Fulltext01 PDF
Fulltext01 PDF
Fulltext01 PDF
Microcredit in Pakistan
Adnan Ali
M. Ashan Alam
University West
Sweden. We would like to express our many thanks to all who have helped to this
thesis possible. We would like to thanks to Suzanne, Dahlberg helping in our thesis.
We would like to special thank our supervisor José Ferraz Nunes who helped us
during our thesis work. We are thankful to everybody working at University West who
Microcredit provides small loans to poor people and small enterprises. It is the best
solution of removing poverty. This research provides an overview of the role and
performance of microcredit in Pakistan. The major objective of the study is to show
the microfinance sector performance and impact of the microcredit on the different
poverty levels. This study is based on both quantitative and qualitative methods in
order to answer the thesis questions. The result of the study was that microcredit
helps in the poverty alleviation of different categories of poor people and has the
positive effects on their living standards. It was found that there is a high interest rate
on micro loans because of the administrative cost. We discovered that there are
three types of organizations that provide services of microfinance in Pakistan. The
government takes interest and supports the microfinance sector and of their main
initiative is microfinance ordinance 2001. It was observed that there is improvement
in the microfinance sector in the recent years in terms of investments, active
borrowers, branches and personnel.
Table of Contents
Chapter: 1
1.0 Introduction……………….……………………………………………………………………………………….5
1.2 History of microcredit…….……………………………………………………………………………………6
1.3 Background of Pakistan….……………………………………………………………………………………8
1.4.1 Poverty in Pakistan……………..................................................................................9
1.5 Purpose of the study…………………………………………………………………………………………..11
1.6 Limitation of the study………………………………………………………………………………………..11
1.7 Outline of research……………………………………………………………………………………………..12
Chapter: 2
2.0 Literature review ………………………………………………………………………………………………..13
2.1 Concept of microfinance………………………………………………………………........................13
2.2 Characteristics of microfinance ………..…………………………………………………………………13
2.3 Microcredit as development tool………………………………………………………...................14
2.4 Microfinance institutions.........................................................................................15
2.5 Users of microfinance..............................................................................................15
2.6 Islamic microfinance…………………………………………………………………….........................16
2.7 Role of microcredit in poverty alleviation……………..................................................16
2.8 Micro entrepreneurship.......................................................................................... 17
2.9 Grameen model.......................................................................................................17
2.10 Microfinance provides empowerment........................................... ..................... 18
Chapter: 3
3.0 Method and material…………………………………………………………………………………………..20
3.1 Research strategy………………………………………………………………………………………………..20
3.2 Data collection………………………………………………………………………….............................21
3.3 Secondary data …………………………………………………………………………............................22
Chapter: 4
4.1.1 Role of microcredit in poverty alleviation…………………………………………………………..23
4.1.2 Interest rate on micro credit…………………………………………………….………..................25
4.1.3 Government initiatives in microfinance……………………………………………………………..26
4.1.4 Microfinance provider in Pakistan……………………………………………………………………..27
4.1.5 Pakistan microfinance network…………….…………………………………………………… ……..28
4.2.1 Pakistan poverty alleviation fund…………………………………………………….............. …..29
4.2.2 Growth in branches and personnel…………………………….................................. …….33
4.2.3 Increase in the investment of microfinance sector…………………………….............. …34
4.2.4 Growth rate of active borrowers…………………………………………………….....................35
Chapter: 5
5.0 Conclusion…………………………………………………………………………………………………………….37
Chapter: 6
6.0 Discussion and Further research…………………………………………………………………………..39
Chapter: 7
7.0 References……………………………………………………………………………………………………………41
5
1 Introduction
1.0 Introduction
The microcredit approach is not so new. In the mid 1800s, individualist anarchist
Lysander Spooner wrote about the benefits of numerous small loans for
entrepreneurial activities to the poor as a way to alleviate poverty
(Lysanderspooner.org). The importance of micro loans is a very old phenomena but
microcredit is became very popular and in organized ways in the mid 70s by the
professor of economics Dr Muhammad Yunus, a noble prize winner in (2006) in
Bangladesh. When Muhammad Yunus realized that there was a whole sea of would-
be entrepreneurs among the poor of his country. These were people who could be
running thriving businesses but who could not start their startups due to a lack of
capital. He endeavored to find ways of getting this startup capital to people who
needed it. He quickly discovered that credit-lending institutions in Bangladesh were
not providing the loans to poor without any collateral. So he finally established a bank
that would take on risky propositions, and lend out a few hundred dollars at a time to
individuals to start small businesses.
Microfinance is defined as formal scheme designed to improve the well being of poor
through better access to saving and services loans (Schreiner, 2000).
7
The difference between microcredit and microfinance is that microcredit refers to very
small loans for unsalaried borrowers with little or no collateral, provided by legally
registered institutions. Currently, consumer credit provided to salaried workers based
on automated credit scoring is usually not included in the definition of microcredit,
although this may change. Microfinance typically refers to microcredit, savings,
insurance, money transfers, and other financial products targeted at poor and low-
income people (microfinancegateway.org).
