Europe's Journal of Psychology

ejop.psychopen.eu | 1841-0413

Research Reports

How Positivity Links With Job Satisfaction: Preliminary Findings on the

Mediating Role of Work-Life Balance
a a
Hod Orkibi* , Yaron Ilan Brandt
[a] Graduate School of Creative Arts Therapies, University of Haifa, Haifa, Israel.

Abstract
The positive characteristics that can help people juggle their work and personal roles and experience greater job satisfaction are attracting
increased research attention. This study presents a conceptual model to account for the association between employees’ positive orientation
(i.e., the tendency to evaluate self, life, and the future in a positive way) and their job satisfaction (N = 108). As theorized, the results indicate
that employees’ ability to manage their work-life balance fully mediates the relation between their positive orientation and job satisfaction.
This suggests that a positive orientation serves as an adaptive personal resource that can facilitate employees’ ability to balance work and
non-work demands and hence can foster job satisfaction. The practical implications for positive psychological interventions in organizational
settings are discussed.

Keywords: work-life balance, positive psychology, job satisfaction, positivity

Europe's Journal of Psychology, 2015, Vol. 11(3), 406–418, doi:10.5964/ejop.v11i3.869

Received: 2014-09-24. Accepted: 2015-05-20. Published (VoR): 2015-08-20.
Handling Editors: Vlad Glăveanu, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark; Maria Kakarika, NEOMA Business School, Reims, France
*Corresponding author at: Graduate School of Creative Arts Therapies, University of Haifa, 199 Aba Khoushy Av. Mount Carmel, Haifa 31905, Israel.
E-mail: [email protected]
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License
(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the
original work is properly cited.

Most employees face the challenge of balancing work and personal demands (Baltes, Clark, & Chakrabarti, 2010)
to sustain efficiency in both domains and to protect their well-being (Linley, Harrington, & Garcea, 2010; Lunau,
Bambra, Eikemo, van der Wel, & Dragano, 2014). It comes as no surprise that increasing attention has been paid
to individual factors associated with positive outcomes in work and personal life, including people's self-esteem,
life satisfaction, and optimism. Although these three factors are highly and positively correlated, most studies have
focused on the association of each with specific outcomes.

For example, high self-esteem, which refers to how people regard and accept themselves (Harter, 1993), has
been associated with more effective coping approaches and persistence when facing problems and difficulties
(Kernis, 2003), and with having a greater sense of control over life events (Tedeschi & Norman, 1985). Life satis-
faction, which refers to an overall evaluation of one’s life as satisfying (Diener, Emmons, Larsen, & Griffin, 1985),
has been associated with positive coping strategies (Jones, Rapport, Hanks, Lichtenberg, & Telmet, 2003), internal
locus of control (Yeung & Chow, 2000), and better mental and physical health (Siahpush, Spittal, & Singh, 2008).
Likewise, optimism, which refers to individuals’ general expectations to experience more good than bad things in
Orkibi & Brandt 407

their future, has been associated with desirable outcomes and health through active and effective coping in the
face of hardships (Rasmussen, Wrosch, Scheier, & Carver, 2006; Scheier & Carver, 2003).

Nevertheless, an accumulating body of research suggests that self-esteem, life satisfaction, and optimism are at
the core of a single trait-like construct termed positive orientation (hereafter: positivity); i.e., a basic predisposition
underlying individuals’ evaluations of self, life, and the future in a positive way (Heikamp, Alessandri, Laguna,
Petrovic, Caprara, & Trommsdorff, 2014). The structure of this construct has been supported in studies showing
cross-cultural stability in Western and Asian (i.e., Japan) samples (Caprara, Alessandri, Trommsdorff, Heikamp,
Yamaguchi, & Suzuki, 2012), genetic twin studies (Caprara et al., 2009), and longitudinal studies (Alessandri,
Caprara, & Tisak, 2012a). Furthermore, positivity has predicted outcomes related to personal and interpersonal
adjustment, including high positive affect and low negative affect, better self-reported health and perceived quality
of friendship (Alessandri, Caprara, & Tisak, 2012b). In a work-related study, positive orientation significantly pre-
dicted in-role and extra-role performance (organizational citizenship behaviors) (Alessandri, Vecchione, Tisak,
Deiana, Caria, & Caprara, 2012).

Although the benefits associated with positivity seem clear, the ways in which positivity translates into job-related
outcomes is largely understudied and unknown. Scholars have argued that how positivity relates to job-related
outcomes “represents a critical question since it may lead to more effective interventions and to successful
strategies for employees to fully develop their potentials” (Alessandri, Borgogni, Schaufeli, Caprara, & Consiglio,
2015, p. 2). To address this gap in the literature, this study presents a conceptual model that captures the mech-
anisms through which positivity translates into job satisfaction, which is defined as how individuals feel about their
jobs and different aspects of their jobs, and the extent to which they like (satisfaction) or dislike (dissatisfaction)
their work (Spector, 1997, p. 2). This relationship is particularly important given the strong impact of job satisfaction
on indicators of physical and mental well-being (for a meta-analysis see Faragher, Cass, & Cooper, 2005).

