Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 273 views

    Function Machine Rubric

    Uploaded by

    Marvin
    The document outlines criteria and ratings for evaluating a function machine project. It rates creativity/attractiveness, neatness, accuracy of content, and whether the project was completed on time. For each criteria, it provides descriptions of what constitutes a poor, fair, good, or excellent rating. Students would be evaluated based on these criteria and receive a total score.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Function Machine Rubric

    Uploaded by

    Marvin
    273 views3 pages
    The document outlines criteria and ratings for evaluating a function machine project. It rates creativity/attractiveness, neatness, accuracy of content, and whether the project was completed on time. For each criteria, it provides descriptions of what constitutes a poor, fair, good, or excellent rating. Students would be evaluated based on these criteria and receive a total score.

    Original Description:

    RUBRIC

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    The document outlines criteria and ratings for evaluating a function machine project. It rates creativity/attractiveness, neatness, accuracy of content, and whether the project was completed on time. For each criteria, it provides descriptions of what constitutes a poor, fair, good, or excellent rating. Students would be evaluated based on these criteria and receive a total score.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf or txt
    273 views3 pages

    Function Machine Rubric

    Uploaded by

    Marvin
    The document outlines criteria and ratings for evaluating a function machine project. It rates creativity/attractiveness, neatness, accuracy of content, and whether the project was completed on time. For each criteria, it provides descriptions of what constitutes a poor, fair, good, or excellent rating. Students would be evaluated based on these criteria and receive a total score.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf or txt
    of 3

    FUNCTION MACHINE Rating

    Poor Fair Good Excellent


    CRITERIA 1 pts 2 pts 3 pts 4 pts

    Creativity/Attractiveness Poor Fair Good Excellent

    Minimum effort was The model is complete, The model is neat The model is neat and
    exerted when but it is not neat. and visually visually pleasing.
    completing the pleasing. Clearly, maximum effort
    project. It is not neat. was exerted when
    It is not complete completing the project.

    Neatness Poor Fair Good Excellent

    Handwriting was Handwriting was Good Handwriting Handwriting and


    somewhat readable. readable. coloring were
    exceptional.

    Accuracy of Content Poor Fair Good Excellent

    Completed some of Completed at least Completed most of Completed all of the


    the function machine one function machine the function machine function machine
    problems correctly problem correctly and problems and made problems correctly and
    and began the was able to make up a up a function made up a unction
    process of making up function machine. machine. machine problem.
    a function machine.

    Project completed on time Poor Fair Good Excellent

    Project is 2 days late Project is 1 day Project is completed on


    late time

    TOTAL

    FUNCTION MACHINE Rating


    Poor Fair Good Excellent
    CRITERIA 1 pts 2 pts 3 pts 4 pts

    Creativity/Attractiveness Poor Fair Good Excellent

    Minimum effort was The model is complete, The model is neat The model is neat and
    exerted when but it is not neat. and visually visually pleasing.
    completing the pleasing. Clearly, maximum effort
    project. It is not neat. was exerted when
    It is not complete completing the project.

    Neatness Poor Fair Good Excellent

    Handwriting was Handwriting was Good Handwriting Handwriting and


    somewhat readable. readable. coloring were
    exceptional.

    Accuracy of Content Poor Fair Good Excellent

    Completed some of Completed at least Completed most of Completed all of the


    the function machine one function machine the function machine function machine
    problems correctly problem correctly and problems and made problems correctly and
    and began the was able to make up a up a function made up a unction
    process of making up function machine. machine. machine problem.
    a function machine.

    Project completed on time Poor Fair Good Excellent

    Project is 2 days late Project is 1 day Project is completed on


    late time

    TOTAL
    FUNCTION MACHINE Rating
    Poor Fair Good Excellent
    CRITERIA 1 pts 2 pts 3 pts 4 pts

    Creativity/Attractiveness Poor Fair Good Excellent

    Minimum effort was The model is complete, The model is neat The model is neat and
    exerted when but it is not neat. and visually visually pleasing.
    completing the pleasing. Clearly, maximum effort
    project. It is not neat. was exerted when
    It is not complete completing the project.

    Neatness Poor Fair Good Excellent

    Handwriting was Handwriting was Good Handwriting Handwriting and


    somewhat readable. readable. coloring were
    exceptional.

    Accuracy of Content Poor Fair Good Excellent

    Completed some of Completed at least Completed most of Completed all of the


    the function machine one function machine the function machine function machine
    problems correctly problem correctly and problems and made problems correctly and
    and began the was able to make up a up a function made up a unction
    process of making up function machine. machine. machine problem.
    a function machine.

    Project completed on time Poor Fair Good Excellent

    Project is 2 days late Project is 1 day Project is completed on


    late time

    TOTAL

    FUNCTION MACHINE Rating


    Poor Fair Good Excellent
    CRITERIA 1 pts 2 pts 3 pts 4 pts

    Creativity/Attractiveness Poor Fair Good Excellent

    Minimum effort was The model is complete, The model is neat The model is neat and
    exerted when but it is not neat. and visually visually pleasing.
    completing the pleasing. Clearly, maximum effort
    project. It is not neat. was exerted when
    It is not complete completing the project.

    Neatness Poor Fair Good Excellent

    Handwriting was Handwriting was Good Handwriting Handwriting and


    somewhat readable. readable. coloring were
    exceptional.

    Accuracy of Content Poor Fair Good Excellent

    Completed some of Completed at least Completed most of Completed all of the


    the function machine one function machine the function machine function machine
    problems correctly problem correctly and problems and made problems correctly and
    and began the was able to make up a up a function made up a unction
    process of making up function machine. machine. machine problem.
    a function machine.

    Project completed on time Poor Fair Good Excellent

    Project is 2 days late Project is 1 day Project is completed on


    late time

    TOTAL

    You might also like