DevOps 2018 Report
DevOps 2018 Report
March 2018
Table of Contents
$499
Table of Contents
TABLE of CONTENTS
4 Author 11 Figure 5: Improvements as a Result of 20 Figure 14: Implementing Collaboration
5 Executive Summary DevOps Tools
6 Research Synopsis 12 Figure 6: Methodologies Used by 21 Figure 15: Importance of Cloud
7 The Big Picture In-House Developers Technologies
9 Development 13 Figure 7: Improvement in Application 22 Figure 16: Investments for DevOps
11 Operations Development Speed Implementation
12 Tooling 14 Figure 8: Average Time to Move 23 Figure 17: Purchase Plans for DevOps
13 Looking Ahead Application into Production Technologies and Tools
15 Appendix 15 Figure 9: Applications Managed by IT 24 Figure 18: Familiarity with DevOps
Team Concept
Figures 16 Figure 10: Alerting IT to Application 25 Figure 19: New Applications Moved into
7 Figure 1: Expected Timeline to Adopt Failures Production
DevOps 17 Figure 11: Recovery Time 26 Figure 20: DevOps Approach to Software
8 Figure 2: Driving the Need for DevOps 18 Figure 12: Critical Tools to Enable Development
9 Figure 3: Major Challenges in DevOps 27 Figure 21: Application Upgrades Moved
Implementing DevOps 19 Figure 13: Implementing Configuration into Production
10 Figure 4: Benefits of DevOps Management Tools 28 Figure 22: Testing Recovery Processes
Table of Contents
TABLE of CONTENTS
Figures 35 Figure 29: Cultural Changes as a Result of 40 Figure 34: DevOps Expertise for New
29 Figure 23: Application Failures DevOps Hires
30 Figure 24: Time Taken for Infrastructure 36 Figure 30: Improvement in IT 41 Figure 35: Purchase Plans for Release
Change Infrastructure Stability Automation Frameworks
31 Figure 25: In-House Developers 37 Figure 31: Impact on Security of 42 Figure 36: Primary Background Area
32 Figure 26: Scripting Languages Used Production Systems 43 Figure 37: Respondent Job Title
33 Figure 27: Enabling Integration 38 Figure 32: Running Production Systems in 44 Figure 38: Respondent Company Size
with APIs the Cloud 45 Figure 39: Respondent Company
34 Figure 28: Top Reasons for Not Adopting 39 Figure 33: Measuring Success of DevOps Revenue
DevOps Methodology Initiatives 46 Figure 40: Respondent Industry
Table of Contents
AUTHOR
Cynthia Harvey
Contributor
Cynthia Harvey is a freelance writer and editor based in the Detroit area. She has been covering the technology industry for more
than 15 years.
Table of Contents
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
DevOps practices encourage closer collaboration between developers and IT operations personnel. This approach relies heavily
on automation to speed the development and deployment of applications, while improving overall efficiency, decreasing outages,
and allowing organizations to recover from failures more quickly.
This second-annual survey asked 150 business technology decision makers about their use of DevOps and the impact those
practices have had on their organizations. It revealed big changes between 2017 and 2018, including the following:
• DevOps is now widespread. A third of respondents said they have already implemented the approach (up from 18% last year),
and another 35% plan to adopt the methodology before the year is up.
• Organizations need speed, with 53% reporting that the pressure to release applications more quickly was driving their DevOps
adoption, up from 29% last year.
• Respondents are realizing increased speed as a key benefit of DevOps, with 69% saying DevOps has increased the speed and
frequency of application deployment, compared to 39% last year.
• As a result of DevOps, 80% of respondents have seen either “significant” or “moderate” improvement in time spent fixing and
maintaining applications.
• Of those surveyed, 76% said their developers were using agile methodologies.
• Docker, Slack, and GitHub are among the most popular tools used by DevOps teams.
ABOUT US
Table of Contents
RESEARCH SYNOPSIS
Interop ITX
Interop ITX is the industry’s
most trusted independent
conference focused on Survey Name: Interop ITX and InformationWeek 2018 State of DevOps
Full Stack IT education for
technology leaders. The
Survey Date: February 2018
event continues the 30 years
Interop has dedicated to pro-
viding IT professionals with a Region: North America
trusted environment to learn,
collaborate, and uncover new Respondent base: 150 technology professionals involved in purchasing technology for their employers. The margin of error for the
strategies and solutions they total respondent base (N=150) is +/- 7.9 percentage points.
need to lead their businesses
through constant change
Methodology: Interop ITX and InformationWeek surveyed business technology decision makers at North American companies on
and disruption. Interop ITX
DevOps-related topics. The survey was conducted online, and respondents were recruited via an email invitation containing an em-
offers both breadth and
depth of content to a broad bedded link to the survey. The email invitation was sent to a select group of UBM’s audience. More than four out of 10 of the result-
IT audience across core ing respondents (43%) work in an IT management role, and more than a third (34%) work in application development. Nearly half
areas: Cloud, Data & Analyt- (49%) were from enterprises with more than 1,000 employees. UBM was responsible for all programming and data analysis. These
ics, DevOps, Government, procedures were carried out in strict accordance with standard market research practices.
