1) Mark Sykes was born in 1879 to a Baronet family in Yorkshire and always remained the "original child of original parents."
2) The biography of Sykes, written by Shane Leslie, captures Sykes' spirit through vivid writing like describing the date of his birth as "a date, but as a dogma."
3) Many felt that Sykes, who had visions for reconciling religions and nations, was "too good to waste" when he suddenly died young, as he seemed to represent the spirit needed to "save England" from its "foul times."
1) Mark Sykes was born in 1879 to a Baronet family in Yorkshire and always remained the "original child of original parents."
2) The biography of Sykes, written by Shane Leslie, captures Sykes' spirit through vivid writing like describing the date of his birth as "a date, but as a dogma."
3) Many felt that Sykes, who had visions for reconciling religions and nations, was "too good to waste" when he suddenly died young, as he seemed to represent the spirit needed to "save England" from its "foul times."
1) Mark Sykes was born in 1879 to a Baronet family in Yorkshire and always remained the "original child of original parents."
2) The biography of Sykes, written by Shane Leslie, captures Sykes' spirit through vivid writing like describing the date of his birth as "a date, but as a dogma."
3) Many felt that Sykes, who had visions for reconciling religions and nations, was "too good to waste" when he suddenly died young, as he seemed to represent the spirit needed to "save England" from its "foul times."
1) Mark Sykes was born in 1879 to a Baronet family in Yorkshire and always remained the "original child of original parents."
2) The biography of Sykes, written by Shane Leslie, captures Sykes' spirit through vivid writing like describing the date of his birth as "a date, but as a dogma."
3) Many felt that Sykes, who had visions for reconciling religions and nations, was "too good to waste" when he suddenly died young, as he seemed to represent the spirit needed to "save England" from its "foul times."
words: 'In the year of the Incarnation of our Lord 1879, and of the Hegira of the Prophet 1296, and on the Eve of the Feast of St. Patrick, an only child was born to Sir T atton Sykes, Baronet, of Sled- mere, in the county of York, and to Jessica Christina his lawful wife. Mark Sykes was this only son, and he always remained the original child of original parents.' It may be added that he ended by securing an original biographer. When a biography begins with a sentence like that, we know, long before such guesses are commonly possible in more conventional cases, that the author is not a hack or a humdrum eulogist, but a man with a sense of history as a back- ground to biography. We know that the author is as interesting as the subject. And we could distinguish this quality of distinction, even if we had not seen on the title page the name of Shane Leslie. The first sentence, recording nothing but a fact such as is found in a directory or a genealogical tree, yet gathers round it a crystallisation of creeds and influences, like the conjunction of stars in some horoscope of a happier and more Christian astrology. We have foreshadowed, as in a dissolving view of historic visions, the influ- ences inspiring the subject and his biographer; be- ginning with the greatest of all influences, the mystery and majesty of their common creed. The date is stated not only as a date, but as a dogma. The second great element in the life of Mark Sykes, his sympathy with Islam and the great dreams of the desert, comes 1 Mark Sykes: His Life and Letters, by Shane Leslie, with an Introduction by the Right Hon. Winston: ChUl chill. (Cas- ,sells, 16/-.) The Life of Mark. Syk.es in merely to confirm a moment of time, and yet a third name strikes the note of that noble tragedy that we call Ireland, to which Mark Sykes always tried to do justice and to which Shane Leslie has dedicated a genius for literature and for life. That first sentence must stand alone for a sample of the excellence of the writing of the book. F or the supreme mark of excel- lence in writing is the power to bring dead words to life; and as a rule there is nothing so dead as a date. It must stand alone in this short estimate of the work. for it contains too much interesting matter to allow of adequate interest in the manner. And if I should select that sentence to sum up the style and spirit of the author of the biography, I should have quite as little difficulty in choosing a sentence to sum up what is to be said first about the subject of it. Lord Howard de Walden wrote of Mark Sykes, whom he had known from boyhood: 'I know I felt that God had probably withdrawn him rightly, because he was too good to waste on our foul times.' There were a great many people who felt, as at the shock of some gong of doom, exactly what Lord Howard de Walden expressed in those words, when they heard the unexpected and unnatural news. I myself, though I never knew Mark Sykes himself, but only many of his friends, can remember looking across at one of them with a sort of consternation, and saying: 'Does it mean that England is not to be saved?' It is not that we should necessarily all agree with all that was said and done by so spirited and adventurous a mind; on the contrary, I think the chief charm and zest of all these letters and quotations is in the trenchant truthfulness and almost random sin- cerity with which he dashes down all sorts of dog- matic impressions, that would be wildly bewildering to anyone who thinks in the grooves of groups and parties. As he would probably be too much of a 82 5 Blacldriars Radical for the taste of most of his colleagues, he would probably be too much of a Tory for mine. The point is not the truth of each of these utterances, but the truth of all of them; a truth that is truthful in a fashion largely forgotten in these 'foul times.' We are looking at something that is exceedingly rare in a sceptical age; a thought that is really free. He did not mind damning the Irish sometimes, just as he did not care a button who blamed him for defending them. He would dismiss the intense imperialism of the South African war as stuff and nonsense driving us into a stupid raid, with all the contempt of a Pro- Boer, and then justify farm-burning under the circum- stances so as to infuriate all Pro-Boers. In short, he had intellectual independence, a thing vanishing in the whirlwind of wordy fashions and the servile senti- mentalism of the newspapers. His comments were not without impatience, but never without intelli- gence; that is to say he had not, properly speaking, any such thing as a prejudice. Strongly as he believed in conservative and traditional elements in a society, as every intelligent man must, his own reactions were hardly ever merely reactionary. They were hardly ever the mere automatic kicking of habit against the pricks of progress. They seem always to have been the result of very rapid, perhaps too rapid, reflection. In other words, his purely intellectual activity seems to have been incessant; and he had a great knack of slap-dash precision in literary style. A phrase like 'Carson is a lop-sided sentimentalist' has the essen- tial quality of literature; it says exactly what it is try- ing to say. Many other examples could be given of the same quality, which is always of clear thinking rather than careful writing. He did not pretend to wield the pencil so seriously as the pen; but the sketches with which his letters were illustrated have much the same reckless accuracy and even subtlety. 826 The Life of Mark SYkes There is an admirable picture of Mr. Balfour in an air-raid, sharing a cellar with two maid-servants. The statesman is looking at the roof; the servants are look- ing at the floor. As a satire on our curiously strained and uncomfortable social distinctions, it goes very deep. Mark Sykes was, above all, an embodiment of the particular sort of intellectual freedom and fullness of life which now goes with belief and not with unbelief. His relation to the religions of the East is a very good example of this. He was the father of Zionism, of a much more sympathetic and imaginative Zionism than that which has since materialised; which has, if one may put it so, very much materialised. At the same time, he never lost his sympathy with the simplicity and sincerity of Islam. But his toleration was founded on interest in religion. Vulgar toleration is founded on indifference to religion. The modern ideal is to reconcile all the beliefs by re-uniting all the un- believers. His interest was in the believers, even when they believed erroneously. That was why he said that Jerusalem was the true Hague Tribunal of humanity, since it was sacred to three great faiths; and that is why it is well that his figure was blazoned in coloured glass as a Crusader, with the motto: ~ Laetare Jerusalem.'