Thousand Plants Against Cancer Without Chemo 20101
Thousand Plants Against Cancer Without Chemo 20101
Thousand Plants Against Cancer Without Chemo 20101
Thousand Plants
against Cancer
without Chemo-Therapy
May 2010
650 pages
From:
“Mille Piante per guarire dal Cancro senza
Chemio” book –on line
(http://www.erbeofficinali.org/dati/nacci/index.php
http://aloearborescens.tripod.com
http://www.mednat.org/Nacci%20libro.pdf
http://www.medicinetradizionali.it/nacci.htm
1
Everyone is allowed to diffuse
this book, in its paper version
and/or digital format
(CD-ROM or INTERNET),
with no view to profit.
2
If the people let the goverment decide what foods they eat and what
medicines they take, their bodies will soon be in as sorry a state as the
souls who live under tyranny.
Thomas Jefferson
Unless we put medical freedom into the Constitution, the time will come
when medicine will organize into an undercover dictatorship.
To restrict the art of healing to one class of men and deny equal privileges
to others will constitute the Bastille of medical science.
All such laws are un-American and despotic and have no place in a
republic. The Constitution of this republic should make special privilege
for medical freedom as well as religious freedom.
3
The Two Presidents…..
From People,
With People,
For People
Abramo Lincoln
Yes, We can
Barack Hussein Obama
4
DEDICATION…….
…Dr Max Gerson dedicated his life to the mastery of this scourge of
cancer and all should honor his great work…
..... Cancer is not cured with surgical instruments, but with a vegetarian
diet and medicinal herbs…
Hippocrate of Kos
Let your food be your medicine and your medicine be your food….
Hippocrates of Cos
5
….E Noi dovrem, ahimè, morir….
Morir….
Dilegua o Notte…
…Tramontate Stelle…
…Tramontate Stelle…
All’Alba vincerò…
…vincerò…
vincerò !
Luciano Pavarotti
http://it.youtube.com/watch?v=VATmgtmR5o4
6
Article No. 11 of the of Declaration of human and civic rights (France, 1789):
“The free communication of ideas and opinions is one of the most precious rights of
the man: any citizen may therefore speak, write and publish freely”.
”The Republic protects individual health as a basic right and in the public interest; it
provides free medical care to the poor.
Nobody may be forcefully submitted to medical treatment except as regulated by law.
That law may in no case violate the limits imposed by the respect for the human
being”.
7
Note: Scientific references:
In this book the plants are identified by their Latin names –
according to the modern scientific classification (see Chapter 20)
– and 2,050 official scientific publications are quoted (out of 2,100
various bibliographical references (see Chapter 21), useful to in-
depth studies, which confirm the various arguments indicated
here.
8
Thousand Plants against Cancer
without Chemo-Therapy
Ed. 2010
INDEX
DEDICATION…………………………………………………………………………………….5
INDEX…………………………………………………………………………………………….9
INTRODUCTION………………………………………………………………………………..20
Chap.1.b: PROTEINS…………………………..………………………………………………….42
Intestinal DISBIOSIS…………………………………….…………………………………………44
Autoimmune diseases…………………………………………….…………………………………46
9
Chap. 2.4.: The importance of oils…………..…………………………………………………62
Chap.2.9.: Fish……………………………………….…………………………………………..67
Chap.2.10.: Sugars………………………………………….…………………………………….67
Chap.2.11.: Salt……………………………………………….…………………………………..67
10
Chap.2.21.: From hybrid plants to GMO TERMINATOR plants…………………………………..81
Chap.2.23.: Allert G.M.O.: The USA are passing a law that legalizes the contamination of crops
with genetically modified organisms (GMO). Source: Friends of the Earth International
(DECEMBER 2004) ………………………………………………………………………………..88
Chap.2.24.: RUSSIA, GM Food Dangers Directly Affect Biological Descendants and Future
Generations…………………………………………………………………………………………..88
Chap. 2.26.: How the European Union destroys the European Agriculture……….………………..91
Chap. 2.27.: Effects of European rules concerning the size of fruit and vegetable markets on
agricultural production………………………………………………………………………………92
Chap. 2.29.: Obstacles in the way of the Direct Sale from Producers to Consumers………...……...93
11
