Some Clarity On Mutual Fund Fees: Stewart Brown Steven Pomerantz
Some Clarity On Mutual Fund Fees: Stewart Brown Steven Pomerantz
Some Clarity On Mutual Fund Fees: Stewart Brown Steven Pomerantz
Stewart Brown
Steven Pomerantz
The purpose of this Paper is to explore mutual fund fees in depth. Some academic and legal
scholars argue that because mutual fund markets possess some of the indicia of competitive
markets, fees must approximate marginal costs and thus cannot be excessive. Others argue that
structural anomalies in mutual fund governance allow fund managers to overcharge mutual fund
investors. This Paper resolves the disagreement. It resolves the disagreement about competition
in mutual fund “markets” by demonstrating that an important component of fund fees is immune
to the forces of competition. It accomplishes this with a combination of economic and legal
analysis. We study asset and fee levels of the universe of mutual funds between 2005 and
2015.This Paper consists of two intertwined analyses: financial and legal. Both the study and
report showed significant differences between fund advisory fees and fees determined by arm’s
length bargaining and led to the1970 ICA amendments that made fund sponsors fiduciaries with
respect to fund fees. This proposed “solution” had certain face validity.
Department of Management, University of Bologna, Via Capo di Lucca 34, 40126, Bologna,
Italy
Bangor Business School, Bangor University, Hen Goleg, Room
1.07, College Road, LL57 2DG, Bangor, United Kingdom
Department of Finance and Economics, College of Business Administration, University of
Sharjah, P.O. Box 27272, United Arab Emirates
This paper aims to extend this strand of research by analyzing the payout policy of these
institutions. In particular, we empirically investigate the role of ownership structure in shaping
their payout policy, which is largely an overlooked topic in the banking literature in comparison
to the evidence on non-financial firms. Employing a dataset of both Islamic and conventional
financial institutions domiciled in 16 jurisdictions for the period 2000e2015, our main findings
indicate that ownership identity is indeed important for explaining dividend policy in these
banks, albeit in different patterns. Government ownership seems to exert a negative effect on
dividend payouts in both types of financial institutions, which is consistent with the preference of
governments towards bank stability. In the case of family ownership, the impact is negative for
conventional banks but positive for Islamic ones, consistent with agency theory. With respect to
family ownership, the impact is negative for conventional banks but positive for Islamic ones,
consistent with agency theory. These results are to some extent similar in the case of foreign
ownership where it is associated with a higher payout policy in Islamic banks, but not significant
in conventional ones. Our results are robust to an array of additional analyses including
propensity score matching.
This paper is to examine the relation between board independence and board size its effect on
BPD (regional development bank) performance. The sample firm consists all 26’s BPD in
Indonesia in the period 2010 - 2014, we take secondary data from the annual report of each BPD,
total 203 top executives that are a member of the board of commissioners and board of directors
from all BPD in Indonesia. Board independence is independent commissioner in BPD. Board
size is the number of executives sitting both on the board of commissioners and board of
directors. The independent variables are the proportion of independent directors and board size.
A control variable in this study is the size of the company. The statistical method used to test the
hypotheses is OLS regression, this method was used to measure the relationship between board
independence, board size, and BPD performance. The thesis contributes to the literature related
to board independence, board size and firm performance in the regional development banks in
Indonesia. The results suggest that there is a positive relationship between board independence
and board size to BPD performance.
The majority of previous research in the field of board diversity was dedicated to the direct link
between board gender diversity and firm performance. Grounded in Agency- and Resource
dependence theory, this thesis expands on this research and examines the main relationship
including the influence of two additional factors: educational level of female directors and
mandatory board gender quotas. Analyzing a sample of 454 European firms (3,871 firm-year
observations) over the period 2007-2017, a positive relationship between board gender diversity
and firm performance is found. Furthermore, the results suggest that educational levels or board
gender quotas do not affect this relationship. The effects on firm performance differ depending
on whether legislative measures or voluntary initiatives are in place, i.e. in contrast to legislative
quotas, voluntary initiatives enhance firm performance.
