicians
have ethical concerns in providing, the American Thoracic Society guidelines
recommend using the term potentially inappropriate treatment. This phrase
not only draws a distinction between these situations and strict futility but also
acknowledges that such judgments from clinicians are indeed preliminary and may
be subject to an institutional review process.2
CONCLUSION
The majority of deaths in neurocritical care units involve decisions to limit life-
sustaining therapy and pursue comfort care.7 While the steps outlined may seem
straightforward at face value, the frequency at which surrogate requests for poten-
tially inappropriate treatment occur is a key reason that critical care organizations
such as the American Thoracic Society and others have focused on standardizing
the professional approach to such situations. Whenever possible, ‘‘clinicians should
conceptualize their judgments that requested treatments are inappropriate as
preliminary claims in need of confirmation, rather than conclusions to be
immediately acted on.’’2 An early introduction of palliative care principles into the
care of hospitalized patients with severe stroke may help avoid such situations of
conflict between care teams and patient surrogates.8
The patient described in the case died of a cardiac arrest before a formal
hospital ethics committee consult was called. According to his wife’s wishes, he
underwent a brief resuscitation attempt before being declared dead, an out-
come that, in and of itself, many clinicians may question from an ethical
perspective. This case thus also highlights the practical challenges of balancing a
fair, protocolized process for conflict resolution with the reality of the critically
ill patient’s condition. Time windows for decision making in the neurocritical
care unit are often brief, and unpredictable factors may affect the extent to
which clinicians can participate in processes of external review regarding the
appropriateness of treatments. With this caveat in mind, clinicians faced with
treatment requests from patients’ families that are potentially inappropriate
should nonetheless strive to avoid unilateral decisions that may be susceptible
to bias and follow a stepwise transparent approach to ensure that multiple
viewpoints are considered whenever possible.
REFERENCES
1. Cai X, Robinson J, Muehlschlegel S, et al. Patient preferences and surrogate decision making in
neuroscience intensive care units. Neurocrit Care 2015;23(1):131Y141. doi:10.1007/s12028-015-0149-2.
2. Bosslet GT, Pope TM, Rubenfeld GD, et al. An official ATS/AACN/ACCP/ESICM/SCCM policy
statement: responding to requests for potentially inappropriate treatments in intensive care units.
Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2015;191(11):1318Y1330. doi:10.1164/rccm.201505-0924ST.
3. American Thoracic Society. Withholding and withdrawing life-sustaining therapy. Ann Intern Med
1991;115(6):478Y485. doi:10.7326/0003-4819-115-6-478.
4. Consensus statement of the Society of Critical Care Medicine’s Ethics Committee regarding futile
and other possibly inadvisable treatments. Crit Care Med 1997;25(5):887Y891.
5. George BP, Kelly AG, Schneider EB, Holloway RG. Current practices in feeding tube placement for US
acute ischemic stroke inpatients. Neurology 2014;83(10):874Y882. doi:10.1212/WNL.0000000000000764.
6. Hwang DY, Bernat JL. Neurologists and end-of-life decision-making: the role of ‘‘protective
paternalism.’’ Neurol Clin Pract 2015;5(1):6Y8. doi:10.1212/CPJ.0000000000000096.
7. Diringer MN, Edwards DF, Aiyagari V, Hollingsworth H. Factors associated with withdrawal of mechanical
ventilation in a neurology/neurosurgery intensive care unit. Crit Care Med 2001;29(9):1792Y1797.
8. Holloway RG, Arnold RM, Creutzfeldt CJ, et al. Palliative and end-of-life care in stroke: a
statement for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke
Association. Stroke 2014;45(6):1887Y1916. doi:10.1161/STR.0000000000000015.
Remote Evaluation of
Address correspondence to
Dr Bart M. Demaerschalk,
Mayo Clinic Hospital,
5777 E Mayo Blvd,
INTRODUCTION
Telestroke is an application of telemedicine that brings the expertise and ex-
perience of vascular neurologists and other stroke experts directly to hospitals that
are neurologically underserved. This article presents the rationale and evidence
supporting the use of telemedicine for the remote evaluation of patients with acute
stroke and discusses the practical aspects of a telemedicine evaluation.
Case
A 75-year-old woman living in a rural area was witnessed by her family to
have the sudden onset of dysarthria and left-sided weakness, which
persisted. She was transported by emergency medical services to her local
acute strokeYready community hospital within 60 minutes of the onset of
symptoms, where she was evaluated by an emergency department
physician. The hospital had a telestroke service agreement with a tertiary
care hospital; the emergency department physician initiated the system,
and a telestroke consultation was provided by a vascular neurologist at a
comprehensive stroke center hospital. A video-audio link was established
over the Internet, and a virtual face-to-face consult was performed by the
neurologist with the help of an emergency department nurse who assisted
in obtaining the history and performed the National Institutes of Health
Stroke Scale examination under the supervision of the neurologist.
Continued on page 260
DISCUSSION
Levine and Gorman first suggested the term telestroke in 1999 to describe the
use of telemedicine for patients with stroke.1 In the earliest experiences with IV
recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rtPA) treatment for acute ischemic
stroke, complication rates were highest among hospitals inexperienced with
stroke.2 Telemedicine for stroke was developed to assist as a neurologic con-
sultative modality for hospitals without neurologic expertise on-site.3 Studies
revealed that IV rtPA protocols were more rigorously applied, stroke mimics were
more accurately identified, brain scans were more regularly assessed in a timely
fashion, and thrombolysis rates in eligible patients were higher when telestroke
was adopted in stroke systems of care.4Y6 Telestroke is designed to provide any
patient who manifests symptoms and signs consistent with acute stroke access to
an expert and swift clinical evaluation, a review of diagnostic tests, a diagnosis,
emergency treatment recommendations, and disposition decision making. A
telestroke consultation is best performed in collaboration with bedside
physicians and nurses, regardless of hospital location, emergency department
versus other unit, rural or urban community, time of day, and proximity to the
nearest stroke center.7 Because IV rtPA and endovascular treatments each have
narrow time windows of effectiveness, stroke is a time-sensitive emergency. The
availability of a range of effective treatments, the paucity of stroke experts in
emergency departments, the opportunity to improve access and quality of care,
the narrow window of treatment efficacy, the resources required for air and ground
ambulance transportation, and the advancements in connected care technology
have all contributed to optimal conditions for telestroke.8
Telestroke Networks
Most telestroke networks are fashioned either as a distributed model or as a hub-
and-spoke model. In the typical distributive model, telestroke consultations are
delivered to hospitals from groups of providers who may be located at multiple
distant sites on a contractual basis. The providers typically have no other affiliation
with the telestroke hospital. If a patient requires a higher level of care following the
Metrics
Because of the critical importance of rapid treatment with IV rtPA of all eligible
patients with acute ischemic stroke, recording of time elements is key. Similar to
in-person acute stroke care, monitoring and recording critical time points in the
stroke chain of survival is compulsory (eg, patient arrival at originating site [spoke
site], time of CT, and start time of IV rtPA treatment) (Practice Table 2). Ad-
ditionally, the telestroke network should record the times of telestroke hotline
activation, telestroke team response by telephone, video start, diagnosis and
treatment decision making, and conclusion of the video consultation. Telestroke
networks generally record whether or not transfer from spoke to hub is indi-
cated, the nature of the indication, the transportation mode (air or ground), and
the name of the destination hospital.
Characteristics of the patient as well as characteristics of the telemedicine
encounter should be recorded, including age, gender, time variables, NIHSS score,
diagnosis, treatment decision making, disposition postemergency evaluation, and
transfer. Patient outcomes could include hospital length of stay, whether at hub or
at spoke, and in-hospital complications, including symptomatic and asymptomatic
intracerebral hemorrhage, extracranial hemorrhage, hemilingual edema, and
Quality Monitoring
Audio, video, and Internet connectivity technical observations, failures, and limit-
ations should be recorded, and a backup system should be available.28 Any security
breach or violation of protected health information policy should be investigated.
Monitoring of neurovascular image transmission and quality should be a part of
technology workflow. Telestroke network hub-and-spoke sites should measure
quality of clinical performance in a standardized manner.29 Practice Table 3 lists
suggested quality monitoring measures for telestroke.
CONCLUSION
Telestroke is a connected care approach to bringing expert stroke care to
remote, neurologically underserved urban or rural locations. Strong evidence
exists supporting the equivalence of telestroke to in-person care. Time is criti-
cal in treating patients with acute stroke, and telestroke networks must assure
that technology improvesVnot delaysVdelivery of care. The stroke center and
the spoke site must work collaboratively to develop and institute protocols
and policies to be sure that eligible patients are identified, assessed, and treated
swiftly. Adverse outcomes, such as intracranial hemorrhage and mortality, must be
b Timeliness Measures
Hub measures: response time, consult time, transfer time
Spoke measures: time from door to telestroke consult activation and initiation,
time from door to CT, time from door to CT interpretation, time from door to
laboratory tests drawn, time from door to preliminary diagnosis, time from
door to treatment decision making or time from door to downgrade, time from
door to consult completion, time from door to start of IV rtPA, time from door
to consult completion and transfer (if applicable)
b Organizational Measures
Baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score, rtPA protocol
adherence (3 and 4.5 hours), transfers for higher level of care (to hub, to other
primary stroke center, to other comprehensive stroke center, to other),
endovascular treatment, advanced neurovascular imaging (CT/CTA/CTP or
MRA/DWI/PWI/MRI) completion at spoke, patient and family satisfaction
b Technology Measures
Connectivity, quality of video, quality of audio, neuroimaging transmission
(teleradiology), time needed to make connection, resolution of technical issues,
equipment downtime, IT response time (spoke, hub, and vendor IT support),
percentage of consults with technical observations (or problems), percentage
of technical problems that delayed diagnosis and decision making, percentage
of technical problems that prevented diagnosis and decision making
b Patient Measures
Hospital admission, hospital length of stay, discharge disposition, 90-day
outcome, modified Rankin Scale score, National Institutes of Health Stroke
Scale score, Functional Independence Measure score, diagnostic accuracy,
stroke mimics, percentage of patients with acute stroke evaluated within
3 hours of stroke onset, percentage of patients with acute stroke evaluated
within 4.5 hours of stroke onset, percentage of all patients appropriate for
telestroke calls initiated, percentage of all eligible patients for IV rtPA treated,
safety, mortality, postYIV rtPA hemorrhage
CT = computed tomography; CTA = computed tomography angiography; CTP = computed
tomography perfusion; DWI = diffusion-weighted imaging; IT = information technology;
IV = intravenous; MRA = magnetic resonance angiography; MRI = magnetic resonance
imaging; PWI = perfusion-weighted imaging; rtPA = recombinant tissue plasminogen activator.
REFERENCES
1. Levine SR, Gorman M. ‘‘Telestroke’’: the application of telemedicine for stroke. Stroke
1999;30(2):464Y469. doi:10.1161/01.STR.30.2.464.
2. Heuschmann PU, Kolominsky-Rabas PL, Roether J, et al. Predictors of in-hospital mortality in
patients with acute ischemic stroke treated with thrombolytic therapy. JAMA
2004;292(15):1831Y1838. doi:10.1001/jama.292.15.1831.
3. Audebert H. Telestroke: effective networking. Lancet Neurol 2006;5(3):279Y282.
doi:10.1016/S1474-4422(06)70378-7.
4. Meyer BC, Raman R, Hemmen T, et al. Efficacy of site-independent telemedicine in the STRokE
DOC trial: a randomised, blinded, prospective study. Lancet Neurol 2008;7(9):787Y795.
doi:10.1016/S1474-4422(08)70171-6.
5. Audebert HJ, Kukla C, Clarmann von Claranau S, et al. Telemedicine for safe and extended use of
thrombolysis in stroke: the Telemedic Pilot Project for Integrative Stroke Care (TEMPiS) in
Bavaria. Stroke 2005;36(2):287Y291. doi:10.1161/01.STR.0000153015.57892.66.
6. Müller-Barna P, Hubert GJ, Boy S, et al. TeleStroke units serving as a model of care in rural areas:
10-year experience of the TeleMedical project for integrative stroke care. Stroke
2014;45(9):2739Y2744. doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.114.006141.
7. Higashida R, Alberts MJ, Alexander DN, et al. Interactions within stroke systems of care: a policy
statement from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke
2013;44(10):2961Y2984. doi:10.1161/STR.0b013e3182a6d2b2.
8. Hess DC, Audebert HJ. The history and future of telestroke. Nat Rev Neurol 2013;9(6):340Y350.
doi:10.1038/nrneurol.2013.86.
9. Schwamm LH, Audebert HJ, Amarenco P, et al. Recommendations for the implementation of
telemedicine within stroke systems of care: a policy statement from the American Heart
Association. Stroke 2009;40(7):2635Y2660. doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.109.192361.
10. Schwamm LH, Holloway RG, Amarenco P, et al. A review of the evidence for the use of
telemedicine within stroke systems of care: a scientific statement from the American Heart
Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke 2009;40(7):2616Y2634. doi:10.1161/
STROKEAHA.109.192360.
11. Jauch EC, Saver JL, Adams HP Jr, et al. Guidelines for the early management of patients with
acute ischemic stroke: a guideline for healthcare professionals from the American Heart
Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke 2013;44(3):870Y947. doi:10.1161/
STR.0b013e318284056a.