Infrastructure, Leadership &
Professional Development,
and Security. For more infor-
mation, visit InteropITX.com.
Table of Contents
The Big Picture
One of the most important findings in this Figure 1
year’s survey is that people now under-
stand what DevOps is all about. This year, Expected Timeline to Adopt DevOps
84% of respondents indicated that they What is your expected timeline to adopt DevOps principles in your organization?
were familiar or very familiar with DevOps, 2018 2017
compared to 60% who said the same thing We have already done so
33%
last year. The “very familiar” category saw 18%
a particularly high spike, climbing from Less than 6 months
17%
18% to 47%. 13%
IT pros don’t just know about DevOps — 6 to 12 months
18%
more are actually using the practices. A full 19%
third said they have already adopted the More than 12 but less than 24 months
11%
approach, compared with just 18% who 11%
said the same in 2017 (Figure 1). Two-thirds 24 months or more
5%
either have already implemented DevOps 3%
or plan to do so before the year is up, and No plans
9%
only 9% have no DevOps plans. 20%
Don’t know
As DevOps becomes more common- 7%
place, the factors driving adoption have 16%
evolved. Last year, the No. 1 driver for the Base: 150 respondents in 2018 and 300 in 2017
Data: Interop ITX DevOps survey of technology professionals, February 2018
methodology was the need to improve
quality and performance of applications
(55%), followed by the need to improve of people citing this as a key driver for need for speed appeared again and again.
the end customer experience (48%) and DevOps implementation. But the No. 2 The challenges holding back adoption
the need to reduce IT costs (35%) (Figure driver, selected by 53% of respondents, have also morphed a bit. Last year, secu-
2). This year, the desire for better applica- was the pressure to release applications rity and compliance concerns topped the
tions seems to have intensified, with 73% more quickly. Throughout the survey, this list, followed by a lack of alignment, a lack
InteropITX.com March 2018 7
2018 State of DevOps
Previous Next
Table of Contents
Table of Contents
Table of Contents
Table of Contents
Table of Contents
Table of Contents
APPENDIX
Figure 9
Fewer than 10
29%
39%
10 to 19
22%
23%
20 to 29
17%
12%
30 to 39
5%
10%
40 to 59
4%
4%
60 or more
23%
12%
Base: 150 respondents in 2018 and 300 in 2017
Data: Interop ITX DevOps survey of technology professionals, February 2018
Table of Contents
Figure 10
Availability monitoring
71%
59%
Irate emails or phone calls
56%
59%
Alerting system to network operations center
54%
46%
Other
8%
9%
Don’t know
3%
5%
Note: Multiple responses allowed
Base: 150 respondents in 2018 and 300 in 2017
Data: Interop ITX DevOps survey of technology professionals, February 2018
Table of Contents
Figure 11
Recovery Time
On average, how long does recovery take when an application fails?
2018 2017
Table of Contents
Figure 13
Table of Contents
Figure 14
Table of Contents
Figure 15
Cloud automation
41% 21% 26% 6% 6%
Cloud management platform
35% 30% 23% 6% 6%
PaaS
34% 22% 29% 7% 8%
IaaS
32% 31% 23% 6% 8%
Data: Interop ITX DevOps survey of 150 technology professionals, February 2018
Table of Contents
Figure 16
Table of Contents
Figure 17
Table of Contents
Figure 18
Table of Contents
Figure 19
Fewer than 10
57%
63%
10 to 19
22%
21%
20 to 29
9%
9%
30 to 39
4%
4%
40 to 59
3%
1%
60 or more
5%
2%
Base: 150 respondents in 2018 and 300 in 2017
Data: Interop ITX DevOps survey of technology professionals, February 2018
Table of Contents
Figure 20
So far, none of our development employs a DevOps strategy, but we’re planning to
20%
35%
Less than a quarter of our development employs a DevOps strategy
34%
35%
One-quarter to one-half of our development employs DevOps
24%
16%
More than half of our development employs DevOps
14%
10%
We use DevOps exclusively
8%
4%
Base: 128 respondents in 2018 and 237 in 2017 who have adopted or plan to adopt DevOps principles
Data: Interop ITX DevOps survey of technology professionals, February 2018
Table of Contents
Figure 21
Fewer than 10
28%
46%
10 to 20
21%
24%
20 to 29
9%
9%
30 to 39
7%
4%
40 to 59
2%
4%
60 or more
28%
9%
Don’t know
5%
4%
Base: 150 respondents in 2018 and 300 in 2017
Data: Interop ITX DevOps survey of technology professionals, February 2018
Table of Contents
Figure 22
Yes
60%
69%
No
24%
15%
Depends on how angry users are
5%
9%
Don’t know
11%
7%
Base: 150 respondents in 2018 and 300 in 2017
Data: Interop ITX DevOps survey of technology professionals, February 2018
Table of Contents
Figure 23
Application Failures
How many application failures (resulting in an outage, disruption, or downtime)
do you have in a typical month?
