Are All Hip Extension Exercises Created Equal?: Take Quiz
Are All Hip Extension Exercises Created Equal?: Take Quiz
Are All Hip Extension Exercises Created Equal?: Take Quiz
ABSTRACT staple exercises in a strength and con- dynamic correspondence. Siff (26)
ditioning practitioner’s program, and described dynamic correspondence as
TARGETED HIP EXTENSION EXER-
targeted hip extension exercises often “how closely the means of special
CISES ARE OFTEN PERFORMED TO
fall into a strength coach’s top 5 most [sport-specific] strength preparation
DEVELOP STRENGTH, POWER,
important exercises (8–11,27). Three corresponds to the functioning of the
AND ENDURANCE IN THE HIP neuromuscular system in a given sport.”
targeted hip extension exercises com-
EXTENSORS. ALTHOUGH THESE One of the principles of dynamic corre-
monly performed in athletic weight
EXERCISES CAN POSSESS SIMI- rooms are the good morning, the 458 spondence is the accentuated region of
LAR MOVEMENT PATTERNS, back extension, and the horizontal force production. If it was shown that
BIOMECHANICALLY THE INSTAN- back extension. Each of these exercises the direction of the human body relative
TANEOUS TORQUE AT DIFFERENT can be classified as “hip dominant lifts” to space led to varying accentuated
RANGES OF HIP EXTENSION as they act primarily on the hip joint, as regions of force production in the good
VARIES DEPENDING ON BODY long as the performance of the 3 exer- morning, the 458 back extension, and
POSITION RELATIVE TO SPACE. cises involves flexing and extending the the horizontal back extension exercises,
FOR THESE REASONS, IT IS PRO- hips while keeping the spine and pelvis a case could be made that the different
POSED THAT: (A) HIP EXTENSION in relatively neutral positions. Because hip extension exercises are better suited
EXERCISES MIGHT TRANSFER the knees do not bend substantially to transfer more toward particular sport
BETTER TO SPORT ACTIONS during each of these movements, they actions and lead to unique structural
WHERE THE REGION OF FORCE could be classified as “straight-leg hip adaptations. Moreover, combining
ACCENTUATION IS MOST SPE- extension exercises.” these exercises in a training program
CIFIC; (B) HIP EXTENSION might have a synergistic effect for sports
Given the similarity in movement that require high levels of force produc-
EXERCISES MAY LEAD TO UNIQUE patterns, it would seem that the afore-
STRUCTURAL ADAPTATIONS; AND tion at different hip angles.
mentioned hip extension exercises
(C) A VARIETY OF EXERCISES are interchangeable. In other words, BIOMECHANICAL ANALYSIS OF
MIGHT BE NECESSARY TO MAXI- strength and conditioning practitioners SELECTED HIP EXTENSION
MIZE HIP EXTENSION STRENGTH would typically assume that there is lit- EXERCISES
AND POWER THROUGHOUT THE tle difference in the performance and Basic physics can be used to facilitate
ENTIRE RANGE OF MOTION. imposed training adaptations between a better understanding of the hip bio-
the 3 exercises. However, a biomechan- mechanics in each of the 3 straight-leg
ical analysis of these variations has not hip extension exercises, whereby
INTRODUCTION
yet been conducted in the literature instantaneous external torque is calcu-
he muscles of the posterior
KEY WORDS:
hip extensors; back extension exercise;
tion during activities, such as sprinting coaches to design programs that trans-
458 back extension exercise; good
and jumping (1,2,21,22). For this rea- fer to sports performance, and one such
morning exercise; hamstrings; gluteus
son, squat, Olympic-style lift, deadlift, way of attempting to maximize transfer
maximus
and lunge variations are considered of training is to use the principle of
Copyright Ó National Strength and Conditioning Association Strength and Conditioning Journal | www.nsca-scj.com 17
Hip Extension
of a standing person bent over so that representative of how the move- different hip extension exercises dis-
the torso is parallel to the ground and ment actually occurs. This allows cussed in this article, helping to guide
the torso forms a right angle with the for simpler calculation while not the practitioner as to their application
legs), 1358 hips-flexed positions (think drastically altering the external hip in program design. It should be noted,
of a half-way position between being torque measurement. however, that the aforementioned as-
bent over and standing straight up), 5. The head, arms, and trunk (HAT) sumptions could somewhat skew the
and 1808 hips-neutral positions (think comprise 68% of the individual’s precise mechanical advantage during
of a person standing straight up so that body weight (29). actual performance. In regard to the
his torso and legs form a straight line); 6. The average center of mass of the effects of momentum on hip extension
for visual representations, see Figure 1. HAT is located 0.40 m from the hips. torque, Lander et al. (17) found that
To illustrate these calculations, we used 7. Arm position is in a similar position joint moments varied less than 1%
a hypothetical athletic reference indi- in all the 3 exercises so that the between quasi-static (loading where
vidual (an athletic individual will likely HAT center of mass is unaffected. the inertial effects are negligible) and
store a greater proportion of his torso 8. The individual is 6 feet (182 cm) dynamic analyses during the squat exer-
mass in the upper torso compared with tall and weighs 194 lb (88 kg). cise with near maximum loads because
a sedentary individual) and made a num- 9. Each movement is performed slowly of the inherent slow velocities and ac-
ber of assumptions, including: to eliminate the effects of momen- celerations. Although 100 lb would not
1. The spine and pelvis stay locked in tum, which might not be truly rep- necessarily represent maximal loading
neutral positions while the entire resentative of how the movements and thus would not allow for the use
movement occurs at the hips. really occur. of quasi-static models, it provides a sim-
2. The hips flex to 908, which would 10. The average center of mass of the ple means to predict torque-angle
require good levels of hamstring additional load is located 0.55 m curves at the hips during hip extension
flexibility. from the hips. exercises at different body positions.