The term ‗microfinance‘ has been used interchangeably with ‗microcredit‘ in Pakistan,
largely because other services and products in the sector have been far less
developed than credit. Savings and insurance, for example, are still in their infancy as
far as their provision by microfinance institutions is concerned, and even some
microfinance banks have been slow to evolve their savings instruments and potential.
Debate about microfinance in Pakistan continues to be largely about microcredit
(Haroon Jamal, 2008).
Definitions of micro credit differ, of course, from country to country. Some of the
defining criteria used include –size-loans are micro, or very small in size target users
–micro entrepreneurs and low-income households utilization-the use of funds –for
income generation, and enterprise development , but also for community use (
health/ education) etc. Terms and conditions –most terms and conditions for
microcredit loans are flexible and easy to understand, and suited to the local
conditions of the community. The word microcredit did not exist before the seventies.
Now it has become a buzz-word among the development practitioners. In the
process, the word has been imputed to mean everything to everybody. No one now is
shocked if somebody uses the term microcredit to mean agricultural credit, or rural or
8
cooperative credit, or consumer credit, credit from the savings and loan associations,
or from credit unions, or from money lenders. When someone claims microcredit has
a thousand year history, or a hundred year history, nobody finds it as an exciting
piece of historical information (Grameen –info.org).
Pakistan became independent in August 14, 1947 after a long political struggle
against British regime. Pakistan is located in very important strategic location in
South Asia, share eastern border with India, north eastern border with China, while
south-west border with Iran and Afghanistan is at western and northern edge.
Country has total area 796,095 sq km. administratively, country is divided in four
provinces, Sindh, Punjab, Balochistan and NWFP, with tribal area (Federal
Administrative Tribal Area-FATA), Azad Jammu and Kashmir and Federal Territory
Islamabad. Country has total 153.96 inhabitant contributing 2.5 percent of world
population and 2nd largest country by population with PGR 1.8 percent (SBP Annual
report). Sixty five percent of total population is living rural areas while 35% in urban
areas. (Pakistan-―Some Basic Facts‖-2008)
In Pakistan various different languages are being spoken, more than 55 languages.
English is the official language and used in business, offices, education, and
government etc. Urdu is the national language of Pakistan. The other major four
languages that are used in four provinces are Panjabi, Pustho, Sindhi and Balochi.
In Pakistan, the majority of the population is Muslim, about 95% and other 5% of
population belongs to Christianity, Hinduism, Sikhs and Parsis.
The health sector in Pakistan is progressing during the last few years in term of per
capita health spending, life expectancy, infant and maternal mortality rates, provision
of immunization to children, provision of human and physical health infrastructure.
Life expectancy is low in Pakistan, 63.2 years for males and 63.6 in females,
compare with other regional countries like 71.7 in male in Sri Lanka 70.2 in China.
This low average in life expectancy in Pakistan is due to poverty, low health
spending, lack of infrastructure and lack of awareness. Pakistan is using US$18 per
capita for health which is very less than that of recommended minimum amount of
US$34 set by WHO (SBP-a, 2007).
9
Education figures are not encouraging in Pakistan. Now the country‘s literacy rate is
54 percent which is still behind from other neighboring countries like Indian with 61
percent and Sri Lanka 90 percent. Currently, there are 0.23 million educational
institutions in the country where 33.38 million students are enrolled and 1.35 million
teaching staff are serving. While among these institutions, 0.08 million institutions are
working in private sector where 0.632 million teaching staff are employed.
Government is spending 1.84 % of total GDP on education (SBP-a, 2007).
In Pakistan poverty has many dimensions. The poor in Pakistan have not only low
income but they also lack access to basic needs such as education, health, clean
drinking water and proper sanitation. The latter undermines and limits their
capabilities, limits their opportunities to secure employment, results in their social
exclusion and exposes them to exogenous shocks. Then the vicious cycle of poverty
is accentuated when then government structures exclude the most vulnerable from
the decision making process. Poverty is one of the most important problems that are
faced by country. But due to increase of economic activities and policies of the
government, there are some good numbers came on poverty and poverty reduction.
In Pakistan, 24 % of the people live below the poverty line which was 34% in 2000-
01. Poverty ratio almost is double in rural areas compared to urban. For example, in
2006 the poverty ratio was 14.96%, while in rural areas, it is 28% (SBP-a, 2007).
Table 1 presents extremely poor in the country is 1.1 % in 2001 and 1 % in 2005,
Ultra poor is10.8 % in 2001 and 6.5 % in 2005 and poor is 22.5 % in 2001 and 16.4
in 2005.
TABLE 1
Microcredit is not new in Pakistan but relatively young compared to other countries in
the region. Initially microfinance started in 1960 by the agriculture banks, provide
loans to the poor farmer to gain fertilizers, yielding seeds and machinery etc. in the
early 1980s Aga Khan Rural Support Program (AKRSP) start its credit operation to
the poor people by providing financial and social services. But know large number of
organization work as a microfinance provider to poor people with objective of
improving their income and living standards. It is considered one of the effective tools
of poverty alleviation and helping the poor people. According to one estimate, there
are about 20 to 30 Million clients requiring Micro Finance services in Pakistan
(Pakistan microfinance network). Starting the program Pakistan poverty alleviation
fund by the government of Pakistan is the key step to the microfinance. Some other
micro finance institutions are banks such as Khushhali Bank and Bank of Khyber,
nonprofit organization such as Islamic relief micro project and Rural Support
Programmes etc, are also important microfinance provider institution.