Islamic banking has grown phenomenally since the 1970s when the Dubai Islamic bank was first
founded, followed by Kuwait finance house, the Faisal Islamic bank in Egypt, and the Al-Baraka
(El-Gamal,2007; Farag 2016). Islamic banks are different from conventional ones as Islamic law
prohibits the payment or receipt of interest and does not allow investment in in some industries
e.g. tobacco, alcohol etc. The purpose the study is to investigate the influence of the dual board
structure on the financial performance of Islamic bank. This paper also investigates the unique
agency relationships using a sample of 90 Islamic banks across 13 countries over the period 2006-
2014, we find that the greater SSB size the better of the performance of Islamic bank and may
result in lower agency cost. Therefore, larger SSBs may enable Islamic banks to efficiently satisfy
the growing demands for Islamic banking industry worldwide. We find a positive and significant
relationship between banks ‘size and age and both board of directors ‘size and the SSB size. On
the other hand, we find a negative and significant relationship between directors’ private benefits
and the SSB size. Therefore, Islamic banking regulators may encourage and support the
establishment of professional institutions dedicated to training scholars to identify, understand and
verify the authenticity of Shari’ah complaint financial products.
This study explores the determinates of financial performance. The main purpose of this paper is
to investigate how cooperate governance and ownership structure relate to the financial
performance of firm. We estimated this relation by using fuzzy-set qualitative comparative
analysis(fsQCA). The panel data used in this study covered 1207 companies from 59 countries
across 19 sectors for the period 2013 to 2015 with linear and non- linear multiple regression
analysis (MRA). This study uses ROE as a direct measure of financial performance (Bhagat &
Black, 1997). This study makes two important contributions to the business finance literature. First,
it highlights the value of using multiple empirical techniques to increase the robustness of results.
The results suggest that non-linear techniques (Poisson regression) and fsQCA provide deeper
empirical insight. While regression analysis (OLS or Poisson) offers unidirectional averages,
fsQCA highlights an additional path to increase returns even with high ownership dispersion. The
use of both methods is useful for understanding complex relationships. Second, we report
interesting findings for academics and practitioners. This study was based on agency theory, which
provides the theoretical foundations that we used to study the link between corporate governance
and financial performance.
The board of directors is one form of internal control mechanisms in corporate since the board
members appoint, supervise and remunerate top managers in organizations in addition to strategy
formulation. The purpose of the study is to investigate the relationship between the boards’ size,
board independence, CEO duality, CEO tenure and gender diversity and tow measurement of
performance in listed companies in CAC 40 for the period of 2011–2013. We found evidence
provide that board characteristics are positively correlated to the firm’ performance. The
stewardship theory assumption, the CEO duality is very high and is significantly associated with
a higher level of firm performance. Our results suggest a constant negative relation between firm
performance and CEO’s tenure. The subject of women on boards of directors is a growing area of
research. Carter et al. (2003) and Erhardt et al. (2003) find a positive association between the
percentage of women on board and firm value. Nielsen and Hues (2010) also find a positive
relationship between women on board and the board’s strategic control. . Carter et al. (2010) find
no significant association between gender type and firm performance.
The board of directors is the key element of corporate governance, its composition must be
responsive to the basic functions that are assigned to it: supervising and monitoring, avoiding
opportunistic behavior on the part of executives, and providing advice to decision makers to
improve the management of the business. The purpose of the paper is to analyses the structure of
boards of directors and its impact on business performance, which is approximated by economic
profitability and the Tobin’s Q ratio. In this paper we focus on three basic aspects of boards that
have been reviewed in the recent reform of the Good Governance Code: the size of boards, their
independence and their diversity. In Spain, until 2013, there were a series of recommendations on
corporate governance set out in the Unified Good Governance Code approved by the Spanish
Securities Market Commission (Comisión Nacional del Mercado de Valores, C.N.M.V.) in 2006.
With respect to the performance of the company, we note that there is a negative and significant
relationship with the independence of boards. However, the results are sensitive to the performance
measure employed.
In Taiwan, corporate governance became a major and controversial issue only at the beginning of
the twenty-first century when the Taiwanese authorities started to introduce and implement a series
of corporate governance reforms. The main aim of this paper is to empirically assess the effects of
ownership structure, board of directors on firm value. This study examines the effects of corporate
governance mechanisms on firm performance in a newly industrialized country, Taiwan. Using a sample
of Taiwanese listed firms from 1997 to 2015, this study uses a panel estimation to exploit both the
cross-section and time–series nature of the data. Furthermore, two stage least squares (2SLS)
regression model is used as robustness test to mitigate the endogeneity issue between corporate
governance and firm performance. In Western developed countries that show no linkage between
independent directors and firm performance, our findings indicate that for both accounting-based
measures and market-based measures, board independence has a significant and positive effect on
firm performance in our study on Taiwanese firms. Empirical results on the impact of independent
boards on firm performance in developed markets such as the UK, the findings of the current study,
which show a significantly positive association between appointment of independent directors and
firm performance Therefore, the corporate governance reform regarding the independent director
system which is mandatory for newly listed companies is a successful policy in Taiwan.
