AWP 5 Unit Notes PDF
AWP 5 Unit Notes PDF
A Course Material
on
Antenna and Wave Propagation
By
A.Parimala
Assistant Professor
Electronics And Communication Engineering Department
Quality Certificate
Subject Code:EC6602
Year/Sem:III/VI
Name: A.Parimala
This is to certify that the course material being prepared by Ms.A.Parimala is of the
adequate quality. She has referred more than five books and one among them is
from abroad author.
Seal: Seal:
TOTAL : 45 PERIODS
TEXT BOOKS:
1. John D Kraus,” Antennas for all Applications”, 3rd Edition, Mc Graw Hill,
2005.
REFERENCES:
1. Edward C.Jordan and Keith G.Balmain” Electromagnetic Waves and
Radiating Systems” Prentice Hall of India, 2006.
2. R.E.Collin,”Antennas and Radiowave Propagation”, Mc Graw Hill 1985.
3. Constantine.A.Balanis “Antenna Theory Analysis and Design”, Wiley Student
Edition, 2006.
4. Rajeswari Chatterjee, “Antenna Theory and Practice” Revised Second
Edition New Age International Publishers, 2006.
5. S. Drabowitch, “Modern Antennas” Second Edition Springer Publications,
2007.
6. Robert S.Elliott “Antenna Theory and Design” Wiley Student Edition, 2006.
7. H.Sizun “Radio Wave Propagation for Telecommunication Applications”, First
Indian Reprint, Springer Publications, 2007.
CONTENTS
1 Unit – I 6
2 Unit – II 31
3 Unit – III 63
4 Unit – IV 96
5 Unit – V 139
Unit – I
Fundamentals of Radiation
Part – A
Part-B
1. Define the following parameters and explain the terms (1) Radiation
pattern (2) Input Impedance (3) Polarization (4) Antenna temperature (5)
Reciprocity theorem.(16M)
[CO1-L2-April/May 2011, Nov/Dec2011,May/June 2012]
In the field of antenna design the term radiation pattern (or antenna pattern or
far-field pattern) refers to the directional (angular) dependence of the strength of
the radio waves from the antenna or other source.
Particularly in the fields of fiber optics, lasers, and integrated optics, the term
radiation pattern, or near-field radiation pattern, may also be used as a synonym
for the near-field pattern or Fresnel pattern.
This refers to the positional dependence of the electromagnetic field in the near-
field, or Fresnel region of the source. The near-field pattern is most commonly
defined over a plane placed in front of the source, or over a cylindrical or
spherical surface enclosing it.
The far field radiation pattern may be represented graphically as a plot of one of
a number of related variables, including; the field strength at a constant (large)
radius (an amplitude pattern or field pattern), the power per unit solid angle
(power pattern) and the directive gain. Very often, only the relative amplitude is
plotted, normalized either to the amplitude on the antenna boresight, or to the
total radiated power. The plotted quantity may be shown on a linear scale, or in
dB. The plot is typically represented as a three dimensional graph (as at right), or
as separate graphs in the vertical plane and horizontal plane. This is often known
as a polar diagram
(a) HPBW: The half power beamwidth (HPBW) can be defined as the angle
subtended by the half power points of the main lobe.
(b) Main Lobe: This is the radiation lobe containing the direction of maximum
radiation.
(c) Minor Lobe: All the lobes other then the main lobe are called the minor
lobes. These lobes represent the radiation in undesired directions. The level
of minor lobes is usually expressed as a ratio of the power density in the lobe
in question to that of the major lobe. This ratio is called as the side lobe level
(expressed in decibels).
(d) Back Lobe: This is the minor lobe diametrically opposite the main lobe.
(e) Side Lobes: These are the minor lobes adjacent to the main lobe and are
separated by various nulls. Side lobes are generally the largest among the
minor lobes.
(2) Input Impedance
The impedance of antenna measured at the terminals where transmission line
carrying R.F. power connected is called antenna input impedance. These
terminals are nothing but feed points of the antenna, the impedance is also called
feed point impedance or terminal impedance. As the R.F. power carried by the
transmission line from the transmitter, excites or drives the antenna, the antenna
input impedance can be alternatively called driving point impedance of antenna.
When the antenna is lossless and isolated from ground and other objects, the
impedance offered by antenna to the transmission line is represented by two
terminal networks with impedance Z L as shown in the Fig. 6(b). Note that the
notation Z L represents that the antenna impedance acts as load to the transmission
line driving antenna. With a lossless and isolated antenna, the antenna terminal
impedance is same as the self impedance of the antenna, which is represented by
Z 11 . The self impedance of the antenna is a complex quantity given by,
Z 11 = R 11 + j X 11 …(1)
The real part of Z 11 i.e. R 11 is called self resistance or radiation resistance of
antenna, while the imaginary part of Z 11 i.e. X 11 is called self reactance of antenna.
For half wave dipole, the self impedance is typically given by,
Note: The self impedance of antenna is always positive. The value of self
impedance is same for antenna used either as transmitting antenna or receiving
antenna. The self impedance of the The impedance of antenna measured at the
terminals where transmission line carrying R.F. power connected is called antenna
input impedance. These terminals are nothing but feed points of the antenna, the
impedance is also called feed point impedance or terminal impedance. As the R.F.
power carried by the transmission line from the transmitter, excites or drives the
antenna, the antenna input impedance can be alternatively called driving point
impedance of antenna.
For half wave dipole, the self impedance is typically given by,
Thus the mutual impedance of the coupled circuit is defined as negative ratio
of the voltage induced at the open terminals of once circuit to the current in other
circuit. Mathematically we can write,
Exactly on the similar lines to the coupled circuits, the mutual impedance of the
antenna is given by,
But according to reciprocity theorem, we can write mutual impedance of antenna as,
(3) Polarization
The polarization of the EM field describes the orientation of its vectors at a given
point and how it varies with time. In other words, it describes the way the direction
and magnitude of the field
vectors (usually E) change in time. Polarization is associated with TEM time-
harmonic waves where the H vector relates to the E vector simply by
In antenna theory, we are concerned with the polarization of the field in the plane
orthogonal to the direction of propagation—this is the plane defined by the vectors of
the far field. Remember that the far field is a quasi-TEM field.
Hence the polarization is the locus traced by the extremity of the time-varying field
vector at a fixed observation point.
According to the shape of the trace, three types of polarization exist for harmonic
fields: linear, circular and elliptical. Any polarization can be represented by two
orthogonal linear polarizations, (E x , E y ) or (E H , E V ), whose fields are out of phase
by an angle of δ L .
This states that the temperature surrounding the antenna is integrated over the
entire sphere, and weighted by the antenna's radiation pattern. Hence, an isotropic
antenna would have a noise temperature that is the average of all temperatures
around the antenna; for a perfectly directional antenna (with a pencil beam), the
antenna temperature will only depend on the temperature in which the antenna is
"looking".
The noise power received from an antenna at temperature can be expressed in
terms of the bandwidth (B) the antenna (and its receiver) are operating over:
Statement: "In any linear and bilateral network consisting the linear and bilateral
impedance the ratio of voltage V applied between any two terminals to the current I
measured in any branch is same as the ratio V to I obtained by interchanging the
positions of voltage source and the ammeter used for current measurement."
The ratio V to I is generally called transfer impedance. Here both the voltage source
and ammeter are assumed to have zero impedance. This theorem holds good if
both, voltage source and ammeter have same internal impedances.
This theorem is equally useful in the circuit theory as well as the field theory. Let us
consider that the antenna system is represented as a 4-terminal network with pair of
terminals at input and another pair of terminals at the output. It is also called two port
network as pair of terminals is defined as port. The 4-terminal representation of the
antenna system is as shown in the Fig. 10
(a). Note that the pair of terminals or ports are nothing but the terminals of the
dipoles as shown in the Fig. 10 (b).
Thus according to the reciprocity theorem for the linear and bilateral networks, the
conditions of the reciprocity of the network are,
The impedances z 12 and z 21 are called mutual impedances which are individually
ratio of open circuit voltage at one port to the current at other port. Similarly
admittances y 12 and y 21 are called transfer admittances which are individually the
ratio of a short circuited current at one port to the voltage at other port. Finally the
impedances zɳ 12 and zɳ 21 are called transfer impedances which are individually the
ratio of an open circuit voltage at one port to a short circuit current at other port.
2. Derive the magnetic field components and vector potential of the current
element hertizian dipole. (16M)
[CO1-H1-April/May 2011, Nov/Dec2011, May/June 2012, April/May 2014]
To calculate the electromagnetic field radiated in the space by a short dipole, the
retarded potential is used. A short dipole is an alternating current element. It is also
called an oscillating current element.
Let us write the expression for vector potential Ā at point P, using previous
knowledge. The vector potential Ā is given by,
Here the vector potential is retarded in time by r/v sec, where v is the velocity of
propagation. As the current clement is placed along the z-axis, the vector potential
will also have only one component in positive z-direction. Hence we can write,
From equation (2) it is clear that the component of vector potential A z can be
obtained by integrating the current density J over the volume. This includes
integration over the cross section area of an element of wire and integration along its
length. But the integration of the current density J over cross-section area yields
current I. Now this current is assumed to be constant along the length dL, the
integration of J over the length dL gives value IdL. Thus mathematically we can
write.
Substituting the value of integration from equation (3) in equation (2), the vector
potential in z-direction is given by,
As we are using spherical co-ordinate system, to find the curl of Ā, we must find the
component of Ā in r, θ and ɳ directions. From the Fig. 18, it is clear that,
Substituting value of A Z ,
Equation (10) indicates that the magnetic field exists only in ɳ direction.
After calculating the magnetic field, now let us calculate the electric field given by,
But ∂/∂ ɳ =0
In this section the significance of each term in the expressions for the field
components are describe. Let us rewrite the expressions for the field components.
