Scribd
Upload
399 views2 pages

Scoring Rubric For Document Analysis 1

This document provides a scoring rubric for analyzing student position papers. It evaluates papers based on three criteria: content, organization, and mechanics. Each criterion contains several indicators that are rated on a scale of 1 to 4, with 4 being excellent. Content, worth 50% of the score, considers the claim, arguments, evidence, and consideration of opposing views. Organization, worth 30% of the score, focuses on introduction, body, conclusion, and logical flow. Mechanics, worth 20% of the score, examines spelling, grammar, punctuation, and transitions. Ratings are converted to percentages to calculate the overall score.

Uploaded by

John Paul DjS
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
399 views2 pages

Scoring Rubric For Document Analysis 1

This document provides a scoring rubric for analyzing student position papers. It evaluates papers based on three criteria: content, organization, and mechanics. Each criterion contains several indicators that are rated on a scale of 1 to 4, with 4 being excellent. Content, worth 50% of the score, considers the claim, arguments, evidence, and consideration of opposing views. Organization, worth 30% of the score, focuses on introduction, body, conclusion, and logical flow. Mechanics, worth 20% of the score, examines spelling, grammar, punctuation, and transitions. Ratings are converted to percentages to calculate the overall score.

Uploaded by

John Paul DjS
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2

Scoring Rubric for Document Analysis

Scoring Rubrics:

Direction: Below are the criteria/indicator considered in rating the student position paper. Read each criteria/indicator of the
criterion and rate each using the number corresponding to its rating.

Indicators Level of performance

4 3 2 1 Rating Weight
Excellent Very satisfactory poor
satisfactory
Content (50%)
 The paper as an apparent
claim/ position.
 Gives at least four (4)
ALL
arguments that were
supported by evidence. indicators
1-2 indicators 3-4 indicators 5 or more
 Considered opposing views or are
are NOT are NOT indicators are
counter argument of the satisfied.
satisfied. satisfied. NOT satisfied.
paper’s claim and explain the
validity of the claim.
 Substantial and accuracy of
information.
 Logical discussion of some
theosri
Organization (30%)
 The papers consist of three ALL
parts: introduction, body and indicators
conclusion. are
 It has compelling satisfied.
introduction.
1-2 indicators 3-4 indicators
 Informative, strong and well 5 indicators are
supported body. are NOT are NOT
NOT satisfied.
 The conclusion is satisfying satisfied. satisfied.
and gives emphasis on the
central idea.
 Logical ordering of ideas.

ALL 1 indicator is 2 indicators 3-4 indicators


indicators NOT satisfied. are NOT are NOT
Mechanics (20%) are satisfied. satisfied.
satisfied.
 The paper has NO misspelled
words.
 Transitional words and
phrases are used to connect
ideas which provides
coherence between
paragraphs.
 The paper has NO grammar
errors.
 Correct used of punctuation
marks.

Equivalence of weight ratings : 4=100%; 3.0-3.9=90-99%;2.0-2.9=80-89%;1-1.9=70-79%

You might also like