MID-YEAR REVIEW FORM (MRF) for Teacher I-III

Name of Employee: CATLEAH B. ZAMORA Name of Rater: LINDA C. MAHOMOC, EDD

Position: T-I Position: ASST. PRINCIPAL II
Bureau/Center/Service/Division: DIVISION OF DAVAO DEL SUR Date of Review:
Rating Period: MAY 2019 – OCTOBER 2019

Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year

Weight Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Review
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Performance
per KRA Results
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
Basic 1. Content 1. Applied MAY 2019 22.5% 1. Classroom observation tool Quality 3
Education Knowledge knowledge of – (COT) rating sheet and/or
Services and content within OCTOBER inter-observer agreement
Pedagogy and across 2019 form about knowledge of
curriculum content within and across
teaching areas. curriculum teaching areas
2. Lesson plans/modified DLLs
developed highlighting
integration of content
knowledge within and across
subject areas
3. Instructional materials Efficiency 3
highlighting mastery of
content and its integration in
other subject areas
4. Performance tasks/test
material(s) highlighting
integration of content
knowledge within and across
subject areas
5. Others (Please specify and
provide annotations)

Timeliness
 Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year
Weight Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Review
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Performance
per KRA Results
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
Basic 2. Used a range MAY 2019 1. Classroom observation tool Quality 3
Education of teaching – (COT) rating sheet and/or
Services strategies that OCTOBER inter-observer agreement
enhance learner 2019 form about teaching
achievement in strategies that enhance
literacy and learner achievement in
numeracy skills. literacy and numeracy skills
2. Lesson plans/modified DLLs
used in teaching highlighting
learner-centered strategies
that promote literacy and/or
numeracy skills
3. Instructional materials
highlighting learner-centered Efficiency 3
strategies that promote
literacy and/or numeracy
skills
4. Performance tasks/test
material(s) used in teaching
5. Results of assessment used
in teaching
6. Others (Please specify and
provide annotations) Timeliness
Basic 3. Applied a MAY 2019 1. Classroom observation tool Quality
Education range of – (COT) rating sheet and/or
Services teaching OCTOBER inter-observer agreement
strategies to 2019 form about teaching
develop critical strategies to develop critical
3
and creative and creative thinking, as
thinking, as well well as other higher-order
as other higher- thinking skills
order thinking 2. Lesson plans/modified DLLs
skills. used in teaching highlighting
different teaching strategies
that develop critical and
creative thinking and/or
other HOTS
 Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year
Weight Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Review
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Performance
per KRA Results
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
3. Instructional materials Efficiency 3
highlighting different
teaching strategies that
develop critical and creative
thinking and/or other HOTS
4. Performance tasks/test
material(s) used in
demonstration teaching
5. Results of assessment used
in teaching
6. Others (Please specify and
provide annotations) Timeliness
Basic 2. Learning 4. Managed MAY 2019 22.5% 1. Classroom observation tool Quality 3
Education Environment classroom – (COT) rating sheet and/or
Services and Diversity structure to OCTOBER inter-observer agreement
of Learners engage 2019 form about managing
learners, classroom structure that
individually or in engages learners in various
groups, in activities
meaningful 2. Lesson plans/modified DLLs Efficiency 3
exploration, highlighting various
discovery and classroom management
hands-on strategies that engage
activities within learners in activities/tasks in
a range of different physical learning
physical environments
learning 3. Others (Please specify and
environments. provide annotations) Timeliness
Basic 5. Managed MAY 2019 Classroom observation tool Quality 3
Education learner behavior – (COT) rating sheet and/or inter-
Services constructively by OCTOBER observer agreement form about
applying positive 2019 teacher management of learner
and non-violent behavior using the following
discipline to strategies:
ensure learning- 1. Providing motivation
 Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year
Weight Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Review
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Performance
per KRA Results
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
focused 2. Praising the learners/Giving Efficiency 3
environments. positive feedback
3. Setting house
rules/guidelines
4. Ensuring learners’ active
participation
5. Allowing learners to express
their ideas/opinions
6. Giving equal opportunities
to learners
7. Encouraging learners to ask
questions
8. Others (Please specify and Timeliness
provide annotations)
Basic 6. Used MAY 2019 1. Classroom observation tool Quality 3
Education differentiated, – (COT) rating sheet and/or
Services developmentally OCTOBER inter-observer agreement
appropriate 2019 form about using
learning differentiated,
experiences to developmentally appropriate
address learning experiences
learners’ 2. Lesson plans/modified DLLs
gender, needs, developed highlighting
strengths, differentiation in content,
interests and product, process, learning Efficiency 3
experiences. environment or others
according to learners’
gender, needs, strengths,
interests and experiences
3. Instructional materials
developed highlighting
differentiation in content,
product, process, learning
environment or others
according to learners’
gender, needs, strengths,
interests and experiences
4. Others (Please specify and
Timeliness
provide annotations)
 Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year
Weight Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Review
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Performance
per KRA Results
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
Basic 3. Curriculum 7. Planned, MAY 2019 22.5% 1. Classroom observation tool Quality 3
Education and Planning managed and – (COT) rating sheet and/or
Services implemented OCTOBER inter-observer agreement
developmentally 2019 form about using
sequenced developmentally sequenced
teaching and teaching and learning
learning process
processes to 2. Lesson plans/modified DLLs
meet curriculum highlighting
requirements developmentally sequenced
and varied instruction that meet
teaching curriculum goals and varied Efficiency 3
contexts. teaching contexts
3. Instructional materials used
to implement
developmentally sequenced
teaching and learning
process to meet curriculum
requirements and varied
teaching contexts
4. Others (Please specify and
provide annotations)

