An Overview of the Agricultural

Sector in India

Jomon Mathew “The impact of new economic policy on Indian agriculture: A

study of selected cash crops ” Thesis. Department of Economics, Dr. John
Matthai Centre , University of Calicut, 2006
3 An Overview ofthe Agricultural Sector in India

3.1. Introduction

3.2. Place of agriculture in the national economy

3.3. Agricultural growth since 1950-51

3.4. Capitalformation in Indian agriculture

3.5. Foreign trade of agricultural commodities

3.6. Agricultural sector under the New Economic Policy

3.7. Bound rates of plantatiodcash crops

3.8. Concluding remarks

 Chapter 3

AN OVERVIEW OF THE AGRICULTURAL SECTOR IN INDIA

3.1 Introduction

Agriculture continues to be the mainstay of the Indian economy. Agriculture

is described as the backbone of Indian economy mainly because of the three reasons.

One, agriculture constitutes large share of country's national income though the

share has declined from 55 percent in early 1950s to about 25 percent in early 2000s.

Two, more than 213rd of workforce of the country were employed in agricultural

sector until 1971. Recent census data for the year 2001 indicates that agriculture

workers (cultivators and agricultural labourers) account for 58.4 percent of

workforce of India. Three, growth of other sectors and overall economy depends on

the performance of agriculture to a considerable extent. Agriculture has also played

important role as foreign exchange earner. Because of its backward and forward

linkages with other economic sectors, changes in agricultural performance have a

multiplier effect on the entire economy. Its performance, therefore, is crucial in the

task of reduction and eventual elimination of poverty in India.

This chapter gives an overview of the agricultural sector in India. It also

reviews policies and initiatives in agricultural sector in the light of the New

Economic Policy and the WTO Agreement on Agriculture.

3.2 Place of agriculture in the national economy

National Income statistics provide a wide view of the country's entire

economy, as well as of the various groups of the population who participate as

producers and income receivers , and that , if available over a substantial period ,
they reveal the basic changes in the country's economy in the past and suggest, if

not fully reveal, trends for the future. (National Income Committee, 1951)'. The

composition and structure of India's National Income have been changing during the

plan period. The contribution of the primary sector in national income, export

earning and employment are well summarized in the table given below.

Table 3.1
Share of agriculture in national income, employment and trade

Per cent share in economy

Year GDP Export Employment

Source: EPW Research Foundation (2002)' National Accounts Statistics of

India (1950- 51 to 2000-01)

Note: Agricultural GDP includes fishery and forestry. Agricultural exports

do not include forestry.

The percentage share of agricultural sector in national income was 57.7

during 1950-51. This share has declined to 24.6 percent during early 2000s. The

2001 census data indicates that agriculture workers account for 58.4 percent of

workforce of India. Agriculture also plays an important role as foreign exchange

earner. Agricultural exports accounted for 44.3 per cent of India's total merchandise
exports during 1960-61. The share has declined over time but agriculture still

contributes more than 17 percent of export earnings of India (Table 3.1).

3.3 Agricultural growth since 1950-51

India has made a lot of progress in agriculture since independence in terms

of growth in output, yields and area under many crops. It has gone through a green

revolution, a white revolution, a yellow revolution and a blue revolution. Today,

India is the largest producer of milk, fruits, cashew nuts, coconuts and tea in the

world, the second largest producer of wheat, vegetables, sugar and fish and the third

largest producer of tobacco and rice.

Performance of agriculture on production front can be seen from the growth

rates presented in table 3.2. The table shows the growth rates for agriculture and

allied sectors that include crop, livestock and fishery sub sectors. Separate estimates

for GDP of crop sector and livestock sector are not available, because, due to

dominance of mixed crop plus livestock farming system, it is considered impossible

to distinguish between inputs used in crop activity and livestock activity. However,

separate estimates for value of output of these two activities are available.

Among the three sub sectors, output of fishery has grown at the highest rate

during all the five decades since 1950-51. In the last three decades, output of

livestock sector has been growing at a faster rate compared to crop sector. Growth

rates in different sub sectors of agriculture indicate that Indian agriculture is

diversifying towards livestock and fishery products away fiom crop products.

