Co-Operative Staff-Student Research in Public Speaking in Higher Education
Co-Operative Staff-Student Research in Public Speaking in Higher Education
Recommended Citation
Cunningham, Christopher "Co-operative Staff-Student Research in Public Speaking in Higher Education," Teaching and Learning
Together in Higher Education: Iss. 21 (2017), http://repository.brynmawr.edu/tlthe/vol1/iss21/6
Cunningham: Co-operative Staff-Student Research in Public Speaking in Higher Education
A Problem Identified
So I decided to approach the lecturer of that course to discuss my observations related to student
anxiety with public speaking and ask for advice on how I could assist other students.
Approaching the door to the lecturer’s office was a confronting experience for me. As a second-
year student approaching a clinical psychologist, I knew how large a workload academic staff
have and how many students ask them for their advice and supervision every day. After the
initial ‘hellos’ there was an awkward silence. I explained that many students seemed to fear
public speaking (which, ironically, was a feeling I could empathize with at that exact moment). I
managed to articulate the situation, my position as a peer leader, the amount of students that I see
weekly, and what their issues were. Then the lecturer asked, ‘What’s your plan of action for the
issue that you have recognized?’ I believed that utilizing the friendly, open, and non-judgmental
peer learning environment to support other students in this area would allow for only a minimal
level of apprehension as a starting point to assist them.
The lecturer, to my surprise, agreed completely that the anxiety that students display when
publicly speaking was a real issue. She also expressed that there was minimal time, resources,
and opportunities for students to practice public speaking or to learn about reducing their anxiety.
1
1
Teaching and Learning Together in Higher Education, 21 [2017]
She indicated that the issue was increasing. The lecturer then asked me what I believed that ‘we’
could do about this matter. I explained that the research suggested that graded exposure
techniques and skills building would potentially assist the students to reach a comfortable level
with their ability to speak in front of others (Bodie, 2010; Duff, Levine, Beatty, Woolbright, &
Sun Park, 2007). However, I expressed my uncertainty with my ability to administer such
techniques. Suddenly there was a ‘ding’ from the computer and the lecturer explained that she
has another meeting and she would be happy to ‘supervise this project’ as she believed that this
course of action would be beneficial to students.
Leaving the room I was shocked as I had no idea that I was asking for a supervisor and that I
would have a clinical psychologist that would be happy to assist me in working on and
developing a peer-led, scaffolded skills building program to assist students. I was under the
impression that my lecturers were always busy and did not have time. Nor did I know that this
one brave but simple conversation would be the beginning of a long research and mentoring
student-staff relationship.
Going back to my peer leader supervisor there was a huge grin on my face because I was
thinking this was an incredible opportunity to create student-staff collaboration that could assist
students experiencing anxiety related to public speaking. A week later the lecturer, my peer
leader supervisor, and I caught up for a subsequent session to map out how we would progress.
This time, the lecturer had resources printed out and explained that she created a framework
surrounding a graded exposure methodology and used a well-known theory to build a scaffold
approach to identify and address the problem. She also suggested that we should submit an
Independent Study Contract (I.S.C.) so that I could have my work recognized and count towards
my degree. This was unexpected and a privilege especially as I had no idea what an I.S.C. was.
She explained it as a unit in which students can enroll with a supervisor that allows you to do
other work surrounding your degree that is not an already scheduled unit. Both my supervisors in
psychology and peer learning were adamant that I should do the I.S.C. For me, it was an
opportunity to work with two people that I admired.
The partnership formed between me and my two supervisors centered on the combined vision of
assisting students that were struggling with issues to do with public speaking. Working with this
in mind we were able to work as partners to strive for the greater good. The core values
surrounding this project were that it was student led, allowing me to make my own decisions on
where to go next and the supervisors were in a mentorship role.
Tentative Conclusions
At the time, I could not have foreseen what the partnership would amount to but two years later I
can report numerous outcomes:
• three presentations at national conferences
• two journal articles
• a national review of support available
• a focused attention program for peer leaders to use with their peers
• a continual development program surrounding mindful academic coaching
2
http://repository.brynmawr.edu/tlthe/vol1/iss21/6 2
Cunningham: Co-operative Staff-Student Research in Public Speaking in Higher Education
I now have more experience in research than most of my peers. This is due to my decision to
start a discussion about my observations and a desire to want to assist other students. It would
not have happened without the willingness of two academics to work with a second-year
undergraduate student who had an idea to use peer-learning methodology to assist other students
with public speaking. I cannot thank my supervisors enough for their support and encouragement
of our research project. I have grown both professionally and personally from this experience.
Without this experience, I would not have believed it possible that a student could make a change
to so many other students particularly in an area traditionally perceived to be postgraduate
research. The experience of identifying the problem of student anxiety related to public speaking,
working with colleagues to address this, and providing student support has allowed me to build
and apply a set of skills over the past two years. I believe this will allow for a smooth transition
from undergraduate to post graduate studies.
The importance of being able to speak with confidence and conviction should not be
underestimated. The impact of our work to support students, and enable clear and confident
communication at our university is clear: the program is being rolled out across our peer learning
programs with great success. I am glad I took those first steps and approached my psychology
lecturer. I hope by sharing this reflection I can encourage other students to take initiative in
building their own skill sets.
References
Blume, B. D., Baldwin, T. T., & Ryan, K. C. (2013). Communication apprehension: A barrier to
Students’ leadership, adaptability, and multicultural appreciation. Academy of Management
Learning & Education, 12, 2, 158-172.
Bodie, G. D. (2010). A racing heart, rattling knees, and ruminative thoughts: Defining,
explaining, and treating public speaking anxiety. Communication Education, 59,1, 70-105.
Duff, D. C., Levine, T. R., Beatty, M. J., Woolbright, J., & Sun Park, H. (2007). Testing public
anxiety treatments against a credible placebo control. Communication Education, 56,1,72-88.
3
3