11
The purpose of this thesis is to understand the detail procedure and work of micro
credit and the main goals and objectives to introduce micro loans.
We have two main questions of our thesis the first one is the role and organization of
micro credit in Pakistan. In the first part we are going to explain what microcredit is
and how it works, the main users of the micro credit and the interest rates on these
micro loans. We analyze the different types of microfinance institution in Pakistan.
We also focus on how microcredit helps in the removing of poverty alleviation and
access of the microcredit to poor people and the role of government of Pakistan in
microfinance sector.
The limitation of our study is to get the primary data. This study is conducted in
Sweden and here it is very difficult to get the primary data from Pakistan. That‘s why
we depended on the secondary data. We don‘t have our own calculations to answer
the question and we are depended on the other result and calculations.
12
2 Literature review
In this section we present different theories of previous research in microfinance. We
explain microfinance, how it works, its role and user, and contribution in poverty
alleviation.
4. Installments made up of both principal and interest, which is amortized over the
course of time.
5. Higher interest rates on credit (higher than commercial bank rates but lower than
loan-shark rates), which reflect the labor-intensive work associated with making small
loans and allowing the microfinance intermediary to become sustainable over time.
6. Easy entrance to the microfinance intermediary saves the time and money of the
client and permits the intermediary to have a better idea about the clients‘ financial
and social status.
8. Short processing periods (between the completion of the application and the
disbursements of the loan).
9. The clients who pay on time become eligible for repeat loans with higher amounts.
10. The use of tapered interest rates (decreasing interest rates over several loan
cycles) as an incentive to repay on time. Larger loans are less costly to the MFI, so
some lenders provide large size loans on relatively lower rates.
especially for women. Women are become more empowered and play important role
in generating income in the rural areas of Pakistan.
In most developing countries, policies for rural financial development have been
based on three erroneous beliefs concerning their target groups: 1. rural micro-
entrepreneurs are unable to recognize themselves, 2. they are too poor to save; and
3. they need cheap credit for their income-generating activities or small enterprises
(Harper, M, 2003). The microfinance company analyzes the need of their target
customer that they required small loans in term of microcredit to sustain their small
enterprises.
There are now nearly 70 million poor people who are getting benefits from 2500
micro finance institutions in over 100 countries by microfinance (Sengupta,
Aubuchon, 2008). This fact shows how microcredit is important and useful, and how
16
a huge number of people are facilitated by the microfinance institutions. This is the
reason is that microfinance is gaining importance as an effective tool of social
mobilization and poverty alleviation.
According to Islamic law (sharia) the payments or acceptance of interest fees are
prohibited for the lending of money. But the borrower will share the profit, which he
gets from the business with the lender.
The phenomenon of poverty was felt and observed more during the decade of 1990s,
as the overall growth slowed down. While the slower economic growth contributed to
poverty, the ―trickle-down effect‖ once thought to improve living conditions, did not
reach the lowest level owing largely to lack of accessibility of institutions, unjust and
17
non-poor policies (Waheed, 2001). Poverty has been a major challenge since the
known civilization came into existence. After the 1990s the poverty rate rose in the
economy, and to control it, microcredit is the one of the best tools. Large numbers of
poor people have improved their income as well as contribute to national economy.
There are two types of microfinance borrowers; one is a Micro borrower and the
other, a Micro entrepreneur. A micro borrower has mind like capitalist who is aim to
earn profit while doing business. So a micro borrower gets finances from MFIs (Micro
Finance Institutions), and after paying back, again they will get finances but only if the
motive is to generate profit but not any entrepreneurial achievement. On the other
hand, a micro entrepreneur finances their business and brings innovation, creativity
and doing a different from others (Mondal, p.3).
Muhammad Yens interviewed a woman who had a small business of making bamboo
benches. Due to the shortage of the resources to purchase the raw materials, she
was forced to borrow small amounts of money from a local lender. Without any
collateral, she could only borrow enough money to buy the raw materials to build one
piece at a time. The woman had to repay the lender with high interest rates.
Sometimes the interest rate of that loan exceeded 10% of the principal amount. After
repaying the lender, the woman was left with a profit margin that was not enough to
even meet her basic daily needs. Had she had access to more complimentary terms
for her loan, she would have been able to save enough money to protect her from
future uncertainties and in the long run, would have been able to raise herself above
the survival level. Discouraged by what he saw, Dr. Yunus took matters into his own
hands and lent a small amount of money as a loan to some 42 rural basket-weavers.