Outputs of crop sector showed best growth during the period fiom 1980-81 to 1990-

91.
 Table 3.2
Average of annual growth rates in GDP and output of agriculture and its sub sectors
at 1993-94 prices (%)

Period Agriculture Agricult Fishery Crops Live Fruits and Other

and allied ure stock vegetables crops
activities

1951-52t0 3.12 3.41 5.49 3.58 1.52 0.72 4.04

1960-61

1960-61to 2.92 2.97 3.91 3.29 0.93 6.53 2.79

1970-71

1970-71t0 2.3 1 2.59 2.82 2.94 3.73 4.39 2.73

1980-81

1980-81 4.40 4.72 5.57 4.73 4.71 3.65 5.03

to 1990-91

1990-91to 2.72 2.75 5.01 2.29 3.78 5.54 1.47

2000-0 1

Source: EPW Research Foundation (2002), NationaI Accounts Statistics of India

(1950-51 to 2000-01)

Figure 3.1
Growth of agricultural sector since 1950-51
5-
4.5 -
4 -
3.5 -
S
.5 3-
B
E 2.5 -
3 2-
1.5 -.

0J
1951-61 1961-71 1971-81 1981-91 1991-01
time period

Accounts Statistics of India (1950- 51 to 2000-01)

 Growth rates of overall agriculture and all the sub sectors except fruits and

vegetables received setback after 1990-91(Chand 2004)~.The deceleration in growth

rate appeared in the initial years of reforms and it deteriorated further in the post

WTO period. In the case horticultural sector (fruits and vegetables), output growth

rate increased from 3.65 percent during the decade before reforms to more than 5.54

percent during the reforms (EPW, 2002)~.It is worth noting that after 1991-92

output of horticultural sector increased annually by about 6 percent that is more than

double the growth rate in output of non-horticulture crops. Output of non-

horticulture crops has recorded lowest growth after 1990-91 in the post

independence period.

3.4 Capital formation in Indian agriculture

Investment is one of the crucial factors determining the growth rate of

agricultural sector. The government plays a very significant role in boosting

agricultural growth through its increased investment in this field as also inducing the

private investment in agriculture. The figures published by the Government in the

economic survey reveal the mutual role of the two parties. Though the overall growth

of the Indian economy has depended much upon the performance of agriculture, over

the years, not much public investment has been made on its development. There is a

steady deceleration in public investment in gross capital formation in agriculture. At

the same time, private investment has been increasing over the years. During 1960-61,

the total investment in the agricultural sector was 1670 crores of which the public

sector contributed 590 crores and the public sector, 1070 crores. However, during

1980-81, the total investment increased to 4640 with 2840 and 1800 crores by the

private and the public sectors respectively (Economic Survey, 1998-99)'

 However, during the 1990s the capital formation in agriculture as percentage

of GDP declined as shown in table 3.3. The investment in agriculture as percentage of

GDP declined from 1.6 per cent in 1993-94 to 1.3 per cent in the subsequent years i.e.,

during early 2000s. This declining trend was mainly due to near stagnation or fall of

public investment in agriculture since the early nineties. The year 2001-02 is likely to

be a turning point as public investment in agriculture has touched Rs. 4794 crores,

which was significantly higher than that of the previous five years. If this trend were

maintained, then it would be an indication of some success resulting from the

Government's recent efforts in diverting higher flow of resources to agriculture.

Table 3.3

Gross capital formation in agriculture at 1993-94 prices (Rupees in crores)

% Investment in
Total Private Public % share
Year investment investment investment (private) (public) agriculture as
percent of GDP
1993-94 13523 9056 4467 67.0 33.0 1.6
1994-95 14969 10022 4947 67.0 33.0 1.6
1995-96 15690 10841 4849 69.1 30.9 1.6
1996-97 16176 11508 4668 71.1 28.9 1.5
1997-98 15942 11963 3979 75.0 25.0 1.4
1998-99 14895 11025 3870 74.0 26.0 1.3
1999-00 17304 13082 4222 75.6 24.4 1.4
2000-01 16687 12768 3919 76.5 23,5 1.3
2001-02 18057 13263 4794 73.5 26.5 1.3
Source: Central Statistical Organization.

3.5 Foreign trade of agricultural commodities

Foreign trade plays a crucial role in the economic development of a country

that the underdeveloped countries have launched on a massive scale especially after

Second World War. For a country of its size, India is a minor participant in world
trade. At present, India accounts for less than 1 per cent of overall world exports and

imports (Mattoo and ~ubramanian2003)~.

Subsequent to the economic reforms initiated in 1991, removing the

restrictions and protective licensing regime, free trade in a large number of items has

become the order of the day. With the removal of Quantitative Restrictions on

agricultural items and urea, the Indian farmer community has been placed to face

stiff competition from the developed nations.