3. The knees stay relatively straight 11. The additional load used in each Figure 1 depicts the exercise positions
in each variation. exercise is 100 lb (45 kg). analyzed.
4. The good morning exercise does Simplifying biomechanical calculations
not involve any “sitting back” or in this way enhances our understanding CALCULATIONS
knee flexion, which is not truly of the mechanical advantages of the 3 Each exercise position required the cal-
culation of 2 moments: the moment of
the HAT acting on the hip joint and the
moment of the 100 lb (45 kg) external
resistance acting on the hip joint. Figure 2
illustrates a sample calculation. The cal-
culations are derived as follows:
1. Calculate the weight of the HAT by
multiplying the individual’s body
weight by 0.68 (68%).
2. Convert the weight of the HAT to
Newtons by multiplying the weight
in kilograms by 9.8 (which is the
gravity of Earth, measured in meters
per second squared).
3. Calculate the external torque of the
HATacting on the hip by multiplying
the weight of the HAT (in Newtons)
by the perpendicular distance from
the hip to the HAT center of mass.
4. Convert the weight of the free weight
implement to Newtons by multiply-
ing the weight in kilograms by 9.8
(which is the gravity of Earth, mea-
sured in meters per second squared).
5. Calculate the external torque of the
Figure 1. (A) Good morning exercise: 908, 1358, and 1808 of hip extension. (B) 458 Back free weight load acting on the hip
extension exercise: 908, 1358, and 1808 of hip extension. (C) Horizontal back by multiplying the weight of the
extension exercise: 908, 1358, and 1808 of hip extension. implement (in Newtons) by the
6. Cavagna GA. The landing-take-off the squat exercise. Med Sci Sports Exerc
Brad J. asymmetry in human running. J Exp Biol 22: 117–126, 1990.
Schoenfeld is 209: 4051–4060, 2006. 18. Leonard TR and Herzog W. Regulation of
a lecturer in the 7. Clark RA, Humphries B, Hohmann E, and muscle force in the absence of actin-
exercise science Bryant AL. The influence of variable range myosin-based cross-bridge interaction.
program at the of motion training on neuromuscular Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 299: C14–
City University performance and control of external loads. C20, 2010.
of New York, J Strength Cond Res 25: 704–711, 2011.
19. McBride JM, Triplett-McBride T, Davie AJ,
Lehman College, 8. Duehring MD, Feldmann CR, and Abernethy PJ, and Newton RU.
and director of Ebben WP. Strength and conditioning Characteristics of titin in strength and
the Human Per- practices of United States high school power athletes. Eur J Appl Physiol 88:
strength and conditioning coaches. 553–557, 2003.
formance Lab.
J Strength Cond Res 23: 2188–2203,
20. Nishikawa KC, Monroy JA, Uyeno TE,
2009.
Yeo SH, Pai DK, and Lindstedt SL. Is titin
Roy J. Nates is 9. Ebben WP and Blackard DO. Strength and a ’winding filament’? A new twist on muscle
conditioning practices of National Football contraction. Proc Biol Sci 279: 981–990,
a senior lecturer in
League strength and conditioning coaches. 2012.
the School of J Strength Cond Res 15: 48–58, 2001.