Modifications of the biochemical and functional parameters of the organism induced by organic
Germanium……..…………………………………………………………………………………113
Chap. 6 : Phyto medicines with a Bio-Chemo-Therapy action: plants which have a “suicide affect”
on Cancer………………………………………………………………..………………………..139
Chap. 6.c………………….………………………..…………………………………..…………152
Chap.6.f: Elemene………………………………………………………………………….……..156
Other Retro-viruses……………………………………….…………..…………………..……….189
Chap. 8.2.: Dangers Inherent in the Process Itself - THE USE OF CAULIFLOWER MOSAIC
VIRUS……………………………...…………………………………..…….……………………190
Chap. 8.3.: Scentific Article in WEB (UNDER : Retro virus and Cancer )……………..………...193
Chap. 9.e.: Anti-cancerous plants or similar plants with immune stimulating properties, mentioned
in Herbario Novo………………………………………………………………..…….…………..223
Chap. 9.f.: Adjuvant immuno-therapy: Phyto medicines with an anti-stromal action on connective
cancer tissue……………………………………………………………………………………….226
13
Chapter 9.g: The HOXSEY Therapy…………………………………………..…………………..228
Marginal note: Diabetes and the grave threat of Genetically Modified Organisms……..……..….241
Chap. 11.2.: Etiopathogenesis and Therapy for MS Developed According to a Neurologist of the
University of Oregon Health Sciences Center in Portland……………………………….….…....246
Chap. 13.5.: The common fallacy that cholesterol is bad, the truth about vitamin C deficiency and
the pharmaceutical issue of Statins……………………….………..……………………………..257
14
Chap. 14: Scientific bases of an ANTI-CANCER therapy on a dietary and multivitaminic basis .258
RELIQUATIO TUMORIS…………………………………………….………………..…………267
EXPURGATIO TUMORIS…………………………………………………………..……………268
OBSERVATIONS………………………………………………………..………….……………269
Cost of Chemotherapy…………………………………………………………………………….308
15
Chap.17.2.: Official statistics of Chemo-Therapy……………………………..………………..309
Brain Tumours……………………………………………………………………………………309
Breast cancer………………………………...…………………………………………………….311
Kidney cancer…………………………………………………………...…………………………316
Ovarian Cancer…………………………………………………………………………………….317
Colorectal Cancer……………………………….………..………………………………………..317
Multiple Myeloma………………………………………………………………………….…..…320
Hodgkin’s Lymphoma…………………………………….………………………………..…..…320
Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma……………………………………………………………………….322
Conclusion……………………………………………………………………………………...….323
Chap. 18.1.: Plants that are potentially efficient against tumors, but whose heavy side-effects are
already known or suspected in their use………………………………………………………..…327
16
Chap. 18.2.: Plants to Absolutely avoid using………………………………………….…………329
Chap. 20 NAMES OF PLANTS of medical interest that have or have not been mentioned in the
previous text……………………….………………………………………………………………340
17
ALLEGATEDs
ALLEGATED No. 5: Sherry Rogers, M.D.: The World's Most Vicious MACC Attack
(MACC - multinational agriculture and chemical corporations)………………………...…………………...…..……485
ALLEGATED No. 8: Phyto-Therapy (Plant therapy) is a classical medical therapy, NOT an alternative
therapy……………………………………………………………….…………………………………..……….……..500
ALLEGATED No. 11 :
The importance of a Healthy and Self-sufficient Agriculture…………………………………………………………....506
ALLEGATED No. 13: Joe Cummins and Mae-Wan Ho : Hazards of CaMV Promoter………………………….….516
ALLEGATED No. 14: Mae-Wan Ho : Recent Evidence Confirms Risks of Horizontal Gene Transfer ………….….518
18
ALLEGATED No. 16:
American Academy of Environmental Medicine. OGM : A Moratorium on Gentically Manipulated (GMO) Food
(22/5/2009)……………………………………………………………….………………………………………….….525
ALLEGATED No. 20
Conferenza SANA (Bologna) 13 settembre 2008, AAM Terra Nuova, Coordinamento Scientifico : Studio Agernova,
Dott. Giuseppe Nacci “La minaccia OGM (Organismi Geneticamente Modificati) sui modelli alimentari di
accompagnamento alla terapia immunitaria e detossificante”. …………………………….……………………..….590
ALLEGATED No. 22 : Thirty Clinical Cases of Dr. Gonzales and Dr. Isaac (New York)………………………..…..596
ALLEGATED No. 24: Fifteen clinical cases of the Kroiss Center (Vienna, Austria)…………………………………639
19
INTRODUCTION
From: “The Gerson therapy. The amazing juicing programme for cancer and other illnesses”, by
Charlotte Gerson and Morton Walker, Thorsons ed.