Figure 3.2

India's share in global agricultural trade (%)

Fig. 3: India's share in global agriculture trade (Yo)

1.20
1.15
1.10

j ::;
0.95
0.90
S 0.85
0.80
0.75
0.70
1991- 1992- 1993- 1994- 1995- 1996- 1997- 1998- 1999- 2000-
92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01

Source: Ramesh Chand, "India's Agricultural Trade Policies and its stand in
the Doha Round of WTO Negotiations", National Centre for Agricultural
economics and Policy Research, New Delhi

Ramesh chand6 gives a picture of india's share in global trade in the ten

year period since 1991-92 (see figure 3.2). Until1 1995-96, India's share was less

than one per cent of the global agricultural trade. However, with the introduction of

AoA, our participation in the trade improved and the share gone up to 1.15 % during

1996-97, thereby maintaining the position above one per cent in the succeding years.
3.5.1 Agricultural Exports

Exports from India are broadly classified into several categories like agriculture

and allied products, oils and minerals, manufactured goods, mineral fuel etc. Among

them, agriculture and allied products occupied significant place in the total export

earning of the country. Agriculture and allied products alone contributed 31.7 per

cent of the total export earning of India in 1970-71, which fell down to 30.6 per cent

in 1980-81 (Ruddar Datt and K P M ~undhararn)'

Table 3.4

Export Value of Agricultural Commodities in Total National Exports

(Rupees in crores)

% of agricultural
Agricultural Total national
Year exports to total
exports export
national exports
1990-91 6012.76 35527.28 18.49
1991-92 7838.13 44041.81 17.80
1992-93 9040.30 53688.26 16.84
1993-94 12586.55 69748.85 18.05
1994-95 13222.76 82673.40 15.99
1995-96 20397.74 106353.35 19.18
1996-97 24161.29 118817.32 20.33
1997-98 24843.45 130100.64 19.10
1998-99 25510.64 139751.77 18.25
1999-00 25313.64 159095.20 15.91
2000-0 1 28909.30 202509.76 14.28
200 1-02 16254.29 115762.05 14.04
2002-03 NA NA 13.58
2003-04 NA NA 12.62
Source: website, http://www.agriculture-industry-india
 India has been a consistent but small net exporter of agricultural products

since 1980. The major devaluation of the Indian rupee that followed the balance of

payment crisis in 1991 has had a much greater impact on the value of exports of

clothing, textiles and other manufactured goods than on exports from the agricultural

sector. The share of agricultural exports in total Indian exports has been declining in

recent years. In 2003-04, agricultural products made-up around 12 per cent of the

total value of Indian exports compared with 18 per cent in 1990-91. No one

agricultural product dominated export trade.

Table 3.4 shows the contribution of agricultural sector in total national

exports from 1990-91 to 2003-2004. Agricultural share fluctuated during the

reference period and registered the highest value during 1996-97 i.e., 20.33%. It

started declining further from 1996-97 onwards thereby showing 12.62 % during

2003-04~.The declining trend in the relative share of agriculture is primarily due to

increased non-agricultural exports from the country and hence agricultural sector

plays major role in earning a good sum of foreign exchange.

3.5.2 Agricultural imports

Import of agricultural as well as non- agricultural commodities registered

sharp increase in the recent past. Data given in table 3.5 show the trend of India's

total as well as agricultural imports since 1990-91. Regarding the percentage share

of agriculture in the total imports, the share was too narrow in the early 1990's; say

2.79% in 1990-91 and 3 -09 % in 1991-92. However, the share increased to 6.6 in

1994-95 and thereafter after a slight slop in the share for the next three financial

years, it recorded the highest share of 8.17 % during 1998-99 for the first time in the

decade.
 During 2001-02, agricultural commodity imports were valued at $2.3 billion,

two-third of which was accounted for by a single commodity, namely edible oil. In

recent years, edible oil accounting for nearly 60 to 65 per cent of the value of total

agricultural imports has become the single largest import item. Raw cashew nuts,

nuts (almonds from USA) and pulses are among the other dominant agricultural

imports, each of which accounts for nearly 5 to 10 per cent of the total agricultural

imports in recent years. There was a substantial increase in the import of pulses

during 2001-02 with its share in the total agricultural imports rising by over 28 per

cent. Agricultural imports in 2003-04 constituted only a small proportion (6.19 per

cent) of the country's total imports.