Canadian Foundation for Advancement of Investor Rights (FAIR Canada) in a recent open letter
(Pascutto, 2011) to the Canadian Finance Minister, James M. Flaherty, wrote “FAIR Canada urges
you to include (in the Senate National Finance Committee) an examination of the high cost of
owning mutual funds for Canadians compared to Americans. Canadians have a significant amount
of their wealth invested in mutual funds and similar financial products, with approximately $620
billion invested in mutual funds alone. This paper provides the first empirical analysis on the
impact of governance mechanism and board structure for Canadian mutual funds. While all the
existing studies on mutual fund governance have focused on the impact of various board
characteristics on the effectiveness of governance, the unique Canadian environment provides us
with an opportunity to test and quantify the effectiveness of board of directors as a governance
mechanism. This paper contributes to the existing literature on the effectiveness of the board acting
as an internal governance mechanism for mutual funds. Therefore, Canadian regulators can set
precedence by setting an upper limit on number of board members.
Pakistan is an ideology based Islamic state. The mutual funds market in Pakistan has a small share
in the capital market as made a comparison of the international market. For small investors,
investment opportunities have not been available in the country. The main objective of this paper
is to compare the impact of religious sentiment (religiosity of investors) on the growth of net asset
value of Islamic (interest free) and conventional (interest based) mutual funds’ performance in
Pakistan. In this paper, we use Binary logit model to check the impact of Islamic month of
Ramadhan and other periods of religious sentiment on mutual funds’ performance in Pakistan. In
case of Islamic mutual fund, Net asset value of the mutual fund decreases in the months of higher
religious sentiment and activities like Ramadhan, ‘Eid’s and Hajj. And in the case of conventional
mutual fund, there is phenomenal increase observed in the net asset value in the month of higher
religious sentiments. Results of the study indicate that the Islamic calendar has significant impact
on the performance of the mutual funds.
Mutual fund is an organization where small investors pool up their money. In Pakistan Mutual
funds were introduced in 1962, when NIT (National Investment Trust) public offering was carried
out. Mutual fund industry is growing in Pakistan, the role of a fund manager is also gaining
importance. The main purpose of this study is to analyze the manager’s market and volatility
timing ability of Pakistani mutual fund industry. This study uses monthly data of 55 open-end
mutual funds for the period 2007-2014. Treynor and Mazuy (1966) models are used to determine
the market timing volatility and timing skills of fund managers. The results suggest that the mutual
funds perform effectively in timing the market volatility. With superior information, mutual funds
can adjust their investment according to the market condition (Treynor and Mazuy, 1966).
The mutual fund industry has grown substantially in many countries since the 1990s. In this paper,
we draw on a dynamic set of measures for socio-cultural values to explain the differential
development of mutual funds across the world. This paper studies the effect of socio-cultural
values on the size of the mutual fund industry. The socio-cultural determinants of mutual fund
development is the basic contribution of our research paper. Using a sample of 38 countries for
the period 1996–2009, including 22 developed countries and 16 emerging countries. For the period
1996–2009, the average value of the ratios of net total assets to GDP in the US was 68.13%, in
Japan 10.27% and in France 56.97%. In both developed and emerging countries, Socio-cultural
variables such as trust, happiness, freedom of choice, or religious behavior and values are generally
ignored in explaining the development of this important industry. The variable associated with
individuals’ perceptions of the freedom of choice and control over their lives has a positive impact
on the size of this industry. We find the positive relation between individuals’ preference for
private ownership and the development of mutual funds. Moreover, we find a positive correlation
between the age of a country’s mutual fund industry and its size.