This study also explores how personal resources exert their influence on other resources, which in turn can lead
to more positive and adaptive outcomes (Alessandri et al., 2015; Hobfoll, 2011; Scheier & Carver, 2003). Consistent
with this line of thought, we theorized that positivity (as a personal resource) should be associated with greater
job satisfaction through its influence on individuals’ ability to manage work-life balance, defined as the right com-
bination of participation in paid work and other aspects of one’s life (Hayman, 2005). In the following section, we
present the theoretical lenses that contributed to hypothesis development.

Positivity as an Adaptive Personal Resource

The positive orientation framework addresses positivity directly as a unidimensional construct, rather than indirectly
through other related but distinct constructs such as self-esteem, life satisfaction, and optimism (Caprara, Alessandri,
Trommsdorff, et al., 2012). According to this framework, “viewing oneself, life, and the future under a positive
outlook attests to a basic predisposition that exerts an important biological function in making people prone to
cope with life, despite adversities, failures, and loss” (Alessandri et al., 2015, p. 4). This reasoning is based on
earlier cognitive theories that negative views of the self, the world, and the future characterize depressed individuals
(Beck, 1967), whereas Caprara and colleagues conceptualized a positive orientation as an adaptive propensity
underlying individuals’ positive evaluations towards self, life, and future (Caprara et al., 2009; Caprara, Steca,
Alessandri, Abela, & McWhinnie, 2010).

Europe's Journal of Psychology

2015, Vol. 11(3), 406–418
doi:10.5964/ejop.v11i3.869
Positivity, Work-Life Balance, and Job Satisfaction 408

The model presented here draws on this notion of positivity and two supporting theories. The first is the conservation
of resources theory, which argues that personal resources (e.g., positivity) tend to generate gains in other resources,
which in turn lead to greater well-being (Hobfoll, 1989, 2011). This leads to the supposition that more positive in-
dividuals are better equipped to balance work and non-work demands, such that positivity (as adaptive personal
resource) should lead to greater work-life balance, and hence to greater job satisfaction. The model also draws
on self-regulation of behavior theory according to which individuals who are self-confident and optimistic tend to
expect positive outcomes across various life domains (Carver & Scheier, 1998; Scheier & Carver, 2003). Because
they are confident about their success in the future, these people tend to exert a continuing effort and to succeed
more than individuals who are less confident and optimistic. In addition, these individuals tend to use more highly
active problem-focused coping strategies, and when these are not possible, they turn to adaptive emotion-focused
strategies such as acceptance, humor, and positive reframing (Rasmussen, Wrosch, Scheier, & Carver, 2006).
In contrast, less optimistic individuals tend to experience more doubt, adopt avoidant behavior, and consequently
may give up and experience a sense of failure when trying to reach their goals.

Based on these two complementary theories, we theorized that individuals who are more positive should be more
satisfied with their job, at least partly because they are better able to manage their work-life balance. In other
words, we expected that work-life balance would mediate the relationship between positivity and job satisfaction.

Work-Life Balance as a Mediator

Empirical research has amply documented the direct links between positivity and job-related outcomes but the
specific direct and indirect associations between positivity and job-satisfaction are largely neglected. The concept
of work-life balance focuses on minimizing the tensions between work and other parts of one’s life (Hayman, 2005;
State Services Commission - New Zealand, 2005). This concept contrasts with work-family balance, which refers
to the assessment of whether work and family resources are adequate to meet work and family demands, such
that participation is effective in both domains (Voydanoff, 2005). Work-family conflict refers to incompatibilities
between work and family responsibilities due to limited resources, such as time and energy (Greenhaus & Beutell,
1985). The current study employs the term work-life balance because it is also applicable to single individuals
without a family, whereas the other two terms are, by definition, restricted to individuals with families.

Several studies have suggested that high self-esteem can help employees avoid stress and hardships as well as
cope with challenges at work (Grandey & Cropanzano, 1999; Nikandrou, Panayotopoulou, & Apospori, 2008;
Ruderman, Ohlott, Panzer, & King, 2002). Other studies have found significant associations between life satisfaction
and work-life balance (Allen, Herst, Bruck, & Sutton, 2000; Fisher, 2002) and indicated that optimism helps em-
ployees achieve a better work-life balance (Allen, Johnson, Saboe, Cho, Dumani, & Evans, 2012; Aryee, Srinivas,
& Tan, 2005; Luthans, Avolio, Avey, & Norman, 2007). With respect to the direct link between work-life balance
and job satisfaction, studies have shown that when personal life interferes with work it is negatively linked to job
satisfaction (Thomas & Ganster, 1995) and positively linked to distress at work (Frone, Russell, & Cooper, 1992).
Similarly, when work interferes with personal life it is negatively linked to job satisfaction and other outcomes
(Amstad, Meier, Fasel, Elfering, & Semmer, 2011; Cortese, Colombo, & Ghislieri, 2010).

