Evaluation For Nonprint Materials (DepEd)

APPENDIX D
Research Instrument
EVALUATION TOOL FOR NON-PRINT MATERIAL
Instruction: Kindly examine the material carefully and for each evaluation criterion
consider the extent to which the resource meets the criteria. Check the appropriate
number [with 4 being Very Satisfactory (VS); 3 - Satisfactory (S); 2 - Poor; and 1
– Not Satisfactory]. For a rating below 4, write your comments/justifications on
each evaluation criterion. If an evaluation criterion is Not Applicable (NA), the
material is rated 3 on said criterion. (Not Applicable means that the criteria is not
relevant to the resource being evaluated. It is given the score of 3 so that the
evaluation score for each factor reflects only the performance against criteria that
are relevant to the nature of the resource being evaluated). Attach extra sheets if
necessary. Your report may be completed in soft or hardcopy. Please write legibly
if completing in hardcopy.
I. Evaluation of the Content Quality of the Visual Basic Application
Factor A. Content Quality VS S/NA Poor Not

4 3 2 Satisfactory
1
1. Content is consistent with
topics/skills found in the
DepED Learning
Competencies for the
subject and grade/year level
it was intended.
2. Concepts developed
contribute to enrichment,
reinforcement, or mastery of
the identified learning
objectives.
3. Content is accurate.
4. Content is up-to-date.
5. Content is logically
developed and organized.
6. Content is free from

cultural, gender, racial, or
ethnic bias.
7. Content stimulates and

promotes critical thinking.
8. Content is relevant to real-

life situations.
9. Language (including
vocabulary) is appropriate
to the target user level.
10. Content promotes positive

values that support
formative growth.
Total Points
Note: Resource must score at least Passed

30 points out of a maximum
40 points to pass this criterion.
Failed
Please put a check mark on the
appropriate box
II. Evaluation of the Instructional Quality of the Visual Basic Application
Factor B. Instructional Quality VS S/NA Poor Not

4 3 2 Satisfactory
1
1. Purpose of the material is
well defined.
2. Material achieves its
defined purpose.
3. Learning objectives are
clearly stated and
measurable.
4. Level of difficulty is
appropriate for the intended
target user.
5. Graphics / colors / sounds
are used for appropriate
instructional reasons.
6. Material is enjoyable,
stimulating, challenging,
and engaging.
7. Material effectively
stimulates creativity of
target user.
8. Feedback on target user’s
responses is effectively
employed.
9. Target user can control the
rate and sequence of
presentation and review.
10. Instruction is integrated
with target user’s previous
experience.
Total Points

Failed
appropriate box
III. Evaluation of the Technical Quality of the Visual Basic Application
Factor C. Technical Quality VS S/NA Poor Not

4 3 2 Satisfactory
1
1. Audio enhances
understanding of the
concept.
2. Speech and narration

(correct pacing, intonation,
and pronunciation) is clear
and can be easily
understood.
3. There is complete
synchronization of audio
with the visuals, if any.
4. Music and sound effects are
appropriate and effective for
instructional purposes.
5. Screen displays (text) are

uncluttered, easy to read,
and aesthetically pleasing.
6. Visual presentations (non-

text) are clear and easy to
interpret.
7. Visuals sustain interest and

do not distract user’s
attention.
8. Visuals provide accurate

representation of the
concept discussed.
9. The user support materials

(if any) are effective.
10. The design allows the target

user to navigate freely
through the material.
11. The material can easily and

independently be
used.
12. The material will run using

minimum system
requirements.
13. The program is free from
technical problems.
Total Points

Failed
appropriate box
IV. Evaluation for Other Findings
Factor D. Other Findings VS S/NA Poor Not

4 3 2 Satisfactory
Note down observations about 1
the information contained in the
material, where the following
errors are found.
1. Conceptual errors.
2. Factual errors.
3. Grammatical and/or
typographical errors.
4. Other errors (i.e.,

computational errors,
obsolete information, error
in the visuals, etc.).
Total Points

Failed
appropriate box
RECOMMENDATION
(Please put a check mark (/) in the appropriate box.)
I recommend the approval of this material for possible use in public

schoolsprovided that the corrections / revisions included in this report are made.
(Forcommercial resources (non-DepED owned resources) the Publisher must
implement all recommended corrections / revisions in their next printing or provide
errata.)
I do not recommend the approval of this material for possible use in public schools
for the reasons stated below and/or cited in this evaluation report. (Please use
separate sheet if necessary.)
I certify that this evaluation report and recommendation are my / our own and have been
made without any undue influence from others.
_____________________________________
Name and Signature of Evaluator
______________________
Date

Evaluation For Nonprint Materials (DepEd)

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Evaluation For Nonprint Materials (DepEd)

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Evaluation For Nonprint Materials (DepEd)

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

APPENDIX D

I. Evaluation of the Content Quality of the Visual Basic Application

Factor A. Content Quality VS S/NA Poor Not

6. Content is free from

7. Content stimulates and

8. Content is relevant to real-

10. Content promotes positive

Note: Resource must score at least Passed

Factor B. Instructional Quality VS S/NA Poor Not

Note: Resource must score at least Passed

III. Evaluation of the Technical Quality of the Visual Basic Application

Factor C. Technical Quality VS S/NA Poor Not

2. Speech and narration

5. Screen displays (text) are

6. Visual presentations (non-

7. Visuals sustain interest and

8. Visuals provide accurate

9. The user support materials

10. The design allows the target

11. The material can easily and

12. The material will run using

Note: Resource must score at least Passed

IV. Evaluation for Other Findings

Factor D. Other Findings VS S/NA Poor Not

4. Other errors (i.e.,

Note: Resource must score at least Passed

(Please put a check mark (/) in the appropriate box.)

I recommend the approval of this material for possible use in public

You might also like