There is only one component for the magnetic field, in direction given by,
There are two components for the electric field, in and direction, given by,
3. Derive the expression for the field quantities radiated from half wave dipole
and provide its radiation resistance. (16M)
[CO1-H1-April/May2011, Nov/Dec 2012 April/May 2013, April/May 2015]
Let us consider linear antennas of finite length and having negligible diameter. For
such antennas, when fed at the center, a reasonably good approximation of the
current is given by,
The relationship stated above equation (7.37a) - (7.37f) may be verified for a
Herzian dipole using equations (7.22), (7.24a) and (7.24b).
This distribution assumes that the current vanishes at the two end points i.e.,
. The plot of current distribution are shown in the figure 7.7 for different 'l'.
.....................................(7.39)
...............................................(7.40)
From Fig 7.8(b), for the far field calculation, for the phase variation
and for amplitude term.
.....................(7.41)
............................(7.42)
Therefore the vector potential for the halfwave dipole can be written as:
.............................(7.43)
From (7.37b),
..............................(7.44)
.........................................................................(7.45)
................................(7.46)
and ...............................................................(7.47)
.......................................................(7.48)
Further, using Eqn(7.27) the directivity function for the dipole antenna can be written
as
...........................(7.49)
Thus directivity of such dipole antenna is 1.64 as compared to 1.5 for an elementary
dipole. The half power beam width in the E-plane can be found to be 780 as
compared to 900 for a Hertzian dipole.
4. Explain the construction and working principle of Yagi Uda Antenna and
derive its impedance.(16M)
[CO1-L2-April/May 2011, Nov/Dec2011, April/May 2013, April/May 2015]
A Yagi–Uda antenna, commonly known as a Yagi antenna, is a directional
antenna consisting of multiple parallel elements in a line, usually half-wave
dipoles made of metal rods. Yagi–Uda antennas consist of a single driven
element connected to the transmitter or receiver with a transmission line, and
additional parasitic elements: a so-called reflector and one or more directors.
The reflector element is slightly longer than the driven dipole, whereas the directors
are a little shorter. This design achieves a very substantial increase in the
antenna's directionality and gain compared to a simple dipole.
Also called a "beam antenna", the Yagi is very widely used as a high-gain antenna
on the HF, VHF and UHF bands It has moderate gain which depends on the number
of elements used, typically limited to about 17 dBi, linear polarization,unidirectional
(end-fire) beam pattern with high front-to-back ratio of up to 20 db. and is
lightweight, inexpensive and simple to construct.
Description:
The Yagi–Uda antenna consists of a number of parallel thin rod elements in a line,
usually half-wave long, typically supported on a perpendicular crossbar or "boom"
along their centers. There is a single driven element driven in the center (consisting
of two rods each connected to one side of the transmission line), and a variable
number of parasitic elements, a single reflector on one side and optionally one or
more directors on the other side. The parasitic elements are not electrically
connected to the transmitter or receiver, and serve as passive radiators, reradiating
the radio waves to modify the radiation pattern. Typical spacings between elements
vary from about 1/10 to 1/4 of a wavelength, depending on the specific design. The
directors are slightly shorter than the driven element, while the reflector(s) are
slightly longer. The radiation pattern is unidirectional, with the main lobe along the
axis perpendicular to the elements in the plane of the elements, off the end with the
directors.
Conveniently, the parasitic elements have a node (point of zero RF voltage) at their
centre, so they can be attached to a conductive metal support at that point without
need of insulation, without disturbing their electrical operation. They are usually
bolted or welded to the antenna's central support boom. The driven element is fed at
centre so its two halves must be insulated where the boom supports them.
The gain increases with the number of parasitic elements used. Only one reflector is
used since the improvement of gain with additional reflectors is negligible, but Yagis
have been built with up to 30–40 directors.
The bandwidth of the antenna is the frequency range between the frequencies at
which the gain drops 3 dB (one-half the power) below its maximum. The Yagi–Uda
array in its basic form has very narrow bandwidth, 2–3 percent of the centre
frequency.There is a tradeoff between gain and bandwidth, with the bandwidth
narrowing as more elements are used.For applications that require wider
bandwidths, such as terrestrial television, Yagi–Uda antennas commonly feature
trigonal reflectors, traps (described below), and larger diameter conductors, in order
to cover the relevant portions of the VHF and UHF bands.
Yagi–Uda antennas used for amateur radio are sometimes designed to operate on
multiple bands. These elaborate designs create electrical breaks along each
element (both sides) at which point a parallel LC (inductor and capacitor) circuit is
inserted. This so-called trap has the effect of truncating the element at the higher
frequency band, making it approximately a half wavelength in length. At the lower
frequency, the entire element (including the remaining inductance due to the trap) is
close to half-wave resonance, implementing a different Yagi–Uda antenna. Using a
second set of traps, a "triband" antenna can be resonant at three different bands.
Given the associated costs of erecting an antenna and rotor system above a tower,
the combination of antennas for three amateur bands in one unit is a very practical
solution. The use of traps is not without disadvantages, however, as they reduce the
bandwidth of the antenna on the individual bands and reduce the antenna's
electrical efficiency and subject the antenna to additional mechanical considerations
(wind loading, water and insect ingress).
Theory of Operation:
Consider a Yagi–Uda consisting of a reflector, driven element and a single director
as shown here. The driven element is typically a λ/2 dipole or folded dipole and is
the only member of the structure that is directly excited (electrically connected to
the feedline). All the other elements are considered parasitic. That is, they reradiate
power which they receive from from the driven element (they also interact with each
other).
One way of thinking about the operation of such an antenna is to consider a
parasitic element to be a normal dipole element fed at its centre, with a short circuit
across its feed point. As is well known in transmission linetheory, a short circuit
reflects all of the incident power 180 degrees out of phase. So one could as well
model the operation of the parasitic element as the superposition of a dipole element
receiving power and sending it down a transmission line to a matched load, and a
transmitter sending the same amount of power up the transmission line back toward
the antenna element.
If the transmitted voltage wave were 180 degrees out of phase with the received
wave at that point, the superposition of the two voltage waves would give zero
voltage, equivalent to shorting out the dipole at the feedpoint (making it a solid
element, as it is). Thus a half-wave parasitic element radiates a wave 180° out of
phase with the incident wave.
The fact that the parasitic element involved is not exactly resonant but is somewhat
shorter (or longer) than λ/2 modifies the phase of the element's current with respect
to its excitation from the driven element.
The so-called reflector element, being longer than λ/2, has an inductive reactance
which means the phase of its current lags the phase of the open-circuit voltage that
would be induced by the received field. The director element, on the other hand,
being shorter than λ/2, has a capacitive reactance with the voltage phase lagging
that of the current.
The elements are given the correct lengths and spacings so that the radio waves
radiated by the driven element and those reradiated by the parasitic elements all
arrive at the front of the antenna in phase, so they superpose and add, increasing
signal strength in the forward direction. In other words, the crest of the forward wave
from the reflector element reaches the driven element just as the crest of the wave is
emitted from that element. These waves reach the first director element just as the
crest of the wave is emitted from that element, and so on. The waves in the reverse
direction interfere destructively, cancelling out, so the signal strength radiated in the
reverse direction is small. Thus the antenna radiates a unidirectional beam of radio
waves from the front (director end) of the antenna.
While the above qualitative explanation is useful for understanding how parasitic
elements can enhance the driven elements' radiation in one direction at the expense
of the other, the assumptions used are quite inaccurate. Since the so-called
reflector, the longer parasitic element, has a current whose phase lags that of the
driven element, one would expect the directivity to be in the direction of the reflector,
opposite of the actual directional pattern of the Yagi–Uda antenna. In fact, that
would be the case were we to construct a phased array with rather closely spaced
elements all driven by voltages in phase, as we posited.
However these elements are not driven as such but receive their energy from the
field created by the driven element, so we will find almost the opposite to be true.
For now, consider that the parasitic element is also of length λ/2. Again looking at
the parasitic element as a dipole which has been shorted at the feedpoint, we can
see that if the parasitic element were to respond to the driven element with an open-
circuit feedpoint voltage in phase with that applied to the driven element (which we'll
assume for now) then the reflected wave from the short circuit would induce a
current 180° out of phase with the current in the driven element. This would tend to
cancel the radiation of the driven element. However, due to the reactance caused by
the length difference, the phase lag of the current in the reflector, added to this 180°
lag, results in a phase advance, and vice versa for the director. Thus the directivity
of the array indeed is in the direction towards the director.
One must take into account an additional phase delay due to the finite distance
between the elements which further delays the phase of the currents in both the
directors and reflector(s). The case of a Yagi–Uda array using just a driven element
and a director is illustrated in the accompanying diagram taking all of these effects
into account. The wave generated by the driven element (green) propagates in both
the forward and reverse directions (as well as other directions, not shown). The
director receives that wave slightly delayed in time (amounting to a phase delay of
about 35° which will be important for the reverse direction calculations later), and
generating a current that would be out of phase with the driven element (thus an
additional 180° phase shift), but which is further advanced in phase (by about 70°)
due to the director's shorter length. In the forward direction the net effect is a wave
emitted by the director (blue) which is about 110° (180°–70°) retarded with respect
to that from the driven element (green), in this particular design. These waves
combine to produce the net forward wave (bottom, right) with an amplitude slightly
larger than the individual waves.
In the reverse direction, on the other hand, the additional delay of the wave from the
director (blue) due to the spacing between the two elements (about 35° of phase
delay traversed twice) causes it to be about 180° (110° + 2 × 35°) out of phase with
the wave from the driven element (green). The net effect of these two waves, when
added (bottom, left), is almost complete cancellation. The combination of the
director's position and shorter length has thus obtained a unidirectional rather than
the bidirectional response of the driven (half-wave dipole) element alone.
