Improving Radar Performance by Optimizing Overall Signal-to-Noise Ratio
Improving Radar Performance by Optimizing Overall Signal-to-Noise Ratio
Improving Radar Performance by Optimizing Overall Signal-to-Noise Ratio
Application Note
Radar Measurement Series
Overview Problem
In radar system design, optimizing the overall signal-to-noise ratio Radars need to extract very small signals—those coming from
(SNR) of the system will improve the overall performance of the targets of interest—in an environment that may include artifacts
system. This is typically done in one of two ways: by increasing such as clutter, jamming signals and spurious noise (e.g., signals
the signal or by reducing noise. Because a radar is a transmit/ from other radars). Any internally generated noise in the radar
receive system, improved SNR can be achieved by increasing the receiver circuit reduces the ability of the radar to discern the
transmitted power by using bigger, more-powerful amplifiers, by targets of interest. Noise generated within a receiver component
using larger or higher gain antennas, or a combination of these is indistinguishable from any legitimate signal within the signal
changes. frequency band and will be amplified equally along with expected
signals in any subsequent gain stages.
SNR can also be increased by decreasing receiver-contributed noise,
which is usually determined by the quality of the low-noise amplifier Measuring noise properties is an essential step in the process of
(LNA) at the front end of the receiver. In general, it is easier and less minimizing the noise generated within a receiving system. The fol-
expensive to decrease receiver noise—and achieve a better noise lowing equation determines the minimum signal level required to
figure (NF)—than to increase transmitter power. overcome system noise at the maximum range of the radar:
This note explains the Y-factor method and describes when you
should consider using the cold-source method. As a starting point,
the procedures outlined here assume you know the frequency of
interest of your radar and understand the gain characteristics of the
receiver. This latter point is important because the choice of noise
source is dependent on the gain.
You will also need to determine how you will access the device
under test (DUT). In an ideal situation, the DUT would have imped-
ance-matched connectors on its input and output. Because this is
seldom the case, you will need to determine how to best connect
the test equipment. For example, it may be most convenient to con-
nect through an ATE test fixture. Please refer to the “Tips” section
below for additional considerations.
2
Making the measurement
This procedure assumes the N9069A NF application is installed
in a signal analyzer that supports your chosen noise source at the
appropriate frequency range. The initial setup has five steps:
1. Select the appropriate frequency range for the device being
tested.
2. Select an internal amplifier option for the frequency range.
3. Enter the ENR table for the SNS Series noise source into the
signal analyzer: [Meas Setup] key, then {ENR} softkey, {SNS
setup} softkey, {Noise Source} softkey, set to SNS (Auto)
{Auto Load ENR}.
4. Use a cable to connect the noise source to the signal analyzer;
the SNS Series sources use the 11730A cable. Verify that the
ENR data has been transferred to the signal analyzer
Figure 1. Measurement setup with analyzer, noise source and DUT.
5. Save the ENR table: [Save] key, then {Data}, {ENR Table},
{Meas} Table, {Save As} name [Enter]. 4. Input the appropriate values for your DUT into the setup menu
and run the measurement.
Next, calibrate the NF application and analyzer:
1. Connect the input to the noise source to the rear of the
analyzer via the 11730A cable. Connect the output of Selecting a noise source
the source to the input of the analyzer.
The quality of the noise source affects the accuracy and
2. Set the start frequency: [Freq Channel] key, {Start Freq repeatability of your measurements. The excess noise
softkey, [10] keys, {GHz} softkey (enter your choice of ratios (ENR) of Agilent noise sources are calibrated with
frequency). traceability to national standards institutes. Nominal ENR
3. Set the stop frequency: {Stop Freq} softkey, [3] keys, values of 6 dB and 15 dB are commonly available.
{GHz softkey (enter your choice of frequency). We recommend a 15 dB noise source for most cases in
4. Set the number of points: {Points} softkey, [30] keys, which NF is expected to be 15 dB or more. A 6 dB noise
{Enter} (enter the number of points). source is recommended in two cases:
5. Set the averaging function: [Meas Setup] key, {Average • When measuring a device with gain that is especially
Num} softkey, toggle to ON, [15] keys, {Enter} softkey. sensitive to changes in the source impedance.
6. Calibrate the N9069A: [Meas Setup] key, {Calibrate • When the DUT has a very low noise figure (e.g., it does
Now} softkey, [Enter]. not exceed 15 dB).
