Scribd
Upload
51 views1 page

Part V and Vi Table Thesis

This document summarizes the results of a study that tested the differences and correlations between teachers and students perceptions of an activity-based technical drawing module. The study found no statistically significant differences between how teachers and students rated the module in terms of acceptability, comprehensibility, attractiveness, and self-involvement. The study also found some weak correlations between ratings of the module and measures of student performance, such as a moderate positive correlation between perceived attractiveness and speed and a moderate negative correlation between self-involvement and accuracy.

Uploaded by

edward_sheed28
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
51 views1 page

Part V and Vi Table Thesis

This document summarizes the results of a study that tested the differences and correlations between teachers and students perceptions of an activity-based technical drawing module. The study found no statistically significant differences between how teachers and students rated the module in terms of acceptability, comprehensibility, attractiveness, and self-involvement. The study also found some weak correlations between ratings of the module and measures of student performance, such as a moderate positive correlation between perceived attractiveness and speed and a moderate negative correlation between self-involvement and accuracy.

Uploaded by

edward_sheed28
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 1

Part V.

Perception of Two groups of Respondents on Supplemental Activity-Based

Technical Drawing.

Table 10. Test of Difference on the Perception of the Two Groups of Respondent on the
Activity-Based Technical Drawing .

95% Confidence
Sig.
Student Teacher Mean Interval of the
t df (2-
Difference Difference
tailed)

Mean sd Mean sd Lower Upper


Acceptability 3.78 0.18 3.85 0.25 -1.580 108 .117 -.06476 -.14603 .01651

Comprehensibility 3.82 0.17 3.85 0.24 - .944 108 .347 -.03762 -.11660 .04137

Attractiveness 3.85 0.14 3.89 0.19 -1.329 108 .187 -.04190 -.10442 .02061

SelfInvolvement 3.88 0.14 3.85 0.24 .978 74.729 .331 .03762 -.03904 .11427

Part VI. Correlation Between the Level of Assessment of Activity-Based Technical

Drawing Module and Respondents Level of Performance.

This part discusses the correlation of teachers and students perception on the

activity-based technical drawing module in terms of acceptability, comprehensibility,

attractiveness and self-involvement to students level of performance in terms of accuracy,

neatness, speed and labelling.

Table 11. Correlation Between the Assessment of Activity-Based Technical Drawing


Module of the Respondent Performance Task
Self-
Acceptability Comprehensibility Attractiveness
Involvement
Accuracy -.171 -.171 -.100 -.223
Neatness .059 -.019 .070 -.061
Speed .248 -.017 .124 .107
Labelling -.037 -.198 -.166 -.054
**. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).
*. Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed).

The test of correlation between the respondent assessment of Activity-Based

Technical Drawing Module and Performance Task is presented in Table 11.

You might also like