A full analysis of such a system requires computing the mutual impedances between
the dipole elements[11]which implicitly takes into account the propagation delay due
to the finite spacing between elements. We model element number j as having a
feedpoint at the centre with a voltage V j and a current I j flowing into it. Just
considering two such elements we can write the voltage at each feedpoint in terms
of the currents using the mutual impedances Z ij :
Z 11 and Z 22 are simply the ordinary driving point impedances of a dipole, thus
73 + j43 ohms for a half-wave element (or purely resistive for one slightly shorter, as
is usually desired for the driven element). Due to the differences in the elements'
lengths Z 11 and Z 22 have a substantially different reactive component. Due to
reciprocity we know that Z 21 = Z 12 .
and so
This is the current induced in the parasitic element due to the current I 1 in the driven
element. We can also solve for the voltage V 1 at the feedpoint of the driven element
using the earlier equation:
Unit- II
Part – A
The uniqueness theorem can be stated in several different forms but it essentially
states that for a given set of sources and boundary conditions in a lossy medium,
the solution to Maxwell's equations is unique.
9. What is the relationship between the terminal impedances of slot and dipole
antennas? [CO2-L2- April/May 2012, April/May 2013]
ZsZd = η0 2 /4
Where ZS = terminal impedance of slot antenna
Zd = Terminal impedance if dipole antenna
η0 = Intrinsic impedance of free space = 377 ohms
10. What is the difference between slot antenna and its complementary
antenna? [CO2-L1- Nov/Dec 2013, April/May 2014]
i. Polarization are different ie. The electric fields associated with the slot antenna
are identical with the magnetic field of the complementary dipole antenna.
ii. The electric field be vertically polarized for the slot and horizontally polarized for
the dipole.
iii.Radiation from the back side of the conducting plane of the slot antenna has
opposite polarity from that of complementary antenna.
Microstrip antennas are popular for low profile applications at frequencies above 100
MHz. they usually consists of a rectangular metal patch on a dielectric coated
ground plane (circuit board). Hence, a microstrip patch antenna is also called as
printed antenna.
Part-B
1. What is Horn Antenna? Sketch the various types of Horn Antenna and
explain its operation. (16M) [CO2-L2- Nov/Dec 2011, April/May 2014]
Rectangular Horn Antennas Horn antennas are popular in the microwave band
(above 1 GHz). Horns provide high gain, low VSWR (with waveguide feeds),
relatively wide bandwidth, and they are not difficult to make. There are three
basic types of rectangular horns.
The rectangular horns are ideally suited for rectangular waveguide feeders. The
horn acts as a gradual transition from a waveguide mode to a free-space mode of
the EM wave. When the feeder is a cylindrical waveguide, the antenna is usually a
conical horn.
The geometry and the respective parameters shown in the figure below are
used often in the subsequent analysis.
The tangential field arriving at the input of the horn is composed of the
transverse field components of the waveguide dominant mode TE 10 :
π
E y ( x ) = E 0 cos x e − j βg z
a (18.4)
e− j β ( R −R0 ) . (18.5)
Since the aperture is not flared in the y-direction, the phase is uniform in this
direction. We first approximate the path of the wave in the horn:
E ay ( x ) ≈ E 0 cos xe 2R 0 . (18.8)
A
The field at the aperture plane outside the aperture is assumed equal to zero. The
E
field expression (18.8) is substituted in the integral I y :
E ′ ′ j β ( x ′ sin θ cos j + y′sin θ sin j) ′′
I y = ∫∫Ea y ( x , y )e dx dy , (18.9)
SA
+ A /2 π − j b x′
2
+b/2
I y
E
= E0 ∫ cos x′e 2R 0 e j bx′ sin θ cosj dx ′ × ∫ e j b y′sin θ sinj dy′. (18.10)
− A /2 A −b/2
(((((( ((((((
−I (θ ,j)
x π
∫
2
C (x) = cos τ dτ; C (− x ) = −C (x),
2
0
S (− x ) = −S (x).
S (x) ∫ x Sinπ τ
2
e − j βr E
E θ = j β 4πr (1 + cos θ )sin j ⋅I y ,
E
E j = j β e − j βr (1 + cos θ )cos j ⋅I y ,
4πr
The amplitude pattern of the H-plane sectoral horn is obtained as
bb
1 + cosθ sin sin θ sinϕ
2
E= ⋅ ⋅I (θ, ϕ). (18.17)
2 bb
Principal-plane patterns
H-plane (ϕ = 0°):
(18.18)
1 + cos θ I (θ, ϕ = 0 °)
F H (θ ) = ⋅
2 I (θ = 0°, ϕ = 0 °)
The directivity of the H-plane sectoral horn is calculated by the general directivity
expression for apertures
4π ∫∫ Eads′ 2
SA
D 0 = λ2 ⋅ ∫∫ | E a |2 ds′ . (18.19)
SA
It can be shown that the optimal directivity is obtained if the relation between A and
R 0 is
A = 3λR 0 ,
and
1 y2
R − R0 ≈
2 R0
are made, which are analogous to (18.6) and (18.7).
β B βB
r1 = − − R0 sinθ sinϕ ,
πR0 2 2
β B βB
r2 = + − R0 sinθ sinϕ .
πR0 2 2
Directivity
The optimal relation between the flared height B and the horn apex length R 0 that
produces the maximum possible directivity is
B= 2λR 0
Optimum Pyramidal horn design
Usually, the optimum (from the point of view of maximum gain) design of a horn
is desired because it results in the shortest axial length. The whole design can be
actually reduced to the solution of a single fourth-order equation. For a horn to be
realizable, the following must be true:
RE = RH = RP . (18.42)
The figures below summarize the notations used in describing the horn’s geometry.
= = , (18.43)
RH A/2−a/2 A−a
E
R B/2 B
0
RE = B / 2 − b / 2 = B −b . (18.44)
4p
G= 2 ε ap AB , (18.49)
λ
gives the relation between A, the gain G, and the aperture efficiency ε ap :
4p 12 8 A( a − a)
G= ε ap A b + b + , (18.50)
2
λ 2 3
2 2 4
3bG λ 3G λ
4 3 2 2
⇒ A − aA + 8pε ap A − 32p ε ap = 0 . (18.51)
Equation (18.51) is the optimum pyramidal horn design equation. The optimum-gain
value of ε ap = 0.51 is usually used, which makes the equation a fourth-order
polynomial equation in A. Its roots can be found analytically (which is not particularly
easy) and numerically. In a numerical solution, the first guess is usually set at A(0) =
0.45λ G . Once A is found, B can be computed from (18.48) and R E = R H is
computed from (18.47).
Sometimes, an optimal horn is desired for a known axial length R 0 . In this case,
there is no need for nonlinear-equation solution. The design procedure follows the
steps: (a) find A from (18.24), (b) find B from (18.37), and (c) calculate the gain G
using (18.49) where ε ap = 0.51.
The gain increases with frequency, which is typical for aperture antennas. However,
the curve shows saturation at higher frequencies. This is due to the decrease of the
aperture efficiency, which is a result of an increased phase difference in the field
distribution at the aperture.
The slot antenna consists of a radiator formed by cutting a narrow slot in a large
metal surface. Suchan antenna is shown in figure 3-18. The slot length is a
half wavelength at the desired frequency and thewidth is a small fraction of
a wavelength. The antenna is frequently compared to a conventional half-wave
dipole consisting of two flat metal strips. The physical dimensions of the metal strips
are such thatthey would just fit into the slot cut out of the large metal sheet.
Each type of transmission line reflects the incident wave from the terminations. The
combination of two waves traveling in opposite directions creates a standing wave
on the line. The current and voltage are 90◦ out of phase and 90◦ out of space phase
(Figure 5-1). Current and voltage change places on the short-circuited termination of
the slot. The dipole is not a uniform transmission line, but we can approximate the
current as a standing wave with the current vanishing on the ends. The slot voltage
is a standing wave also vanishing on the ends. The standing waves for a center-fed
dipole or slot are expressed as follows:
By integrating Eqs. (2-5) and (2-10), we compute far fields for radiators centered on
the z-axis through the far-field conversion
where L is the total dipole length. Using the Y = 0 plane as the slot ground plane, the
far-field magnetic field is found as
where L is the total slot length. We apply the upper sign for Y > 0 and the lower sign
for Y < 0. The electric field of the slot is found from Eφ = −ηHθ . Equations (5-2) and
(5-3) have the same pattern shape and directivity. We integrate the magnitude
squared of Eqs. (5-2) and (5-3) to determine the average radiation intensity.
where η is the impedance of free space (376.7 ). When these are integrated over
the radiation sphere to compute the power radiated, the results contain either |I0| 2
(dipole) or |V0| 2 (slot), the maximum sinusoidal current (voltage). We define the
radiation resistance (conductance) as
Figure 5-4 is a plot of the radiation resistance of each versus length [2, p. 157]. The
input resistance differs from the radiation resistance because it is the ratio of the
input current (voltage) to the power radiated:
The input resistances (Figure 5-4) differ from the radiation resistances by Eq. (5-6).
The input resistance of a one-wavelength dipole is large but not infinite, as shown; it
depends greatly on the diameter and input region. If we take the product of the
radiation or input resistances, we determine that
The input resistance depends on the current at the input [Eq. (5-6)]. When the
standing-wave current is high and the voltage is low, the input resistance is
moderate. A center-fed half-wavelength dipole has the same input resistance as
radiation resistance, since the current maximum occurs as the input. On the other
hand, a center-fed halfwavelength slot has a current minimum (voltage maximum) at
its input, which gives it high input resistance. When both are a full wavelength long,
the dipole standingwave current is at a minimum and the slot standing-wave current
is at a maximum (Figure 5-2). The dipole has a high input resistance and the slot
has a low input resistance. We can lower the input resistance by feeding at a high
current point, but we may excite a distribution different from that expected. A short
dipole looks like a capacitor at the input. As the length increases, the radiation
resistance grows and the capacitance decreases. Just before the length reaches
λ/2, the capacitance becomes zero. The exact length at which the antenna
resonates (zero reactance) depends on the diameter of the elements and the input
gap. A good starting point is 95% of a half wavelength. Beyond the resonant length,
the dipole becomes inductive. The impedance of a thin half-wavelength dipole is 73
+ j42.2 , whereas the resonant-length dipole resistance is about 67 . The slot
looks like an inductor when short.