Table 3.5
Import value of Agricultural Commodities in Total National imports
(Rupees in crores)
% Agricultural Imports
Year Agricultural Imports Total National Imports
to Total National Imports
1990-91 1205.86 43 170.82 2.79
1991-92 1478.27 47850.84 3.09
1992-93 2876.25 63374.52 4.54
1993-94 2327.33 73101.01 3.18
1994-95 5937.21 89970.70 6.60
1995-96 5890.10 122678.14 4.80
1996-97 6612.60 138919.88 4.76
1997-98 8784.19 154176.29 5.70
1998-99 14566.48 178331.69 8.17
1999-00 16066.73 215528.53 7.45
2000-0 1 12030.36 226773.47 5.3 1
200 1-02 9311.55 141989.68 6.56
2002-03 NA NA 5.92
2003-04 NA NA 6.19

Source: http://www.agriculture_industry-india
 b .
A f b ~ poky. h ~

caseo of^,^^^^^^^
( t h C e x c 1 ~ ~ p o r t i n p o f ~ ~
~ ~ m & h i @ ~ ~ ~ f ~ S s l , ~ B s t
~ ~ i m p o r t ~ ~ ~ t h
somaf0rmof~~ela~ononlmpom(~~tr2001)'~~1~101~~(
~ 9 3 l p e t ~ € u f W e l o c a t ~ ~ b a h c e s f
1991 d a reassessment of trade policy. Tke exchnp rate was devdmd,
~ ~ 0 n ~ W w s d ~ ~ i w r
- e m d H ~ ~ , t b e ~ i n M w l t t e
qumtitatiw import lmhchom
f ~ w e d o n ~ ~
i g a o r a d . Z t w a a w 5 t h ~ ~ e n t u f W o ~ ~ T t r a d a ~ (m
1995 and the implementation of the Uruguay Round Agreement on Agriculture

(AoA) that major reforms were introduced in the agricultural sector.

3.6.1 Agreement on Agriculture (AoA)

The liberalization process in the agricultural sector had to wait until the

formation of the WTO to gather momentum. The GATT was a failure in promoting

free trade in agricultural products (Bernad and Michel, 1995)". Agricultural trade

was practically kept out of free trade regime until the formation of WTO. The AoA

necessitated far reaching measures of liberalization in Indian agriculture. The inward

oriented policies were systematically replaced by outward oriented policies.

The AoA establishes a number of generally applicable rules with regard to

trade-related measures, primarily in the areas of market access, domestic support

and export subsidies. These rules relate to country specific commitments to improve

market access and reduce trade-distorting subsidies. The reduction commitments

under AoA are presented in the table given below.

Table 3.6
Reduction commitments under AOA
Developing Developed
Item Counties (%)
Countries (%)
Tariffs:
Average cut for all agricultural
products 24 36
Minimum cut per product 10 15
Domestic support:
(Base period: 1986-1988)
AMS 13 20
Exports subsidy:
(Base period: 1986-1990)
Subsidy outlays 24 36
Subsidized quantities 14 21
Implementation period for
All commitments 1995-2004 1995-2000
Source: WTO, 200 1
3.6.1.1 Market access

Under market access commitments in the AoA, member countries were

required to replace all types of non-tariff barriers with tariffs, and to reduce tariff

levels under a time-bound program. In addition to these commitments, this measure

also called for maintaining current access opportunities and establishing minimum

access tariff quotas. For countries such as India, where Quantitative Restrictions

(QRs) covered all agricultural imports for Balance of Payment (BoP) reasons, only

ceiling bindings had to be submitted. For these ceiling bindings, there was no upper

limit, provided the tariffs had not been bound in earlier rounds of negotiations.

The process of tariffication of non-tariff barriers was a central element of the

Uruguay Round Agreement on Agriculture. Under this agreement, non-tariff

measures were to be converted to tariff equivalents. Developing countries were

given the flexibility to offer 'ceiling bindings' (agreed maximum Tariffs) on

products that were subject to previously unbound tariffs or subject to some form of

qualitative restriction. These ceiling bindings could be higher than the September

1986 applied tariffs (the rate at which developing countries were required to limit

tariffs under the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade then in place). In addition,

there was no obligation to reduce these ceiling bindings during the implementation

period (FAO, 2003)"