Factors Affecting Mutual Fund Performance In Pakistan: Evidence
From Open Ended Mutual Funds
Mutual Fund is the best investment choice for small investors in the modern-day investment
especially for those investors who lack information, skills, or knowledge of investing in capital
market. Mutual Fund plays a key role in the capital market of any country. The first Mutual Fund was
introduced in Netherlands in 1774. The main purpose of this paper is to know the effects of different
determinants which affect the performance of 44 open ended Mutual Fund in Pakistan. Using Panel data
(from 2010 to 2014) of the sample 44 open ended funds the research conducted data analyses by applying
fixed effect- random effect OLS model. The study found that the factors such as fund size, expense ratio,
free management and asset turnover have positive impact on fund return have greater impact on fund
return. Fund managers should maintain a balanced approach in the level of the determinants of the Fund
performance so as to ensure maximization in its return, which will benefit both Mutual Fund managers
and investors
Islamic financial institutions offer a unique set of financial products that are distinct in theory and
practice from conventional finance. It is evident from recent global financial crises that Islamic
financial institutions performed better than their conventional counterparts. This paper aims to
investigate whether the Islamic financial institutions perform better in terms of risk and return as
compared to conventional financial institutions. For make an appropriate comparative study
comprises banks, mutual funds and Modaraba companies from 2006 to 2012. This paper finds no
difference in the performance of Islamic and conventional banks. Islamic mutual funds are found
riskier and provide fewer returns as compared to conventional mutual funds. The study suggests
that Islamic financial institutions need to resolve their liquidity problems, sort out new investment
avenues and focus on developing short financing instruments.
Corporate Governance Culture Transmission in Mutual Funds:
Directors as Vector of Transmission
The mutual fund industry playing a significant role in the economic growth of Pakistan. The
mutual fund industry helps the economy, individual investors and institutional investors.
Independence of the board of directors is always viewed as a tool to mitigate the agency problem
between shareholders and managers of firms. The prime focus of this paper is to investigate the
fund governance in new perspective. New code of corporate governance is implemented in
Pakistan in year 2012. In this paper, we adopt a new method to investigate whether mutual fund
directors transmit the governance culture from firms where they employed to fund where they are
independent or dependent directors. The study finds that independence of directors is essential
element for good governance in Pakistan. Dependent connected directors have a positive sign with
proxy of corporate governance. Furthermore, it is investigated that how females and foreign
director on board of mutual fund effect the culture of corporate governance in the mutual funds.
Moreover, foreign and female directors on board are not helping in promoting a good culture of
corporate governance in the Mutual fund industry.
Mutual Fund is a single portfolio of investments where investors put their money to be managed
by an asset management company on behalf of its many investors. The main functions of mutual
fund is to reduce the unsystematic risk, it is good to let fund managers to do that task and mutual
funds owner must have trust on relying them of doing their job of finding the investment which is
less risky and having appropriate return. Closed Ended fund issues a fixed number of units that are
traded on the stock exchange. The focus of this study is on the performance evaluation of the
closed ended mutual funds in Pakistan. In this paper, data that has been used is from Jan 2009 to
June 2013. Sharpe ratio, Treynor ratio, Sortino ratio, Information ratio, Jensen alpha these ratios
are used to rank the performances of the funds. The different investors in the secondary markets.
This research concludes the performance and evaluation of only close ended fund and main focus
is laid on closed ended fund and their evaluation in accordance with the Pakistani stock market
and to check whether the performance of closed ended fund is satisfactory or lagging behind.
Wisal Ahmad, Noman Khan, Abid Usman, Fawad Ahmad an Yasir Khalil
The stock market is a marketplace where securities and ownership stakes in organizations and
companies are bought, sold, traded, and issued. Stock market contains a strong connection with
the international and domestic stability of a country. The objectives for the study are to investigate
the impact of recent political incident (sit-in) on stock returns in Pakistan and to investigate which
company’s return are more affected by the recent sit-in event. Using a sample of KSE 100 index
companies from both financial and non-financial sector is selected for the study. This study used
stock return data daily to calculate surplus stock returns. The excess return on a daily basis and
average excess returns are calculated by using Cumulative Excess Returns (CER) model. The
results of the study indicate that AABR and CAABR for market model are statistically significant.
The Results reveal that Karachi stock exchange show inefficient behavior to political event (Sit-
in).
Measure of systemic risk contribution is a difference between systemic risks of the mutual fund sector.
