1

To, June 28, 2019

Hon’ble Chief Secretary cum Litigation Hearing Authority,

Govt of Haryana, Chandigarh.

Subject: Unnecessary Litigation & delay of 12 years to dispose Appeal adopting illegal mechanism:
Intolerance with major hard ship crossing limits with double standards created Brain tumor.

Greetings,

It is humbly submitted that:

1. If any officials, who were duty bound to do assigned work and he failed to do so, concealed
facts before his seniors breaching his trust then how can be holding senior officers for gross
negligence of supervision, whereas seniors officers protested moving appeal in 2006 and
subordinate tainted officials accepted their guilt for not moving appeal.
2. In 2018, appeal were turn down with remarks that keeping lenient view, instead taking legal
action for embezzlement, only recovery made, whereas after these comments, I moved
complaint before Police to lodge FIR as per above said appellate authority comments but
Police also failed to lodge FIR for embezzlement with breach of trust.
3. When a appeal for re-consideration moved, again turn down with remarks that there is no
provision in rules, whereas which rule allowed them to keep appeal undecided for above 12
years, besides it orders dated 4-9-2006 dispatched on dated 5-10-2006 and further service
benefits such as many years annual increments with ACP, which were withheld not released
after orders dated 5-10-2006.
4. Whereas, above 12 years mental torture created Brain tumor, medical reports with all
attachments needs to be examined outside KVIB being biased – incompetent mechanism.

Hence, responsibility may kindly be fixed on the incompetent officials because due to continues
mental torture, some disorders reported in brain and orders dated 4-9-2006 set-aside, recovered
amount may be released with heavy compensation.

सर्वे भर्वन्तु सुखिनः सर्वे सन्तु ननरामया। Justice delayed Justice denied.

Yours Scouting’s,

Naresh Kadyan, TSL (Rtd),

C-38, Rose Apartment, Prashant Vihar, Sector-14, Rohini, Delhi – 110085.

Copy forwarded for immediate attention, necessary action:

1. His Excellency President of India. If anything happens then defective system of Haryana
KVIB hold accountable.
2. Hon’ble Chief Justice, Supreme Court of India.
3. Hon’ble Chief Justice, Punjab & Haryana High Court.
4. Hon’ble Chairperson – Chief Executive, Haryana KVIB
 2

KVIC – High Court, communications about Board Act at P-3 to 5 with petition P-6 to 7.

1 HRB/Admn/EA-1/1735 dated 8-4-2019 to ACS Industry, Re-consideration 8-9

2 Impugned order dated 4-9-2006, which was conveyed on 5-10- 10
2006, holding gross negligence in proper supervision
3 KVIB communication with Faridabad Police: HRB/Admn/EA- 11-13
1/6270 dated 9-8-2018 as complaint moved for FIR
4 Communication about hearing of Appeal against CE orders 14-18

5 Chairperson decision on Appeal with observations after 12 year 19

6 GOVHY/E/2018/00943 to lodged FIR as observations 20

7 Faridabad Police, refusing to lodge FIR as per observations 21-25

8 HRB/Admn/16507 Charge sheet for negligence in supervision 26-34

9 Deduction order of Gautam Dutt, Clerk and No appeal was 35

made against embezzlement, which proved their guilt.
10 Deduction order of late Jagdish Chand, JA not challenged 36

11 CMOFF/N/2019/015048: Appeal not maintainable 37

12 Communication among DoPT with Chief Secretary, Haryana 38-44

13 Complaint against YS Malik, IAS bearing MORTH/E/2019/00634 45-48

14 Cabinet Secretariat letter dated 23-4-2019 with YS Malik note – CS Haryana 49-52
15 Report of Yudhvir Malik dated 8-4-2013, TSL suspended not reinstated till 53-63
VRS under protest, BoD 20-12-2012 minutes, TS (HMP) left undisturbed.
Communication of Punjab & Haryana High Court about Board Act with Appeals P-64-66
KVIC communications at P- 67 to 69 with Chief Secretary letter dated about website 12-4-2019 at
P-70.

5. Khadi Gramodyog priority of Hon’ble Prime Minister of India, reply bearing No.
HRB/Admn/EA-1/ 141 dated 6-4-2016 at P-71 Complaint No. 1095/14/2016 before Haryana
Human Rights Commission, endorsed KVIC but replied vide HRB/Admn/EA-1/3418 dated
29-8-2016 with bogus facts, misleading information’s at P- 72 to 77.
6. Haryana Human Rights Commission decision at P- 78 to 80 with observation of time bar,
keeping in view the appeal of 2006 was decided in 2018 by the Chairperson of the Haryana
KVIB, which is a limit of intolerance but सर्वे भर्वन्तु सुखिनः सर्वे सन्तु ननरामया।
7. Disorder reported in brain MRI by Sir Ganga Ram Hospital and AIIMS as scientific
evidence about mental torture at P-81 to 87.
3
4
5
 6

To, April 27, 2019

Hon’ble Lokpal to Govt. of India. Complaint No. 229 Dated 28-4-2019

Committee on Petitions, Rajya Sabha via KVIC.
Committee on Petitions, Haryana Legislative Assembly via KVIB.

