Central Vigilance Commission A-Block, GPO Complex, Satarkata Bhavan, INA, New Delhi, 110023

Central Vigilance Commission, A-Block, GPO Complex, 10/06/2019
Satarkata Bhavan, INA, New Delhi, 110023
Re:- seeking information for disclosure of corruption in India’s PSU

The apex decision makers of India’s non-life Public sector Insurance co.s {called GIPSA}
have approved scheme that the public Fund & public resources shall be utilized for
protection of the employees, e.g. directors and/ or their family members against whom
the law enforcement agencies of India have registered case(s) of corruption/ abuse/
crime . (Details as per the last page-last para}
Immediately thereafter an alleged financially corrupt,PSU insurance employee {salary

roll no. 26019, NIACL} has been promoted with increments from retrospective effect.
The applicant seeks the following information strictly from Central Vigilance
Commission {CVC} with request not to transfer this RTI to any other public authority :-
a. Duly certified copies including correct information of Date, reference number,

of the mandatory guidelines of the CVC in respect of promotions of doubtful
integrity officers in the public sector (PSU) institutions of India.
b. Duly certified copy including correct information of Date, reference number,
name and designation of the authority of CVC according approval for promotion
of a doubtful integrity officer of NIACL ,salary roll number 26019, Jaipur
ShriGopal Soni, (RTI applicant)
C231,Panchsheel Nagar, Ajmer-305004. 91-9414982395 [email protected]
e-mail Name of Address

Insurers/regulator apex
decision maker of India
1. [email protected] Mr. A V Girija Kumar ,CMD, House, A-25/27 , Asaf Ali
The Oriental Insurance Company Road,New Delhi - 110 002.
Ltd {OICL}
2. [email protected], Ms.Tajinder Mukherjee ; CMD, 3,
National Insurance Company Middleton Street
Limited {NICL} Kolkata -700 071.
3. [email protected] Mr. Atul Sahai ;CMD , The New 87,
India Assurance Company M.G Road, Fort,
Ltd; **{NIACL} Mumbai-400 001.
4. [email protected], Mr.Girish Radhakrishnan ; United 24, Whites Road,
India Insurance Co. Ltd {UIICL} Chennai - 600 014.
5. [email protected] Mrs. Alice G Vaidyan; General Suraksha, 170, Jamshedji Tata
Insurance Corporation Of India Road, Churchgate, Mumbai –
{GICRe} 400 020
6. [email protected] Mr. Rajeev Kumar Secretary; 3rd floor JeevanDeep Building,
Department of Financial Services; Sansad Marg,
{DFS}, Ministry of Finance, New Delhi-- 110001
7. [email protected] General Insurers Public Sector Ground Floor,
Association (GIPSA), 5, Jeevan Tara Building, Sansad
Marg, NEW DELHI-110001.
The events as watched by the applicant , a vigilant citizen of India with absolutely
no criminal antecedents :-
1 24/02/1988 Applicant is appointed as Hindi Translator in a PSU Insurance
1
company; the minimum qualification required is that of second
class graduate, a class-1 officer’s minimum qualification was
graduate in LIC/GIC
2 31.10.1991 directions that If a Hindi Translator seeks transfer as Asstt. he
OICL should be asked to forego additional increments..
3.## January 2003 An employee of NIACL (doubtful integrity salary roll

no.26019 **) demands bribe in consideration of claim cheque
payment from the insured near Jaipur (Rajasthan) the anti
corruption agency catches him red-handed, it is recorded that
his trouser’s pocket ,his hands became red { with gratification}.
4 29.09.2003 Applicant is discriminated in promotion while junior persons
,e.g. salary roll no.24449 promoted in the NIACL {New India
Assurance Co. Ltd}, where the slogan is “follow the leader”
5 7.12.2005 Kamlesh Vasisht, the then incharge of NIACL regional Office
Jaipur communicates to law enforcement authority her intent
to remove S R No.26019 ** she records dissent to explanation
of alleged employee, also records the “aparadh” of the
doubtful integrity officer that misconduct of bribe taking is
established.
6 30.07.2007 Competent court of law grants stay orders upon transfer orders
issued to Applicant dated 5/6/2007 . A Hindi Translator is
addressed as assistant for the sake of transfer. S. B.
Civil writ petition no. 4575/2007 for promotion of Applicant.
7 30.08.2007 NIACL RTI reply: A Non Matriculate employee cannot be
promoted to the post of Hindi Translator. {however, can be
promoted as an assistant }
8 24.09.2007 NIACL replies that the balance of leave in Applicant’s account
cannot be supplied as leave for 21/06/2007 to 31/7/2007 is
pending in Jaipur
8 26.3.2008 Sri Harichand,on behalf of NIACL is
{misogynist pleased to write:-“It is surprising fact
deposition that the wife of Mr. Soni is not

following the Hindu Family Traditions
against wife
as she is comfortable away from her
of Applicant}
sick husband..” {Salary No. 20676 is
soon to be rewarded as Dy Gen Manager}
9 April 2008 Suspension order issued by name of Applicant ,1975 rules;
altering his designation to assistant, no grave charge except so
called violation of discipline of leaving headquarter{February
2
2008}. 29/4/2008 CVC Office Memorandum : Apex
Anti corruption body’s cognizance on the complaint against
isolation forced against the Applicant, CVC directs NIACL to
ensure no harassment to the Applicant.
9-b 14/11/2008 LIC to Applicant:- Our disciplinary process*,being based upon
Principles of natural justice, the enquiry/investigation officer
without prior intimation to charge sheeted employee (CSE)
cannot include deposition of any fresh witness than that of pre-
declared. On 25/09/08 etc. above ethics ignored by NIACL
9-c 10/12 Central Information Commission records defence of NIACL
/2008 respondents F. No. CIC/ AT / A/2008 /00535 :- “Appellant’s