3.6.1.2 Domestic support

Countries use a number of policy instruments such as support prices and input

subsidies, which affect incentives that farmers receive in terms of prices and hence

influence resource allocation. In the AoA, the impact of price support and related

policies is captured through the AMS. India has a product price support system in
-.
the form of minimum support prices announced by the government for different

commodities, based on the recommendations of the Commission for Agricultural

Costs and Prices. Our analysis shows that for 18 major commodities, the product-

specific support, as defined under the AoA during the base period, was (-) US$18.11

billion (Table 3.7). As a percentage of the value of agricultural output (crop sector),

the product-specific AMS is (-) 26.1 percent during this period. During 1995-96, the

estimated product specific AMS turned out to be (-) 34.36 percent of the value of

agricultural output, and during 2000-2001, the same was estimated to be (-) 28.6

percent of the value of agricultural output.

The non-product-specific support, which includes subsidies on irrigation,

fertilizers, electricity, credit and seeds, was about 1.25 percent of the value of

agricultural output during the base period. During 1995-1996, the non-product-

specific support was roughly 1.88 percent of the value of agricultural output, which

was worked out to be about 2.32 percent of the value of agricultural output during

2000-01.
Table 3.7
Domestic support to Indian agriculture
Period Product As a percentage of Non-product As a percentage
specific the value of output specific of the value of
support of the agricultural support (US$ output of the
(US$ sector billion agricultural
billion) sector
(1986-87 -18.1 1 -26.10 0.87 1.25
t01988-89)
1995-96 -26.37 -34.36 1.44 1.88
1996-97 -27.67 -32.44 1.58 1.86
1997-98 -25.38 -29.52 1.84 2.14
1998-99 -27.75 -30.13 1.86 2.02
1999-00 -25.50 -27.24 2.07 2.21
2000-01 -26.00 -28.58 2.1 1 2.32
Source: WTO, 2001b
 The negative product specific support to Indian agriculture shows that various

controls on domestic as well external trade have kept domestic prices of major crops

below world prices. In the case of domestic trade, these controls included

restrictions on the movement of agricultural commodities, compulsory procurement

levies, licensing and stocking requirements and credit controls. The controls on

external trade comprised export prohibitions, quantitative restrictions, minimum

export prices and canalization. The net result of these policies has been that the

negative product specific support outweighs the positive non-product specific

support.

3.6.1.3 Export competition

Export subsidies included in reduction commitments are direct subsidies paid

by the government or any other agency, including payments in kind; payments that

are made from the proceeds of levy imposed on agricultural products; subsidies that

are given to reduce the cost of marketing including internal handling, processing,

international transport and freight subsidy on export shipments.

As India does not have a system of direct export subsidies, it was not bound to

make any reduction commitment on export subsidies. A few benefits were available

to the exporters of agricultural commodities through income tax exemptions under

section 80 - HHC of the Income Tax Act (1961) on profits from export sales. In
2000, the government decided to phase out these benefits over a period of five years

starting from 2000-2001, making profits taxable by 2004-2005.

As the agreement allows developing member countries to subsidize costs of

marketing agricultural products including handling, upgrading and other processing

costs and the costs of domestic and international transport and freight, India is
making use of these provisions. The schemes facilitate mainly the exports of

horticultural items and are operated by the Agricultural and Processed Food

Products Export Development Authority (APEDA). Because the exports of many

agricultural items have been adversely hit owing to the fall in commodity prices and

aggressive subsidization by those members that are allowed to subsidize their

exports, the government is thinking of extending these subsidies, which are

permissible under the agreement, to other agricultural products as well. Though

there is no commitment by India on export subsidies, there are restrictions on

introducing direct export subsidies in the kture that are not compatible with the

agreement.

3.7 Bound rates of plantation 1 cash crops

Cash crops are high value crops of great economic importance and provide

huge employment opportunities, the important among them being tea, sugar, coffee,

rubber and tobacco. In recent times, cash crops have even facilitated the external

sector, especially export crops like tea and coffee. The policies relating to the cash

crops also underwent changes with the advent of the Agreement on Agriculture. A

major factor causing changes in production, prices and trade is the commitment

concerning the bound rates.

India is among the biggest producers, consumers and suppliers of tea in the

world. However, even tea has been under-performing. Tea production in India

peaked in 1998 and has been on the decline ever since. In fact, tea production

declined by 5.9% in 2005. Natural rubber also did well in terms of production.

Increases in production are despite the lifting of quantitative restrictions on natural

rubber imports since April 1, 2001. Globally, rubber prices have hit the roof. They

jumped 123% in 2005, indicative of the growing demand1*.