Only a few studies have examined the role of work-life balance as a mediator, for example, as regards the rela-
tionship between job satisfaction and life satisfaction (Virick, Lilly, & Casper, 2007) or between work outcomes
such as job satisfaction, organizational commitment, and career accomplishment (Marcinkus, Whelan-Berry, &

Europe's Journal of Psychology

2015, Vol. 11(3), 406–418
doi:10.5964/ejop.v11i3.869
Orkibi & Brandt 409

Gordon, 2007). However, to the best of our knowledge, work-life balance has not been tested as a mediator in
the specific relationship between positivity and job satisfaction. In this sense, the present study extends the liter-
ature by theorizing and examining whether a better work-life balance can be achieved by tapping personal resources
such as positivity, and hence can translate into greater job satisfaction.

Study Hypotheses
This study contributes to the literature in two major directions that are largely under-studied. It simultaneously
explores the empirical relations among positivity, work-life balance, and life satisfaction, and examines whether
the indirect relationship between positivity and job satisfaction is mediated through work-life balance. By concep-
tualizing positivity as an adaptive personal resource that has a pervasive influence on other resources, we hypo-
thesized that (1) there would be a positive correlation between positivity, work-life balance, and job satisfaction;
and that (2) the relationship between positivity and job satisfaction would be mediated by work-life balance.

Method
Participants and Procedure
One hundred and eight participants were recruited from several advertising and accounting organizations via e-
mail. To encourage participation, contacts were told that three prizes would be raffled among participants in each
organization. Those wishing to take part in the raffle were required to submit an e-mail address. All participants
were asked to fill out an anonymous online questionnaire that measured work-life balance, job satisfaction, and
positivity. Logging into the online questionnaire confirmed informed consent to participate in the study, but parti-
cipants could withdraw at any time. The University Human Research Ethics Committee approved the study (ap-
proval no.081/13).

The sample was composed of employees in an accounting firm (n = 23; 21%) and employees in three different
advertising firms (n = 85; 79%). A preliminary multivariate analysis of variance (conducted with workplace as the
independent variable and job satisfaction, work-life balance, and positivity as the dependent variables) revealed
no significant differences by workplace. Therefore, participants were treated as one sample in the remaining
analyses. Of the entire sample, 60% were female and 40% were male. The mean age was 31 with an age range
of 22 to 48 (most respondents were between 28 and 32). The majority of the respondents (93%) were born in Israel,
5% were born in the former Soviet Union, and the remaining 2% were born in Europe and other countries. The
majority of the participants (98%) identified themselves as Jewish, and the remaining 2% identified themselves
as Christians and members of other religions. Of the entire sample, 75% identified themselves as secular, 13%
as traditional, 4% as religious-Zionist, and 8% as other. The majority of all respondents were married (51%), lived
in the center of Israel (90%), rented an apartment with their roommates or partners (60%), and were currently
childless (70%; number of children ranged from zero to three). The mean for years in the current job was 5, with
a range of 2 months to 30 years. The majority of respondents held a Bachelor’s degree (60%), followed by non-
degree diplomas (18%), Master’s degrees (15%), and others (7%).

Measures
Respondents completed three self-report questionnaires in Hebrew that were translated into Hebrew from English
by bilingual professionals using Brislin's back translation technique (Cha, Kim, & Erlen, 2007).

Europe's Journal of Psychology

2015, Vol. 11(3), 406–418
doi:10.5964/ejop.v11i3.869
Positivity, Work-Life Balance, and Job Satisfaction 410

Work-Life Balance — A 15-item self-report scale (Hayman, 2005) was used to measure perceived work-life
balance across three dimensions: work interference in personal life (WIPL, e.g., “I neglect personal needs because
of work”), personal life interference with work (PLIW, e.g., “My work suffers because of my personal life”), and
work-personal life enhancement (WPLE, e.g.,“I have a better mood at work because of my personal life”). Re-
spondents indicated the frequency with which they had felt each item over the previous three months on a scale
ranging from 1 (not at all) to 7 (all the time), where a higher score indicated greater work-life balance (WIPL and
PLIW items were reverse coded to reflect balance because these dimensions are negatively worded and reflect
“imbalance”). In the present study, the Cronbach’s alpha for WIPL was α = .89, PLIW was α = .78, WPLW was α
= .68. The Cronbach’s alpha for the entire scale was α = .86, and the scale dimensions were used as indicators
of a latent variable in the model (see Figure 1).

Job Satisfaction — A short version of Brayfield and Rothe’s (1951) scale was used to measure employees’ job
satisfaction based on their attitudes towards their work (Judge, Locke, Durham, & Kluger, 1998). The scale had
five items (e.g., “I feel fairly well satisfied with my present job”), scored on a scale ranging from 1 (strongly disagree)
to 5 (strongly agree). Good internal consistency reliability was reported (α =.88). The correlation with the original
Job Description Index (Smith, Kendall, & Hulin, 1969) was high (.89). The correlations between self-reports and
significant-others reports show an average of .69 (Judge et al., 1998). In the present study, the Cronbach’s alpha
for internal consistency was α = .73.