Subject: Appeal against CE orders dated 4-9-2006 but dispatched on 5-10-2006 still pending.

Haryana KVIB uploaded Act without amendment replacing Punjab to Haryana: No 7th Pay
Commission benefits for retired persons, official on pay role recorded minutes of BoD’s.

Greetings,

Kind attention: Lokpal to Govt. of India, Cabinet Secretary with Department of Personnel and
Training, as annual Increments along with ACP benefits were not released after order dated 4-9-
2006, dispatched on 5-10-2006, created major hardship, great mental torture with financial loss,
besides it appeal against order dated 4-9-2006 also claimed to be decided on 22-3-2018, badly delay
of a period more than 12 years, whereas Faridabad Police refused to lode FIR, keeping in view
orders passed by the Chairperson as on 22-3-2018.

Reference:

1. ACS Ind/CA/SDIT Deptt./2707 dated 5-3-2019 - HRB/Admn/EA-1/1735 dated 8-4-2019.

2. Cabinet Secretariat ID No. 501/VI/08/2019-VCC dated 23-4-2019.
3. Road Transport & Highways ID No. A-46015/1/2019-E.1 dated 8-3-2019 with Note of
Yudhvir Singh Malik as Secretary of the Ministry with fabricated – false facts.

Kindly refer to then CE orders dated 4-9-2006 but why dispatched after 30 days as on 5-10-2006
bearing No. 11253 read with the appeal against the said orders still undecided even after personal
hearing before present Chairperson, even her decision conveyed on CM window 18948 dated 10-2-
2015, complaint moved as GOVHY/E/2018/00943 on 30-3-2018 to the Faridabad Police to lodge
FIR as per decision of Chairperson being effected person as breach of trust but Faridabad Police
endorsed against the observation of Chairperson, whereas KVIB again concealed facts while
mishandling ID No. ACS Ind/CA/SDIT Deptt./2707 dated 5-3-2019, replied vide ID No.
HRB/Admn/EA-1/1735 dated 8-4-2019.

I offer my deducted amount with interest be donated to the Prime Minister Relief Fund being
Chowkidar as Justice delayed Justice denied, why should I suffer for nothing in Supervisory
capacity, when tainted subordinate staff were very much duty bound, then they should penalized,
bear the loss instead me? Please find attached here with all relevant evidences to grant me personal
hearing to explain orally as this matter is badly delayed, mishandled as well since beginning till
today, inviting unnecessary harassment, mental torture, financial loss with unnecessary litigations,
pain & sufferings: Intolerance of competent person in KVIB sector: सर्वे भर्वन्तु सुखिनः सर्वे सन्तु ननरामया।

Yours in Scouting’s,

Chowkidar Naresh Kadyan, Convener,

Kadyan Khap International, VPO Siwana, Tehsil Beri, District Jhajjar.
 7

If I being District Khadi & Village Industries Officer at Faridabad, hold accountable for gross
negligence in supervision when subordinate officials violated their duties & functions, who were
appointed by the Board itself to assist me as DKVIO but they were breach my trust:

1. Whether I being TSL was entitled – eligible for the promotion to the Development Officer
(Leather) after the retirement of Shri JL Jggi and Hukam Chand?
2. Whether I being TSL senior then Shri Yash Parkash Goyat and Chiman Lal as
Demonstrator, if yes then who is responsible for fabricated facts submitted false report
before the Human Rights Commission, Haryana in the complaint case No. 1095/14/2016 as
claimed TSL was junior then Demonstrator (Leather) at serial 5 of point 7, vide letter No.
HRB/Admn/EA-1/3418 dated 29-8-2016?
3. Whether sickness as on 4-3-2013 and fitness certificates as on 1-5-2013 of Sarvodaya
Hospital, Faridabad, which was approved by the Govt. of Haryana for treatment, verified
as genuine by the Faridabad Police vide DRGPO/E/2016/00420, never examined by both
Inquiry Officers, while processing the replies against two charge sheets for same reason,
leave on medical grounds was rejected unlawfully, forcibly adopting double standards as
order dated 25-4-2013, dispatched on 4-6-2013 after many months later?
4. Whether TSL was entitles – eligible for all service benefits, which were withheld due to
charge sheet. Same was decided as on 4-9-2006, orders dispatched on 5-10-2006 but service
benefits were illegally withheld after order 4-9-2006?
5. Whether Section Officer (Legal & Recovery) proposal dated 15-12-2009 was justified, which
proposed to file the legal right of service benefits to TSL?
6. Whether TSL was reinstated after obtaining Inquiry report on 1-4-2014, conveyed May 29?
7. Whether TSL, continued under suspension till 5-8-2014 was justified?
8. Whether TSL was granted subsistence allowances as per rules during May 2013 to August
2014, increased @ 75% after six months suspension without charge sheet?
9. Whether TSL was granted personal hearing against all three charge sheets – Inquiry
reports, compelled to move VRS due unavoidable circumstances as on 5-8-2014?
10. Whether TSL granted overtime to serve after duty hours as In-charge of Consignment
Agency at Faridabad and compensation against working on Saturdays?
11. Whether House rent granted to TSL after shifting HQ from Rewari to Faridabad?
12. Whether Store Keeper cum Clerk dispatched – handed over the 138 kg copper to the
transporter, accepting on behalf of Sterilite, Faridabad Police also verified, while dropping
FIR No. 37 then why gratuity portion of TSL withheld till today?
13. Whether Haryana Khadi & VI Board accepted legally Punjab KVIB Act, 1955 as on 1-2-
1969, amending section 3 of the said Act, replacing Punjab with Haryana?
14. Whether PEPSU Societies Registration Act, 1954, law applicable in Haryana KVIB?
15. Whether section 33 of the Punjab KVIB Act, 1955 applicable in Haryana, KVIB earned 5%
service charges as revenue, as per agreement, executed between Board & suppliers during
marketing & who is responsible to supply sub-standard materials, to issue Registration?
16. Whether 7th pay commission applicable on pensions for retired officials of KVIB?

Jat by birth: Cobbler by profession: Activist by mission: Humanitarian by choice -

Chowkidar Naresh Kadyan

8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
 20

Details for registration number: GOVHY/E/2018/00943

Name of Complainant Naresh Kadyan
Date of Receipt 30/03/2018
Received by Ministry / Department Haryana
Grievance Description:
SHO, Old Police Station, Faridabad.
Subject: FIR for breach of trust, concealing facts, temporarily embezzlement of criminal
nature, violating the IPC 120-B, 409, 420 etc. by Jagdish Chander, Assistant (Rtd) with
Gautam Dutt, Clerk, working as In charge, District office at Gurugram.
It is humbly submitted that:
1. I had been District Khadi and Village Industries Officer at Faridabad with certain duties
and functions, to perform effectively, subordinate staff with specific duties and functions
were also deputed.
2. Shri Jagdish Chander, Assistant was posted to monitor the accounts and Audit aspects of
the District along with the work of the Clerk, besides it Assistant / Junior Auditor duties
and functions were also defined by the Board, whereas if any suspicious activities observed
at the level of Assistant / Junior Auditor then he was duty bound to place the same on
record and to intimate DKVIO at once.
3. Shri Gautam Dutt, Clerk was also posted, to perform as per duties and functions, vested
in the post of Clerk, which were already defined and in practice.
A special Audit was conducted for District Faridabad and some malpractices were
reported as per report, which were neither been observed nor reported by the Assistant /
Junior Auditor to me as DKVIO, similar act at the level of the Clerk, which is a clear cut
matter of breaching of trust as subordinate staff Shri Jagdish Chander and Gautam Dutt,
jointly.
Shri Jagdish Chander, Gautam Dutt along with me as DKVIO were charge sheeted, both
these were accepted the punishment of deduction as recovery but I moved protest petition
against the decision of the Chief Executive of the Board about deduction of Rs. 9031/- from
my pay, because I was hold accountable for poor supervision over the subordinate staff, my
appeal before the Chairman of the Board, against the order Dated 5-10-2006 arrived at
conclusion at the level of the Chairperson of the Board with observation that matter was
temporarily embezzlement of criminal nature, violation of the IPC 120-B, 409, 420 as per
her order Dated 22-3-2018 (Copy attached). It would also be pertinent to mention here that
Chief Executive provide the services of these both subordinate staff to perform certain
duties and functions, if they concealed facts and commit any offense, breaching trust of
their seniors then these both officials be responsible and I can’t be hold accountable.
Hence, FIR against these both Shri Jagdish Chander, Assistant (Rtd) and Gautam Dutt,
Clerk, working as In charge of the District office at Gurugram and Mewat may kindly be
lodged.
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
 37

