Application of Universal Design For Learning Part 1. Universal Design For Learning and Case Study
Application of Universal Design For Learning Part 1. Universal Design For Learning and Case Study
Application of Universal Design For Learning Part 1. Universal Design For Learning and Case Study
Mariyam loves stories and has great interests in animated movies. She likes to create
animations and make simple stories to align with it. She does not like to write long sentences
or paragraphs. Instead she likes to draw a mind map or make some drawings. She is highly
engaged when lessons are told like a story and there are some elements of technology
involved. She completes her worksheet when it has pictures and she only need to write few
words on it. When she is given an opportunity to make a story or an animation she is very
creative and comes up with the best in the class. She does not like to present what she had
made in front of a classroom. However, she is happy to hand it over to the teacher or best
peer and when the teacher starts explaining, she always interferes with her ideas. She gets
disengaged when the lessons have too much content and writing.
These characteristics of the student specifically aligns with the intellectual disability
problems which affects the intelligence and problem solving. The major characteristics of ID
are difficulty in understanding new information, difficulties with communication and social
skills, slow cognitive processing time and difficulties comprehending abstract contents
(Australian Disability Clearinghouse on Education and Training (ADCET), n.d).
Universal Design for Learning (UDL) is a framework to facilitate teaching and learning
for everyone and is based on the insights of how humans learn. The UDL strategy includes
eliminating the barriers of learning through universally designed curriculum, instruction and
assessment (Lieberman, 2017). It involves the adjustment of classroom environment, lesson
activities, resources used, equipment used and feedback given. This can benefit learners with
different intellectual and behavioural disabilities (Johnson- Harris & Mundschenk, 2014). It is
a student centred approach that focuses on the fact that one does not fit all. There are three
underlying guidelines for UDL. These include providing multiple means of representation,
multiple means of expression and multiple means of engagement ( CAST, 2011; National
Centre on Universal Design for Learning, 2014; Johnson-Harris & Mundschenk, 2014). UDL
provides learning environments that scaffold and provide (a) multiple means to access
information and knowledge (the “what” of learning), (b) multiple ways to do strategic tasks
(the “how” of learning), and (c) multiple ways of staying engaged in learning (the “why” of
learning). It is developed on the belief that catering for learners with difficulties improves the
learning outcomes for all students (Coyne, Pisha, Dalton, Zeph & Smith, 2012).
The current lesson plan has made adjustments through out, to ensure that Mariyam
can learn contents along side with others in the classroom. The lesson starts with an activity
of sharing something from students’ experience during the holidays. This provides a fresh
start by giving students an opportunity to share their interests and focus on mental well being.
Mariyam can share her favourite thing from the holidays (she would probably bring a story
about an event). This can help students to engage and at the same time help them align with
the class and teacher. This can be aligned with the ‘Mind Matters ‘program objectives of
mental wellbeing though conversations to support students’ interests (Raaba, 2012). This not
only helps Mariyam but trigger the interests in other students as all get an opportunity to
share their experience.
Through out the lesson Mariyam is given special assistance and guidance in
completing the tasks (for example scaffolding the tasks by giving key things to look for,
breaking down the concepts connecting to real life scenarios of energy transformations and
setting up goals and time restraints) (Foreman & Arthur- Kelly, 2014). Multiple means of
expression could also be used to assist John’s behavioural issues (Johnson-Harris &
Mundschenk, 2014). Editing the video can also be a challenging task for other students and
can be given as an optional homework task and can be added to their student portfolio for
the lesson in the online platform (Stefanakis & Meirer, 2010). Differentiation can help
students, both struggling and advanced learners, to learn within their current proficiency and
emerge to the next level (Meng & Bell, 2015; MacDonald & Dana, 2016).
Regular constructive feedback is another important factor for engaging students in the
learning process. This can be used by students as check for future learning and studies have
showed that students respond positively to feedbacks given (Clarke & Pittaway, 2014; Lyons,
Ford & Slee, 2014). This is done through immediate feedbacks and formal written feedback
in the lesson. The student answers are discussed and the student lesson journal as well as
worksheets are checked and given feedbacks before the next lesson. Students are also open
to peer feedback on their activities as the worksheet/ lesson journal is corrected by the peers.
Multiple means of feedback can assist in better learning and engagement.
The lesson plan specifically relies on the three guidelines of UDL to enhance student
learning and engagement. The lesson focusses on the use of technology to a large extend,
however, students are given options to select their way of doing tasks (handwritten oy using
ipads). The use of video media as a source of information helps students create mental models
and improve comprehension, for both students with and without disabilities (Stefanakis &
Meirer, 2010). Videos which are modified to support students to identify the key points or
concepts or to find answers can enhance student involvement (Stefanakis & Meirer, 2010).
This is done through the animated video created with cues to the main points and to identify
and label the transformations. Even though, it is not a highly adaptive video resource this can
help students to link the concepts to their daily life.
Not just the lesson, the overall design of the teaching strategy is based on the
continuous and organised learning and assessment. Students are to keep a student portfolio
with a journal for each lesson and worksheets attached. They are given the option to do in
their own preferred way as a notebook with each day’s work or an E-portfolio. This remains
as a record of their work and the feedback they get. In addition, it helps them to go back and
revise or add more details as they learn. Continuous learning and regular constructive
feedback along with different ways of representation of content materials are fundamental
factors used in the lesson plan. These derives its roots from Universal Design for Learning.
Outcomes: PW3 Energy appears in different forms including movement (kinetic energy), heat and
potential energy, and causes change within systems. (ACSSU155)
Content statement/s: PW3a. identify objects that possess energy because of their motion (kinetic) or
because of other properties (potential)
General capabilities: literacy, numeracy, ICT capability, personal and social capability, critical and
creative thinking.