Positivity — The Positivity Scale is an 8-item instrument that assesses the general tendency for a positive orient-
ation as a unidimensional construct. The scale’s psychometric properties have been well established in different
samples and cultures, including convergent and discriminant validity, internal validity, and temporal stability (for
details see Caprara, Alessandri, Eisenberg, et al., 2012). Recent results provide evidence for gender and cross-
cultural invariance and construct validity of the scale in five different samples across Europe (Heikamp et al.,
2014). Participants responded on a scale ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree). A sample item
is: “I have great faith in the future.” Previous studies showed that the alpha coefficient for the scale's internal
consistency ranged from .75 to .79, the mean corrected item-total correlation was .48 (SD =.06), and the determ-
inacy coefficient was as high as .89. In the present study, the Cronbach’s α was .74.

Data Analysis
Correlations were calculated to explore the relationships between all the variables. Using Amos software, struc-
tural equation analysis (SEM) was run to provide estimates of the mediation model. The mediating effect was
tested using bootstrap analysis with a confidence level of 0.95 and bootstrap bias-corrected samples set at 5000
(Preacher & Hayes, 2004).

Results
As shown in Table 1, the results confirmed the first hypothesis, indicating a positive correlation between positivity,
work-life balance (total score), and job satisfaction.

Europe's Journal of Psychology

2015, Vol. 11(3), 406–418
doi:10.5964/ejop.v11i3.869
Orkibi & Brandt 411

Table 1

Means, Standard Deviations, and Correlations Between Study Variables (N = 108)

Mean SD Positivity WLB JS

Positivity 3.84 0.45 –

WLB 3.34 0.81 .35** –
JS 3.53 0.69 .19* .46** –
Note. WLB = Work-life balance; JS = Job satisfaction.
*p < .05. **p < .01.

An exploratory multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) was conducted with the demographic variables of in-
terest as independent variables (age, gender, job title, number of children, marital status, and workplace seniority)
with job satisfaction, work-life balance, and positivity as the dependent variables. The MANOVA revealed significant
differences between employees with different seniority (years) in the workplace (Wilks’ Lambda = .770, F(12,
1270) = 2.58, p = .007). Significant positive correlations were found between workplace seniority and work-life
2
balance (B = 0.048, t = 3.37, p < .001, ηp =.098) and between seniority and job satisfaction (B = 0.027, t = 2.02,
2
p < .005, ηp =.037). Therefore, workplace seniority was included as a control variable in the mediation model.

Mediation Analysis
SEM was used to test the mediating role of work-life balance (as a latent variable) on the relationship between
positivity and job satisfaction. The bootstrap test method for indirect effects was used with a confidence interval
(CI) level set at .95 and bootstrap bias-corrected samples set at 5000 (Preacher & Hayes, 2004). Acceptable fit
2
parameters have been defined as X /df ≤ 3, a comparative fit index (CFI) ≥ .95, a Tucker–Lewis index (TLI) ≥
.95, and the root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA) < .080 (Schreiber, Nora, Stage, Barlow, & King,
2006).

The measurement model for work-life balance, assuming second-order structure with three factors, showed a
good fit to the data: CMIN/DF = 1.75 (p < .00), CFI = .93, TLI = .91, RMSEA = .08. Further analysis of the mediation
model in Figure 1 indicated a good fit with the observed data on the following fit indices: CMIN/DF = 1.51 (p =
.16), CFI = .97, TLI = .93, RMSEA = .07. Bootstrap results provided support for the mediating role of work-life
balance in the relationship between positivity and job satisfaction (p < .001, 95% CI [.187, 0.781]). Because the
confidence interval did not include zero, the null hypothesis of no mediation could be rejected. The direct effect
of positivity on job satisfaction was not significant (β = .22, p = .10), indicating full mediation. In addition, the total
effect was not significant (p < .123, 95% CI [–.070, 0.589]). As seen in Figure 1, the path coefficients from positivity
to work-life balance (β = .53, p < .001, 95% CI [.709, 0.318]) and from work-life balance to job satisfaction (β =
.74, p < .001, 95% CI [1.152, 0.435]) were statistically significant; as positivity increased, work-life balance increased
and as work-life balance increased, job satisfaction increased.

Europe's Journal of Psychology

2015, Vol. 11(3), 406–418
doi:10.5964/ejop.v11i3.869
Positivity, Work-Life Balance, and Job Satisfaction 412

Figure 1. Model depicting the hypothesized mediating role of work-life balance in the relationship between Positivity and Job
satisfaction.

Note. Workplace seniority was inserted as a control variable. All coefficients are standardized and significant at the p < .01
level. Dashed paths are not significant.

Because SEM only provides estimates of the total indirect effect between variables, we also used the recommended
procedure to calculate each of the specific indirect effects within the model, which yielded a separate z-score for
each indirect effect (Taylor, MacKinnon, & Tein, 2008). A specific indirect effect represents the portion of the total
indirect effect that operates through a specific intervening variable within a model. The test confirmed that work-
life balance mediated the relationship between positivity and job satisfaction (z = 2.70, p < .01).