12. Wechsler LR, Demaerschalk BM, Schwamm LH, et al. Telemedicine quality and outcomes in
stroke: a scientific statement for healthcare professionals from the American Heart
Association/American Stroke Association [published online ahead of print November 3, 2016].
Stroke. doi:10.1161/STR.0000000000000114.
13. Demaerschalk BM, Kleindorfer DO, Adeoye OM, et al. Scientific rationale for the inclusion and
exclusion criteria for intravenous alteplase in acute ischemic stroke: a statement for healthcare
professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke
2016;47(2):581Y641. doi:10.1161/STR.0000000000000086.
14. Schwamm LH, Rosenthal ES, Hirshberg A, et al. Virtual TeleStroke support for the emergency
department evaluation of acute stroke. Acad Emerg Med 2004;11(11):1193Y1197.
doi:10.1197/j.aem.2004.08.014.
15. Grotta JC, Hacke W. Stroke neurologist’s perspective on the new endovascular trials. Stroke
2015;46(6):1447Y1452. doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.115.008384.
16. Pervez MA, Silva G, Masrur S, et al. Remote supervision of IV-tPA for acute ischemic stroke by
telemedicine or telephone before transfer to a regional stroke center is feasible and safe.
Stroke 2010;41(1):e18Ye24. doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.109.560169.
17. Müller R, Pfefferkorn T, Vatankhah B, et al. Admission facility is associated with outcome of
basilar artery occlusion. Stroke 2007;38(4):1380Y1383. doi:10.1161/01.STR.0000260089.17105.27.
18. Khan K, Shuaib A, Whittaker T, et al. Telestroke in Northern Alberta: A two year experience with
remote hospitals. Can J Neurol Sci 2010;37(6):808Y813.
19. Chalouhi N, Dressler JA, Kunkel ES, et al. Intravenous tissue plasminogen activator
administration in community hospitals facilitated by telestroke service. Neurosurgery
2013;73(4):667Y671; discussion 671Y672. doi:10.1227/NEU.0000000000000073.
20. Nelson RE, Okon N, Lesko AC, et al. The cost-effectiveness of telestroke in the Pacific Northwest
region of the USA. J Telemed Telecare. 2016;22(7):413Y421. doi:10.1177/1357633X15613920.
21. American Telemedicine Association State Policy Resource Center. State legislative & regulatory
trackers. americantelemed.org/policy/state-policy-resource-center. Accessed December 5, 2016.
22. Puetz V, Bodechtel U, Gerber JC, et al. Reliability of brain CT evaluation by stroke neurologists in
telemedicine. Neurology 2013;80(4):332Y338. doi:10.1212/WNL.0b013e31827f07d0.
Coding in
Address correspondence to
Dr Pearce J. Korb,
University of Colorado,
Leprino Building, 12401 E
INTRODUCTION
It is important to code accurately in the care of people with strokes and other
cerebrovascular diseases not only to ensure the financial health of the practice but
also to provide better patient care. The International Classification of Diseases,
Tenth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-10-CM) must be used for diagnosis-
or problem-based coding.1 In addition to the diagnosis codes, Current Pro-
cedural Terminology (CPT) provides codes for Evaluation and Management
(E/M) services as well as procedures.2 This article summarizes the relevant codes
in ICD-10-CM, CPT codes for common and special procedures, and the issues
associated with accurate documentation. A case vignette is included to illustrate
these principles.
DIAGNOSIS CODING STANDARDS
Since the article ‘‘Coding for Telestroke’’ by Timothy J. Ingall, MBBS, PhD, and Bart
M. Demaerschalk, MD, MSc FRCPC,3 in the 2014 Continuum Cerebrovascular
Disease issue, the new ICD-10-CM, the alphanumeric coding system for clinical
diagnoses, has gone live in the United States. It is far more granular than the
prior edition, the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clin-
ical Modification (ICD-9-CM), with an expansion of codes from approximately
14,000 to 69,000. The increased specificity of codes allows for improved disease
tracking. In addition to the more systemic public health rationale, ICD-10-CM
may play a role in more accurate representation of disease acuity or risk when
considering how value is going to play a larger part in reimbursement.4
In the transition from ICD-9-CM to ICD-10-CM, stroke and other cerebrovascular
diseaseYrelated codes became much more complex. With this new code structure,
over 400 different possible combinations exist for stroke. The first three characters
(A12.----) are common traits, and the following characters (up to four: ---.3456)
contribute increasing specificity (Coding Table 1). The cerebral infarction codes
are within the common group Diseases of the Circulatory System denoted with
the letter I (I00YI99). More specifically, cerebrovascular diseases are included in
I60YI69, which includes I63, Cerebral infarction, the main focus of this article, and
codes for hemorrhagic strokes and other forms of intracranial bleeding.
Cerebral infarction can be further codified in an increasingly specific manner.
After I63, the decimal is placed and the following characters have specific clinical
meaning. The fourth digit denotes mechanism (eg, embolism, thrombosis) and
whether the arterial source is precerebral (extracranial) or cerebral (intracranial).
Once this is established, the fifth character identifies a specific artery, if known.
The sixth digit can specify laterality, if known or applicable to the localization
(Coding Table 2).
The codes listed in Coding Table 2 are the most common for ischemic
stroke, but less common causes of stroke and conditions are coded separately.
Several conditions within other code categories, such as I67, Other cerebro-
vascular diseases, and I68, Cerebrovascular disorders in diseases classified else-
where, cover strokes from other mechanisms or from other causes.
In addition, I65, Occlusion and stenosis of precerebral arteries, not resulting in
cerebral infarction, is a set of analogous codes with parallel specificity (eg, artery,
side). These codes are useful in encounters of transient ischemic attack (TIA) when
the vascular pathology is known. Importantly, TIAs and related conditions are
listed with Diseases of the Nervous System (G00YG99) instead of with Diseases of
the Circulatory System (Coding Table 3). In most cases, when the pathology is
known, G45, Transient cerebral ischemic attacks and related syndromes, would
be coded separately as a manifestation code secondary to the main code (eg, a TIA
due to stenosis of the basilar artery would be coded I65.1, Occlusion and stenosis
of basilar artery, with G45.0, Vertebro-basilar artery syndrome). If the pathology is
not known at the time, then G45.9, Transient cerebral ischemic attack, unspecified,
could be used as a primary code.
Unlike ICD-9-CM, ICD-10-CM no longer includes a time frame for what qual-
ifies for a condition to be considered a late effect from a stroke. If specifically
managing effects of a prior stroke, use I69, Sequelae of cerebrovascular disease
codes, but note that a new stroke code cannot be used concurrently (eg, I63,
Term Code
Cerebral infarction I63
Precerebral arteries
Cerebral infarction due to thrombosis of precerebral arteries I63.0
Cerebral infarction due to embolism of precerebral arterials I63.1
Cerebral infarction due to unspecified occlusion or stenosis of I63.2
precerebral arteries
Specific arteries for I63.0YI63.2 must be identified with a fifth character
Unspecified precerebral artery I63.-0
Vertebral artery I63.-1
Basilar artery I63.-2
Carotid artery I63.-3
Other precerebral artery I63.-9
Cerebral arteries
Cerebral infarction due to thrombosis of cerebral arteries I63.3
Cerebral infarction due to embolism of cerebral arteries I63.4
Cerebral infarction due to unspecified occlusion or stenosis of I63.5
cerebral arteries
Specific arteries for I63.3YI63.5 must be identified with a fifth character
Unspecified cerebral artery I63.-0
Middle cerebral artery I63.-1
Anterior cerebral artery I63.-2
Posterior cerebral artery I63.-3
Cerebellar artery I63.-4
Other cerebral artery I63.-9
Laterality, when applicable, for I63.0YI63.5 must be identified
with a sixth character
Right I63.--1
Left I63.--2
Unspecified I63.--9
Other or unspecified vascular source
Cerebral infarction due to cerebral venous thrombosis, nonpyogenic I63.6
Other cerebral infarction I63.8
Cerebral infarction, unspecified I63.9
ICD-10-CM = International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, Clinical Modification.
Term Code
Other cerebrovascular diseases I67
Dissection of cerebral arteries, nonruptured I67.0
Cerebral aneurysm, nonruptured I67.1
Cerebral atherosclerosis I67.2
Progressive vascular leukoencephalopathy I67.3
Hypertensive encephalopathy I67.4
Moyamoya disease I67.5
Nonpyogenic thrombosis of intracranial venous system I67.6
Cerebral arteritis, not elsewhere classified I67.7
Other specified cerebrovascular diseases I67.8
Cerebrovascular disorders in diseases classified elsewhere I68
Cerebral amyloid angiopathy I68.0
Cerebral arteritis in other diseases classified elsewhere I68.2
Other cerebrovascular disorders in diseases classified elsewhere I68.8
Transient cerebral ischemic attacks and related syndromes G45
Vertebro-basilar artery syndrome G45.0
Carotid artery syndrome (hemispheric) G45.1
Multiple and bilateral precerebral artery syndromes G45.2
Amaurosis fugax G45.3
Transient global amnesia G45.4
Other transient cerebral ischemic attacks and related syndromes G45.8
Transient cerebral ischemic attack, unspecified G45.9
ICD-10-CM = International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, Clinical Modification.
Term Code
Sequelae of cerebral infarction I69.3
Unspecified sequelae of cerebral infarction I69.30
Cognitive deficits following cerebral infarction I69.31
Speech and language deficits following cerebral infarction I69.32
Aphasia following cerebral infarction I69.320
Dysphasia following cerebral infarction I69.321
Dysarthria following cerebral infarction I69.322
Fluency disorder following cerebral infarction I69.323
Other speech and language deficits following cerebral infarction I69.328
Monoplegia of upper limb following cerebral infarction I69.33
Monoplegia of lower limb following cerebral infarction I69.34
Hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction I69.35
Other paralytic syndrome following cerebral infarction I69.36
Laterality and dominance for I69.33YI69.36 must be identified
with sixth character
Right dominant side I69.3-1
Left dominant side I69.3-2
Right non-dominant side I69.3-3
Left non-dominant side I69.3-4
Unspecified side I69.3-9
Other sequelae of cerebral infarction I69.39
Apraxia following cerebral infarction I69.390
Dysphagia following cerebral infarction I69.391
Facial weakness following cerebral infarction I69.392
Ataxia following cerebral infarction I69.393
Other sequelae of cerebral infarction I69.398
Personal history of transient ischemic attack (TIA), and cerebral Z86.73
infarction without residual deficits
ICD-10-CM = International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, Clinical Modification.
the manifestation/sequelae codes, risk factor codes, and any related clinical
syndromes (listed under G46, Vascular syndromes of brain in cerebrovas-
cular diseases) to the primary codes of cerebral pathology (eg, I63, Cerebral
infarction), besides the clinical value of increased specificity, may influence the
Hierarchical Condition Categories risk adjustment and reimbursement in the
near future.
Term Code
Use additional codes to identify presence of:
Alcohol related disorders F10
Nicotine dependence F17
Hypertension I10YI15
Occupational exposure to environmental tobacco smoke Z57.31
Tobacco use Z72.0
Contact with and (suspected) exposure to environmental tobacco Z77.22
smoke (acute) (chronic)
Personal history of nicotine dependence Z87.891
Status post administration of tPA (rtPA) in a different facility within Z92.82
the last 24 hours prior to admission to current facility
ICD-10-CM = International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, Clinical Modification.
Inpatient Coding
Stroke is one of the most common neurologic diagnoses warranting inpatient
admission; therefore, much of the care of these patients occurs in the inpatient
setting.5 The majority of a stroke provider’s services fall under E/M in CPT. The
fundamentals and elements of E/M coding have been covered extensively else-
where.2,3,6,7 One should be familiar with the specific differences in documentation
requirements based on the location and context of the encounter (eg, inpatient versus
outpatient/emergency department, new patient versus established patient visit).
One of the three major elements of E/M is medical decision making, which is
further divided into three areas: the number of conditions being addressed and
their status, the amount and intensity of data reviewed or ordered, and risk. Risk
may be the area most specifically important for those caring for patients with
stroke. This is determined by a table of risk and is labeled minimal, low, moderate,
or high. The level of risk is determined by three elements: presenting problems,
diagnostic procedures, and management options selected. It should be noted that
any abrupt change in neurologic status is one of the elements in presenting
problems for high level of risk. This would be applicable to the first encounter in
acute stroke. Drug therapy requiring intensive monitoring for toxicity is another
element considered to qualify for high level of risk. The use of and monitoring of
rtPA could be considered high risk, although as discussed later in this article, the
acute use of the medication can be considered critical care and coded in a different
way. Subsequent encounters during the admission may not qualify for high risk;
the provider must use this table in addition to the other elements of medical
decision making to determine risk (Coding Table 6).
If the patient is unstable and critically ill, critical care CPT codes can be used
instead of or in addition to E/M codes. Several situations exist in which this could
be true in the care of patients with acute stroke. Use of IV rtPA and certainly use of
intraarterial rtPA and possible mechanical thrombectomy qualifies for this high
probability of life-threatening deterioration. In addition to documenting this risk,
critical care coding requires detailed documentation of the time spent on care. The
code for the first hour of the time spent is 99291, Critical care, evaluation and
management; for each additional half hour, 99292, each additional 30 minutes
should be used (multiple times as applicable to the total time spent). The patient
does not have to be in a critical care unit. The codes can be applied if the clini-
cal work and patient are in any setting as long as the time spent is with the
patient or immediately available at bedside (eg, physician and patient in the
emergency department during rtPA and other acute care).8 If the patient is being
comanaged by different specialists responsible for different aspects of care,
then all can bill for critical time, but all must be considered primary providers of
care (as opposed to consultants), and any time spent by a trainee does not count
toward the total time.6
The case example in this article illustrates the critical nature of the care of
patients with stroke and the complexity of coding. In this scenario, the provider
determined and documented the critical and unstable nature of the patient
having received a therapy with a high rate of complication. Assuming complete
documentation of the critical status of the patient, time spent with the patient or
immediately available, and a description of the work done in that time, the
provider could code for critical care time. The appropriate coding for this case as
presented is summarized in Coding Table 7, Scenario 1.