2018 2017
None
13%
27%
1 to 5
61%
52%
6 to 10
13%
7%
More than 10
6%
7%
So many we gave up counting
2%
1%
Don’t know
5%
6%
Base: 150 respondents in 2018 and 300 in 2017
Data: Interop ITX DevOps survey of technology professionals, February 2018
Table of Contents
Figure 24
Table of Contents
Figure 25
In-House Developers
Does your organization have in-house app developers?
2018 2017
Yes
86%
79%
No
11%
20%
Don’t know
3%
1%
Base: 150 respondents in 2018 and 300 in 2017
Data: Interop ITX DevOps survey of technology professionals, February 2018
Table of Contents
Figure 26
Command line
67%
57%
Python
60%
45%
PowerShell
45%
41%
Node
33%
16%
Ruby
32%
27%
PERL
26%
40%
Other
16%
16%
Note: Multiple responses allowed
Base: 128 respondents in 2018 and 231 in 2017 at organizations with in-house app developers
Data: Interop ITX DevOps survey of technology professionals, February 2018
Table of Contents
Figure 27
Table of Contents
Figure 28
Table of Contents
Figure 29
Table of Contents
Figure 30
No improvement
6%
6%
Some improvement
35%
48%
Significant improvement
50%
31%
Too soon to tell
9%
15%
Base: 128 respondents in 2018 and 237 in 2017 who have adopted or plan to adopt DevOps principles
Data: Interop ITX DevOps survey of technology professionals, February 2018
Table of Contents
Figure 31
Table of Contents
Figure 32
Table of Contents
Figure 33
Table of Contents
Figure 34
Microsoft
30% 15% 7% 3% 45%
Puppet 1%
23% 18% 7% 51%
IBM 0%
13% 14% 9% 64%
CA Technologies
10% 12% 6% 3% 69%
Automic 1%
7% 8% 5% 79%
BMC 2%
7% 7% 7% 77%
Micro Focus (Serena)
5% 5% 5% 1% 84%
Electric Cloud 2%
5% 10% 5% 78%
MidVision 0%
4% 5% 5% 86%
Clarive Software
4% 5% 5% 2% 84%
XebiaLabs 2%
4% 13% 4% 77%
OpenMake Software
2% 8% 5% 4% 81%
Inedo
2% 5% 5% 3% 85%
InteropITX.com Data: Interop ITX DevOps survey of 150 technology professionals, February 2018 March 2018 41
2018 State of DevOps
Previous Next
Table of Contents
Figure 36
IT management
43%
34%
Application development
34%
29%
Systems administration
15%
20%
Network operations
2%
5%
Other
6%
12%
Base: 150 respondents in 2018 and 300 in 2017
Data: Interop ITX DevOps survey of technology professionals, February 2018
Table of Contents
Figure 37
Table of Contents
Figure 38
Table of Contents
Figure 39
Table of Contents
Respondent Industry
What is your organization’s primary industry?
IT vendor
14%
Consulting and business services
10%
Financial services/banking/securities and investments
9%
Healthcare/medical
8%
Government
7%
Telecommunications/ISPs
7%
Insurance/HMOs
6%
Media/entertainment
4%
Education
3%
Energy
3%
Manufacturing/industrial, non-computer
3%
Nonprofit
3%
Retail/e-commerce
3%
Construction/engineering
2%
Electronics
2%
Utilities
2%
Other
14%
InteropITX.com March 2018 46
Data: Interop ITX DevOps survey of 150 technology professionals, February 2018