Discussion
Today, the role of positive psychological factors in helping individuals sustain optimal functioning in both work
and personal life domains (Baltes et al., 2010) is attracting growing attention. This study contributes to the literature
not only by shedding light on the relationships between personal positivity, work-life balance, and job satisfaction,
but also by providing initial evidence for the psychological mechanism through which a trait-like positive psycho-
logical resource such as positivity might lead to greater job satisfaction. This strengthens the emerging body of
literature indicating the critical pervasive role of positivity as an adaptive personal resource that exerts its influence
on other resources.

Specifically, the findings lend empirical weight to previous studies showing that individuals’ tendency to evaluate
self, life, and the future in a positive way has adaptive value across many domains of functioning, including work
(e.g., Alessandri et al., 2015) and personal life (e.g., Alessandri et al., 2012b). Thus, individuals who have this
type of positive orientation may be more likely to focus on the positive side of experiences; i.e., how work and
personal life enhance each other rather than interfere with each other. This argument coincides with the idea that

Europe's Journal of Psychology

2015, Vol. 11(3), 406–418
doi:10.5964/ejop.v11i3.869
Orkibi & Brandt 413

shifting the focus of attention by reinterpreting threats as challenges can be an adaptive way to conserve positive
resources (Hobfoll, 1989, p. 519).

Hobfoll’s (1989, 2011) conservation of resources theory postulates that individuals are motivated to gain, obtain,
retain, foster, and protect resources, as well as prevent resource loss. Resources not only tend to aggregate and
generate gains of other resources, but individuals with greater resources are less vulnerable to resource loss and
more capable of orchestrating resource gain. Hobfoll (2011) noted that gain cycles are critical to work-family inter-
actions, as “both [are] jealous demanders of individuals’ resources, and to the extent that resources are built in
one domain that facilitates the other domain, this ‘battle for resources’ can become a common agenda” (p. 118).
In line with this view, the findings of this study imply that individuals with a positive orientation might be more likely
to “orchestrate resource gain” in terms of being able to manage and cope with the challenges associated with
“work interference with personal life” and “personal life interference with work” (Hayman, 2005). Thus, individuals
with a positive orientation may experience a sense of mastery and achievement in balancing work and non-work
demands. This positive experience may spill over and make them feel more satisfied with their jobs. The propensity
for a positive orientation, therefore, may translate into greater job satisfaction because it facilitates the ability to
balance work and non-work demands.

Furthermore, from a behavioral perspective, individuals with a positive orientation tend to succeed because they
are more diligent in dealing with problems (Scheier & Carver, 2003). They make more effort, engage in more
active problem-focused coping strategies, and therefore are more likely to reach their goals, or turn to adaptive
emotion-focused strategies such as acceptance, humor, and positive reframing (Rasmussen, Wrosch, Scheier,
& Carver, 2006). Thus, a positive orientation may act as a motivational force that sustains an individual’s efforts
to balance work and non-work demands. A positive orientation may help people make a continuing effort to deal
with work-life balance problems, use adaptive coping strategies that mitigate their perception of these problems,
and consequently experience more job satisfaction.

Because individuals with a positive orientation see events as predictable and generally in their best interests, they
may perceive events in their life and work as less threatening, their life and work related goals as more attainable,
and be more resilient to the impact of the challenges and stressors resulting from daily experiences and social
interactions. A positive orientation may thus also contribute to work-life balance by fostering high tolerance to
stress, resiliency, and commitment to valued goals such as family quality time (cf. Grassi et al., 2014).

In short, our findings help to explain how having positive orientation toward one’s self, life, and future may act as
an adaptive personal resource that exerts its influence on other resources, such as translating into greater job
satisfaction by means of facilitating the ability to balance work and non-work demands.

Limitations and Future Directions

There are several limitations to this study that deserve attention. First, the cross-sectional design of the study
precludes inferences of causality. Future studies should include longitudinal data or interventions to examine
work-life balance as a mechanism of treatment change. Second, because the data were collected from self-report
measures, future studies should collect data from respondents’ co-workers, supervisors, and/or employers to
enhance validity. A related possible limitation is that the data collected from respondents regarding their work-life
balance were self-perceived in that experiencing work-life balance was subjective. Future studies should include
a sample of employees’ actual work hours as well as reports of co-workers, supervisors, or family members. Al-

Europe's Journal of Psychology

2015, Vol. 11(3), 406–418
doi:10.5964/ejop.v11i3.869
Positivity, Work-Life Balance, and Job Satisfaction 414

though a pre-study sample size estimation was conducted, another limitation is the relatively small sample size
and the focus on work in a specific industry. Future studies should include a larger sample and employees from
different job sectors. Relatedly, the sample included respondents from the urban center of the country, which is
typically characterized by a fast-paced lifestyle, compared to peripheral or rural areas. Future studies should include
a more heterogeneous sample with greater variance in socio-demographic characteristics. Multi group SEM
analysis could be used to compare the model invariance across different groups of employees (Byrne, 2004). In
addition, because all the respondents were Israelis, and the vast majority were Jewish, future studies should include
workers from other countries and religious affiliations to scrutinize the external validity of findings. Finally, the
current study focused on the contribution of positivity to the relationship between job satisfaction and work-life
balance. Future studies should examine other possible positive psychological variables that might contribute to
this relationship as well, such as work social support, creativity, innovation, self-control, coping ability, and integrity.