Case
A 62-year-old right-handed man with a history of essential hypertension and
tobacco use presented with the sudden onset of aphasia and severe right
hemiplegia within 2 hours of onset, concerning for ischemic stroke. He underwent
a stroke code in the emergency department. His National Institutes of Health
Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score was 13, and his blood pressure was 162/95 mm Hg.
He had no contraindications to thrombolytic therapy. He had a family history of
myocardial infarction. His wife was present and was able to give urgent but
informed consent. She provided a complete medical history, social history, and
review of systems for the previous 2 weeks. His head CT was negative for bleeding
and was both independently reviewed and discussed with the on-call radiologist.
A head CT angiogram was also performed, and an occlusion of the left middle
cerebral artery was found. IV recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rtPA)
was given at 2.5 hours after the last time the patient was known to be at his
neurologic baseline. After the infusion, a complete screening neurologic
examination beyond the NIHSS score was conducted. The patient was admitted
to the medical intensive care unit for close medical and neurologic observation,
with a neurologist as the primary provider in the open unit but a medical
intensive care unit physician and team managing any other medical issues.
All of these issues were documented, including the risk for deterioration from
potential hemorrhagic complications of the rtPA. The time spent with the patient
or immediately available to the bedside in the emergency department prior to
transfer was also documented, which totaled 120 minutes.
Outpatient Coding
The principles of coding E/M for outpatient encounters are the same as for
inpatient encounters. The issues of coding in the prevention of stroke have
been covered in a previous Continuum article,7 with appropriate emphasis put
on diagnostic specificity, inclusion of code for the effects of stroke being managed
(Coding Table 4), and the importance of documentation of time spent on
Primary
Cerebral infarction due to unspecified occlusion I63.512 Be as specific as possible. Note
or stenosis of left middle cerebral artery mechanism is unknown at this time.
Risk factors
Essential (primary) hypertension I10
Tobacco use Z72.0
Aphasia R47.01
Hemiplegia, unspecified affecting right G81.91
dominant side
Procedures CPT
Scenario 1
E/M
Critical care, evaluation and management of 99291 First 74 of 120 total minutes
the critically ill or critically injured patient; documented are used on this code.
first 30-74 minutes
Critical care, evaluation and management 99292 x 1 Next 30 minutes are used on this code,
of the critically ill or critically injured patient; leaving 16 minutes. If at least 30 additional
each additional 30 minutes (List separately minutes had been documented, then
in addition to code for primary service) additional 99292 codes should be submitted.
Continued on page e10
counseling on risk factor prevention. This is all still true; the only change is the
increased specificity of ICD-10-CM, as previously discussed.
Telestroke
Parity between payment of in-person care and telehealth from third-party payers
is now required by law in 29 states and the District of Columbia. The statues
vary from state to state in regard to the licensing requirements, types of
services, and technologic restrictions.9 Despite the variable adoption of tele-
medicine, it is gaining acceptance and becoming eligible for reimbursement.
CONCLUSION
Caring for patients with strokes and cerebrovascular disease is complex, espe-
cially in the acute setting. The diagnostic coding system reflects this specificity;
accuracy is increasingly important as level of risk will be increasingly used in
reimbursement models. The stability of the patient, level of care delivered, and
setting of the care (eg, telehealth) determine the unique coding standards and
should be understood to ensure compliance.
The Continuum Postreading Self-Assessment and CME Test is an integral part of the issue that is intended to
stimulate thought and help participants assess general understanding of the material presented in this issue.
The Postreading Self-Assessment and CME Test is also approved by the American Board of Psychiatry and
Neurology (ABPN) to meet the Lifelong Learning (CME), Self-Assessment (SA) (part 2) component for
Maintenance of Certification.
For each item, select the single best response. A tally sheet is provided with this issue to allow the option of
marking answers before entering them online at aan.com/continuum/cme. A faxable scorecard is available
only upon request to subscribers who do not have computer access or to nonsubscribers who have
purchased single back issues (send an email to [email protected]).
Upon completion of the Postreading Self-Assessment and CME Test and issue evaluation online, participants
may earn up to 12 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditsTM toward SA-CME. Participants have up to 3 years from the
date of publication to earn CME credits. No SA-CME will be awarded for this issue after February 29, 2020.
b 1. Which of the following causes of pediatric stroke is associated with the highest risk of recurrence?
A. cervical artery dissection
B. migraine
C. moyamoya disease
D. postinfectious vasculopathy
E. reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome
b 2. A 34-year-old woman is seen in consultation after developing a right subcortical hemorrhage during labor. Her
neurologic history is notable for a prior left subcortical hemorrhage at age 18 that was attributed to mild head trauma. She
was not hypertensive during her pregnancy. Her examination shows a mild left hemiparesis and is otherwise normal;
blood pressure is 113/70 mm Hg. MRI of her brain shows a small acute hemorrhage in the right basal ganglia, diffuse white
matter hyperintensities through both cerebral hemispheres, a small chronic hemorrhage in the left putamen and several
subcortical microhemorrhages. Which of the following is the most likely diagnosis?
A. chronic untreated hypertension
B. COL4A1 mutation
C. inflammatory cerebral amyloid angiopathy
D. preeclampsia
E. reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome
b 3. Which of the following categories of patients with stroke should have a standard swallow screen before they are
allowed to eat after a stroke?
A. all patients
B . only patients who are older than 65 years
C. only patients who have had a brainstem stroke
D. only patients who have had a large dominant hemisphere stroke
E . only patients with reduced levels of consciousness
b 4. An 81-year-old man is seen in the emergency department after an episode of expressive aphasia and right facial
weakness lasting 15 minutes. His electrocardiogram shows atrial fibrillation, which has not been documented in
the past. Which of the following characteristics, if present, would make the use of a novel oral anticoagulant
challenging in this patient?
A. age 80 or older
B. body mass index of 35 or more
C. history of poor medication adherence
D. use of a cane as an assistive device
E. vegetarian diet
b 5. When using antihypertensive medication for secondary stroke prevention, which of the following medication
effects should be avoided because it is associated with an increased risk of stroke?
A. high blood pressure variability
B. low pulse pressure
C. low systolic blood pressure
D. rapid heart rate
E. short QT interval
b 6. A 33-year-old man is seen in clinic for evaluation of a recent cerebellar stroke. His stroke workup is most notable
for a dilated and tortuous appearance of his vertebral and basilar arteries seen on magnetic resonance angiography
(MRA). He has three siblings, including one brother who had a reportedly cryptogenic cerebellar stroke in his
20s. His two sisters are well. Which of the following would be most likely to be found in this patient?
A. café au lait spots
B. early alopecia
C. hemiplegic migraines
D. painful small fiber neuropathy
E. tall stature with long extremities
b 7. A 67-year-old woman is seen in the emergency department for evaluation of language dysfunction. She was
reportedly in her normal state of health when she and her son had dinner at 7 PM the night before. He went out
afterward and found her sleeping in a recliner when he returned at 10 PM, and he thinks he heard her go to the
bathroom around 2 AM (although he did not speak with her at those times). She usually awakens around 6 AM, and
he found her with nonsensical speech at 8 AM. Her examination is notable for receptive language dysfunction
(National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score of 5) but no other focal neurologic deficits. Which of the following
times should she be considered to have last been well?
A. 7 PM yesterday
B. 10 PM yesterday
C. 2 AM today
D. 6 AM today
E. 8 AM today
b 9. In patients with 70% stenosis of the extracranial portion of an internal carotid artery who have no history of
ischemic symptoms, which of the following tests is most reliable for identifying patients who have a higher risk of
future stroke?
A. EEG
B. functional MRI (fMRI)
C. magnetoencephalogram (MEG)
D. somatosensory evoked responses
E. transcranial Doppler
b 10. A 68-year-old man is seen in the emergency department with the acute onset of left-sided weakness and left
hemineglect beginning 1 hour ago. His blood pressure is 154/90 mm Hg; his vital signs are otherwise unremarkable.
His National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score is 9. Which of the following medications, if taken earlier that
morning, would represent an exclusion to IV thrombolysis?
A. aspirin
B. clopidogrel
C. dabigatran
D. lisinopril
E. warfarin (with international normalized ratio [INR] of 1.6)
b 11. Which of the following best describes the relationship between the size of an unruptured aneurysm and
the risk of rupture?
A. consistently negative slope: the larger the aneurysm, the lower the risk
B . consistently positive slope: the larger the aneurysm, the greater the risk
C. inverted U-shaped curve: the risk is greatest with midsized aneurysms and lower with very small or
very large aneurysms
D. no relationship
E . U-shaped curve: the risk is lowest with midsized aneurysms and greater with very small or very
large aneurysms
b 12. Which of the following clinical factors is associated with lower total IQ following pediatric stroke?
A. congenital heart disease as a cause of stroke
B. development of poststroke epilepsy
C. earlier age of stroke
D. presence of motor findings
E. subcortical location of stroke
b 13. A 5-year-old boy is admitted to the hospital with a 2-day history of left-sided weakness and numbness. Brain
imaging shows an acute stroke in the right hemisphere and subcortical white matter. Which of the following
mechanisms is the most common cause of stroke in children this age?
A. acquired heart disease
B. definite or suspected arteriopathy
C. hypercoagulable state
D. infection/sepsis
E. small vessel disease due to type 1 diabetes mellitus
b 14. Based on the best clinical evidence to date, which of the following medications is associated with enhanced
motor recovery when started 5 to 10 days after stroke in patients with hemiparesis or hemiplegia?
A. carbidopa/levodopa
B. donepezil
C. fluoxetine
D. methylphenidate
E. modafinil
b 15. A 75-year-old man is seen in the emergency department with the acute onset of aphasia and right-sided
weakness starting 1 hour ago. His blood pressure is 150/73 mm Hg, and his pulse is 90 beats/min and irregularly
irregular. His National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score is 19, with points for left gaze preference, right-sided
weakness, right-sided sensory dysfunction, and global aphasia. Head CT shows a hyperdense left middle cerebral
artery sign. Which of the following is the most appropriate next step in management?
A. decompressive hemicraniectomy
B. IV heparin infusion
C. IV recombinant tissue plasminogen activator alone
D. IV recombinant tissue plasminogen activator and consideration of mechanical clot retrieval
E. referral for mechanical clot retrieval
b 16. In a patient with short-lived neurologic symptoms, presence of which of the following symptoms is associated
with the highest risk of development of subsequent stroke?
A. aphasia
B. dizziness
C. generalized weakness
D. left arm numbness
E. loss of consciousness
b 17. Which of the following is a contraindication to starting intermittent pneumatic compression for deep venous
thrombosis prophylaxis in a 72-year-old man hospitalized for a right frontoparietal stroke with a history of an
upper gastrointestinal bleed 3 weeks ago?
A. endovascular stent retrieval less than 12 hours ago
B. onset of stroke symptoms less than 24 hours ago
C. peripheral polyneuropathy
D. severe hemineglect and anosognosia
E. severe lower extremity edema
b 19. Which of the following valve types and locations is thought to confer the highest thromboembolic risk and, as a
result, is generally treated with warfarin at a higher goal international normalized ratio (INR)?
A. bioprosthetic aortic valve
B . bioprosthetic mitral valve
C. bioprosthetic tricuspid valve
D. mechanical aortic valve
E . mechanical mitral valve
b 20. An 84-year-old right-handed woman is seen in the emergency department for the acute onset of visual dysfunction,
noted upon awakening this morning. She went to bed in good health, but when she awoke, she found herself bumping
into things on her right side while walking. She also had profound difficulty reading the newspaper this morning.
On examination, she has fluent language and preserved ability to write but is unable to read and has slight trouble with
naming. She also has a right homonymous hemianopia. In addition to the left occipital lobe, which of the following
structures is most likely affected in this patient?
A. Broca area
B. left hippocampus
C. pulvinar of the left thalamus
D. right occipital lobe
E. splenium of the corpus callosum
b 21. In which of the following settings is the risk-benefit tradeoff between carotid endarterectomy and purely
medical management most balanced and therefore most likely to be swayed by the patient’s overall surgical risk?
A. asymptomatic 40% stenosis of proximal left internal carotid artery
B. asymptomatic 100% stenosis of proximal right internal carotid artery
C. symptomatic 40% stenosis of proximal left internal carotid artery
D. symptomatic 60% stenosis of proximal right internal carotid artery
E. symptomatic 90% stenosis of proximal left internal carotid artery
b 22. A 7-year-old boy is admitted to the hospital with a 1-day history of facial weakness and slurred speech. His
examination reveals weakness of the left lower face with mild associated dysarthria, as well as slowed finger taps of
the left hand and a slight left pronator drift. MRI of the brain shows an acute stroke in the right hemisphere;
magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) of the head and neck is unremarkable. Which of the following is the most
appropriate next diagnostic step?
