Seismic Design and Performance Criteria PDF

Seismic Design and
Performance Criteria for

Large Storage Dams
Dr. Martin Wieland
Chairman, ICOLD Committee on Seismic Aspects of Dam Design
Poyry Switzerland Ltd., Zurich, Switzerland
Integral Dam Safety Concept

Structural Safety
Design of dam according to state-of-practice (codes,
regulations, guidelines, etc.) (earthquake design criteria,
methods of seismic analysis etc.)
Dam Safety Monitoring
Dam instrumentation, visual inspections, data analysis and
interpretation, dam safety management system, etc.
Operational Safety
Guidelines for reservoir operation under normal and unusual
conditions, qualified staff, safe software, maintenance, etc.
Emergency Planning
Emergency action plans, water alarm systems, dam breach
flood wave analysis, evacuation plans, engineering back-
up, etc.
1
International Commission on Large Dams (ICOLD)
Committee on Seismic Aspects of Dam Design since 1968
Bulletin 112 (1998): Neotectonics and dams (active faults in
dam foundation) Hazard
Bulletin 137 (2011) Reservoirs and seismicity (reservoir-
triggered seismicity) Hazard
Bulletin 148 (approved 2010): Selecting seismic parameters
for large dams Design Criteria
Bulletin 52 (1986): Earthquake analysis procedures for dams
(linear analysis) Analysis
Bulletin 120 (2001): Design features of dams to effectively
resist seismic ground motion Design
Bulletin 123 (2002): Earthquake design and evaluation of
structures appurtenant to dams Design
Bulletin 62 (1988/2008): Inspection of dams following
earthquakes Inspection
Seismic hazard a multi-hazard

• Ground shaking causing vibrations in dams, appurtenant
structures and equipment, and their foundations (most
earthquake regulations are concerned with this hazard
only!)
• Fault movements in dam foundation or discontinuities
in dam foundation near major faults which can be activated
causing structural distortions;
• Fault movement in reservoir causing water waves in the
reservoir or loss of freeboard;
• Mass movements (rockfalls) causing damage to gates,
spillway piers, retaining walls, powerhouses, electro-
mechanical equipment, penstocks, transmission lines, access
roads to dams, etc.
• Other site-specific and project-specific hazards
2
Tohoku earthquake, March 11, 2011
Failure of 18 m high Fujinuma dam (Japan)
Bhuj earthquake 2001 (India), Damaged irrigation

dam (very low reservoir level at time of earthquake)
3
Sefid Rud buttress dam, Manjil earthquake 1990 (Iran)
Critical crack in buttress of Sefid Rud dam
4
Crack at upstream face of Sefid Rud buttress dam
Collapsed buildings at Sefid Rud dam site
5
Damaged switchyard on fill, Sefid Rud dam
Derailed transformer, Sefid Rud dam
6
Transmission tower failure due to rockfall, Sefid
Rud dam
Failure of radial gate

due to rockfall,
Wenchuan
earthquake, 2008
(China)
7
Rockfall damage
of surface
powerhouse and
equipment,
Wenchuan
earthquake, 2008
(China)
Chi-Chi earthquake 1999 (Taiwan), Shih-Kang Dam
8
Seismic design criteria
Dam and safety-relevant elements (spillway,
bottom outlet):
Operating basis earthquake, OBE (145 years)
(negotiable with owner)
Safety evaluation earthquake, SEE (ca. 10,000 years)
(non-negotiable)
Appurtenant structures (powerhouse etc.):
Design basis earthquake, DBE (ca. 475 years)
Temporary structures (coffer dams, river
diversion) and critical construction stages:
Construction level earthquake, CE (> 50 years)
Seismic performance criteria for dam and

safety-relevant elements
(i) Dam body:
OBE: fully functional, minor nonstructural damage
accepted
SEE: reservoir can be stored safely, structural damage
(cracks, deformations) accepted, stability of dam must be
ensured
(ii) Safety-relevant elements (spillway, bottom

outlet):
OBE: fully functional
SEE: functional so that reservoir can be
operated/controlled safely and moderate (200 year return
period) flood can be released after the earthquake
9
Deriner arch dam in Turkey (spillway)
Safety Evaluation Earthquake (SEE)

• A dam must withstand the ground motion of the SEE.
• The ground motion parameters of the SEE can be obtained
from a deterministic and/or probabilistic seismic hazard
analysis.
• Deterministic analysis (MCE): The ground motion parameters
are represented by the 84% percentile values. The critical
earthquake scenario has to be considered, which is usually
independent of any return period.
• Probabilistic analysis (MDE): The ground motion parameters
are represented by the mean values. For large dams the
return period shall be taken as 10,000 years.
• The ground motion parameters of the SEE are taken as the
maximum of the MCE and MDE.
10
Classification of large dams in Switzerland
Return period
Klasse 1:
10,000 years
Klasse 2:
5,000 years
Klasse 3:
1,000 years
Note: The
flood and
earthquake
safety criteria
should be
consistent.
Definition of large dams in China
Class 1: Reservoir volume > 1000 Mm3