Assessment: formative assessments through questioning, discussions , worksheets and exit slips
Lesson overview:
It will focus on the transformation of energy happening within different contexts. Students will learn
about the different energy transformations that is happening around them
Activity 1: Recap quiz: Students fill up the blanks with words. They
(5 min) Power Point Slide with fill up blanks can do this in pairs or individually.
passage
Students are given this as hard
copies if they need and is also
available on the online platform
where they can fill in and save for
later.
Presentation The major points of the lesson are Students takes note on the types of energy.
(15 min) covered through the powerpoint Students are given a learning journal for
presentation. each lesson which they fill while the teacher
explains the concepts. The powerpoint has
Walk around the class from time to same questions from the online journal and
time to ensure students are writing the teacher pauses now and then for the
notes. Ask questions to students to think and answer them either
reinforcement. on books or online.
Answers are also displayed at the They can write down the answers or
end. keywords or draw a concept map.
In this lesson, students can just draw chart
for different energy transformations at the
end of the powerpoint presentation and
have multiple choice questions and filling
blanks questions in between.
Video Animation video on different energy Students are asked to develop a mind map
(10 min) transformations happening in a day of energy transformations while watching
of an athlete (created by the the video.
teacher)
Students can do this either by drawing a
flowchart (handwritten/ipads), write or type
The video is played in class and the a narration of the activities of the athlete
animated video is available in the and mark the energy transformations or just
online platform which they can write down the transformations that they
modify. can see or they can mark within the
animation with the transformations at
different stages.
Conclusion (10 Lesson summation/exit slips Students enter the lesson summary in their
min) books or online platform.
Peer correction of the worksheet/ lesson
journal and discussion on the conclusions of
the lesson
References
Clarke, M. & Pittaway, S. (2014). Marsh’s Becoming a Teacher (6th ed.). French’s Forest,
Australia: Pearson Australia.
Coyne, P., Pisha, B., Dalton, B., Zeph, L., & Smith, N. (2012). Literacy by Design. Remedial And
Special Education, 33(3), 162-172. doi: 10.1177/0741932510381651
Evmenova, A., & Behrmann, M. (2011). Research-Based Strategies for Teaching Content
to Students with Intellectual Disabilities: Adapted Videos. Education and
Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 46(3), 315-325
Foreman, P., & Arthur-Kelly, M. (2014). Inclusion in action (4th ed.). Melbourne, Victoria:
Cengage Australia. pp. 145- 156
Friend, M., & Bursuck, W. (2012). Including students with special needs (6th ed., pp. 155-
169, 354-365). Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Pearson Education.
Johnson-Harris, K. M. & Mundschenk, N. A. (2014). Working effectively with students with BD
in a general education classroom: The case for Universal Design for Learning. Issues
and Ideas, 87(4), 168-174. doi: 10.1080/00098655.2014.897927
Inclusive Teaching: Intellectual Disability - ADCET. (n.d). Retrieved from
https://www.adcet.edu.au/inclusive-teaching/specific-disabilities/intellectual-
disability/
Lauren J. Lieberman (2017) The Need for Universal Design for Learning, Journal of Physical
Education, Recreation & Dance, 88:3, 5-7, DOI: 10.1080/07303084.2016.1271257
Loreman, T., Deppeler, J. & Harvey, D. (2011). Inclusive education: Supporting diversity in the
classroom (2nd ed.). Crows Nest, Australia: Allen & Unwin. pp. 137-160
Lyons, G., Ford, M. & Slee, J. (2014). Classroom management (4th ed.). Melbourne, Australia:
Cengage Learning.
MacDonald, M., & Dana, Nancy Fichtman. (2016). The Role of Differentiation and
Standards-based Grading in the Science Learning of Struggling and Advanced
Learners in a Detracked High School Honors Biology Classroom, ProQuest
Dissertations and Theses.
Maeng, J., & Bell, R. (2015). Differentiating science instruction: Secondary science teachers'
practices. International Journal Of Science Education, 37(13), 2065-2090. doi:
10.1080/09500693.2015.1064553
National Centre on Universal Design for Learning. (2014). Three principles of UDL. Retrieved
from http://www.udlcenter.org/aboutudl/whatisudl/3principles
Post, K., & Rainville, E. (2011). Universal Design for Learning. OT Practice, 16(4), 12-
14,17.
Rabaa, C. (2010). Towards improving the social and emotional wellbeing of Indigenous
children: Mental Health education in a far North Queensland school. Aboriginal and
Islander Health Worker Journal, 34(2), 21-24. Retrieved from
http://web.a.ebscohost.com.ezproxy.uws.edu.au
Rao, K. & Torres, C. (2016). Supporting academic and affective learning processes for English
language learners with Universal Design for Learning. Tesol Quarterly, 0(0), 1-13. doi:
10.1002/tesq.342
Stefanakis, E., Meier, Deborah, & MyiLibrary. (2010). Differentiated Assessment : How
to Assess the Learning Potential of Every Student (Grades 6-12). (1st ed.) pp. 138-
160
Teaching for Inclusion. (2017). Student profile builder. Retrieved from
http://web1.modelfarms-h.schools.nsw.edu.au/learningtraits_pdf.php
UDL: The UDL Guidelines. Retrieved from http://udlguidelines.cast.org/
What Is Intellectual Disability?. (n.d). Retrieved from https://www.psychiatry.org/patients-
families/intellectual-disability/what-is-intellectual-disability