A. blood work for fasting lipids
B. carotid ultrasound
C. catheter angiography
D. implantable cardiac monitor
E. transthoracic echocardiogram
b 23. Which of the following is the most common cause of elevated body temperature in the first 48 hours after an
ischemic stroke?
A. anhydrosis
B. damage to the hypothalamic thermoregulatory center
C. drug reaction
D. intraventricular blood due to hemorrhagic conversion
E. pneumonia
b 24. Endovascular flow diversion is US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved for treating aneurysms in
which of the following arterial sites?
A. anterior communicating artery
B. intracavernous carotid artery
C. M2 segment of the middle cerebral artery
D. posterior communicating artery
E. top of the basilar artery
b 25. A 64-year-old woman with hypertension and hyperlipidemia had a 5-minute episode of left hemiparesis that
resolved completely before she reached the emergency department. In the emergency department 8 hours after the
episode, her neurologic examination is normal. Which of the following is the most important reason to perform a brain
imaging study on this patient?
A. determine the size of the lesion
B. differentiate between transient ischemic attack and stroke
C. look for nonischemic causes of her symptoms
D. reassure her that her symptoms are being taken seriously
E. satisfy requirements for billing at a high level of complexity
b 26. A patient with which of the following features of cavernous malformation has the greatest risk
of future hemorrhage?
A. brainstem cavernous malformation discovered during evaluation for headache
B. brainstem cavernous malformation presenting with acute hemorrhage
C. occipital lobe cavernous malformation presenting with visual field defect
D. temporal lobe cavernous malformation presenting with acute hemorrhage
E. temporal lobe cavernous malformation presenting with seizures
b 27. A 64-year-old man is seen in the emergency department with left-sided weakness that started roughly 24 hours
ago. On examination, he has 2/5 power in the left leg, a very subtle pronator drift of the left arm, and no weakness of the
left face. Which of the following associated features is most likely to be found in this patient?
A. abulia
B. alexia without agraphia
C. dyscalculia
D. extinction to double simultaneous stimulation on the left
E. right gaze preference
b 29. A 33-year-old woman, currently at 36 weeks’ gestation, presents to the emergency department with acute-onset
left-sided weakness that began 90 minutes ago. She has weakness of the left face and arm, sensory loss in the left arm,
and mild dysarthria; her National Institutes of Health stroke scale score is 6. Blood pressure is 110/67 mm Hg. CT of
her brain is negative for hemorrhage but does show a possible hyperdense vessel sign in an M3 branch of the right
middle cerebral artery. Which of the following is the best next step in management?
A. induction of labor
B. IV recombinant tissue plasminogen activator
C. IV magnesium
D. referral for mechanical embolectomy
E. subcutaneous enoxaparin
b 30. A 33-year-old woman is seen in clinic for management of a recent right occipital stroke. Her diagnostic workup is
notable only for a transesophageal echocardiogram showing a small patent foramen ovale. No evidence of lower
extremity venous thrombosis is found, and testing for hypercoagulable states is negative. Which of the following is the
most appropriate next step for secondary stroke prevention in this patient?
A. aspirin
B. percutaneous patent foramen ovale closure
C. placement of an inferior vena cava filter
D. rivaroxaban
E. warfarin
b 31. A 65-year-old man is admitted to the hospital with a right internal capsule stroke resulting in a left hemiparesis. At
the end of the second hospital day, he has regained some limited movement in the left leg but does not have any
movement in the right arm or hand. Based on the Early Prediction of Functional Outcome After Stroke study (EPOS),
what is the likelihood of him recovering to a good functional outcome?
A. 10%
B. 25%
C. 40%
D. 50%
E. 75%
b 32. A 56-year-old man is seen in the emergency department with the acute onset of vertigo beginning 6 hours ago.
He reports a nearly constant sensation of movement associated with significant nausea and vomiting. His motor,
sensory, and cerebellar examinations are all normal; he is not able to stand during gait testing. Which of the following
additional findings on history or examination would be most supportive of a stroke or other central cause of
his symptoms?
A. lack of skew deviation
B. normal head impulse test
C. presence of tinnitus
D. unidirectional nystagmus
E. worsening of vertigo with positional changes
b 33. Melodic intonation therapy is a rehabilitation strategy thought to have potential benefit in the recovery from
which of the following poststroke deficits?
A. dysprosody
B. expressive aphasia
C. flaccid dysarthria
D. receptive aphasia
E. spastic dysarthria
b 34. For which of the following dietary interventions is there evidence from a controlled trial to indicate a
reduction in stroke risk?
A. Atkins diet
B. elimination of coffee
C. elimination of soda
D. Mediterranean diet
E. moderate (5 ounces a day) wine consumption
b 35. Which of the following treatments is most appropriate for treating symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage
that develops within 24 hours of receiving IV recombinant tissue plasminogen activator?
A. cryoprecipitate
B. dexamethasone
C. hypertonic saline
D. mannitol
E. pentoxifylline
b 36. Which patients with symptomatic 80% stenosis of the M1 segment of the left middle cerebral artery should be
treated with angioplasty and stenting together with aggressive medical management rather than aggressive medical
management alone?
A. all
B. none
C. those who have had more than five transient ischemic attacks or minor strokes
D. those whose ischemic symptoms lasted longer than 30 minutes
E. those with low-density lipoprotein higher than 100 mg/dL
b 38. A 41-year-old man with a history of IV drug use is admitted to the hospital with fever and left-sided weakness.
Brain imaging shows multiple small bihemispheric acute infarcts, more so in the right hemisphere. His blood
cultures are positive for Enterococcus, and his transesophageal echocardiogram shows a vegetation adherent to
the aortic valve. Which of the following is the most appropriate antithrombotic therapy in this patient?
A. IV heparin
B. no antithrombotic therapy
C. oral aspirin
D. oral aspirin and clopidogrel
E. subcutaneous enoxaparin
b 39. A 47-year-old woman is seen in clinic for evaluation of multiple lacunar strokes and abnormal brain imaging.
She has experienced three separate subcortical strokes over the past 5 years, despite no known stroke risk factors
and good adherence to healthy lifestyle habits. Her personal medical history is notable for migraine with aura
dating back to adolescence; family history is remarkable for severe migraines in her sister and early strokes and
cognitive impairment in her mother. Brain MRI in this patient is most likely to show which of the following?
A. abnormal lenticulostriate vessels in the basal ganglia
B. diffuse subcortical T2 hyperintensity, including the anterior temporal lobes
C. dolichoectasia of the posterior circulation
D. loss of flow voids in the distal internal carotid arteries
E. superficial siderosis over both cerebral hemispheres
b 40. Which of the following features would be the most compelling reason to recommend treatment to a patient
with an unruptured posterior communicating artery aneurysm?
A. age younger than 50 years
B. history of diabetes mellitus
C. history of migraine with aura
D. presence of an isolated third nerve palsy
E. presence of a 2-mm unruptured internal carotid artery aneurysm
Following are the preferred responses to the questions in the Postreading Self-Assessment and CME Test in this
Continuum issue. The preferred response is followed by an explanation and a reference with which you may seek
more specific information. You are encouraged to review the responses and explanations carefully to evaluate your
general understanding of the course material. The comments and references included with each question are
intended to encourage independent study.
Upon completion of the Postreading Self-Assessment and CME Test and issue evaluation online at aan.com/
continuum/cme, participants may earn up to 12 AMA PRA Category 1 Creditsi toward SA-CME. Participants have
up to 3 years from the date of publication to earn CME credits. No SA-CME will be awarded for this issue after
February 29, 2020.
b 1. The preferred response is C (moyamoya disease). Arteriopathy is a common cause of pediatric stroke. Several
different causative mechanisms can result in arteriopathy, but nonatherosclerotic forms of arteriopathy, such as
moyamoya disease, pose a higher risk of recurrent strokes than other causes such as cervical artery dissection,
transient arteriopathy, and postinfectious processes. For more information, refer to page 163 of the Continuum article
‘‘Arterial Ischemic Stroke in Children and Young Adults.’’
b 2. The preferred response is B (COL4A1 mutation). This patient is presenting with a subcortical hemorrhage of
unclear mechanism, likely provoked by the stress of childbirth. Her past history is notable for another brain
hemorrhage triggered by relatively mild head trauma. This history of multiple subcortical microhemorrhages
caused by mild trauma, in addition to the white matter disease without clear vascular risk factors, is suggestive of a
COL41A mutation. Preeclampsia and chronic hypertension both seem less likely in this case, given the lack of any
history of hypertension, either during or prior to her pregnancy. Reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome
can be associated with intracerebral hemorrhage but would not be expected to cause the white matter changes
described here. Amyloid angiopathy is unlikely in a patient of this age. For more information, refer to page 221 of
the Continuum article ‘‘Inherited and Uncommon Causes of Stroke.’’
b 3. The preferred response is A (all patients). Every patient who has had a stroke should have a swallow evaluation before
being allowed to eat, drink, or take oral medications. A prospective trial demonstrated that use of a standard swallow
screen protocol was associated with a significantly reduced risk of aspiration pneumonia. For more information,
refer to pages 100Y101 of the Continuum article ‘‘Prevention and Management of Poststroke Complications.’’
b 4. The preferred response is C (history of poor medication adherence). This patient is presenting with a left
hemispheric transient ischemic attack, which is most likely cardioembolic in nature in the setting of his newly
discovered atrial fibrillation. He would benefit from anticoagulation for secondary stroke prevention, and his
options include warfarin or a novel oral anticoagulant. Given their relatively short half-lives and the lack of a widely
available means to measure their effect, novel oral anticoagulants may not be the best choice for anticoagulation
in patients with medication nonadherence. Age, obesity, and the use of a cane would not pose clear
contraindications to use of a novel oral anticoagulant (or warfarin). A vegetarian lifestyle might pose a challenge to the
use of warfarin, given the high intake of vitamin K, but no dietary restrictions have been identified for patients using
novel agents. For more information, refer to pages 118 and 120 of the Continuum article ‘‘Cardioembolic Stroke.’’
b 5. The preferred response is A (high blood pressure variability). In the course of lowering overall blood pressure
for secondary stroke prevention, variability in blood pressure should be avoided. Atenolol is a medication that
appears to be associated with high blood pressure variability. For more information, refer to page 19 of the
Continuum article ‘‘Stroke Epidemiology and Risk Factor Management.’’
b 7. The preferred response is A (7 PM yesterday). This patient is presenting with an acute stroke manifesting with
receptive language dysfunction. Since her only neurologic deficits are in the language domain, her last known well
time should be considered to be the last time she communicated normally with someone. As a result, 7 PM yesterday
(when she had dinner with her son) should be considered as the last known well time; based on her current
examination, she would have been physically able to get up and around at 10 PM, 2 AM, and 6 AM. The time of symptom
discovery is 8 AM, but that should not be considered as the time of symptom onset. For more information, refer
to page 42 of the Continuum article ‘‘Clinical Evaluation of the Patient With Acute Stroke.’’
b 8. The preferred response is D (refer for formal driving evaluation). This patient has had a fair recovery from his
stroke but still has some lingering deficits that might impact his ability to operate a motor vehicle. This is also
occurring in the context of some baseline concerns about his ability to drive at a high level. In situations where the
safety of a return to driving is unclear, a formal driving assessment can be of assistance. Without a clear history of
episodes resembling seizures, there does not appear to be a clear role for an EEG or withholding his driving for an
arbitrary period of time, such as 1 year. Formal visual field testing may be beneficial, but the likelihood that a small defect
that was not detected on bedside testing would significantly impact his driving is probably low. If the baseline driving
concerns or any other symptoms were felt to be related to memory dysfunction, donepezil could be considered, but
it should not be prescribed solely to allow the patient to resume driving. For more information, refer to pages 249Y250
of the Continuum article ‘‘Stroke Rehabilitation.’’
b 9. The preferred response is E (transcranial Doppler). Transcranial Doppler embolus detection is probably the
best validated method for identifying patients with asymptomatic carotid stenosis who have an increased risk of
future ischemic events. For more information, refer to page 141 of the Continuum article ‘‘Large Artery
Atherosclerotic Occlusive Disease.’’
b 10. The preferred response is C (dabigatran). The novel oral anticoagulant medications (dabigatran, rivaroxaban,
apixaban, and edoxaban) are commonly used for stroke prevention in the setting of atrial fibrillation as well as
in other clinical scenarios. Since no method to measure the anticoagulant effect of these medications in a timely
fashion is available, thrombolytic therapy is usually withheld for patients who have taken a dose of these medications
within the past 48 hours. Patients taking warfarin can be treated within 3 hours of symptom onset if the international
normalized ratio (INR) is 1.7 or less. Aspirin, clopidogrel, and other antiplatelet medications do not represent a
contraindication to IV thrombolysis. Although angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (such as lisinopril) are
associated with a higher risk of thrombolysis-related angioedema, recombinant tissue plasminogen activator is
typically not withheld in that setting. For more information, refer to page 75 of the Continuum article
‘‘Treatment of Acute Ischemic Stroke.’’
b 11. The preferred response is B (consistently positive slope: the larger the aneurysm, the greater the risk).