He found that these small loans went a long way, and almost everyone who had
borrowed the money, were keen to repay their loans. Dr. Yunus found out that even
with this tiny amount of money it is possible not only to help the poor to survive but
also to create the spark of personal initiative and enterprise in the people, necessary
to pull themselves out of poverty (Roy, Mark, A, 2003).
gathering the ability to determine the choice of life. This adds to the command over
resources outwit insubordination and signify their social role‖.
3 Methodology
3.0 Method and material
We used qualitative methods for our research questions as we deal with literature,
articles, internet, numerical and non-numerical data. We mostly concentrate on the
years from 1999 to 2005 for statistical data through which we analyze the
performance of microfinance. We look at the growth rate of the potential borrower of
micro credit and also look at the investment growth in the microfinance institutions.
Information we get from the statistical data and the information we get from the
microfinance organization employ and borrower of microfinance will get us the
answer the question of our thesis.
The research approach of our thesis is to indentify the role of microcredit in removing
poverty in poor peoples, and also shows the achievements of the microcredit in
Pakistan.
We first use the qualitative method for our research questions. The first question of
our thesis consists of a theoretical portion. We examine the role of microcredit in
Pakistan. What are the interest rates apply on these loans. What are the different
types of microfinance institution work in Pakistan and the government role in
microfinance industry? For our second thesis question we use qualitative methods
based on quantitative data and quantitative analysis performed in the literature. We
use the past statistical data to analyze the performance of micro finance sector.
Our research model is based on the different status of poverty line such as extremely
poor, ultra poor, poor, vulnerable, quasi non-poor and non-poor. To present the effect
of microcredit on these poverty bands, categorizations of the households into
different poverty bands is based on the definitions given in The Economic Survey
(2006-2007).
The net impact of micro credit borrower is derived from the given formula.
21
There are many ways to get the information to answer the research questions. The
ideal way would be to collect information from different sources and including all
kinds of necessary information. To select the proper and correct method of
information several steps has been taken including analysis and reporting resources,
resources available, credibility and competence of evaluator etc.
We collected the statistical data and literature from different resources which helped
to answer our thesis questions. We collected the statistical data from the Pakistan
microfinance network, Pakistan poverty alleviation fund, performance of micro credit
in Pakistan and internet. This statistical data consist of the number of active
borrowers, assets, investment, branches and employees of microfinance institutions.
We get to use this data to analyze the performance of microfinance sector. To find
out the micro credit help in removing poverty of people by comparing data of different
years to know about the improvement in the active borrower‘s, investments, new
microfinance braches and personnel. We look at the different micro financial
institutions works in Pakistan, and looking their role in poverty alleviation. These
institution statistical data is very reliable and relevant to our research topic. These
institutions have large data and research on the microcredit.
22
We used most of the secondary data in our thesis from several sources. Secondary
data sources have sharper critical information that is already proven and researched
by the researcher.
We got the secondary data from the Microfinance network, State Bank of Pakistan,
Pakistan poverty alleviation fund, and Sarhad rural support programs. This data is
very reliable and valid to answer our thesis question. This secondary data includes all
the facts and figures derived by the researcher to make performance reports and
annual reports of the microfinance institution. We will use this statistical data to
analyze the micro finance sector performance and achievements in Pakistan. We
compare the statistical data of one year with different years to know about the
progress of micro finance sector. In our research we also use university data base
which is good source of online books and articles.
23
4 Results
4.1 Role and organization of microcredit
4.1.1 Role of micro credit in poverty alleviation
Nowadays, the world faces the daunting challenge of poverty reduction. The world
has 2.8 billion people living on less than 2 dollars a day and 1.2 billion people living
on less than 1 dollar a day. Of these 1.2 billion people, 500 million people live in
South Asia (microcredit summit, 2004). Microfinance helps the government‘s aim of
removing poverty by providing financial help to small business and poor people.
The General Assembly of the United Nations has recognized the positive impact of
microcredit in poverty reduction. Microfinance impact studies have demonstrated
that:
1. Microfinance helps poor households meet basic needs and protects them against
risks.
4. The level of impact relates to the length of time clients have had access to financial
services.
Women
Empowerment
- Better nutrition
- Health opportunities ↑
- Access to education ↑
- ↑ In female
economic
participation
-Increase in productivity
- Gender equality
-↑ in per capita income
-↑ Role in family
decisions
Improvement in standard
of living (SOL)
-↓ Fertility rate
-↑ in family well-
being
-Increase in consumption
of goods and services
-Aggregate Demand ↑
Small population Size
-↑ in investment and
employment
Better provision of opportunities
health and education -Aggregate Supply↑
Services
The interest rates charged on the microcredit loans is higher than other loans. This
happens because the credit services provided are for small sums of money and the
cost of these small loans makes the interest on them very high .For example, a single
loan of 100,000 taken from a commercial bank is a small transaction cost, while the
same amount of loan given to more persons by microfinance institutions have higher
transaction and administrative costs.
"There are three kinds of costs the microfinance institution has to cover when it
makes microloans. The first two, the cost of the money that it lends and the cost of
loan defaults, are proportional to the amount lent. For instance, if the cost paid by the
MFI for the money it lends is 10%, and it experiences defaults of 1% of the amount
lent, then these two costs will total $11 for a loan of $100, and $55 for a loan of $500.