Table 3.8
Bound and applied duty rates of different plantation / cash crops in India
Item Base rate* Bound Basic duty in
Rate (%) 2000-0 1Budget (%)

Raw coffee 140 100 70

Roasted coffee 140 150 70
Tea 140 150 70
Mate 140 100 35
Vanilla Rs.60/Kg+40 100 35
Clove 140 100 35
Nutmeg 140 100 35
Cardamom 140 100 35
Ginger 140 150 35
Turmeric 140 150 35
Natural Rubber 85 25 25
TSR 85 25 25
Latex -- UB 35
Source: GATT (1994: V/ Part I 127-29); Goyal(2000: 425-435); (2001: 412-417)

Note : * Base rate of duty is the duty prevailed on 1-9-1986 for all items except NR
and the duty prevailed on 1-1-1990 for NR (GATT, 1994: V/ Part I-I, Part
11-I), UB- Unbound, TSR- Technically Specified Rubber.

Table 3.8 presents a comparison of bound,rates committed by the GO1 for

different plantationlcash crops. Since all the items except natural rubber are

classified as agricultural products, the bound rates are 100 and 150 per cent for raw

and processed forms respectively. Therefore, operationally, the bound rates of dry

forms of natural rubber have been 29.4 per cent of the base duty compared to 107

per cent in the case of processed tea and coffee. Consequently, the flexibility drawn
from the higher bound rates was effectively used by enhancing the import duty rates

of tea and coffee in the Union Budget for 2000-2001. This is to ensure protection in

the context of the removal of Quantitative Restrictions on March 3 1, 2001 whereas

the existing import duty of 25 per cent for dry forms of NR could not be raised.

3.8 Concluding remarks

Agriculture continues to be the backbone of Indian economy by providing

livelihood for more than half of her total population. The primary sector of the

economy also acts as a significant contributor to GDP and foreign exchange. In

recent year, Indian agriculture has experienced profound changes. Changes

elsewhere in the economy will also continue to put pressure for changes in the

agricultural sector. A major change that took place in this sector is the globalization

of Indian agriculture.

The first tentative change to support arrangements was introduced following

India's implementation of the Uruguay Round Agreement on Agriculture (AoA),

which required India to revise its trade support policies. As a result, the strict

controls on trade in agricultural products were loosened with the virtual removal of

all quantitative restrictions. The replacement of these control measures with

relatively high tariffs has so far had little impact on trade or opened the domestic

market up to competition. Globalization of Indian agriculture offers both

opportunities and challenges to policy makers. Opportunities exist for deriving large

benefits through substantial increase in the agricultural exports, especially, high

value labor-intensive agricultural products. The challenges lie in modernizing small-

scale agriculture and making it efficient and competitive

 References:

1. Government of India (195 l), First Report of the National Income Committee, April 1951 ,
p.6

2. Chand Ramesh (2004), "Agriculture Growth during the Reforms and Liberalization: Issues
and Concerns, Policy Brief 2O", National Centre for Agricultural Economics and Policy
Research, New Delhi

3. EPW Research Foundation (2002), National Accounts Statistics of India (1950- 51 to

2000-01)

4. Economic Survey (1 998-99), p. 120; Economic Survey 200 1-02, p.202

5. Mattoo, A. and Subramanian, A. (2003), 'India and the multilateral trading system post-
Doha: defensive or proactive?' in Mattoo, A. and Stem, R.M. (Eds), India and the WTO,
World Bank and Oxford University Press.

6. Ramesh Chand, "India's Agricultural Trade Policies and its stand in the Doha Round of
WTO Negotiations", National Centre for Agricultural economics and Policy Research, New
Delhi.

7. Ruddar Datt and K P M Sundharam (2003), "Indian Economy", forty Eighth Revised
Edition, S Chand & Company Ltd., New Delhi, p. 514

8. Web site: http://www.agricultureeindustry-india

9. Chadra, R. (2001), 'Trade and balance of payments' in Economic and Policy Reforms in
India, National Council of Applied Economic Research, New Delhi, pp. 89-128.

10. Bernard H and K Michel (1995), "The Political Economy of the World Trading System:
From GATT to WTO", Oxford Press, Oxford

11. FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations) (2003), "ET0Agreement
on Agriculture: The Implementation Experience- Developing Country Case Studies", Rome,
2004, FAOSTAT database, Rome (http://faostat.fao.org).

12. "Meter's down for cash crops", Times News Network, March 3,