Final Rail Gun Thesis
Final Rail Gun Thesis
Final Rail Gun Thesis
Submitted by:
Khawaja Hassaan Arif
2014-EE-364
Supervised by:
Ma’am Isra Nazeer
____________________ ____________________
____________________ ____________________
We declare that the work contained in this thesis is our own, except where explicitly
stated otherwise. In addition this work has not been submitted in support of any other
degree or professional qualification.
Signed: ____________________
Dated: ____________________
First and foremost, all praises and thanks to Allah (SWT), the Almighty, for His
uncountable blessings and the strength to complete this project. All best prayers and
peace be unto His best messenger, Muhammad (P.B.U.H), his pure descendant, and
his sacred family, and his noble companion.
Secondly, we would like to thank our families. Without their love and support over
the years none of this would have been possible. They have always been there for us
and we are thankful for everything they have helped us to achieve.
We offer our sincere gratitude to our supervisor, Ma’am Isra Nazeer, for her
patience, motivation and immense knowledge. First, being her students and then
working under her supervision in Final Year was a great privilege for us. We would
also like to extend our thanks to all faculty members of our department and to all
those who offer collegial guidance and assistance over the years.
Special thanks to Dr. Farooq Mukhtar, who put his faith on us and initiated this
project with great enthusiasm.
In the last, cheers to all our project discussions, for the sleepless nights we were
working together before deadlines and for all the fun we had in last four years. Also
we are grateful to all our friends and class fellows for their cooperation and help in
completing this project work.
Declaration……………………………………………………………… 3
Acknowledgements………………………………………………………4
Dedication………………………………………………………………..5
Table of Contents………………………………………………………...6
List of Figures……………………………………………………………8
Abstract…………………………………………………………………..9
Chapter 1 Introduction…………………………………………….......10
1.1 Research Background………………………………………...11
1.2 Problem Statement………………………………………........12
1.3 Objectives……………………………………………...……...13
1.4 Motivation…………………………………….........................13
Chapter 2 Literature Review…………………………………………. 14
Chapter 3 Drive Mechanism…………………………………………...19
3.1 General Working……………………………………………... 20
3.2 Ampere’s Right Hand Grip Rule………………………………22
3.3 Fleming’s Left Hand Rule………………………………..……22
3.4 Lorentz Force…………………………………………………..23
Chapter 4 Design of Rail Guns……………………………….…………24
4.1 Theory……………………………………………………..........25
4.2 Material to be used…………………………………………...…26
4.3 Design Considerations……………………………………...…...26
4.3.1 Conducting Rails……………………………….....…27
4.3.2 Projectile……………………………………………..28
4.3.3 Power Supply…………………………………………28
During 1950, Sir Mark Oliphant, an Australian physicist and first director of
the Research School of Physical Sciences at the new Australian National University,
initiated the design and construction of the world's largest (500 mega joule)
homopolar generator. This machine was operational from 1962 and was later used
to power a large-scale rail gun that was used as a scientific experiment.
Late into the first decade of the 2000s, the U.S. Navy tested a rail gun that
accelerates a 3.2 kg (7 pound) projectile to hypersonic velocities of approximately
2.4 kilometres per second (8,600 km/h), about Mach 7 (seven times speed of sound).
More researchers in the United States investigated the railgun. They aimed to
use the railgun as a defensive system, located in orbit and nicknamed "Star Wars".
It would be used to knock out the enemy's missiles from outer space. The U.S
government heavily funded this project and many contractors started working on
building different kinds of railguns. However, the degrees of success varied
dramatically. Proposed applications of railguns today are not limited to military uses,
but are also been considered launching satellites and for other commercial uses.
Among all applications for railguns, launching rockets into space is one of the most
exciting projects. In 2003, Ian Nab made a plan to build a system to launch 6 supplies
(such as food, water or fuel) into space. Based on cost, this method would be highly
superior to using the space shuttle; the ideal railgun system would cost only $528/kg,
compared of $20000/kg with the traditional method. The railgun system was to be
made to launch over 500 tons every year with the frequency of 2000 launches per
year. The results have yet to be seen. Proposals for using railguns as weapons include
projecting heavy non-explosive missiles at speeds up to 5000 miles per hour. The
energy outmatches that of an explosive shell.
This design will undertake to create a low-cost and low weight weapon for
security and military system. That will benefits the defense in many ways by giving
them a proper weaponry system.
Our main aim is to design this weapon that may have a long life, safe and easy
to handle. There are several rail gun projects working, having main concerns
regarding safety due to presence of high heat, high voltages and currents involved.