An interest rate of 11% of the loan amount thus covers both these costs for either
loan.
The third type of cost, transaction costs, is not proportional to the amount lent. The
transaction cost of the $500 loan is not much different from the transaction cost of the
$100 loan. Both loans require roughly the same amount of staff time for meeting with
the borrower to appraise the loan, processing the loan disbursement and
repayments, and follow-up monitoring. Suppose that the transaction cost is $25 per
loan and that the loans are for one year. To break even on the $500 loan, the MFI
would need to collect interest of $50 + 5 + $25 = $80, which represents an annual
interest rate of 16%. To break even on the $100 loan, the MFI would need to collect
interest of $10 + 1 + $25 = $36, which is an interest rate of 36%. At first glance, a
rate this high looks abusive to many people, especially when the clients are poor. But
in fact, this interest rate simply reflects the basic reality that when loan sizes get very
small, transaction costs loom larger because these costs can't be cut below certain
minimums." (CGAP)
26
The simplified formula for calculating interest rates for financial sustainability (GCAP,
2002b) is:
R = AE + LL + CF + K – II
1 – LL
Where:
R is the effective annualised interest rate
AE is administrative expenses
LL is loan losses
CF is the cost of funds
K is the desired capitalization rate, and
II is investment income.
The government, with the lending support of the Asian Development Bank, also
supported the creation of the Khushhali Bank. This was the first retail microfinance
bank in Pakistan, owned by a group of private and public commercial banks. In
addition to this project, ADB support has resulted in the establishment of several
funds available to regulated microfinance banks, such as the Social Development
27
Fund, the Community Investment Fund, a Risk Mitigation Fund and a Deposit
Protection Fund (bwtp.org).
There are three types of microfinance providers in Pakistan and further it has
expanded to different organizations.
1 Microfinance banks
The large number of population in rural areas faces problems of access to the loans
from commercial banks. MFBs were founded with the objective that poor people have
access to the loans. Now MFBs have high progress in providing loan and financial
service to poor. The Khushhali bank is the one of the most leading and most
successful bank in microfinance sector. The state bank of Pakistan gives license and
set the regulation for MFBs to exclusive service in microfinance market. There are six
MFBs working currently in Pakistan which is Khushhali Bank (KB), Tameer
Microfinance Bank Ltd. (TMFB), Rozgar Microfinance Bank Ltd. (RMFB) , The First
Microfinance Bank Ltd. (FMFB), Network MicroFinance Bank Ltd. (NMFB), and Pak-
Oman Microfinance Bank Ltd (POMFB).
2 Microfinance institutions
RSPs programs run microfinance as a part of their multidimensional program for rural
development. SRSP is the most successful rural program. The other RSPs is
28
National Rural Support Program (NRSP), Lachi Poverty Reduction Project (LPRP),
Thardeep Rural Development Program (TRDP), and, Punjab Rural Support Program
(PRSP).
In the past, PMN has organised training courses in market research, credit
methodologies, management skills, business planning and financial modelling and
29
others. For 2004, it proposes nine training courses, run by Pakistan practitioners and
international trainers in gender, financial management, credit operations, and
business development services.
PMN started in 1999 to promote transparency among its members, asking them to
self-report their performance indicators, which are then aggregated, analysed and
published bi-annually as a nation-wide report, the Performance Indicators Report. It is
widely acknowledged that PMN is one of the leading national networks in the world in
managing and producing performance indicators for the microfinance industry.
The Pakistan poverty alleviation fund was started in 2000. Their aim is poverty
alleviation by providing funds through the NGOs and community based organizations.
Initially, PPAF had signed agreements with five Partner Organizations (POs) to
disburse Rs. 5 billion over the next five years. These five POs are: Taraqee Trust,
Quetta (Balochistan), Agha Khan Rural Support Program (AKRSP), Gilgit (Northern
Areas), National Rural Support Organization (NRSP), Islamabad (Federal Area),
Family Planning Association of Pakistan (FPAP), Lahore (Punjab) and Kashf
Foundation, Lahore (Punjab). The target population of the PPAF project is poor and
disadvantaged rural and urban communities. The benefits of the project will accrue
directly to poor through: (a) income generation opportunities; (b) improved community
30
physical infrastructure in the underserved areas; and (c) greater economic integration
of women (Shirazi, Khan, 2009).
The World Bank funded Pakistan Poverty Alleviation Fund Project was designed to
reduce poverty and empower the rural and urban poor in Pakistan. The project
provides access to much-needed microcredit loans and grants for infrastructure and
capacity building. As such, the PPAF project aims to help the rural poor in Pakistan
get out of a cycle of misery, and get into a virtuous cycle of opportunities.
(worldbank.org)
In Table 2, the poverty level is taken in different groups from the category of the
household into different poverty bands and is based on the definitions given in The
Economic Survey (2006-2007), such as poverty line, extremely poor, ultra poor, poor,
vulnerable, quasi non-poor and non-poor. The estimation is taken for the different
poverty levels of sample borrowers for the year 2003 and 2004 e.g. for poverty line is
taken Rs 832.22 and 30.58 % was the estimated head count.
