Dropout Reduction Program Transcript of Dropout Reduction Program
Dropout Reduction Program Transcript of Dropout Reduction Program
UNDERLYING ASSUMPTIONS OF THE DORP: If the continued increase in the rate of school dropout is not
arrested, then the EFA goal of making every Filipino functionally literate by 2015 would not be achieved.
The increase in dropout rate could be arrested if the causes of the dropout problem are properly identified and
described and appropriate intervention programs are initiated to remove the causes. If the school, the home, the
community and the SARDO are actively involved in planning, developing, implementing the DORP, then the
DORP would succeed.
The likelihood of student leaving school could be reduced if the students’ felt needs are being satisfied and
learning experiences are pleasurable. Learning is scaffolding. If student attendance is irregular and previous
lessons are not fully mastered, then, the scaffolding process is weakened .
UNDERLYING ASSUMPTIONS OF THE DORP.
The full mastery of basic competencies could be achieved if the instructional process has a strong remedial
component. If the school has a strong and effective DORP, then the school dropout rate would be diminished.
The school DORP would have higher probability of success if it is provided support by the Division, Regional
and adequate technical and administrative Central Offices
1. DORP should contribute significantly to the attainment of the School Improvement Plan (SIP) objective
to reduce dropout rate and increase retention and achievement rate. It should seek to help SARDO
master the basic learning competencies.
2.Home visit as a DORP intervention should be properly planned; objective, expected output and
approaches should be clear and specific. DORP must educate the SARDO to be independent, critical and
creative problem solvers. DORP should not only prevent students from dropping out; it should also seek
to retrieve those who have dropped out. GUIDING PRINCIPLES OF THE DORP
3.DORP should explore alternatives modes that best meet the learning needs of its clients. DORP should
endeavor to build up the self-confidence and self-reliance of the SARDO. Decision on the type of
intervention appropriate to an individual should be based on a careful analysis of adequate, relevant,
accurate and up-to-date information.
4.DORP, in its zeal to focus on the SARDO, must see to it that the bright student, do not became
undeserved and disadvantaged. DORP should not only be reactive and preventive, but also be proactive
to cover the needs of those who dropped out and re-enrolled.
DO 74, s. 2010 - Guidelines on Mainstreaming the Dropout Reduction Program (DORP) in the Public
Secondary Schools
Facebook Twitter Google+ Share
June 4, 2010
DO 74, s. 2010
Guidelines on Mainstreaming the Dropout Reduction Program (DORP) in the Public Secondary Schools
1. The challenges posed by Project ReACH - “Find them, Reach them, Keep them and Make them Complete
School” inspired the implementers of the Dropout Reduction Program (DORP) in the secondary schools to
perform better. Project ReACH through the DORP is successfully reaching the 3.4 Million youth aged 12- 15
years old.
2. The effectiveness of the Dropout Reduction Program (DORP) in reducing dropout rate, in the attainment of zero
dropout rates, in increasing participation rate and improving learning outcomes using formal, non formal and
informal approaches has been proven in many schools across the regions. To share the best practices of this
Program, the Bureau of Secondary Education (BSE), this Department encourages all school heads to
mainstream or integrate this Program in the conceptualization/formulation of their school improvement plan
(SIP) in all public secondary schools. The DORP, formerly known as the Secondary Schooling Alternatives
(SSA) under the Secondary Education Development and Improvement Project (SEDIP), is one of the holistic
alternative delivery mode (ADM) offerings of the BSE.
3. Anchored on the targets of Education for All (EFA) 2015, and the Millennium Development Goals (MDG)
2015, the DORP aims to contribute to the achievement of improved performance indicators in basic education.
4. These approaches utilize the Family, Individual, Community and School (FICS) Analysis to facilitate the
identification of students-at-risk of dropping out (SARDO) by introducing the appropriate interventions. The
FICS Analysis encompasses the psychological, emotional, economic, cultural and social dimensions of the risk
factors for dropping out affected the students/learners.
5. A DORP plan shall be crafted by the school team after the final analysis and identification of potential dropouts.
Technical assistance shall be provided by the respective pools of trainers in the regions and/or divisions, and
shall be guided by the manual for training and the handbooks for specific intervention (e.g. Open High School,
EASE, self-learning modules and lesson plans). A Handbook of the Best Practices gathered from the successful
DORP implementers is also available for benchmarking.
6. These materials can be downloaded from the Bureau of Secondary Education (BSE)
website:www.bse.portal.ph. For more information, please contact the DORP Secretariat, Misses Prudencia
Martinez-Sanoy, Team Leader, Marichel T. Gonzales and Maria Victoria E. Cervantes at telefax no.: 632-7746
or send e-mail at save_s [email protected].
7. Immediate dissemination of and compliance with this Order is directed.
Sgd.
Mona D. Valisno
Secretary