CM Grievances Redressal System

आपके निकायत की खथिनत / Your Grievance Status
शिकायत सं ख्या/Registration No. CMOFF/N/2019/015048
शिकायतकताा का नाम / Name of Complainant NARESH KADIAN
Grievance Relates To JHAJJAR
प्राप्त कताा / Received By मुख्यमंत्री कायाा लय
प्राप्ती शतशि / Received On 06-02-2019
वता मान में मामला / Case Presently with मुख्यमंत्री कायाा लय
वता मान स्थिशत / Current Status मामले का शनपटारा
शववरण /कारण/ Details/Reason :

Action History
Case
Action Action Taken Report
Description Sent By Presently
Date Attachment / Remarks
Dealt
Reason: Not
Chief Chief
11-02- Case Disposed Maintainable Being not
Minister Minister
2019 Of maintainable on this
Office Office
portal.
Chief Chief
06-02- Undertake To
Minister Minister
2019 Redress
Office Office
Chief
06-02- Received The
Citizen Minister
2019 Grievance
Office
 38

Details for registration number: PRSEC/E/2019/02943

Name of Complainant Naresh Kadyan
Date of Receipt 10/02/2019
Received by President's Secretariat
Grievance Description:
Yudhvir Singh Malik (born 19 March 1959) is a 1984 batch IAS officer of Haryana cadre, he has
served in various key positions for both the Union Government and the Government of Haryana,
like as Additional Chief Secretary (Mines and Geology), Additional Chief Secretary (Industries
and Commerce), Additional Chief Secretary (Revenue and Disaster Management), Additional
Chief Secretary (Environment and Forests), Project Director of Haryana State AIDS Control
Society, Managing Director of Haryana State Industrial and Infrastructure Development
Corporation (HSIIDC) and as the Deputy Commissioner and District Magistrate of Hisar district
in the Haryana Government and as the Union Road Transport and Highways Secretary,
Chairman of National Highways Authority of India (NHAI), Special Secretary in NITI Aayog,
Chief Executive Officer (CEO) of Food Safety and Standards Authority of India (FSSAI) and as
a Joint Secretary in the Ministry of Corporate Affairs in the Union Government.
Yudhvir Singh Malik had been Chairman of the Haryana Khadi and Village Industries Board
without amending the Board Act, besides it as on December 20, 2012 he approved posting of
Technical Supervisor Leather from District to Head office, without disturbing another Technical
Supervisor Handmade Paper in the District as double standards and discrimination, besides it he
has concealed appeal against CE orders, which was moved by TSL working as DKVIO, whereas
he was duty bound to correct the legal partition of Haryana KVIB from Punjab KVIB adopting
proper partition and amendment in the Act existed, hence he needs immediate punishment,
placing him under suspension during Investigation of the matter.
Current Status Under process
Date of Action 01/03/2019
Officer concerns to:
Officer Name Dinesh Kumar
Officer Designation Assistant
Contact Address 4th floor Haryana Civil Secretariat
Email Address [email protected]
Contact Number 01722740118
39
 40