Timeliness
8. Participated MAY 2019 1. Personal notes of teachers Quality 3
in collegial – on LACs/FGDs/meetings
discussions that OCTOBER with proof of attendance
use teacher and 2019 2. Minutes of LAC/FGD
learner sessions on use of teacher
 Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year
Weight Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Review
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Performance
per KRA Results
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
feedback to and learner feedback to Efficiency 3
enrich teaching enrich teaching practice with
practice. proof of attendance
3. Others (Please specify and
provide annotations)

Timeliness
Basic 9. Selected, MAY 2019 1. Classroom observation tool Quality 3
Education developed, – (COT) rating sheet and/or
Services organized and OCTOBER inter-observer agreement
used 2019 form about using appropriate
appropriate teaching and learning
teaching and resources, including ICT
learning Examples:
resources,  Activity sheets/task
including ICT, to sheets/work sheets Efficiency 3
address learning  PowerPoint presentations
goals.  Video clips
 Module
 SIMs-Strategic
Intervention Materials
 Others
2. Lesson plans/modified DLLs
with appropriate instructional
materials appended
3. Others (Please specify and Timeliness
provide annotations)
 Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year
Weight Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Review
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Performance
per KRA Results
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
Basic 4. 10. Designed, MAY 2019 22.5% 1. Classroom observation tool Quality 3
Education Assessment selected, – (COT) rating sheet and/or
Services and organized and OCTOBER inter-observer agreement
Reporting used diagnostic, 2019 form about using diagnostic,
formative and formative and summative
summative assessment strategies
assessment 2. Prepared lesson
strategies plans/modified DLLs
consistent with highlighting appropriate use
curriculum of formative assessment
requirements. strategies
3. Developed diagnostic tests:
(a) with TOS reviewed by
superior; (b) with sample
accomplished
questionnaire/answer
sheets
4. Developed summative tests:
(a) with TOS reviewed by
superior; (b) with sample
accomplished
questionnaire/answer
sheets
Efficiency 3
5. Developed performance
tasks: (a) with rubrics
reviewed by superior; (b)
with sample accomplished
rubrics
6. Others (Please specify and
provide annotations)

Timeliness
 Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year
Weight Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Review
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Performance
per KRA Results
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
Basic 11. Monitored MAY 2019 1. Compilation of a learner’s Quality 3
Education and evaluated – written work with summary
Services learner progress OCTOBER of results and with signature
and 2019 of parents
achievement
using learner 2. Formative/summative
attainment data. assessment tools with TOS Efficiency 3
and frequency of errors with
identified least mastered
skills

3. Class records/grading
sheets Timeliness 3
4. Lesson plans/modified DLLs
showing index of mastery

5. Others (Please specify and

provide annotations)

Basic 12. MAY 2019 1. At least 3 samples of Quality 3

Education Communicated – corrected test papers of the
Services promptly and OCTOBER same 3 learners in the same
clearly the 2019 learning area with parents’ or
learners’ needs, guardians’ signature and
progress and date of receipt
achievement to
2. Minutes of PTA meetings or
key
Parent-Teacher conferences
stakeholders, Efficiency 3
including in all quarters with proof of
parents/guardia parent’s/guardian’s
ns. attendance
3. Report cards with parent’s or
guardian’s signature in all
quarters supported by
minutes of meeting
4. Communication with
parents/guardians using
various modalities
Timeliness 3
 Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year
Weight Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Review
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Performance
per KRA Results
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
5. Anecdotal record showing
entries per quarter
6. Other documents showing
learner needs, progress and
achievement submitted to
other stakeholders

Basic 5. Plus Factor 13. Performed 10% 1. Certificate of Recognition or Quality 3

Education various related Participation
Services works/activities MAY 2019 2. Certificate of Training
that contribute – 3. Certificate of Speakership
to the teaching- OCTOBER 4. Committee involvement
learning 2019 5. Advisorship of Co-curricular
process. activities
6. Book or Journal Efficiency
Authorship/Co- 3
authorship/Contributorship
7. Coordinatorship/Chairperson
ship
8. Coaching and mentoring
learners in competitions
9. Mentoring pre-service/in-
service teachers
10. Others (Please specify and
provide annotations)
Timeliness

NESTOR R. AMOROSO LINDA C. MAHOMOC, Ed.D. CATLEAH B. ZAMORA

Secondary School Principal II Asst. School Principal II Teacher-1
Approving Authority Rater Ratee