Zomato
Zomato
Case Study
Model information
Features
◦ DCF
◦ Multiple based valuation
◦ WACC calculation
◦ Assumptions benchmarking
◦ PMO page
◦ Financial page
Tab Structure
Tab name here Tab description here
Model Details
Company
Analysis date 5-Apr-19
Convert local currencies to INR
Units mm
Analyst Name Chandraneel Polavarapu
Case 1.0
Circular Switch 0
Initial Investment (mm)
1200
% debt
25%
% equity
75%
Discretionary repayment of debt
0
Formatting
Input
Hard coded
Formulas
1 2 3
1 2 3
(Base case) (Bull case) (Bear case)
0 1
Case Study Hist. Hist. Hist. Proj. Proj.
INR mm FY0 FY1 FY2 FY3 FY4
Other Income 2 4 1 11 18
Depriciation & Amot (4) (20) (39) (51) (80)
EBIT (91) (324) (361) (212) (43)
Taxes 0 0 0 0 0
Earlier Taxes 0 0 0 0 0
Deferred Tax 33 39 0 0 0
26 31 37
(115) (140) (166)
261 408 580
0 50 190
0 0 0
0 0 0
90 196 327
5% 5% 5%
1% 1% 1%
15% 15% 15%
8% 8% 8%
5% 5% 6%
30% 30% 30%
73 34 (50)
(39) (84) (140)
0 0 0
34 (50) (190)
Case Study Hist. Hist. Hist. Proj.
INR mm FY0 FY1 FY2 FY3
Assets
Current Assets
Cash and Cash equi 5 7 7 377
Inventories 13 106 136 139
Receivables 3 14 40 44
Loans & Advances 223 117 105 147
Other Current Assets 1 4 5 9
Deferred Tax 34 73 73 73
Total Current Assets 279 321 366 790
Receivables days 12 13 23 16
Payable days 61
CCC 30
Balance Sheet
Net Debt
Borrowings (363) (1,010) (1,582)
Cash and Bank 5 7 7
Net Debt (358) (1,003) (1,575)
Deferred tax 34 73 73
Net assets (29) (212) (556)
7 7 7 7
204 274 323 371
70 101 122 145
198 234 284 337
14 21 25 30
73 34 0 0
566 670 762 889
4.9% 4.9% 4.9% 4.9% >>> Since FY1 was the year of rapid expansion and FY2 was
16 16 16 16
61 61 61 61
30 30 30 30
Revenue Mix
Gross Margin % (ex- offers) >>> Forecasted gross margins are inclusive of offers
Economies of Scale 3% 3%
Offers % revenues
29% 19% 19% >>> Savories have been one of the first products to be laun
19% 19% 19% >>> The decline can be partly due to the introduciton of 'Pu
19% 19% 19%
65% 19% 19% >>> While sweets being one of the first products have seen
38% 19% 19% >>> Considering both the low base and the since it's just th
88% 52% 15% >>> Since these are MT focused their expansion would be l
33% 19% 19% >>> Assumed a constant decline in growth and attain stabil
19% 19% 19% >>> Assumed to grow at the industry average
58% 36% 15%
38% 19% 19%
38% 19% 19%
51 71 85
26 32 40
13 15 18
>>> Assuming the economies of scale to kick in from FY4 which might lea
3% 2% 2%
41% 43% 45% >>> Economies of scale to kick-in from 3 year of launch / operation of the
44% 46% 48%
44% 43% 43%
53% 55% 57%
21% 23% 25%
39% 41% 43%
19% 21% 23%
3% 3% 3% >>> Took the median to eliminate the outliers
56% 58% 60%
39% 41% 43%
18% 17% 17%
0% 0% 0%
2% 2% 2% >>> Due to introduction of pure spices cateogry I have assumed that this
5% 5% 5% >>> Assumed to linearly decrease the offers to 10%
0% 0% 0%
1% 1% 1% >>> Assumed the current discounts to continue
0% 0% 0%
0% 0% 0%
0% 0% 0%
0% 0% 0%
0% 0% 0%
2% 2% 2% >>> Assumed to linearly decrease the offers to 2%
he first products to be launched by the company and you can see that the growth as a % has decreased from 102% to 58%, so w
ue to the introduciton of 'Pure Spices' cateogry in FY2 which might have been cannibalizing sales taking portions of this cateogry
the first products have seen a rapid growth in all the years of operation. So we assume that they continue to grow and attain a s
ase and the since it's just the 3rd year of the product we can assume the beverages to grow at 4 times the steady state growth a
their expansion would be less in comparison to the other cateogries
e in growth and attain stability in FY6, also due to lower base assumed to attain stability in FY6
ustry average
n from FY4 which might lead to a 1% increase in gross margin every year
tinue to grow and attain a steady state by FY6 a year after the savories attain steady state
es the steady state growth and gradually decrease to the steady state in FY6
tinue to grow as the industry
Case Study Hist. Hist. Hist. Proj.