Details for registration number: DOPAT/E/2014/02598

Name of Complainant Naresh Kadian
Date of Receipt 20/10/2014
Received by Department of Personnel and Training
Grievance Description:
Yudhvir Singh Malik, IAS enjoyed top positions of Department of Industries Haryana during
Congress led Government and now his services were handed over to the Center as CEO of
FSSAI because they smell that Congress is not going to repeat back in power, after 2014
Assembly election, where as he had been in HSIDC and responsible for all wrong things,
malpractice, corruption and favoritism, hence top vigilance inquiry required of his tenure in
HSIDC and we demands white paper along with strict action against all offenders. For example
Media reports: Government auditor CAG has rapped the state-owned HSIIDC for accepting the
undervalued rate of land which was sold to real estate giant DLF Ltd for setting up a recreational
project in Gurgaon leading to a financial loss of Rs 438.91 crore. In its latest report on Haryana's
PSUs for the year 2011-12, CAG while auditing Haryana State Industrial and Infrastructure
Development Corporation Ltd (HSIIDC) observed that the valuation of the property which was
to be developed for recreation and leisure activities in Gurgaon was wrong. ILFS Infrastructure
Development Corporation, which was appointed as consultant for assessment of land cost (in
March 2008), valued the land cost by using a mixed approach which means multiplying average
market rate of land with average District Collector (DC) rate. "The value of property was worked
out at Rs 1,683.58 crore (by consultant) whereas the valuation of the property by considering
average factors of 2.79 times for residential area and 3.105 times for commercial plots works out
to Rs 2,142.11 crore," CAG said. However, HSIIDC approved the reserve price at Rs 1,700 crore
for bidding on the basis of the consultant's valuation while the government accepted the DLF's
bid at Rs 1,703.20 crore. "The company (HSIIDC) by accepting the consultant valuation without
any analysis and study suffered a loss of Rs 438.91 crore," CAG noted. HSIIDC invited bids for
sale of 350.715 acres of land in Gurgaon in January 2009 for setting up recreational and leisure
project. DLF Limited submitted the bid at Rs 12,000 per square meter, though it sought clearance
of legal and procedural complexities. The bids were again advertised in July 2009 for the same
project. Then Haryana's Town and Country Planning Department decided that additional Floor
Area Ratio (FAR) at the rate of 20 per cent of area should be allowed to the successful bidder. In
the second attempt, three bidders including DLF, Country Heights Holding Berhad and Unitech
showed interest in the project. But HSIIDC rejected the bids of Country Heights Holding Berhad
and Unitech for not fulfilling minimum criteria. The project ultimately went to DLF in February
2010. The HSIIDC management in the exit conference stated that the bid parameters along with
the benefit of extra 20 per cent FAR were revised before the re-advertisement and expenses on
getting clearance was the liability of DLF, and no financial burden accrued to HSIIDC. "The
reply was not convincing as HSIIDC had fixed the reserve price of the land on the lower side due
to wrong costing of land," CAG said. CAG also recommended that ILFC IDC should be
debarred from entering into any business with HSIIDC. Besides, the auditor has also found the
transfer of 253 acres out of total land of 350.715 acres of land under the proposed project in
violation of Punjab Land Preservation Act (PLPA). It is pertinent to mention here that Punjab
and Haryana High Court terminate the allotment of land to the DLF recently and he defended
Govt. in press conference, hence he may kindly be placed under suspension during investigation.
41
 42

Details for registration number: DOPAT/E/2013/01011

Name of Complainant Smt Sharda Kadyan
Date of Receipt 04/09/2013
Received by Department of Personnel and Training
Grievance Description:
Complaint against biased working of senior IAS officers in Haryana like Yudhvir Singh Malik,
Principal Secretary to Govt. of Haryana, Department of Industries along with all Chief Executive
officers of Haryana Khadi and Village Industries Board for not performing their official duties
and present system is compelling my husband Shri Naresh Kadyan, leading activist with
International reputation, either to resign or to get suicide because his pay and allowances are with
held under instructions of Yudhvir Singh Malik, IAS, baseless charge sheet needs attention, to be
quashed and inquiry against responsible IAS officers, needs to be punished, who with held pay
and allowances,not granting annual increment due as on 1-4-1995, not crossed efficiency bars,
not granting second ACP, regular annual increments to Naresh Kadyan, Technical Supervisor
(Leather) Haryana Khadi and Village Industries Board, revoke Naresh Kadyan suspension, after
90 days no charges are framed against Naresh Kadyan to justify the suspension, double standard
in Haryana one TS to head office but another one TS in field?, where as TS and DKVIO at par
with equal pay scale, all baseless charge sheets needs to be dropped with counter action against
baseless charges frame by the tainted IAS responsible for mental torture and unnecessary
harassment, suspension be revoked. My husband junior officials are getting much higher pay
scale and basic pay in Khadi Board, where as my husband is well qualified then existed staff of
the Board. If anything happen to my husband Naresh Kadyan then Yudhvir Singh Malik, IAS
along with all CE of Khadi Board, Haryana will be responsible.
Date of Action 20/02/2014
Remarks
Submitted in file No.104/41/2014-AVD.I on 20.02.2014
Officer concerns to:
Officer Name Ms. Anshu Sinha
Officer Designation Deputy Secretary
Contact Address North Block, New Delhi
43
 44

