Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 3K views

    Muet 8004 Rubric and Marking Criteria For Essay Writing Asse

    Uploaded by

    Christina Ho
    This document outlines the rubric and marking criteria for essay writing assessments. It includes details on the components being assessed such as the introduction, body paragraphs, conclusion, language use, and organization. For each component, descriptors are provided for excellent, good, satisfactory, modest, limited, and very limited response levels, with points allocated for each level. The total possible marks are 60, with band scores ranging from 1 to 6.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Muet 8004 Rubric and Marking Criteria For Essay Writing Asse

    Uploaded by

    Christina Ho
    3K views3 pages
    This document outlines the rubric and marking criteria for essay writing assessments. It includes details on the components being assessed such as the introduction, body paragraphs, conclusion, language use, and organization. For each component, descriptors are provided for excellent, good, satisfactory, modest, limited, and very limited response levels, with points allocated for each level. The total possible marks are 60, with band scores ranging from 1 to 6.

    Original Title

    MUET 8004 RUBRIC AND MARKING CRITERIA FOR ESSAY WRITING ASSE.docx

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    This document outlines the rubric and marking criteria for essay writing assessments. It includes details on the components being assessed such as the introduction, body paragraphs, conclusion, language use, and organization. For each component, descriptors are provided for excellent, good, satisfactory, modest, limited, and very limited response levels, with points allocated for each level. The total possible marks are 60, with band scores ranging from 1 to 6.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    3K views3 pages

    Muet 8004 Rubric and Marking Criteria For Essay Writing Asse

    Uploaded by

    Christina Ho
    This document outlines the rubric and marking criteria for essay writing assessments. It includes details on the components being assessed such as the introduction, body paragraphs, conclusion, language use, and organization. For each component, descriptors are provided for excellent, good, satisfactory, modest, limited, and very limited response levels, with points allocated for each level. The total possible marks are 60, with band scores ranging from 1 to 6.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    of 3

    eRUBRIC AND MARKING CRITERIA FOR ESSAY WRITING ASSESSMENT

    Name: __________________________ Class: _________ Date: _____________

    ITEM DESCRIPTION ALLOTTED OBTAINED


    MARKS MARKS
    PARAGRAPH DETAILS
    Introduction General statements/Background information. 1
    (5 marks)  1 if general, 0.5 if too general or narrow, 0 if none.
    Specific statement. 1
     1 if stated, 0.5 if unclear, 0 if none.
    Stand 1
     1 if stated, 0.5 if unclear, 0 if none.
    (In my opinion, I strongly agree/disagree/partially
    agree, etc.).
    Thesis statement. 2
    2 if clearly stated, 1 if partially stated, 0 if none.
    Topic sentence is provided for each point. 2 if 6
    clearly stated with good use of cohesive devices), 1 if
    partially stated with minor problem, 0 if none.
    Supporting details (Use of SAERA technique – 10
    statistics, anecdotes, examples, reasons and
    authority).
     Excellent response; develops ideas effectively and
    well-linked; presents ideas effectively; mature
    Content Body treatment of the topic. Excellent use of
    (30 marks) Paragraphs engagement markers, idioms etc. (9-10).
    (20 marks)  Good response; reasonable development of ideas
    and well-linked ideas; reasonable viewpoints and
    reasonable mature treatment of topic. Good
    use of engagement markers, idioms etc. (7-8).
     Satisfactory response and development of ideas;
    info. Linked; satisfactory viewpoints and
    satisfactory mature treatment of topic.
    Satisfactory use of engagement markers, idioms
    etc. (6).
     Modest response, development of ideas and info.
    link; very modest presentation of viewpoints.
    Modest use of engagement markers (4-5).
     Limited response; hardly develops ideas; poorly
    linked; hardly any attempt to present viewpoints
    and mature treatment of topic (3).
     Very limited response; mere mention of stimuli;
    no attempt to present viewpoints; shallow and
    immature treatment of topic (0-2).
    Concluding sentences. 4
    3-4 if all are clearly stated, 1-2 if partially stated, 0 if
    none.
    Use of summary/restatement of 3
    Conclusion ideas/suggestions/recommendations and
    (5 marks) predictions/quotations/proverbs/idioms.
    3 if clearly stated, 1-2 if partially stated, 0 if none.
    Reaffirmation of stand. 2 if clearly stated, 1 if 2
    partially stated, 0 if none.
    - Example: In my opinion, I still
    agree/disagree/partially agree that…
    - I would like to reaffirm that ….
     Very confident control of language; accurate 30
    language, hardly any spelling errors; very
    clear meaning; effective and wide variety of
    sentence structure; very appropriate and
    varied vocabulary; very effective-linked
    Language ideas; clear unity and coherent paragraphs
    and (27-30).
    Organisation  Reasonable confident control of language;
    (30 marks) largely accurate language with minor errors;
    generally accurate spelling; very clear
    meaning; some variety of sentence
    structures; appropriate and varied
    vocabulary; effectively linked ideas; unity
    and coherent paragraphs (23-26).
     Satisfactory control of language; fairly
    accurate language with some minor errors;
    few spelling errors; satisfactory meaning;
    some variety of sentences but tendency to
    use simple sentences; reasonably
    appropriate and varied vocabulary;
    satisfactory linked ideas; some evidence of
    planning and unity and reasonably coherent
    (19-22).
     Modest control of language; some accurate
    language but more serious mistakes; some
    spelling errors; meaning occasionally
    unclear; limited variety of sentences,
    generally simple; modestly appropriate but
    simple vocabulary; quite satisfactory link of
    ideas; paragraphs lack unity and have some
    coherence (15-18).
     Poor control of language; largely inaccurate
    language with more spelling errors; blurred
    meaning; hardly any sentence variety; hardly
    any appropriate vocabulary; hardly any
    attempts to link ideas; no planning or unity
    or coherence (11-14).

    Very poor control of language; language grossly


    inaccurate; blurred meaning with serious
    spelling errors; unclear and incomprehensible
    meaning; no sentence variety; inappropriate
    vocabulary and no variety; no linking of ideas;
    haphazard paragraph or non-existent; no
    coherence (0-10).
    Total 60%
    Band: 1 (0-20), 2 (21-28), 3 (29-36), 4 (37-44), 5 (45-52) & 6 (53-60) 1 2 3 4 5 6
    LEM/MUET/8004/QN2/05122017

    You might also like