Implications
The model theorized in this study has practical implications for promoting employees’ potentials and strengths in
balancing the demands of work and life, which may in turn lead to experiencing more satisfaction on the job.
Based on the current results, organizations would be wise to assess employees’ positive orientation, their ability
to manage work-life balance demands, and job satisfaction. Employees with a less positive orientation, difficulties
balancing work-life demands, and poor job satisfaction could benefit from organizational interventions aiming at
the amplification of a positive orientation and the skills needed to preserve the work-life balance.

Specifically, such interventions could employ psychological strategies for enhancing positive cognitions and
emotions regarding one’s self, life, and future, which are the “ingredients” of positivity. A recent systematic review
of research suggests that positive psychological interventions applied in the organizational context are a promising
way to enhance employee well-being and performance, as well as to reduce stress, burnout, depression, and
anxiety (see Meyers, van Woerkom, & Bakker, 2013). Nevertheless, future experimental studies should examine
the extent to which implementing interventions that specifically aim at identifying, developing and broadening
employees’ positive orientation can promote their ability to balance work-life demands and increase their job sat-
isfaction.

Conclusion
This study suggests that work-life balance may serve as a psychological mechanism that enables individuals to
harness their positive orientation such that it translates into greater satisfaction with their job. Individuals with a
positive orientation appear to have more resources to balance work and life demands that may lead to experiencing
more job satisfaction. The model presented here should be tested in future experimental studies, because a poor
work-life balance and low job satisfaction can influence not only employees’ performance but also their well-being.

Funding
The authors have no funding to report.

Competing Interests
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Europe's Journal of Psychology

2015, Vol. 11(3), 406–418
doi:10.5964/ejop.v11i3.869
Orkibi & Brandt 415

Acknowledgments
The authors have no support to report.

References
Alessandri, G., Borgogni, L., Schaufeli, W. B., Caprara, G. V., & Consiglio, C. (2015). From positive orientation to job
performance: The role of work engagement and self-efficacy beliefs. Journal of Happiness Studies, 16, 767-788.
doi:10.1007/s10902-014-9533-4

Alessandri, G., Caprara, G. V., & Tisak, J. (2012a). A unified latent curve, latent state-trait analysis of the developmental
trajectories and correlates of positive orientation. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 47(3), 341-368.
doi:10.1080/00273171.2012.673954

Alessandri, G., Caprara, G. V., & Tisak, J. (2012b). The unique contribution of positive orientation to optimal functioning:
Further explorations. European Psychologist, 17(1), 44-54. doi:10.1027/1016-9040/a000070

Alessandri, G., Vecchione, M., Tisak, J., Deiana, G., Caria, S., & Caprara, G. V. (2012). The utility of positive orientation in
predicting job performance and organisational citizenship behaviors. Applied Psychology, 61(4), 669-698.
doi:10.1111/j.1464-0597.2012.00511.x

Allen, T. D., Herst, D. E. L., Bruck, C. S., & Sutton, M. (2000). Consequences associated with work-to-family conflict: A review
and agenda for future research. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 5(2), 278-308. doi:10.1037/1076-8998.5.2.278

Allen, T. D., Johnson, R. C., Saboe, K. N., Cho, E., Dumani, S., & Evans, S. (2012). Dispositional variables and work–family
conflict: A meta-analysis. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 80(1), 17-26. doi:10.1016/j.jvb.2011.04.004

Amstad, F. T., Meier, L. L., Fasel, U., Elfering, A., & Semmer, N. K. (2011). A meta-analysis of work-family conflict and various
outcomes with a special emphasis on cross-domain versus matching-domain relations. Journal of Occupational Health
Psychology, 16(2), 151-169. doi:10.1037/a0022170

Aryee, S., Srinivas, E. S., & Tan, H. H. (2005). Rhythms of life: Antecedents and outcomes of work–family balance in employed
parents. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 132-146. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.90.1.132

Baltes, B. B., Clark, M. A., & Chakrabarti, M. (2010). Work-life balance: The roles of work-family conflict and work-family
facilitation. In P. A. Linley, S. Harrington, & N. Garcea (Eds.), Oxford handbook of positive psychology and work (pp.
201-212). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

Beck, A. T. (1967). Depression: Clinical, experimental, and theoretical aspects. New York, NY: Hoeber Medical Division.