Details for registration number: DOPAT/E/2013/01078

Name of Complainant Smt Sharda Kadyan
Date of Receipt 18/09/2013
Received by Department of Personnel and Training
Grievance Description:
Complaint against Shri Yudhvir Singh Malik, IAS working as Principal Secretary to the Govt. of
Haryana (Department of Industries) holding this position since long, besides this position he had
been Chairman, Haryana Khadi and Village Industries Board, during his stay as Chairman he
managed illegal appointment of Shri R.K. Sharma in Haryana KVIB as Member Secretary in
addition to his position as Consultant in another Department, it would be pertinent to mention
here that R.K. Sharma was retired from Industries Department itself, after retirement then
Director Sh. T.L. Satparkash, IAS holding position as Chief Executive, Haryana KVIB along
with the MD, Haryana Small Industries and Export Corporation in addition and R.K. Sharma
was reappointed as Consultant in Export Corporation, other side as CE, KVIB asked Export
Corporation to appoint R.K. Sharma as Member Secretary, Haryana KVIB, only to do favoritism
of R.K. Sharma, this melafide activities needs attention. On December 20, 2012 Haryana Khadi
and Village Industries Board meeting was held under Chairmanship of Yudhvir Singh Malik, in
this meeting most competent, result oriented and well qualified Naresh Kadyan, who was
holding 7 positions as District Khadi and Village Industries Officer at Faridabad, Palwal, Mewat,
Gurgaon, Rewari, Narnaul along with the In charge Consignment Agency, Faridabad was placed
to Head Office at Panchkula being an original post as Technical Supervisor (Leather), where as
another Technical Supervisor (HMP) left unattended in the field offices as DKVIO in many
District, it was totally biased decision of KVIB under pressure of Yudhvir Malik to harass
Naresh Kadyan, double standard applied by Yudhvir Malik, IAS, these kinds of biased action
cannot be expected from a senior IAS officer. Hon'ble Chief Minister of Haryana passed order to
cancel the transfer orders of Naresh Kadyan from Faridabad to Panchkula but Yudhvir Singh
Malik managed this order to suspension of Naresh Kadyan misrepresenting and twisted the facts
before the CM Office, till date no charge sheet has been issued, baseless charge sheets has been
issued, two annual increments stopped, many annual increments with held along with 1-4-1995
annual increment, second ACP was not yet granted, efficiency bar not yet crossed, Naresh
Kadyan junior officials are getting more basic pay and pay scale then senior Naresh Kadyan,
who has been compelled to move voluntarily retirement from service, without any reason, many
time pay and suspension allowances are with held for a long period, applied Medical leave
rejected by the CE of KVIB under pressure of Yudhvir Malik. Hence a senior level officer may
kindly be deputed to inquire all the points, harassment and double standard applied in Haryana
Khadi and Village Industries Board, during inquiry Yudhvir Singh Malik, IAS may kindly be
posted in Delhi instead of Haryana for natural justice because as PS to Govt. of Haryana
(Department of Industries) I cannot expect any justice because he can managed the investigation.
Current Status Case Disposed of
Date of Action 20/02/2014
Remarks
Submitted in file No.104/41/2014-AVD.I on 20.02.2014
45
 46

Details for registration number: MORTH/E/2019/00634

Name of Complainant Naresh Kadyan
Date of Receipt 10/02/2019
Received by Ministry of Road Transport and Highways
Grievance Description:
Yudhvir Singh Malik (born 19 March 1959) is a 1984 batch IAS officer of Haryana cadre, he has
served in various key positions for both the Union Government and the Government of Haryana,
like as Additional Chief Secretary (Mines and Geology), Additional Chief Secretary (Industries
and Commerce), Additional Chief Secretary (Revenue and Disaster Management), Additional
Chief Secretary (Environment and Forests), Project Director of Haryana State AIDS Control
Society, Managing Director of Haryana State Industrial and Infrastructure Development
Corporation (HSIIDC) and as the Deputy Commissioner and District Magistrate of Hisar district
in the Haryana Government and as the Union Road Transport and Highways Secretary,
Chairman of National Highways Authority of India (NHAI), Special Secretary in NITI Aayog,
Chief Executive Officer (CEO) of Food Safety and Standards Authority of India (FSSAI) and as
a Joint Secretary in the Ministry of Corporate Affairs in the Union Government.
Yudhvir Singh Malik had been Chairman of the Haryana Khadi and Village Industries Board
without amending the Board Act, besides it as on December 20, 2012 he approved posting of
Technical Supervisor Leather from District to Head office, without disturbing another Technical
Supervisor Handmade Paper in the District as double standards and discrimination, besides it he
has concealed appeal against CE orders, which was moved by TSL working as DKVIO, whereas
he was duty bound to correct the legal partition of Haryana KVIB from Punjab KVIB adopting
proper partition and amendment in the Act existed, hence he needs immediate punishment,
placing him under suspension during Investigation of the matter.
Date of Action 14/03/2019
Remarks:
Your grievance has been forwarded to Cabinet Secretariat on 08.03.2019 vide DOPT OM No.
104/76/2011-AVD.I dated 18.10.2018 for necessary action. ( Letter attached)
Officer concerns to:
Officer Name Shri Rajesh Gupta
Officer Designation Deputy Secretary
Contact Address Transport Bhawan, 1, Parliament Street
Email Address [email protected]
Contact Number 23718527
 47

