Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis For Identifying of Groundwater Potential Sites in Haridwar, India
Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis For Identifying of Groundwater Potential Sites in Haridwar, India
Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis For Identifying of Groundwater Potential Sites in Haridwar, India
Landsat 8 OLI 14 44 30 9
B7
Table 2.Description of Satellite Landsat 8 2.10
In the present study of AHP is used to consistency index has failed to reach a
determine the site suitability. AHP is multi required level then answers to comparisons
criteria.
Landsat 8 image has been aquired from
USGS Glovis online portal, which has been
used for preparation several thematic layer.
Another data of Cartosat has been aquired
from BHUVAN online portal.
In order to generate LULC Map supervised
classification method is adopted using
Maximum Likelihood classifier using
ERDAS software. DEM data has been
captured from CARTOSAT satellite. Slope,
Aspect and Elevation are developed using
DEM data in Arc GIS software. The soil
Fig.3. Model used in present study
layer is developed by georefrencing soil
Table 3.Ranking for different Parameters
map of India obtained from the National
in Site Suitability Zone Mapping
Bureau of Soil Survey and Land Use
Compare Weight Sub-criteria
criteria Planning (NBSS & LUP). Softwares like
ArcGIS and ERDAS have been used for elevation of area. ArcGIS has many built in
editing, digitization and topology criteria. features which can convert elevation map
Then combining all these raster layers final into derivative map. Figure 4 represents the
model is prepared as shown in Figure 3 in elevation map of study area. The elevation
ArcGIS map is devided into 10 classes as depicted
The next step is to assign weights value to in figure.
each raster layer (based on expert person
judgement) as shown in Table 3. Then these
steps are applied in AHP for pair wise
comparision matrix, Normalized Matrix
etc. AHP is a structured technique for
organising and analysing complex decision
making problem based on psychological
and mathematical method which was
developed by Thomas L. Saaty in 1970
AHP model used in study which was made
in ArcGIS and finally the site suitability
map is generated by using these parameters.
ERDAS Imagine software. Maximum of an area are important as they decides the
likelihood algorithm is one of the most run off and groundwater recharge level of
widely used algoritthm of supervised that area. Thus drainage density of this area
image data. Land use land cover is the most easily locate the area with high density. The
significant method depicts the urban places nearer to these sites have high
most of the conditions it is used to find the factor is of high importance settlement in
open land, vegetation land, urban cover any area.Figure 7 shows the drainage
Soil Layer
Geology Map
Geology map is prepared using visual The soil map of the study area was obtained
interpretation of satellite image with the aid from the National Bureau of Soil Survey
of Geological Survey of India (GSI) map. and Land Use Planning and converted into
In the present study area, four types of digital format. The soil map was updated
geology namely; Damtha group, Berinag with the Landsat TM image. The soils for
group, Bajinath group and Ramgarh the study area reveal five main soil
formation are present, as shown in Figure 8. categories, namely; Typic Urdorthents,
Udic Haplustepts, Typic Haplustepts and
Udifluventic Haplustepts as described in
Figure 9.
Fig. 10: Depth of water table
Fig. 9: Soil Map
Lineament Density Layer
Depth to Water Table Layer
Lineament density layer informs about the
Depth to water table layer of pre-monsoon movement and storage surface run off water
and post-monsoon season has been which makes it important for the study. The
prepared using IDW interpolation area is divided into five classes from 0 -
technique. The depth to water table is 7.54 indicating a density near the each
divided into two zones: at 5 meter depth and lineament layer. The Figure 11 depicts the
10 m depth. In both pre-monsoon and post- lineament density map of our study area.
monsoon seasons major part of the study
area have 5 to 10 m depth to water table as
shown in Figure 10.
Fig. 11: Lineament Density Map Fig.12. Groundwater Potential Map
future development.
After applying weights to develop raster
Suitability map = ∑(Criteria map x weight)
layer final map for potential site for future
Suitability index = {[Lineament x (0.12)] +
urban development is developed as shown
[Geology x (0.03)] + [Drainage density x
in Fig.12 and the total area is divided into
(0.11)] + [Slope x (0.09)] + [Elevation x
five classes as displayed in Table 4.
(0.12)] + [LULC x (0.07)] + [Water table x
(0.19)] + [Soil x (0.11)]}.
Conclusion
This study is focused on selection of sites as
most suitable, moderately suitable, suitable,
less suitable and permanently not suitable psychology. Volume 15, Issue 3, PP
land for groundwater potential. AHP matrix 234-281
along with GIS is used to analyses of 2. Chowdhury, A., Jha, M. K.,
different criteria considered for Chowdary, V. M., & Mal, B. C.
groundwater suitability. AHP along with (2009). Integrated remote sensing
GIS was found to be very useful for and GIS‐based approach for
groundwater suitability identification. The assessing groundwater potential in
result is adopted for decision making West Medinipur district, West
process for site suitability analysis of an Bengal, India. International Journal
area. The study includes physical of Remote Sensing, 30(1), 231-250.
parameters for expansion and need to 3. Kaliraj, S., Chandrasekar, N., &
include social and economic parameters. Magesh, N. S. (2014). Identification
Decision support system has been preferred of potential groundwater recharge
to identify appropriate site for best location zones in Vaigai upper basin, Tamil
for living in Haridwar city. To determine Nadu, using GIS-based analytical
site suitability for Haridwar city mainly hierarchical process (AHP)
three steps are followed: technique. Arabian Journal of
1. To determine best suitable site in Geosciences, 7(4), 1385-1401.
city for groundwater potential. 4. Prashant K. Srivastava, Dawei
2. Survey of city in Study area. Han, Manika Gupta, Saumitra
3. Analytical Hierarchy Process Mukherjee. (2012) Integrated
(AHP). framework for monitoring