Understanding Corneal Topography
Understanding Corneal Topography
By Dianne Anderson
Becoming familiar with the basics of topography will allow you to choose the appropriate map
for any given patient situation as well as understand the data associated with these maps. This
article explains the different topography map types, how to classify corneal astigmatism and
corneal shapes associated with various pathologies and how to design contact lenses with the
information provided. Even though the image presentations may vary between topographers,
this information is universal.
Types of Topographers
Topographers can be small-cone or large-cone Placido disc systems or slit-scanning devices.
Placido disc systems project a series of concentric rings of light on the anterior corneal surface.
The corneal shape or curvature is directly measured in diopters of curvature along
thousands of points on the rings. Placido disc topography systems do not actually
measure elevation; rather, they derive anterior corneal elevation data by reconstructing
actual anterior curvature measurements via sophisticated algorithms. Small-cone Placido
disc topographers project more rings on the cornea and have a shorter working distance than
large-cone Placido disc topographers. These systems supply a great deal of measurement
points and require a steady hand to ensure accurate image acquisition. The Medmont E300
(Medmont), Scout and Keratron (EyeQuip) and Magellan Mapper (Nidek) are examples of
small-cone topography systems. Large-cone Placido disc systems use a longer working
distance and project fewer rings onto the cornea than small-cone topographers and are more
forgiving when measuring patients with very deep set eyes. Examples of large-cone
topographers are the ATLAS 995 and 9000 (Carl Zeiss Meditec) and ReSeeVit (Veatch
Ophthalmic Instruments). Slit-scanning or elevation devices directly measure the elevation
of both the anterior and posterior cornea via time domain or light-based analysis. These
devices process elevation data along several points on the anterior and posterior corneal
surfaces. This data is then converted into anterior and posterior curvature in diopters as well as
corneal thickness or pachymetry in microns. Examples of elevation devices are the Orbscan
(Bausch & Lomb), Pentacam (Oculus) and Visante OCT (Carl Zeiss Meditec).
Color Scale Settings
Corneal topography maps utilize advanced color scales to identify curvature data. Areas of
steeper curvature are displayed in warm colors such as red and orange, whereas areas of flatter
curvature are illustrated in cool colors such as green and blue. Topographers display color
maps in “absolute” and “normalized” scales. These color scales appear on the left margin of the
map with the flattest curvature at the bottom and the steepest curvature at the top. The
absolute or standard scale displays a fixed range of curvatures selected in the settings of the
topographer regardless of the map selected. The normalized scale displays the range of
curvature or power calculated from the specific map(s) you select. This provides an excellent
general view of the entire cornea, as the scale shows the flattest to steepest readings.
Tangential Map
This map clearly defines small or “instantaneous” curvature
changes. It calculates each measured point of data at a 90°
“tangent” to its surface. Tangential maps provide a more detailed
description of the corneal shape and provide a clearer view of
the size and shape of the cone in a keratoconus patient, for
instance. The ability to measure the size of the cone is very
helpful in determining the ideal lens design and optic zone size.
Additionally, tangential maps define the position of the treatment
or effect of corneal reshaping and refractive surgery.
Specifically note the red ring of paracentral steepening outside
the blue central area of flattening in this example of myopic
LASIK (Figure 2). Comparing the red ring’s position in relation to
the pupil or visual axis clearly defines the position of the effect.
Figure 2
Refractive Power Map
This map provides an interpretation of the quality of vision a patient may achieve from the
corneal surface throughout the pupillary zone. The more consistent or uniform the refractive
power within the margins of the pupil, the better able the anterior surface of the cornea is to
refract light properly. Practitioners do not commonly employ the refractive map, as it does not
provide information on curvature or size and shape of the corneal surface (for which the axial
and tangential maps are more effective). However, this map can be very effective when used to
interpret the quality of vision achievable from a patient’s corneal surface. For instance, when
comparing pre- vs. post-corneal reshaping results, the refractive map illustrates the extent that
corneal surface changes contribute to the patient’s quality of vision and the position of the effect
of treatment in relation to the pupil. Thus, the refractive power map can aid you in determining
how well the patient sees specifically due to the contribution of the corneal surface to visual
acuity. Additionally, following corneal reshaping or refractive surgery, it can show you how well
or how poorly the effect is positioned.