The strongest predictors of rupture of an unruptured aneurysm are size (the larger the aneurysm, the greater
the risk), location (greatest risk with aneurysms in the posterior circulation or posterior communicating artery),
and symptoms not due to rupture. For more information, refer to pages 185Y186 of the Continuum article
‘‘Management of Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms and Cerebrovascular Malformations.’’
b 12. The preferred response is B (development of poststroke epilepsy). As a group, pediatric patients with stroke
do not have different long-term cognitive outcomes than what would be expected based on population estimates;
however, some subgroups of patients with stroke are at risk for lower IQ scores. Specifically, children with
more severe neurologic impairment, those with impaired functional capacity (modified Rankin Scale score of 2 or
more), and either acute seizures or poststroke epilepsy are at risk for long-term cognitive dysfunction. For more
information, refer to pages 175Y176 of the Continuum article ‘‘Arterial Ischemic Stroke in Children and
Young Adults.’’
b 13. The preferred response is B (definite or suspected arteriopathy). In cross-sectional studies of children beyond
the perinatal period, known or suspected arteriopathy is the most common cause of stroke, accounting for
roughly 46% of strokes (36% due to known arteriopathy, 10% due to suspected arteriopathy). The combination of
congenital plus acquired heart disease is estimated to cause approximately 30% of strokes in this age group, mostly
due to congenital lesions. The other causes listed account for small proportions of the stroke burden in children of this
age. For more information, refer to pages 160Y161 of the Continuum article ‘‘Arterial Ischemic Stroke in Children
and Young Adults.’’
b 14. The preferred response is C (fluoxetine). In the Fluoxetine on Motor Rehabilitation After Ischemic Stroke
(FLAME) trial, patients with strokes resulting in hemiparesis or hemiplegia were randomly assigned to either fluoxetine
20 mg/d or placebo, starting 5 to 10 days after their stroke. In patients receiving fluoxetine, motor recovery scores
were significantly higher, even after adjusting for the anticipated antidepressant effect of this medication. This has led to
the theory that fluoxetine (and potentially other selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors [SSRIs]) may enhance
neuroplasticity after stroke. For more information, refer to page 246 of the Continuum article ‘‘Stroke Rehabilitation.’’
b 15. The preferred response is D (IV recombinant tissue plasminogen activator and consideration of mechanical
clot retrieval). This patient has a clinical presentation and brain imaging that is concerning for a large left middle
cerebral artery infarction. He is a candidate for IV thrombolytic therapy, and this should be started immediately.
However, rates of complete middle cerebral artery recanalization with IV thrombolysis are relatively low, so there is a
fairly high likelihood that this patient will also be a candidate for mechanical embolectomy if he does not have early
improvement in symptoms. Recent data show a large clinical benefit to endovascular therapy in the setting of large
intracranial vessel occlusion; it should be emphasized that the majority of patients in these recent studies were treated
with IV thrombolysis prior to embolectomy. Therefore, patients who are otherwise good candidates for thrombolysis
should still receive this treatment as opposed to proceeding directly to endovascular therapy. For more information,
refer to page 69 of the Continuum article ‘‘Treatment of Acute Ischemic Stroke.’’
b 16. The preferred response is A (aphasia). The likelihood that an episode of transient symptoms represents a
transient ischemic attack is greater when the symptoms are focal, such as hemiparesis or aphasia, than when they
are diffuse, such as loss of consciousness or generalized weakness. Although dizziness and numbness can
represent focal symptoms, these terms are used by patients to mean so many different things that they are less
specific than weakness or aphasia. For more information, refer to pages 83Y84 of the Continuum article
‘‘Diagnosis and Management of Transient Ischemic Attack.’’
b 17. The preferred response is E (severe lower extremity edema). Prophylaxis for deep venous thrombosis should
be initiated at the time patients present with a stroke that restricts mobility. Most patients treated with an
endovascular stent retriever also receive IV recombinant tissue plasminogen activator, so they should not receive
heparin prophylaxis for the first 24 hours after thrombolytic therapy, but no reason exists to delay intermittent
pneumatic compression. Contraindications to intermittent pneumatic compression include peripheral vascular disease
causing leg ischemia, leg ulcerations, dermatitis, and severe leg edema. For more information, refer to pages 99Y100 of
the Continuum article ‘‘Prevention and Management of Poststroke Complications.’’
b 18. The preferred response is E (insufficient evidence exists to determine the effect of either smokeless tobacco
or electronic cigarettes on stroke risk). The effect of smokeless tobacco on stroke risk is unclear, and the effect
of newer forms of nicotine delivery such as electronic cigarettes is even less clear. For more information, refer to
pages 25Y26 of the Continuum article ‘‘Stroke Epidemiology and Risk Factor Management.’’
b 19. The preferred response is E (mechanical mitral valve). Prosthetic valves contribute to thromboembolic risk
through thrombogenicity of the valve material in addition to altered flow dynamics around the valve replacement.
Bioprosthetic valves are less thrombogenic than mechanical valves and patients are generally treated with aspirin
(except immediately after mitral replacement). Among mechanical valves, the mitral position is associated with a
higher risk of thromboembolism; therefore, warfarin with a goal international normalized ratio (INR) of 3.0 is
recommended in these patients (as opposed to a goal of 2.5 in patients with a mechanical aortic valve and no other
risk factors for thromboembolism). For more information, refer to page 123 of the Continuum article
‘‘Cardioembolic Stroke.’’
b 20. The preferred response is E (splenium of the corpus callosum). This patient is presenting with the clinical
syndrome of alexia without agraphia. In this syndrome, patients are unable to provide any visual information to the
language centers of the dominant hemisphere, since the dominant occipital lobe is damaged and information from the
remaining occipital lobe is unable to be communicated across a damaged splenium. For more information, refer
to page 54 of the Continuum article ‘‘Clinical Evaluation of the Patient With Acute Stroke.’’
b 22. The preferred response is E (transthoracic echocardiogram). This patient is presenting with symptoms and brain
imaging of a small right hemispheric stroke. Given the normal appearance of his magnetic resonance angiogram (MRA),
an arteriopathy affecting his medium to large arteries is highly unlikely. An embolic cause of his stroke thus becomes
most likely, so proceeding with either a transthoracic or transesophageal echocardiogram should be the next step.
Atherosclerotic causes of stroke are very unlikely in patients this age, and so fasting lipids and carotid ultrasound are
low-yield tests in this case. Likewise, atrial fibrillation and other dysrhythmias are unlikely to be causative or
detected with long-term cardiac monitoring in patients like this (unlike adults with cryptogenic strokes). If a small
artery vasculitis remains a possibility, then catheter angiography can be considered once a cardioembolic cause
is ruled out. For more information, refer to page 164 of the Continuum article ‘‘Arterial Ischemic Stroke in
Children and Young Adults.’’
b 23. The preferred response is E (pneumonia). Pneumonia is the most common cause of fever in the first 48 hours
after an acute stroke. For more information, refer to page 102 of the Continuum article ‘‘Prevention and
Management of Poststroke Complications.’’
b 24. The preferred response is B (intracavernous carotid artery). Endovascular flow diversion is US Food and
Drug Administration (FDA)-approved for proximal intradural carotid circulation aneurysms such as those in the
cavernous, paraclinoid-ophthalmic segments. For more information, refer to pages 188Y189 of the Continuum article
‘‘Management of Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms and Cerebrovascular Malformations.’’
b 25. The preferred response is C (look for nonischemic causes of her symptoms). Brain imaging can identify
structural lesions that may produce symptoms that mimic transient ischemic attacks but require very different
management approaches. The diagnostic evaluation and management plan is generally the same for transient
ischemic attack and stroke, regardless of the size of the lesion. For more information, refer to page 86 of the
Continuum article ‘‘Diagnosis and Management of Transient Ischemic Attack.’’
b 26. The preferred response is B (brainstem cavernous malformation presenting with acute hemorrhage).
Patients with cavernous malformations who come to medical attention because of hemorrhage have a higher risk of
future hemorrhage than patients who present with other symptoms, and the risk of future hemorrhage is greater for
cavernous malformations located in the brainstem than for those located elsewhere. For more information, refer to
page 201 of the Continuum article ‘‘Management of Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms and Cerebrovascular
Malformations.’’
b 27. The preferred response is A (abulia). This patient is presenting with features that are strongly suggestive of a
right hemispheric stroke affecting the territory of the anterior cerebral artery. Strokes in this area classically present
with contralateral weakness that affects the leg much more than the arm, without any involvement of the face. In
addition, patients often demonstrate abulia or other neuropsychological features given the involvement of the frontal
lobe. Alexia without agraphia is seen in lesions of the dominant occipital lobe plus the splenium of the corpus
callosum. Gaze preferences are seen with strokes involving the lateral aspect of the frontal lobe, usually from
involvement of the superior division of the middle cerebral artery. Dyscalculia is commonly seen with Gerstmann
syndrome, which affects the dominant inferior parietal lobe, and extinction to double simultaneous stimulation is also
seen primarily with parietal lesions. For more information, refer to pages 51Y52 of the Continuum article ‘‘Clinical
Evaluation of the Patient With Acute Stroke.’’
b 28. The preferred response is B (IV recombinant tissue plasminogen activator). This patient is presenting with
symptoms of a left posterior cerebral artery territory stroke affecting the left occipital lobe. Although his stroke severity
is relatively mild based on the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score, his deficits would be considered
disabling in nature (given his employment as a bus driver). In the setting of mild but potentially disabling symptoms
and no contraindications to IV thrombolysis, treatment should be carried out. No evidence exists to support
mechanical embolectomy at this time point in this patient, since the patient is a candidate for thrombolysis. While
he will likely need antiplatelet therapy (although not specifically dual antiplatelet therapy) and a cardiac workup,
initiating thrombolytic therapy is the first priority. This patient’s symptoms should not be assumed to be migrainous
in nature. For more information, refer to pages 75 and 77 of the Continuum article ‘‘Treatment of Acute
Ischemic Stroke.’’
b 29. The preferred response is B (IV recombinant tissue plasminogen activator). This patient is presenting with signs
and symptoms of a right hemispheric stroke late in pregnancy, with imaging concerning for an acute occlusion
of a right middle cerebral artery branch. The health of the mother is critical in this situation, and given the severity of
the stroke symptoms described here, IV recombinant tissue plasminogen activator should be administered.
Mechanical embolectomy is unlikely to be indicated in what appears to be a branch occlusion of the right middle
cerebral artery and should not be done first in this patient who is otherwise eligible for IV recombinant tissue
plasminogen activator. IV heparin or injections of low-molecular-weight heparins are not indicated in the routine
management of acute stroke, especially in patients eligible for thrombolysis. Her symptoms are not consistent with
preeclampsia or eclampsia, so no clear indication for magnesium infusion or induction of labor exists. For more
information, refer to page 230 of the Continuum article ‘‘Inherited and Uncommon Causes of Stroke.’’
b 30. The preferred response is A (aspirin). This patient has experienced a cryptogenic stroke in the setting of a
patent foramen ovale. At present, no evidence exists to support the routine closure of patent foramen ovale
for secondary stroke prevention, although it can be considered in patients who have recurrent cerebrovascular events
while on intensive medical management. Current guidelines support the use of antiplatelet therapy (such as aspirin)
for most patients in this setting, with anticoagulation being recommended when a coexistent deep vein thrombosis or
underlying hypercoagulable state is discovered. Although strokes in patients with patent foramen ovale can occur
due to paradoxical embolism of deep vein thromboses, no role exists for placement of an inferior vena cava filter
for stroke prevention. For more information, refer to page 127 of the Continuum article ‘‘Cardioembolic Stroke.’’
b 31. The preferred response is B (25%). Predictors of stroke recovery are a valuable tool for neurologists and
rehabilitation providers for counseling patients and families on the most likely outcome after the stroke. The Early
Prediction of Functional Outcome After Stroke study (EPOS) found that in patients with no finger extension or
shoulder abduction activity after 2 days, the likelihood of gaining significant dexterity in that limb was only 25%.
If no movement was present by 9 days, the likelihood dropped to only 14%. For more information, refer to
page 242 of the Continuum article ‘‘Stroke Rehabilitation.’’
b 32. The preferred response is B (normal head impulse test). Acute onset of dizziness or vertigo can be related
to either a central etiology (such as stroke) or a peripheral process involving the inner ear. The HINTS approach
(head impulse test, pattern of nystagmus, and test for skew) can be used to help distinguish these two possibilities.