The disadvantages of railguns are due to the high current required to launch the
projectile, a huge amount of heat is produced at the contact between the rails and the
projectile. This heat corrodes the electrical contact surface of the projectile, and also
increases friction by making the surface rough, which reduce the efficiency
tremendously.
1.3 MOTIVATION
Today, the argument for a naval electromagnetic railgun relies upon two
principles, necessity and feasibility. The former probes the question of whether or
not the Navy needs to add a railgun to its current arsenal, and the latter explores the
suitability of placing such a weapon onboard a naval vessel. That is to say, a naval
railgun must prove to be useful in future warfare tactic and yet still fall within a
platform’s technological constraints, such as power supply and structural design.
Therefore, although an electromagnetic railgun has the potential to revolutionize
naval warfare, the practicality of such a weapon must first hold up to these issues.
For potential military applications, rail guns are usually of interest because
they can achieve much greater muzzle velocities than guns powered by conventional
chemical propellants. Increased muzzle velocities with better aerodynamically
streamlined projectiles can convey the benefits of increased firing ranges while, in
terms of target effects, increased terminal velocities can allow the use of kinetic
energy rounds incorporating hit to kill guidance, as replacements for explosive
shells. Therefore, typical military rail gun designs aim for muzzle velocities in the
range of 2000–3500 m/s with muzzle energies of 5–50 MJ. For comparison, 50MJ
is equivalent to the kinetic energy of a school bus weighing 5 metric tons, travelling
at 509 km/h (316 mph). For single loop rail guns, these mission requirements require
launch currents of a few million amperes, so a typical rail gun power supply might
be designed to deliver a launch current of 5 MA for a few milliseconds.
As the magnetic field strengths required for such launches will typically be
approximately 10 tesla, most contemporary rail gun designs are effectively "air
cored" , i.e., they do not use ferromagnetic materials such as iron to enhance the
It may be noted that rail gun velocities generally fall within the range of those
achievable by two stage light gas guns; However, the latter are generally only
considered to be suitable for laboratory use while rail guns are judged to offer some
potential prospects for development as military weapons. Another light gas gun, the
Combustion Light Gas Gun in a 155 mm prototype form was projected to achieve
2500 m/s with a 70 calibre bullet. In some hypervelocity research projects,
projectiles are "pre injected" into rail guns, to avoid the need for a standing start, and
both two stage light gas guns and conventional powder guns have been used for this
role. In principle, if rail gun power supply technology can be developed to provide
safe, compact, reliable, combat survivable and lightweight units, then the total
system volume and mass needed to accommodate such a power supply and its
primary fuel can become less than the required total volume and mass for a mission
equivalent quantity of conventional propellants and explosive ammunition. Such a
development would then convey a further military advantage in that the elimination
of explosives from any military weapons platform will decrease its vulnerability to
enemy fire.
Motivated by the re-emergence of the all-electric ship concept where all
installed mechanical power is first converted to electric power, the U.S. Navy has
invested heavily in EML-gun technology as an alternative to conventional ordinance
that uses explosives. Since a railgun with a designed muzzle energy
of 63 MJ can achieve launch velocities of 2.5 km/sec with a projectile range on the
order of 200 nautical miles, this weapon destroys its target with kinetic energy, far
exceeding the range of current 5-inch guns, while avoiding the logistic hazard of
F = (I)(L)(B)
where F is the net force, I is the current, L is the length of the rails and B is the
magnetic field. The force can be boosted by increasing either the length of the rails
or the amount of current. Because long rails pose design challenges, most rail guns
use strong currents on the order of a million amps to generate tremendous force.
The projectile, under the influence of the Lorentz force, accelerates to the end of
the rails opposite the power supply and exits through an aperture. The circuit is
broken, which ends the flow of current.
4.1 THEORY
A rail gun consists of two parallel metal rails connected to an electrical power
supply. When a conductive projectile is inserted between the rails (at the end
connected to the power supply), it completes the circuit. Electrons flow from the
negative terminal of the power supply up the negative rail, across the projectile, and
down the positive rail, back to the power supply. This current makes the rail gun
behave as an electromagnet, creating a magnetic field inside the loop formed by the
length of the rails up to the position of the armature.