purpose is only to cause harassment and loss to the public
authority. He cannot be allowed to carry on his activities.”
10 February 09 Rules of discipline are altered from retrospective effect.
11/02/09 Bribe taking is reported at Jaipur NIACL, CBI entraps one B.K.
Gupta; however, no one put to suspension. RTI reply
addressed on behalf of NIACL:-“applicant has expressed his
opinion about state of corruption in its confirmation asked
information about third party, hence denied”. The ethics is
that even an exempted body, e.g. CBI cannot deny
information of corruption of employees
11 2008-09 In the garb of domestic enquiry, Investigation officer NIACL
directs “written brief” from one Harichand, it is deposed in the
said brief that Applicant left headquarters to get stay orders.
12 12.02.2009 LIC informs: there is no provision of such”brief” from a
witness. (during domestic enquiry)
13 8.06.2009 LIC informs : The disciplinary authority is required to submit
complete enquiry/investigation report before taking a decision
in the matter of charged employee. Applicant represents above
to NIACL; no reply.
14 14.05.2009 RTI to CVC reveals applicant-applicant that his complaint was
sent for necessary action to CVO, NIACL on 29/4/2008
15 27.06.2009 It (RTI writings of applicant) is a crude attempt to confuse the
different authorities & an attempt to escape from the due
process of law,observes one A R Sekar, GM, NIACL
16 30.09.2009 No provision of taking cognizance on the basis of joint
representation of insurance employees. LIC RTI reply. There
is no provision of delivery of communication to the delinquent
5.10.2009
employee at his home by the messenger. RTI reply of NICL
3
17 19.05.2010 Applicant’s RTI to apex court that egregious corruption has eroded
public confidence, forwarded by the Add. Registrar to NIACL
18 30.05.2011 Dept. of Official Language,Ministry of Home takes cognizance

of Applicant’s complaint 10.5.2011 about protection to corrupt
officials NIACL, forwards to DFS.
19 June 2011 NIACL chairman’s order sets aside the disciplinary penalties of
11/2009 ; yet ignores the principles of natural justice inter alia
the directions of CVC , ignores a chargesheet cannot be
communicated by messengers; ignores that Applicant cannot be
punished on the basis of such rules that were never ever alleged
20 10.08.2011 Applicant’s RTI 13/6/11 forwarded by the Prime Minister’s
Office {PMO} : Delhi NIACL negative reply : “Information
sought by the applicant is nearly 23 years old…”
21 15.09.2011 “Only when the competent authority is not available in the R.O.
matter is referred to HO.” DGM, RTI OICL informs
22 12.10.2011 Petitioner-applicant is otherwise employee of respondent
insurance company, Rajasthan High Court interim order in S.
B. (c) Writ Petition No. 14838/10
23-a 9.01.2012 {12- DFS letter to Chairman NIACL ignored on Applicant’s
2011 to 1-2012} complaint of denial in promotion :-“denial of fundamental

rights”... doubtful integrity employee 26019 participates .
23-b 1/10/2012## Doubtful integrity employee no.26019 gets favourable order of disclosure
of Information from Central Information Commission in respect of marks
obtained by 3 successful candidates in written examination for promotion.
Appeal No. CIC/SD/A/2012/000536
It is suppressed that he was trapped red-handed in the act of gratification
24
RBI Chief Vigilance Officer forwards applicant’s concerns , entitled:-
26.12.2014
GIPSA company’s tactics of Writ Petition to protect the corrupt abuse of…
25
6/01/2017 Case No. CIC/MP/2016/000371 Date of decision 30 Januray 2017
CIC record the NIACL Jaipur respondent’s oral submission:-{argument for
denial of information} …they further stated that the appellant was a
terminated employee of NIACL and had filed 100 RTI applications.
26 December
2018
NIACL eventually
promotes a fully A. R. Sekar, apex leader of NIACL
disciplined /GIPSA as on 20.7.2012 is actually seen in the company of a mainstream
employee,26019; employee of doubtful integrity S R No. 26019 at Jaipur Regional Office.
##turning blind eye November 19,2018 General Insurers Public Sector Association {GIPSA}an
to the moral and unregistered apex body frames scheme of immunity for decision makers
ethical standards of PSU non-life insurance Co.s euphemistically called : “legal and financial
support to serving/retired employees/officers ..against legal cases arising
out of bona fide execution of Company’s work”. The scheme benefits
the alleged psychopaths and their promoting managers who somehow get
rewarded in the workplace(s) of PSU Insurance.

Central Vigilance Commission A-Block, GPO Complex, Satarkata Bhavan, INA, New Delhi, 110023

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Central Vigilance Commission A-Block, GPO Complex, Satarkata Bhavan, INA, New Delhi, 110023

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Central Vigilance Commission A-Block, GPO Complex, Satarkata Bhavan, INA, New Delhi, 110023

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Central Vigilance Commission, A-Block, GPO Complex, 10/06/2019

Satarkata Bhavan, INA, New Delhi, 110023

Re:- seeking information for disclosure of corruption in India’s PSU

Immediately thereafter an alleged financially corrupt,PSU insurance employee {salary

a. Duly certified copies including correct information of Date, reference number,

e-mail Name of Address

OICL should be asked to forego additional increments..

3.## January 2003 An employee of NIACL (doubtful integrity salary roll

deposition that the wife of Mr. Soni is not

/2008 respondents F. No. CIC/ AT / A/2008 /00535 :- “Appellant’s

18 30.05.2011 Dept. of Official Language,Ministry of Home takes cognizance

2011 to 1-2012} complaint of denial in promotion :-“denial of fundamental

You might also like