Agilent offers three families of noise sources. The N4000A
Make the NF measurement: Series smart noise sources (SNS) are the simplest to use
1. Select the NF application in the signal analyzer. This is for frequencies up to 26 GHz because they simplify mea-
typically completed on the front panel: [Mode] key, surement set up by automatically downloading calibration
then press {More} softkey until {Noise Figure} softkey data to the instrument. The 346 Series extends the fre-
is available. quency range to 50 GHz, and the 347 Series sources have
waveguide interfaces for higher frequencies.
2. Use the visual setup guide to get started: [Mode Setup]
key, {DUT Setup…} softkey, {Amplifier} softkey, or
select your DUT from the drop down menu with a
mouse.
3. Disconnect the noise source from the input of the analyzer
and connect it to the input of the DUT. Connect the output
of the DUT to the RF input of the analyzer (Figure 1). Using
fewer adapters will provide better measurement results.
3
Alternative solution : Cold-source measurements Tips: Avoiding common difficulties
The cold-source or direct-noise method uses a vector network ana- A number of factors can affect the results of an NF measurement.
lyzer and requires only a known input termination, which is usually Below are some of the more common issues along with techniques
50 Ω at room temperature. The cold-source method also requires that will help you minimize or avoid problems when using the
an independent measurement of DUT gain. The procedure requires Y-factor method. In most cases, these items can be managed;
a single noise-power measurement as well as a gain measurement however, if any are difficult to control—or if measurements must
(both completed by the network analyzer). The network analyzer be made across a frequency-conversion or low-gain device- the
will require a noise source for instrument calibration as well as an cold-source method may be a better choice.
ECal module to be used as an impedance tuner.
Prevent interfering signals
Any form of RF interference, whether radiated or conducted, will mani-
When high precision is required, the cold-source method can pro-
fest itself as noise power and affect measurement accuracy. Therefore
vide the most-accurate measurements. Additionally, it is better able
it is imperative to eliminate these sources of interference. Fluorescent
to compensate for the source-mismatch situations that may occur
lights, cellular telephones, wireless routers and local radio transmitters
when testing transmit/receive (T/R) modules that use microstrip
can all interfere with the accuracy of noise measurements. Additionally,
input and output lines, or when switching separates the instru-
nearby heavy equipment or poorly shielded equipment cables (signal or
ment from the module in an ATE system. Because a vector network
analyzer is used, measurements can be made across low-gain, power) can all affect measurements. Suggestion: Always consider the
operating frequency range(s) of the DUT and look for possible sources
multi-stage devices and mixers (these measurements are particularly
of in-band interference that will affect your measurements.
problematic using the Y-factor technique).
Avoid adapters
The variables involved are too complex to cover in this application Corrections must be applied, especially for adapters at the input of
brief. If your testing involves one or more of the situations described the DUT. Wherever possible, use a noise source equipped with a
here and it is critical to obtain an NF measurement with a high level connector that is compatible with the input of the DUT.
of accuracy (e.g., a few tenths of a dB), we recommend using the Minimize mismatch uncertainties
cold-source method with the Agilent PNA-X vector network analyzer, Any impedance mismatches will create reflections of noise power
which can make appropriate corrections for common error sources. in the measurement and calibration path. The most likely problem
Figure 2 shows example results from cold-source and Y-factor mea- areas are in connections to the DUT. In some cases, an isolator
surements of a DUT in an ATE environment. can be used to absorb reflected power—but be aware that isola-
tors work over a limited frequency range.
4.500
Use averaging
Amplifier: Noise source: 346C (14 dB ENR)
Gain = 15 dB
Input/output match = 10 dB
Y-factor with noise source connected to
DUT via switch matrix
This will increase measurement times but it reduces display jitter
NF = 3 dB
Gamma opt = 0.27 ∠ 0 o
4.000 Fmin = 2.7 dB
Rn = 12 – 33
PNA-X
NF measurements assume the entire system is operating in a linear and
0.2 dB
3.000
stable region. Ensure that both the DUT and instrument are being oper-
2.500 ated in the linear region.
Calibrate, then measure
2.000
0.5 2.5 4.5 6.5 8.5 10.5 12.5 14.5 16.5 18.5 20.5 22.5 24.5 26.5 The best measurements will be made immediately after calibration.
GHz
* Note: this example ignores drift contribution