African Vs Western Psychology
African Vs Western Psychology
African Vs Western Psychology
Introduction
The transfer of knowledge and information technologies from the Western countries to the
rest of the world lead to the domination of scientifically based Western worldviews,
philosophies and theories of understanding human behaviour (Mkhize, 2006: 25). However,
an African based psychological phenomenon emerges as an alternative to mainstream
psychology through philosophical engagements with the self and human behaviour. It is
within this framework that this essay shall seek to describe some of the fundamental tenants
of these competing schools of though. This will be done by highlighting and compering
central ideas inherent in each perspective.
However, the perception that mainstream psychological worldviews, theories and ideologies
are considered to be universal and therefore seen as being applicable to everyone has been
largely discredited by African psychology (Mkhize, 2006: 25). This is largely based on the
fact that societies embrace different culturally based worldviews in terms of shared values,
theories and practices of acceptable and inacceptable human behaviour. Notwithstanding that
human beings share universal values such as courage, love and wisdom, African psychology
examines individual behaviour in the context of attributes external to an individual and
acknowledges that Western psychology is not universal (Nsamenang, 2007: 8).
African psychology is focused on indigenous knowledge systems based on cultural ideologies
and theories aimed at examining the behaviour of African people, which is considered to be
distinct from Western based psychology. Hence, in examining human behaviour, mainstream
psychology focuses on the normative standard of individual human cognition. African people
cannot be understood through such a Western based approach because it gives too much
attention to internal processes within the person, autonomous of social and contextual
determinants (Mkhize, 2006: 27).
African psychology echoes the notion that psychologists can adopt a subjective approach
when conducting research and can impose values. An example here would be a psychologist
who uses symbols related to culture when examining human behaviour. Cultural symbols like
statues and images bear a unique meaning within a particular group of people and invoke
mutually assured responses within that group (Hills, 2002: 5). Therefore, mainstream
psychology can produce a wide range of inadequacies when being applied to African people.
This is largely influenced by the fact that Westernised mainstream psychology was developed
through the examination of the Euro-American white middle class who do not share similar
indigenous knowledge systems with African people (Adelowo, 2015: 8).
Adelowo (2015: 5) argues that in an African context an individual’s cultural worldviews and
philosophies influence his or her reality and his behaviour. This means that African
psychology is based on comprehensive lived experiences, values, beliefs, customs and
philosophical traditions that influence individual agency and behaviour. An example here
would be that in contrast to Western psychology, mental illness is not focused on individually
based intra-psychic malfunctioning. Instead, the African worldview observes a broader
context of collective social and political based realities that contribute to mental illness
(Kwate, 2005: 226).
In terms of the value orientation method, mainstream psychologists believe that human nature
echoes the notion that people are complicated species, in that some are good and some are
bad. Therefore, one must examine the nature of each individual separately and if such an
individual proves to be bad it is possible to change him or her through guidance. In contrast,
African psychologists believe that every human being is born with a good heart and is
therefore bestowed with good traits (Schwartz, 2006: 140).
In relation to orientation towards the environment, African psychology considers that human
beings are inseparable with the environment and therefore should live in harmony with it.
This means that African cultures emphasise spiritual oneness with nature (Schwartz, 2006:
140). However, mainstream psychologists are of the view that humans are bestowed with the
ability to control and dominate the environment (Hills, 2002: 5). This emphasises a mastery
approach, in which human beings must work the environment to his benefit.
Furthermore, African psychology places emphasis on past traditions, which are considered to
be important for the present and the future, in that human beings derive their lessons and
values from the past, strive to apply them in the present and preserve them for the future
(Delowo, 2015: 1). On the other hand, mainstream psychologists believe in future orientation
which requires setting up goals and a great deal of sacrifice in order to see a better future.
Moreover, in contrast to mainstream psychology, human orientation activity in African
psychology does not echo the notion that the worth of human beings should be measured by
material computations acquired through hard work (Schwartz, 2006: 140).
Conclusion
This essay has attempted to discuss some of the fundamental tenants enshrined within
Westernised mainstream psychology and African psychology, which emerges as an
alternative perspective. The essay has found that there are competing central ideas inherent
within these competing schools of thoughts with regards to examining and understanding
human behaviour. Whilst mainstream psychology focuses on the cognitive process of the
individual as a solitary subject, African psychology examines individual behaviour within
social and contextual influences.
References
Hills, D.M. (2002) ‘Kluckhohn and Strodtbeck's Values Orientation Theory’ Online Readings
in Psychology and Culture, 4(4) pp 1-14. Available at http://dx.doi.org/10.9707/2307-
0919.1040 accessed on the 17th of March 2017.