Class 2: Reservoir volume 100 to 1000 Mm3
Class 3: Reservoir volume < 100 Mm3
Conclusion
There may be large differences in the risk
classification of large dams, which have a direct
effect on the seismic (and flood) design and
performance criteria
11
Seismic parameters needed by dam engineer
• Peak Ground Acceleration

• Acceleration Response Spectra (5% damping)
• Acceleration time histories (structures ‘responding’
to inertial forces)
• Displacement time histories (underground structures
‘not responding’ to inertial forces (imposed
deformations)) and wave propagation velocities
• Spatial variation of ground motion for special (long)
structures
Ground shaking
Earthquakes affect all components of a
dam project at the same time:
dam
foundation
safety devices
pressure system
underground works
appurtenant structures
hydro-mechanical equipment
electro-mechanical equipment etc.
12
Typical load combinations used in dam
design
• Usual load combinations: no earthquake

• Unusual load combinations: OBE
• Extreme load combinations: SEE
Design earthquakes for large hydropower projects
• Safety Evaluation Earthquake (SEE)

Maximum Credible Earthquake (MCE)
Maximum Design Earthquake (MDE)
• Design Basis Earthquake (DBE)
• Operating Basis Earthquake (OBE)
• Construction Earthquake (CE)
If reservoir-triggered seismicity (RTS) is possible the

DBE and OBE ground motion parameters should
cover those from the RTS scenarios.
Earthquake prediction is still a research topic and not
possible for strong earthquakes.
13
Design Earthquake
Title Element / Component
OBE/
CE DBE
SEE
Diversion Facilities
- Civil Intake/outlet structures X
Tunnel, tunnel liner X
- Geotechnical Rock slopes X
Underground facilities X
Cofferdams X
- Electrical/Mechanical Gate equipment X
Dam: Dam Body Dam body X

- Individual Blocks OBE
Crest bridge X
Crest spillway cantilevers X X
Bottom Outlet cantilevers X
Foundation/Abutments Abutment wedges X X
Bottom Outlet Main gates, Valves X X
Guard gate X
Operating equipment X X
Dam: Electrical/Mechanical Essential parts X
Lower Crystal Springs gravity dam (USA)

located in San Andreas fault zone, survived 1906 San Francisco
earthquake undamaged
14
Lower Crystal Springs dam
Systematic application of seismic safety

criteria to all structures and components of
large dam projects
Note: Seismic design codes and recommendations
are mainly concerned with new dams.
Question: What’s about the earthquake safety of
existing (older) dams?
Answer: During the long lifespan of a dam several
seismic safety assessments will be required!
15
Conclusions
• The seismic hazard is a multi-hazard for most
large dam projects. Ground shaking is the main
hazard considered in all earthquake guidelines for
dams. The other seismic hazards are addressed
less rigorously than the ground shaking or may
have been ignored.
• Dams are not inherently safe against earthquakes.
• The updated ICOLD guideline on ‘Selecting
seismic parameters for large dams’ covers most
structures and elements of large dams.
• As most dams built prior to 1989 when ICOLD has

published its seismic design criteria of dams, have
not been checked for the safety evaluation
earthquake ground motion, the earthquake safety of
these dams is not known.
• Moreover, due to changes in the seismic design
criteria and the design concepts it may be necessary
to perform several seismic safety checks during the
long economical life of a large dam.
• Reservoir-triggered seismicity is not a separate load
case in dam design but may be relevant for
appurtenant structures and buildings and
infrastructure in dam area.
•
16

Seismic Design and Performance Criteria PDF

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Seismic Design and Performance Criteria PDF

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Seismic Design and Performance Criteria PDF

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Seismic Design and

Performance Criteria for

Integral Dam Safety Concept

Seismic hazard a multi-hazard

Bhuj earthquake 2001 (India), Damaged irrigation

Critical crack in buttress of Sefid Rud dam

Collapsed buildings at Sefid Rud dam site

Derailed transformer, Sefid Rud dam

Failure of radial gate

Chi-Chi earthquake 1999 (Taiwan), Shih-Kang Dam

Seismic performance criteria for dam and

(ii) Safety-relevant elements (spillway, bottom

Safety Evaluation Earthquake (SEE)

Definition of large dams in China

Class 1: Reservoir volume > 1000 Mm3

• Peak Ground Acceleration

• Usual load combinations: no earthquake

Design earthquakes for large hydropower projects

• Safety Evaluation Earthquake (SEE)

If reservoir-triggered seismicity (RTS) is possible the

Dam: Dam Body Dam body X

Lower Crystal Springs gravity dam (USA)

Systematic application of seismic safety

• As most dams built prior to 1989 when ICOLD has

You might also like