Patients with normal head impulse testing, multidirectional nystagmus, and skew deviations are more likely to have a
central cause of their symptoms. Vertigo of both central and peripheral etiologies is likely to worsen with movement and
thus does not assist much in the diagnostic process. Tinnitus is also relatively nonlocalizing, although it may be more
likely with peripheral lesions. For more information, refer to page 56 of the Continuum article ‘‘Clinical Evaluation of
the Patient With Acute Stroke.’’
b 33. The preferred response is B (expressive aphasia). Melodic intonation therapy is a rehabilitation technique
that uses melody, rhythm, and other musical elements to enhance language production. This is specifically used
in patients with expressive aphasia who do not have significant bihemispheric damage. The theory behind melodic
intonation therapy is that singing appears to primarily localize to the nondominant hemisphere and that language that
is expressed in a musical sense may be able to originate from these unaffected areas. For more information, refer to
page 245 of the Continuum article ‘‘Stroke Rehabilitation.’’
b 34. The preferred response is D (Mediterranean diet). In a controlled trial, the risk of a composite cardiovascular
disease end point was lower in the group assigned to the Mediterranean diet than in the group assigned to a
control low-fat diet. Secondary end point analysis also showed a significant decline in stroke risk in the group
assigned to the Mediterranean diet. Although some evidence indicates that soda intake is associated with an increased
stroke risk and moderate consumption of coffee or wine may be associated with a reduced stroke risk, these have
not been investigated in controlled trials. The Atkins diet has not been studied extensively in controlled trials. For more
information, refer to pages 26Y28 of the Continuum article ‘‘Stroke Epidemiology and Risk Factor Management.’’
b 36. The preferred response is B (none). Angioplasty and stenting have not been found to be more effective than
aggressive medical management alone for stroke prevention in patients with intracranial atherosclerosis or in
any subgroup of those patients, even patients who were already taking aspirin at the time of their ischemic
symptoms. For more information, refer to pages 149Y150 of the Continuum article ‘‘Large Artery Atherosclerotic
Occlusive Disease.’’
b 37. The preferred response is E (nonatherosclerotic cause of stroke). High-potency statin therapy is indicated
in patients with clinical manifestations of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, regardless of low-density lipoprotein
level; this includes patients who have had a transient ischemic attack or stroke. Moderate-potency statin therapy is an
acceptable alternative in patients older than 75 years, but high-potency statin therapy is recommended for patients
younger than 75 years. Diabetes mellitus is not a contraindication to high-potency statin therapy; in fact, patients with
diabetes mellitus should receive either moderate-potency or high-potency statin therapy, depending on their 10-year
risk for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. Strokes from nonatherosclerotic causes do not require high-potency
statin therapy. For more information, refer to pages 21Y22 of the Continuum article ‘‘Stroke Epidemiology and Risk
Factor Management.’’
b 38. The preferred response is B (no antithrombotic therapy). This patient is presenting with strokes due to septic
emboli in the setting of enterococcal endocarditis. Although his strokes are embolic in nature, antithrombotic therapy
is often held in the setting of endocarditis because of a higher incidence of intracranial hemorrhage in these patients.
For more information, refer to page 126 of the Continuum article ‘‘Cardioembolic Stroke.’’
b 39. The preferred response is B (diffuse subcortical T2 hyperintensity, including the anterior temporal lobes).
This patient’s presentation is highly suggestive of cerebral autosomal dominant arteriopathy with subcortical
infarcts and leukoencephalopathy (CADASIL). This is based on her history of subcortical infarcts without the typical
risk factors associated with this vascular disease (eg, hypertension, diabetes mellitus); her history of migraine
with aura; and her family history of migraines, stroke, and early cognitive impairment. Imaging in CADASIL shows
diffuse T2 white matter hyperintensities, often including the anterior temporal region and the external capsule.
Posterior circulation dolichoectasia is most commonly associated with Fabry disease. Loss of flow voids in the distal
internal carotid arteries and abnormal lenticulostriate vessels is seen in moyamoya disease. Superficial siderosis
is seen in a number of conditions, including cerebral amyloid angiopathy. For more information, refer to
pages 217Y218 of the Continuum article ‘‘Inherited and Uncommon Causes of Stroke.’’
b 40. The preferred response is D (presence of an isolated third nerve palsy). Treatment of an unruptured
intracranial aneurysm is generally recommended when the aneurysm is causing symptoms, such as an isolated
cranial nerve palsy. Patients younger than 70 years of age have a lower risk of aneurysmal rupture than patients
older than 70. The risk of aneurysmal rupture is not substantially affected by a history of migraine, diabetes mellitus,
or the presence of an additional small unruptured aneurysm in the internal carotid artery. For more information,
refer to pages 187Y188 of the Continuum article ‘‘Management of Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms and
Cerebrovascular Malformations.’’
Address correspondence to
Dr Kevin M. Barrett, Mayo
Clinic, 4500 San Pablo Rd S,
Patient Management Problem
Cannaday 2EVNeurology,
Jacksonville, FL 32224, Kevin M. Barrett, MD, MSc
[email protected].
Relationship Disclosure:
Dr Barrett serves on the
editorial board of Neurology,
has received research/grant
The following Patient Management Problem was chosen to reinforce the subject matter
support from the National presented in the issue. It emphasizes decisions facing the practicing physician. As you
Institute of Neurological read through the case you will be asked to complete 12 questions regarding history,
Disorders and Stroke for examination, diagnostic evaluation, therapy, and management. For each item, select the
serving on the executive
committees of the CREST-2 single best response.
and SHINE clinical trials, and To obtain CME credits for this activity, subscribers must complete this Patient
receives publishing royalties Management Problem online at aan.com/continuum/cme. A tally sheet is provided
from Wiley Blackwell.
Unlabeled Use of
with this issue to allow the option of marking answers before entering them online. A
Products/Investigational faxable scorecard is available only upon request to subscribers who do not have
Use Disclosure: computer access or to nonsubscribers who have purchased single back issues (send an
Dr Barrett reports email to [email protected]).
no disclosure.
* 2017 American Academy
Upon completion of the Patient Management Problem, participants may earn up
of Neurology. to 2 AMA PRA Category 1 Creditsi. Participants have up to 3 years from the date of
publication to earn CME credits. No CME will be awarded for this issue after
February 29, 2020.
Learning Objectives:
Upon completion of this activity, the participant will be able to:
& Identify patients with acute ischemic stroke who are eligible for acute
reperfusion therapy
& Interpret and describe the utility of advanced neuroimaging to select
patients who may benefit from mechanical thrombectomy
& Recognize and manage early poststroke complications
Case
The acute stroke team receives prehospital notification from emergency
medical services regarding a 78-year-old man with left-sided weakness en route
to the emergency department for stroke evaluation. The patient had lunch
with his wife from 1:00 to 1:45 PM and seemed fine. Immediately after lunch,
he went to take his usual 1-hour afternoon nap. When he awoke from his nap
at 2:45 PM, he fell while trying to get out of bed, and his wife noted that
he was not moving his left side. She called emergency medical services, and
an ambulance arrived at 3:15 PM. At the time of prehospital assessment,
the patient was noted to have no movement of his left arm or left leg
and slurred speech.
He arrives at the hospital at 3:50 PM. His past medical history is remarkable
for hypertension, hyperlipidemia, type 2 diabetes mellitus, and obstructive
sleep apnea. He has no prior history of transient ischemic attack or stroke.
On examination, the patient has a right head and gaze preference, decreased
blink to threat from the left visual hemifield, left lower facial weakness, no
antigravity power in the left arm and left leg, moderate dysarthria, and
left-sided hemispatial neglect. His National Institutes of Health Stroke
Scale (NIHSS) score is 16.
b 2. Which of the following etiologies is the most likely cause of the patient’s symptoms?
A. basilar artery occlusion
B. right middle cerebral artery (MCA) occlusion
C. right posterior cerebral artery occlusion
D. small vessel occlusion (eg, penetrating artery disease)
E. superior sagittal sinus thrombosis
b 3. Which of the following is the most appropriate next step in this patient’s management?
A. brain MRI
B. carotid duplex ultrasound
C. cerebral angiography
D. endovascular neurosurgical consultation
E. noncontrast head CT
Additional history is obtained by the stroke team while the patient is undergoing CT. He has no
prior history of intracranial hemorrhage, transient ischemic attack, or stroke. No convulsions were
witnessed at symptom onset, and he has no history of any recent surgical procedure, gastrointestinal
or genitourinary bleeding, oral anticoagulant use, or bleeding diathesis. His initial blood pressure
is 173/87 mm Hg and finger stick blood glucose is 190 mg/dL. Laboratory results are pending.
Head CT is remarkable for a hyperdense right MCA sign, loss of gray-white differentiation in the
insular cortex, and mild sulcal effacement in the right MCA distribution. There is no evidence of acute
intracranial hemorrhage.
As part of the brain attack protocol at the comprehensive stroke center, the patient undergoes CT
angiography (CTA) of the head and neck and CT perfusion study of the brain. The acute stroke team
reviews the images in the CT control room (PMP Figure 1).
PMP FIGURE 1 Imaging of patient. A, Maximum intensity projection coronal CT angiography; B, CT perfusion cerebral
blood flow map; C, CT perfusion blood volume map.
b 6. Which of the following is the most accurate interpretation of the CT angiogram (PMP Figure 1A)?
A. no relevant occlusion is seen to explain the patient’s symptoms
B. occlusion of the proximal right anterior cerebral artery (ACA)
C. occlusion of the proximal right MCA
D. occlusion of the proximal right MCA and ACA with inadequate collateral flow
E. occlusion of the right internal carotid artery with distal reconstitution
b 7. Which of the following is the most accurate interpretation of the CT perfusion study (PMP Figures 1B
and 1C)?
A. normal blood flow, normal blood volume, normal mean transit time in the right MCA territory
B. normal blood flow, normal blood volume, prolonged mean transit time in the right MCA territory
C. preserved blood flow and reduced blood volume in the right MCA territory
D. reduced blood flow and preserved blood volume in the right MCA territory
C. reduced blood flow and reduced blood volume in the right MCA territory
After treatment with IV rtPA followed by mechanical thrombectomy with good recanalization,
the patient is transferred to the intensive care unit for continuous neurologic assessment. His
NIHSS score has improved from 16 to 5. His examination is remarkable for mild dysarthria, mild
hemisensory disturbance, and mild weakness of the left face, arm, and leg. Approximately 6 hours
after monitoring in the intensive care unit, he begins to report headache and nausea, and he is
unable to lift his left arm off the bed. At the time of neurologic deterioration, his blood pressure is
108/75 mm Hg and his pulse is 103.
b 9. Which of the following is the most appropriate next emergent diagnostic step?
A. bedside EEG
B. complete blood cell count, PT, and INR
C. lumbar puncture
D. MRI brain without contrast
E. noncontrast head CT
Noncontrast head CT shows no evidence of acute intracranial hemorrhage. The patient receives
150 mL of normal saline, and his blood pressure responds with a repeat measurement of
130/80 mm Hg. Strength in his left arm improves, with only a minor drift on neurologic reassessment.
One poststroke day 2, he undergoes a carotid duplex, which demonstrates significant atheromatous
plaque on the B-mode imaging and a peak systolic velocity of 330 cm/s at the origin of the right
internal carotid artery. Transthoracic echocardiogram shows mitral annular calcification and
estimated left ventricular ejection fraction of 55%. His low-density lipoprotein is 130 mg/dL.
b 10. Which of the following is the most likely ischemic stroke mechanism?
A. artery-to-artery embolism from high-grade right internal carotid artery stenosis
B. cardiogenic embolism due to mitral annular calcification
C. cryptogenic stroke
D. inherited or acquired prothrombotic state
E. small vessel arteriopathy due to hyperlipidemia
b 11. Which of the following is the optimal evidence-based approach to secondary stroke prevention in
this patient?
A. carotid revascularization
B. dual antiplatelet therapy with aspirin 325 mg/d plus clopidogrel 75 mg/d
C. high-dose statin therapy
D. oral anticoagulation with dosage-adjusted warfarin (goal INR 2 to 3)
E. treatment with a direct oral anticoagulant (direct thrombin inhibitor or factor Xa inhibitor)
Learning Objectives:
Upon completion of this activity, the participant will be able to:
& Identify patients with acute ischemic stroke who are eligible for acute
reperfusion therapy
& Interpret and describe the utility of advanced neuroimaging to select patients
who may benefit from mechanical thrombectomy
& Recognize and manage early poststroke complications
Case
The acute stroke team receives prehospital notification from emergency medical
services regarding a 78-year-old man with left-sided weakness en route to the
emergency department for stroke evaluation. The patient had lunch with his wife
from 1:00 to 1:45 PM and seemed fine. Immediately after lunch, he went to take his
usual 1-hour afternoon nap. When he awoke from his nap at 2:45 PM, he fell while
trying to get out of bed, and his wife noted that he was not moving his left side.
She called emergency medical services, and an ambulance arrived at 3:15 PM. At the
time of prehospital assessment, the patient was noted to have no movement of his
left arm or left leg and slurred speech.
He arrives at the hospital at 3:50 PM. His past medical history is remarkable for
hypertension, hyperlipidemia, type 2 diabetes mellitus, and obstructive sleep
apnea. He has no prior history of transient ischemic attack or stroke. On examination,
the patient has a right head and gaze preference, decreased blink to threat from the
left visual hemifield, left lower facial weakness, no antigravity power in the left arm
and left leg, moderate dysarthria, and left-sided hemispatial neglect. His National
Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score is 16.
b 1. Which of the following is the most accurate time to document for stroke onset?
A. 1:00 PM
B. 1:45 PM
C. 2:45 PM
D. 3:15 PM
E. 3:50 PM
The preferred response is B (1:45 PM). The most appropriate time to document for stroke onset is the last time
the patient was known to be well. In this case, although he noted the symptoms upon awakening from his nap,
he was last known well at 1:45 PM before taking a nap, so that would be the correct time to document as time
of onset. Determining last known well time should be a priority during the initial acute stroke evaluation.1
For patients who have symptoms upon awakening, last known well time is often the time when they went to bed.
Time of onset provided by prehospital personnel should be verified, as initial reports may not be accurate or
new information may become available during transportation to the emergency department or after family arrival.
Advanced neuroimaging may play a role in patients with unknown time of onset or when symptoms present upon
awakening, but the optimal evidence-based neuroimaging approach has yet to be established.
1. Jauch EC, Saver JL, Adams HP Jr, et al. Guidelines for the early management of patients with acute ischemic stroke: a guideline
for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke 2013;44(3):870Y947.
doi:10.1161/STR.0b013e318284056a.
b 2. Which of the following etiologies is the most likely cause of the patient’s symptoms?