The estimated systemic risk contribution is useful in studying other aspects of mutual fund investment
international. The systemic risk measure can be used to study whether there is a nonlinear relation
between the mutual funds’ performance and their systemic risk contribution. This paper provides new
evidence of systemic risk contribution in the international mutual fund sector from 2000–2011. Analysis
of 10,570 funds tracks the systemic risk of the global mutual fund sector that can increase from financial
distress at the fund level. The size of the mutual fund drives systemic risk contribution, the effect may be
more than proportionally larger for systemically important funds, especially during panic periods in the
financial markets. . The result suggest that the systemic risk contributions of international mutual funds
are more than proportional given the fund’s size.
This study investigates the risk and return characteristics of Islamic funds in comparison with
SRI and the conventional open-end mutual funds for the UK, which, having attracted over £11.7
billion in Islamic investment in the past decade has emerged as the largest financial market for
Islamic funds in the west. An important idea is that a comparative study of Islamic, SRI and
conventional funds in a financial market where investors’ decision making is independent of
religious influence, would give us important insights into the performance of these types of funds
in comparison to each other and this study was envisaged to achieve the same. Our results
provide contributions to the existing literature that has compared the performance of
conventional funds with that of Islamic funds or with that of SRI funds; but has remained largely
inconclusive. This study represents one of the latest attempt to consider SRI and Islamic funds as
two distinct funds types and then compares them with dominant conventional funds. Concluding
our study, future research is encouraged regarding the UK market for Islamic finance including
but not limited to the in-depth analysis of mutual funds using quantile regression which might
make a distinction among the funds and separate the performance of winners from losers and/or
best from worst etc and could also account for the issue of management fee, which may support
or challenge the results of our study. This was also substantiated by our findings on investment
behavior of these funds.
The objective of this paper is to measure the value added of mutual funds. In this paper they
reconsider whether or not mutual fund managers are skilled. They discover that the average
mutual fund has added value by extracting about $3.2 million a year from financial markets. .
Most important, cross sectional differences in value added are determined for as long as ten
years. They find it hard to reconcile their findings with anything other than the existence of
money management skill. Higher skilled managers manage larger funds and reap higher rewards.
The paper clarifies the role of the traditional measures that exist in the literature. In this paper,
they find that the average abnormal return to investors is close to zero. Further, they find little
evidence that investors can generate a positive net alpha by investing with the best funds.
The performance of portfolio managers depends on market timing, volatility timing, and security
selection. .They compare the performance of our selectivity measure with the currently most
popular holdings-based selectivity measure, the measure of Daniel, Grinblatt, Titman, and
Wermers (1997) They develop holdings-based performance measures that adjust for risk using
stochastic discount factors, display all three components in a consistent framework, and avoid
strong assumptions about managers’ behavior. Previous models leave out some of the
components of performance, and correcting for this they deliver better measures of Selectivity.
Sorting stocks held by funds on selectivity produces a quintile spread in four- factor alphas
greater than 2.5% per year before costs and more than 1.7% greater than found using the Daniel,
Grinblatt, Titman, and Wermers (1997) measure. They further illustrate the usefulness of our
approach using versions of the measures for conditional performance analyses. They find that
total performance, driven entirely by the ability to time market factor levels, is weaker when an
investor sentiment measure is high and stronger when it is low. This is consistent with a delete-
rious impact of exogenous fund inflows on performance but is not fully explained by flows.
This paper studies the performance of U.S. bond mutual funds using measures constructed from
a novel data set of portfolio weights. Using a sample of almost 1000 funds for the period 1997–
2006, this paper provides evidence that bond funds engage in active strategies. Active bond fund
manager’s trade frequently and considerably more than managers of index funds. Whereas the
traditional alpha is significantly negative, the net RG measure (after expenses and transaction
costs) is close to zero and becomes positive (although not statistically significant) for some
subgroups of funds such as high-yield, corporate bond general, and multi-sector funds. One
performance measure based on portfolio holdings predicts future fund performance and provides
information not contained in the standard measures. These results provide the first evidence of
the value of active management in bond mutual funds. This paper provides a more optimistic
picture of the value of active management in the fixed-income market relative to the approaches
used in the existing bond fund literature. Using holdings information to measure fund
performance complements what is captured by the returns-based approach providing a more
complete picture of the performance. For an investor it can be important to use the RG measure
to predict future bond fund performance since it provides a more precise signal than Jensen's
alpha.