Brayfield, A. H., & Rothe, H. F. (1951). An index of job satisfaction. Journal of Applied Psychology, 35(5), 307-311.
doi:10.1037/h0055617

Byrne, B. M. (2004). Testing for multigroup invariance using AMOS Graphics: A road less traveled. Structural Equation Modeling,
11(2), 272-300. doi:10.1207/s15328007sem1102_8

Caprara, G. V., Alessandri, G., Eisenberg, N., Kupfer, A., Steca, P., Caprara, M. G., . . . Abela, J. (2012). The Positivity Scale.
Psychological Assessment, 24(3), 701-712. doi:10.1037/a0026681

Europe's Journal of Psychology

2015, Vol. 11(3), 406–418
doi:10.5964/ejop.v11i3.869
Positivity, Work-Life Balance, and Job Satisfaction 416

Caprara, G. V., Alessandri, G., Trommsdorff, G., Heikamp, T., Yamaguchi, S., & Suzuki, F. (2012). Positive orientation across
three cultures. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 43, 77-83. doi:10.1177/0022022111422257

Caprara, G. V., Fagnani, C., Alessandri, G., Steca, P., Gigantesco, A., Sforza, L. L. C., & Stazi, M. A. (2009). Human optimal
functioning: The genetics of positive orientation towards self, life, and the future. Behavior Genetics, 39(3), 277-284.
doi:10.1007/s10519-009-9267-y

Caprara, G. V., Steca, P., Alessandri, G., Abela, J. R., & McWhinnie, C. M. (2010). Positive orientation: Explorations on what
is common to life satisfaction, self-esteem, and optimism. Epidemiologia e Psichiatria Sociale, 19(1), 63-71.
doi:10.1017/S1121189X00001615

Carver, C. S., & Scheier, M. (1998). On the self-regulation of behavior. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University
Press.

Cha, E. S., Kim, K. H., & Erlen, J. A. (2007). Translation of scales in cross-cultural research: Issues and techniques. Journal
of Advanced Nursing, 58, 386-395. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04242.x

Cortese, C. G., Colombo, L., & Ghislieri, C. (2010). Determinants of nurses job satisfaction: The role of work-family conflict,
job demand, emotional charge and social support. Journal of Nursing Management, 18, 35-43.
doi:10.1111/j.1365-2834.2009.01064.x

Diener, E., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J., & Griffin, S. (1985). The satisfaction with life scale. Journal of Personality Assessment,
49(1), 71-75. doi:10.1207/s15327752jpa4901_13

Faragher, E. B., Cass, M., & Cooper, C. L. (2005). The relationship between job satisfaction and health: A meta-analysis.
Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 62(2), 105-112. doi:10.1136/oem.2002.006734

Fisher, G. G. (2002). Work/personal life balance: A construct development study. Dissertation Abstracts International: B. The
Sciences and Engineering, 63(1-B), 575.

Frone, M. R., Russell, M., & Cooper, M. L. (1992). Antecedents and outcomes of work family conflict: Testing a model of the
work family interface. Journal of Applied Psychology, 77(1), 65-78. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.77.1.65

Grandey, A. A., & Cropanzano, R. (1999). The conservation of resources model applied to work-family conflict and strain.
Journal of Vocational Behavior, 54, 350-370. doi:10.1006/jvbe.1998.1666

Grassi, M. C., Alessandri, G., Pasquariello, S., Milioni, M., Enea, D., Ceccanti, M., . . . Caprara, G. V. (2014). Association
between positivity and smoking cessation. BioMed Research International, 2014, Article 780146. doi:10.1155/2014/780146

Greenhaus, J. H., & Beutell, N. J. (1985). Sources of conflict between work and family roles. Academy of Management Review,
10, 76-88.

Harter, S. (1993). Causes and consequences of low self-esteem in children and adolescents. In R. F. Baumeister (Ed.),
Self-esteem: The puzzle of low self-regard (pp. 87-116). New York, NY: Plenum.

Hayman, J. (2005). Psychometric assessment of an instrument designed to measure work life balance. Research and Practice
in Human Resource Management, 13, 85-91.

Europe's Journal of Psychology

2015, Vol. 11(3), 406–418
doi:10.5964/ejop.v11i3.869
Orkibi & Brandt 417

Heikamp, T., Alessandri, G., Laguna, M., Petrovic, V., Caprara, M. G., & Trommsdorff, G. (2014). Cross-cultural validation of
the positivity-scale in five European countries. Personality and Individual Differences, 71, 140-145.
doi:10.1016/j.paid.2014.07.012

Hobfoll, S. E. (1989). Conservation of resources: A new attempt at conceptualizing stress. American Psychologist, 44(3),
513-524. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.44.3.513

Hobfoll, S. E. (2011). Conservation of resource caravans and engaged settings. Journal of Occupational and Organizational
Psychology, 84, 116-122. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8325.2010.02016.x

Jones, T. G., Rapport, L. J., Hanks, R. A., Lichtenberg, P. A., & Telmet, K. (2003). Cognitive and psychosocial predictors of
subjective well-being in urban older adults. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 17, 3-18. doi:10.1076/clin.17.1.3.15626

Judge, T. A., Locke, E. A., Durham, C. C., & Kluger, A. N. (1998). Dispositional effects on job and life satisfaction: The role of
core evaluations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83(1), 17-34. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.83.1.17

Kernis, M. H. (2003). Toward a conceptualization of optimal self-esteem. Psychological Inquiry, 14, 1-26.
doi:10.1207/S15327965PLI1401_01

Linley, P. A., Harrington, S., & Garcea, N. (Eds.). (2010). Oxford handbook of positive psychology and work. Oxford, United
Kingdom: Oxford University Press.