The inductance increases as its length increases and the slot resonates like the
dipole, just short of λ/2. Additional resonances occur at longer lengths. Increasing
the frequency is equivalent to increasing the length for the thin dipole.
BABINET–BOOKER PRINCIPLE:
A strip dipole and a slot are complementary antennas. The solution for the slot can
be found from the solution to an equivalent dipole by an interchange of the electric
and magnetic fields. Not only the pattern but also the input impedance can be found.
Figure 5-5 shows two such complementary structures.
Babinet’s principle of optical screens (scalar fields) states that given the solutions to
the diffraction patterns of a screen, Fi, and the screen’s complement, Fc, the sum
equals the pattern without the screen.
where Z1 is the input impedance of the structure, Zc the input impedance of the
complementary structure, and η the impedance of free space (376.7 ). Equation
(5-8) extends Eq. (5-7) to the total impedance and includes mutual impedances as
well as self-impedances. Certain antennas, such as flat spirals, are self-
complementary—an exchange of the spaces and conductors leaves the structure
unchanged except for rotation. For a twoarm structure,
Rumsey [5, p. 28] extended these ideas to antennas with more than two conductors
to determine the input impedances in various feeding modes. We must relate flat-
strip dipoles to normal round-rod dipoles to use the available results for round
dipoles. The diameter of an equivalent round rod equals one-half the strip width of
the flat structure. Consider a thin dipole with its near λ/2 resonance of 67 . We
calculate equivalent slot impedance from Eq. (5-8):
The λ/2 dipole is inductive when it is longer than a resonant length, whereas the slot
is capacitive.
where f is the focal length, D the diameter, ρ the distance from the focus to the
reflector, and ψ the feed angle from the negative z-axis. The reflector depth from the
rim to the center is z0 = D2/16f .
We eliminate the dimensions of the reflector by using the ratio f /D. The half
subtended angle of the reflector, ψ0, relates to f/D by
Scale 8-1 computes the total feed subtended angle from reflector f/D. When we
place the aperture plane at the focus, the ray path distance becomes
The normal unit vector at a point on the reflector (r, z) is found from the feed angle:
At this point we need the radius of curvatures in the principal planes to apply Eq. (2-
77) reflection from a curved surface: R1 in the r –z plane and R2 in the φ–z plane:
The spherical wave spreads from the feed as 1/ρ. At the surface of the reflector the
wave curvature changes to a plane wave and propagates to the aperture plane at a
constant amplitude. The spherical wave spreading multiplies the feed distribution by
[Eq. (8-1)] cos2(ψ/2) in the aperture. Then
Deeper reflectors (smaller f/D) have greater edge tapers than shallow reflectors
(larger f/D). Scale 8-2 provides a quick calculation of the added edge taper due to
spherical wave spreading. The reflector beamwidth is given by
HPBW = 70◦ λ/D for a parabolic reflector. An integration of the aperture distribution
for the far-field pattern gives the following results:
The feed receives some of its transmitted power because it reflects from the
parabola and returns as a mismatch at the feed terminals. We calculate the reflected
field at the feed by using surface currents and the magnetic vector potential. The
only significant contribution comes from areas near where the normal of the reflector
points at the feed. Around every other point, the phase of the reflection varies rapidly
and cancels and we need to consider only points of stationary phase. We calculate
the reflection from each point of stationary phase
where is the reflection coefficient, ρ0 the distance to the stationary phase point, Gf
(ρ0) the feed gain in the direction of ρ0, and ρ1 and ρ2 the radiuses of curvature of
the reflector at ρ0. The vertex is the only point of stationary phase on a paraboloidal
reflector: ρ1 = ρ2 = −2f and ρ0 = f . Equation above reduces to
and calculate V versus f /D for feeds with 10-dB beamwidths equal to the reflector
subtended angle. Higher reflector f /D values produce larger feed reflections, since
the feed gain increases faster than the reduced area of the reflector seen from the
feed.
FRONT-TO-BACK RATIO
Figure 2-9 illustrates the pattern response of a paraboloidal reflector and shows that
the pattern behind the reflector peaks along the axis. The diffractions from all points
along the rim add in-phase along the axis and produce a pattern peak. We can
reduce this rim diffraction by using a rolled, serrated, or castellated edge to reduce
diffraction. An absorber-lined cylindrical shroud extending out to enclose the feed
will greatly reduce back radiation, including spillover, and allows the close spacing of
terrestrial microwave antennas with reduced crosstalk.
For a normal truncated circular reflector rim, the following equation estimates the
front-to-back ratio given the reflector gain G, the feed taper T , and feed gain Gf
OFFSET-FED REFLECTOR
Moving the feed out of the aperture eliminates some of the problems with
axisymmetrical reflectors. Blockage losses and diffraction-caused sidelobes and
cross-polarization disappear. We can increase the size of the feed structure and
include more if not all of the receiver with the feed. For example, the reflector may
be deployed from a satellite, with the feed mounted on the main satellite body.
Figure 8-7 shows the offset-fed reflector geometry. We form the reflector out of a
piece of a larger paraboloid. Every piece of the paraboloidal reflector converts
spherical waves from the focus into a plane wave moving parallel with its axis. We
point the feed toward the center of the reflector to reduce the spillover, but we still
locate the feed phase center at the focus of the reflector. The aperture plane
projects to a circle, although the rim shape is an ellipse. ψ0 is the angle from the
axis of the parabola to
the center of the cone of the reflector, and the reflector subtends an angle 2ψe
about this centerline. Given the aperture plane diameter D and the height H of the
center, we find the lower rim offset D = H − D/2. From these parameters we
determine the angle of the center of the rim cone from the z-axis:
We direct the feed an angle ψf from the z-axis to the center of the projected
diameter different from the angle ψ0 of the rim cone axis:
The rim is an ellipse in this plane with major and minor axes given by
To align the reflector, we use the angle of the reflector rim major axis ψc = sin−1
(D/L) with respect to the z-axis and the radial distances from the lower and upper
edges of the reflector in the offset plane, since the center offset H is not a
distinguishable point:
We analyze the offset reflector with the same tools as those used with the
axisymmetric reflector: aperture field, physical optics, and GTD. The asymmetry of
the reflector to feed geometry introduces anomalies. Huygens sources no longer
eliminate crosspolarization, because the source must be tilted. Symmetry prevents
cross-polarization in the plane containing the x-axis (Figure 8-8), but cross-
polarization for linear polarization increases in the plane containing the y-axis
(symmetry plane) as f /D decreases
i) Feed Blockage
The increased effective focal length requires feeds with narrow beamwidths, and we
can no longer consider the feed as a point source. It projects a shadow into the
center of the reflector (Figure 8-15) and causes a central blockage. The subreflector
also blocks the center. As we reduce the subreflector diameter to reduce blockage,
the feed antenna moves closer to the subreflector and its projected shadow
increases. The optimum occurs when the projected feed blockage diameter equals
the subreflector diameter.
The feed size depends on the frequency of operation and the effective f/D value,
whereas the subreflector diameter depends only on geometry. We cannot determine
the optimum independent of frequency.
SPHERICAL REFLECTOR
The reflector can be fed from a point source for large f /D by assuming that it is a
distorted parabola [55,56]. It can be fed with a line source to follow the axis fields.
Corrector subreflectors can be designed to correct the spherical aberrations [58].
Like the parabolic reflector, we can design arrays [24] to compensate for spherical
aberrations and give multiple beams. Figure 8-23 shows the geometry and ray
tracing of a spherical reflector illuminated by a plane wave. All rays intersect a radial
line of the sphere (the axis) in the direction of the incident wave because the
reflector has circular symmetry about all axes. The diagram traces rays hitting the
outer portion of the reflector as passing through the axis closer to the vertex than do
the rays reflected from areas closer to the axis. The reflector has a line focus. A
distorted paraboloidal reflector with a line focus exhibits spherical aberration
because the focal length depends on the radial distance from the axis of the
reflection point. The spherical reflector has a cusplike caustic where GO
predicts infinite fields. The second side of Figure 8-23 traces a single ray. We can
easily solve the isosceles triangle for the results:
As H approaches zero, with rays near the axis, the reflected ray passes through the
paraxial focus (z = R/2). We use Eq. (8-89) to find the power distribution on the axis
by using the conservation of power. The power in a differential area of the plane
wave reflects into a differential length on the axis: dA = 2πH dH. We differentiate Eq.
(8-89) implicitly:
where P0 is the power at the paraxial focus. The peak power occurs at the paraxial
focus and drops by one-eighth (−9 dB) at the vertex. We determine the required
length of the line source feed from the rotation angle ψ of the illuminated portion of
the reflector:
where H is the substrate thickness, W the patch nonresonant width, and εeff the
effective dielectric constant of a microstrip transmission line the same width as the
patch.
The impedance varies from zero in the center to the edge resistance approximately
as
where Ri is the input resistance, Re the input resistance at the edge, and x the
distance from the patch center. The feed location does not significantly affect the
resonant frequency. By using Eq. (6-22), we locate the feed point given the desired
input impedance:
The feed pin currents add to the pattern by radiating a monopole pattern. Figure 6-
10 shows this radiation for a patch using a free-space substrate where the E-plane
radiating edges are spaced λ/2. The pattern of Figure 6-10 has a null along the
ground plane in the E-plane, but the monopole radiation increases the radiation
along the ground plane. On one side the radiation adds and on the other it subtracts
from the E-plane pattern to form a null tilted above the ground plane. The H-plane
pattern now contains crosspolarization. We can reduce the monopole radiation by
feeding the patch at a second port located an equal distance from the center on the
opposite side. This requires an external feed network that divides the power equally
between the two ports with a 180◦ phase difference. The problem with this feed
arrangement is that significant power is coupled between the two feeds in the
equivalent microwave circuit of the patch. The estimated value of −6 dB coupling
between the ports causes a portion of the input power to be dissipated in the second
port. At this level the patch efficiency drops 1.25 dB. We can reduce the monopole
radiation by coupling to a second short-circuited probe to the patch instead of
directly feeding it. The gap between the second probe and the patch is adjusted until
the antenna radiates minimum cross-polarization in the H-plane.