It reveals that 2.82 percent of the sample was extremely poor (whose income is less
than 50% of the poverty line), 10.42 percent was ultra poor and 17.34 percent of the
sample was poor. The first three categories of poverty bands aggregate to 30.58
percent of the remaining data, 16.83 percent of was identified as vulnerable, 37.17
percent as quasi non-poor and 15.42 percent of the sample as non-poor. Using the
poverty line of Rs. 878.64, we also estimated the poverty level of the sample
borrowers for the year 2004-05. It was found that poverty incidence was 23.99
percent. This shows an appreciable decline (6.61 percent) in poverty as compared to
the last year. It further implies that the PPAF micro credit, in addition to other factors,
has played a positive role in poverty alleviation. The overall households are further
decomposed in different poverty bands. The last column of Table 2 shows the
change in poverty status across different poverty bands. A decline of 1.22
percentage points has been recorded in the extremely poor households, while it was
4.60 and 0.77 percentage points in case of ultra poor and poor households
31
TABLE 2
Poverty states of borrowers
% of % of %
2003-2004 HH 2004-2005 HH Difference
Poverty Line (PL) Poverty Line (PL)
Rs. 838.32 per month 30.58 Rs. 878.64 per month 23.99 (–) 6.61
Extremely poor Extremely poor
< 50%, i.e. < 50%, i.e.
(below Rs. 419.11) 2.82 (below Rs. 439.32) 1.6 (–) 1.22
Ultra Poor Ultra Poor
> 50% < 75%, i.e. > 50% < 75%, i.e.
(Rs. 419.11-Rs. 628.66) 10.42 (Rs. 439.32-Rs. 658.98) 5.82 (–) 4.6 0
Poor Poor
> 75% < 100 %, i.e. > 75% < 100%, i.e.
(Rs.628.66-Rs. 838.32) 17.34 (Rs. 658.98-Rs. 878.64) 16.57 (–) 0.77
Vulnerable Poor
> 100% < 125%, i.e. > 100% < 125%, i.e.
(Rs. 838.32-Rs. (Rs. 878.64-Rs.
1047.87) 16.83 1098.30) 15.68 (–) 1.15
Quasi Non-Poor Quasi Non-Poor
> 125% < 200 %, i.e. >125%< 200 %, i.e.
(Rs. 1047.87-Rs. (Rs. 1098.3-Rs.
1676.64) 37.17 1757.28) 40.42 (+) 3.25
Non-Poor Non-Poor
> 200%, i.e. > 200%, i.e.
(Rs. 1676.64 & above) 15.42 (Rs. 1757.28 & above) 19.71 (+) 4.29
Source: Pakistan Economic and Social Review Volume 47, No. 2 (Winter 2009), pp. 215-228
Note: A negative sign indicates a decline and a positive sign stands for an Increase
percent were ultra poor and 16.26 percent of the samples were in the category of
poor in 2003-04. This aggregates to 29.32 percent of the non-borrowers. Again 18.50
percent of the households were identified as vulnerable, 37.07 percent as quasi non-
poor and 15.11 percent of the sample as non-poor in the same year. Comparing the
poverty status of the non-borrowers in different poverty bands during 2003-04 and
2004-05, Table 3 shows that the number of households in the extremely poor band
had declined by 1.85 percentage points (from 4.03 percent in 2003-04 to 2.18
percent in 2004-05), while in case of ultra poor the decline was substantial (3.15
percent). However in case of poor there was an increase (1.46 percent) in the
poverty status of the households from 16.26 percent to17.72 percent during the same
period. With the exception of vulnerable group, which has shown a decline of 2.92
percentage points, all other households who were in higher income groups (quasi
non-poor and non-poor) have shown an increase over the reported period (see Table
3) (Shirazi ,Khan ,2009).
TABLE 3
% of % of %
2003-2004 HH 2004-2005 HH Difference
Table 4 shows the impact of PPAF microcredit on poverty status of the borrowers,
this has been derived from the last column of table 2 and table 3 values on formula
explain earlier in methodology chapter. It shows that overall poverty level is reduced
to 3.07 % with the help of PPAF microcredit. Poverty level of extremely poor has
been raised 0.63 %, present no effect of micro credit on these house hold .but the
poverty level of ultra poor has been reduced to 1.45 % and poor group has reduced
poverty to 2.23 % which shows positive impact of micro credit. A vulnerable and non-
poor group has been increased poverty to 1.77 % and 2.25 % respectively. The quasi
non-poor have decreased poverty to 1.17.
TABLE 4
Source: Calculated from Table 2 and Table 3 by Pakistan Economic and Social Review Volume 47, No.
2 (Winter 2009), pp. 215-228
sector in the achievement of potential customer and also increasing in the total
number of active borrowers.
