Cube Difference Labeling of Theta Graphs
Cube Difference Labeling of Theta Graphs
ISSN No:-2456-2165
Abstract:- In this work, we prove that the theta graph Definition 2.5
(Tα), Duplication of any vertex of degree 3 in Tα, path A graph G is a graph obtained by switching the
union of r copies of Tα, one point union of r(Tα), the centreapexv0 of G, removing all the edges incident with v
fusion of any two vertices of Tα, switching of a central and adding edges joining v to every other vertex which
vertex in Tα are Cube difference labeling. are not adjacent to v in G [4].
II. DEFINITIONS Then the entire eight edges receiving the labels as,
f *(𝑣0 𝑣1) = [𝑓(𝑣0 )]3
Definition 2.1 𝑓 ∗ (𝑣0𝑣4 ) = |[𝑓(𝑣0 )]3 − [𝑓(𝑣4 )]3 |
A graph G = (V, E) is said to be cube difference 𝑓 ∗ (𝑣𝑖 𝑣𝑖+1 ) = 3𝑖 2 − 3𝑖 + 1, 1 ≤ 𝑖 ≤ 5
graph (CDG) [5] if there exist a bijection 𝑓 ∗ (𝑣1𝑣6) = [𝑓(𝑣6 )]3
g: V(G) → {0,1,2, … 𝑝 − 1} such that the induced function
g*: E(G) →N given by Thus, 𝑓 ∗ (𝑒𝑖 ) ≠ 𝑓 ∗ (𝑒𝑗 ), ∀𝑒𝑖 𝑒𝑗 ∈ 𝐸(𝐺) and all edge
g*(xy) = |[𝑔(𝑥)]3 − [𝑔(𝑦)]3 | is injective ∀𝑥, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐸(𝐺). labeling are definite.
Definition 2.2 Hence the graph Tα admits cube difference labeling.
A theta graph (Tα) is a block with two non-adjacent For instance, the graph T6 is given below.
vertices of degree 3 and all other vertices of degree 2.
Definition 2.3
A vertex 𝑣𝑘′ is said to be a duplication of 𝑣𝑘 if all the
vertices which are adjacent to 𝑣𝑘 are now adjacent to 𝑣𝑘′
[4].
Definition 2.4
A graph 𝐺1 is established by fusing two vertices x
and y (are definite vertices in G) by a single vertex w in
𝐺1 such that every edge which was incident with either x
or y are now incident with w in 𝐺1 [4].
D. Theorem 3.4.
The one point union of r copies of theta graph
admits CDL.
Proof
Fig 2:- Duplication of v4 in T6 Admits CDL Consider G = (V, E) be the one point union of r(Tα).
(𝑗)
Now define V(G) = {𝑢𝑖 , 𝑤/0 ≤ 𝑖 ≤ 5,1 ≤ 𝑗 ≤ 𝑟} and
C. Theorem 3.3
The path union of r copies of theta graph Tα is cube E(G) = {𝑢𝑖(𝑗) 𝑢𝑖+1
(𝑗)
} ∪ {𝑤𝑢𝑖(𝑗) } ∪ {𝑤𝑢5(𝑗) } ∪
difference graph. (𝑗) (𝑗) (𝑗)
{𝑢0 𝑢3 } ∪ {𝑢0 𝑤}
Proof: Clearly, |𝑉(𝐺)|= 6r+1 and |𝐸(𝐺)|= 8r
Let G be the path union of r(Tα) with the vertex set Define a bijective function 𝑓: 𝑉 → {0,1, … 6𝑟} as follows:
(𝑗)
(𝑗)
V = 𝑢𝑖 , 0≤ 𝑖 ≤ 5, 1≤ 𝑗 ≤ 𝑟 and the edge set E(G) = 𝑓(𝑢0 ) = 6j-1
(𝑗)
E1∪ 𝐸2 ∪ 𝐸3, where 𝑓(𝑢𝑖 ) = i+6j-7 for 1 ≤ 𝑖 ≤ 5, 1 ≤ 𝑗 ≤ 𝑟
(𝑗) (𝑗)
E1 = {𝑢𝑖 𝑢𝑖+1 /1 ≤ 𝑖 ≤ 5} f(w) = 6r
(𝑗) (𝑗) (𝑗) (𝑗)
E2 = {𝑢0 𝑢1 , 𝑢0 𝑢4 /1 ≤ 𝑗 ≤ 𝑟} The edge set E is classified as same as mentioned in
E3 = {𝑢3(𝑗) 𝑢2(𝑗+1) /1
≤ 𝑗 ≤ 𝑟 − 1} the theorem 3.3. Thus 𝑓 ∗ (𝑒𝑖 ) ≠ 𝑓 ∗ (𝑒𝑗 ), ∀𝑒𝑖 𝑒𝑗 ∈ 𝐸(𝐺).
Hence the theorem is verified. For instance, the example
Note that the cardinality of vertices and edges are7r of 4(Tα) given below.
and9r-1resp.,
E. Theorem 3.5
The fusion (identifying) of any two vertices in the
cycle of Tα is CDL.
Proof:
Let Tα be the graph with centrev0, the vertex set V =
{u0, u1,…u6} and the edge set
E = E1∪ 𝐸2 , where E1 = {𝑢𝑖 𝑢𝑖+1 /1 ≤ 𝑖 ≤ 6} and
E2 = {𝑢0 𝑢1 , 𝑢0 𝑢4 , 𝑢1 𝑢6 }
Note that |𝑉(𝑇𝛼 )|= 7 and |𝐸(𝑇𝛼 )|= 8 Fig 6:- The Fusion of u5 and u6 in Theta Graph is CDG
𝑓 ∗ (𝑢0 𝑢4 ) = |[𝑓(𝑢0 )]3 − [𝑓(𝑢4 )]3 | The cardinality of vertices and edges are 7 and 10
𝑓 ∗ (𝑢𝑖 𝑢𝑖+1 ) = 3𝑖 2 − 3𝑖 + 1, resp.,
𝑓 ∗ (𝑢1 𝑢5 ) = [𝑓(𝑢5 )]3
Define the bijective function 𝑓: 𝑉 → {0,1, … 6} as
It is easily observed that all the edge labels are f(x0) = 6
distinct. Hence the graph G admits CDL. For the above f(xj) = j-1
graph, the example mentioned in fig 5 and 6.
For the above labeling pattern, the induced function
f * obtain the edge as
𝑓 ∗ (𝑥𝑗 𝑥𝑗+1 ) = 3𝑗 2 − 3𝑗 + 1, 1 ≤ 𝑗 ≤ 5
𝑓 ∗ (𝑥0 𝑥2) = 215
𝑓 ∗ (𝑥0 𝑥3) = 208
𝑓 ∗ (𝑥0 𝑥5) = 152
𝑓 ∗ (𝑥0 𝑥6) = 91
IV. CONCLUSION
REFERENCES