In accordance with the right-hand rule, the magnetic field circulates around
each conductor. Since the current is in the opposite direction along each rail, the net
magnetic field between the rails (B) is directed at right angles to the plane formed
by the central axes of the rails and the armature. In combination with the current (I)
in the armature, this produces a Lorentz force which accelerates the projectile along
the rails, away from the power supply. There are also Lorentz forces acting on the
rails and attempting to push them apart, but since the rails are mounted firmly, they
cannot move. By definition, if a current of one ampere flows in a pair of ideal
infinitely long parallel conductors that are separated by a distance of one meter, then
the magnitude of the force on each meter of those conductors will be exactly 0.2
micro newtons. Furthermore, in general, the force will be proportional to the square
of the magnitude of the current and inversely proportional to the distance between
the conductors.
It also follows that, for rail guns with projectile masses of a few kg and bullet lengths
of a few cm, very large currents will be required to accelerate projectiles to velocities
of the order of 1000 m/s. A very large power supply, providing on the order of one
million amperes of current, will create a tremendous force on the projectile,
accelerating it to a speed of many kilometres per second (km/s). Although these
speeds are possible the heat generated from the propulsion of the
object is enough to erode the rails rapidly.
Under high use conditions, current rail guns would require frequent
replacement of the rails, or to use a heat resistant material that would be conductive
Table 4.1
The rail gun designed in this project consists of three parts. First part consist
of three power generators are used in series to provide a total of 180 V
approximately, second and third part consists of copper rail bars and the graphite
projectile respectively. Copper was chosen for conducting rails because it has high
heat conductance and copper is not magnetic. Four pairs of permanent magnets are
put above and below the gap between the copper bars to provide magnetic field
needed to accelerate the projectile. The white sheet seen in the figure is acrylic sheet.
Acrylic sheet has smooth surface that is more slippery and not rough and as a result
will provide less friction during a launch. The permanent magnets we chose are rare
earth magnets. Each pair creates a magnetic field with the magnitude of 1.5 Tesla.
The current can be created in various ways. Most people use a bank of capacitors to
provide the transient large current. The advantages of using bank of capacitors are it
is relatively easily to discharge and the instant current amount can go up to 20,000
amperes. However, using such high current can produce a tremendous amount of
heat, which can damage the system. We have designed a capacitor bank using 10
capacitors of rating 50V and 5600 micro Farad. The capacitor are arranged in such
a way that five pairs of two capacitors connected in series have been joined parallel
with the help of copper strips and bolts.
In our several attempts high currents produced welded our projectile between
the rails. Also our capacitor terminals burnt down as they could not bear high
currents during experiments. To avoid melting of projectile between rails we had to
introduce an injector assembly that will provide a little push to the projectile to move
in between the rails from one end to avoid welding.
The total amount of heat produced can easily destroy the experimental set-up
by melting the projectile or adhering the projectile with the rails it runs on. On the
other hand, the conventional railgun needs a high enough current to induce the
magnetic field along the accelerating path, therefore, the discharging time has to be
very small (in terms of milliseconds) to make the current high enough, meaning the
process of acceleration is as short as several milliseconds. As the magnetic field is
fully provided by the permanent magnets, the current needed in this design is much
smaller than that used in this railgun that depend on current to generate the magnetic
field. But if we avoid the use of magnets then high currents are needed to produce
strong magnetic field.
Rail guns have a number of potential practical applications, primarily for the
military. However, there are other theoretical applications currently being
researched.
6.2 WEAPONRY
Rail guns are being researched as weapons with projectiles that do not contain
explosives or propellants, but are given extremely high velocities: 2,500 m/s (8,200
ft/s) (approximately Mach 7 at sea level) or more. For comparison, the M16 rifle has
a muzzle speed of 930 m/s (3,050 ft/s), and the 16"/50 calibre Mark 7 gun that armed.
World War II American battleships has a muzzle speed of 760 m/s (2,490 ft/s)),
which because of its much greater projectile mass (up to 2,700 pounds) generated a muzzle
energy of 360 MJ and a downrange kinetic impact of energy of over 160 MJ, (see
also Project HARP).
By firing smaller projectiles at extremely high velocities, rail guns may yield
kinetic energy impacts equal or superior to the destructive energy of 5"/54 caliber
Mark 45 gun Naval guns, (which achieve up to 10MJ at the muzzle), but with much
greater range. Also, by firing more aerodynamically streamlined projectiles at
greater velocities, rail guns may achieve greater range, less time to target, and at
shorter ranges less wind drift, bypassing the physical limitations of conventional
firearms.
Helical rail guns are multi turn rail guns that reduce rail and brush current by
a factor equal to the number of turns. Two rails are surrounded by a helical barrel
and the projectile or reusable carrier is also helical. The projectile is energized
continuously by two brushes sliding along the rails, and two or more additional
brushes on the projectile serve to energize and commute several windings of the
helical barrel direction in front of and/or behind the projectile.