Elevation Map
The elevation map defines the height of the cornea in
reference to “best fit sphere,” or the radius of curvature that
best matches the average curvature of the map. Placido
disc topography systems do not actually measure
elevation; rather, they gather elevation data by
reconstructing actual curvature measurements via
sophisticated algorithms.2,3 Elevation maps measure
corneal height in microns and have a somewhat
counterintuitive interpretation. Elevation is defined as the
difference between the actual corneal surface and the best-
fit reference sphere as measured in microns.2
Figure 3
Corneal elevation above the reference sphere is measured in positive microns and
appears as red shading on the map. Conversely, blue shading indicates that the corneal
surface is below the reference sphere and is measured in negative microns (Figure 3).
But, the corneal curvature can actually be very steep in these blue areas.4,5 Classic examples
include the periphery of a cornea along the steep meridian in limbal-to-limbal astigmatism and
the inferior periphery of a cornea with oval KC. These maps are especially helpful in determining
the outcome of contact lens fitting by predicting areas of excessive bearing (red/positive
microns) or pooling (blue/negative microns).4,5 This information will guide you in designing the
ideal RGP lens—spherical, aspheric, toric, keratoconic or reverse geometry.
Slit scanning and OCT devices measure the elevation of the front and
back surfaces of the cornea. This is displayed as anterior and posterior
float maps. “Float” refers to the fact that the best fit sphere has no fixed
center, but rather floats. The distance between cornea and reference
body is optimized to be as small as possible and as equal as possible
(Figure 4).
Figure 4
Displays
The Single View display shows a single exam for a selected patient; recommended use is for
baseline screening.
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 11 Figure 12
Measurements
A. Apical Radius
The apical zone is the area around the corneal apex where the refractive power is MOST
constant. The apex does not always correspond to the geographic center or vertex of the
cornea.
Apical radius (Ro) is defined as the power of the cornea at the apex.
Because reverse geometry and scleral lenses—fits based on corneal vault rather than base
curve—have a specified chord length and sagittal value, this measurement is very helpful when
fitting either lens on post-surgical or irregular corneas. To effectively fit these difficult corneas,
match the sagittal height of the reverse geometry or scleral lens with the sagittal height of the
cornea, and add 15 microns, as doing so allows for a sufficient tear layer.
D. Pupil Size
Topographers automatically generate a pupil diameter measurement. However, not all
instruments offer both photopic (with light) and scotopic (without light) measurements.
Indices
A. Eccentricity
There are several mathematical interpretations of corneal shape. One of these, eccentricity,
measures the rate of corneal flattening from the apex to the periphery along a specific chord
and axis. Corneas that flatten at a greater rate from the center outward are assigned high e-
values, and those that flatten at a lesser rate have low e-values. Spherical corneas have low e-
values as compared to keratoconic corneas, which have a much steeper apex and flatten at a
greater rate toward the periphery. The e-value is also an indicator of corneal sagittal height.
Corneas with lower e-values are more spherical and have a greater sagittal height, while
corneas with higher e-values are more elliptical and have a lower sagittal height.9
B. Shape Factor
Shape factor is a measure of corneal asphericity and a derivative of eccentricity. It is identified
as e2 (e squared).2,10 Shape factor differs from eccentricity; it is possible to assign prolate
cornea positive values and oblate corneas low positive or negative values.2,10 In a normal
cornea, the steepest radius (hottest color) is near the center, while the flattest curvature (coolest
color) is toward the limbus. Patients with KC have highly prolate corneas with high shape factor
values.
C. I-S Index
The inferior/superior (I-S) index is a measure of the difference between the average inferior
power and average superior power on the cornea.11 The ratio difference between these two
measurements is the I-S value, expressed in diopters. A positive value is common and signifies
that the inferior cornea is steeper. This positive value will be higher in cases of corneal ectasia,
and an I-S value over 1.2 is characteristic of KC.11 Negative I-S values are less common
and indicate that the superior cornea is steeper than the inferior cornea.
Simulated Fluorescein Patterns
The simulated fluorescein (NaFl) pattern enables you to
visualize the effects of the base curve, diameter and edge
lift changes on the lens fit (Figure 13). Specifically, it
appears over a given topography map, allowing you to
evaluate the tear layer clearance beneath a specified RGP
on that cornea. As a result, when you use the simulated
NaFl pattern as a guide to achieving the optimal tear layer
Figure 13 clearance, you have an excellent chance of designing the
best RGP for any given cornea. Keep in mind, however, that the simulated NaFl pattern has
limitations, as it does not take into consideration the effects of lid tension, corneal tilt and the
tendency of a lens to gravitate toward the cornel apex (which may not be at the geometric
center of the cornea). Each of these factors can cause a lens to decenter away from the
geometric center of the cornea. The bottomline: The simulated fluorescein pattern allows you to
more accurately pick the initial trial lens, which you then evaluate on the eye. The trial lens then
enables you to consider the effects of lid tension, etc.