Details for registration number: DOPAT/E/2019/01453

Name of Complainant Naresh Kadyan
Date of Receipt 11/04/2019
Received by Ministry/Department Personnel and Training
Grievance Description:
Subject: Appeal against CE orders dated 4-9-2006 but dispatched on 5-10-2006 still pending.
Kind attention: Office of Lokpal to Govt. of India, DoPT.
Reference:
1. ACS Ind/CA/SDIT Deptt./2707 dated 5-3-2019.
2. HRB/Admn/EA-1/1735 dated 8-4-2019 Copy attached at P-4.
Kindly refer to then CE orders dated 4-9-2006 but why dispatched after 30 days as on 5-10-2006
bearing No. 11253 read with the appeal against the said orders still undecided even after personal
hearing before present Chairperson, even her decision conveyed on CM window 18948 dated 10-
2-2015, complaint moved to the Faridabad Police to lodge FIR as per decision being effected
person as breach of trust etc but report of Faridabad Police along with Board reply also needs
attention.
I offer my deducted amount with interest be donated to the Prime Minister Relief Fund being
Chowkidar as Justice delayed Justice denied, why should I suffer for nothing in Supervisory
capacity, when tainted subordinate staff were very much duty bound, then they should penalized,
bear the loss instead me
Please find attached here with all relevant evidences to grant me personal hearing to explain
orally as this matter is badly delayed, mishandled as well since beginning till today, inviting
unnecessary harassment, mental torture, financial loss with unnecessary litigations.
Current Status Under process
Date of Action 12/04/2019
Remarks
Officer concerns to:
Officer Name Shri Ashwini Dattatraya Thakre
Officer Designation Deputy Secretary
Contact Address NORTH BLOCK, NEW DELHI
 48

Details for registration number: GOVHY/E/2019/01714

Name of Complainant Naresh Kadyan
Date of Receipt 12/04/2019
Received by Ministry/Department Haryana
Grievance Description:
Subject: Appeal against CE orders dated 4-9-2006 but dispatched on 5-10-2006 still pending:
Intolerance with double standards during Congress Rule in Haryana.
Kind attention: Lokpal to Govt. of India, Cabinet Secretary with Department of Personnel and
Training, as annual Increments along with ACP benefits were not released after order dated 4-9-
2006, dispatched on 5-10-2006, created major hardship, great mental torture with financial loss,
besides it appeal against order dated 4-9-2006 also claimed to be decided on 22-3-2018, badly
delay of a period more than 12 years, whereas Faridabad Police refused to lode FIR, keeping in
view orders passed by the Chairperson as on 22-3-2018.
Reference: ACS Ind/CA/SDIT Deptt./2707 dated 5-3-2019 - HRB/Admn/EA-1/1735 dated 8-4-
2019.
Kindly refer to then CE orders dated 4-9-2006 but why dispatched after 30 days as on 5-10-2006
bearing No. 11253 read with the appeal against the said orders still undecided even after personal
hearing before present Chairperson, even her decision conveyed on CM window 18948 dated 10-
2-2015, complaint moved to the Faridabad Police to lodge FIR as per decision being effected
person as breach of trust etc but report of Faridabad Police along with Board reply also needs
attention.
I offer my deducted amount with interest be donated to the Prime Minister Relief Fund being
Chowkidar as Justice delayed Justice denied, why should I suffer for nothing in Supervisory
capacity, when tainted subordinate staff were very much duty bound, then they should penalized,
bear the loss instead me
Please find attached here with all relevant evidences to grant me personal hearing to explain
orally as this matter is badly delayed, mishandled as well since beginning till today, inviting
unnecessary harassment, mental torture, financial loss with unnecessary litigations, pain &
sufferings.
Current Status Under process
Date of Action 25/04/2019
Remarks
Please enquire into the matter take necessary action and attach a report
Officer concerns to:
Officer Name CP Faridabad
Officer Designation IGP
Contact Address Faridabad
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
 65

To, 015048 February 6, 2019

Chairperson, Haryana Khadi & VI Board, Panchkula via CM window

Subject: Appeal against CE orders dated 4-9-2006, dispatched vide No. 11253 dated 5-10-2006

Reference: DKVIO Dispatch No. 254 dated 16-10-2006 & 258-59 dated 16-10-2006, still pending.