They studied the relative risk-adjusted returns and downside risk performance of precious-metal
mutual funds (PMFs) in different uncertainty periods (pre-crisis, crisis and post-crisis) using
propensity score matching techniques and difference-in-differences matching regression. They
examined the performance of those funds using sample for the period 9 January 2005 to 13 June
2015, divided into three sub-periods according to uncertainty level. They found that the relative
performance of PMFs differed across uncertainty periods. Thus, they performed similarly to
corporate funds in the pre-crisis period, they outperformed corporate funds regarding risk-
adjusted returns but underperformed in terms of downside risk in the crisis period and they
displayed a similar risk-return performance to corporate funds in the post-crisis period.
Difference-in-difference estimates indicated, furthermore, that fluctuations in uncertainty are
critical to PMF risk-adjusted returns, which improve in high-uncertainty scenarios and
deteriorate in low-uncertainty scenarios. Difference-in-difference estimates also point to the
limited ability of PMFs to safeguard investors from downside risk. This kind of screening is
beneficial for returns in periods of high uncertainty but has a discouraging side effect in terms of
downside risks. This evidence — of especial interest to investors who seek to gain exposure to
precious metals using PMFs is consistent with the idea that PMFs are good diversifiers but poor
safe havens. Whereas this benefit dissipated when doubt was reduced. However, fluctuations in
uncertainty had mixed effects on the relative downside risk associated with PMFs. This proof has
implications for investors who seek to gain experience to priceless metals using PMFs.
While most mutual fund studies implicitly assume a homogeneous product market serving
homogeneous investors, we demonstrate that the retail mutual fund market is more accurately
described as a segmented market catering to two distinct types of investors. One segment serves self-
directed investors focused on maximizing after-fee, risk-adjusted performance, while the other segment
caters to investors who are uncomfortable making investment decisions without the advice of their
broker These findings underscore the need for researchers to take mutual fund incentives into account
when studying mutual fund performance. In particular, estimates based on the full cross-section of
mutual funds may lead researchers to overstate both the efficiency of financial markets and the
deadweight costs of active management. In addition, because direct-sold funds have the strongest
incentive to hire and incentivize skilled managers, tests for manager skill will be most powerful when
they focus on the direct-sold segment. However, given the discomfort that many investors reportedly
face making financial decisions and bearing risk, it is unclear whether clients would be better off
investing without their brokers. Regardless, our findings imply that the demand for investment advice
from brokers is being transformed into demand for underperforming actively managed funds. Gaining a
more complete understanding of investor welfare under different models of broker compensation is an
important goal for future research.
This paper demonstrates that the ability of fund managers to create value depends on market
liquidity conditions, which in turn introduces a liquidity risk exposure (beta) for skilled managers
This paper studies the implications of liquidity risk on the cross section of mutual funds—an
asset class with a combined $30 trillion under management globally (ICI 2014). We find that
high liquidity beta funds outperform low liquidity beta funds by 3.4% (a Carhart four-factor
alpha) annually in the equity fund universe and 4% (an alpha adjusted by Carhart four factors
and two fixed-income factors) in the entire fund universe over the period 1983–2014. The main
contribution of this paper is to advance two important channels through which fund liquidity beta
can affect fund alpha. .Instead, our results indicate that the ability of skilled fund managers to
generate alphas from mispricing depends at least partly on market liquidity conditions. This
dependence leads to economically meaningful cross-sectional differences in fund liquidity risk
exposures, which furthers our understanding of the relation between market liquidity and
informed trading, as well as the predictability of performance in the cross section of mutual
funds.
This paper is concerned with gender differences in the mutual fund industry and the resulting
consequences for investors and fund families. , we find that women take less unsystematic risk
and less small firm risk, while overall return risk does not differ systematically. The significantly
higher idiosyncratic risk of male fund managers we document hints at more active trading
strategies as compared to female fund managers. This reasoning is confirmed by our examination
of investment styles. Woman follow significantly less extreme investment styles, as reflected by
factor loadings closer to the average fund in their respective segment than those of male
managers. Given the comparable performance of female and male managers, the strong negative
flow effect raises the provocative question, why fund families employ women at all for the
management of their funds. We argue that not employing women entails the threat of being sued
for discrimination. We do indeed find that those firms most likely to be sued, i.e. large and well-
established fund companies, are also most likely to employ women. One possible implication of
our study is that fund companies should be more concerned about investor education. In the case
of male-managed funds they might end up with a fund that shows style characteristics that are
quite different 41 from what they were expecting. Consequently, this fund does not fit into the
investor’s fund portfolio anymore which eventually leads to a suboptimal performance.