A. Toric
In order to minimize rotation and ensure stability, toric lenses must be fit with the optimal base
curve and diameter. As previously mentioned, corneal diameter and sagittal height are
determining factors in base curve selection. Larger corneas require steeper base curves than
smaller corneas. A toric lens with too flat a base curve will rotate and result in fluctuating acuity.
Steepening the base curve and/or increasing the diameter is the key to fitting success
with soft toric lenses that rotate excessively. Compensating for rotation by adjusting the axis
will not resolve the instability.
B. Multifocals
It is imperative that multifocal lenses be centered over the patient’s pupil for optimal acuity at
distance. Aspheric multifocal lenses have distance correction in the center and near correction
in the periphery. Patients with large pupils may experience haloes and glare with this type of
multifocal design as the peripheral near addition induces spherical aberration. Multifocals that
have a center near addition create simultaneous vision. Patient’s with large pupils will
experience less aberration from simultaneous vision lenses as the periphery is all distance
correction. A topography map prior to fitting multifocals is helpful in determining the patient’s
pupil size. A topography map over the multifocal lens will show you where the lens sits in
relation to the patient’s pupil. If the pupils are very small or the lens decenters, the patient will
not be capable of experiencing the multifocal properties and should be fit in monovision rather
than multifocal lenses.
C. Keratoconus
In keratoconus, the cone apex is decentered inferiorly and may not be measured accurately with
standard keratometry. Having a topography map helps you to streamline the fitting process on
these irregular corneas by providing you with curvature readings over the entire cornea. The
axial map provides an accurate curvature value of the cone, the tangential map provides a clear
picture of the location and size of the cone, and the elevation map indicates the height of the
cone. This information enables you to choose a base curve that will result in apical clearance
rather than bearing.
D. Reverse Geometry
These lenses have a flatter central base curve with a steeper mid-peripheral curve and are
designed for;
1. Orthokeratology
When fitting these designs, corneal topography enables you to monitor the centration and
dioptric effect of the treatment zone, regardless of the fitting method and lens design.
2. Post-Refractive Surgery
You can design reverse geometry lenses for post-RK and myopic LASIK patients empirically by
sending a copy of the topography map along with the spectacle prescription to your lab. The lab
assesses the color differences—an indication of curvature changes—to determine the base
curve, paracentral fitting curve and peripheral edge configuration. The topography map allows
you to determine the optimal fitting curve which is based on the corneal curvature beyond the
central 3mm measured by standard keratometry. These oblate corneas are steeper in the
periphery than centrally, so using the central keratometry reading will result in a lens that is
much too flat.
3. Advanced Keratoconus
In cases of advanced keratoconus where it is difficult to get an accurate topography map and
difficult to fit standard keratoconus lenses, specially designed reverse geometry lenses are
needed to cover the cone apex. These lenses are based on corneal height rather than curvature
and a diagnostic fitting set must be used to ensure acceptable results. If this is not achievable, a
corneal transplant is recommended.
There is no one “best” map with which to evaluate corneal topography. A thorough evaluation of
the cornea depends on your knowledge of all topographic displays—curvature, height and
power. When examined together, they provide a more comprehensive picture of the cornea,
which allows you to better and more accurately diagnose and care for your patients.
References
2. McKay T. A Clinical Guide to the Humphrey Corneal Topography System. Dublin, CA:
Humphrey; 1998.
5. Caroline P, Andre M. Elevating our Knowledge of the Corneal Surface. CL Spectrum 2001
Apr;16(4):56.
10. Medmont International Pty Ltd. Medmont E300 Corneal Topographer User Manual.
Australia: Medmont Intl; 2006 Mar:43.
RCCL
11. Feder R, Kshettry P. Noninflammatory Ectatic Disorders. In: Krachmer J, Mannis M,
Holland E, eds. Cornea 2nd ed; vol 1. Philadelphia: Elsevier Mosby; 2005:955-968.
“Understanding Corneal Topography”
To receive one hour of continuing education credit, you must be an AOA Associate member
and must answer nine of the twelve questions successfully. This exam is comprised of
multiple-choice questions designed to quiz your level of understanding of the material
covered in the continuing education article, “Understanding Corneal Topography”.
To receive continuing education credit, complete the information below and mail with your $10
processing fee, $10 per hour of CE before December 31st of this year to the:
AOA Paraoptometric Resource Center, 243 N. Lindbergh Blvd, St. Louis, MO 63141-7881
7. Apical radius is
a. A measurement of the most constant power of the cornea
b. Used to determine corneal depth when combined with HVID
c. A measurement of the corneal power along the visual axis
d. a & b