“During a three-day period, July 1 to 3, 1946, the United States Senate took
testimony from nationally known cancer researchers relating to U.S. Senate Bill
1875, also referred to as the “Pepper-Neely anticancer proposal”. In this bill,
Senators Pepper and Neely recommended the appropriation of $ 100 million from the
U.S. government’s budget for cancer researchers to find a cure for cancer once and
for all.
The impressive testimony of this anticancer specialist and his patients caused Senator
Pepper to call a press conference for bringing information about the Gerson Therapy
before the media. However, massive numbers of lobbyist for the immensely wealthy
Pharmaceutical Manufacturers’ Association (PMA), the American Medical
Association (AMA), and the American Cancer Society (ACS) prevailed on reporters
to ignore the Gerson press conference and attend a cocktail party instead where free
food would be served and libations would be flowing. The only reporter who
preferred to hear the Gerson presentation was American Broad-casting Corporation
newscaster Raymond Gram Swing. During World War II, Mr. Swing had been a
famous war correspondent on a par with Edward R. Murrow. He attended and took
copious notes at the Senate press conference for use in his East Coast 600 P.M. ABC
network broadcast of Wednesday, July 3, 1946. Here is what Raymond Gram Swing
broadcast then throughout the United States:
…“I hope I have my values right if, instead of talking tonight about the agreement reached on Trieste by the Foreign
Minister in Paris, or the continuing crisis of the OPA in Washington , or President Truman’s signing of the Hobbs
antiracketeering bill, I talk about a remarkable hearing before a Senate Subcommittee in Washington yesterday on
cancer and the need for cancer research in new fields.
A bill is before Congress, the Pepper-Neely bill, to appropriate a hundred million dollars for cancer research with
something like the zeal and bigness with which it went for the release of atomic energy, turning the job over to the
scientists with resources generous enough to solve the problem.
20
This alone would make a good theme for a broadcast, just an example of the use a great democracy can make of its
intelligence and wealth. But the subject has been made peculiarly gripping by unprecedented happenings yesterday
before the subcommittee which is holding hearings on this bill, and of which Senator Pepper is chairman.
He invited a witness, a refugee scientist, now a resident of New York, Dr. Max Gerson, and Dr. Gerson placed on the
stand, in quick succession, five patients. They were chosen to represent the principal prevailing types of cancer, and in
each instance they showed that the Gerson treatment had had what is conservatively called “favourable effect on the
course of the disease”. That in itself is remarkable, but it is the more so because Dr. Gerson’s treatment consists mainly
of a diet which he has evolved after a lifetime of research and experimentation. To say that Dr. Gerson has been curing
cancer by a dietary treatment is medically impermissible, for the reason that there must be five years without recurrence
before such a statement is allowed. Dr. Gerson has cured tuberculosis and other illnesses with his diet, but in the U.S.A.
he has only been working on cancer for four and a half years…..