INR mm FY0 FY1 FY2 FY3
Circ 1
EBIT (212)
Interest payment 140
EBT (352)
Tax 0
9% 9% 9% 9%
7 7 7 7
104 0 82 244
7 7 7 7
NOPAT (212)
Depreciation 51
Deferred Taxes 0.0
Change in OWC (188)
Change in CWIP 0.0
Capex (51)
FCF (400)
Terminal Values
WACC 10%
LTGR 4%
Terminal value using long term growth rate
Discounting Model
Year 0 1
Discount factor 0.91
PV of FCF (362)
Sum of PV of FCF (54)
Sum of PV of FCF (54)
PV of terminal value 3,226
Enterprise value 3,172
Cash 7
Debt 1,582
Net Debt 1,575
Implied Equity Value 1,597
Liquidity Discount 25.0% >>> Since the company is a private company we need to fac
MOIC 1.8 x
5,284
2 3 4 5
0.82 0.74 0.67 0.61
(106) 78 139 198
ate company we need to factor the liquidity discount
rm growth rate
4.5% 5.0%
rm growth rate
4.5% 5.0%
Case Study
INR mm
Company Sales
Share price Market Cap EV 2,018
DFM Foods 224.50 11,270.00 12,180.00 4,253.10
Prataap Snacks 910.00 21,340.00 19,270.00 10,370.00
Agro Tech foods 583.00 14,210.00 13,920.00 8,120.00
ADF Foods 244.55 4,896.60 4,594.30 2,088.10
KRBL 333.80 78,573.00 90,327.50 32,470.00
Other FMCG Peers
Britannia 2,972.00 714,110.00 714,250.00 99,140.00
Nestle 10,850.00 1,046,214.90 1,030,465.70 112,920.00
GSCL 7,032.00 295,805.90 259,953.90 43,170.00
Average 4.2 x
Median 2.8 x
EBITDA EBITDA
2,018 BV Margin Receivable days Inventory Days Payable Days CCC
510.60 21.65 12% 0.00 20.81 35.46 -14.65
870.00 229.51 8% 7.19 32.41 41.77 -2.17
660.00 143.69 8% 22.46 51.45 34.17 39.74
295.50 79.78 14% 75.08 49.50 28.14 96.44
7,740.00 21.65 24% 27.44 330.59 14.71 343.32
23.9 x
22.1 x
21.1 x
15.5 x
11.7 x
47.6 x
39.4 x
29.4 x
Case Study
INR mm
Comparables % Debt % Equity Beta L
Median
CAPM
Cost of Debt 9%
After tax cost of debt 6%
WACC 10%
0.80
Multiple Based
Adj-IRR 47%
Proj. Proj. Proj. Proj.
FY4 FY5 FY6 FY7
Investment Structure
Debt 25%
Equity 75%
Year Count 0 1 2
Entry
Target Revenue 641 1,034 1,629
Exit Multiple 3.2 x 3.2 x 3.2 x
FV 2,035 3,310 5,214
(-) Net Debt (1,575) (1,215) (1,481)
Exit Multiple
Implied FV 4,168 2.7 x 3.0 x
25.0%
27.5%
30.0%
32.5%
35.0%
Exit Multiple
7 2.7 x 3.0 x
25.0%
27.5%
30.0%
32.5%
35.0%
Proj. Proj. Proj.
FY5 FY6 FY7
3 4 5
Exit Multiple
3.2 x 3.5 x 3.7 x
Exit Multiple
3.2 x 3.5 x 3.7 x
Case Study
INR mm
Mean
Median
Growth Stage
Mean
Late Stage
Mean
Stake Stage Equity Val (INR mm) Rev Multiple EBITDA Multiple
28.4% Late 564.4 1.3 x 12.5 x
34.0% Late 882.4 2.4 x 16.0 x
8.8% Pre-IPO 8,079.9 2.7 x 17.7 x
12.5% Late 7,200.0 1.8 x 16.1 x
27.6% Late 723.8 1.9 x 13.3 x
24.9% PIPE 2,590.0 1.0 x 10.8 x
17.1% PIPE 4,124.6 0.7 x 5.3 x
26.5% Late 1,700.0 2.0 x 11.8 x
10.8% Late 600.0 2.1 x 14.3 x
19.5% Late 3,500.0 3.4 x 18.1 x
22.4% Late 2,139.0 0.6 x 7.5 x
40.8% Late 1,102.6 1.5 x 17.5 x
15.0% PIPE 1,236.7 1.5 x 7.5 x
24.6% Growth 1,860.0 3.7 x 15.6 x
35.0% Late 971.7 0.9 x 11.4 x
33.0% Growth 402.6 2.7 x 23.5 x
9.9% PIPE 752.3 2.0 x 6.7 x
1.9 x 13.3 x
1.9 x 13.3 x
3.2 x 19.6 x
1.8 x 13.9 x
% Revenue GM % (ex-offers)
FY12 FY13 FY14YTD FY12 FY13
Savories 81.5% 37.6% 37.9% 36.2% 31.8%
Spices & Masalas 0.0% 27.1% 12.1% 0.0% 37.3%
Instant mixes 0.0% 23.5% 16.7% 0.0% 42.9%
Sweets 16.5% 7.5% 14.5% 45.3% 40.1%
Beverages 0.0% 1.8% 7.1% 0.0% 17.8%
RTE 0.0% 1.0% 1.9% 0.0% 35.3%
Pickles 0.0% 0.9% 1.0% 0.0% 16.2%
Others 2.0% 0.3% 0.5% 11.6% 3.2%
Frozen 0.0% 0.2% 2.5% 0.0% 50.9%
Pure Spices 0.0% 0.0% 2.7% 0.0% 0.0%
Vermicelli 0.0% 0.0% 3.0% 0.0% 0.0%
P AT -38 TOTAL
FY2
84
2
20
6
4
10
126
35
50
7
34
126
Case S Hist. Hist. Hist. Proj. Proj. Proj.
INR mm FY0 FY1 FY2 FY3 FY4 FY5
Snacks
GT 23,772 79,342
MT 160 735
Beverages
GT 9,620 32,144
MT 302 775
Spices
GT 13,404 38,953
MT 147 751
Instant Mix
GT 9,710 39,083
MT 160 840
Ready To Eat
MT 239 793
Frozen Foods
MT 80 669
Proj. Proj.
FY6 FY7