A. basilar artery occlusion
B. right middle cerebral artery (MCA) occlusion
C. right posterior cerebral artery occlusion
D. small vessel occlusion (eg, penetrating artery disease)
E. superior sagittal sinus thrombosis
The preferred response is B (right middle cerebral artery [MCA] occlusion). The combination of right gaze
preference, left homonymous hemianopia, left hemiplegia, and hemispatial neglect is most suggestive of ischemia
in the right MCA distribution secondary to occlusion of the proximal M1 segment.1,2 Right posterior cerebral
artery occlusion would be expected to cause contralateral homonymous hemianopia without hemiplegia or gaze
preference. Lacunar infarction due to small vessel occlusion involves subcortical structures and would not be
expected to result in cortical signs such as gaze preference, homonymous hemianopia, or hemispatial neglect. Basilar
artery occlusion generally presents with prominent bulbar signs (eg, ocular motility impairment, facial weakness,
dysarthria) and motor deficits that may be bilateral in cases of ventral pontine ischemia. Superior sagittal sinus
thrombosis may cause venous infarction with clinical signs and symptoms that are not referable to
defined arterial territories.
1. Brazis PW, Masdeu JC, Biller J. Localization in clinical neurology. 5th edition. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2007.
2. Southerland AM. Clinical evaluation of the patient with acute stroke. Continuum (Minneap Minn) 2017;23(1 Cerebrovascular
Disease):40Y61.
b 3. Which of the following is the most appropriate next step in this patient’s management?
A. brain MRI
B. carotid duplex ultrasound
C. cerebral angiography
D. endovascular neurosurgical consultation
E. noncontrast head CT
1. Powers WJ, Derdeyn CP, Biller J, et al. 2015 American Heart Association/American Stroke Association focused update of the 2013 guidelines
for the early management of patients with acute ischemic stroke regarding endovascular treatment. Stroke 2015;46(10):3020Y3035.
doi:10.1161/STR.0000000000000074.
b 4. Which of the following is a radiographic contraindication to treatment with IV recombinant tissue plasminogen
activator (rtPA)?
A. chronic small vessel ischemic changes in the subcortical white matter
B. hyperdense MCA sign
C. intracranial hemorrhage
D. loss of gray-white differentiation in the insular cortex
E. sulcal effacement in the cortical ribbon
1. Patel SC, Levine SR, Tilley BC, et al. Lack of clinical significance of early ischemic changes on computed tomography in acute stroke.
JAMA 2001;286(22):2830Y2838. doi:10.1001/jama.286.22.2830.
Additional history is obtained by the stroke team while the patient is undergoing CT. He has no prior history of
intracranial hemorrhage, transient ischemic attack, or stroke. No convulsions were witnessed at symptom onset,
and he has no history of any recent surgical procedure, gastrointestinal or genitourinary bleeding, oral
anticoagulant use, or bleeding diathesis. His initial blood pressure is 173/87 mm Hg and finger stick blood glucose
is 190 mg/dL. Laboratory results are pending. Head CT is remarkable for a hyperdense right MCA sign, loss of
gray-white differentiation in the insular cortex, and mild sulcal effacement in the right MCA distribution. There is
no evidence of acute intracranial hemorrhage.
The preferred response is E (treatment with IV rtPA 0.9 mg/kg). In the absence of absolute contraindications to
treatment, IV rtPA 0.9 mg/kg should be initiated without delay. IV rtPA remains the mainstay of evidence-based
reperfusion therapy for acute ischemic stroke.1 The results of platelet count, PT, and INR should not delay
administration of rtPA in patients without history of oral anticoagulant use or bleeding diathesis. The results
should be monitored as they become available, but the likelihood of identifying a previously unknown laboratory
contraindication to rtPA is low, and the overall benefit of earlier administration of thrombolysis outweighs the
risk.2 Extreme elevation of blood pressure (higher than 185/110 mm Hg) warrants initiation of antihypertensive
therapy before administration of thrombolysis but is not an absolute contraindication to therapy. IV heparin has
no evidence-based role in the early management of acute ischemic stroke. The patient’s clinicoradiographic syndrome
is suggestive of large vessel occlusion that may be amenable to mechanical thrombectomy, but consideration
of endovascular therapy should not preclude or delay administration of IV rtPA.
1. The National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke rt-PA Stroke Study Group. Tissue plasminogen activator for acute ischemic
stroke. N Engl J Med 1995;333(24):1581Y1587. doi:10.1056/NEJM199512143332401.
2. Demaerschalk BM, Kleindorfer DO, Adeoye OM, et al. Scientific rationale for the inclusion and exclusion criteria for intravenous
alteplase in acute ischemic stroke: a statement for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke
Association. Stroke 2016;47(2):581Y641. doi:10.1161/STR.0000000000000086.
As part of the brain attack protocol at the comprehensive stroke center, the patient undergoes CT angiography
(CTA) of the head and neck and CT perfusion study of the brain. The acute stroke team reviews the images in the
CT control room (PMP Figure 1).
PMP FIGURE 1 Imaging of patient. A, Maximum intensity projection coronal CT angiography; B, CT perfusion cerebral
blood flow map; C, CT perfusion blood volume map.
The preferred response is C (occlusion of the proximal right MCA). CTA has excellent sensitivity to diagnose
proximal intracranial large vessel occlusion (as seen in this patient) in patients with suspected stroke.1 In cases
of partial occlusion, the filling defect is accompanied by evidence of some contrast filling in an antegrade
fashion beyond the area of thrombosis. CTA is not sensitive to assessment of collateral flow without additional
information from perfusion studies.
1. van Seeters T, Biessels GJ, Kappelle LJ, et al. The prognostic value of CT angiography and CT perfusion in acute ischemic stroke.
Cerebrovasc Dis 2015;40(5Y6):258Y269. doi:10.1159/000441088.
b 7. Which of the following is the most accurate interpretation of the CT perfusion study (PMP Figures 1B and 1C)?
A. normal blood flow, normal blood volume, normal mean transit time in the right MCA territory
B. normal blood flow, normal blood volume, prolonged mean transit time in the right MCA territory
C. preserved blood flow and reduced blood volume in the right MCA territory
D. reduced blood flow and preserved blood volume in the right MCA territory
E. reduced blood flow and reduced blood volume in the right MCA territory
The preferred response is D (reduced blood flow and preserved blood volume in the right MCA territory).
The cerebral blood flow map shows diminished blood flow in the distribution of the right MCA (PMP Figure 1B)
and preserved to increased blood volume in the right MCA territory (PMP Figure 1B), a pattern suggestive
of brain at risk (ie, penumbra) that could be potentially salvageable if recanalization can be achieved in a timely
fashion.1 The two CT perfusion sequences shown in PMP Figure 1 are the cerebral blood flow (PMP Figure 1B)
and blood volume (PMP Figure 1C) maps; the mean transit time is not included in the figure.
1. Biesbroek JM, Niesten JM, Dankbaar JW, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of CT perfusion imaging for detecting acute ischemic stroke: a
systematic review and meta-analysis. Cerebrovasc Dis 2013;35(6):493Y501. doi:10.1159/000350200.
b 8. What is the most appropriate next evidence-based step in the management of this patient?
A. admission to the intensive care unit and withholding of antithrombotic therapy for 24 hours
B. echocardiography to evaluate for the proximal source of embolism
C. induced hypertension to augment collateral flow during infusion of IV rtPA
D. intensive monitoring for 24 hours following treatment with IV thrombolysis
E. mechanical thrombectomy with retrievable stent technology
The preferred response is E (mechanical thrombectomy with retrievable stent technology). Multiple randomized
clinical trials and meta-analyses have demonstrated the superiority of mechanical thrombectomy with retrievable
stent technology combined with IV rtPA compared to IV rtPA alone in patients with large vessel occlusion.1 Patients
with CTA evidence of proximal MCA occlusion within 6 hours of symptom onset and a favorable perfusion profile
should be offered this therapeutic option. No evidence supports induced hypertension in acute ischemic stroke,
and severe hypertension is associated with increased risk of hemorrhage in patients treated with IV thrombolysis.
Post-thrombolysis monitoring for neurologic deterioration, avoidance of antithrombotic therapy, and evaluation for
stroke mechanism are all acceptable practices but should not preclude the patient being treated with mechanical
thrombectomy at a comprehensive stroke center with the necessary resources for acute stroke intervention.
1. Goyal M, Menon BK, van Zwam WH, et al. Endovascular thrombectomy after large-vessel ischaemic stroke: a meta-analysis of individual
patient data from five randomised trials. Lancet 2016;387(10029):1723Y1731. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(16)00163-X.
After treatment with IV rtPA followed by mechanical thrombectomy with good recanalization, the patient is
transferred to the intensive care unit for continuous neurologic assessment. His NIHSS score has improved from
16 to 5. His examination is remarkable for mild dysarthria, mild hemisensory disturbance, and mild weakness
of the left face, arm, and leg. Approximately 6 hours after monitoring in the intensive care unit, he begins to
report headache and nausea, and he is unable to lift his left arm off the bed. At the time of neurologic
deterioration, his blood pressure is 108/75 mm Hg and his pulse is 103.
b 9. Which of the following is the most appropriate next emergent diagnostic step?
A. bedside EEG
B. complete blood cell count, PT, and INR
C. lumbar puncture
D. MRI brain without contrast
E. noncontrast head CT
The preferred response is E (noncontrast head CT). Noncontrast head CT should be ordered without delay
in patients treated with acute reperfusion therapy (IV rtPA, mechanical thrombectomy, or combined) and
neurologic deterioration to promptly exclude intracranial hemorrhage.1 Laboratory assessment of coagulopathy
may be part of the overall management strategy but should not delay CT imaging to exclude intracranial
hemorrhage. If no evidence of intracranial hemorrhage or recurrent ischemia exists, then one could consider EEG
to evaluate for epileptiform activity. MRI is usually not practical in the acute setting to exclude an intracerebral
hemorrhage. No indication for lumbar puncture exists in this patient, and it would be contraindicated in
the immediate post-rtPA period.
1. Jauch EC, Saver JL, Adams HP Jr, et al. Guidelines for the early management of patients with acute ischemic stroke: a guideline for
healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke 2013;44(3):870Y947. doi:10.1161/
STR.0b013e318284056a.
Noncontrast head CT shows no evidence of acute intracranial hemorrhage. The patient receives 150 mL of
normal saline, and his blood pressure responds with a repeat measurement of 130/80 mm Hg. Strength in his left
arm improves, with only a minor drift on neurologic reassessment. One poststroke day 2, he undergoes a
carotid duplex, which demonstrates significant atheromatous plaque on the B-mode imaging and a peak systolic
velocity of 330 cm/s at the origin of the right internal carotid artery. Transthoracic echocardiogram shows mitral
annular calcification and estimated left ventricular ejection fraction of 55%. His low-density lipoprotein is
130 mg/dL.
b 10. Which of the following is the most likely ischemic stroke mechanism?
A. artery-to-artery embolism from high-grade right internal carotid artery stenosis
B. cardiogenic embolism due to mitral annular calcification
C. cryptogenic stroke
D. inherited or acquired prothrombotic state
E. small vessel arteriopathy due to hyperlipidemia
1. Mohr JP, Wolf PA, Grotta JC, et al. Stroke: pathophysiology, diagnosis, and management. Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier Saunders, 2011.
b 11. Which of the following is the optimal evidence-based approach to secondary stroke prevention in this patient?
A. carotid revascularization
B. dual antiplatelet therapy with aspirin 325 mg/d plus clopidogrel 75 mg/d
C. high-dose statin therapy
D. oral anticoagulation with dosage-adjusted warfarin (goal INR 2 to 3)
E. treatment with a direct oral anticoagulant (direct thrombin inhibitor or factor Xa inhibitor)
The preferred response is A (carotid revascularization). Carotid revascularization is an established safe and
effective approach to secondary stroke prevention in high-grade symptomatic internal carotid artery stenosis.1
Carotid endarterectomy and carotid angioplasty and stenting are equally effective in preventing the composite
outcome of stroke, myocardial infarction, and death when performed by skilled operators. For the outcome
of stroke alone, carotid endarterectomy is more effective than carotid angioplasty and stenting and is the favored
procedure in individuals older than 70 years of age. Oral anticoagulation is indicated to prevent stroke in patients
with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation.2 Dual antiplatelet therapy is the most effective secondary stroke prevention
strategy in patients with high-grade symptomatic intracranial atherosclerotic occlusive disease.3 High-dose statin
is the mainstay of intensive medical therapy but should not preclude carotid revascularization in this case.
1. Kernan WN, Ovbiagele B, Black HR, et al. Guidelines for the prevention of stroke in patients with stroke and transient ischemic attack: a
guideline for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke 2014;45(7):2160-2236.
doi:10.1161/STR.0000000000000024.
2. Patel MR, Mahaffey KW, Garg J, et al. Rivaroxaban versus warfarin in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med 2011;365(10):883Y891.
doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1009638.
3. Chimowitz MI, Lynn MJ, Derdeyn CP, et al. Stenting versus aggressive medical therapy for intracranial arterial stenosis. N Engl J Med
2011;365(11):993Y1003. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1105335.
The patient undergoes uncomplicated right carotid endarterectomy on hospital day 5. He is discharged to
acute inpatient rehabilitation and subsequently to home with his wife. At the time of outpatient neurology
follow-up 3 months poststroke, he is able to walk without assistance and does not require assistance with
activities of daily living.
