02 Intravenous Fluids
02 Intravenous Fluids
02 Intravenous Fluids
WASD
2
INTRAVENOUS FLUID
THERAPY IN ADULTS
Normal distribution of water in the body: a man of 70kg total body weight:
Daily fluid balance under normal conditions: a man of 70 kg total body weight:
Input Output
Source Volume (ml) Site of loss Volume (ml)
Water 1000 Urine 1000
Food 650 Skin (insensible) 500
Oxidation (insensible) 350 Lungs (insensible) 400
Faeces 100
Total 2000 Total 2000
Adapted from[5]. Daily (24 hour) fluid requirements of a healthy adult are 25–35ml/kg.
Further, normal fluid and electrolyte balance can also be significantly altered in
malnutrition, medical treatment (e.g., Diuretics, NSAIDs), and organ dysfunction
(e.g., Oedema in Heart Failure, Renal Failure, Liver Failure i.e. re-distribution)[5, 6].
The Colloid Osmotic Pressure, [Oncotic Pressure], (mmHg) for: Plasma is 25;
Gelofusin is 26–29; 5% Albumen is 20; and 0 for Crystalloids.
The pre- (rarely available) and post-fluid loss body weight is the most accurate
parameter for assessing total fluid deficit. There is no formula available for an
accurate estimation of total fluid deficit[12]. Hence, assessing hypovolaemia and IVF
requirement is a summation of:
a. History: fluid losses, e.g. diarrhoea and vomiting; co-morbidities; current
medications etc.;
b. Clinical examination: current status and trends in:
5. Re-assess and continuously monitor the clinical fluid status/response to therapy (at least daily):
a. History – fluid losses, co-morbidities, current medications etc.
b. Clinical examination – ABCDE (trends and context):
BP/PR: the most important parameters to guide the volume of fluid replacement required;
Body weight (base line and daily): the best measure for assessing and monitoring volume balance–
deficit/gain;
Fluid balance charts.
c. Laboratory investigations:
Laboratory values (UEs);
u[Na] may be helpful in patients with high volume GI losses:
Reduced u[Na] excretion (,30 mmol/L)5total body Na depletion
u[Na]: if,155persistent volume depletion and the need for more fluids
NB. u[Na] values may be misleading in the presence of renal impairment or diuretic therapy
Adapted from[1].
Abbreviations: NS5Normal Saline, HM5Hartmann’s Solution
Routine Maintenance*: the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence
(NICE) recommendation for starting routine maintenance fluids, by giving 25–35ml/
day of hypotonic crystaloids ([4% D/1/5 NS/27 mmol KCl]/L) under close monitoring
to provide 1mmol/kg of Na, Cl and K[1], has since been disapproved in a recent
North American publication[2]. Isotonic Fluids are recommended as the first choice,
because hypotonic (Na,130) IVF was the main ‘reported’ cause of hospital-acquired
hyponatraemia[2]. The ‘evidence-base’ for favouring isotonic fluids over hypotonic
fluids was from comparative prospective studies in a different population, children,
the majority of whom were surgical and critical care patients rather than acute
admission units or general wards[2]. Of the isotonic fluids ‘balanced’ crystalloids are
probably superior to normal saline[6, 8]. However, the disparity would confirm that
close clinical and biochemical monitoring is as important as the choice of intravenous
fluid type.
Give less volume, ~20ml/Kg/day, for elderly and those with renal and
heart failure[1].
4–5% D‡5is given to prevent excess catabolism and limit starvation ketosis, 50–100g
of glucose/day[1, 2]. It prevents hypoglyacaemia, but does not provide complete
nutritional support[1, 2]. Involve the dietician to address nutritional needs[1].
CONCLUSION
Prescribing IVF should be part of the core medical pre- and post-graduate training.
Hospitals need to appoint a senior medical staff members, doctors and nurses, as
intravenous fluid management champions, and arrange for periodical tutorials and
workshops on the subject. Monitor and Audit.
REFERENCES
[1] National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE 2013): Intravenous fluid therapy for
adults in hospital. (Clinical Guideline 174). www.nice.org.uk/CG174.
[2] Moritz, M.L. and Ayus, J.C. Maintenance Intravenous Fluids in Acutely Ill Patients. The New
England Journal of Medicine (2015), Vol. 373, pp. 1350–60. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMra1412877.
[3] Lobo, D.N., Dube, M.G. and Neal, K.R. Problems with solutions: drowning in the brine of an
inadequate knowledge base. Clinical Nutrition (2001), Vol. 20, No. 2, pp. 125–130.
[4] National Confidential Enquiry into Perioperative Deaths. Extremes of age: the 1999 report
of the National Confidential Enquiry into Perioperative Deaths (1999). www.Ncepod.org.uk/
pdf/1999 /99full.pdf.
