Principle of Management Case Chapter 6
Principle of Management Case Chapter 6
Principle of Management Case Chapter 6
Question 6 – 20: What role did Lehman’s executives play in the company’s
collapse? Were they being responsible and ethical? Discuss.
- They were very stubborn, and displayed very bad conduct and poor judgment.
Valuka’s report was highly critical of Lehman’s executives who should have
done more, done better. He pointed out that the executives made the
company’s problem worse by their conduct, which ranged from “serious but
nonculpable errors of business judgment to actionable balance sheet
manipulation.
Question 6 – 21: could anything have been done differently at Lehman Brothers
to prevent what happened? Explain.
- There are many things that could have done to prevent it. If there were top
managers that actually cared about the company beside than themselves.
Building a better,proper culture and reward structure.
Question 6 – 22: after all the public uproar over Enron and then the passage of
the Sarbanes Oxley Act to protect shareholders, why do you think we still
continue to see these types of situations? Is it unreasonable to expect that
business can and should act ethically?
- No. Many companies promote positive working environments. The company’s
responsibility is to promote and act ethically enabling employees to follow
suit. Managers need to create and encourage a culture where bad news are
heard and acted on before it’s too late. If the company focuses on ethical
leadership, the company will be ethical and profitable.