Head Position in Stroke Trial (HeadPoST), 63, 78r preeclampsia/eclampsia and, 231
Headache statins for, 21Y23, 22t, 23c, 23f, 136t
in children, 159t, 172c, 173c stroke risk and, 15, 17, 21c, 36r, 135
with dipyridamole-aspirin therapy, 34 CADASIL and, 219
due to cavernous malformation, 199 in children and young adults, 160t, 161, 175
with intracerebral hemorrhage, 200 Hypertension
due to cerebral amyloid angiopathy, 225 in acute stroke, 43Y44
due to moyamoya disease, 172c, 223, 235r diabetes mellitus and, 18
due to unruptured intracranial aneurysm, 185 diet and, 28c
migraine, 59t goal blood pressure for, 18, 21c
in CADASIL, 211, 215Y216, 216c, 234r management of, 18, 36r, 136t, 138
morning, 104t lifestyle modifications, 19Y21
in pregnancy-related PRES, 229c medications, 18Y19, 19f, 20f, 21c
Health Professionals Follow-Up Study, 26 in metabolic syndrome, 24
Heart failure, 18, 62 obstructive sleep apnea and, 32
antiplatelet therapy for stroke prevention in, prevalence of, 17
128, 132r race and, 18
atrial fibrillation and, 128 stroke risk and, 15, 17Y22, 135+
cardioembolic stroke risk in, 128 CHADS2 to estimate risk in atrial
CHADS2 tool in atrial fibrillation, 114, 115c, fibrillation, 114
116t, 117t tobacco use and, 25
carotid artery stenting in, 143 Hypertonic saline, for cerebral edema, 98
hemorrhage after rtPA in, 95 Hypoglycemia, 59t, 63, 85
malignant cerebral edema and, 97 Hypothermia, 64
pediatric stroke and, 160t, 164
use of hypertonic saline in, 98
Hemicraniectomy, decompressive, 98c, 98f, 99, I
254c, 262 ICA. See Internal carotid artery
Hemicraniectomy After Middle Cerebral Artery ICARE (Interdisciplinary Comprehensive Arm
Infarction With Life-threatening Edema Trial Rehabilitation Evaluation) trial, 243
(HAMLET), 99 ICH. See Intracerebral hemorrhage
Hemoglobin A1c, 24 Idarucizumab, for dabigatran reversal, 119t, 120,
Heparin 120t, 131r
for children, 170 IDEAL (Incremental Decrease in Endpoints
prophylaxis for venous thromboembolism, Through Aggressive Lipid Lowering) trial, 22
99Y100, 101t, 108r ILAE (International League Against Epilepsy), 200
rtPA use and, 66t, 100 Incidence of stroke, 15Y16
vs. warfarin in nonbacterial thrombotic in children and young adults, 158Y159
endocarditis, 126 Incremental Decrease in Endpoints Through
Highly Effective Reperfusion Evaluated in Multiple Aggressive Lipid Lowering (IDEAL) trial, 22
Endovascular Stroke (HERMES) meta-analysis, Infections
95Y97 associated with infective endocarditis, 125
HINTS acronym, in vertigo, 56, 61r poststroke, 64, 65, 102
Hip fracture, poststroke, 102Y103, 108rY109r in children, 175
History taking, in acute stroke evaluation, 42Y43 stroke due to, 211, 212t
HIV (human immunodeficiency virus) disease, VIPS study, 160Y161, 162, 173, 178r
125, 212t Infective endocarditis, 104Y106
Homocysteine and stroke risk, 33, 138 Inferior vena cava filter, 100
in children, 166, 166t, 167, 168, 169, 179r Insulin resistance, 24, 28, 29, 38r, 136t. See also
HTRA1 gene, 220Y221, 232, 234r Diabetes mellitus
Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) disease, Insulin Resistance Intervention After Stroke (IRIS)
125, 212t trial, 24
Hyperglycemia, 28, 63, 68, 77r, 84, 95. See also Insulin therapy, 63
Diabetes mellitus Interdisciplinary Comprehensive Arm Rehabilitation
Hyperlipidemia. See also Cholesterol Evaluation (ICARE) trial, 243
atherosclerotic occlusive disease and, 22Y23, Internal carotid artery (ICA) aneurysm, 184,
135, 138, 143c, 151c, 153c 186t, 189
aortic arch, 128 Internal carotid artery (ICA) occlusion/infarction,
diet and, 28 23c, 47Y48, 48t, 63
genetic dyslipidemia, 33 in children, 172c, 172f
carotid stenosis management and, 137, 147 NINDS. See National Institute of Neurological
gout and, 155r Disorders and Stroke
hormonal contraception and, 236r NOACs. See Novel oral anticoagulants
Mediterranean diet and, 26 NOMAS (Northern Manhattan Study), 33, 35r, 39r
rtPA use after, 67t Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, 115,
TIA and, 86 118t, 136t
tobacco use and, 25, 36r North American Symptomatic Carotid
Myopathy, statin-induced, 22Y23, 23c, 36r Endarterectomy Trial (NASCET), 137Y138,
144Y145
Northern Manhattan Study (NOMAS), 33, 35r, 39r
N NOTCH3 gene, 216c, 217, 218, 234r
NASCET (North American Symptomatic Carotid Nothnagel syndrome, 53t
Endarterectomy Trial), 137Y138, 144Y145 Novel oral anticoagulants (NOACs), 120t
National Institute of Neurological Disorders and cost of, 120
Stroke (NINDS), 178r to prevent stroke in atrial fibrillation, 111, 115c,
genome-wide association study of stroke, 138Y139 118Y120
study of rtPA for acute ischemic stroke, 79r, trials of, 118, 131r
94, 107r vs. warfarin, 118Y120, 119t
National Institutes of Health (NIH) rtPA use and, 75, 120
genome-wide association study of stroke, use in cerebral amyloid angiopathy, 225Y226
138Y139 use in patients with mechanical heart valves,
POINT trial, 90 124, 125t
National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale Nurses’ Health Study, 26
(NIHSS), 40, 41t, 44, 46c, 51c, 55c, 59, 60r,
79r, 98c
biases in, 44 O
certification training, 59 Obesity/overweight, 96c
for mechanical thrombectomy, 70t, 72c, 72t, 76c dosing of novel oral anticoagulants in, 120
in remote stroke management, 259c, 261, 265t large artery atherosclerosis and, 135, 136t, 153c
for rtPA, 44, 64, 65f, 67t, 68c sleep-disordered breathing and, 104t
intracerebral hemorrhage, 94, 96c stroke risk and, 15, 17, 28Y29, 38r
in pregnancy, 230c in young adults, 160t, 175, 177
in young adults, 176 in stroke survivors, 29
Natural history of stroke, 240Y242 Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA)
Neglect, poststroke, 29, 48t, 96c atrial fibrillation and, 123c
bedside testing for extinction in, 50 continuous positive airway pressure for, 32,
fall risk and, 102 39r, 103, 104, 109r
on NIHSS, 44 CPAP for, 32, 39r, 103, 104, 105, 109r
nondominant (right) MCA stroke, 48, 48t, 49Y50 hypertension and, 32
rotigotine for, 252r large-vessel atherosclerosis and, 136t, 138, 153c
Neonatal stroke, 177rY179r. See also Childhood poststroke, 103Y105, 109r
and young adult ischemic stroke stroke risk and, 15, 32, 38rY39r
acute management of, 170 SLEEP TIGHT study, 155r
incidence of, 158, 159 in young adults, 161t
outcomes after, 175 Occupational therapy, 204c, 243, 244
recurrence risk for, 163, 167, 171 One-and-a-half syndrome, 53t
risk factors for, 162, 178r Oral hypoglycemic drugs, 24
secondary prevention of, 171Y173 Orolingual angioedema, rtPA-induced, 68,
thrombophilia and, 166, 168, 179r 93Y94, 106r
Neural regeneration, 240 OSA. See Obstructive sleep apnea
Osmotic therapy, for cerebral edema, 97Y98
Neurocritical care. See Life-sustaining therapy
O’Sullivan sign on MRI, in CADASIL, 217, 217f
Neuroplasticity and rehabilitation, 238, 240, 241f,
Oxford Vascular Study (OXVASC), 92r, 151Y152
245, 246, 247, 251r
in children, 163c
Neuroprotective agents, 63, 78 P
Niacin, 33, 136t PAIS (Paracetamol (Acetaminophen) in Stroke)
Nicardipine, 44, 96c trial, 79r
Nicotine replacement therapy, 25, 37r Palliative care, 256, 257, 258r
NIHSS. See National Institutes of Health Paracetamol (Acetaminophen) in Stroke (PAIS)
Stroke Scale trial, 79r
PRISMS (Phase IIIB, Double-Blind, Multicenter Rankin Scale score, 27, 65f, 69, 70t, 79r, 99, 176,
Study to Evaluation the Efficacy and Safety of 197t, 243, 249, 265, 266t
Alteplase in Patients With Mild Stoke: Rapidly RCVS (reversible cerebral vasoconstriction
Improving Symptoms and Neurologic Deficits) syndrome), in pregnancy, 211, 212t, 228, 229,
trial, 77, 80r 229c, 232
PROactive (Prospective Pioglitazone Clinical Trial RE-LY (Randomized Evaluation of Long-Term
in Macrovascular Events), 24, 37r Anticoagulant Therapy With Dabigatran
A Prospective, Multicenter, Randomized Etexilate) trial, 118, 131r
Controlled Trial to Evaluate the Safety and REasons for Geographic and Racial Differences in
Efficacy of the STARFlex Septal Closure System Stroke (REGARDS) study, 16, 27, 35r
Versus Best Medical Therapy in Patients With Recanalization, 62, 63. See also Mechanical
a Stroke and/or Transient Ischemic Attack Due thrombectomy/stenting; Recombinant tissue
to Presumed Paradoxical Embolism Through a plasminogen activator
Patent Foramen Ovale (CLOSURE I), 126Y127 for basilar artery occlusion, 77, 81r
Prospective Pioglitazone Clinical Trial in in children, 171
Macrovascular Events (PROactive), 24, 37r malignant cerebral edema after, 98c
Protein C deficiency, 166, 166t, 167, 167t, 168, 169 reperfusion injury after, 64, 68, 111
Protein S deficiency, 166, 166t, 167t, 168, 169 in wake-up stroke, 75, 76c, 76f
Prothrombin G20210A mutation, 166, 166t, 167, Recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rtPA),
168, 169 62, 64Y69, 68c, 79rY81r
Proton pump inhibitors, 247 in CADASIL, 220
Pseudobulbar affect, in CADASIL, 217 contraindications to, 43, 64, 66tY67t
Pulmonary embolism CT evaluation for, 41t, 61t, 64, 67t, 68, 68c,
after stroke, 86, 99, 100, 108r 74f, 263
unruptured aneurysm and anticoagulation for, decision to use, 52c
191Y192 determining eligibility for, 43, 64
CT findings, 47c
laboratory data, 44
Q NIHSS and, 44, 64, 65f, 67t, 68c, 75, 77
Quality monitoring for telestroke, 264, 265t dose and administration of, 65
guidelines for use of, 41tY42t
indications for, 64, 66t
R intracerebral hemorrhage after, 65, 68, 79r, 94,
R506Q gene, 166, 166t, 167t, 168, 169 94Y97, 95f
Race/ethnicity hemorrhagic transformation subtypes, 94, 96t
hypertension and, 18 risk factors for, 68, 95
moyamoya disease and, 223 treatment of, 68, 94, 96c
stroke risk and, 16, 17, 35rY36r limitations of, 68Y69
lipoprotein (a) elevation, 33 mechanical thrombectomy and, 72cY73c
Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing the Efficacy meta-analysis of trials of, 65f
of Percutaneous Closure of Patent Foramen orolingual angioedema after, 68, 93Y94, 106r
Ovale (PFO) With Medical Treatment in Patients for patients with minor and rapidly improving
With Cryptogenic Embolism (PC-Trial), 127 deficits, 75, 77
Randomized Evaluation of Long-Term Anticoagulant for posterior circulation strokes, 77
Therapy With Dabigatran Etexilate (RE-LY) trial, premixing of, 41t, 47c
118, 131r rapid access to and administration of, 41t, 47c
Randomized Evaluation of Recurrent Stroke sudden neurologic decline during infusion of, 68
Comparing PFO Closure to Established Current telestroke administration, in mobile stroke
Standard of Care Treatment (RESPECT), 127 unit, 77
Randomized Trial of Revascularization With telestroke decision to use, 260, 260c, 263Y264
Solitaire FR Device Versus Best Medical therapeutic window for, 64Y65, 68c, 74f, 77
Therapy in the Treatment of Acute Stroke Due use in children, 64, 171
to Anterior Circulation Large Vessel Occlusion use in older adults, 64, 65
Presenting Within 8 Hours of Symptom Onset use in patients taking anticoagulants, 75
(REVASCAT), 71t use in pregnancy, 67t, 211, 230, 230c
A Randomized Trial of Unruptured Brain for wake-up stroke, 75
Arteriovenous Malformations (ARUBA), 195Y196 Recurrent artery of Heubner, 52
Ranitidine Recurrent stroke. See Stroke recurrence
effect on poststroke recovery, 247 REGARDS (REasons for Geographic and Racial
for orolingual angioedema, 68, 94 Differences in Stroke) study, 16, 27, 35r