Lunau, T., Bambra, C., Eikemo, T. A., van der Wel, K. A., & Dragano, N. (2014). A balancing act? Work–life balance, health
and well-being in European welfare states. European Journal of Public Health, 24, 422-427. doi:10.1093/eurpub/cku010

Luthans, F., Avolio, B. J., Avey, J. B., & Norman, S. M. (2007). Positive psychological capital: Measurement and relationship
with performance and satisfaction. Personnel Psychology, 60, 541-572. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.2007.00083.x

Marcinkus, W. C., Whelan-Berry, K. S., & Gordon, J. R. (2007). The relationship of social support to the work-family balance
and work outcomes of midlife women. Women in Management Review, 22(2), 86-111. doi:10.1108/09649420710732060

Meyers, M. C., van Woerkom, M., & Bakker, A. B. (2013). The added value of the positive: A literature review of positive
psychology interventions in organizations. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 22(5), 618-632.
doi:10.1080/1359432X.2012.694689

Nikandrou, I., Panayotopoulou, L., & Apospori, E. (2008). The impact of individual and organizational characteristics on
work-family conflict and career outcomes. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 23(5), 576-598.
doi:10.1108/02683940810884540

Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2004). SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models.
Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 36(4), 717-731. doi:10.3758/BF03206553

Rasmussen, H. N., Wrosch, C., Scheier, M. F., & Carver, C. S. (2006). Self-regulation processes and health: The importance
of optimism and goal adjustment. Journal of Personality, 74(6), 1721-1747. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.2006.00426.x

Ruderman, M. N., Ohlott, P. J., Panzer, K., & King, S. N. (2002). Benefits of multiple roles for managerial women. Academy
of Management Journal, 45(2), 369-386. doi:10.2307/3069352

Europe's Journal of Psychology

2015, Vol. 11(3), 406–418
doi:10.5964/ejop.v11i3.869
Positivity, Work-Life Balance, and Job Satisfaction 418

Scheier, M. F., & Carver, C. S. (2003). Self-regulatory processes and responses to health threats: Effects of optimism on
well-being. In J. Suls & K. A. Wallston (Eds.), Social psychological foundations of health and illness (pp. 395-428). Malden,
MA: Blackwell.

Schreiber, J. B., Nora, A., Stage, F. K., Barlow, E. A., & King, J. (2006). Reporting structural equation modeling and confirmatory
factor analysis results: A review. The Journal of Educational Research, 99(6), 323-338. doi:10.3200/JOER.99.6.323-338

Siahpush, M., Spittal, M., & Singh, G. K. (2008). Happiness and life satisfaction prospectively predict self-rated health, physical
health, and the presence of limiting, long-term health conditions. American Journal of Health Promotion, 23(1), 18-26.
doi:10.4278/ajhp.061023137

Smith, P. C., Kendall, L. M., & Hulin, C. L. (1969). The measurement of satisfaction in work and retirement: A strategy for the
study of attitudes. Chicago, IL: Rand McNally.

Spector, P. (1997). Job satisfaction: Application, assessment, causes and consequences. California, CA: Sage.

State Services Commission - New Zealand. (2005). Work-life balance: A resource for the state services. Retrieved from
http://www.ssc.govt.nz/node/6848

Taylor, A. B., MacKinnon, D. P., & Tein, J.-Y. (2008). Tests of the three-path mediated effect. Organizational Research Methods,
11(2), 241-269. doi:10.1177/1094428107300344

Tedeschi, J. T., & Norman, N. (1985). Social power, self-presentation, and the self. In B. R. Schlenker (Ed.), The self and
social life (pp. 293-322). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.

Thomas, L. T., & Ganster, D. C. (1995). Impact of family-supportive work variables on work-family conflict and strain: A control
perspective. Journal of Applied Psychology, 80(1), 6-15. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.80.1.6

Virick, M., Lilly, J. D., & Casper, W. J. (2007). Doing more with less: An analysis of work life balance among layoff survivors.
Career Development International, 12(5), 463-480. doi:10.1108/13620430710773772

Voydanoff, P. (2005). Toward a conceptualization of perceived work-family fit and balance: A demands and resources approach.
Journal of Marriage and the Family, 67(4), 822-836. doi:10.1111/j.1741-3737.2005.00178.x

Yeung, A., & Chow, C. (2000). Correlates of subjective well-being of Chinese elderly in Hong Kong. Journal of Social Work
Research and Evaluation, 1, 165-184.

About the Authors

Hod Orkibi, PhD, is a psychodramatist therapist, lecturer, and researcher. His research interests include adolescents’ well-
being, psychodrama and positive psychology outcome and change process studies, and professional development and training.

Yaron Ilan Brandt, MA, is a psychodrama therapist working with clients suffering from mental illness and with youth at risk.
He also works with organizations and teams.

Europe's Journal of Psychology PsychOpen is a publishing service by Leibniz Institute

2015, Vol. 11(3), 406–418 for Psychology Information (ZPID), Trier, Germany.
doi:10.5964/ejop.v11i3.869 www.zpid.de/en