The helical rail gun is a cross between a rail gun and a coil gun. They do not
currently exist in a practical, usable form. A helical rail gun was built at MIT in 1980
and was powered by several banks of, for the time, large capacitors (approximately
4 farads). It was about 3 meters long, consisting of 2 meters of accelerating coil and
1 meter of decelerating coil. It was able to launch a glider or projectile about 500
meters.
A plasma rail gun is a linear accelerator and a plasma energy weapon which,
like a projectile rail gun, uses two long parallel electrodes to accelerate a "sliding
short" armature. However, in a plasma rail gun, the armature and ejected projectile
consists of plasma, or hot, ionized, gas like particles, instead of a solid slug of
material. MARAUDER (Magnetically Accelerated Ring to Achieve Ultrahigh
Directed Energy and Radiation) is, or was, a United States Air Force Research
Laboratory project concerning the development of a coaxial plasma rail gun. It is
one of several United States Government efforts to develop plasma based projectiles.
The first computer simulations occurred in 1990, and its first published experiment
appeared on August 1, 1993. As of 1993 the project appeared to be in the early
experimental stages. The weapon was able to produce doughnut shaped rings of
plasma and balls of lightning that exploded with devastating effects when hitting
their target. The project's initial success led to it becoming classified, and only a few
references to MARAUDER appeared after 1993. The project may or may not have
been scrapped sometime after 1995.
Full-scale models have been built and fired, including a 90 mm (3.5 in) bore,
9 MJ kinetic energy gun developed by the US DARPA. Rail and insulator wear
problems still need to be solved before rail guns can start to replace conventional
weapons. Probably the oldest consistently successful system was built by the UK's
Defence Research Agency at Dundrennan Range in Kirkcudbright, Scotland. This
system was established in 1993 and has been operated for over 10 years.
The Yugoslavian Military Technology Institute developed, within a project
named EDO0, a rail gun with 7 kJ kinetic energy, in 1985. In 1987 a successor was
created, project EDO1, that used projectile with a mass of 0.7 kg (1.5 lb) and
achieved speeds of 3,000 m/s (9,800 ft/s), and with a mass of 1.1 kg (2.4 lb) reached
speeds of 2,400 m/s (7,900 ft/s). It used a track length of 0.7 m (2.3 ft). According
to those working on it, with other modifications it was able to achieve a speed of
4,500 m/s (14,800 ft/s). The aim was to achieve projectile speed of 7,000 m/s (23,000
ft/s). China is now one of the major players in electromagnetic launchers; in 2012 it
hosted the 16th International Symposium on Electromagnetic Launch Technology
(EML 2012) at Beijing. Satellite imagery in late 2010 suggested that tests were being
conducted at an armor and artillery range near Baotou, in the Inner Mongolia
Autonomous Region
The United States military is funding rail gun experiments. At the University
of Texas at Austin Center for Electro mechanics, military rail guns capable of
delivering tungsten armor piercing bullets with kinetic energies of nine mega joules
have been developed. 9 MJ is enough energy to deliver 2 kg (4.4 lb) of projectile at
3 km/s (1.9 mi/s)—at that velocity, a sufficiently long rod of tungsten or another
dense metal could easily penetrate a tank, and potentially pass through it, (see
APFSDS).
Rail guns may also be miniaturized for inertial confinement nuclear fusion.
Fusion is triggered by very high temperature and pressure at the core. Current
technology calls for multiple lasers, usually over 100, to concurrently strike a fuel
pellet, creating a symmetrical compressive pressure. Rail guns may be able to trigger
fusion by firing energetic plasma from multiple directions. The process developed
involves four key steps.
Plasma is pumped into a chamber.
When the pressure is great enough, a diaphragm will rupture, sending
gas down the rail.
Shortly afterwards, a sufficient voltage is applied to the rails, creating a
conduction path of ionized gas.
This plasma is accelerated down the rail, eventually being ejected at a
large velocity.
The rails and dimensions are in the order of centimetres.
[4]- J.McFarland and I. R. McNab, "A long-range naval rail gun", IEEE
Transactions on Magnetics., vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 289-294, Jan.
[8]- Bernardes, Jack S., Stumborg, Michael F., and Jean, Thomas E.,
“Analysis of a Capacitor-Based Pulsed-Power System for Driving Long-
[9]- Denny, Mark, “The Internal Ballistics of an Air Gun,” The Physics
Teacher, Vol 49, Feb 2011, pp 81-83.
[13]- Fletcher, Seth (20130605). "Navy Tests 32Megajoule Rail gun |".
Popular Science.
Retrieved 20130616.