Yet anything that offers even a possibility of treating successfully at least some of the four hundred thousand existing
cancer cases in this country is stirring news, no matter how conservatively it is formulated. There would be non Pepper-
Neely bill to appropriate a hundred million dollars for cancer research if the existing research were coping with the
need.
…I have spoken about this carefully and abstractly, which underplays some of the shock and delight of the experience
yesterday at the hearing of the Pepper Committee. It is one thing to talk about chemistry and diet and vitamins and other
factors in medical science. It is another to see, as the Committee yesterday saw, a seventeen-year-old girl, who had a
tumour at the base of the brain, which was inoperable, and which had paralyzed her. Yesterday, she walked without
assistance to the witness chair, and told clearly about her case and her treatment.
There was a sturdy man, who had been a sergeant in the army. He had had a malignant tumour, also at the base of the
brain, which had been operated on but needed deep X-ray treatment, and this he could not receive because of the danger
to the brain. Yesterday he was the picture of health as he testifield, and quite naturally he was proud of his remarkable
recovery.
There was a woman who had had cancer of the breast which spread. Yesterday she was well, and testified with poise
and confidence.
A few cases showing such improvement cannot, of themselves, affect the outlook of the medical profession. But they
are attested facts and not flukes, and as such they have to be accounted for. And there are many, many more cases
which could have been cited.
It would seem to be the business of medical research to leap on such facts and carry every hopeful indication to a final
conclusion….
So the advocates for the Pepper-Neely bill can argue that, unless we learn now how to deal successfully with cancer,
many millions of persons now living in this country are condemned to die from cancer. A hundred million dollars is
little more than a token payment for America to make, in order to avert such a sweep of death, and they can then point
to the Gerson dietary approach as a most promising field of research….
Dr. Gerson was an eminent if controversial figure in pre-Hitler Germany. He was bound to be controversial because he
was challenging established practice in treating tuberculosis by diet. He has been assistant to Foerster, the great
neurologist of Breslau, and for years assistant to Sauerbruch, one of the great physicians on the Continent. The
Sauerbruch-Gerson diet for skin tuberculosis is well-known to European medicine, and the account of it is part of
accepted medical literature. Dr. Gerson told the Pepper Committee that he had first come upon his dietary theory in
trying to cure himself of migraine headaches. Later he treated others, among them a man with skin tuberculosis as well.
Dr. Gerson was an acknowledged dietary autority in Weimar Germany, and was responsible for the German army of his
time being placed on dehydrated, rather than canned food…..
Raymond Gram Swing continued with his network radio broadcast and brought in
some additional news too. After he ended, the telephone switchboard lit up at the
American Broadeasting Corporation in New York City. People called in from all over
the nation to learn about the Gerson Therapy. But other, darker, more powerful
commercial and political forces had been listening as well.
The executive directors of pharmaceutical companies producing cytotoxic agents
(Chemo-therapy) for cancer treatment – members of the PMA – threatened to cancel
21
all radio advertising contracts for their drugs sold over the counter, an annual loss in
revenue for ABC amounting to tens of millions of dollars. Within two weeks of that
fateful radio broadcast which apprised people of a potential cure for cancer, after
thirty years at the same job Raymond Gram Swing was fired his position as a
newscaster for the ABC network.
You might also wish to know what happened to the Senate’s 227-page Pepper-Neely
anticancer bill of 1946-Document No. 89471. By efforts of the lobbyists working
with four senators who were also medical doctors, the bill was defeated. Today,
Document No. 89471 is stored in boxes and gathers dust in the archives of the U.S.
Government Printing Office.
1) Why didn’t the U.S. Senate over half a century ago adopt the anticancer budgetary
measure that came before it?
2) Wasn’t the prevention of or treatment for Americans coming down with cancer
vital enough ?
3) Why weren’t anticancer experts requested to at least test the Gerson Therapy back
then when senators were presented with the opportunity ?
22