TABLE 5
Personnel and Branches of Microfinance Sector 2004-07
Personnel Branches
2004 2005 2006 2007 2004 2005 2006 2007
MFBs 1376 1932 2996 3899 80 108 226 295
MFIs 507 859 1675 2374 62 81 173 259
RSPs 883 1335 2489 3214 203 339 652 600
Pakistan 2913 4526 7342 9529 362 549 1073 1165
Top 3 4474 5901 785 778
The increase in the investments has resulted in the increase in the total number of
assets available to retail microfinance provider shown in the graph 1. In 1999, the
total assets are $20 million which is an increase to $200 million in 2005.
35
Graph 1
Increase in total Assets
200
180
160
1999
140
2000
120
2001
100
2002
80
2003
60
2004
40 2005
20
0
1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 G
Graph 2
600000
500000
1999
Active Borrowers
400000 2000
2001
300000
2002
2003
200000
2004
100000 2005
0
1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005
5 Conclusions
Microfinance is the most important resource to provide loans and other basic financial
services to increase the employment rate, productivity and earning capacity. It will
impact the peoples‘ lives through removing poverty, improving living standards, such
as health, education, food and other social impacts.
The microfinance sector is developed day by day in Pakistan. Most of the population
of Pakistan is based on the rural area, where people live on the poverty line. The
need for microcredit is higher in the rural area than urban area. The target market of
the microfinance sector is estimated to be 25 to 30 million borrowers. The large
numbers of microfinance borrowers show the market opportunity and need in
Pakistan. In 2006 there were 600,000 borrowers of microfinance and the government
of Pakistan set the outreach goals to 3 million borrowers in 2010 and further to 10
million in 2015.
We found that high interest rates on microcredit are one of the problems faced by the
microfinance sector. The reason behind high interest rates is the cost of microcredit
transactions. But poor people still favor and want microcredit because they don‘t
have access to the commercial loans, which are collateralized loans. These poor
people are very hard working and may have innovative ideas about business but they
don‘t have opportunity. That is why they take micro loans on high interest rate and
often they get success in their business and repayment of these loans.
As we discussed earlier there is huge market for microfinance and large numbers of
people and businesses require micro loans. We found the impressive role of the
government in Pakistan in the microfinance industry. The government of Pakistan
realizes the importance and effectiveness of microfinance and takes the initiative to
support the microfinance industry. Microfinance ordinance 2001 is the key step of
government to the establishment of microfinance institutions for providing
organizational, financial and infrastructural support to poor people. The creation and
funded to the Khushhali Bank, which is the first microfinance bank in Pakistan also
contribute the great role in the microfinance industry.
38
We observed that there are three main types of microfinance provider in Pakistan;
Microfinance banks, Microfinance institutions, and Rural Support Programs. They all
have further various organizations. In the past few years these organizations are very
developed and provide the financial services to the people and business. We also
investigated the role of the Pakistan microfinance network in microfinance sector.
Their main objective is improvement of the coverage and sustainability in Pakistan.
We analyzed the Pakistan poverty alleviation fund (PPAF) in helping remove poverty.
The Pakistan poverty alleviation fund microcredit has decreased the poverty level of
borrowers from 6.61 % to 3.07 %, during this time period the borrowers have reached
higher income groups and non-borrower group reduce from 3.54 % to 3.07 %. This
difference between borrower and non-borrower results shows the importance of
microcredit. We also found that in this time period extremely poor borrowers have
increased by 0.63 %poverty, and they have no effect of PPAF microcredit in
removing poverty. The net impact present the positive impact of PPAF microcredit in
removing poverty by 2.23 %.so overall impact of PPAF on the households borrowers
has been positive. This positive impact shows that PPAF micro credit extends its
outreach to all over the country to removing poverty.
These facts and figures clearly show the improvement in the performance of
microfinance sector in Pakistan. But Pakistan still needs higher improvement in the
microfinance sector to reach their goals of outreach microfinance to 10 million
borrowers in 2015 and removing poverty.
39
We can also improve the microfinance sector by hiring highly educated and skillful
employees. The industry needs professionals and skilled staff which have deeply
knowledge about micro loans, and make new and creative programs in that sector.
There must be providing training to current employees such as sales employ can be
trained into credit assessment officers.
The commercial bank in the country should also providing the small loans to poor and
small entrepreneurs to enhance the outreach of loans and more people will take
opportunity. In Pakistan there is need of such type of policy which encourages the
commercial banks to enter the microfinance sector.
The Government should take strict action against those who don‘t pay back the
loans. Because there is default culture in Pakistan, people get the loans and not
willing to pay back. So the Government makes strict laws to dealing with defaulters
and make sure that this law is applicable to all whether it is poor or powerful
politician.
40
The interest on microcredit is very high compare to the other loans. Still people willing
to get the micro loans but if the interest is charge on these loans will reduced little its
help the poor a lot in payback the money. There should also revise the minimum and
maximum amount of loans in microcredit according to the need of peoples. Because
some time small business need little more loan to arrange the resources for business
and the interest rate will be also control by providing more. The interest is high
because the transaction cost on the little amount and once the loan amount is
increased the interest rate would also decrease.
It is suggested that in the future, the researcher must study the performance of
microfinance providers separately in order to analyze the individual performance and
contribution. The reason for this is that there might be some microfinance institutions
which are going in lose and some profitable. They can apply the policies and
procedure of successful institutions to other institutions which are losing.