This uses the microstrip patch as the feed network, and the second probe has no
resistive load to dissipate power.
The feed probe across the microstrip patch substrate is a series inductor at the
input. Higher-order modes excited in the patch by this feeding method add to the
inductive component of the antenna.
Below resonance, the antenna is inductive and has nearzero resistance. As the
frequency increases, the inductance and resistance grow as the parallel resonance
is approached. Above the resonant frequency, the antenna is capacitive as the
impedance sweeps clockwise around the Smith chart (Figure 6-11) and finally back
to a slight inductive component near a short circuit.
Unit-3
Antenna Arrays
Part-A
Part-B
1. Derive the expression for pattern maxima, minima and half power beam
width for broadside array. (8M) [CO3-H1- Nov/Dec 2011, April/May 2012]
Elements are equally spaced and fed with a current of equal magnitude and all in
same phase. The advantage of this feed technique is that array fires in broad
side direction (i.e. perpendicular to the line of array axis, where there are
maximum radiation and small radiation in other direction). Hence the radiation
pattern of broadside array is bidirectional and the array radiates equally well in
either direction of maximum radiation. In Fig. 1 the elements are arranged in
horizontal plane with spacing between elements and radiation is perpendicular to
the plane of array (i.e. normal to plane of paper.) They may also be arranged in
vertical and in this case radiation will be horizontal. Thus, it can be said that
broadside array is a geometrical arrangement of elements in which the direction
of maximum radiation is perpendicular to the array axis and to the plane
containing the array clement. Radiation pattern of a broad side array is shown in
Fig. 2. The bidirectional pattern of broadside array can be converted into
unidirectional by placing an identical array behind this array at distance of λ/4 fed
by current leading in phase by 900.
Maxima direction
Let spacing between the two point sources be λ/2. Then we can write,
If n = 0, then
Minima direction
When the power is half, the voltage or current is 1/√2 times the maximum value.
The field pattern drawn with E T against ʋ for d=λ/2, then the pattern is bidirectional
as shown in Fig 6. The field pattern obtained is bidirectional and it is a figure of
eight.
If this pattern is rotated by 3600 about axis, it will represent three dimensional
doughnut shaped space pattern. This is the simplest type of broadside array of two
point sources and it is called Broadside couplet as two radiations of point sources
are in phase.
Fig. 6 Field pattern for two point source with spacing d=λ/2 and fed with
currents equal in magnitude and phase.
2. Derive the expression for pattern maxima, minima and half power beam
width for endfire array. (8M) [CO3-H1- April/May 2012]
The end fire array is very much similar to the broadside array from the point of
view of arrangement. But the main difference is in the direction of maximum
radiation. In broadside array, the direction of the maximum radiation is
perpendicular to the axis of array; while in the end fire array, the direction of the
maximum radiation is along the axis of array.
Thus in the end fire array number of identical antennas are spaced equally along a
line. All the antennas are fed individually with currents of equal magnitudes but their
phases vary progressively along the line to get entire arrangement unidirectional
finally. i.e. maximum radiation along the axis of array.
Thus end fire array can be defined as an array with direction of maximum radiation
coincides with the direction of the axis of array to get unidirectional radiation.
Consider two point sources separated by distance d and supplied with currents
equal in magnitude but opposite in phase. Consider Fig. 5 all the conditions are
exactly same except the phase of the currents is opposite i.e. 180°. With this
condition, the total field at far point P is given by,
Assuming equal magnitudes of currents, the fields at point P due to the point
sources A 1 and A 2 can be written as,
By trigonometry identity,
Now as the condition for two point sources with currents in phase and out of phase
is exactly same, the phase angle can be written as previous case.
Maxima direction
From equation (7), the total field is maximum when is maximum i.e. ±1
as the maximum value of sine of angle is ±1. Hence condition for maxima is given
by,
Let the spacing between two isotropic point sources be equal to d=λ/2
Minima direction
If n = 0, then
When the power is half of maximum value, the voltage or current equals to 1/√2
times the respective maximum value. Hence the condition for the half power point
can be obtained from equation (7) as,
Thus from the conditions of maxima, minima and half power points, the field pattern
can be drawn as shown in the Fig. 7.
Fig. 7 Field pattern for two point sources with spacing d = d=λ/2 and fed
with currents equal in magnitude but out of phase by 1800.
As compared with the field pattern for two point sources with inphase currents, the
maxima have shifted by 90° along X-axis in case of out-phase currents in two point
source array. Thus the maxima are along the axis of the array or along the line
joining two point sources. In first case, we have obtained vertical figure of eight. Now
in above case, we have obtained horizontal figure of eight. As the maximum field is
along the line joining the two point sources, this is the simple type of the end fire
array.
3. Derive the expression for array factor of N-element linear array (8M)
The total resultant field at the distant point P is obtained by adding the fields due to n
individual sources vectorically. Hence we can write,
Note that ʋ= (βdcosʋ + α) indicates the total phase difference of the fields from
adjacent sources calculated at point P. Similarly α is the progressive phase shift
between two adjacent point sources.
The value of α may lie between 00 and 1800. If α = 00 we get n element uniform
linear broadside array. If α = 1800 we get n element uniform linear endfire array.
This equation (4) indicates the resultant field due to n element array at
distant point P. The magnitude of the resultant field is given by,
4. Explain the working principle of BSA along with its properties. (16M)
Consider 'n' number of identical radiators carries currents which are equal in
magnitude and in phase. The identical radiators are equispaced. Hence the
maximum radiation occurs in the directions normal to the line of array. Hence such
an array is known as Uniform broadside array. Consider a broadside array with n
identical radiators as shown in the Fig. 10.
As the distance of separation d between any two array elements is very small as
compared to the radial distances of point P from A 0 , A 1 , ...A n-1 , we can assume r 0 ,
r 1 , ...r n-1 are approximately same.
Now the electric field produced at point P due to an element A 1 will differ in phase
as r 0 and r 1 are not actually same. Hence the electric field due to A 1 is given by,
Exactly on the similar lines we can write the electric field produced at point P due to
an element A 2 as,
Similarly, the electric field produced at point P due to element A n-1 is given by,
The exponential term in equation (7) represents the phase shift. Now considering
magnitudes of the electric fields, we can write,
1. Major lobe
In case of broadside array, the field is maximum in the direction normal to the
axis of the array. Thus the condition for the maximum field at point P is given
by,
Thus from equation (10) and (11) it is clear that, all the field components add
up together to give total field which is ‘n’ times the individual field when ʋ =
900 and 2700.
3. Nulls
The ratio of total electric field to an individual electric field is given by,
λ= wavelength in meter
m= constant= 1, 2 , 3....
maxima.
Also
Hence
But nd≈ (n-1)d if n is very large. This L= (nd) indicates total length of the
array.
6. Directivity
or
Equation (23) indicated array factor, hence we can write electric field due to n
array as
Then,
Let
For large array, n is large hence nβd is also very large (assuming tending to infinity).
Hence rewriting above equation.
By integration formula,
But U max = 1 at ʋ = 90° and substituting value of U 0 from equation (28), we get,
But β= 2π/λ
The total length of the array is given by, L = (n - 1) d ≈ nd, if n is very large.
Hence the directivity can be expressed in terms of the total length of the array
as,
Consider n number of identical radiators supplied with equal current which are not in
phase as shown in the Fig. 11. Assume that there is progressive phase lag of βd
radians in each radiator.
Consider that the current supplied to first element A 0 be I 0 . Then the current
supplied to A 1 is given by,
Consider that the current supplied to first element A 0 be I 0 . Then the current
supplied to A 1 is given by,
But r 1 = r 0 – dcosʋ
1. Major lobe
For the end fire array where currents supplied to the antennas are equal
in amplitude but the phase changes progressively through array, the
phase angle is given by,
...(9
ʋ = βd(cosʋ -1) )
In case of the end fire array, the condition of principle maxima is given by,
ʋ = = 0 i.e.
3. Nulls
The ratio of total electric field to an individual electric field is given by,
But β= 2π/λ
Note that value of (cosʋ-1) is always less than 1. Hence it is always negative. Hence
only considering -ve values, R.H.S., we get
λ= wavelength in meter
m= constant= 1, 2 , 3....
Consider equation(14),
The directions of the subsidary maxima or side lobes maxima can be obtained if in
equation (8),
Hence sin(nʋ/2), is not considered. Because if nʋ/2=±π/2 then sin nʋ/2 =1 which is
the direction of principle maxima.
Putting
Note that value of (cosʋ-1) is always less than 1. Hence it is always negative. Hence
only considering -ve values, R.H.S., we get
From equation (16) we get,But nd≈ (n-1)d if n is very large. This L= (nd) indicates
total length of the array. So equation (20) becomes,
6. Directivity
The total length of the array is given by, L = (n - 1) d ≈ nd, if n is very large.
Hence the directivity can be expressed in terms of the total length of the array
as,
In order to increase the directivity of an array its total length need to be increased. In
this approach, number of minor lobes appears which are undesired for narrow beam
applications. In has been found that number of minor lobes in the resultant pattern
increases whenever spacing between elements is greater than λ/2.
As per the demand of modern communication where narrow beam (no minor lobes)
is preferred, it is the greatest need to design an array of only main lobes. The ratio of
power density of main lobe to power density of the longest minor lobe is termed side
lobe ratio. A particular technique used to reduce side lobe level is called tapering.