Engineering at the 21. Pandy MG and Zajac FE. Optimal muscular
10. Ebben WP, Carroll RM, and Simenz CJ. coordination strategies for jumping.
AUT University. Strength and conditioning practices of J Biomech 24: 1–10, 1991.
National Hockey League strength and
22. Schache AG, Blanch PD, Dorn TW,
conditioning coaches. J Strength Cond
Gul Tiryaki Brown NA, Rosemond D, and Pandy MG.
Res 18: 889–897, 2004.
Effect of running speed on lower limb joint
Sonmez is an 11. Ebben WP, Hintz MJ, and Simenz CJ. kinetics. Med Sci Sports Exerc 43: 1260–
associate profes- Strength and conditioning practices of 1271, 2011.
sor in the Major League Baseball strength and
23. Schoenfeld BJ. Squatting kinematics and
Department of conditioning coaches. J Strength Cond
Res 19: 538–546, 2005. kinetics and their application to exercise
Health Science at performance. J Strength Cond Res 24:
the City Univer- 12. Escamilla RF, Fleisig GS, Lowry TM, 3497–3506, 2010.
sity of New York, Barrentine SW, and Andrews JR. A three-
dimensional biomechanical analysis of the 24. Schoenfeld BJ. The mechanisms of muscle
Lehman College hypertrophy and their application to
squat during varying stance widths. Med
and program resistance training. J Strength Cond Res
Sci Sports Exerc 33: 984–998, 2001.
director of their exercise science program. 24: 2857–2872, 2010.
13. Escamilla RF, Francisco AC, Fleisig GS,
Barrentine SW, Welch CM, Kayes AV, 25. Schoenfeld BJ. Does exercise-induced
REFERENCES Speer KP, and Andrews JR. A three- muscle damage play a role in skeletal
1. Belli A, Kyrolainen H, and Komi PV. Moment dimensional biomechanical analysis of muscle hypertrophy? J Strength Cond Res
and power of lower limb joints in running. sumo and conventional style deadlifts. 26: 1441–1453, 2012.
Int J Sports Med 23: 136–141, 2002. Med Sci Sports Exerc 32: 1265–1275, 26. Siff M. Supertraining (6th ed). Denver, CO:
2000. Supertraining Institute, 2009. p. 241.
2. Blazevich AJ. Optimizing hip musculature
for greater sprint running speed. Strength 14. Gittoes MJ and Wilson C. Intralimb joint 27. Simenz CJ, Dugan CA, and Ebben WP.
Cond J 22: 22–27, 2000. coordination patterns of the lower extremity Strength and conditioning practices of
in maximal velocity phase sprint running. National Basketball Association strength
3. Brughelli M, Mendiguchia J, Nosaka K,
J Appl Biomech 26: 188–195, 2010. and conditioning coaches. J Strength
Idoate F, Arcos AL, and Cronin J. Effects of
eccentric exercise on optimum length of the 15. Hartmann H, Wirth K, Klusemann M, Cond Res 19: 495–504, 2005.
knee flexors and extensors during the Dalic J, Matuschek C, and 28. Tanimoto M, Sanada K, Yamamoto K,
preseason in professional soccer players. Schmidtbleicher D. Influence of squatting Kawano H, Gando Y, Tabata I, Ishii N, and
Phys Ther Sport 11: 50–55, 2010. depth on jumping performance. J Strength Miyachi M. Effects of whole-body low-
Cond Res 26: 3243–3261, 2012. intensity resistance training with slow
4. Butterfield TA, Leonard TR, and Herzog W.
Differential serial sarcomere number 16. Kubo K, Ohgo K, Takeishi R, Yoshinaga K, movement and tonic force generation on
adaptations in knee extensor muscles of Tsunoda N, Kanehisa H, and Fukunaga T. muscular size and strength in young men.
rats is contraction type dependent. J Appl Effects of isometric training at different J Strength Cond Res 22: 1926–1938,
Physiol 99: 1352–1358, 2005. knee angles on the muscle-tendon complex 2008.
in vivo. Scand J Med Sci Sports 16: 159– 29. Winter D. Biomechanics and Motor
5. Carlsson L, Yu JG, Moza M, Carpen O, and
Thornell LE. Myotilin: a prominent marker of 167, 2006. Control of Human Movement (4th ed).
myofibrillar remodelling. Neuromuscul 17. Lander JE, Simonton RL, and Giacobbe JK. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc,
Disord 17: 61–68, 2007. The effectiveness of weight-belts during 2009. p. 91.