Greetings,

Kindly refer to the above said appeal before then Administrative Secretary cum Chairman along
with the re-consideration application before then Chief Executive of the Board, the decision on the
same still pending, whereas personal hearing was granted, all evidences were placed on record but
Hon’ble Chairperson decision on the CM window 18948 dated 10-2-2015, conveyed vide letter No.
1909-1914 dated 22-3-2018, whereas I never moved said CM window 18948 dated 10-2-2015 before
the Chairperson of the Board, besides it I moved complaint before the Faridabad Police to take
cognizance on the decision conveyed by the Chairperson of the Board. In continuation KVIB letter
No. 6270 dated 9-8-2018, which was addressed to the Faridabad Police, KVIB placed on record that
Chief Executive Order, conveyed on dated 5-10-2006 were challenged as appeal and same was filed
by the Appellate Authority Chairperson of the board, which is not true because:

1. Personal hearing was granted as on 1-3-2017, I was very much present, heard by then Chief
Executive, No decision was taken due to absence of then Chairman.
2. Personal hearing was again granted as on 12-12-2017 but till today No decision has been
conveyed, which was taken as on 12-12-2017 by the Appellate Authority, besides it many
representations are being sent regularly.

In fact, there was a great hardship, double standards applied being sufferers of heavy financial loss
and mental torture for a long period because all regular service benefits as annual increments with
ACP’s needs to be released at once, while passing order dated 4-9-2006, conveyed on 5-10-2006 but
it was not done till under protest voluntary retirement. It’s very funny as No responsibilities fixed
on the tainted black sheep’s of the system.

As per orders conveyed by the Chairperson on dated 22-3-2018 read with the material supplied to
the Faridabad Police, matter was dropped and no cognizance was taken, hence the allegations
leveled in the said orders have No material, in the eye of the Faridabad Police.

Whereas Junior Auditor is No more, besides it Gautam Dutt, Clerk very much in the service of the
Board and both officials accepted their guilt, not moved any appeal against orders dated 4-9-2006,
conveyed on 5-10-2006 but I still protesting against unlawful and illegal deduction, appeal after
personal hearing also not decided as there was No allegation of embezzlement against me, only
breach of trust committed by the duty bound subordinate officials, for their guild I can’t be held
responsible, hence impugned order dated 4-9-2006, conveyed as on 5-10-2006 may kindly be set-
aside, releasing deducting amount without any further delay for natural justice. All concerned
papers are attached here with as ready references. Justice delayed Justice denied.

Yours in Scouting’s, Naresh Kadyan, TSL (VRS under protest)

 66

Details for registration number : MORTH/E/2019/01757

Name of Complainant Naresh Kadyan

Date of Receipt 28/04/2019
Received by Ministry of Road Transport and Highways
Grievance Description
Kind attention: Lokpal to Govt. of India via Ministry of Road Transport & Highways against Yudhvir Singh
Malik, IAS, Secretary of the Ministry.
Subject: Appeal against CE orders dated 4-9-2006 but dispatched on 5-10-2006 still pending. If anything
happened adverse without oral hearing on Yudhvir Malik Note then he be responsible.
Kind attention: Lokpal to Govt. of India, Cabinet Secretary with Department of Personnel and Training, as
annual Increments along with ACP benefits were not released after order dated 4-9-2006, dispatched on 5-10-
2006, created major hardship, great mental torture with financial loss, besides it appeal against order dated 4-9-
2006 also claimed to be decided on 22-3-2018, badly delay of a period more than 12 years, whereas Faridabad
Police refused to lode FIR, keeping in view orders passed by the Chairperson as on 22-3-2018, whereas I was
penalize for lac of Supervision instead embezzlement, which claimed by Yudhvir Malik forcibly against law
being biased adopting double standards.
Reference:
1. ACS Ind/CA/SDIT Deptt./2707 dated 5-3-2019 - HRB/Admn/EA-1/1735 dated 8-4-2019.
2. Cabinet Secretariat ID No. 501/VI/08/2019-VCC dated 23-4-2019.
3. Road Transport & Highways ID No. A-46015/1/2019-E.1 dated 8-3-2019 with Note of Yudhvir Singh Malik as
Secretary of the Ministry with fabricated - false facts.
Kindly refer to then CE orders dated 4-9-2006 but why dispatched after 30 days as on 5-10-2006 bearing No.
11253 read with the appeal against the said orders still undecided even after personal hearing before present
Chairperson, even her decision conveyed on CM window 18948 dated 10-2-2015, complaint moved as
GOVHY/E/2018/00943 on 30-3-2018 to the Faridabad Police to lodge FIR as per decision being effected person
as breach of trust etc but report of Faridabad Police along with Board reply also needs attention.
I offer my deducted amount with interest be donated to the Prime Minister Relief Fund being Chowkidar as
Justice delayed Justice denied, why should I suffer for nothing in Supervisory capacity, when tainted
subordinate staff were very much duty bound, then they should penalized, bear the loss instead me
Please find attached here with all relevant evidences to grant me personal hearing to explain orally as this
matter is badly delayed, mishandled as well since beginning till today, inviting unnecessary harassment, mental
torture, financial loss with unnecessary litigation, pain & sufferings.
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87