Since currents/amplitude in the sources of a linear array is non-uniform, it is found
that minor lobes can be eliminated if the centre element radiates more strongly than
the other sources. Therefore tapering need to be done from centre to end radiators
of same specifications. The principle of tapering are primarily intended to broadside
array but it is also applicable to end-fire array. Binomial array is a common example
of tapering scheme and it is an array of n-isotropic sources of non-equal amplitudes.
Using principle of pattern multiplication, John Stone first proposed the binomial array
in 1929, where amplitude of the radiating sources arc arranged according to the
binomial expansion. That is. if minor lobes
appearing in the array need to be eliminated, the radiating sources must have
current amplitudes proportional to the coefficient of binomial series, i.e. proportional
to the coefficient of binomial series, i.e.
...(1)
For an array of total length nλ/2, the relative current in the nth element from the one
end is given by
Since in binomial array the elements spacing is less than or equal to the half-wave
length, the HPBW of the array is given by
and directivity
In particular, if identical array of two point sources is superimposed one above other,
then three effective sources with amplitude ratio 1:2:1 results. Similarly, in case
three such elements are superimposed in same fashion, then an array of four
sources is obtained whose current amplitudes are in the ratio of 1:3:3:1.
Fig. 14(a) Radiation pattern of 2-element array with amplitude ratio 1:2:1.
Fig 14(b) Radiation pattern of 3-element array with amplitude ratio 1:3:3:1.
It has also been noticed that binomial array offers single beam radiation at the cost
of directivity, the directivity of binomial array is greater than that of uniform array for
the same length of the array. In other words, in uniform array secondary lobes
appear, but principle lobes are narrower than that of the binomial array.
(a) The side lobes are eliminated but the directivity of array reduced.
(b) As the length of array increases, larger current amplitude ratios are required.
Unit – IV
Special Antennas
Part – A
1.Draw the log periodic dipole antenna structures at UHF & VHF ranges. (or)
Name & Draw a frequency independent antenna. [CO4-L1]
3.What is the need for transposing the lines in log periodic antenna? [CO4-L1]
Transposing lines introduce 1800 phase shift b/w adjacent dipoles.
5. Write the features of log periodic dipole array. [CO4-L2- April/May 2014]
• LPDA excited from the short length dipole side (or) high frequency side.
• For unidirectional LPDA the structure produces backward direction and
forward direction is very small.
7. What is the design ratio & frequency ratio of log periodic antenna? [CO4-H3]
Design ratio or scale factor is given by
t = Rn / Rn+1 = Ln/Ln+1
Frequency ratio or bandwidth:
F = Ln+1/ Ln
11. Differentiate between normal and axial mode of operation in helical antenna.
[CO4-L2- April/May 2015]
14. What is meant by pitch angle in helical antenna? [CO4-L1- Nov/Dec 2014]
The pitch angle is the angle between a line tangent to the helix wire and the plane
normal to the helix axis. α = tan-1 (𝑆𝑆/ 𝜋𝜋𝐷𝐷)
17.What are the two procedures for radiation pattern measurement? [CO4-L2]
• The primary is kept stationary whereas secondary is moved around along a
circular path at a constant radius.
• Both the antennas are kept in fixed positions having a suitable spacing
between them and secondary antenna beam aimed are primary antenna.
• The test area is isolated from interfering signals much better than at outdoor
ranges.
20. What are the requirement of reflectors used in Yagi uda array?
[CO4-L1- April/May 2012, April/May 2014]
Reflector drive its power from a driver, it reduces the signal strength in it’s own
direction thus reflects the radiation towards the driver and directors.
Double minima method is used where the Probe depth does not introduce an
error.
33. Write about near and far field measurement. [CO4-L1- April/May 2013]
• There are three main regions of the radiated field of the antenna. The region
very close to antenna is called as reactive near field region( radiansphere).
• The region next to reactive near field region which is called as radiating near
field region (Fresnal region).
• The region located far away from the antenna is called as far field
region.(fraunhofer region).
35. Compare indoor ranges with outdoor ranges. [CO4-L2- April/May 2012]
Part-B
1. Draw the construction of Helical Antenna & principle of helical antenna with
different modes of operation. How its differ from other antenna. (16M)
HELICAL ANTENNA:
Helical Antenna is a broadband VHF & UHF Antenna used to provide circular
polarization.
Construction:
Radiation Pattern:
= S2 + (πD)2
Pitch angle:
It is the angle between a line tangent to the helix wire and the plane normal to
the helix axis.
tan α = =
α = tan-1
The different radiation characteristics are obtained by changing the above
parameters in relation to wavelength.
A Area of loop =
Far field of the short dipole is given by,
Eф =
Where S = L = Length of dipole
Axial ratio:
Sub A =
AR = Axial ratio
S=
Sub in pitch angle (α),
α=
α= (
This is the condition for pitch angle to get circular polarization.
R= ohms
HPBW = degree
BWFN = degree
D=
AR =
Advantages:
Simple antenna.
Higher directivity.
Mostly circular polarization is obtained.
Broadband bandwidth.
Applications:
Radio astronomy.
Telemetry.
Satellite & space communication.
2. Draw the structure of LPDA & derive the design of LPDA (or) explain the
construction and characteristics features of frequency independent
antenna.(16M)
[CO4-H3- NovDec 2013, Nov/Dec 2014, May/June 2016]
Log periodic dipole antenna (LPDA) (or) High frequency antenna (or)
Frequency independent antenna.
A log periodic antenna is a broadband narrow beam antenna.
It is a frequency independent antenna.
It is defined as the antenna for which the impedance & radiation pattern
remains constant as a function of the frequency.
In order to be frequency independent, the antenna should expand or contract
in proportion to the wavelength.
Construction:
= = = τ
τ Periodicity factor
Working principle:
Active region:
DESIGN OF LPDA:
Design parameters are,
1. Apex angle (α)
2. Design ratio (τ)
3. Spacing factor (σ)
= L n+1 (1 -
2S
2S
= λ (1- )
4S
tan
4σ
τ=
α = 2 tan-1
Characteristics of LPDA:
Features:
LPDA excited from the short length dipole side (or) high
frequency side.
For unidirectional LPDA the structure produces backward
direction and forward direction is very small.
Applications:
SPIRAL ANTENNA:
ln a =
ѳ=
r 2 = Kr 0 a ѳ ( K = a-δ )
r 2 = r 0 a ѳ -δ
Second antenna is obtained by rotating the original antenna by angle δ.
Third antenna is obtained by rotating 1st spiral by 180˚.
r 3 = a ѳ -π
Fourth antenna is obtained by rotating 2nd spiral by 180˚
r 4 = a ѳ -π-δ
Conical spiral antenna is a balanced structure which may be fed at the apex
by means of a balanced transmission line.
Spiral arms are wrapped on the surface of the cone.
Conical angle less than 45˚ is chosen.
It produce unidirectional radiation pattern.
•
• 1˚ antenna is a transmitting antenna.
• 2˚ antenna is a receiving antenna. It is rotated using antenna rotator
mechanics.
• For H-plane pattern measurement, shaft is rotated with both the antennas
vertical.
• For E-plane pattern measurement, shaft is rotated with both the antennas
horizontal. Indicator is used to measure amplitude.
For far field radiation pattern, distance between 1˚ & 2˚ antenna is very large.
For near field radiation pattern, distance between 1˚ & 2˚ antenna is very
smaller.
Distance between 1˚ antenna & 2˚ antenna r 2d2/λ
1˚ antenna should produce wave with uniform amplitude & phase.
Direct rays & indirect rays interferences should be minimized.
Reflection from tall buildings, trees should be minimized.
Measurement of phase:
There are 2 types,
Near field phase pattern measurement.
Far field phase pattern measurement.
GAIN MEASUREMENT:
2 standard methods,
Gain =
Procedure:
Case (i):
P1 = P2 No correction to be applied.
Case (ii):
=P
log =P
G = Gp
Procedure:
GD =
P r - Receiving power.
There are four methods used for measuring the polarization characteristics of
a electromagnetic wave,
4. Power measurement (without phase) method: Some waves may consist of the
superposition of a large number of statistically independent waves of various
polarization.
- In ordinary communication the waves are usually completely polarized but in radio
astronomy the waves from celestial sources, in general partially polarized and in
many cases completely unpolarized.
- The polarization characteristic of wave may be completely determined without any
phase measurements by noting the power response of six antennas: 1. Vertically
polarized (VP), 1 horizontally polarized (HP), 1 linearly polarized (LP) at a slant
angle of + 45’ and 2 circularly polarized (CP) antennas, one right- circularly
polarized (RCP) and the other left- circularly polarized( LCP).
In figure this is the length OP’. If the linearly polarized antenna orientation is
OQ, the response is proportional to the length OQ’.
For the case of linear polarization, the polarization ellipse degenerates to a
straight line and the corresponding polarization pattern is a figure-of-eight as
indicated in figure c.
Thus by this method the polarization ellipse can be drawn and the rotation
direction indicated.
Although such a diagram completely describes the polarization characteristics
of a wave, it is simpler to measure the maximum amplitude A/2 and the
minimum amplitude B/2 and take the ratio of two amplitudes which is the axial
ratio of the polarization ellipse or simply the axial ratio (AR).
The axial ratio is expressed so that it is equal to or greater than unity.
The axial ratio of the polarization ellipse of figure b is given by,
AR= A/B
C) Circular-component method:
In this method 2 circularly polarized antennas of opposite hand are
connected successively to the receiver and the amplitudes E L and E R of
circularly polarized component are measured.
The antennas can consist of two long monofilar axial-mode helical antennas,
one wound left-handed and the other wound right- handed as in figure.
The left- circular component E L of the wave is measured with the switch to
the left as in figure so that the receiver is connected to the left-handed helix.