[5] Frost, P. Intravenous fluid therapy in adult inpatients. British Medical Journal (2015), pp. 350.
doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.g7620
[6] Powell-Tuck, J., Gosling, P. and Lobo, D.N. (2011). British Consensus Guidelines on Intravenous
Fluid Therapy for Adult Surgical Patients. http://www.bapen.org.uk/pdfs/bapen_pubs/giftasup
.pdf (viewed in 05.2015).
[7] Steele, A., Gowrishankar, M. and Abrahamson, S. Postoperative hyponatremia despite
near-isotonic saline infusion: a phenomenon of desalination. Annals of Internal Medicine (1997),
Vol. 126, pp. 20–5.
[8] Severs, D., Hoorn, E.J. and Rookmaaker, M.B. A Critical Appraisal of Intravenous Fluids: from
the physiological basis to clinical evidence. Nephrol Dial Transplant (2014), Vol. 30, pp. 178–187.
doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfu005.
[9] Gosling, P., Rittoo, D. and Manji, M., Hydroxyethylstarch as a risk factor for acute renal failure
in severe sepsis. Lancet (2001), Vol. 358, p. 581.
[10] Roberts I. Colloids versus crystalloids for fluid resuscitation in critically ill patients. The Cochrane
Database of Systematic Reviews 2004. CD000567.
[11] Perel, P., Roberts, I. and Ker, K. Colloids versus crystalloids for fluid resuscitation in critically ill
patients. Cochrane Database Systematic Reviews (2013), p. 2. CD000567.
[12] Uptodate. Maintenance and replacement fluid therapy in adults (accessed 12.12.2015)
[13] Royal College of Physicians. National Early Warning Score (NEWS): standardising the assessment
of acute-illness severity in the NHS. RCP, 2012.
[14] National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE): Acutely ill patients in hospital:
recognition of and response to acute illness in adults in hospital.
[15] KDIGO Clinical Practice Guideline for AKI. KI Supplements (2012), Vol. 2, No. 1. http://www.
kidney- international.org
[16] McFarlane, C. and Lee, A. A comparison of Plasmalyte 148 and 0.9% saline for intra-operative
fluid replacement. Anaesthesia (1994), Vol. 49, pp. 779–781.
[17] Williams, E.L., Hildebrand, K.L., McCormick, S.A. and Bedel, M.J. The effect of intravenous
lactated Ringer’s solution versus 0.9% sodium chloride solution on serum osmolality in human
volunteers. Anesthesia & Analgesia (1999), Vol. 88, pp. 999–1003
[18] Hadimioglu, N., Saadawy, I. and Saglam, T. The effect of different crystalloid solutions on
acid-base balance and early kidney function after kidney transplantation. Anesthesia &
Analgesia (2008), Vol. 107, pp. 264–269.
[19] Chowdhury, A.H., Cox, E.F., Francis, S.T. and Lobo, D.N. A randomized, controlled, double-
blind crossover study on the effects of 2-L infusions of 0.9% saline and plasma-lyte (R) 148 on
renal blood flow velocity and renal cortical tissue perfusion in healthy volunteers. Annals of
Surgery (2012), Vol. 256, pp. 18–24.
[20] Wilcox, C.S. Regulation of renal blood flow by plasma chloride. The Journal of Clinical
Investigation (1983), Vol. 71, pp. 726–735.
[21] Potura, E., Lindner, G., Biesenbach, P., et al. An acetate-buffered balanced crystalloid versus
0.9% saline in patients with end-stage renal disease undergoing cadaveric renal transplantation:
a prospective randomized controlled trial. Anesthesia & Analgesia (2015), Vol. 120, No. 1, pp.
123–9. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000000419.
[22] Khajavi, M.R., Etezadi, F. and Moharari, R.S. Effects of normal saline vs lactated Ringer’s during
renal transplantation. Renal Failure (2008), Vol. 30, pp. 535–539.
[23] O’Malley, C.M.N., Frumento, R.J. and Hardy, M.A. A Randomized, Double-Blind Comparison of
Lactated Ringer’s Solution and 0.9% NaCl During Renal Transplantation. Anesthesia & Analgesia
(2005), Vol. 100, No. 5, pp. 1518–1524. doi: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000150939.28904.81
[24] Burdett, E., Dushianthan, A. and Guerrero E. Perioperative buffered versus non-buffered fluid
administration for surgery in adults. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (2012), p. 12.
CD004089.
[25] Young, P., Bailey, M. and Beasley, R. Effect of buffered crystalloid solution vs saline on acute
kidney injury among patients in the intensive care unit: the SPLIT randomized clinical trial.
The Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA), (2015), Vol. 314, No. 16, pp. 1701–10.
doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.12334.
[26] Lobo, D.N. and Awad, S. Should chloride-rich crystalloids remain the mainstay of fluid
resuscitation to prevent ‘Pre-Renal’ acute kidney injury? Kidney International (2014), Vol. 86,
No. 6, pp. 1096–1105. doi: 10.1038/ki.2014.105.