Our second suggestion is to study the difficulties that face the borrower to get the
loans and repayment of these loans. This area deserves future research to identify
the problem and their solution to help the poor people.
Our third suggestion for future research is that researcher gets the primary data for
performance evaluation of microfinance in Pakistan. The statistics of their own
calculation may be present the different picture about the performance of
microfinance sector in Pakistan.
41
7 references
Lists of references
Asia/Pacific Region Report on the Microcredit Summit Meeting of Councils (2004)
Ahmed, S. (2002) Poverty and Micro-credit: New Realities and Strategies Issues,
Palli Karma-Sahayad Foundation (PKSF), Bangladesh.
Ahmed, U. F. (2000) Micro-credit Financing and Poverty Reduction, Monthly
Management Accountant, November-December 2000, Institute of Cost and
Management Accountants of Pakistan.
Ahmad; Alia. (2004), ―Civil Society; Social Capital and NGOs in Poverty reduction‖,
Paper presented in SIDA Workshop, January 2004
th
Bajwa, R. (2001) Talk given to the Participants of 75 National Management Course,
held at Pakistan Administration Staff College, Lahore, Pakistan.
Beck, T., Demirgüç-Kunt, A., and Levine, R. (2004) ‗Finance, inequality and poverty:
cross-country evidence‘ World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 3338, June.‘
CGAP (2002b) ‗Microcredit interest rates‘, CGAP Occasional Paper No.1, Revised
November.
Christen, R. P., Rosenberg, R., and Jayadeva, V. (2004) Financial institutions with a
double bottom line: implications for the future of microfinance. CGAP Occasional
Paper, July, pp. 2 3.
Dharmaranjan; S. (1998), NGO Development Initiative and Public Policy, New Delhi,
Kaniska Publishers.
Economic Survey, (2002-03) Economic Survey of Pakistan (2002-03), Govt. of
Pakistan, Finance Division, Economic Advisor‘s Wing, Islamabad, Pakistan.
Harper, M. (2003), ―Microfinance – Evolution, Achievements and Challenges‖, ITDG
Publishing, UK,
p.11
Haroon, Jamal. (2008) EXPLORING THE IMPACT OF MICROFINANCE IN
PAKISTAN
Kieran, Donaghue (2004), Microfinance in the Asia Pacific. Asian-Pacific
Economic Literature, Volume 18, Issuse 1, pp. 41-61.
42
NASIM SHAH SHIRAZI and AMAN ULLAH KHAN Pakistan Economic and Social
Review Volume 47, No. 2 (Winter 2009), pp. 215-228
Pakistan-―Some Basic Facts‖, Some Basic country facts, Retrieved on May 9, 2008
from http://www.pak.gov.pk/BasicFacts.aspx
Pakistan Micro Finance Net Work Reports (2004, 2005, 2006 and 2007)
Islamabad.
PMN, (2002), ―Country Paper on Pakistan Microfinance in the Private Sector‖,
Pakistan Microfinance Network, pp.2-5
PREM-World Bank, (2002), Empowerment and Poverty Reduction: A Sourcebook ,
Draft, PREM World Bank, p. VII, pp. 11-14
Report of Committee on Rural Finance, State Bank of Pakistan, 2002
Robinson Marguerite S. (2001): The Microfinance Revolution, Sustainable Finance
forthe Poor, Lessons from Indonesia, The Emerging Industry; The International Bank
for Reconstruction and Development/The World Bank, Washington D. C.
Roy, Mark A. (March 2003), ―Microfinance as a Tool for Development‖, BSUS 6900
Rural Credit Survey 1973, Government of Pakistan Islamabad
Waheed, S. (2001) Analysis of Issues on Micro Credit – The Case of Two Villages in
Punjab, The Pakistan Development Review, 40: 4 Part II (Winter 2001), pp. 723-750.
Waheed ur Rehman ,2007,‗‘Micro Finance;‗‘Barriers to the microfinance outreach for
women in Pakistan‘‘, SLU, Department of Economics, Uppsala, ISSN 1401-4084,
ISRN SLU-EKON-EX-No 501—SE, pp.7-8.(Rehman, 2007)
Internet:
http://www.bwtp.org/arcm/pakistan/II_Organisations/Supporting_Organisations/PMN.
htm#Funding
http://www.bwtp.org/arcm/pakistan/I_Country_Profile/pakistan_country_profile.html#
Regulations and government initiatives
http://www.cgap.org/p/site/c/template.rc/1.26.1309
http://www.khushhalibank.com.pk/resource_center/ordinance.php
http://www.microfinancegateway.org/p/site/m/template.rc/1.26.9183/
http://www.lysanderspooner.org/Poverty.htm
http://www.grameen-info.org
http://www.worldbank.org.pk/WBSITE/EXTERNAL/COUNTRIES/SOUTHASIAEXT/P
AKISTANEXTN/0,,contentMDK:20170390~pagePK:1497618~piPK:217854~theSiteP
K:293052,00.html
http://www.nobleprize.org