The right- circular component E R of the wave is measured with the switch
thrown to the right so that the receiver is connected to the right-handed helix.
For positive values of AR the wave is right- elliptical and for negative values it
is left-elliptical.
Thus three measurements E L , E R and δ’ with the helical antennas determine
the polarization characteristics of the received wave completely.
The accuracy depends on the circularity of polarization of the helices. This is
improved ( AR nearer unity) by making the helices long since
The measurements on antenna are carried out in the antenna ranges that are
well equipped for the testing and evaluation of antenna systems.
For measurement of certain antenna, the choice of the best suitable range
types depends on physical size of antenna and the frequency of antenna.
The antenna measurements following types of antenna ranges are practically used:
Anechoic chamber:
It is indoor type of antenna range in which chamber walls, celing, floor are covered
with energy absorbers. It is best suited for small antennas.
GTEM Cell (Gega Hertz TEM Cell): This type of antenna range is hybrid between
TEM cell and anechoic chamber and can be used for wide range of frequencies.
Near field range: It is a small indoor type of range in which only near field
measurements are made. Then using numerical methods, far field measurements
can be determined from near field measurements.
Compact range: In this range, the transmitting antenna feeds paraboloid and the
paraboloid changes the spherical waves into plane waves.
Reflected range: In this the heights of transmitting antenna and AUT are selected
such that a constructive interference at AUT.
Slant range: In this type AUT is placed on a tower at fixed heights while the
transmitting antenna on ground.
Ground range: This is a range in which tall towers are not needed as the
transmitting antenna is placed above surface and acts like mirror.
1. Reflection ranges:
These ranges are of the outdoor type, where the ground acts as a
reflecting surface.
Typically the reflection ranges are used in UHF region for the
measurement of patterns of moderately broad antennas.
The reflection range arrangement is shown below:
If the range surface is irregular or there are objects which cannot be removed
from the site, then the Fresnel zones are achieved over a topographic map of
the range surface and then the specular regions are identified and located
such that from these regions significant reflections occur.
If the range surface is flat, then the diffraction fences are employed to redirect
the reflected signals which are moved away from the test regions.
Along with this the edges of fence should not be straight but serrated. The
serrated fence reduces the effect of diffraction causing increase in the indirect
signal.
3.Slant range:
It is a type of range in which the source antenna is placed close to the
ground and AUT is placed at top of tower along with its positioned.
The orientation of two antennas is such that the beam axis of the source
antenna points towards the centre of test antenna.
The arrangement of slant range is shown below:
For the measurements on highly directive antenna only the main beam
and few side lobes of antenna are required.
This arrangement is useful for some antennas such as satellite antennas
which are required to be protected by a redome housing from
contaminations.
b) INDOOR RANGES:
The room completely lined with such absorbing materials is called anechoic
chamber (no echo chamber).
It is an indoor chamber.
Chamber walls, ceiling & floor are filled with RF energy absorbs except at the
location of transmitting antenna & antenna under test.
Anechoic chamber can be used for far field measurement of small antenna.
Absorbs are used for reducing side lobe & back lobe radiation.
Widely used.
Fig.(a)shows the rectangular chamber. Here the end walls and the center parts
of the sidewalls, floor and ceiling are covered with pyramids.
The other parts are covered with wedges. the antenna are placed on the middle
line of the chamber; the source antenna close to one end wall, the AUT a little
further away from the end wall.
The test zone where the reflections are minimized is called the quiet zone.
The dimensions of the chamber should be such that the angle of incidence on
side walls is less than 60˚.At larger angles, the reflections would be large.
Typically the length to width ratio is 2:1.The source antenna should be chosen so
that its main beam doesn’t illuminate the side walls, ceiling and floor.
The source antenna is close to apex of the tapered section and specular
reflections occur close to the source.
The phase difference of the direct wave and the specular reflections changes
slowly in the quiet zone which result in a more planar wave front than in the
case of rectangular chamber.
The size of the chamber is large since the antennas need to be several
wavelength apart to simulate far field conditions.
Cost is also high because of its large size.
The RF absorbing material typically works well at and above UHF ranges.
Therefore the anechoic chambers are most often used for frequencies above
300MHz.
If the chamber is large ,then the source antenna’s mainlobe is not in view of
the side walls , ceiling of the floor
2. COMPACT RANGES:
Measurement on microwave antenna often require that the radiator
under test be illuminated by a uniform plane wave which is usually
achievable only in the far field regions and involves large distances.
Here the source antenna is used as an offset feed that illuminates a
paraboloid reflector.
This method is based on the characteristics of travelling wave via input impedance
may be uniquely determined from the knowledge of voltage or current minimum and
the reference point at which the impedance is measured.
The antenna impedance is given by,
Reflection coefficient k=
Alternatively k= ; S is VSWR
And Ө = π - 2β d = π as β=
= 180 degrees.
V SWR =
reflected power.
reflection co efficient
Reflected power:
Reflection co efficient:
Ideal condition:
Under this condition, all the powers are accepted by the antenna.
VSWR Measurement:
Case(i):
VSWR(S<10)
This VSWR measurement is one of the important measurement in Mw.
We can determine the impedance at any point in a waveguide.
Note down the reading ,that value is represented to be Vmax. The probe of
the slotted line is adjusted to get the minimum reading in the meter. Hereby ,
we calculate the VSWR as
VSWR=
Limitations:
Case 2:
VSWR(S>10)
Insert the probe depth, where the power is twice the minimum point. that can
be repress by dB in graph.
The probe depth is then moved to twice power point on the other side of
minimum that Point. That can be represented as d2 m the graph.
And from the calculate d ! &d 2 values, the VSWR is calculated.
9.Explain in detail about the Radiation from a travelling wave antenna? (8M)
[CO4-L2-April/May 2012]
The standing waves travel due to reflections in the resonant antenna. But in the
travelling wave antenna, the standing waves do not exist. That means, the
travelling wave antenna is non-resonant type antenna or aperiodic antenna.
In such antennas one of the ends is terminated into the characteristic impedance
Z o while other end is connected to the input signal.
Due to the proper termination at the load, the reflections are avoided. Because of
this the unidirectional radiation pattern is obtained as shown in the Fig.
The angle of major lobe and the amplitude of the major lobe depends on the
length of the wire. As the length of the wire increases, the angle of major lobe with
respect to the axis of wire decreases.
Hence the major lobe comes closer to the axis of wire as the length increases.
Also with the increase in the length, the amplitude increases.
The Table given below indicates different values of angle of major lobe and
amplitude of the lobes for the increasing length.
Advantages:
Standing waves does not exist.
Bandwidth is more.
With increasing length, the major lobes becomes narrower and closer.
Disadvantages:
Large space requirement and not useful at higher frequencies.
Unit-V
Part-A
2. What is the critical frequency of radio wave for reflection at vertical incidence if
the maximum value of electron density in 1.26×106cm-3?
[CO5-H3-April/May2013]
Fc = 9 √ Nm
= 9 √ 1.26*106 cm-3
= 10.1 MHz
3. A pulse of a given frequency transmitted upward is received back after a period
of 5ms. Find virtual height? [CO5-L1]
h’ = CT/2
= (3 × x 5× /2
= 750Km
4. Define skip distance. [CO5-L1- May/June 2012]
The distance with in which a signal of given frequency fails to be reflected
back is the skip distance for that frequency. The higher the frequency the greater the
skip distance.
6. What are the factors that affect the propagation of radio waves? [CO5-L2]
• Curvature of earth.
• Earth’s magnetic field.
• Frequency of the signal.
• Plane earth reflection.
h t = 40m , h r =25m
d max = 4.12 [ ]
= 4.12 [ ]
= 46.6km
8. What are the effects of earth curvature on troposphere propagation? [CO5-L1]
For any layer, the highest frequency that will be reflected back for vertical incidence is
f cr = 90˚ max
f muf = f cr seci
14. Define Fading. List various types of fading? [CO5-L1- April/May 2013]
It is defined as the fluctuations in the received signal strength caused due to
variations in height and density of the ionization in different layers. Types of fading
are,
(i) Selective fading (ii) interference fading (iii) Absorption fading (iv) polarization
fading
15. Which layer of ionosphere is called as kernelly Heaviside layer & application
layer? [CO5-L1]
E layer.
Fc= 9
Nmax-maximum electron density
20. Calculate MUF for a critical frequency 10 MHz and an angle of incidence
45˚
[CO5-H3- April/May 2015, May/June 2016]
Ans:
f muf = f cr (sec i)
= 10 × sec 45˚) = (1.4142)*(10 × = 14.142 MHz
21. What is the critical frequency for reflection at vertical incidence if the
maximum value of electron density is 1.24 * ?
[CO5-H3- Nov/Dec 2012, April/May 2013, April/May 2014]
Ans: N max = 1.24 * = 1.24 * = 1.24
f cr = = = 10.022 MHZ
22. Find the maximum distance that can be covered by a space wave, when the
antenna heights are 60 m and 120 m [CO5-H1- May/June- 2013]
Ans: Let the heights of transmitting and receiving antenna are 60m and 120m
respectively. Then the maximum distance in km covered by a space wave is given by
Part-B
1. Briefly describe the terms related to the sky wave propagation: virtual
heights, critical frequency, maximum usable frequency, skip distance and
fading? (16M) [CO5-L1- May/June 2012, April/May 2014, April/May 2015]
Virtual heights: The virtual height (h) has the great advantage of being easily
measured, and it is very useful in transmission path calculations. For fiat earth
approximation and assuming that ionosphere conditions are symmetrical for incident
and refracted waves, The transmission path distance,
TR=2h/tan β
Critical frequency: When the refractive index, n has decreased to the point where n
= sin φi the angle of refraction φ will be 90° and wave will be travelling horizontally.
The higher point reached by the wave is free. The electron density N at the that
point satisfies the relation
If the electron density at some level in a layer is sufficient great to satisfy the above
condition,then the wave will be returned to earth from that level. If maximum electron
density in a layer is less than n', the wave will penetrate the layer (Though it may be
reflected back from a higher layer for which N is greater). The largest electron
density required for reflection occurs when the angle of incident φi is zero, i.e., for
vertical incidence. For any given layer the highest frequency that will be reflected
back for vertical incidence will be
Where fcr = Critical frequency for the layer Nmax = Maximum ionization density
(electrons per cubic meter). The characteristics of the ionospheric layers are usually
described in terms of their virtual heights and critical frequencies, as these quantities
can be readily measured. The virtual height is the height that would be reached by a
short pulse of energy showing the same time delay as the actual pulse reflected
from the layer travelling with the speed of light. The virtual height is always greater
than the true height of reflection, because the interchange of energy taking place
between the wave and electrons of the ionosphere causes the velocity of
propagation to be reduced. The extent of this difference is influenced, by the
electron distributions in the regions below the level of reflection. It is usually very
small, but on occasions may be as large as 100 Kms or so.
The critical frequency is the highest frequency that is returned by a layer at vertical
incidence. For regular layers,
The critical frequencies of the E and F1 layers primarily depend on the zenith angle
of the sun. It, therefore, follows a regular diurnal cycle, being maximum at noon and
tapering off an either side. The fc of the F2 layer, shows much larger seasonal
variation and also changes more from day to day. It can be seen that the critical
frequencies of the regular layers decrease greatly during night as a result of
recombination in the absence of solar radiation. But the fc of sporadic E shows
regular variation throughout the day and night suggesting that sporadic E is affected
strongly by factors other than solar radiation. There is a long term variation in all
ionospheric characteristics closely associated with the 11 year sunspot cycle. From
the minimum to maximum of the cycle, fc of F2 layer varies from about 6 to 11 MHz
(ratio of 1:1.8), fc of E layer varies from 3.1 to 3.8 MHz (a ratio of mere 1 to 1.2).
Long term predictions of ionospheric characteristics are based on predictions of the
sunspot number. Reliable estimates can be made, for as much as a year, in
advance.
Although the critical frequency for any layer represents the highest frequency that
will be reflected back from that layer at vertical incidence, it is not the highest
frequency that can be reflected from the layer. The highest frequency that can be
reflected depends also upon the angle of incidence, and hence, for a given layer
height, upon the distance between the transmitting and receiving points. The
maximum, frequency that can be reflected back for a given distance of transmission
is called the maximum usable frequency (MUF) for that distance. It is seen that the
MUF is related to the critical frequency and the angle of incidence by the simple
expression
The MUF for a layer is greater than the critical frequency by the factor secφi the
largest angle of incidence φi that can be obtained in F-layer reflection is of the order
of 74°. This occurs for a ray that leaves the earth at the grazing angle. The geometry
for this case is shown below
The MUF at this limiting angle is related to the critical frequency of the layer by
As the medium between the transmitting and receiving antennas plays a significant
role, it is essential to study the medium above the earth, through which the radio
waves propagate. The various regions above the earth's surface are illustrated in
Fig.2.1
The levels, at which the electron density reaches maximum, are called as layers.
The three principal day time maxima are called E, F1, and F2 layers.
In addition to these three regular layers, there is a region (below E) responsible for
much of the day time attenuations of HF radio waves, called D region (ref. Fig. 4a). It
lies between the heights of 50 and 90 Km (ref. Fig. 3). The heights of maximum
density of regular layers E and F1are relatively constant at about 110 Km and
220Km respectively. These have little or no diurnal variation, whereas the F2 layer is
more variable, with heights in the range of 250 to 350 Km.
At night F1 and F2 layers combine to form a single night time F2 layer (Fig. 4b). The
E layer is governed closely by the amount of UV light from the sun and at night
tends to decay uniformly with time. The D layer ionization is largely absent during
night A sporadic E layer is not a thick layer. It is formed without any cause. The
ionization is often present in the region, in addition to the regular E ionization.
Sporadic E exhibits the characteristics of a very thin layer appearing at a height of
about 90 to 130 Kms. Often, it occurs in the form of clouds, varying in size from 1
Km to several 100 Kms across and its occurrence is quite unpredictable. It may be
observed both day and night and its cause is still uncertain.
We have mentioned earlier, that the path of the radio wave is bent by the
ionosphere. Neglecting the effect of the earth's magnetic field and the effect of
energy loss, the refractive index of the ionosphere is given by
This will always show the values of n < 1. Lower the frequency and higher the
electron density, greater is the deviation of the Refractive Index from unity. When f 2
< 81N, n is imaginary, i.e. the ionized region is not able to transmit a wave freely at
such a frequency. Instead, attenuation takes place, analogous to the action of a
waveguide operating beyond cut off
The phase velocity of a wave travelling through the ionosphere behaves in the same
way as the phase velocity of a wave on a transmission line, i.e. the velocity is
inversely proportional to the square root of the dielectric constant.
since n < 1 for an ionized medium, the phase velocity in the ionosphere, is always
greater than V by an amount that is greater, larger the quantity .
As a result, when a wave enters the ionosphere, the edge of the wave front in the
region of the highest electron density will advance faster than the part of the
waveforms encountering regions of lower electron density. Accordingly, the path of
the wave is bent in the ionosphere as illustrated in Fig. 6. This bending of the wave
follows ordinary optical laws. The direction, in which a wave travels at P, in the
ionosphere, is given by Snell's Law.
Where
θ1 = angle of incidence
θ2 = angle of refraction
Here, it is assumed that below the ionosphere, where the direction of travel is given
by φ0 ,n =1
The top Pm of the path corresponds to φ= 90° and occurs at a point in the
ionosphere where
4.Explain briefly about ground wave propagation with neat sketch ? (8M)
The ground wave is a wave that is guided along the surface of the earth just as an
electromagnetic wave is guided by a wave guide or transmission line. This ground
wave propagation takes place around the curvature of the earth in the frequency
bands up to 2 MHz This also called as surface wave propagation.
The ground wave is vertically polarized, as any horizontal component of the E field
in contact with the earth is short-circuited by it. In this mode, the wave glides over
the surface of the earth and induces charges in the earth which travel with the wave,
thus constituting a current, (see Fig. 4.1). While carrying this current, the earth acts
as a leaky capacitor. Hence it can be represented by a resistance or conductance
shunted by a capacitive reactance.
As the ground wave passes over the surface of the earth, it is weakened due to the
absorption of its energy by the earth. The energy loss is due to the induced current
flowing through the earth's resistance and is replenished partly, by the downward
diffraction of additional energy, from the portions of the wave in the immediate
vicinity of the earth's surface.
Characteristics of F1 Layer:
1. F1 layer is the lower end region of F-layer and which will be situated at an
average height of 220 km. (generally, 140 km to 250 km).
2 . The behavior of F1 layer is similar to that of E-region (normal) and obeys the
Chapman's law of variations.
4. The value of electron density varies from 2 x 105 to 4.5 x 105. www.jntuworld.com
6. Maximum HF waves are penetrated through the F1 layer, even though some of
them are reflected back.
8. The density of F1 layer is lowers in winter than summer, even though no great
variations in height.
Characteristics of F2 Layer :
F2 layer is the upper end region of F-layer and which will be situated at a height
range of 250 km to 400 km. Its critical frequency ranges from 5 MHz to 12 MHz
(basically 10 MHz) and may be even more at low altitude stations. The electron
density of F2 layer may varies from 3 x 105 to 2 x 106. Being the upper most
regions, the air density is very low due to which ionization disappears very slowly.
F2 layer is formed by ionization of UV, X-rays and corpuscular radiations.
The earth's magnetic field, atmospheric, ionosphere storms and other geomagnetic
disturbances have large effect on the ionization in F2 layer. This layer does not
follow Chapman's law of variations. This is the most important reflecting medium for
high frequency radio waves.
6. Write a short note on, (a) Selective fading and interference fading (b) Lowest
usable high frequency (c) Field strength calculation for radio AM Broadcast
waves . (16M) [CO5-L1- April/May 2014, April/May 2015]
This type of fading produces serious distortion in modulated signal. Selective fading
is important at higher frequencies. Selective fading generally occurs in amplitude
modulated signals. SSB signals become less distorted compared to the AM signals
due to selective fading.
Interference Fading
The lowest usable frequency can be defined as the maximum value of frequency
necessary to establish (or maintain) point to point communication. As the frequency
decreases, the sensitivity and external noise increases. The lowest usable
frequency (LUF) depends on the transmitted power. Lowest usable frequency is
higher in day time compared to night time depending upon the noise level at the
receiving side, lowest usable frequency is measured. Where, Lowest usable
frequency for sky wave propagation is limited due to:
Ground wave propagation is very useful at lower frequencies between 1 -2 MHz this
mode of propagation exists when the transmitting and receiving antennas ART very
close to the surface of the earth. The genera expression for field strength of ground
wave propagation is given as,
Where
λ = Wavelength (meters)
Is = Current in antenna
The above expression is valid when distance (d) is very small. As the distance
increases, ground attenuation and absorption increases. Field strength of ground
wave propagation according to sommerfield is,
A = Attenuation factor
The value of ground field strength at the surface of earth (Eo) depends upon, (i)
Directivity of planes which are vertical and horizontal. (ii) Power radiation of
transmitting antenna. The field at unit distance (1Km) for a radiated power of 1 kW,
can be calculated as,
Where,
E0 =√90P/d volts/meter
From above, field strength is directly proportional to the square root of the power
radiated. E0= 300 mV/mt. at P = I kW, d = 1 km = 186.45 mV/m at J = 1 mile
This classification is based upon the frequency range, distance and several
other factors.
Applications
Disadvantage
Sky wave propagation suffers, from fading due to reflections from earth surface,
fading can be reduced with the help of diversity reception.
Applications
Applications